24.01.2013 Views

Governance and finance of long-term care - University of Birmingham

Governance and finance of long-term care - University of Birmingham

Governance and finance of long-term care - University of Birmingham

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Allen et al., 2011 <strong>Governance</strong> <strong>and</strong> Financing <strong>of</strong> LTC | European Overview<br />

5 Finance <strong>and</strong> sustainability<br />

Building on the wider governance context <strong>and</strong> specific areas <strong>of</strong> governance interest (e.g. informal <strong>care</strong>,<br />

volunteering) identified in this report so far, this section looks specifically at some <strong>of</strong> the ways <strong>finance</strong><br />

has been steered in LTC. It explores some <strong>of</strong> the key challenges in financing LTC, including:<br />

• Monitoring financial information where distinct LTC systems are only just emerging <strong>and</strong> where the<br />

budget for LTC is <strong>of</strong>ten fragmented: between health <strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong>; between central, regional <strong>and</strong><br />

local levels; <strong>and</strong> between people classified as having disabilities <strong>and</strong> older people with more<br />

generalised <strong>care</strong> needs.<br />

• Creating equality across services rather than the source <strong>of</strong> funding or entry point influencing the<br />

nature <strong>and</strong> ethos <strong>of</strong> services provided.<br />

• Ensuring effectiveness where many solutions have been temporary solutions rather than<br />

comprehensive reform projects.<br />

• Overcoming culturally specific underst<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>and</strong> strong public opinion about the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

relationship between state, family, employer <strong>and</strong> individual <strong>and</strong> the popularity <strong>of</strong> different funding<br />

systems (e.g. taxation, Insurance, means-­‐testing).<br />

5.1 Public expenditure <strong>and</strong> resources<br />

Within governance in Europe there are few separate national systems or budgets for LTC. This creates a<br />

problem for those monitoring <strong>and</strong> planning <strong>finance</strong>, whereby information can slip into the silos <strong>of</strong> health<br />

<strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong> sectors <strong>and</strong> the real financial activity <strong>and</strong> outcomes for LTC remain hidden. As public<br />

resources are gathered from different budgets, no countries have implemented a completely separate<br />

LTC budget <strong>and</strong> in fact, for most it is difficult to have a clear idea <strong>of</strong> how much is spent on LTC for older<br />

people. Of the countries surveyed Denmark comes closest to having an integrated budget at the local<br />

level for LTC. The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Germany are an exception to this rule with distinct LTC insurance<br />

systems <strong>and</strong> budgets stemming from the Exceptional Medical Expenses Act (NL) <strong>and</strong> LTC Insurance (DE),<br />

respectively. The German LTC insurance demonstrates the tendency towards partial coverage. It only<br />

covers the service part <strong>of</strong> institutional <strong>care</strong>, not accommodation costs, <strong>and</strong> home <strong>care</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> up to 10<br />

hours a week or less are also not covered.<br />

Situated at the boundaries between health <strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong>, LTC services draw resources from both<br />

health <strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong> systems. This means that different funding sources, financing <strong>and</strong> access<br />

principles (see “Access <strong>and</strong> Equity” below) <strong>and</strong> budgets usually apply to LTC within each country,<br />

depending on the nature <strong>of</strong> services involved. Health <strong>care</strong> is usually provided in the framework <strong>of</strong><br />

‘m<strong>and</strong>atory’ universal health insurance (<strong>finance</strong>d generally by obligatory tax or social insurance<br />

contributions), which aims at being comprehensive in the coverage <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

tends to be free at the point <strong>of</strong> delivery. Social <strong>care</strong> services, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, have <strong>of</strong>ten evolved<br />

from social assistance laws. As such their financing relies heavily on tax revenues <strong>and</strong> user’ fees <strong>and</strong><br />

tend to be means tested based on the user <strong>and</strong> their family’s assets.<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!