13.04.2021 Views

MDF Magazine Issue 64 April 2021

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Healthy Living

Still, based on the evidence to date, the FDA does not

feel concerned that the COVID-19 vaccines will cause

any harm to those with a rare disease ‒ including those

with a compromised immune system ‒ Marks said.

“It is really hard to study vaccine efficacy and

safety in one rare disease, because we just don’t

have enough people with those diseases to come to significant

conclusions,” said Stephen Hahn, the commissioner

of the FDA.

The bigger question, he said, is whether they will be as

effective among this population. At this point, scientists

don’t know for sure the answer to that question.

But since many people with rare diseases ‒ particularly

those with any form of respiratory compromise or diabetes

‒ are at risk of more severe COVID-19 infections,

“the benefit may outweigh the risks,” Marks said. He

stressed the importance of patients discussing the individual

benefits and risks of the vaccines with their own

healthcare providers.

With some in the rare disease community hoping to

access gene therapies in the not-so-distant future,

patients have expressed concern about the risk of being

unable to access these medications after receiving the

vaccine, due to the development of antibodies against

the viral vector.

Marks said this should not be an issue, noting that the

vaccines “are packaged essentially in a soap bubble, and

the soap bubble is not like … any of the adeno-associated

viruses that are being used for directly administering

gene therapy, nor is it like any of the other vectors

that are being used.”

“The likelihood of something happening here,

where one of these vaccines would preclude

you from getting a gene therapy, is pretty much nonexistent,”

he said.

When asked whether the rare disease community should

choose one of the COVID-19 vaccines over the other,

Marks explained that they are similar vaccines, with very

close dosage schedules.

The two available vaccines both use messenger RNA

(mRNA) ‒ the intermediate molecule that carries information

from the DNA to produce a protein ‒ to teach cells how

to make viral proteins that trigger an immune response

to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

Both vaccines have shown 94‒95% efficacy, meaning

that they have prevented that percentage of patients

from becoming infected, relative to placebo treatments.

By comparison, the annual influenza vaccine is typically

about 70% effective.

The two COVID-19 vaccines also showed strong safety

profiles, with allergic reactions occurring on the order

of one in 100,000 individuals or less. Notably, the reactions

that did occur appeared to be triggered by one of

the vaccine components, which Hahn says both the FDA

and CDC are investigating.

“For all intents and purposes, these are

very similar vaccines,” Marks said, adding

“I cannot say that one is better than the other.”

In the very rare case that someone does experience an

allergic reaction, Amanda Cohn, chief medical officer in

the Office of Vaccine Policy at the CDC, says that vaccine

administration sites are trained and equipped to handle

the situation, with necessary medications on hand. The

CDC recommends waiting 30 minutes after receiving

the injection so that any symptoms that do arise can be

promptly treated.

Cohn also addressed the concern of who gets vaccinated,

and when and where. Cohn said that local jurisdictions

can exercise flexibility in these decisions, as

they best know how to serve the needs of their individual

communities. Information about available vaccinations

can be found on state health department websites

and directly from most large healthcare systems; many

municipalities also are offering the vaccine through their

health and emergency services agencies.

A final concern that the panel addressed was that of the

new SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as the one recently

discovered in the United Kingdom. Although this virus

appears to spread faster than other strains, the current

vaccines so far appear effective against it, Marks said.

“Right now, whatever you can get in your arm

in a timely manner, that’s the vaccine that’s the best,”

he said.

“More troubling,” he said, “is a South African

variant, which may be less well-covered.”

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!