eastern district of wisconsin milwaukee county, employee
eastern district of wisconsin milwaukee county, employee
eastern district of wisconsin milwaukee county, employee
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
elied on Mercer’s advice, much less a majority. Instead, the Plaintiffs’ case is an after-the-fact<br />
fabrication in an attempt to scapegoat Mercer and to shift blame away from the mistakes <strong>of</strong><br />
County personnel like Dobbert and the County Board’s own lack <strong>of</strong> oversight in connection with<br />
the enactment <strong>of</strong> the 2001-2004 Wage and Benefit Package.<br />
the Complaint.<br />
For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment should be granted to Mercer dismissing<br />
QBACTIVE\6280487.1 52<br />
s/ Eric J. Van Vugt<br />
Paul D. Bauer<br />
Joshua D. Maggard<br />
Valerie P. Vidal<br />
QUARLES & BRADY LLP<br />
411 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2040<br />
Milwaukee, WI 53202-4497<br />
(414) 277-5625<br />
ejv@quarles.com<br />
Attorneys for Mercer Human Resource<br />
Consulting, Inc.<br />
Case 2:06-cv-00372-CNC Filed 06/09/2008 Page 52 <strong>of</strong> 52 Document 110
Change language