19.01.2013 Views

3 Ngong Ping 360 John Batchelor, Suresh Tank 15 Waste as ... - Arup

3 Ngong Ping 360 John Batchelor, Suresh Tank 15 Waste as ... - Arup

3 Ngong Ping 360 John Batchelor, Suresh Tank 15 Waste as ... - Arup

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

583.5m<br />

Tower 5<br />

44m<br />

Nei Lak Shan angle station<br />

30m 161m<br />

<strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> terminal<br />

575.2m<br />

Prior to any construction works in the <strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong><br />

area, the <strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> stream, which flowed directly<br />

through the site, had to be diverted to run parallel<br />

to the site’s northern boundary and rejoin the<br />

existing watercourse immediately downstream of<br />

the terminal building.<br />

Approximately 390m of banks for the diverted<br />

stream were constructed of rectangular galvanized<br />

steel mesh gabion b<strong>as</strong>kets, filled with crushed rocks<br />

excavated on site (Fig 21). Gabion mattresses for<br />

the stream bed were proposed by the Stage 2<br />

designers, but were replaced by natural crushed<br />

rocks excavated on site to enhance the<br />

environmental and ecological value of the diverted<br />

stream. Additional calculations by <strong>Arup</strong> showed that<br />

the change to the stream bed lining would have no<br />

impact on the stream’s hydraulics. Detail design,<br />

government approval, and construction of the<br />

stream were all completed within five months of<br />

award of contract and before the 2004 rainy se<strong>as</strong>on<br />

commenced (Fig 22).<br />

21. Stream diversion under construction, showing<br />

gabion b<strong>as</strong>kets.<br />

22. <strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> stream diverted.<br />

Tower 6<br />

27m<br />

585.0m<br />

23. <strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> Village: the terminal building is on the right, with <strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> sewerage treatment<br />

works (another <strong>Arup</strong> project) in the background.<br />

The terminal forms the start of the <strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> cultural experience, and this is<br />

reflected in theming to complement the theme village itself. The superstructure of<br />

the latter’s buildings are in concrete with Chinese roof tiles, except for the main<br />

terminal building roof which is of structural steel with a standing seam metal finish.<br />

The terminal building frame is in reinforced concrete with one b<strong>as</strong>ement level.<br />

The terminal building accommodates the ticketing, pre-ride queuing and<br />

<strong>as</strong>sociated retail, covered walkway, plant, administration, and maintenance are<strong>as</strong>.<br />

Emergency vehicle access is provided around the building with the main utilities<br />

laid under footpaths.<br />

<strong>Ngong</strong> <strong>Ping</strong> theme village<br />

The theme village (Fig 23) h<strong>as</strong> three are<strong>as</strong> of one and two-storey buildings with a<br />

traditional regional Chinese character. Maeda and <strong>Arup</strong> opted to replace the steel<br />

frames proposed by the Stage 2 designer with concrete frames to reduce cost and<br />

save time. Most of the design and drawing production for the village w<strong>as</strong> carried<br />

out in <strong>Arup</strong>’s Shenzhen and Manila offices and checked by the Hong Kong office<br />

before being submitted to the BD for approval.<br />

The <strong>Arup</strong> Journal 1/2008 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!