29.01.2013 Views

Research Article

Research Article

Research Article

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1786<br />

Table 2. Effects of bagging on sugar content in loquat fruit (mg g −1 )<br />

www.soci.org H-X Xu, J-W Chen, M Xie<br />

Cultivar Treatment Sucrose Glucose Fructose Sorbitol Total sugar<br />

Baiyu CK 2.43 ± 0.04 b 29.0 ± 1.47 b 42.1 ± 2.14 b 2.26 ± 0.09 a 75.8 ± 3.71 b<br />

OWPB 3.00 ± 0.04 a 36.7 ± 0.10 a 47.6 ± 0.40 a 2.59 ± 0.24 a 89.9 ± 0.53 a<br />

TGDPB 2.27 ± 0.10 c 25.4 ± 1.34 c 42.3 ± 2.42 b 1.77 ± 0.10 b 71.8 ± 3.90 b<br />

F-value 91.85 ∗∗∗ 76.17 ∗∗∗ 8.19 ∗ 19.77 ∗∗ 27.87 ∗∗∗<br />

LSD0.05 0.14 2.29 3.76 0.32 6.24<br />

Ninghaibai CK 1.59 ± 0.08b 39.7 ± 2.57a 51.7 ± 3.32a 3.42 ± 0.56a 96.4 ± 6.30a OWPB 2.26 ± 0.10a 40.8 ± 0.99a 52.8 ± 1.67a 2.40 ± 0.10b 98.2 ± 2.31a TGDPB 2.57 ± 0.34a 35.1 ± 1.52b 45.6 ± 0.82b 2.15 ± 0.19b 85.5 ± 2.01b F-value 17.03∗ 8.07∗ 9.27∗ 11.50∗∗ 8.70∗ LSD0.05 0.42 3.63 4.39 0.69 8.08<br />

Values are expressed as means ± SD of three replications. Means within the same cultivar followed by the same superscript letters are not significantly<br />

different at P = 0.05.<br />

∗ Significant at P = 0.05.<br />

∗∗ significant at P = 0.01.<br />

∗∗∗ significant at P = 0.001.<br />

CK, control (unbagged); OWPB, one-layered white paper bags; TGDPB, two-layered paper bags with a black inner layer and a grey outer layer.<br />

OWPB or TGDPB, although the titratable acid content increased<br />

significantly compared with Ninghaibai controls.<br />

Surface colour is an important marketable (consumer acceptance)<br />

quality attribute and is a measure of L ∗ , a ∗ , b ∗ and hab.<br />

Table 1 shows that bagging improved fruit surface lightness as<br />

L ∗ was higher in the bagged than in the control fruits of both<br />

Baiyu and Ninghaibai. Fruit treated with TGDPB had the highest<br />

lightness values. Reduced light is known to promote the degradation<br />

of existing chlorophyll and inhibits carotenoid synthesis in<br />

fruit peel, 26 and this resulted in unbagged fruits having a lower<br />

hab and a more red than yellow hue (i.e. were more orange in<br />

colour compared with bagged fruits). In addition, fruits treated<br />

with TGDPB had higher hab than did those treated with OWPB.<br />

The effects of bagging on sugar content<br />

Sugar content is considered to be an important quality characteristic<br />

of fresh fruit. However, bagging with different materials<br />

can exert different effects on the composition of soluble sugars.<br />

For example, Padmavathamma and Hulamani 23 found that total<br />

sugars varied significantly with bag colour, whereas Yang et al. 27<br />

observed that bagging tended to reduce sugar content slightly,<br />

although the sugar content was not significantly affected by bag<br />

type. Table 2 indicates that the effects of bagging type on sugar<br />

content varied between cultivars. OWPB treatment increased the<br />

sucrose, glucose, fructose and sorbitol content and significantly<br />

increased the content of total sugar in Baiyu fruit. However, OWPB<br />

treatment increased the sucrose content, did not affect the glucose,<br />

fructose and total sugar content but decreased the sorbitol<br />

content in Ninghaibai fruit. Total sugar contents in Baiyu and Ninghaibai<br />

after TGDPB treatment were reduced by 5.6% and 11.3%,<br />

respectively, as compared with the controls.<br />

The effects of bagging on antioxidant compounds<br />

and antioxidant capacity<br />

Numerous studies have shown that fruit and vegetables are<br />

sources of diverse nutrient and non-nutrient molecules, many of<br />

which have antioxidant properties. The present study determined<br />

the antioxidant capacities of loquat fruit and analysed fruit extracts<br />

for compounds (total phenolic, flavonoid, carotenoid and vitamin<br />

C) that might contribute to the antioxidant activity. Table 3 shows<br />

that the total phenolic and flavonoid contents decreased after<br />

bagging treatment. Following OWPB and TGDPB treatment, the<br />

total phenolic content of Baiyu fruit was reduced by 9.5% and<br />

45.6%, respectively, and that of Ninghaibai fruit was reduced by<br />

5.0% and 26%, respectively. This indicates that bagging influences<br />

the metabolism of phenolic compounds, of which the flavonoids<br />

are the dominant family. The pattern of variation in flavonoid<br />

content was similar to that observed for total phenolic, with<br />

maximum levels occurring in unbagged Baiyu (28.2 ± 4.4 µgg −1 )<br />

and Ninghaibai (51.0 ± 6.4 µgg −1 ) fruits. The flavonoid content<br />

was also lower in TGDPB-treated fruits than in OWPB-treated fruit.<br />

Carotenoids and vitamin C are also the antioxidant compounds<br />

in loquat. The study found that the carotenoid and vitamin C<br />

contents increased after bagging fruit with OWBP, but decreased<br />

in fruit bagged with TGDBP. Our other experiments have also<br />

observed that the carotenoid and vitamin C content varies<br />

significantly with bag type; however, both decreased markedly<br />

when light was excluded during the maturation of loquat as<br />

compared with that of control fruit (data not shown).<br />

Three independent methods, the DPPH, TEAC and FRAP assays,<br />

were used to compare the antioxidant capacity of fruit extracts.<br />

The results presented in Table 3 show that the antioxidant<br />

potential of loquat fruit extracts was significantly affected by<br />

light transmittance. The highest antioxidant potential in both of<br />

Baiyu and Ninghaibai loquat fruits was under full sunlight and<br />

lowest under bagging with TGDPB.<br />

Table 4 indicates that the total phenolic content and antioxidant<br />

capacity are well correlated (DPPH, r = 0.64; TEAC, r = 0.77;<br />

FRAP, r = 0.90). Fruits with the highest phenolic content<br />

(unbagged fruits of Baiyu and Ninghaibai) had the highest<br />

antioxidant potentials whereas fruit extracts characterised by<br />

low total phenolic levels exhibited a poor antioxidant capacity.<br />

Numerous studies have reported similar linear relationships<br />

between antioxidant activities and phenolic content. 28–30 A<br />

good correlation was also observed between total flavonoid and<br />

antioxidant capacity (DPPH, r = 0.84; TEAC, r = 0.87; FRAP, r =<br />

0.99) (Table 4). Flavonoids are low-molecular-weight polyphenolic<br />

compounds that are widely distributed in fruit and vegetables, 31<br />

and many have been shown to have antioxidant 32 and anticancer<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783–1788

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!