CEAC-2022-08-August
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
News<br />
Japan Court Holds Utility Execs Liable<br />
for Fukushima Crisis By Mari Yamaguchi | Associated Press<br />
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Wednesday, July 13, ordered<br />
four former executives of the utility operating the<br />
tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant to pay 13<br />
trillion yen ($94 billion) to the company, holding them liable<br />
for the 2011 disaster.<br />
In the closely watched ruling, the Tokyo District Court said<br />
the former chairman of Tokyo Electric Power Company<br />
Holdings, Tsunehisa Katsumata, and three other former<br />
executives failed to fulfil their duty to implement the utmost<br />
safety precautions despite knowing the risks of a serious<br />
accident in case of a major tsunami. It said they could have<br />
prevented the disaster if they had taken available scientific<br />
data more seriously and acted sooner.<br />
A magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami destroyed key<br />
cooling systems at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, causing<br />
three reactors to melt down, spreading massive amounts of<br />
radiation in the area and preventing tens of thousands of<br />
residents from returning home due to contamination and<br />
safety concerns.<br />
A group of 48 TEPCO shareholders filed the suit in 2012<br />
demanding that Katsumata and four others — former<br />
TEPCO President Masataka Shimizu, former Vice Presidents<br />
Sakae Muto and Ichiro Takekuro, and another executive,<br />
Akio Komori, pay 22 trillion yen ($160 billion) in damages to<br />
the company to cover its costs. It maintained that they had<br />
neglected to heed experts’ tsunami predictions and failed to<br />
take adequate tsunami precautions soon enough.<br />
Presiding Judge Yoshihide Asakura said the former TEPCO executives<br />
“fundamentally lacked safety awareness and a sense<br />
of responsibility.” The ruling noted that TEPCO could have<br />
prevented the disaster if it had carried out necessary construction<br />
work to prevent the plant’s key areas from being<br />
flooded, including making its reactor buildings watertight.<br />
This aerial photo shows the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in<br />
Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, north of Tokyo, on March 17, <strong>2022</strong>.<br />
(Shohei Miyano/Kyodo News via AP)<br />
fossil fuel plants, the July 13 ruling is a warning to nuclear<br />
operators that they may pay a price for safety negligence.<br />
Yuichi Kaido, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said the ruling “will<br />
affect future management decisions at other utility companies<br />
operating nuclear plants.”<br />
Yui Kimura, one of the plaintiffs, welcomed the ruling, saying,<br />
“An accident at a nuclear plant could cause irreversible<br />
damage to lives and the environment. The ruling shows that<br />
those who lack a commitment to bearing responsibility for<br />
that should never serve in executive positions.”<br />
The amount is the highest ever ordered in a lawsuit in Japan.<br />
It greatly exceeded rulings that Olympus Co. pay 59.4 billion<br />
yen ($433 million) in compensation for a coverup of losses,<br />
and that sewing machine maker Janome Co. pay 58 billion<br />
yen ($425 million) in damages for losses from extortion.<br />
He said all five were liable but relieved Komori of the compensation<br />
obligation because he was appointed to his executive<br />
position only a year before the disaster and couldn’t<br />
have acted even if he had tried.<br />
The decision contrasted with a June Supreme Court ruling<br />
that found the government not responsible for paying<br />
compensation sought by thousands of Fukushima residents<br />
over the loss of jobs, livelihoods and communities. It said a<br />
tsunami of that magnitude was not foreseeable even with<br />
the latest available expertise at the time.<br />
As the current pro-business government of Prime Minister<br />
Fumio Kishida calls for speedier safety checks by regulators<br />
to promote nuclear power as a clean energy alternative to<br />
22<br />
| Chief Engineer