28.02.2024 Views

Midland Farmer - Spring 2024

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2024</strong><br />

Planning<br />

system for<br />

slurry storage<br />

‘completely<br />

clogged’<br />

The planning permission<br />

system for<br />

slurry storage is<br />

“completely clogged”<br />

at the moment, the<br />

Joint Oireachtas<br />

Committee on Agriculture,<br />

Food and the<br />

Marine has heard.<br />

The comment was<br />

made by the president<br />

of the Irish Creamery<br />

Milk Suppliers’ Association<br />

(ICMSA),<br />

Denis Drennan who<br />

addressed the committee<br />

yesterday<br />

recently.<br />

Drennan told the<br />

committee that there<br />

is currently a situation<br />

where “anybody<br />

and everybody” is in a<br />

position in which<br />

they can object planning<br />

permission for<br />

slurry storage.<br />

He said it is “completely<br />

ridiculous”<br />

that somebody “living<br />

300 miles away” can<br />

object planning based<br />

on the distance from a<br />

Special Protected<br />

Area (SPA) or Special<br />

Area of Conservation<br />

(SAC).<br />

Drennan said there<br />

is a “huge” number of<br />

non-governmental<br />

organisations (NGOs)<br />

in Ireland who are<br />

“making a full-time<br />

job out of objecting to<br />

farmers [doing] the<br />

right thing”.<br />

“On one hand part of<br />

their organisation is<br />

saying that farmers<br />

need to spread slurry<br />

at the right times and<br />

have the proper facilities<br />

in place.<br />

“Yet the other wing<br />

of the same organisation<br />

can be objecting<br />

and become serial<br />

objectors to people<br />

who want to do the<br />

right thing,” the<br />

ICMSA president told<br />

the committee.<br />

PLANNING FOR<br />

SLURRY STORAGE<br />

Drennan said that,<br />

at the moment, planning<br />

permission can<br />

take up to 18 months,<br />

even for “straightforward”<br />

cases, which he<br />

said is completely<br />

“unacceptable” for<br />

farmers.<br />

He added that the<br />

Targeted Agricultural<br />

Modernisation<br />

Scheme (TAMS 3) is<br />

also “clogged up”,<br />

stating that only 800<br />

of the over 2,500 applications<br />

for slurry<br />

storage are approved<br />

to date.<br />

Stressing that farmers<br />

“can’t have<br />

enough slurry storage”,<br />

Drennan said<br />

that it is the “ultimate<br />

goal” to be in a position<br />

to spread slurry<br />

when the weather<br />

conditions are<br />

favourable.<br />

If a farmer is in control<br />

of their slurry<br />

and spreads it at the<br />

most “optimal” time<br />

in terms of grass<br />

uptake, that is the<br />

“most effective” for<br />

farmers economically<br />

and the environment,<br />

he said.<br />

FAST TRACKING<br />

He said the planning<br />

system and TAMS<br />

need to be fixed, and<br />

fast tracking of planning<br />

and “maybe even<br />

planning exemptions”<br />

where farmers are<br />

building on existing<br />

farmyard is needed.<br />

“We can’t have a situation<br />

where getting<br />

planning permission<br />

can take up to 18<br />

months and to get<br />

approval for TAMS<br />

takes another nine or<br />

10 months,” Drennan<br />

said at the meeting.<br />

Under current<br />

TAMS rules, where<br />

farmers have less<br />

than the legally<br />

required slurry storage,<br />

they are ineligible<br />

for a TAMS grant<br />

for slurry storage or<br />

soiled water, the<br />

ICMSA said.<br />

The association is<br />

proposing that if<br />

farmers are below the<br />

legal requirement and<br />

wish to bring their<br />

slurry facilities up to<br />

20 weeks, for example,<br />

they would be<br />

required to pay the<br />

full cost up to the<br />

legal limit and would<br />

get grant aid thereafter.<br />

For example, if<br />

farmers have 15<br />

weeks storage in Zone<br />

A (16 weeks), they<br />

would pay for one<br />

weeks’ storage and<br />

would get grant aid on<br />

the additional four<br />

weeks, the ICMSA<br />

said.<br />

MIDLAND FARMER<br />

Calf registrations surplus 300,000 for <strong>2024</strong><br />

Calf registrations have now<br />

reached 314,424 head for <strong>2024</strong>,<br />

with 96,628 registered in the last<br />

week based on Irish Cattle Breeding<br />

Federation (ICBF) data.<br />

The data from ICBF applies to<br />

calves that were registered before<br />

16 February.<br />

This time last year, some 434,763<br />

head had been registered, which<br />

means that based on the data, registrations<br />

are down 120,339 compared<br />

to last year.<br />

CALF REGISTRATIONS<br />

Looking at the data, 268,888 calves<br />

have been registered to dairy dams<br />

– this is down 104,442 head on 2023.<br />

For this week, 87,906 calves were<br />

registered to dairy dams, which<br />

when compared to the same week<br />

last year is down 62,588.<br />

Some of the decrease may be due<br />

to the National Genotyping Programme,<br />

which is currently taking<br />

12.5 days for calves to be registered<br />

from tagging.<br />

Moving to the calves registered to<br />

beef dams, there have been 45,536<br />

calves registered so far this year.<br />

For the same period in 2023 some<br />

61,433 calves had been registered to<br />

beef dams, which means that numbers<br />

are down 15,897 head.<br />

For the week ending 16 February,<br />

a total of 96,628 calves were registered<br />

to dairy and beef dams –<br />

9<br />

which when compared to the same<br />

period in 2023 is down 68,608 head.<br />

For the same period in 2023, some<br />

165,236 had been registered to dairy<br />

and beef dams.<br />

GENOTYPING<br />

The National Genotyping Programme<br />

is in its first year, and as of<br />

13 February, more than 66,000 animal<br />

passports were issued via the<br />

programme.<br />

ICBF has stated that the programme<br />

is “progressing well” and<br />

that on average, it is taking 12.5<br />

days from birth to receiving the<br />

animal’s passport.<br />

Postage delays have been noted as<br />

an issue in the receiving of samples<br />

to the labs.<br />

However, in the programme’s<br />

information handbook, ICBF said<br />

that including postage, the whole<br />

process – from tagging to the issuing<br />

of animal passports, can take<br />

on average 10 to 12 days.<br />

For more, see page 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!