16.01.2013 Views

Clayton Falls Project Water Use Plan Aquatic - BC Hydro

Clayton Falls Project Water Use Plan Aquatic - BC Hydro

Clayton Falls Project Water Use Plan Aquatic - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Clayton</strong> <strong>Falls</strong> WUP <strong>Aquatic</strong> Productivity Monitoring Program – Year 1, 2005<br />

Invertebrate Taxonomy Results (February 26, 2006)<br />

Upon preliminary sample assessment by taxonomists it was determined species identification<br />

would be completed on all samples collected at Reach 2 (six samples, February 26, 2006).<br />

Owing to limited numbers of specimens collected in the sample baskets it was well within the<br />

scope and budget of the project to complete taxonomic identification of specimens from all six<br />

samples from Reach 2 (Site CF1); however, it was not considered that there was enough data<br />

for full taxonomic assessment (e.g., species density, life stage use, etc.).<br />

<strong>Aquatic</strong> invertebrates were identified to species where possible. Identification to species level<br />

was contingent upon the life stage of the nymph or larva. Mature larvae in their final stage(s) of<br />

development are typically most readily identifiable to species level. Earlier stages (instars) in<br />

those samples collected were identified to Genus level. In some cases (e.g., caddis, blackfly<br />

and Chironomid larvae), specimens were identified to Family level. Refer to the attached<br />

PowerPoint document for photographs of all aquatic invertebrates collected as well as a typical<br />

sample site.<br />

The three primary aquatic insect Orders Ephemeroptera, Plectoptera, Trichoptera (May, Stone<br />

and Caddis flies) most often associated with fish habitat utilization were represented in samples<br />

taken from <strong>Clayton</strong> Creek. Representatives from the Dipteran Order (i.e. Simuliids; Blackfly<br />

larvae and Chironomids; non-biting Midge larvae) were also recorded.<br />

All specimens collected were in various stages of development. The variance was due to<br />

emergence times of particular species. It was noted a stonefly such as Zapada cinctipes, which<br />

is generally in the “winter stonefly” group, would be expected to be mature in development in<br />

Late February, and subsequently was recorded as such in specimens sampled. Mid to late<br />

spring emerging insects such as the mayflies Rithrogena sp., Ironopsis grandis, Cinygmula sp.<br />

and Ameletus sp. were in intermediate stages of development as would be expected at the<br />

sample period (late February).<br />

The presence of such species as Cinygmula sp., Ironopsis grandis and Rithrogena sp.,<br />

mayflies as well as stonefly specimens typically indicates good water quality, since these<br />

aquatic invertebrates are often the first to disappear when such stressors as high water temp.,<br />

low oxygen and toxins are present.<br />

Generally the composition and diversity of specimens observed from the <strong>Clayton</strong> Creek<br />

samples indicated a relatively diverse benthic invertebrate population; however, quantitative<br />

data could not be assessed or inferred from samples collected.<br />

Collection methods were problematic for invertebrate collection in <strong>Clayton</strong> Creek. The planted<br />

baskets were undersized and limited sample substrate size. This may have limited colonization<br />

(in terms of species diversity and numbers) within the basket for aquatic invertebrates as the<br />

substrate in this stream reach is comprised predominantly of cobble and boulder, which is much<br />

more stable as refuge when compared to the planted baskets.<br />

Kynoch Resources<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!