RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II - FTP Directory Listing - NATO

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The Research and Technology Organisation (RTO) of NATO RTO is the single focus in NATO for Defence Research and Technology activities. Its mission is to conduct and promote co-operative research and information exchange. The objective is to support the development and effective use of national defence research and technology and to meet the military needs of the Alliance, to maintain a technological lead, and to provide advice to NATO and national decision makers. The RTO performs its mission with the support of an extensive network of national experts. It also ensures effective co-ordination with other NATO bodies involved in R&T activities. RTO reports both to the Military Committee of NATO and to the Conference of National Armament Directors. It comprises a Research and Technology Board (RTB) as the highest level of national representation and the Research and Technology Agency (RTA), a dedicated staff with its headquarters in Neuilly, near Paris, France. In order to facilitate contacts with the military users and other NATO activities, a small part of the RTA staff is located in NATO Headquarters in Brussels. The Brussels staff also co-ordinates RTO’s co-operation with nations in Middle and Eastern Europe, to which RTO attaches particular importance especially as working together in the field of research is one of the more promising areas of co-operation. The total spectrum of R&T activities is covered by the following 7 bodies: • AVT Applied Vehicle Technology Panel • HFM Human Factors and Medicine Panel • IST Information Systems Technology Panel • NMSG NATO Modelling and Simulation Group • SAS System Analysis and Studies Panel • SCI Systems Concepts and Integration Panel • SET Sensors and Electronics Technology Panel These bodies are made up of national representatives as well as generally recognised ‘world class’ scientists. They also provide a communication link to military users and other NATO bodies. RTO’s scientific and technological work is carried out by Technical Teams, created for specific activities and with a specific duration. Such Technical Teams can organise workshops, symposia, field trials, lecture series and training courses. An important function of these Technical Teams is to ensure the continuity of the expert networks. RTO builds upon earlier co-operation in defence research and technology as set-up under the Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) and the Defence Research Group (DRG). AGARD and the DRG share common roots in that they were both established at the initiative of Dr Theodore von Kármán, a leading aerospace scientist, who early on recognised the importance of scientific support for the Allied Armed Forces. RTO is capitalising on these common roots in order to provide the Alliance and the NATO nations with a strong scientific and technological basis that will guarantee a solid base for the future. The content of this publication has been reproduced directly from material supplied by RTO or the authors. Published July 2007 Copyright © RTO/NATO 2007 All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-92-873-0077-7 Single copies of this publication or of a part of it may be made for individual use only. The approval of the RTA Information Management Systems Branch is required for more than one copy to be made or an extract included in another publication. Requests to do so should be sent to the address on the back cover. ii RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II
Table of Contents HFM-121 / RTG-042 Members viii Executive Summary and Synthèse ES-1 Introduction 1-1 Perceptual Issues of Augmented and Virtual Environments 2-1 1.0 Introduction 2-1 2.0 User Characteristics 2-2 3.0 System Characteristics 2-3 4.0 Task Characteristics 2-4 5.0 Perceptual Requirements 2-6 5.1 Visual Requirements 2-6 5.2 Special Visual Issues 2-7 5.2.1 Eye Dominance 2-7 5.2.2 Pupil Adaptation 2-7 5.2.3 Visual Field 2-8 5.2.4 Accommodation 2-8 5.2.5 Sensitivity to Flicker 2-8 5.2.6 Vision Deficiencies 2-8 5.3 Audio Requirements 2-9 5.3.1 Sound Perception 2-9 5.3.2 Sound Processing 2-10 5.4 Haptic Feedback 2-12 5.5 Olfactory Feedback 2-15 6.0 References 2-15 Presence 3-1 1.0 Introduction 3-1 2.0 Theories, Definitions, and Multi-Dimensionality 3-1 3.0 Effects of Presence 3-3 4.0 Measurement of Presence 3-4 4.1 Subjective Measurement 3-4 4.2 Objective Measurement 3-6 5.0 Determinants of Presence 3-6 5.1 Sensors and Displays 3-7 5.1.1 Coverage and Richness 3-7 5.1.2 Device Characteristics 3-7 RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II iii Page
Page 1: NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION
Page 6 and 7: 5.1.3 Obtrusiveness 3-7 5.1.4 Consi
Page 8 and 9: 3.0 Experience in SA 6-3 4.0 Digita
Page 10 and 11: HFM-121 / RTG-042 Members CHAIRMAN
Page 12 and 13: x RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II
Page 14 and 15: Environnements virtuels d’interac
Page 16 and 17: ES - 4 RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II
Page 18 and 19: INTRODUCTION The definition conside
Page 20 and 21: INTRODUCTION 1 - 4 RTO-TR-HFM-121-P
Page 22 and 23: PERCEPTUAL ISSUES OF AUGMENTED AND
Page 46 and 47: PRESENCE somewhat similar, commonly
Page 48 and 49: PRESENCE 4.0 MEASUREMENT OF PRESENC
Page 50 and 51: PRESENCE 4.2 Objective Measurement
Page 52 and 53: PRESENCE 5.1.4 Consistency Another
Page 54 and 55:
PRESENCE used in this context, whic
Page 56 and 57:
PRESENCE interact that determine pr
Page 58 and 59:
PRESENCE etc.” The willingness to
Page 60 and 61:
PRESENCE [11] Slater, M. (2002). Pr
Page 62 and 63:
A REVIEW OF THE MENTAL WORKLOAD LIT
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
SIMULATOR SICKNESS RESEARCH SUMMARY
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
DYNAMIC SITUATIONS: THE SOLDIER’S
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
TEAM AND COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE MEA
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
AFTER ACTION REVIEW IN SIMULATION-B
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 1.2 Pur
Page 160 and 161:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT • Mar
Page 162 and 163:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT technol
Page 164 and 165:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT • Net
Page 166 and 167:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT on the
Page 168 and 169:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT • The
Page 170 and 171:
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT massive
Page 172 and 173:
CONCLUSIONS scenario. This complex
Page 174 and 175:
CONCLUSIONS training systems. As in
Page 176 and 177:
RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II
Page 178:
NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION
show all

RTO-TR-HFM-121-Part-II - FTP Directory Listing - NATO

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?