Man's World Issue 1

hypercapitalist post-female-liberation twoparents-in-the-workforce
America, and thus
became disconnected from their past by
spending the grander portion of their
formative years under the wing of a neurotic,
often childless and bitter state-mandated
parental surrogate, typically known as a
"teacher." A society dominated by stronger
men would not have entertained the prospect
of such a radical social revolution; and let's
be frank, the 1960s was the decade that
hosted the most tempestuous and
annihilating revolutions in human history.
The boy scouts were
eventually pressured into
accepting girls, despite
there already being girl
scouts
What's worse is the restructuring and
systematizing of society around a treadingon-eggshells,
passive-aggressive, selfrighteous,
neurotic, gossipy borderline
sociopathy, a social world resembling a
modern corporate office with an extensive HR
department that prioritizes inclusivity and
arbitrary feelings over merit,
accomplishment, or worth. This HR-model
design is anathema to the formation of
healthy masculinity. Every male space, to
borrow some rephrased progressive
terminology, has become invaded by dogooders
seeking to be inclusive. But it
ultimately prevents men from forging strong
relationships and camaraderie. For example,
the Boy Scouts were eventually pressured
into accepting girls despite there already
being a Girl Scouts. It's more about erasure of
male spaces rather than grandiose visions of
equality. Everything typically associated with
masculinity has to be worn down. Why?
Because strong men are antithetical to a
society run by low-T locker-dodging nerds.
Strong men don't make capricious
consoomers. Strong men might protest
injustice and anarcho-tyranny. Weak men
exhibiting soyish features - mouth agape,
thin scraggly beards, plaid shirts, poor
muscularity (skinny fat), etc - are far likelier
to be passive and resentful of hierarchy as
they lack the faculties to compete with
stronger men. Almost every aspect of life has
become increasingly feminized - even
language has to be policed and euphemized
to avoid hurting the feelings of protected
minority groups. Wielding this power over
language is little more than a flex to
destabilize the very essence of meaning itself.
We've all heard the arguments along the
lines of 'control the language, control the
thought of the public'' - and they're not
wrong. However, restraining thought and
language is against the nature of stronger
men.
One of the hallmarks of our esteemed current
year has been to elevate superheroes while
chastising real human heroes. This
phenomenon falls in line with a common
The Relentless Attack on Heroism
MAN'S WORLD