01.03.2021 Views

2014 CIOPORA Chronicle

CIOPORA annual magazine on Intellectual Property protection for plant innovations 2014. Produced in cooperation with FloraCulture International. Read in the 2014 issue: - Innovation bridges gap between tradition and future - Challenges of modern horticulture - IP Solutions for the Future: Creative Barcode - ‘Mission FUTURE’: CIOPORA’s position papers on IP - Enforcement reform: an Australian story - Trademarks and variety denominations - harmonization underway? and more...

CIOPORA annual magazine on Intellectual Property protection for plant innovations 2014. Produced in cooperation with FloraCulture International.

Read in the 2014 issue:
- Innovation bridges gap between tradition and future
- Challenges of modern horticulture
- IP Solutions for the Future: Creative Barcode
- ‘Mission FUTURE’: CIOPORA’s position papers on IP
- Enforcement reform: an Australian story
- Trademarks and variety denominations - harmonization underway?
and more...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. World: Per Capita Supplies of Major Fruits and Fruit Categories, 1990-92, 2000-02 and 2010-12 (kilograms)<br />

Category/Fruit 1990-92<br />

(kg)<br />

2000-02<br />

(kg)<br />

2010-12<br />

(kg)<br />

Change 1990-92 to<br />

2010-12 (%)<br />

Apples 7.73 9.27 10.63 + 37.5<br />

Other Deciduous 6.06 7.76 9.70 + 60.1<br />

Total Deciduous 13.79 17.03 20.33 + 47.4<br />

Total Grapes 10.92 10.10 9.74 – 10.8<br />

Oranges 9.67 9.99 9.86 + 2.0<br />

Other Citrus 5.43 7.05 8.72 + 60.6<br />

Total Citrus 15.10 17.04 18.58 + 23.0<br />

Bananas 9.05 10.82 14.95 + 65.2<br />

Other Tropical 14.33 16.35 19.76 + 37.9<br />

Total Tropical 23.38 27.17 34.71 + 48.5<br />

All Berries 0.77 0.93 1.08 + 40.3<br />

All Other Fresh 2.94 3.95 4.58 + 55.8<br />

Total Fruits 66.90 76.22 89.02 + 33.1<br />

Source: UN, FAO, FAOSTAT database online.<br />

Future certain –<br />

heightened competition<br />

The trends in fruit supplies,<br />

marketing opportunities and<br />

consumer motivations mean that<br />

in the next ten years competition<br />

within the fruit category will become<br />

even more intense. There will be<br />

strong downward pressure on producer<br />

prices. Many firms will seek<br />

to survive by lowering unit costs,<br />

either through more efficient use<br />

of inputs, or through greater output<br />

per hectare. Unfortunately, increased<br />

yields will increase the risk of global<br />

supplies outrunning demand.<br />

Salvation through<br />

breeding advances<br />

Over the last two to three decades,<br />

many progressive fruit growers<br />

have sought to escape the downward<br />

price squeeze in commodity<br />

markets by differentiating their<br />

products through brands,<br />

marks of excellence, protected<br />

geographical indicators or other<br />

methods. However, the small price<br />

premiums earned have helped little<br />

when overall price levels sank.<br />

In contrast, the breeding of new<br />

varieties has brought significant<br />

gains in individual fruit categories.<br />

The development of seedless grapes<br />

and easy-peeler oranges has transformed<br />

those categories. In summer<br />

fruits, there has been a steady<br />

parade of new, named varieties. In<br />

the case of sweet cherries, the focus<br />

was on breeding earlier or later<br />

varieties to lengthen the season and<br />

avoid the dramatic price drops that<br />

used to occur during a single peak<br />

harvest. This effort has so far been<br />

only partially successful.<br />

Can apples be<br />

the exception?<br />

There is much optimism about<br />

the value of breeding new apple<br />

varieties. Varieties such as Jonagold,<br />

Elstar, Gala, Fuji and Braeburn<br />

earned large price premiums<br />

for several years. When those<br />

premiums eroded with increasing<br />

volumes, a consensus developed<br />

among the apple industry leaders<br />

that price premiums could be<br />

maintained for longer periods if<br />

the Intellectual Property of the<br />

new variety was tightly controlled,<br />

the number of trees planted and<br />

volume marketed was limited, and<br />

if the image of the new variety was<br />

protected through tight control of<br />

names, packaging and promotion.<br />

These are usually referred to as<br />

‘managed’ or ‘club’ varieties.<br />

(Photo credits: Better3Fruit). >>><br />

<strong>CIOPORA</strong> <strong>Chronicle</strong> June <strong>2014</strong> | www.FloraCulture.eu 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!