Governance and finance of long-term care - University of Birmingham
Governance and finance of long-term care - University of Birmingham
Governance and finance of long-term care - University of Birmingham
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Allen et al., 2011 <strong>Governance</strong> <strong>and</strong> Financing <strong>of</strong> LTC | European Overview<br />
5 Finance <strong>and</strong> sustainability<br />
Building on the wider governance context <strong>and</strong> specific areas <strong>of</strong> governance interest (e.g. informal <strong>care</strong>,<br />
volunteering) identified in this report so far, this section looks specifically at some <strong>of</strong> the ways <strong>finance</strong><br />
has been steered in LTC. It explores some <strong>of</strong> the key challenges in financing LTC, including:<br />
• Monitoring financial information where distinct LTC systems are only just emerging <strong>and</strong> where the<br />
budget for LTC is <strong>of</strong>ten fragmented: between health <strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong>; between central, regional <strong>and</strong><br />
local levels; <strong>and</strong> between people classified as having disabilities <strong>and</strong> older people with more<br />
generalised <strong>care</strong> needs.<br />
• Creating equality across services rather than the source <strong>of</strong> funding or entry point influencing the<br />
nature <strong>and</strong> ethos <strong>of</strong> services provided.<br />
• Ensuring effectiveness where many solutions have been temporary solutions rather than<br />
comprehensive reform projects.<br />
• Overcoming culturally specific underst<strong>and</strong>ings <strong>and</strong> strong public opinion about the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
relationship between state, family, employer <strong>and</strong> individual <strong>and</strong> the popularity <strong>of</strong> different funding<br />
systems (e.g. taxation, Insurance, means-‐testing).<br />
5.1 Public expenditure <strong>and</strong> resources<br />
Within governance in Europe there are few separate national systems or budgets for LTC. This creates a<br />
problem for those monitoring <strong>and</strong> planning <strong>finance</strong>, whereby information can slip into the silos <strong>of</strong> health<br />
<strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong> sectors <strong>and</strong> the real financial activity <strong>and</strong> outcomes for LTC remain hidden. As public<br />
resources are gathered from different budgets, no countries have implemented a completely separate<br />
LTC budget <strong>and</strong> in fact, for most it is difficult to have a clear idea <strong>of</strong> how much is spent on LTC for older<br />
people. Of the countries surveyed Denmark comes closest to having an integrated budget at the local<br />
level for LTC. The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Germany are an exception to this rule with distinct LTC insurance<br />
systems <strong>and</strong> budgets stemming from the Exceptional Medical Expenses Act (NL) <strong>and</strong> LTC Insurance (DE),<br />
respectively. The German LTC insurance demonstrates the tendency towards partial coverage. It only<br />
covers the service part <strong>of</strong> institutional <strong>care</strong>, not accommodation costs, <strong>and</strong> home <strong>care</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> up to 10<br />
hours a week or less are also not covered.<br />
Situated at the boundaries between health <strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong>, LTC services draw resources from both<br />
health <strong>and</strong> social <strong>care</strong> systems. This means that different funding sources, financing <strong>and</strong> access<br />
principles (see “Access <strong>and</strong> Equity” below) <strong>and</strong> budgets usually apply to LTC within each country,<br />
depending on the nature <strong>of</strong> services involved. Health <strong>care</strong> is usually provided in the framework <strong>of</strong><br />
‘m<strong>and</strong>atory’ universal health insurance (<strong>finance</strong>d generally by obligatory tax or social insurance<br />
contributions), which aims at being comprehensive in the coverage <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />
tends to be free at the point <strong>of</strong> delivery. Social <strong>care</strong> services, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, have <strong>of</strong>ten evolved<br />
from social assistance laws. As such their financing relies heavily on tax revenues <strong>and</strong> user’ fees <strong>and</strong><br />
tend to be means tested based on the user <strong>and</strong> their family’s assets.<br />
44