09.02.2021 Views

Haddonfeld Today 090_2021Feb05

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

#090 • FEBRUARY 5 TO MARCH 5, 2021

haddonfield.today | 31

BUT GOOD NEWS FOR

HADDONFIELD, AND SENIORS.

The plaintiffs requested reinstatement of their case because the

commissioners had failed to abide by the settlement, which was spelled out

in an order entered by Judge Nan S. Famular in October 2019. The order noted

that the borough would take steps to achieve and promote age-restricted

housing on the site.

In the suit filed in March 2018, the plaintiffs called for the revised

redevelopment plan the commissioners adopted in February 2018 to be

set aside, and for the original (2016) Bancroft redevelopment plan to be

reinstated. The 2018 plan called for fewer design restrictions and increased

floor area per townhome – changes the developer had requested. The

Planning Board voted overwhelmingly against the developer’s requests, but

the commissioners set their objections aside and adopted the revised plan.

It is not known if the Planning Board will reschedule the postponed

hearing on the developer’s pending application soon, or wait until after Judge

Famular hears the plaintiffs’ reinstated suit, on March 3.

FUNDAMENTAL FLAWS

• The commissioners claim the development is designed for “empty nesters.”

It’s not, in any respect: site design, interior design, or unit selling price. The site

plan provides no outdoor communal areas. Some units have elevators that

serve the first and second floors, but their occupants will be forced to navigate

six or more steps to the garage. How does that make sense? For many emptynesters,

a purchase price of $550,00+ will be upsizing, not downsizing.

• The area of impervious coverage is so great that the developer is proposing

to defile adjacent County-owned open space parkland by constructing a

pipe to discharge stormwater into the Cooper River. Obtaining approval for

this will be a major hurdle, as it appears to violate new NJ Department of

Environmental Protection regulations protecting a 300-foot riparian zone.

Also, it appears to violate DEP Green Acres rules which prohibit using parkland

for private development.

Right-sized, right-priced flats that meet the wants and needs of downsizing

seniors is the obvious answer. If only the commissioners could admit it.

Please help HERD fund its legal efforts to require the Commissioners

to act responsibly! Donate at GoFundMe.com – search for “Bancroft

Ordinance” – or mail a check payable to HERD to PO Box 60, Haddonfield.

Thank you!

Name: .............................................................................................................................................

Email: .............................................................................................................................................

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!