ALS 2010 Annual Conference Programme - Australian Linguistic ...
ALS 2010 Annual Conference Programme - Australian Linguistic ...
ALS 2010 Annual Conference Programme - Australian Linguistic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hoffmann<br />
Dorothea Hoffmann (University of Manchester)<br />
Dorothea.Hoffmann@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk<br />
Where to, from and through? On the distribution of Path in Motion<br />
Descriptions in Jaminjung and Kriol<br />
This paper deals with the distribution of path in motion events in two <strong>Australian</strong> languages,<br />
namely Jaminjung, a highly endangered Non-Pama-Nyungan Language<br />
and Kriol, an English-lexified Creole both spoken in the Victoria River area in the<br />
Northern Territory.<br />
Ever since Talmy (1985, 2000, 2007) introduced the existence of verb-framed and<br />
satellite- framed languages on the basis of the distribution of manner and path<br />
expressions in languages, the typology has been subject of debate. One major<br />
issue concerns a number of languages which seem to fall outside the typology<br />
in, for example, expressing path information in more than one lexical item within<br />
a clause. It has been observed by Schultze-Berndt (2007) that Jaminjung seems<br />
to fall outside the Talmy-typology. The language expresses (restricted) path information<br />
in an inflecting verb (-uga in example (1) and manner (mingib) as well as<br />
additional path information in an uninflecting coverb (burduj) accompanying the<br />
verb:<br />
(1) mingib=bung<br />
crawl=RESTR<br />
’he took us up crawling’<br />
(ES08_A04_06_0256)<br />
gang-kuga<br />
3SG>1SG-take.PST<br />
burduj<br />
go.up<br />
The concept of path is obligatory in any motion description (Slobin, 1996). However,<br />
languages differ regarding the degree of detailed path description in discourse<br />
(Ibarretxe- Antunano, 2009). A thorough analysis of path description in<br />
discourse must consequently be based on three complementary areas. First, the<br />
verb phrase can be distinguished in terms of ‘minus- and ‘plus’-ground clauses<br />
depending on the number of bare verbs (fall) or verbs with a satellite indicating<br />
the direction of movement (fall down) and verbs that additionally are complemented<br />
by a ground phrase (fall into the river) (Slobin, 1996). Jaminjung seems to<br />
prefer minus ground phrases. However, plus-ground expressions are also possible<br />
as in example (2).<br />
(2) buru-biya<br />
return=NOW<br />
yirr-angga<br />
1PL.EXCL-go.PRS<br />
’let’s go back, up to the school!’<br />
(ES08_A13_01tt.045)<br />
kul-bina<br />
school-ALL<br />
janggagu<br />
up