social welfare research institute - Boston College

More documents

Recommendations

Info

We are grateful to HNW Digital Inc., the Institutional Investor, Dr. Charles Maclean of PhilanthropyNow, the Morino Institute, Social Venture Partners, Seattle, and the Third Wave Foundation for sharing so generously with us the fruits of their research; to NewProfit Inc., the Northwest Giving Project, Social Venture Partners, and our anonymous informants for being so forthcoming with their time and thoughts. We also would like to express our gratitude to Maria Aiello, Kelly Fargo, Mark McGregor, Meghan McGuinness, Caroline Noonan, Shelley-Ann Quilty, Jill Weidner, and Daniele Wilson, without whose competent and dedicated research assistance, this project would not have succeeded. 3
Introduction The 2001 High-Tech Donors Study was carried out from January through March 2001 by Paul G. Schervish, Mary A. O’Herlihy, and John J. Havens of the Boston College Social Welfare Research Institute. The research was conducted on behalf of the Association of Fundraising Professionals (formerly the National Society of Fund Raising Executives); and was initiated and funded by Dr. Robert B. Pamplin, Jr., President and CEO of the R.B. Pamplin Corporation in Portland, Oregon. The leading questions of the research revolved around discerning: 1. the relationship between how high-tech wealth holders accumulate their money in business and how they allocate it to philanthropy; 2. the range of personal, business, and philanthropic issues that surround high- tech wealth and philanthropy; 3. the implications of the findings for understanding and improving the trajectory of the philanthropy carried out by high-tech donors; and 4. the application of what we learn to further our understanding of the emerging problems and prospects of philanthropy in general. 4
Page 1 and 2: social welfare research institute A
Page 3: Acknowledgements As with all resear
Page 7 and 8: unique is that so many individuals,
Page 9 and 10: I. The Research Landscape We begin
Page 11 and 12: Our review of the various lists ava
Page 13 and 14: Academic Research We then moved to
Page 15 and 16: A strong theme in the reports is th
Page 17 and 18: the material, associative, aestheti
Page 19 and 20: oth reports proved helpful to us fo
Page 21 and 22: • the discernment model rather th
Page 23 and 24: II. Research Design, Definitions, M
Page 25 and 26: Given our small sample, it did not
Page 27 and 28: Contacting Participants We began th
Page 29 and 30: into participants, and one of these
Page 31 and 32: spouses was directly associated wit
Page 33 and 34: family annual income and family net
Page 35 and 36: median of $750,000 for the 24 famil
Page 37 and 38: Nearly all the high-tech wealth hol
Page 39 and 40: interviews will yield decreasing am
Page 41 and 42: throughout the twentieth century, v
Page 43 and 44: put a lot of their resources into a
Page 45 and 46: economy. Agent-animated production
Page 47 and 48: capacity. And I wanted to do it all
Page 49 and 50: Rather, their desire to mould the p
Page 51 and 52: 3. to constantly monitor and nimbly
Page 53 and 54: workers with exceptional intellectu
Page 55 and 56:
3. being resolute about growth of s
Page 57 and 58:
have become stuck in old perception
Page 59 and 60:
unimportant; it is that good ideas
Page 61 and 62:
What I was very clear to do in putt
Page 63 and 64:
nonprofits to develop their organiz
Page 65 and 66:
that in life they have been dealt a
Page 67 and 68:
learn how to receive them. The most
Page 69 and 70:
organizations receive his major con
Page 71 and 72:
Because care is the assistance of o
Page 73 and 74:
come from living and conducting bus
Page 75 and 76:
Ultimately there is nothing mysteri
Page 77 and 78:
intercessional forms of philanthrop
Page 79 and 80:
The distinctive class trait of the
Page 81 and 82:
there will have been a product that
Page 83 and 84:
decisions, thinking about problems
Page 85 and 86:
venture philanthropy is more accura
Page 87 and 88:
The Emerging Vocation of Philanthro
Page 89 and 90:
e, what is currently being done by
Page 91 and 92:
expectation, confidence, and capaci
Page 93 and 94:
A third special expression of care
Page 95 and 96:
Note that the issue of care and dom
Page 97 and 98:
social change than has heretofore o
Page 99 and 100:
Thus, for most of them, their socia
Page 101 and 102:
and overwhelmingly concerned to edu
Page 103 and 104:
dynamics of liberty and inspiration
Page 105 and 106:
Per Email: January 25, 2001 Social
Page 107 and 108:
The Philanthropic Strategies of Hig
Page 109 and 110:
108 has written thirteen books and
Page 111 and 112:
3. Or mail it to: Mary O'Herlihy So
Page 113 and 114:
B. RECIPIENT: AMOUNT: PURPOSE OF GI
Page 115 and 116:
The portion that has been gained th
Page 117 and 118:
17. Where did you grow up? City: St
Page 119 and 120:
Bibliography Aquinas, St. Thomas. T
Page 121 and 122:
Fortune.com. 2001. America’s 50 M
Page 123 and 124:
Reis, Tom, and Stephanie Clohesy. 1
Page 125 and 126:
Schervish, Paul G., Platon E. Couts
Page 127 and 128:
Paul G. Schervish Profiles of Autho
Page 129 and 130:
Mary A. O'Herlihy, Project Director
Page 131 and 132:
From September 1992 to the present,
show all

social welfare research institute - Boston College

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?