17.05.2021 Views

Leadership in Organizations

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c. What about <strong>in</strong>dividuals without experience<br />

Mumford three characteristics that need to be <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals to make the journey<br />

of leadership<br />

1. Will<strong>in</strong>g to tackle difficult and challeng<strong>in</strong>g organizational problems<br />

2. Must be will<strong>in</strong>g to exercise <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

3. Should be motivated to demonstrate social commitment – do<strong>in</strong>g the right<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

society<br />

L<strong>in</strong>k between skill and effective outcome is not made explicit<br />

➔ Model does not expla<strong>in</strong> how an improvement <strong>in</strong> skill lead to improvement <strong>in</strong><br />

performance<br />

Chapter 4 The Style approach to leadership<br />

The role of, and relationship between, followers and the leader is now considered.<br />

<strong>Leadership</strong> style is the comb<strong>in</strong>ation of traits, skills and behaviours leaders use as they<br />

<strong>in</strong>teract with followers.<br />

In order to be successful, the leader should adopt a leadership style that is appropriate<br />

to the nature of the followers and circumstance the leader <strong>in</strong>habits.<br />

Stogdill’s model of leadership behaviour: consideration and <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g structures.<br />

- Consideration: the extent to which a leader exhibits concern for the welfare of<br />

the members of the group. Interpersonal relationships, mutual trust, friendship à<br />

relationship oriented<br />

- Initiat<strong>in</strong>g structures: a set of behaviours that <strong>in</strong>volved the leader def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g leader<br />

and group member roles, <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g actions, organiz<strong>in</strong>g group activities, and<br />

def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g how tasks are to be accomplished by the group à task-oriented<br />

University of Michigan had about the same split: employee orientation and production<br />

orientation. But this theory is focused on deliver<strong>in</strong>g results for the organization <strong>in</strong>stead<br />

of develop<strong>in</strong>g strong human relationships.<br />

Michigan model VS Ohio model: Michigan model states employee orientation and<br />

production orientation is on a cont<strong>in</strong>uum. Ohio model states that a leader could<br />

demonstrate both (or no) human and task orientation.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!