19.01.2013 Views

ALS 2010 Annual Conference Programme - Australian Linguistic ...

ALS 2010 Annual Conference Programme - Australian Linguistic ...

ALS 2010 Annual Conference Programme - Australian Linguistic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hoffmann<br />

Dorothea Hoffmann (University of Manchester)<br />

Dorothea.Hoffmann@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk<br />

Where to, from and through? On the distribution of Path in Motion<br />

Descriptions in Jaminjung and Kriol<br />

This paper deals with the distribution of path in motion events in two <strong>Australian</strong> languages,<br />

namely Jaminjung, a highly endangered Non-Pama-Nyungan Language<br />

and Kriol, an English-lexified Creole both spoken in the Victoria River area in the<br />

Northern Territory.<br />

Ever since Talmy (1985, 2000, 2007) introduced the existence of verb-framed and<br />

satellite- framed languages on the basis of the distribution of manner and path<br />

expressions in languages, the typology has been subject of debate. One major<br />

issue concerns a number of languages which seem to fall outside the typology<br />

in, for example, expressing path information in more than one lexical item within<br />

a clause. It has been observed by Schultze-Berndt (2007) that Jaminjung seems<br />

to fall outside the Talmy-typology. The language expresses (restricted) path information<br />

in an inflecting verb (-uga in example (1) and manner (mingib) as well as<br />

additional path information in an uninflecting coverb (burduj) accompanying the<br />

verb:<br />

(1) mingib=bung<br />

crawl=RESTR<br />

’he took us up crawling’<br />

(ES08_A04_06_0256)<br />

gang-kuga<br />

3SG>1SG-take.PST<br />

burduj<br />

go.up<br />

The concept of path is obligatory in any motion description (Slobin, 1996). However,<br />

languages differ regarding the degree of detailed path description in discourse<br />

(Ibarretxe- Antunano, 2009). A thorough analysis of path description in<br />

discourse must consequently be based on three complementary areas. First, the<br />

verb phrase can be distinguished in terms of ‘minus- and ‘plus’-ground clauses<br />

depending on the number of bare verbs (fall) or verbs with a satellite indicating<br />

the direction of movement (fall down) and verbs that additionally are complemented<br />

by a ground phrase (fall into the river) (Slobin, 1996). Jaminjung seems to<br />

prefer minus ground phrases. However, plus-ground expressions are also possible<br />

as in example (2).<br />

(2) buru-biya<br />

return=NOW<br />

yirr-angga<br />

1PL.EXCL-go.PRS<br />

’let’s go back, up to the school!’<br />

(ES08_A13_01tt.045)<br />

kul-bina<br />

school-ALL<br />

janggagu<br />

up

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!