2014 CIOPORA Chronicle
CIOPORA annual magazine on Intellectual Property protection for plant innovations 2014. Produced in cooperation with FloraCulture International. Read in the 2014 issue: - Innovation bridges gap between tradition and future - Challenges of modern horticulture - IP Solutions for the Future: Creative Barcode - ‘Mission FUTURE’: CIOPORA’s position papers on IP - Enforcement reform: an Australian story - Trademarks and variety denominations - harmonization underway? and more...
CIOPORA annual magazine on Intellectual Property protection for plant innovations 2014. Produced in cooperation with FloraCulture International.
Read in the 2014 issue:
- Innovation bridges gap between tradition and future
- Challenges of modern horticulture
- IP Solutions for the Future: Creative Barcode
- ‘Mission FUTURE’: CIOPORA’s position papers on IP
- Enforcement reform: an Australian story
- Trademarks and variety denominations - harmonization underway?
and more...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 1. World: Per Capita Supplies of Major Fruits and Fruit Categories, 1990-92, 2000-02 and 2010-12 (kilograms)<br />
Category/Fruit 1990-92<br />
(kg)<br />
2000-02<br />
(kg)<br />
2010-12<br />
(kg)<br />
Change 1990-92 to<br />
2010-12 (%)<br />
Apples 7.73 9.27 10.63 + 37.5<br />
Other Deciduous 6.06 7.76 9.70 + 60.1<br />
Total Deciduous 13.79 17.03 20.33 + 47.4<br />
Total Grapes 10.92 10.10 9.74 – 10.8<br />
Oranges 9.67 9.99 9.86 + 2.0<br />
Other Citrus 5.43 7.05 8.72 + 60.6<br />
Total Citrus 15.10 17.04 18.58 + 23.0<br />
Bananas 9.05 10.82 14.95 + 65.2<br />
Other Tropical 14.33 16.35 19.76 + 37.9<br />
Total Tropical 23.38 27.17 34.71 + 48.5<br />
All Berries 0.77 0.93 1.08 + 40.3<br />
All Other Fresh 2.94 3.95 4.58 + 55.8<br />
Total Fruits 66.90 76.22 89.02 + 33.1<br />
Source: UN, FAO, FAOSTAT database online.<br />
Future certain –<br />
heightened competition<br />
The trends in fruit supplies,<br />
marketing opportunities and<br />
consumer motivations mean that<br />
in the next ten years competition<br />
within the fruit category will become<br />
even more intense. There will be<br />
strong downward pressure on producer<br />
prices. Many firms will seek<br />
to survive by lowering unit costs,<br />
either through more efficient use<br />
of inputs, or through greater output<br />
per hectare. Unfortunately, increased<br />
yields will increase the risk of global<br />
supplies outrunning demand.<br />
Salvation through<br />
breeding advances<br />
Over the last two to three decades,<br />
many progressive fruit growers<br />
have sought to escape the downward<br />
price squeeze in commodity<br />
markets by differentiating their<br />
products through brands,<br />
marks of excellence, protected<br />
geographical indicators or other<br />
methods. However, the small price<br />
premiums earned have helped little<br />
when overall price levels sank.<br />
In contrast, the breeding of new<br />
varieties has brought significant<br />
gains in individual fruit categories.<br />
The development of seedless grapes<br />
and easy-peeler oranges has transformed<br />
those categories. In summer<br />
fruits, there has been a steady<br />
parade of new, named varieties. In<br />
the case of sweet cherries, the focus<br />
was on breeding earlier or later<br />
varieties to lengthen the season and<br />
avoid the dramatic price drops that<br />
used to occur during a single peak<br />
harvest. This effort has so far been<br />
only partially successful.<br />
Can apples be<br />
the exception?<br />
There is much optimism about<br />
the value of breeding new apple<br />
varieties. Varieties such as Jonagold,<br />
Elstar, Gala, Fuji and Braeburn<br />
earned large price premiums<br />
for several years. When those<br />
premiums eroded with increasing<br />
volumes, a consensus developed<br />
among the apple industry leaders<br />
that price premiums could be<br />
maintained for longer periods if<br />
the Intellectual Property of the<br />
new variety was tightly controlled,<br />
the number of trees planted and<br />
volume marketed was limited, and<br />
if the image of the new variety was<br />
protected through tight control of<br />
names, packaging and promotion.<br />
These are usually referred to as<br />
‘managed’ or ‘club’ varieties.<br />
(Photo credits: Better3Fruit). >>><br />
<strong>CIOPORA</strong> <strong>Chronicle</strong> June <strong>2014</strong> | www.FloraCulture.eu 31