17.11.2022 Views

First Healthcare Compliance CONNECT November 2022

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sedative that is given on a regular basis. What<br />

happened, unfortunately, was that the drug left the<br />

patient brain dead. Later that day, two neurologists<br />

from the medical center report the death to the<br />

Davidson County Medical Examiner. However,<br />

they did not mention the medication error, or the<br />

vecuronium. The death was attributed to bleeding in<br />

her brain and deemed to be natural, as bleeding in<br />

the brain was what she initially came in for. Based<br />

on information provided by the medical center,<br />

the medical examiner did not do an independent<br />

investigation into the death. That’s not uncommon,<br />

either unless there’s a reason, especially when it’s<br />

a renowned medical center, to dispute the findings<br />

or to probe further or if the family has a request that<br />

an autopsy be done. Normally, it is taken as natural.<br />

In January of 2018, in light of the death, the Medical<br />

Center took some significant actions first, they<br />

did not report to state or federal officials which is<br />

required by law that this had occurred. Secondly,<br />

defendant Vaught was fired by Vanderbilt University.<br />

And then subsequently, Vanderbilt negotiated a<br />

settlement with the descendant’s family. That<br />

primarily did three things: first, it gave them a<br />

monetary settlement; secondly, the settlement was<br />

not made publicly known, and lastly, there was a<br />

provision that required them not to speak publicly<br />

about the death or the medication error. Now having<br />

a confidential agreement under a situation where<br />

a patient either dies or has an adverse patient<br />

outcome, that constitutes at a minimum negligence<br />

is not unusual. But for their not reporting and not<br />

being completely truthful with the family about what<br />

happened, there was nothing ill or untoward about<br />

the settlement. So that happens in early 2018.<br />

By October of 2018, an anonymous person<br />

alerts state and federal health authorities to the<br />

unreported medication error that was responsible<br />

for the patient’s death. From there, we have<br />

different licensing boards begin to take interest and<br />

begin investigating. For example, the Tennessee<br />

Department of Health, investigated and decided<br />

not to pursue any disciplinary action against Nurse<br />

Vaught. In a letter to Vanderbilt the agency’s<br />

investigations director said Vaught’s case did<br />

not constitute a violation of the statutes or rules<br />

governing her profession, which is the nursing<br />

profession. And on the same day, the defendant<br />

Vaught was sent a letter saying this matter did not<br />

merit further action.<br />

CMS had a different response. And in fact, they<br />

came in to the Medical Center unannounced to do<br />

a surprise inspection. And the inspection did in fact<br />

confirm that the patient died from an accidental<br />

dose of vecuronium and that the Medical Center did<br />

not report the medication error to the government<br />

or to the medical examiner, according to an<br />

inspection report, and in late <strong>November</strong> 2018, the<br />

circumstances of the fatal medication error became<br />

public for the first time when CMS released their<br />

report. However, they did not identify the nurse or<br />

patient by name. And in fact, the Medical Center’s<br />

reimbursement for Medicare was threatened unless<br />

it could prove it took steps to prevent a similar error<br />

and to provide a correction plan, which it did. So<br />

that appeased the federal agency and its Medicare<br />

reimbursements were secured.<br />

In early 2019, the nurse was identified publicly for<br />

the first time when she was arrested on a criminal<br />

indictment for her alleged role in the death. Initially,<br />

she was charged with reckless homicide and<br />

impaired adult abuse. But Vanderbilt was not named<br />

as a codefendant, and Vanderbilt did not take<br />

any disciplinary action, nor did the board did not<br />

take any disciplinary action. That’s the Tennessee<br />

Board of Licensing, despite Vanderbilt purchasing<br />

the automatic dispensing cabinet that was utilized,<br />

despite it being responsible for the internal,<br />

technical, physical, and administrative safeguards<br />

being in place. And in light of, some of the issues<br />

that nurses dealt with on a regular basis.<br />

This is a large case. It seems like there were<br />

so many different players in it that could<br />

have been sued or prosecuted and I am<br />

surprised they were not.<br />

Right. So, at the beginning, I mentioned different<br />

Contact Toll Free: 888-54-FIRST 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!