16.01.2013 Views

Falls River Project Water Use Plan Falls River Fish ... - BC Hydro

Falls River Project Water Use Plan Falls River Fish ... - BC Hydro

Falls River Project Water Use Plan Falls River Fish ... - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Falls</strong> <strong>River</strong> WUP Monitoring 2008/2009<br />

2.3.2 Data Analysis<br />

To analyze the effect of total discharge rate on water levels, tidal influence was detached from the<br />

water depth data in the study area. Hourly tide chart readings (Appendix II) were cross referenced<br />

with actual water levels (hourly data obtained from the pressure transducer) and tidal peaks<br />

(considered ‘noise’) were manually identified. Data points which were exaggerated by tidal influence<br />

were excluded from the data-set to reduce noise and augment the underlying data analysis.<br />

Pearson’s product-moment correlation analyses were then applied to the discharge/water level data<br />

to determine if a linear relation exists between total discharge levels and water depth in the tailpond.<br />

2.4 Substrate Composition (Wolman Pebble Counts)<br />

The particle size characteristics and potential temporal changes of particle size at each sample site<br />

were assessed using modified Wolman pebble counts (Wolman 1954). The Wolman pebble count<br />

involves a surveyor following a transect across a river stream width with heel/toe steps, picking up<br />

the first particle touched by a pointed index finger at the tip of the boot. This is performed until 100<br />

particles are measured. Since our study areas and sample sites were relatively small, we used a grab<br />

technique where the observer sampled as much substrate at each sample site (n=9), that could be<br />

held in both hands. The sample was then taken to the shoreline, where the intermediate diameter of<br />

each selected particle was measured with a gravelometer (a piece of aluminum metal with 14 square<br />

holes of common sieve sizes (1/2-phi unit classes) ranging from 2 mm to 180 mm). This was<br />

performed until 100 particles were measured. The Wolman pebble counts were conducted 3 times<br />

during the study: at the eyed stage (September 23 rd –October 27 th , 2008), February 19 th , 2009,<br />

and at the emergence stage (early May 12 th , 15 th , 2009).The crew member completing this task<br />

differed between the three sampling periods; however, on a survey date the same observer was used<br />

at all 9 sites to sample the substrate. See Figure 8 (e and f) for photos of substrate sampling, as well<br />

as an overhead view of the surface substrate at incubation area 2 (photo d).<br />

Data from the Wolman pebble count were arranged and analyzed according to size (13 size classes,<br />

ranging from 2.8 to 180 mm). The percent frequency and cumulative percent finer for each size<br />

class were then calculated and plotted (cumulative frequency curve and particle size histogram).<br />

Cambria Gordon and Metlakata <strong>Fish</strong>eries 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!