Untitled

284
q4otypic corlelatloh co€tf iclsnt vaE . j.gDillcdt (tabte-
63). The.e re.ults $e 1n accoldance rlth the llndingB of
6oko!ov! and AvronoDov (1935) but dl.agr..il vlth the
resuM p!€s.nted by AlhE.r e! d. (re92:.
corretatlon analy6iE !€val.d that getotypic
collelatlon. r€le .tfolgar than phenotyPlc on6s fo! !o6t
of th€ tralts in €ith.! dlloction (rab16-63). tpri
ph€notypic correlatlon co€fflct6nt6 {outd !€Eult du. to
lodilytnq €ff€ct of .nvlroMst on tn6 ..rociatlon ot the
chalact€ls !t th€ s€notyplc levsr. fitgh posltive and
.isniflcant v.lu6 ol senotyt ic corlehtion cosfficl.bt
$as ob.ened.rong nuDbe! of bolla Pe! pllnt.nil yl6lt:l of
seed cotton per plant (0.3553) lolloeed bv unt
pelcsntage anil riDl Indax (0.?189). s6sil ind6x and 11nt
index (0.6271) and rint id:l6x anal oi1 p.lc€nt qe
10.5436). c6notlc collet€ti.on coef!1c1€nt b6tveen sead
lndq .nil slaPle l.nqth (0,496?), boU eeigb! and aeeit
lndex (o.44e3), s6.d ind€x anal !lbr6 .lrenqtb (o.a23a)
.nd llnt lnatex and fib!€ 6treDqth (0.a131) rara .l€o
lEplsEsive. th6 aLbost abs€nce o! g.noCy!,ic colrdlation
b€t{66n boll reight and yle1d o! saad cotton per Plant
vaE ancouraElng, a5 thls !6uld .uoe consoliilallon of
Eatn ln both the t!a1t6 tttn slDultan.ous.electlon.
concluiUnqly, 1n tiplovtng the tleld potantial o! colton
ortivar6 studiad Ia tha plcEent ro!k, alirsct ..I.ct1on