16.01.2013 Views

Falls River Project Water Use Plan Falls River Fish ... - BC Hydro

Falls River Project Water Use Plan Falls River Fish ... - BC Hydro

Falls River Project Water Use Plan Falls River Fish ... - BC Hydro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Falls</strong> <strong>River</strong> WUP Monitoring 2008/2009<br />

Avg. daily discharge (cms)<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

10/09/08<br />

6.5 cms -<br />

min<br />

discharge<br />

Aug 1st -<br />

Oct 15th<br />

(WUP)<br />

20/09/08<br />

30/09/08<br />

10/10/08<br />

20/10/08<br />

30/10/08<br />

09/11/08<br />

19/11/08<br />

29/11/08<br />

09/12/08<br />

19/12/08<br />

29/12/08<br />

08/01/09<br />

Cambria Gordon and Metlakata <strong>Fish</strong>eries 22<br />

18/01/09<br />

28/01/09<br />

Date<br />

07/02/09<br />

17/02/09<br />

27/02/09<br />

2.6 cms - min<br />

discharge year<br />

round for reservoir<br />

elevation > 88.4m<br />

(WUP)<br />

Figure 11: <strong>Falls</strong> <strong>River</strong> average daily discharge (total outflow from turbines and spillway) from September 23,<br />

2008 to May 21, 2009. Red line displays the WUP recommended minimums discharge during the salmon<br />

spawning period (6.5 cms – August 1 st to October 15 th ) and year round minimum discharge (2.6 cms). If the<br />

reservoir elevation drops below 88.4 m, turbine discharge will be reduced to 1.3 cms to conserve water and<br />

ensure that some flows to the river can be maintained (<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> 2006a). Data is not available from Dec 28 th ,<br />

2008 – Jan 6 th , 2009.<br />

3.3.1 Stage/Discharge Relationship<br />

We used the dataset of hourly depth and associated hourly discharge to attempt to develop a stage<br />

discharge curve at the site. This analysis provided strong correlations for some months, but weak<br />

correlations for others.<br />

The nine graphs in Figure 12 show the relationship between total discharge into the tailpond and<br />

water depth for the nine sample months. From September to December, 2008 there are strong<br />

positive correlations (R 2 0.936 to 0.977) between adjusted depth data (tidal back flow depths<br />

removed from the dataset) and total discharge. Weak correlations exist between total discharge and<br />

water depth from January to May, 2009 (R 2 = 0.074 to 0.5372). This could be a result of algae<br />

growth and/or debris build-up on the screen of the pipe that houses the transducer and/or ice buildup<br />

on the shoreline affecting representative water depths and/or affecting how discharge is<br />

distributed into the tailpond. Discharge data from the turbines and spillway will also be verified with<br />

<strong>BC</strong> <strong>Hydro</strong> to ensure that flow monitoring was accurate during this period.<br />

09/03/09<br />

19/03/09<br />

29/03/09<br />

08/04/09<br />

18/04/09<br />

28/04/09<br />

08/05/09<br />

18/05/09<br />

28/05/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!