Worldwide Open Proficiency Test: Determination of ... - Nucleus - IAEA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[Bq/kg] 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 137 241 37 223 246 112 120 161 4165 207 197 264 26 294 80 17 77 36 211 41 88 91 227 72 124 71 90 237 296 221 239 193 68 258 32 217 76 179 269 11 53 94 200 219 44 220 46 267 113 40 62 712 254 87 64 99 172 245 386 265 123 60 16 18 169 20 79 84 276 27 24 10 134 119 232 288 1275 63 65 70 138 170 45 127 218 290 272 300 178 31 216 93 101 199 292 293 133 163 650 22 284 58 274 177 191 171 23 285 19 140 39 192 253 51 251 159 260 166 125 295 263 144 59 238 122 194 130 5168 126 201 160 61 195 181 56 13 52 152 252 209 277 278 297 173 289 154 244 131 110 249 202 183 132 250 185 234 153 174 157 261 150 82 242 15 164 43 106 240 235 47 151 190 97 283 38 14 109 225 279 210 273 136 121 Lab code Draft, page 86 Rep. Value Performance evaluation <strong>of</strong> Ra-226 measurement results Rep. Unc. <strong>IAEA</strong>-447 Moss-soil reference material Unc. [%] Target Value: 25.1 ± 2.0 [Bq/kg] N 40% Rel. Bias W 8% A 52% Ra-226 in moss-soil Laboratory code A1 A2 True P Prec Final Score 1 25.75 1.94 7.53 2.59 0.6 7.2 A 11.0 A A 3 24 4 16.67 -4.38 1.1 11.5 A 18.5 A A 4 17.4 1.6 9.20 -30.68 7.7 6.6 N 12.2 A N 5 38 9 23.68 51.39 12.9 23.8 A 25.0 N N 6 28.1 5.8 20.64 11.95 3.0 15.8 A 22.1 N W 7 22.89 1.1 4.81 -8.80 2.2 5.9 A 9.3 A A 10 25.4 0.48 1.89 1.20 0.3 5.3 A 8.2 A A 11 21.9 2.4 10.96 -12.75 3.2 8.1 A 13.5 A A 12 23 1 4.35 -8.37 2.1 5.8 A 9.1 A A 13 44.51 6.42 14.42 77.33 19.4 17.3 N 16.5 A N 14 117 8.53 7.29 366.14 91.9 22.6 N 10.8 A N 83
Lab code Rep. Value Rep. Unc. Unc. [%] Rel. Bias A1 A2 True P Prec Final Score 15 75.52 15.95 21.12 200.88 50.4 41.5 N 22.6 N N 16 24.5 1.3 5.31 -2.39 0.6 6.2 A 9.6 A A 17 19.5 2.7 13.85 -22.31 5.6 8.7 A 16.0 A A 18 24.7 1.4 5.67 -1.59 0.4 6.3 A 9.8 A A 19 30 1.6 5.33 19.52 4.9 6.6 A 9.6 A A 20 24.9 1.3 5.22 -0.80 0.2 6.2 A 9.5 A A 22 28.4 0.9 3.17 13.15 3.3 5.7 A 8.6 A A 23 29.6 2.8 9.46 17.93 4.5 8.9 A 12.4 A A 24 25.3 1.2 4.74 0.80 0.2 6.0 A 9.3 A A 26 19 2.44 12.84 -24.30 6.1 8.1 A 15.1 A A 27 25.11 3.416 13.60 0.06 0.0 10.2 A 15.8 A A 31 26.7 1.7 6.37 6.37 1.6 6.8 A 10.2 A A 32 21.3 0.8 3.76 -15.14 3.8 5.6 A 8.8 A A 36 19.9 10 50.25 -20.72 5.2 26.3 A 50.9 N N 37 14.43 3.07 21.28 -42.51 10.7 9.5 N 22.7 N N 38 111 0.007 0.01 342.23 85.9 5.2 N 8.0 A N 39 31 5 16.13 23.51 5.9 13.9 A 18.0 A A 40 22.8 3.6 15.79 -9.16 2.3 10.6 A 17.7 A A 41 20 4 20.00 -20.32 5.1 11.5 A 21.5 N N 43 76 11 14.47 202.79 50.9 28.8 N 16.5 A N 44 22.07 1.32 5.98 -12.07 3.0 6.2 A 10.0 A A 45 26.2 0.9 3.44 4.38 1.1 5.7 A 8.7 A A 46 22.4 0.76 3.39 -10.76 2.7 5.5 A 8.7 A A 47 86.4 17.8 20.60 244.22 61.3 46.2 N 22.1 N N 50 28.2 2.8 9.93 12.35 3.1 8.9 A 12.7 A A 51 31.1 2.7 8.68 23.90 6.0 8.7 A 11.8 A A 52 45 6 13.33 79.28 19.9 16.3 N 15.5 A N 53 21.9 0.8 3.65 -12.75 3.2 5.6 A 8.8 A A 56 44 3 6.82 75.30 18.9 9.3 N 10.5 A N 58 28.5 1.5 5.26 13.55 3.4 6.5 A 9.5 A A 59 34.2 2 5.85 36.25 9.1 7.3 N 9.9 A N 60 24.4 0.5 2.05 -2.79 0.7 5.3 A 8.2 A A 61 40 6.6 16.50 59.36 14.9 17.8 A 18.3 A A 62 22.8 1.08 4.74 -9.16 2.3 5.9 A 9.3 A A 63 25.89 2.03 7.84 3.15 0.8 7.4 A 11.2 A A 64 23.46 1.33 5.67 -6.53 1.6 6.2 A 9.8 A A 65 25.9 2.3 8.88 3.19 0.8 7.9 A 11.9 A A 68 21.2 1.6 7.55 -15.54 3.9 6.6 A 11.0 A A 70 26 5 19.23 3.59 0.9 13.9 A 20.8 N W 71 20.6 0.9 4.37 -17.93 4.5 5.7 A 9.1 A A 72 20.3 2.29 11.28 -19.12 4.8 7.8 A 13.8 A A 76 21.6 7.1 32.87 -13.94 3.5 19.0 A 33.8 N W 77 19.82 0.59 2.98 -21.04 5.3 5.4 A 8.5 A A 79 25 1.8 7.20 -0.40 0.1 6.9 A 10.7 A A 80 19.3 3.1 16.06 -23.11 5.8 9.5 A 17.9 A A 82 70.09 9.15 13.05 179.24 45.0 24.2 N 15.3 A N 83
Page 1 and 2:
IAEA Analytical Quality in Nuclear
Page 3 and 4:
FOREWORD A reliable determination o
Page 5 and 6:
1. INTRODUCTION A reliable determin
Page 7 and 8:
2.1. Proficiency test objectives 2.
Page 9 and 10:
To confirm the assigned target valu
Page 11 and 12:
program achieving complete sample d
Page 13 and 14:
2.3.4.3. Determination of U-234, U-
Page 15 and 16:
AlphaCounts per channel 2000 1500 1
Page 17 and 18:
3. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Several rat
Page 19 and 20:
acceptable”, a further check is a
Page 21 and 22:
TABLE 4. SUMMARY EVALUATION OF ALL
Page 23 and 24:
Lab. code Number of reported Scored
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
4.2. General recommendations and le
Page 31 and 32:
Difference S2-S4 (%) Difference S2-
Page 33 and 34:
4.4. Recommendations related to the
Page 35 and 36:
[Bq/kg] 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Ra-2
Page 37 and 38: Figure 22: Part of the Thorium radi
Page 39 and 40: 5. CONCLUSIONS The IAEA-CU-2009-03
Page 41 and 42: REFERENCES [1] DUEWER, D.L., A Robu
Page 43 and 44: APPENDIX I: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Page 45 and 46: Lab code Rep. Value Rep. Unc. Unc.
Page 67 and 68: [Bq/kg] 650 575 500 425 350 275 200
Page 69 and 70: [Bq/kg] 650 600 550 500 450 400 350
Page 71 and 72: [ B q /k g ] 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 L
Page 87: Lab code Rep. Value Rep. Unc. Unc.
Page 93 and 94: [Bq] 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 120
Page 95 and 96: [Bq/kg] 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 25 223
Page 101 and 102: [ B q /k g ] 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 72
Page 117 and 118: [Bq/kg] 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 74 131 2
Page 123 and 124: [Bq/kg] 45 41 37 33 29 25 21 17 13
Page 139 and 140:
[Bq/kg ] 19 17 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 286
Page 141 and 142:
Lab code Rep. Value Rep. Unc. Unc.
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
[Bq/kg] 19 17 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 25
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
[ B q /k g ] 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
[ B q /k g ] 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
[Bq /kg ] 8.5 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 2
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
[Bq/kg] 7.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 2.5 1.5
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
[B q /k g ] 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 515 26
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
[Bq /kg ] 11 9 7 5 3 1 219 250 233
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
[Bq/kg] 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 273 5264 26
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
APPENDIX II: LIST OF PARTICIPATING
Page 227 and 228:
Dr. Victor Badulin Public Exposure
Page 229 and 230:
Dr. David Lobb Department of Soil S
Page 231 and 232:
Petr Rulik Monitoring Department Na
Page 233 and 234:
Mr. Benoit Daniel Eichrom Europe Ru
Page 235 and 236:
Prof. Dr. Constantin Papastefanou A
Page 237 and 238:
Mr. A.G. Hegde Health Physics Divis
Page 239 and 240:
Mr. Mario Montalto Istituto Di Radi
Page 241 and 242:
Mr. Samer J. Al-Kharouf Radiation P
Page 243 and 244:
Ms. Snezana Dimovska Radioecology R
Page 245 and 246:
Dr. Andrzej Komosa Department of Ra
Page 247 and 248:
Ms. Ana-Maria Apostu Dept. of Life
Page 249 and 250:
Mr. Peter Jovanovic Department of P
Page 251 and 252:
Dr. Catalina Gasco Leonarte Ed. 3a
Page 253 and 254:
Dra. Montserrat Llaurado Departamen
Page 255 and 256:
Mr. Abdullah Dirican Turkish Atomic
Page 257 and 258:
Dr. Paul Smedley Centre For Environ
Page 259 and 260:
Mr. Kevin T. Claver Environmental A
Page 261 and 262:
259
show all

Worldwide Open Proficiency Test: Determination of ... - Nucleus - IAEA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?