28.01.2013 Views

What is History / by Edward Hallett Carr - Universal History Library

What is History / by Edward Hallett Carr - Universal History Library

What is History / by Edward Hallett Carr - Universal History Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHAT IS HISTORY<br />

present, and future are linked together in the endless chain of h<strong>is</strong>tory.<br />

The change in the modern world which cons<strong>is</strong>ted in the development of man's<br />

consciousness of himself may be said to begin with Descartes, who first establ<strong>is</strong>hed man's<br />

position as a being who can not only think, but think about h<strong>is</strong> own thinking, who can<br />

observe himself in the act of observing, so that man <strong>is</strong> simultaneously the subject and the<br />

object of thought and observation. But the development did not become fully explicit till<br />

the latter part of the eighteenth century, when Rousseau opened up new depths of human<br />

self-understanding and self-consciousness, and gave man a new outlook on the world of<br />

nature and on traditional civil<strong>is</strong>ation. The French revolution, said de Tocqueville, was<br />

inspired <strong>by</strong> 'the belief that what was wanted was to replace the complex of traditional<br />

customs governing the social order of the day <strong>by</strong> simple elementary rules deriving from<br />

the exerc<strong>is</strong>e of the human reason and from natural law'. 'Never till then,' wrote Acton in<br />

one of h<strong>is</strong> manuscript notes, 'had men sought liberty, knowing what they sought.'" For<br />

Acton, as for Hegel, liberty and reason were never far apart. And with the French<br />

revolution was linked the American revolution.<br />

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth upon th<strong>is</strong> continent a new nation,<br />

conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.<br />

It was, as Lincoln's words suggest, a unique event - the first occasion in h<strong>is</strong>tory when men<br />

deliberately and consciously formed themselves into a nation, and then consciously and<br />

deliberately set out to mould other men into it. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries<br />

man had already become fully conscious of the world around him and of its laws. They<br />

were no longer the mysterious decrees of an inscrutable providence, but laws accessible to<br />

reason. But they were laws to which man was subject, and not laws of h<strong>is</strong> own making: In<br />

the next stage man was to become fully conscious of h<strong>is</strong> power over h<strong>is</strong> environment and<br />

over himself, and of h<strong>is</strong> right to make the laws under which he would live.<br />

The transition from the eighteenth century to the modern world was long and gradual. Its<br />

representative philosophers were Hegel and Marx, both of whom occupy an ambivalent<br />

position. Hegel <strong>is</strong> rooted in the idea of laws of providence converted into laws of reason.<br />

Hegel's world spirit grasps providence firmly with one hand and reason with the other. He<br />

echoes Adam Smith. Individuals 'gratify their own interests; but something more <strong>is</strong><br />

there<strong>by</strong> accompl<strong>is</strong>hed, which <strong>is</strong> latent in their action though not present in their<br />

consciousness'. Of the rational purpose of the world spirit he writes that men 'in the very<br />

act of real<strong>is</strong>ing it, make it the occasion of sat<strong>is</strong>fying their desire, whose import <strong>is</strong> different<br />

file:///C|/Documents and Settings/Vidula/Local Settings/Temp/Rar$EX00.750/carr.htm (83 of 97)7/20/2006 11:28:45 AM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!