03.01.2013 Views

War Memorial's Daniel Clem - Local History Archives

War Memorial's Daniel Clem - Local History Archives

War Memorial's Daniel Clem - Local History Archives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

iThursday, May 20, 1971<br />

K",.. " tn"e P.. " L.., CO.<br />

._-.' 'r .<br />

::<br />

:(<br />

"<br />

.~ ., .' ••<br />

AUTO LEASING •<br />

ALL. MAKES AND MODELS<br />

: 1 0... Car 01 ""'<br />

~~5550 E, W,rr.n<br />

~. Pelelkr. Mer •<br />

w. C.II AIIjlllt 0.. PIe.<br />

T. Y~r ......<br />

F.atvrin,<br />

Qualte, Maid Kltchana<br />

885.4770<br />

U US .Li ttf. Mac~<br />

St. Clair Shores<br />

• g e.<br />

,i:. k;<br />

GROSSE POINTE NEWS<br />

' S been DO effort mad. to inlti-<br />

Arnold Fue hs rotements tute der,wJratel)' Deeded aDd<br />

10Dl overdue f1sell reform iD<br />

Ch,allenged By Glancy ~,,~~l~~Dd. Il~U:SJ;<br />

By<br />

The<br />

Board<br />

ju.t make th1I community<br />

Pepper Whitelaw 1 that unless it Is adoC~ed by moM~. ctt:1~r:::Ul~al:ot )I~ns;~~<br />

regular meetine of the ~he Board ... tonlg •h' i n1aht tblt thlJ .tatement of<br />

of Education on Mon. m total ',' . that the sc: 00 Xr. Fuchs' ,hocked him .1.<br />

day lIIay 10 was such a<br />

lengthy one the NEWS was<br />

unable to report all the "hap.<br />

system will be in I de!1~I~ mOlItmore than anything elle<br />

st!"t;, next ye~~, of lome , rucbl said. ''The ImpUc.Uot1<br />

million dollars. 01 that ,tatement it that we<br />

penings" in last week's issue. "The recommendation II' do not run • t!aht II.cal .hip,<br />

In keeping with our policy of sumes that we. wilJ lose rev. that we do not maint.in Ill)<br />

providing "in -iept.h" cover8ge en,ue from state aid in the impeccably accurat, ,ingle set<br />

of the meetings. we take this neighborhood of, one million of book., that our finandal<br />

opportunity<br />

Allred R,<br />

to report trustee dollars.<br />

Glancy, Jr.'s reo I agrt~<br />

We don t know tbis.<br />

there are indications<br />

and bu,ine ..<br />

th<br />

aUalrs<br />

Is'<br />

are<br />

f<br />

not<br />

buttal to a statement made by that the State aid will be cut ::::i:ated ea:~~C:ntO s~<br />

vice.president, Arnold Fuchs,<br />

at the April 5 meeting and<br />

later distributed under the<br />

names of Donald J. Semmler,<br />

to some extent, but no, one,<br />

least of all the admlnistrators<br />

making this recommenda.<br />

lion, C8n assure us, at this<br />

II IDy [ know in my own busi-<br />

Uill ti "M GI<br />

neS8 a a 0tlI. r. anc)'<br />

then commented 011 ~ tact<br />

Calvin Sandberg and Mr. time, that ,~he cut will be ~~~~pen::~; ~~:1h.m:i<br />

Fuchs. throughout the com.<br />

munity,<br />

In that printed report it<br />

was stated: "Since the 'local<br />

press' dill not see £it to publish<br />

the comments of vice.<br />

that severe. Ithis. (We rellOrted these con.-<br />

Mr. Glancy, Monday eye' flrmatlons In Il8t week',<br />

ning, in his rebuttal, s~ld: issue)<br />

"Mr, Fuchs seems to obl~ct Mr.' Glancy Slid "these 1m.<br />

to the fact that the admm •. plicatfons will do more than<br />

istration assumes that we, may IanytbiDg elM to completely<br />

president Fuchs, 'We have lose as muc~ as one million destroy the eommunity's con.<br />

taken this opportunity to re- f~om sta~ aid, .t t,he same fidence in the scbooJ system<br />

lay his comments to you."<br />

The Fuchs. Semmler. Sand.<br />

tune o{fermg no estimate of<br />

any amount as an alternative.<br />

and In the board of trustees<br />

and any trustee, or group of<br />

berg report referred to Dr. ~s of ~prU 5, based OD aU trustees, who make such a<br />

Theos 1. Anderson's recom- mformatlon on hand at that charge by these impUcations<br />

:Yes.<br />

.:<br />

:{;enerutions of Christiull Sdcntists throughout<br />

mendalion for staff<br />

which Mr, Fuchs<br />

Semmler opposed<br />

reduction<br />

and ~tr,<br />

and Mr.<br />

time, when It .was ~~cessary<br />

to make a baSIC deCISIOnper.<br />

~aining to Olle of the most<br />

is unworthy to bold office, and<br />

1 am making this statement<br />

in public and Cor the record."<br />

ithe world<br />

:"<br />

,~iseasc<br />

have<br />

even<br />

been healed of every kind of<br />

'" bl .. h<br />

meura e disease -- throug.<br />

Sandberg abstained from sup.<br />

porting at the April 5 meet.<br />

Important. ~ertainly .one ~f<br />

the largest It~IS which will<br />

be part of the new budget, t~e<br />

Mr. Fuchs<br />

amendments<br />

intendent's<br />

suuested three<br />

to the superreeommendatiOllI<br />

;~od's help alone. By using the same method that 1l1~Ionday evening, !\Ir. Glancy administration had to ta~e th~ at the April 5 meeting. Mr.<br />

;~:hrjst Jesus taught and proved.<br />

I,<br />

k:ome this Wednesday to our public testimony<br />

'. II h<br />

'.:<br />

l'eferred to this "co,sponsored<br />

statement" as "a carefully<br />

edited version of the actual<br />

statrnent made by Mr. Fuchs<br />

figure, not a more optimishc<br />

one,", ' ,<br />

Fuchs report also. state~.<br />

"The recommenda~l~m 15<br />

Glancy commenteU 011 those at<br />

last Monday's meet1nf.<br />

Mr. Fuehs first amendment<br />

was "This board will adopt<br />

tIl1eeting. You can hear your neighbors te w Y<br />

'Y<br />

~(iley've turned to God for health and their<br />

at the meeting of April 5 and<br />

indicated that the tapes of<br />

b sed on the sUPPosition that<br />

a. ..<br />

our local revenues w~ be m.<br />

bud<br />

the concept for zero get.<br />

ing tor the '71 alld '72 and<br />

~piritl1al well-being.<br />

I,<br />

1(,' h. - Sc- \A.["'.Jnesday<br />

:, nstian lence Vn=\)<br />

E.<br />

vemng<br />

that meeting were proof of<br />

this. :Mr. Fuchs did not re.<br />

spond to }(r. Glancy's reo<br />

crease only some e1~h~ per.<br />

cent by the re~ent ral,'llDg of<br />

S t,a t e 'Equalized Vr.luation<br />

ra.t~er than the 1~ percent<br />

all subsequent budgets."<br />

Mr. G la n c y said "this<br />

amendment which pertains to<br />

something Mr. Fuclls cans<br />

(Testimony Meetings ,~"""'1 m~~. Fuch's statement said: Orlgmally f~re,cas~. Right now, "zero budget," is a phrase I<br />

l: ' [fJ', "Perhaps mj' major objection th~re ar~ md1cutions ~at the find difficult to idenWy with<br />

'"FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST, SCIENTIST =, -; to the proposal is that it can. false will be less tuan 12 any bUdgetary procedures<br />

... ,.. .. ' .. nle fou,.. 2.2 CNifertI Av.. ~ ; not be fl"nancl'ally substanti .. percent~ bu:t t~ere al't: e~ua~y with which I nm fimlliar. The<br />

~ ISunJn Sc:BI(~ &: SunJ.a\ S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!