Pittwater Life June 2023 Issue
INCREASE TREE FINE ‘HURT’ A TRIBUTE TO COMMUNITY COUPLE JOHN & PAM WARD SURFING IN SIBERIA / JONATHAN KING’S CORONATION DIARY SEEN... HEARD... ABSURD... / HOT PROPERTY / THE WAY WE WERE
INCREASE TREE FINE ‘HURT’
A TRIBUTE TO COMMUNITY COUPLE JOHN & PAM WARD
SURFING IN SIBERIA / JONATHAN KING’S CORONATION DIARY
SEEN... HEARD... ABSURD... / HOT PROPERTY / THE WAY WE WERE
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
News<br />
Tree fines: ‘Increase the hurt’<br />
<strong>Pittwater</strong>-based community<br />
group Canopy Keepers<br />
is urging Northern<br />
Beaches Council to increase<br />
the financial penalty for the<br />
illegal removal of trees.<br />
The group also want Council<br />
to advertise tree removal<br />
applications and permits<br />
onsite, with signage as per<br />
current Development Application<br />
displays.<br />
Their calls follow a decision<br />
in Manly Court on May<br />
9 where a developer was<br />
convicted of the removal of 14<br />
trees from a construction site<br />
at North Narrabeen in 2021.<br />
The defendant was ordered<br />
to pay a fine of $10,000 plus<br />
professional legal costs, with<br />
the court judgment describing<br />
the offence as a “serious<br />
breach”.<br />
Canopy Keepers spokeswoman<br />
Deborah Collins said<br />
although the group welcomed<br />
the successful prosecution,<br />
the penalty was insufficient<br />
deterrent.<br />
“Unfortunately, we need to<br />
increase the hurt,” Ms Collins<br />
said.<br />
Council was first alerted to<br />
the issue in September 2021<br />
after receiving a complaint<br />
about the removal of a tree at<br />
a construction site in North<br />
Narrabeen.<br />
On inspection, Council<br />
found that 14 trees had been<br />
removed in contravention of a<br />
development consent.<br />
Northern Beaches Council<br />
Interim CEO Louise Kerr said<br />
the case served as an important<br />
reminder of the need<br />
to comply with development<br />
consents.<br />
WATERED DOWN DETERRENT: Canopy Keepers’ Deborah Collins wants<br />
financial penalties for the illegal removal of trees increased.<br />
“Northern Beaches Council<br />
is committed to protecting<br />
and maintaining trees and<br />
bushland, especially threatened<br />
species and trees with<br />
heritage significance,” Ms<br />
Kerr said.<br />
“Council has zero tolerance<br />
to these types of offences and<br />
takes these matters seriously.<br />
“While these 14 trees have<br />
sadly been removed, we hope<br />
that this will serve as an<br />
important reminder to others<br />
in the community to comply<br />
with conditions of their<br />
development consent and not<br />
remove trees without Council<br />
permission.”<br />
Canopy Keepers’ Ms Collins<br />
told <strong>Pittwater</strong> <strong>Life</strong>: “We support<br />
Council’s stand of Zero<br />
Tolerance with breaches of<br />
this kind… residents have a<br />
high expectation that Council<br />
is able to act in such circumstances<br />
and yet more often<br />
than not our canopy and our<br />
wildlife suffer an irreversible<br />
loss with limited reparation.<br />
“The NSW Department<br />
of Planning says it gives<br />
Councils extensive powers<br />
to investigate incidents and<br />
penalise offenders, yet we believe<br />
many at Council would<br />
agree that there is much in<br />
the legislation that requires<br />
reviewing and improving – including<br />
an easier way to bring<br />
about convictions.”<br />
She pointed to Ku-ring-gai<br />
Council as leading the way to<br />
have illegal tree removal fines<br />
increased.<br />
Ms Collins urged Northern<br />
Beaches Council to join with<br />
other councils to ensure fines<br />
were increased, as well as<br />
amend the ‘burden of proof’<br />
legislation.<br />
“We call on the Council to<br />
advertise tree removal applications<br />
and permits onsite<br />
– just as they do DAs.<br />
“This allows residents to<br />
know in advance what is happening<br />
to their community of<br />
trees and why it is happening<br />
– and this alone could avert<br />
many illegal removals.”<br />
She noted that in the North<br />
Narrabeen case, the developer<br />
received a $10,000 fine 18<br />
months after the offence.<br />
“That’s $700 per tree for<br />
possibly 70-100 years of<br />
growth – such a fine is not a<br />
deterrent to a developer or a<br />
wealthy home buyer, it simply<br />
is part of the development<br />
cost and seen as such,” Ms<br />
Collins said.<br />
She added that planting<br />
replacement tree stock, that<br />
took decades to mature, did<br />
not replace habitat or canopy,<br />
and with often a low compliance,<br />
this solution was<br />
flawed.<br />
Ms Collins said another<br />
layer of deterrent could be<br />
added if tree loppers were<br />
made accountable after carrying<br />
out illegal services for<br />
their clients.<br />
“In this instance was the<br />
tree lopper also fined? If a<br />
tree lopper was at risk of being<br />
listed on the NBC website<br />
or newsletter as disreputable,<br />
might that deter them?” she<br />
posed.<br />
Ms Collins said the<br />
vigilance of residents was<br />
essential in deterring illegal<br />
tree felling.<br />
“Follow the sound of the<br />
chainsaw, take photos of<br />
the tree felling, call Council,<br />
check the NBC website for approvals,<br />
talk to neighbours,”<br />
she said. – Nigel Wall<br />
*What do you think? Tell us<br />
at readers@pittwaterlife.com.<br />
au; also visit canopykeepers.<br />
org.au<br />
22 JUNE <strong>2023</strong><br />
The Local Voice Since 1991