22.06.2022 Views

COS Indiana Newsletter June

What's happening in COS Indiana. What can I do is a hot topic for those looking to join the largest grassroots army fighting to save our constitution!

What's happening in COS Indiana. What can I do is a hot topic for those looking to join the largest grassroots army fighting to save our constitution!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lone Star program, created to fill the gaps created by the federal government’s failures, has<br />

resulted in nearly 14,000 criminal arrests, 3,800 firearms apprehended, and more than 300<br />

million lethal doses of fentanyl seized at the border. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton reported<br />

in 2021 that Texas taxpayers paid more than $850 million annually to support services for illegal<br />

immigrants.<br />

Rep. Chip Roy, who represents the 21st District of Texas, which includes a part of San Antonio, a<br />

leading hub for human trafficking, exemplified the increasing dangers for citizens as well<br />

migrants when he testified for the House Committee on General Investigating, explaining a<br />

recent San Antonio 911 call. The Bexar County Sheriff’s office, Homeland Security Investigations,<br />

Texas DPS, and San Antonio Police Department all worked to search for a large tanker truck after<br />

a distressed migrant pled with a 911 dispatcher for help, explaining in Spanish that the<br />

passengers were trapped in the vehicle and dying, as they ran out of air. The immigrant reported<br />

80 trafficking victims, none of which were located or saved.<br />

Last year Border Patrol found 383 dead migrants, the highest toll in a decade. Texas ranchers,<br />

many of whom request to remain unidentified for fear of retribution by the Mexican cartels,<br />

have discovered an increasing number of dead migrants scattered around their properties.<br />

Texas, along with the state of Missouri, has filed suit against the Biden administration’s<br />

suspension of the MPP, Migrant Protection Protocols, commonly referred to as the “Remain in<br />

Mexico” policy. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 26 but even if the suspension<br />

is reversed, it will be too little, too late, to adequately protect and provide for Texans.<br />

The Texas House Committee on General Investigating, chaired by Rep. Matt Krause, has proposed<br />

a creative route to resolve the border crisis plaguing our nation. Writing to Paxton, the chairman<br />

has requested Texas explore the legality of utilizing the “State Self Defense” or “Invasion Clause”<br />

of the U.S. Constitution to facilitate Texas to independently secure the border, as the Biden<br />

administration has undeniably failed to do so.<br />

Prior to this appeal, the committee received testimony from many of Texas’ key players. Tracy<br />

Norris, major general of the Texas Army National Guard, explained that the “federal government<br />

has provided no support for this mission [protection of the border]” and even the Office of the<br />

Attorney General acknowledged the crisis “immediately endangers our citizens and law<br />

enforcement personnel” as the Biden administration’s refusal to acknowledge the severity of the<br />

crisis has overburdened agents and staff, forcing the state to “stand alone against this influx.”<br />

The overwhelming consensus is the increasing necessity to act.<br />

Krause’s inquiry referenced the recent opinion by Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, in<br />

which he claims the crisis at Arizona’s southern border, inflamed by cartel and gang violence,<br />

satisfies a series of constitutional requirements that empower states to act autonomously.<br />

Article I, Section X of the U.S. Constitution, known as the “State Self Defense Clause,” dictates that<br />

a state may not defend itself, “without the Consent of Congress … unless actually invaded, or in<br />

such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.” Justice Scalia postulated this clause “leaves<br />

intact [State’s] inherent power to protect their territory”.<br />

Additionally, the “Invasion Clause,” Article IV Section IV ensures that “The United States shall<br />

guarantee” to “protect each of them [each State] against Invasion.” The contestation lies in<br />

whether the border crisis, thousands of migrants flooding into southern states daily, qualifies as<br />

an invasion.<br />

Those who view constitutional jurisprudence with an originalist lens may turn to Johnson’s 1785<br />

English dictionary, which was widely popular as the Constitution was drafted; defining invasion<br />

as a “hostile entrance upon the rights or possessions of another; hostile encroachment.”<br />

Contrarily, the Cambridge Dictionary modernly defines an invasion as “an occasion when a<br />

large number of people or things come to a place in an annoying and unwanted way.” In<br />

Federalist No. 43 James Madison wrote that protection against invasion is “not only against<br />

foreign hostility but against ambitious or vindictive enterprises.”<br />

Section IV contains no explicit limitation on the interpretation of “invasion.” Invasion can<br />

therefore be applied broadly to hostile non-state actors such as cartels and gangs.<br />

Members of MS-13 have been arrested at the border in the past year, charged with crimes from<br />

drug possession to aggravated homicide. According to Customs and Border Protection data, the<br />

agency had arrested 2,424 criminal aliens by March of this year, coming just 14 arrests shy of the<br />

total arrests in 2020; crimes of those arrested include homicides, rapes, robberies, and deaths<br />

caused by driving under the influence, evidently qualifying as unwanted and a hostile<br />

encroachment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!