29.12.2012 Views

Subject Categories - FTP Directory Listing - Nato

Subject Categories - FTP Directory Listing - Nato

Subject Categories - FTP Directory Listing - Nato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

03 AIR TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY<br />

tions with additional studies could be used in the development of<br />

better occupant safety systems.<br />

Author<br />

Air Bag Restraint Devices; Finite Element Method; Human Factors<br />

Engineering; Deformation; Loads (Forces); Inflatable Structures;<br />

Impact Damage<br />

20000032865 Textron Bell Helicopter, Fort Worth, TX USA<br />

APPLICATION OF DAMAGE TOLERANCE TO INCREASE<br />

SAFETY OF HELICOPTERS IN SERVICE<br />

Krasnowski, Bogdan R., Textron Bell Helicopter, USA; Application of<br />

Damage Tolerance Principles for Improved Airworthiness of<br />

Rotorcraft; February 2000, pp. 7-1-7-8;InEnglish; See also<br />

20000032859; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

In the past, all helicopters have been designed to safe-life<br />

requirements. Introduced in October 1989, FAR 29.571 at Amendment<br />

28 requires damage tolerance substantiation for transport<br />

category helicopters. Therefore, the majority of helicopters currently<br />

in service were designed to safe-life requirements. In general, the<br />

safe-life approach has proven to be adequate. However, there have<br />

been a number of field problems with cracking components, which<br />

lend themselves to the application of a damage tolerance approach.<br />

Damage tolerance analysis allows addressing the safety of the<br />

cracking components by: Evaluation of the field cracking, supported<br />

by the laboratory evaluation of the field-returned cracks; Establishment<br />

of the inspection interval in conjunction, if necessary, with<br />

operation limitations; and Specification of fixes to be applied to the<br />

structure to either increase the inspection limit and/or lift the operation<br />

limitations. To accomplish the above listed tasks, crack growth<br />

analysis is performed using the appropriate usage spectrum and the<br />

flight load survey data. If necessary, usage spectrum reviews and<br />

additional flight load surveys could be required. The crack growth<br />

analysis results are verified by the laboratory evaluation of the<br />

cracked components, and if necessary by the additional crack<br />

growth testing of the field-returned components with cracks or the<br />

pre-cracked components.<br />

Author<br />

Crack Propagation; Tolerances (Mechanics); Damage; Helicopters;<br />

Cracks; Aircraft Safety; Helicopter Design<br />

20000032866 Agusta A. Finmeccanica Co., Cascina Costa di<br />

Samarate, Italy<br />

AGUSTA EXPERIENCE ON DAMAGE TOLERANCE EVALUA-<br />

TION OF HELICOPTER COMPONENTS<br />

Mariani, Ugo, Agusta A. Finmeccanica Co., Italy; Candiani, Luigi,<br />

Agusta A. Finmeccanica Co., Italy; Application of Damage Tolerance<br />

Principles for Improved Airworthiness of Rotorcraft; February 2000,<br />

pp.8-1-8-12;InEnglish; See also 20000032859; Copyright<br />

Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Within the fatigue evaluation of the EHl0l, Agusta has carried<br />

out a specific program of flaw tolerance evaluation of the primary<br />

loading path. The program is close to completion and this paper<br />

provides a summary of the most relevant results. For composite<br />

components, damage size was increased considering both manufacturing<br />

discrepancies greater than the minimum quality standard<br />

and impact damages clearly detectable during visual inspections.<br />

The favourable data achieved are based on the ‘no growth’ concept.<br />

The metal parts of the main rotor head were evaluated by enhanced<br />

safe life method and fail safe capability. The slow crack growth<br />

approach was instead applied for the Rear Fuselage End Fittings,<br />

which connect the Tail Unit. All these evidences can be used in<br />

addition to the comprehensive safe life evaluation of the aircraft to<br />

improve the maintenance and the repair actions. Based on this<br />

experience, application of flaw tolerance criteria will be carried out on<br />

the new helicopters in development phase.<br />

Author<br />

Eh-101 Helicopter; Composite Materials; Crack Propagation; Impact<br />

Damage; Tolerances (Mechanics); Helicopters; Aircraft Structures;<br />

Fiber Composites<br />

20000105075 Department of the Air Force, Kirtland AFB, NM USA<br />

THE COST/BENEFIT OF AGING ON SAFETY AND MISSION<br />

COMPLETION IN AVIATION PROFESSIONS<br />

King, R. E., Department of the Air Force, USA; Operational Issues of<br />

Aging Crewmembers; August 2000, pp. 17-1 - 17-6; In English; See<br />

also 20000105060; Copyright Waived; Avail: CASI; A02, Hardcopy<br />

16<br />

The suspected detrimental effects of aging lead to concerns<br />

about aging pilots in civilian and, to a lesser extent, military flying.<br />

The typically superior cognitive ability of all pilots, and experience of<br />

older pilots in particular, however, render them a valuable asset and<br />

dictate they be carefully assessed when concerns about their<br />

cognitive ability arise.<br />

Author<br />

Cost Effectiveness; Age Factor; Safety<br />

20010002554 European Research Office (US Army), Army Research<br />

Lab., London, UK<br />

SAFETY AND SERVICE DIFFICULTY REPORTING<br />

Sampath, S. G., European Research Office (US Army), UK; Aging<br />

Engines, Avionics, Subsystems and Helicopters; October 2000, pp.<br />

7-1 - 7-12; In English; See also 20010002548; Copyright Waived;<br />

Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Today, safety is considered to be of highest importance in most<br />

societies. In the context of the military, safety is essential to averting<br />

loss of life and damage to a high-value asset. While safety may take<br />

second place to winning a war, its importance is further accentuated<br />

because of its connotation to battlefield readiness. There have been<br />

numerous instances to illustrate this last point. To wit: (1) Widespread<br />

Fatigue Damage (WFD) was discovered in ‘weep holes’ of<br />

fuel tanks of some C-141 military transport airplanes. Because of the<br />

loss of minimum residual strength, with the attendant risk of catastrophic<br />

fracture posed by WFD, the entire fleet had to be grounded<br />

and an expensive refurbishment program had to be undertaken<br />

before the fleet was deemed to be airworthy. In this instance, the<br />

unsafe condition was detected and corrected quickly, so no lives<br />

were lost nor did any of the airplanes in the fleet suffer catastrophic<br />

damage. However, the grounded aircraft were certainly not battleready<br />

for a certain length of time. Had they been sent into battle, they<br />

would have had to be operated under severe flight restrictions and,<br />

thus, their utility to serve the purpose of the deployed forces would<br />

have been very restricted. Had they been deployed without any<br />

restrictions, in all probability they would have been unable to<br />

complete their missions and the Air Force could have lost valuable<br />

aircraft assets. Also, the necessary logistic support to properly carry<br />

out tactical operations in the battlefield would not have been available.<br />

(2) WFD was the primary cause of a highly publicized air<br />

accident involving a commercial aircraft. The wide publicity given to<br />

that single accident, abetted by on-site video tape recording of the<br />

condition of the aircraft after it had landed, shook the confidence of<br />

the public in the safety of commercial aviation. As a result, inspection<br />

and refurbishment of 3000 jet transport airplanes among a fleet of<br />

about 5000 was mandated by the authorities, to be undertaken on an<br />

urgent basis. The economic impact of this mandate on the airlines,<br />

the aircraft manufacturer and the flying public was high and resulted<br />

in numerous complaints to the regulatory authorities. It must be<br />

noted that since that time more than twelve years have elapsed<br />

without a single accident attributable to WFD.<br />

Author<br />

Aircraft Reliability; Damage; Fatigue (Materials); Fractures<br />

(Materials); Aircraft Safety; Flight Safety; Accident Prevention<br />

20010028487 European Research Office (US Army), London, UK<br />

SAFETY AND SERVICE DIFFICULTY REPORTING<br />

Sampath, S. G., European Research Office (US Army), UK; Aging<br />

Aircraft Fleets: Structural and Other Subsystem Aspects; March<br />

2001, pp. 12-1 - 12-13; In English; See also 20010028476; Copyright<br />

Waived; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy<br />

Today, safety is considered to be of highest importance in most<br />

societies. In the context of the military, safety is essential to averting<br />

loss of life and damage to a high-value asset. While safety may take<br />

second place to winning a war, its importance is further accentuated<br />

because of its connotation to battlefield readiness. There have been<br />

numerous instances to illustrate this last point. To wit: Widespread<br />

Fatigue Damage (WFD) was discovered in ‘weep holes’ of fuel tanks<br />

of some C-141 military transport airplanes. Because of the loss of<br />

minimum residual strength, with the attendant risk of catastrophic<br />

fracture posed by WFD, the entire fleet had to be grounded and an<br />

expensive refurbishment program had to be undertaken before the<br />

fleet was deemed to be airworthy. In this instance, the unsafe<br />

condition was detected and corrected quickly, so no lives were lost<br />

nor did any of the airplanes in the fleet suffer catastrophic damage.<br />

However, the grounded aircraft were certainly not battle-ready for a<br />

certain length of time. Had they been sent into battle, they would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!