Attachment 1: Seattle's Parks and Recreation 2011 Development
Attachment 1: Seattle's Parks and Recreation 2011 Development
Attachment 1: Seattle's Parks and Recreation 2011 Development
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Kathleen Conner<br />
DPR RCO <strong>Development</strong> Plan <strong>2011</strong> RES ATT 1<br />
July 25, <strong>2011</strong><br />
Version #1<br />
Specifically for the <strong>2011</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Plan Update, two public meetings were held on<br />
March 16, <strong>2011</strong> at Jefferson Community Center (south Seattle) <strong>and</strong> March 23, <strong>2011</strong> at<br />
Bitter Lake Community Center (north Seattle). Meeting announcement flyers were<br />
distributed to all the Community Centers (26) <strong>and</strong> other parks buildings, community<br />
councils, district councils, blogs, <strong>and</strong> an e-mail list of over 3,000 names of individuals,<br />
community groups, <strong>and</strong> others. Press releases were sent to the media <strong>and</strong> blogs including<br />
the City of Seattle’s Ethnic Media Contact list. The meetings were also included in the<br />
City-wide calendar of meetings. “Twitter” <strong>and</strong> the Seattle <strong>Parks</strong> Facebook page were<br />
used to advertise <strong>and</strong> remind folks of the meetings. Despite the broad advertisement of<br />
these meetings, participation was limited to approximately 21 persons at the first meeting<br />
<strong>and</strong> 10 persons at the second meeting. Taking an informal poll at the meetings, staff<br />
learned that some of the participants heard about the meetings from the <strong>Parks</strong> Facebook<br />
page <strong>and</strong> blogs.<br />
At these public meetings, <strong>Parks</strong> used an interactive “dot” exercise in which each<br />
participant was asked to rank their three highest priorities for outdoor recreation with<br />
color coded dots. They were also asked to use other dots to indicate their preferences for<br />
additional facilities to meet recreation dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> for other things such as maintenance<br />
of the parks. The top three priorities <strong>and</strong> preferences for additional facilities were<br />
identified (see the Dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Need section of the Plan).<br />
Another tool that Seattle <strong>Parks</strong> used to prepare the <strong>Development</strong> Plan was a short survey,<br />
using Survey Monkey. Although it was primarily an on-line survey, hard copies were<br />
available in multiple locations. Ultimately, the on-line portion of it was the most<br />
successful. Approximately 480 persons took the survey which asked questions about<br />
park <strong>and</strong> recreation usage, priorities, how well the current facilities meet the needs of<br />
Seattle, <strong>and</strong> what Seattle should focus on with grant funding. Appendix C is a recap of<br />
responses to the surveys <strong>and</strong> meetings.<br />
A final component of <strong>Parks</strong>’ public involvement strategy was to make direct contact with<br />
groups that don’t often attend traditional meetings in Seattle. Using telephone <strong>and</strong> e-mail<br />
contact, <strong>Parks</strong> staff reached out to about 15 community organizations that provide<br />
services to immigrant, refugee, <strong>and</strong> non-English speaking groups. Many of these<br />
organizations got the word out about the planning process to their members. This<br />
resulted in more folks knowing about the process <strong>and</strong> giving these groups a direct contact<br />
in the <strong>Parks</strong> department. Staff is hopeful that many of these citizens will be involved as<br />
the process moves forward.<br />
In early June, the Board of Park Commissioners held a briefing <strong>and</strong> public hearing on the<br />
draft plan. The Board made a recommendation on the Plan to the Acting <strong>Parks</strong><br />
Superintendent in late June. These meetings were televised <strong>and</strong> the public was<br />
encouraged to send written testimony. The Mayor <strong>and</strong> City Council will review the plan<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Council will be asked to pass a resolution adopting the plan. That is likely to<br />
occur by September, <strong>2011</strong>.<br />
<strong>2011</strong> <strong>Development</strong> Plan<br />
12 ATT 1 to DPR RCO <strong>Development</strong> Plan <strong>2011</strong> RES