03.03.2021 Views

Newslink March 2021

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain membership magazine; driver training and testing; road safety; general motoring matters

Motor Schools Association of Great Britain membership magazine; driver training and testing; road safety; general motoring matters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

News<br />

Examiner recruitment drive and flexibility<br />

enforced as DVSA targets waiting times<br />

The DVSA has made its first move in a<br />

bid to cut the number of people waiting<br />

for an L-test by announcing a new<br />

recruitment programme for driving<br />

examiners.<br />

In a statement released at the start of<br />

February the agency said the suspension<br />

of L-testing as a result of the Covid-19<br />

pandemic had led to “exceptionally high<br />

demand for driving tests.”<br />

Furthermore, “the measures put in<br />

place to protect candidates and staff from<br />

Covid-19 have limited the number of<br />

available tests outside of lockdowns,<br />

including reducing the number of tests our<br />

examiners carry out per day.”<br />

To help increase the number of<br />

available tests, the DVSA said it was:<br />

• offering more tests outside of normal<br />

working hours, including weekend and<br />

bank holidays.<br />

• ensuring DVSA staff who are qualified<br />

to perform driving tests are doing so, such<br />

as senior managers and policy staff.<br />

But these alone will not reduce the<br />

backlog as quickly as is required.<br />

Therefore, on February 10 the DVSA<br />

launched a national recruitment campaign<br />

for new driving examiners, with posts in<br />

England, Scotland and Wales.<br />

No numbers were released as to how<br />

many examiners were to be recruited.<br />

A spokesman for the DVSA added: “The<br />

recruitment of new examiners is one of<br />

the actions we are taking to reduce the<br />

backlog caused by the pandemic.<br />

“We will also work with the driver and<br />

rider training associations on our plan to<br />

reduce waiting times. We will then share<br />

our plan as soon as we can, as we’d like<br />

your feedback on our proposals. This will<br />

also be an opportunity for you to share<br />

any of your ideas with us.”<br />

The agency asked instructors to play<br />

their part in reducing driving test waiting<br />

times. It acknowledged that demand<br />

would remain high and “it will take time<br />

to get our services back to normal.” But in<br />

the meantime, “it is vital that your pupils<br />

are test-ready when rearranging their<br />

tests, as tests could be at short notice.<br />

“On average, fewer than 50 per cent of<br />

learners pass their driving test and there<br />

could be long waiting times for a retest –<br />

your pupils should take their test only<br />

when they are confident they can pass.”<br />

Tests for all candidates who have been<br />

affected by the current restrictions have<br />

now been rearranged. If the new time and<br />

date is not suitable, you can change the<br />

test time and date at: https://www.gov.uk/<br />

change-driving-test<br />

MSA GB national chairman Peter<br />

Harvey said the recruitment drive was<br />

welcomed but the number of new<br />

examiners rumoured to be added to the<br />

roster would not see waiting times<br />

reduced quickly. “It also seems difficult to<br />

see how ADIs can ensure candidates are<br />

‘test-ready’ when they haven’t had chance<br />

to practise or fine-tune their skills.<br />

“That’s why it is imperative that ADIs<br />

are allowed back to work some time<br />

before testing resumes, as has been<br />

suggested will happen.”<br />

Who are you calling smart?<br />

Colin Lilly<br />

Editor, MSA <strong>Newslink</strong><br />

There has been a resurgence recently in<br />

calls to scrap so-called smart motorways.<br />

The Transport Secretary, Grant Shapps,<br />

described the name as a misnomer.<br />

However, it was not a term generated by<br />

Government but by the public and media.<br />

Mr Shapps said that reversing work on<br />

smart motorways was not an option as it<br />

would mean acquiring land the equal of<br />

700 Wembley football pitches, destroying<br />

areas of Green Belt and people’s homes.<br />

He did, however, announce that the<br />

deadline for installation of Stopped<br />

Vehicle Technology (SVD) throughout the<br />

network would be brought forward to the<br />

end of 2022. The SVD systems are<br />

designed to detect a stopped vehicle in a<br />

live lane within 20 seconds, employing<br />

radar units monitoring motorway traffic in<br />

both directions.<br />

He also gave instructions for the work<br />

to establish emergency areas to be no<br />

more than three-quarters of a mile apart<br />

to be speeded up, and tasked Highways<br />

England to achieve this.<br />

During the last five years 44 people<br />

have died on smart motorways. This is at<br />

a lower rate than the remainder of the<br />

network, but incidents tend to attract<br />

more attention and relatives calling for<br />

changes or reversal of the projects. A<br />

Coroner has called for the prosecution of<br />

Highways England.<br />

It would appear the Secretary of State<br />

is determined to carry on with the project<br />

but with a tighter rein on safety.<br />

In the meantime, MPs have launched<br />

their own inquiry, with the Transport<br />

Committee looking at public confidence<br />

into their use and the impact on<br />

congestion.<br />

A Department for Transport evidence<br />

review concluded that “in most ways,<br />

smart motorways are as safe as, or safer<br />

than, conventional motorways”, but made<br />

pledges to improve their safety.<br />

10<br />

NEWSLINK n MARCH <strong>2021</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!