Summary of Submissions Report - Environmental Protection Authority
Summary of Submissions Report - Environmental Protection Authority
Summary of Submissions Report - Environmental Protection Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3. Limitations <strong>of</strong> this report<br />
September 2012<br />
MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway Proposal <strong>Summary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Submissions</strong> report<br />
Identification <strong>of</strong> trends and concerns within the report are based on information provided by<br />
submitters in their written submissions lodged during the submission period.<br />
Information is accurate at time <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> submission and takes into account changes requested<br />
by parties following close <strong>of</strong> submissions up to 30 August 2012.<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 5.2 <strong>of</strong> this report, if a submitter has indicated a position both ‘in full’ and<br />
‘in part’, ‘in full’ has been recorded as their overriding position.<br />
The categorisation <strong>of</strong> information in section 5.5 <strong>of</strong> this report were based on the submitter name on<br />
the submission form and does not reflect if an individual submission refers to businesses or other<br />
types <strong>of</strong> groups in their submission.<br />
It is not unusual for submissions received on notified proposals <strong>of</strong> this nature to cover a broad<br />
range <strong>of</strong> issues and <strong>of</strong>fer differing levels <strong>of</strong> detail. Whilst each submission can be unique, the<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> the submissions necessarily involves a degree <strong>of</strong> generalisation. Summaries are<br />
therefore not a replication <strong>of</strong> the original submission. The original submission should be referred to<br />
at all times for the full content <strong>of</strong> the submission. Full copies <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the submissions are available<br />
as PDF (Portable Document Format) files on the EPA website.<br />
The <strong>Summary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Submissions</strong> table in Appendix Four needs to be regarded with caution. The<br />
analysis is based solely on the content <strong>of</strong> the submission form and the stated position <strong>of</strong> the<br />
submitter. In some cases it is not immediately evident what decision a submitter seeks from the<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> Inquiry with respect to the information provided in their submission. If the submitter has<br />
strongly inferred through the reasons for the submission and/or their stated submitter position, the<br />
EPA has interpreted this inference and stated (inferred) in Appendix Four.<br />
4. Introduction<br />
4.1 Background<br />
On 20 April 2012, the <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Protection</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> (EPA) received an application from the<br />
NZTA for a Notice <strong>of</strong> Requirement and 29 Resource Consents ("the matters") for the MacKays to Peka<br />
Peka Expressway Proposal (the proposal).<br />
The proposal involves the construction, operation, and maintenance <strong>of</strong> an approximately 16 km<br />
section <strong>of</strong> State highway, formed to an expressway standard, from 2 kms north <strong>of</strong> MacKays Crossing<br />
to Te Kowhai Road, Peka Peka in the Kāpiti Coast District.<br />
The proposal will provide for an Expressway with two lanes <strong>of</strong> traffic in each direction, connections<br />
with local roads at four interchanges, new local roads and access roads to maintain local connectivity,<br />
and an additional bridge crossing over the Waikanae River.<br />
The EPA recommended to the Minister for the Environment to direct the matters to a board <strong>of</strong> inquiry<br />
for decision. The Minister has accepted the EPA’s recommendation and directed the matters to be<br />
4