Clayton Falls Project Water Use Plan Aquatic - BC Hydro
Clayton Falls Project Water Use Plan Aquatic - BC Hydro
Clayton Falls Project Water Use Plan Aquatic - BC Hydro
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Clayton</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> WUP <strong>Aquatic</strong> Productivity Monitoring Program – Year 1, 2005<br />
Invertebrate Taxonomy Results (February 26, 2006)<br />
Upon preliminary sample assessment by taxonomists it was determined species identification<br />
would be completed on all samples collected at Reach 2 (six samples, February 26, 2006).<br />
Owing to limited numbers of specimens collected in the sample baskets it was well within the<br />
scope and budget of the project to complete taxonomic identification of specimens from all six<br />
samples from Reach 2 (Site CF1); however, it was not considered that there was enough data<br />
for full taxonomic assessment (e.g., species density, life stage use, etc.).<br />
<strong>Aquatic</strong> invertebrates were identified to species where possible. Identification to species level<br />
was contingent upon the life stage of the nymph or larva. Mature larvae in their final stage(s) of<br />
development are typically most readily identifiable to species level. Earlier stages (instars) in<br />
those samples collected were identified to Genus level. In some cases (e.g., caddis, blackfly<br />
and Chironomid larvae), specimens were identified to Family level. Refer to the attached<br />
PowerPoint document for photographs of all aquatic invertebrates collected as well as a typical<br />
sample site.<br />
The three primary aquatic insect Orders Ephemeroptera, Plectoptera, Trichoptera (May, Stone<br />
and Caddis flies) most often associated with fish habitat utilization were represented in samples<br />
taken from <strong>Clayton</strong> Creek. Representatives from the Dipteran Order (i.e. Simuliids; Blackfly<br />
larvae and Chironomids; non-biting Midge larvae) were also recorded.<br />
All specimens collected were in various stages of development. The variance was due to<br />
emergence times of particular species. It was noted a stonefly such as Zapada cinctipes, which<br />
is generally in the “winter stonefly” group, would be expected to be mature in development in<br />
Late February, and subsequently was recorded as such in specimens sampled. Mid to late<br />
spring emerging insects such as the mayflies Rithrogena sp., Ironopsis grandis, Cinygmula sp.<br />
and Ameletus sp. were in intermediate stages of development as would be expected at the<br />
sample period (late February).<br />
The presence of such species as Cinygmula sp., Ironopsis grandis and Rithrogena sp.,<br />
mayflies as well as stonefly specimens typically indicates good water quality, since these<br />
aquatic invertebrates are often the first to disappear when such stressors as high water temp.,<br />
low oxygen and toxins are present.<br />
Generally the composition and diversity of specimens observed from the <strong>Clayton</strong> Creek<br />
samples indicated a relatively diverse benthic invertebrate population; however, quantitative<br />
data could not be assessed or inferred from samples collected.<br />
Collection methods were problematic for invertebrate collection in <strong>Clayton</strong> Creek. The planted<br />
baskets were undersized and limited sample substrate size. This may have limited colonization<br />
(in terms of species diversity and numbers) within the basket for aquatic invertebrates as the<br />
substrate in this stream reach is comprised predominantly of cobble and boulder, which is much<br />
more stable as refuge when compared to the planted baskets.<br />
Kynoch Resources<br />
11