30.12.2012 Views

Summary of Submissions Report - Environmental Protection Authority

Summary of Submissions Report - Environmental Protection Authority

Summary of Submissions Report - Environmental Protection Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. Limitations <strong>of</strong> this report<br />

September 2012<br />

MacKays to Peka Peka Expressway Proposal <strong>Summary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Submissions</strong> report<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> trends and concerns within the report are based on information provided by<br />

submitters in their written submissions lodged during the submission period.<br />

Information is accurate at time <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> submission and takes into account changes requested<br />

by parties following close <strong>of</strong> submissions up to 30 August 2012.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 5.2 <strong>of</strong> this report, if a submitter has indicated a position both ‘in full’ and<br />

‘in part’, ‘in full’ has been recorded as their overriding position.<br />

The categorisation <strong>of</strong> information in section 5.5 <strong>of</strong> this report were based on the submitter name on<br />

the submission form and does not reflect if an individual submission refers to businesses or other<br />

types <strong>of</strong> groups in their submission.<br />

It is not unusual for submissions received on notified proposals <strong>of</strong> this nature to cover a broad<br />

range <strong>of</strong> issues and <strong>of</strong>fer differing levels <strong>of</strong> detail. Whilst each submission can be unique, the<br />

summary <strong>of</strong> the submissions necessarily involves a degree <strong>of</strong> generalisation. Summaries are<br />

therefore not a replication <strong>of</strong> the original submission. The original submission should be referred to<br />

at all times for the full content <strong>of</strong> the submission. Full copies <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the submissions are available<br />

as PDF (Portable Document Format) files on the EPA website.<br />

The <strong>Summary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Submissions</strong> table in Appendix Four needs to be regarded with caution. The<br />

analysis is based solely on the content <strong>of</strong> the submission form and the stated position <strong>of</strong> the<br />

submitter. In some cases it is not immediately evident what decision a submitter seeks from the<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Inquiry with respect to the information provided in their submission. If the submitter has<br />

strongly inferred through the reasons for the submission and/or their stated submitter position, the<br />

EPA has interpreted this inference and stated (inferred) in Appendix Four.<br />

4. Introduction<br />

4.1 Background<br />

On 20 April 2012, the <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Protection</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> (EPA) received an application from the<br />

NZTA for a Notice <strong>of</strong> Requirement and 29 Resource Consents ("the matters") for the MacKays to Peka<br />

Peka Expressway Proposal (the proposal).<br />

The proposal involves the construction, operation, and maintenance <strong>of</strong> an approximately 16 km<br />

section <strong>of</strong> State highway, formed to an expressway standard, from 2 kms north <strong>of</strong> MacKays Crossing<br />

to Te Kowhai Road, Peka Peka in the Kāpiti Coast District.<br />

The proposal will provide for an Expressway with two lanes <strong>of</strong> traffic in each direction, connections<br />

with local roads at four interchanges, new local roads and access roads to maintain local connectivity,<br />

and an additional bridge crossing over the Waikanae River.<br />

The EPA recommended to the Minister for the Environment to direct the matters to a board <strong>of</strong> inquiry<br />

for decision. The Minister has accepted the EPA’s recommendation and directed the matters to be<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!