Newslink March 2021
Motor Schools Association of Great Britain membership magazine; driver training and testing; road safety; general motoring matters
Motor Schools Association of Great Britain membership magazine; driver training and testing; road safety; general motoring matters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
News<br />
Examiner recruitment drive and flexibility<br />
enforced as DVSA targets waiting times<br />
The DVSA has made its first move in a<br />
bid to cut the number of people waiting<br />
for an L-test by announcing a new<br />
recruitment programme for driving<br />
examiners.<br />
In a statement released at the start of<br />
February the agency said the suspension<br />
of L-testing as a result of the Covid-19<br />
pandemic had led to “exceptionally high<br />
demand for driving tests.”<br />
Furthermore, “the measures put in<br />
place to protect candidates and staff from<br />
Covid-19 have limited the number of<br />
available tests outside of lockdowns,<br />
including reducing the number of tests our<br />
examiners carry out per day.”<br />
To help increase the number of<br />
available tests, the DVSA said it was:<br />
• offering more tests outside of normal<br />
working hours, including weekend and<br />
bank holidays.<br />
• ensuring DVSA staff who are qualified<br />
to perform driving tests are doing so, such<br />
as senior managers and policy staff.<br />
But these alone will not reduce the<br />
backlog as quickly as is required.<br />
Therefore, on February 10 the DVSA<br />
launched a national recruitment campaign<br />
for new driving examiners, with posts in<br />
England, Scotland and Wales.<br />
No numbers were released as to how<br />
many examiners were to be recruited.<br />
A spokesman for the DVSA added: “The<br />
recruitment of new examiners is one of<br />
the actions we are taking to reduce the<br />
backlog caused by the pandemic.<br />
“We will also work with the driver and<br />
rider training associations on our plan to<br />
reduce waiting times. We will then share<br />
our plan as soon as we can, as we’d like<br />
your feedback on our proposals. This will<br />
also be an opportunity for you to share<br />
any of your ideas with us.”<br />
The agency asked instructors to play<br />
their part in reducing driving test waiting<br />
times. It acknowledged that demand<br />
would remain high and “it will take time<br />
to get our services back to normal.” But in<br />
the meantime, “it is vital that your pupils<br />
are test-ready when rearranging their<br />
tests, as tests could be at short notice.<br />
“On average, fewer than 50 per cent of<br />
learners pass their driving test and there<br />
could be long waiting times for a retest –<br />
your pupils should take their test only<br />
when they are confident they can pass.”<br />
Tests for all candidates who have been<br />
affected by the current restrictions have<br />
now been rearranged. If the new time and<br />
date is not suitable, you can change the<br />
test time and date at: https://www.gov.uk/<br />
change-driving-test<br />
MSA GB national chairman Peter<br />
Harvey said the recruitment drive was<br />
welcomed but the number of new<br />
examiners rumoured to be added to the<br />
roster would not see waiting times<br />
reduced quickly. “It also seems difficult to<br />
see how ADIs can ensure candidates are<br />
‘test-ready’ when they haven’t had chance<br />
to practise or fine-tune their skills.<br />
“That’s why it is imperative that ADIs<br />
are allowed back to work some time<br />
before testing resumes, as has been<br />
suggested will happen.”<br />
Who are you calling smart?<br />
Colin Lilly<br />
Editor, MSA <strong>Newslink</strong><br />
There has been a resurgence recently in<br />
calls to scrap so-called smart motorways.<br />
The Transport Secretary, Grant Shapps,<br />
described the name as a misnomer.<br />
However, it was not a term generated by<br />
Government but by the public and media.<br />
Mr Shapps said that reversing work on<br />
smart motorways was not an option as it<br />
would mean acquiring land the equal of<br />
700 Wembley football pitches, destroying<br />
areas of Green Belt and people’s homes.<br />
He did, however, announce that the<br />
deadline for installation of Stopped<br />
Vehicle Technology (SVD) throughout the<br />
network would be brought forward to the<br />
end of 2022. The SVD systems are<br />
designed to detect a stopped vehicle in a<br />
live lane within 20 seconds, employing<br />
radar units monitoring motorway traffic in<br />
both directions.<br />
He also gave instructions for the work<br />
to establish emergency areas to be no<br />
more than three-quarters of a mile apart<br />
to be speeded up, and tasked Highways<br />
England to achieve this.<br />
During the last five years 44 people<br />
have died on smart motorways. This is at<br />
a lower rate than the remainder of the<br />
network, but incidents tend to attract<br />
more attention and relatives calling for<br />
changes or reversal of the projects. A<br />
Coroner has called for the prosecution of<br />
Highways England.<br />
It would appear the Secretary of State<br />
is determined to carry on with the project<br />
but with a tighter rein on safety.<br />
In the meantime, MPs have launched<br />
their own inquiry, with the Transport<br />
Committee looking at public confidence<br />
into their use and the impact on<br />
congestion.<br />
A Department for Transport evidence<br />
review concluded that “in most ways,<br />
smart motorways are as safe as, or safer<br />
than, conventional motorways”, but made<br />
pledges to improve their safety.<br />
10<br />
NEWSLINK n MARCH <strong>2021</strong>