29.01.2013 Views

Research Article

Research Article

Research Article

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Review<br />

Received: 26 October 2009 Revised: 12 May 2010 Accepted: 17 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 16 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4041<br />

Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using<br />

a simple heritable genetic ground<br />

Josef Pribyl, a Vaclav Rehout, b Jindrich Citek b∗ and Jana Pribylova a<br />

Abstract<br />

The evaluation of an animal is based on production records, adjusted for environmental effects, which gives a reliable<br />

estimation of its breeding value. Highly reliable daughter yield deviations are used as inputs for genetic marker evaluation.<br />

Genetic variability is explained by particular loci and background polygenes, both of which are described by the genomic<br />

breeding value selection index. Automated genotyping enables the determination of many single-nucleotide polymorphisms<br />

(SNPs) and can increase the reliability of evaluation of young animals (from 0.30 if only the pedigree value is used to 0.60 when<br />

the genomic breeding value is applied). However, the introduction of SNPs requires a mixed model with a large number of<br />

regressors, in turn requiring new algorithms for the best linear unbiased prediction and BayesB. Here, we discuss a method that<br />

uses a genomic relationship matrix to estimate the genomic breeding value of animals directly, without regressors. A one-step<br />

procedure evaluates both genotyped and ungenotyped animals at the same time, and produces one common ranking of all<br />

animals in a whole population. An augmented pedigree–genomic relationship matrix and the removal of prerequisites produce<br />

more accurate evaluations of all connected animals.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: genomic breeding value; methods; QTL; SNP; linear model; genomic relationship<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Laboratory techniques and mathematical and statistical methods<br />

for the evaluation of animal breeding values (BV) are undergoing<br />

continuous improvement. Molecular genetic data can be analysed<br />

for associations with production traits. 1 However, the relationships<br />

between farm animal production traits and molecular-genetic<br />

information are often measured imprecisely. Many studies of the<br />

relationships between genetic markers and quantitative traits<br />

are methodologically flawed and do not reflect contemporary<br />

breeding practices; sometimes even the basic context of breeding<br />

and farming conditions are not taken into consideration. This<br />

type of research requires very careful experimental design that<br />

considers pedigree structure and generates an adequate quantity<br />

of data using sophisticated mathematical and statistical methods.<br />

The general objective of each evaluation is to explain the<br />

variability of the characteristics studied and determine why<br />

animals or groups of animals differ from one another. Farm<br />

animal productivity is simultaneously influenced by many genetic<br />

and non-genetic factors, and it is practically impossible to<br />

plan a completely balanced experiment. Therefore, sophisticated<br />

statistical procedures must be used.<br />

Recently, the evaluation of animal performance based on<br />

molecular-genetic information has become more widespread.<br />

Dairy cattle populations evaluated for several groups of traits<br />

of moderate and low heritability (production, conformation,<br />

reproduction) using genetic markers have been presented by<br />

several authors 2–8 as well as in Interbull Bulletin No. 39. 9 In pig<br />

and poultry populations, whole-genome scanning and genetic<br />

diversity analysis are quite extensive. 10,11 The methodologies used<br />

may be generalised across species, but several facts influence<br />

methodological advancements in relation to dairy cattle: the cost<br />

of genotyping is favourable relative to the price of each animal;<br />

advanced reproductive methods are routinely applied and the BV<br />

of sires is therefore highly reliable; there is a huge global market<br />

for sperm and breeding animals encompassing many companies<br />

and breeder associations; and worldwide workshops on animal<br />

evaluation are frequently organised through publications such as<br />

the Interbull Bulletin. 9<br />

The aim of this review is to provide a survey of the procedures<br />

used to evaluate animal production traits using simple heritable<br />

genetic markers. Some basic methodological approaches will be<br />

emphasised, particularly those that connect genomic breeding<br />

value (GEBV) to traditional methodologies.<br />

ANIMAL EVALUATION<br />

An overview of the standard procedures used worldwide in<br />

the genetic evaluation (BV prediction) of production traits in<br />

farm animals, as well as new developments, are continuously<br />

published by ICAR, Interbeef, Interbull, Interstallion and other<br />

international organisations. A number of countries cooperate<br />

in the international evaluation of dairy cattle, which invokes<br />

international inspection of the methods used to estimate BV in<br />

domesticcountry. 9 Here,specialattentionispaidtothecontinuous<br />

updating of national and international evaluation procedures.<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Jindrich Citek, Department of Genetics, Faculty of<br />

Agriculture, South Bohemia University, Studentska 13, CZ 370 05 České<br />

Budějovice, Czech Republic. E-mail: citek@zf.jcu.cz<br />

a Institute of Animal Science, CZ 104 01 Praha 10-Uhrineves, Czech Republic<br />

b Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, South Bohemia University,<br />

Studentska 13, CZ 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1765


1766<br />

Generally, mixed linear models of best linear unbiased prediction<br />

(BLUP) in an animal model (AM) are used, and a pedigree of three<br />

or more generations of ancestors is taken into account according<br />

to the model equation:<br />

Y = Xb + Zu + e (1)<br />

where Y is the vector of measured performances, X and Z are<br />

known matrices that relate performance to the systematic effects<br />

of the breeding environment and the animals, b and u are the<br />

estimated vectors of fixed systematic environmental effects and<br />

the random effects of an animal (BV) with the additive numerator<br />

relationship matrix (A), and e is the vector of random error.<br />

Using this model equation, a system of normal equations is<br />

constructed in which the unknown constants (b) and(u) are<br />

estimated. These systems of equations are vast, and special<br />

algorithms are required for their solution. 12<br />

Most of the variability in any measured production trait is<br />

caused by systematic environmental effects. The influence of<br />

the herd–year–season, or herd–test-day, which identifies a<br />

contemporary group of animals kept under the same conditions,<br />

is usually the most important factor.<br />

Evaluations are generally oriented to the MT-AM (multi-trait<br />

animal model), RR-TDAM (random regression test-day animal<br />

model), AM-maternal, and nonlinear methodologies for survival<br />

(kit) analysis. 13–23<br />

It is important to find a method of evaluation that minimises<br />

residual error and simultaneously considers all of the effects that<br />

may influence the performance variable being measured. From<br />

a genetic perspective, it is important to ask: What proportion<br />

of variability is explained by the statistical model used? Is this<br />

proportion different in a model that does not account for genetic<br />

effects? Is this model the best (optimal) of all the possibilities<br />

tested? The proportion of variability explained by the statistical<br />

model used (R 2 ) and other information criteria for testing the<br />

suitability of the model, such as Akaike’s information criterion<br />

(AIC), Bayes information criterion (BIC), Bayes factor (BF) and the<br />

likelihood ratio test (LRT), are very important in answering these<br />

questions. 24–28<br />

Molecular-genetic information can be used to improve selection<br />

programmes. 29 Animals are evaluated more accurately when their<br />

entire genetic value is partitioned into causal factors and withinfamily<br />

genetic components are exploited. The use of moleculargenetic<br />

markers in breeding is the inclusion of additional criteria in<br />

the selection indices. These markers increase selection differences<br />

relativetoexistingtraditionalbreedingprogrammesbydecreasing<br />

the correlation among sib individuals, increasing the accuracy of<br />

animal selection, allowing the utilisation of genetic variability<br />

that is usually included in non-utilisable residuum, and allowing<br />

a shortening of the generation interval (because they may be<br />

analysed in young animals). The use of selection markers is<br />

conditional upon the timely laboratory analysis of the entire<br />

subpopulation subjected to pre-selection (e.g., young bulls) and<br />

rapid application before the determined gene linkages change.<br />

This requires frequent updates of selection indices, as shown<br />

below (Eqn (2)). The consistent application of genomic selection<br />

markedly reduces the cost of a selection programme. 3,30<br />

However, data analysis becomes more complicated, the number<br />

of estimated parameters becomes higher, and a modified<br />

information criterion (mBIC) is necessary for the selection of a<br />

suitable model of evaluation. 31,32<br />

In order to select individuals for breeding, marker-assisted<br />

selection (MAS) may be applied if several genetic markers are to<br />

www.soci.org J Pribyl et al.<br />

be used. Alternatively, genomic selection utilises high numbers of<br />

markers that densely cover the whole genome. 3,33 BV is usually<br />

calculated in two steps. In the first step, the regression coefficients<br />

(v) (substitution effects of the alleles of a considered locus) are<br />

determined in a reference population with known performance<br />

and highly reliable BVs. This reference population usually includes<br />

only a part of the population under selection. From the first step,<br />

quantitative trait loci (QTL) effects are estimated. Subsequently,<br />

BV is determined for all of the young animals in the evaluated<br />

(sub)population by means of a selection index, as described in<br />

Eqn (2). 30<br />

The reference population and the evaluated population are<br />

separated by at least one generation. Therefore, the relationships<br />

between markers and QTLs determined in the older generation<br />

may not be fully applicable to the younger evaluated population,<br />

as the QTLs are not fully covered by study markers. Furthermore,<br />

the influences of selection, mutation, immigration of sires used<br />

intensively in artificial insemination, changes in environment, and<br />

the development of the commercial population under selection<br />

can also affect the applicability of QTL data across generations.<br />

Therefore, it is necessary to periodically redetermine u in Eqn (1),<br />

allele frequencies (q) in Eqn (5), their inherence in the genotypes<br />

of individual animals (T), and regression coefficients (v) in(3)so<br />

that the gap between the reference and the evaluated population<br />

will be as small as possible. 3,30,34<br />

The GEBV of a given trait is calculated based on known loci and<br />

remaining polygenes according to the selection index:<br />

GEBVj = k1 DGVj + k2u ∗ j<br />

where GEBVj is the genomic (total) BV for an individual (j)<br />

determined based on the genomic information at the locus (i)<br />

and remaining polygenic effect. DGVj is the direct genetic value,<br />

calculated as the sum of BVs for a particular loci:<br />

DGVj = �jTijvij<br />

where Tij (with regard to Eqn (9)) is the ith element in the jth row<br />

of the known incidence matrix correlating the genetic effects of<br />

particular alleles to the observed individual, vij is the vector of<br />

genetic marker effects, u ∗ j represents the BV calculated based on<br />

the remaining polygenes, and k1 and k2 are the weights of the<br />

information sources in the index. 35<br />

If the GEBV is calculated for young animals without their own<br />

production records, u ∗ j represents only information about their<br />

parents. In cases where a high density of genetic markers is<br />

available, the u ∗ j in Eqn (2) is frequently omitted.<br />

GENETICALLY CONDITIONED VARIABILITY<br />

OF PERFORMANCE<br />

Reliably determined population-genetic parameters are a precondition<br />

for genetic evaluation. We are usually interested in<br />

phenotype variability (σ 2 P), which can be separated into genetic<br />

additive (σ 2 A), genetic dominant (σ 2 D), genetic epistatic (σ 2 I), and<br />

unpredictable residual (σ 2 E) components, plus covariance caused<br />

by genotype/environment interaction (2σGE). 36 It is generally assumed<br />

that the genotype/environment interaction is negligible.<br />

Therefore:<br />

σ 2 P = σ 2 G + σ 2 E = σ 2 A + σ 2 D + σ 2 I + σ 2 E<br />

The additive effects that are accumulated over successive<br />

generations of selection are used in breeding. Nevertheless, other<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773<br />

(2)<br />

(3)<br />

(4)


Evaluation of animals by simple heritable markers www.soci.org<br />

genetic effects are also reflected in performance, and if they are<br />

omitted the results of the evaluation may be distorted.<br />

One locus<br />

Some genes may have a direct impact on quantitative production<br />

traits, and therefore efforts are made to utilise them directly in<br />

breeding. These candidate genes (or quantitative trait loci (QTL), if<br />

describing markers) explain a portion of the genetic variability in<br />

the trait being considered.<br />

At two alleles in a locus, the portion of the additive genetic<br />

variance conditioned by one gene (i) can be approximated by a<br />

binomial distribution: 36<br />

σ 2 Ai = 2qi(1 − qi)vi 2<br />

where qi is the frequency of the studied allele at locus i and vi is<br />

the additive substitution effect of alleles at locus i.<br />

The portion of the variance caused by a dominant allele at a<br />

given locus is<br />

σ 2 Di = (2qi(1 − qi)di) 2<br />

(6)<br />

where di is the dominance effect in locus i. Often, it is assumed<br />

that di = 0.<br />

In the case of genes with major effects on the trait being<br />

studied, the analysis is slightly easier because animals carrying a<br />

desirable allele frequently exceed the normal variable range for the<br />

measured production trait. This is obvious from the distribution<br />

function of the estimated BV of the evaluated trait (additional<br />

peaks, outliers), which indicates that a special genetic effect is<br />

occurring and should be included as a separate factor in the<br />

model. 37<br />

Several loci<br />

Correlations may exist between the genes in question. Therefore,<br />

thevariabilityofanobservedtraitthatisexplainedbyseveralgenes<br />

depends on the variability caused by each gene and combinations<br />

thereof (λ). 38 The additive covariance between two loci can be<br />

expressed as<br />

(5)<br />

cov(Ai,A i ′) = (1 − 2λ) 2 (σAiσ Ai ′) (7)<br />

The theory of selection indices is used to determine the shares of<br />

several loci in the total genotype. 39,40<br />

Genes interact with one another, and any gene may have<br />

pleiotropic effects. These interactions are mostly unknown and<br />

may be quite extensive. This implies genetic epistatic variability<br />

(σ 2 I) based on two or more interactions among all loci studied.<br />

Itisexpectedthatmulti-generational,similarlyorientedongoing<br />

selection in commercial breeds will lead to the stabilisation of<br />

favourable genetic combinations. The fixation of desirable alleles<br />

couldalsooccuratanumberoflociinanimprovedbreed.However,<br />

breeding conditions change constantly, and combinations of<br />

genes are disturbed by selection, mutation and by the immigration<br />

of sires from other populations. Therefore, inter-gene interactions<br />

within some families may be expressed differently for a certain<br />

period before the gene linkages are again stabilised. This can be<br />

exploited in selection.<br />

When studying the influence of a selected gene on performance,<br />

the effects of nearby (linked) genes will also be included; thus the<br />

result does not correspond only to the studied gene or to the<br />

studied marker–QTL relationship. Therefore, when a low number<br />

of sparsely located markers is analysed, the effects of any given<br />

marker are frequently overestimated. 33 The effects calculated for<br />

each genetic parameter strongly depend on the number and<br />

density of genetic parameters included in a simultaneous analysis.<br />

One locus can also have an epistatic effect on several traits, which<br />

may be either positively or negatively correlated. It is therefore<br />

necessary to distinguish between pleiotropic and closely linked<br />

QTL effects. 41<br />

Polygenic effects: the ‘infinitesimal model’ (pol)<br />

A large number of unknown genes are assumed to affect the<br />

majority of production traits, and their overall influence on<br />

performance and its variability is the object of interest. In general,<br />

the components of variance are currently determined as in Eqn (1),<br />

by REML methods or by applying the Bayesian approach using<br />

the Gibbs sampling method. 12 These methods require the analysis<br />

and adjustment of input datasets so that specific components of<br />

variance (for example, within families, between families, caused<br />

by different effects of genes) can be estimated. 19,21<br />

Joint effects of particular loci with remaining polygenes<br />

The overall influence of genetic effects on the observed production<br />

trait is expressed by the coefficient of heritability (h 2 = σ 2 A/σ 2 P).<br />

The specific roles of the genes which exert these effects generally<br />

remain unknown.<br />

The total additive genetic variability is the sum of the known<br />

loci according to Eqn (5), adjusted for mutual linkages (7) and<br />

‘residual’ additive genetic variability caused by the remaining<br />

polygene σ 2 Apol:<br />

σ 2 A = �jσ 2 Ai + �j�j; cov(Ai, A i ′) + σ 2 Apol<br />

Hence both single-locus effects and the remaining polygenic<br />

effects of the ‘genetic background’ should be considered<br />

simultaneously. 7,42–45<br />

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN FOR THE EVALUATION<br />

OF GENETIC MARKERS<br />

The objective is to estimate the genetic contribution to specific<br />

productiontraits.However,theexperimentaldesignshouldensure<br />

the reliable estimation of all factors that influence performance.<br />

The power of the evaluation of data depends on the structure<br />

and the size of the experiment, and the minimum number of<br />

observations required to achieve adequate predictive power can<br />

be calculated. 46 Large datasets spanning progeny from many sires<br />

are usually necessary. 2,3,30,43 Generally, thousands of animals are<br />

included in any one experiment.<br />

Laboratory analyses are expensive, and therefore the decision<br />

of which animals from which generation should be genotyped<br />

should be made carefully, to achieve the highest possible reliability<br />

with the lowest possible cost. Several methods based on the<br />

relationship matrices between animals have been developed for<br />

this purpose. 49<br />

Both the screening of allele frequencies and the evaluation of<br />

their relationship to production traits require a pedigree analysis.<br />

Sires,especiallythoseimportedfromotherpopulationsforartificial<br />

insemination, can dramatically change the frequencies of alleles<br />

in a herd or an entire population in a short period of time.<br />

There are differences in the methodologies used to evaluate<br />

F1/F2 generation-designed experiments in which extremely<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

(8)<br />

1767


1768<br />

different breeds are crossed 38,50 and studies involving stably<br />

selected commercial populations, where alleles are expected to<br />

be in favourable interactions. The second case, which is connected<br />

with the continuous improvement of already productive breeds,<br />

is generally of greater interest to breeders.<br />

DD + GDD<br />

Sib animals, belonging to the same families, generally have similar<br />

performance capabilities. They share both the observed genes<br />

and background polygenes. It is crucial to determine whether<br />

performance is influenced by the studied locus or by other<br />

polygenes.<br />

Study designs that incorporate data from multiple generations<br />

have been developed for the analysis of small numbers of markers.<br />

These daughter design (DD) and granddaughter design (GDD)<br />

analyses allow estimation of the effects of the studied loci within<br />

families, i.e., within groups of sib animals with a similar genetic<br />

background. 38,51 In this type of analysis, the initial generations of<br />

sires (i.e., parents or grandparents) must be heterozygous at the<br />

studied locus. In this way, each initial animal gives rise to two<br />

genetically different groups of progeny with respect to the alleles<br />

studied.<br />

In the proposed GDD experiment, only generations of ancestors<br />

without their own performance measurements can be genotyped.<br />

Their performance scores are assigned by means of progeny<br />

testing from a large set of non-genotyped progeny. This<br />

considerably decreases the number of individuals that must be<br />

genotyped despite achieving a high reliability of evaluation. The<br />

total number of animals required for the experiment is relative<br />

to the proportion of genetic variability influenced by the locus,<br />

allele frequencies, and the level of recombination between QTL<br />

and the marker. However, only the additive effects of genes can<br />

be estimated in this design. The GDD and general pedigree design<br />

analysis of QTL in dairy cattle have been compared in simulation<br />

studies. 52<br />

Design with a large number of markers (SNP)<br />

An increased number of markers introduces more complexity. The<br />

size of the reference population of sires with highly reliable BV<br />

estimates is particularly important. 2,3,43 Larger numbers are better,<br />

and several thousands of sires are desirable.<br />

A MODEL FOR ESTIMATING GENETIC EFFECTS<br />

The principle of evaluation consists in the separation of the<br />

effects of purely heritable loci from the effects of other genetic<br />

background. 43,47,48,53 The BLUP method and similar approaches<br />

are the best procedures that can be used to adjust measured<br />

BVvalues.ConsistentwithEqns(1)and(2),theevaluationcanbe<br />

formally expressed by a modified mixed linear model:<br />

Y = Xb + Z[u ∗ + Tv] + e (9)<br />

where T is the known matrix of the experiment design that links<br />

an animal to the genetic effects of particular alleles. Each row<br />

may include columns according to particular loci and several<br />

genetic effects of each locus with values for additive effects<br />

(tAi¤ ), dominance effects (tDi¤ ), twolocus<br />

epistatic interactions between loci (t Iii ′ = tAit Ai ′); 32 u ∗ is the<br />

estimated vector of the random ‘residual’ polygenic effects for<br />

each animal (i.e., the partial BV after the effects of the studied loci<br />

www.soci.org J Pribyl et al.<br />

are excluded) with the additive relationship matrix; and v is the<br />

estimated vector of the effects of genetic markers. This may also<br />

comprise several loci and encompass additive, dominance and<br />

epistatic effects.<br />

Genetic markers (v) can be considered to have fixed 32,53 or<br />

random effects. In the latter case, either the diagonal genetic<br />

matrix alone, Iσ 2 Ai, is considered 54 for each random effect (i), or<br />

the complete covariance structure and its relationship with the<br />

identity by descent matrix (IBD), IBDσ 2 Ai, is taken into account.<br />

IBD describes the probable positional relationships between each<br />

marker/QTL pair and the probability of inheriting the paternal<br />

or maternal QTL allele. The construction of IBD depends on<br />

whether linkage analysis (LA), linkage disequilibrium (LD) or a<br />

combination of both methods (LDLA) was used to determine<br />

linkage status. 8 In this context, several teams have developed<br />

algorithms for the construction of an IBD matrix. 41,44,55 They have<br />

also derived genotype values for non-genotyped sib animals<br />

whose performance data may be then used to identify candidate<br />

genes.<br />

DATA FOR EVALUATION<br />

Several types of data describing performance can be used for<br />

these evaluations. Either direct performance records or adjusted<br />

values may be used. For the second approach, data are adjusted<br />

for non-genetic noise as precisely as possible, when BV with high<br />

reliability is estimated in large populations. This yields adjusted<br />

(pseudo) values for BV, yield deviation (YD) or daughter yield<br />

deviation (DYD) that may be used in further analyses.<br />

Direct individual performance<br />

If genetic parameters (markers) are determined directly in animals<br />

from their performance records, the evaluated trait (Y) according<br />

to Eqn (9) is their recorded performance.<br />

Given the pedigree structure and design of the experiment, it<br />

is possible to estimate additive, dominance and epistatic genetic<br />

effects, all of which could be included in v. However, in practice<br />

relatively few performance values are known for each animal.<br />

Therefore the values of vectors u ∗ , v and other effects b in<br />

Eqn (9) can be estimated only with considerable error. 56,57<br />

Breeding value<br />

Animals with highly reliable BV are used for evaluation (usually<br />

sires whose value has been proven by progeny testing). In BV<br />

analysis, the effects of selected loci on major traits associated with<br />

milk performance are determined58–60 according to the following<br />

model:<br />

û = Tv + u ∗<br />

(10)<br />

where û is the vector of BV determined by a routine method<br />

BLUP-AM according to Eqn (1) based on all polygenes.<br />

The BV of an animal summarises the data on performance<br />

deviations of the contemporaries of all sib animals. The expected<br />

BV of the progeny (uO) is related to the BV of sires (uS) and mothers<br />

(uM) and to the random Mendelian sampling of parental gametes<br />

(MS).<br />

uO = 0.5[uS + uM] + MS (11)<br />

One half of the additive genetic variability of (uO) iscausedby<br />

MS. Therefore the result of Eqn (10) significantly depends on the<br />

volume and sources of information that contributed to the BV. A<br />

reliable input BV, which can be achieved only for animals with a<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773


Evaluation of animals by simple heritable markers www.soci.org<br />

large set of progeny, is a condition for a correct evaluation. This,<br />

however, implies that it is possible to evaluate only the additive<br />

genetic component.<br />

We must take into account the fact that BV represents a<br />

random effect (regressed value) and its value directly depends<br />

on the reliability of estimation (r2 ). The variability of BV (σ 2 u)is<br />

therefore higher at higher reliabilities, as shown by the following<br />

relationship:<br />

r 2 = σ 2 u/σ 2 A<br />

(12)<br />

This demonstrates that for BV estimates with low, unbalanced<br />

reliabilities the animal rank may change and the results of markers<br />

analysis are not very reliable.<br />

Daughter yield deviations<br />

DYD computed from Eqn (1) are used in most routine evaluations<br />

of markers. 45 Initially, yield deviations (YD) adjusted for all<br />

non-genetic effects are determined according to the following<br />

equation: 61<br />

YD = Y − Xb (13)<br />

where YD is the vector of yield deviations. The average deviations<br />

of sires’ daughters (DYD) is then determined and adjusted for 0.5<br />

BV of their mothers:<br />

DYD = Z ′ S [YD − 0.5Z ′ MuM]N −1<br />

(14)<br />

where ZS is the known matrix that relates daughter performance to<br />

the sire; ZM is the known matrix that relates daughter performance<br />

to the mother; uM is the vector of mothers’ BV; and N is the diagonal<br />

matrix that describes the number of daughters per sire.<br />

The values of DYD are independent of the reliability of sires BV<br />

estimates, and therefore are more comparable between sires with<br />

different reliabilities of BV estimation. In agreement with Eqn (11),<br />

DYD comprise 0.5 BV of a sire, including MS and random error. The<br />

alternative of DYD is de-regressed BV. 3<br />

Performances adjusted in this way are evaluated by weighted<br />

analysis according to (9), where the vector Y is substituted by the<br />

vector DYD, and vector b may encompass additional fixed effects.<br />

DYD values are the means for n daughters of sires. Taking<br />

into account the number of contemporaries connected to each<br />

daughter in DYD, and the structure of the entire dataset, we<br />

can generate the effective daughter contribution (EDC), which is<br />

determined based on the reliabilities of the estimation of sires’ BVs<br />

(r 2 ):<br />

EDC = (r 2 /(1 − r 2 ))((4 − h 2 )/h 2 ) (15)<br />

The weight (w) for weighted analysis, which is the inverse of DYD<br />

variance, corresponds to the value of EDC. The exact derivation<br />

of the weight factor for special situations has been described<br />

previously. 61,62<br />

DYD has been used in several GDD studies; one evaluated 39<br />

markers in a set of 4993 sires and another evaluated 263 markers<br />

in a set of 872 sires. 7,63<br />

As in the evaluation of BV, only the additive genetic component<br />

can be determined by DYD. If the number of progeny per sire is<br />

large then they prevail in his BV, r 2 is high and balanced, and the<br />

sire’s MS is almost completely contained both in BV and in DYD.<br />

The correlation between BV and DYD is in this case high, and the<br />

results of evaluation for genetic markers on the basis of BV and<br />

DYD are similar. 32<br />

METHODS FOR EVALUATING GENETIC<br />

MARKERS<br />

When only a small number of genes is studied, it is not<br />

possible to evaluate the experiment correctly without splitting<br />

the genotype influence into the part played by singular observed<br />

genes and the part played by the other (residual) polygenic<br />

‘genetic background’. 7,33,64,65 On the other hand, single observed<br />

genes also contribute to the additive effects of all genes, and<br />

the polygenic effect (u) is the sum of these additive effects.<br />

Therefore, it is not easy to distinguish between the influence of<br />

the polygenic ‘genetic background’ and the effects of individual<br />

genes; in these cases the effect of the individual observed genes<br />

is frequently reduced. 66 Therefore careful experimental design,<br />

particularly with respect to the size of the experiment, is necessary<br />

to estimate the effects of genetic markers.<br />

Several connected questions must be asked in any evaluation of<br />

genetic markers: (A) What proportion of the genetic variability of<br />

the evaluated trait is explained by the studied genetic factors?<br />

(B) What is the genetic correlation between the influence of<br />

the factors studied and the influence of the ‘remaining’ genetic<br />

background on the evaluated trait? (C) Do the results from a model<br />

that considers only polygenic effects and a model that includes<br />

both QTL and remaining polygenic effects differ from each other?<br />

(D) What is the influence of each allele? (Note that it does not<br />

make sense to answer (D) without first answering (A).) (E) Do the<br />

studied genetic factors have similar effects in all groups of related<br />

animals?<br />

AsmallnumberofQTLs<br />

When a small number of loci are evaluated, QTLs are often used<br />

to represent fixed effects of the genotype in a linear model,<br />

for example in GLM/SAS. 67–69 The evaluation model also reflects<br />

systematic effects of the breeding environment or of groups of<br />

animals according to their relationships. With this method, it is<br />

not possible to wholly avoid the influence of correlated loci, and<br />

the effects of individual loci are therefore usually significantly<br />

overestimated. 33 The model can be improved by including a<br />

parameter for the random effects of the parents of genotyped<br />

animals. 56,57<br />

The effect of the studied locus depends on the genetic background<br />

of the animal and could differ between populations. 43,65<br />

The BLUP, REML and Bayesian analysis methods incorporate common<br />

fixed effects for particular loci and ‘residual’ random effects of<br />

remaining polygenes to provide more exact results. 7,43,45 Another<br />

approach for obtaining more exact results is also to use particular<br />

loci as random effects with IBD to account for their variability. 8,55<br />

A large number of SNPs<br />

Production traits depend on a large number of mutually linked,<br />

interacting genes that may be distributed across the entire<br />

genome. Currently, it is possible to sequence tens to hundreds of<br />

thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for many<br />

individual animals, densely covering the entire genome. A multiple<br />

regression analysis of all SNP markers describes their relationships<br />

to the production trait in question. Thus this analysis can be used<br />

to find the DGV and GEBV according to Eqns (3) and (2). Because<br />

a large number of SNPs is considered, there is less emphasis on<br />

the quantitative relationships between individual markers and the<br />

relevant QTL; instead, the overall relationship to the production<br />

trait in question is important.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1769


1770<br />

The high density of markers also allows the generalisation of<br />

effects. Relationships no longer need to be calculated individually<br />

within particular families and the effects of alleles are assumed to<br />

be consistent across all families for simplification. 33<br />

While the breeding values of young dairy cattle can be predicted<br />

with a reliability of about 30% by pedigree value on the basis of<br />

polygenes, an increase in reliability (to 50–70%) can be expected<br />

when large number of SNPs are evaluated. 2,3,33<br />

Computational strategies used to evaluate SNP data<br />

Generally, techniques based on the BLUP and BayesB methods<br />

are used to evaluate large numbers of SNPs. 33 Depending on<br />

the total number of SNPs sequenced, it is usually necessary to<br />

calculate many genetic regression relationships between a given<br />

production trait and the studied alleles. 54,70 These relationships<br />

may be formally solved according to Eqn (9). Compared to a<br />

general AM calculated on the basis of polygenes only, the size<br />

of the vector DYD is relatively smaller (thousands of sires) but<br />

thesizeofthevectorv is large (tens of thousands of regression<br />

coefficients). When there is a high density of SNPs across the<br />

entire genome, the term u ∗ is often omitted from the solution<br />

and only SNPs are used (vector v). 43 In practice, however, it is<br />

expected that even when a high density of markers is obtained<br />

some QTLs will not be covered and the polygene effect is therefore<br />

still considered. 3 Only additive effects are evaluated due to the<br />

large number of SNPs; the inclusion of non-additive effects would<br />

increase the number of effects in the model enormously. After<br />

simplification, the computation model can be expressed as<br />

DYD = Xb + Tv + e (16)<br />

where Xb describes the total mean and fixed effects included in<br />

this step.<br />

Often, the majority of SNPs do not have any information content.<br />

If the relationships between the markers and QTLs are already<br />

known, it is possible to reduce the number of regressors in the<br />

model, which will simplify the solution and also reduce the cost of<br />

laboratory analyses. 71<br />

Because of the large number of independent variables, these<br />

systems of equations (16) are poorly conditioned and cannot<br />

always be solved. Therefore, the systems of equations and<br />

algorithms of solutions must be rearranged. For example, ridge<br />

regression may be applied, which means that SNPs are treated as<br />

random effects. At the same time, numerical values are added to<br />

the diagonal of the matrix of the system to ensure the solubility of<br />

the equations. 34 The added values are the inverse of the genetic<br />

variabilities of each SNP. These values are not usually known for<br />

many genetic parameters, so other simplifications must be used<br />

when constant components of variance are required for all SNPs. 33<br />

The sum of components across all loci yields the total additivegenetic<br />

variability of the studied trait σ 2 A.MatrixT in Eqn (16)<br />

has f rows corresponding to the number of evaluated sires with<br />

known daughter performance. If only additive gene effects are<br />

considered, matrix T has m columns corresponding to the number<br />

of SNP markers considered (m > f). Therefore, a system of the<br />

matrix size m × m at least is solved, and tens of thousands of<br />

regression coefficients are estimated. 54<br />

DIRECT ESTIMATION OF GEBV<br />

Based on T, a genomic relationships matrix (G) can be<br />

determined. 72,73 This requires the introduction of the matrix Q,<br />

www.soci.org J Pribyl et al.<br />

which describes deviations of allelic frequencies in the basic ‘nonselected’<br />

population. The ith column of Q contains the deviation<br />

of the frequency of the second allele in locus i from the expected<br />

value (0.5) multiplied by two Qi = 2(qi − 0.5). 72 The dimensions<br />

of matrix Q correspond to those of matrix T.ThematrixGhas the<br />

form<br />

G = ([T − Q][T − Q] ′ )/(2�qi(1 − qi)) (17)<br />

which is analogous to the generally used numerator relationship<br />

matrix (A) in Eqns (1) and (9). Its dimensions are f × f, where<br />

the diagonal indicates the number of homozygous loci in the<br />

evaluated animal and the elements off the diagonal indicate the<br />

numbers of alleles shared by sib animals.<br />

The diagonal residual covariance matrix Rσ 2 E of dimensions<br />

f × f is then constructed. This matrix corresponds to the residual<br />

effect (e) in Eqn (16). Relative to Eqn (15), the elements on diagonal<br />

R are connected with the reliabilities of BV estimates for particular<br />

sires, but only on the basis of their progeny from which DYD were<br />

computed (excluding other sources of information):<br />

Rjj = (1 − r 2 jP)/r 2 jP<br />

(18)<br />

where r 2 jP is the partial reliability of the sire’s BV based on his<br />

progeny.<br />

Based on the theory of selection indices, it is then possible<br />

to determine the direct genetic value of sires with known<br />

daughter performance (DGVS) 72 by adapting 2DYD for the vector<br />

of observations: 42<br />

DGVS = G[G + Rk] −1 2DYD (19)<br />

where k = σ 2 E/σ 2 A.<br />

The genomic covariance matrix between proven sires (S) and<br />

young unevaluated animals (O) is<br />

C = ([TO − QO][TS − QS] ′ )/(2�qi(1 − qi)) (20)<br />

where TO and TS are the known matrices assigning particular loci<br />

to the young animals and proven sires and QO and QS are Q<br />

matrices that have been modified according to the number of<br />

young animals and proven sires included.<br />

The predicted direct genetic value for young animals (DGVO)isa<br />

genomic regression based on proven animals with already known<br />

BV:<br />

DGVO = CG −1 DGVS<br />

(21)<br />

The solution by means of the selection index according to<br />

Eqns (17)–(21) is identical to the preceding solutions in Eqns (16)<br />

and(3) butthedimensionsofthematricesaresubstantiallysmaller,<br />

corresponding to the numbers of genotyped animals (f). 72,73 The<br />

estimation of genetic regression coefficients according to the<br />

particular loci (v) may also be omitted. Hence the solution is<br />

simplified and does not require iterative methods. 72 Therefore,<br />

a direct determination of DGV estimate reliability is feasible. For<br />

sires with known daughter performance (S), reliability estimates<br />

correspond to the diagonal elements of the term:<br />

G[G + Rk] −1 G (22)<br />

For young animals without known performance (O), reliability<br />

estimates correspond to the diagonal elements of the term<br />

C[G + Rk] −1 C ′<br />

(23)<br />

A similar solution can also be obtained by the weighted analysis<br />

of a linear model as in Eqn (1) with DYD substituted for input data<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773


Evaluation of animals by simple heritable markers www.soci.org<br />

and weighted according to Eqn (18). In this case, A is substituted<br />

by G and Xb covers only the general mean. 72,73<br />

A one-step approach<br />

The process of evaluation described above has several disadvantages,<br />

namely that it is influenced by the input parameters used<br />

in a multi-step procedure. Inaccuracies in these parameters may<br />

bias the evaluation. It is also difficult to compare genotyped and<br />

ungenotyped animals evaluated by different procedures. This may<br />

be overcome by incorporating all parts of the evaluation into a<br />

one-step procedure.<br />

From Eqn (19), it follows that molecular-genetic information<br />

is collected in G. The additive numerator relationship matrix<br />

(A) is probability based and deviates from expected values<br />

due to random Mendelian sampling. 74 The realised genomic<br />

relationship matrix (G) should therefore be more precise and<br />

lead to more precise selection. 73 A single-step evaluation using<br />

original measured performances (Y) as input has been proposed,<br />

in which the pedigree-based numerator relationship matrix (A)<br />

covering all evaluated animals is augmented by a contribution<br />

from (G) with genotyped animals. 75<br />

AmatrixHhas been derived, which is substituted for the<br />

usual matrix (A) in Eqn (1). 76 Further, a computational procedure<br />

has been developed for the solution of animal models directly<br />

from the accumulated measured data of all genotyped and<br />

non-genotyped animals in large commercial populations. 6,75 The<br />

essential component of the system of equations constructed<br />

according to Eqn (1) is the inverse of the relationship matrix, in<br />

this case:<br />

H −1 = A −1 �<br />

0 0<br />

+<br />

0 λ(G−1 − A −1<br />

22 )<br />

�<br />

(24)<br />

where H is the pedigree–genomic relationship matrix, λ is a scaling<br />

factor and A22 is a block of A that corresponds to the genotyped<br />

animals.<br />

This one-step procedure eliminates several assumptions that<br />

must be made for multi-step procedures. It is less biased and allows<br />

the evaluation of large commercial populations even when only<br />

some individuals in the population are genotyped. This improves<br />

evaluationaccuracybothforgenotypedandungenotypedanimals<br />

and generates a single common rank for all animals. This model<br />

further enables the use of multi-trait AM and models with different<br />

complexities, which are now common in animal evaluations. 6<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The majority of traits are conditioned in a complex way; it can<br />

be assumed that a production trait will only rarely be genetically<br />

conditioned in a simple way by a small number of independent<br />

genes. In practice, a large number of markers and a large number<br />

of animals with accurate performance estimates are necessary for<br />

the reliable evaluation of animals. 2,3<br />

Simplifications are often used in evaluations, but at the cost<br />

of lower reliability of results. A description of the variability<br />

of the evaluated data and the validity of the model are<br />

therefore necessary. Considerable attention should be paid to<br />

the development of ‘traditional’ methods of BV estimation on<br />

the basis of polygenes, which enables the correct adjustment of<br />

performance for environmental effects.<br />

Typically, a two-step evaluation of genotyped animals is<br />

performed. The first step is the estimation of ‘traditional’ BV<br />

for recorded traits according to BLUP-AM or a similar method.<br />

Based on these results, DYD are computed for particular sires with<br />

a highly reliable BV. In the second step, GEBV is determined for<br />

young animals without performance records.<br />

Marker-assisted selection is gradually being replaced by<br />

genomic selection, in which a huge number of genetic markers<br />

(SNPs) that densely cover the entire genome are analysed. In<br />

this case, polygenic effects can be eliminated from the solution<br />

without strongly affecting the results.<br />

Molecular-genetic information can be gathered in the genomic<br />

relationship matrix G in order to estimate DGV and GEBV with<br />

computationally simpler procedures.<br />

A one-step procedure that combines the animal model with a<br />

pedigree–genomic relationship matrix can be used to evaluate all<br />

animals in a population. This protocol is useful as it produces more<br />

accurate evaluations than do other methods and also generates a<br />

common rank for all genotyped and ungenotyped animals in the<br />

population.<br />

The methods described here have significant practical importance<br />

in animal breeding.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This work was supported bythe Ministryof Agriculture of the Czech<br />

Republic (MZe 0002701404) and by the Ministry of Education of<br />

theCzechRepublic(MSM6007665806).Wegratefullyacknowledge<br />

the helpful comments of anonymous reviewers.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Czarnik U, Galinski M, Pareek ChS, Zabolewicz T and Wielgosz-Groth Z,<br />

Study of an association between SNP 775C>T within the bovine<br />

ITBG2 gene and milk performance traits in Black and White cows.<br />

Czech J Anim Sci 52:1–6 (2007).<br />

2 VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS,<br />

Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, et al, Invited review: Reliability of genomic<br />

predictions for North American Holstein bulls. JDairySci92:16–24<br />

(2009).<br />

3 Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ and Goddard ME, Invited<br />

review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.<br />

JDairySci92:433–443 (2009).<br />

4 Seefried F, Liu Z, Thaller G and Reinhadt F, Genomic breeding value of<br />

German Holstein. Zuchtungskunde 82:14–21 (2010).<br />

5 Guillaume F, Fritz S, Boichard D and Druet T, Short communication:<br />

Correlations of marker-assisted breeding values with progeny test<br />

breeding values for eight hundred ninety-nine French Holstein<br />

bulls. JDairySci91:2520–2522 (2008).<br />

6 Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D, Legarra A, Tsuruta S and Lawlor TJ, Hot<br />

topic: An unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and<br />

genomic information for a genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.<br />

JDairySci93:743–752 (2010).<br />

7 Ben Jemaa S, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Druet T, Denis C, Eggen A, et al,<br />

Detection of quantitative trait loci affecting non-return rate in<br />

French dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 125:280–288 (2008).<br />

8 Holmberg M, Sahana G and Andersson-Eklund L, Fine mapping of a<br />

quantitative trait locus on chromosome 9 affecting non-return rate<br />

in Swedish dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 124:257–263 (2007).<br />

9 Interbull, [Online]. Available: http://www.interbull.org [21 October<br />

2009].<br />

10 Amaral AJ, Megens HJ, Kerstens HHD, Heuven HCM, Dibbits B,<br />

Crooijmans RPMA, et al, Application of massive parallel sequencing<br />

to whole genome SNP discovery in the porcine genome. BMC<br />

Genomics 10:374 (2009).<br />

11 MuirWM, WongGK, ZhangY, WangJ, GroenenMAM, Crooijmans<br />

RPMA, et al, Genome-wide assessment of worldwide chicken<br />

SNP genetic diversity indicates significant absence of rare alleles<br />

in commercial breeds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17312–17317<br />

(2008).<br />

12 Misztal I, Reliable computing in estimation of variance components.<br />

J Anim Breed Genet 125:363–370 (2008).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1771


1772<br />

13 VeseláZ,Pˇribyl J, ˇSafus P, Vostr´yL,ˇSeba K and ˇStolc L, Breeding value<br />

for type traits in beef cattle in the Czech Republic. Czech J Anim Sci<br />

50:385–393 (2005).<br />

14 KrejčováH, Pˇribyl J, PˇribylováJ, ˇStípková M and Mielenz N, Genetic<br />

evaluation of daily gains of dual-purpose bulls using a random<br />

regression model. Czech J Anim Sci 53:227–237 (2008).<br />

15 OravcováM, Margetín M, PeˇskovičováD, Daňo J, Milerski M,<br />

Hetényi L, et al, Factors affecting ewe’s milk fat and protein content<br />

and relationships between milk yield and milk components. Czech<br />

JAnimSci52:189–198 (2007).<br />

16 Pˇribyl J, KrejčováH, Pˇribylová J, Misztal I, BohmanováJ and<br />

ˇStípková M, Trajectory of body weight of performance tested dualpurpose<br />

bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 52:315–324 (2007).<br />

17 Pˇribyl J, KrejčováH, Pˇribylová J, Misztal I, Tsuruta S and Mielenz N,<br />

Models for evaluation of growth of performance tested bulls. Czech<br />

JAnimSci53:45–54 (2008).<br />

18 Pˇribyl J, PˇribylováJ,Krejčová H and Mielenz N, Comparison of different<br />

traits to evaluate the growth of bulls. Czech J Anim Sci 53:273–283<br />

(2008).<br />

19 Zavadilová L, Jamrozik J and Schaeffer LR, Genetic parameters for testday<br />

model with random regressions for production traits of Czech<br />

Holstein cattle. Czech J Anim Sci 50:142–154 (2005).<br />

20 Vostr´yL, Pˇribyl J, Jakubec V, Veselá Z and Majzlík I, Selection of a<br />

suitable definition of environment for the estimation of genotype<br />

× environment interaction in the weaning weight of beef cattle.<br />

Czech J Anim Sci 53:407–417 (2008).<br />

21 Vostr´yL,Pˇribyl J, Veselá Z and Jakubec V, Selection of a suitable data<br />

set and model for the estimation of genetic parameters of the<br />

weaning weight in beef cattle. Arch Tierz 50:562–574 (2007).<br />

22 Mészáros G, Wolf J and Kadlečík O, Factors affecting the functional<br />

length of productive life in Slovak Pinzgau cows. Czech J Anim Sci<br />

53:9–97 (2008).<br />

23 Páchová E,ZavadilováLandSölkner J,Geneticevaluationofthelength<br />

of productive life in Holstein cattle in the Czech. Czech J Anim Sci<br />

50:493–498 (2005).<br />

24 Bozdogan H, Akaike’s information criterion and recent developments<br />

in information complexity. J Math Psychol 44:62–91 (2000).<br />

25 Guo Z and Schaeffer LR, Random regression submodel comparison,<br />

in 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production<br />

(WCGALP), Montpellier, France, 19–23 August (2002).<br />

26 Kaas ER and Raftery AE, Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90:773–795<br />

(1995).<br />

27 Sorensen D and Waagepetersen R, Model selection for prediction of<br />

breeding value, in 7thWorldCongressonGeneticsAppliedtoLivestock<br />

Production (WCGALP), Montpellier, France, 19–23 August (2002).<br />

28 Kaps M and Lamberson W, Biostatistics for Animal Science. CABI<br />

Publishing, Wallingford, UK (2004).<br />

29 Pˇribyl J, [A way of using markers for farm animals selection] (in Czech).<br />

Ziv Vyr 40:375–382 (1995).<br />

30 Schaeffer LR, Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy<br />

cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 123:218–223 (2006).<br />

31 Baierl A, Bogdan M, Frommlet F and Futschik A, On locating multiple<br />

interacting quantitative trait loci in intercross designs. Genetics<br />

173:1693–1703 (2006).<br />

32 Szyda J and Komisarek J,Statistical modeling of candidate gene effects<br />

on milk production traits in dairy cattle. JDairySci90:2971–2979<br />

(2007).<br />

33 Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ and Goddard ME, Prediction of total<br />

genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics<br />

157:1819–1829 (2001).<br />

34 Muir WM, Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated<br />

breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative<br />

trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 124:342–355<br />

(2007).<br />

35 Dekkers JCM, Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic<br />

selection using selection index theory. J Anim Breed Genet<br />

124:331–341 (2007).<br />

36 Falconer DS and Mackay TFC, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.<br />

Longmans Green, Harlow, UK (1996).<br />

37 Milerski M, The Booroola (FecB) gene in Czech Merinolandschaft<br />

population, in 59th Annual Meeting of EAAP (Book of abstracts<br />

191), Vilnius, Lithuania, 24–27 August (2008).<br />

38 Soller M and Genizi A, The efficiency of experimental designs for the<br />

detection of linkage between a marker locus and a locus affecting a<br />

quantitative trait in segregating populations. Biometrics 34:47–55<br />

(1978).<br />

www.soci.org J Pribyl et al.<br />

39 Dolezal M, Schwarzenbacher H, Soller M, Sölkner J and Visscher PM,<br />

Multiple-marker mapping for selective DNA pooling within large<br />

families. JDairySci91:2864–2873 (2008).<br />

40 Visscher PM, Proportion of the variation in genetic composition in<br />

backcrossing programs explained by genetic markers. J Hered<br />

87:136–138 (1996).<br />

41 Freyer G, Sørensen P, Kühn C and Weikard R, Investigations in the<br />

character of QTL affecting negatively correlated milk traits. JAnim<br />

Breed Genet 121:40–51 (2004).<br />

42 Ansari-Mahyari S, Sørensen AC, Lund MS, Thomsen H and Berg P,<br />

Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping<br />

strategiesindairycattlebreedingschemes.JDairySci91:1628–1639<br />

(2008).<br />

43 Calus MPL and Veerkamp RF, Accuracy of breeding value when using<br />

and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value<br />

estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. J Anim Breed<br />

Genet 124:362–368 (2007).<br />

44 Gengler N, Abras S, Verkenne C, Vanderick S, Szydlowski M and<br />

Renaville R, Accuracy of prediction of gene content in large animal<br />

populations and its use for candidate gene detection and genetic<br />

evaluation. JDairySci91:1652–1659 (2008).<br />

45 Szyda J, Ptak E, Komisarek J and Zarnecki A, Practical application of<br />

daughter yield deviations in dairy cattle breeding. J Appl Genet<br />

49:83–191 (2008).<br />

46 Simianer H and Stricker C, Mapping of quantitative trait loci,<br />

in Genomics and Biotechnology in Livestock Breeding, ed. by<br />

Schellander K, Li N, Neeteson AM and Wimmers K. Shaker, Aachen,<br />

pp. 47–58 (2002).<br />

47 Bílek K, Knoll A, Stratil A, SvobodováK, Horák P, BechyňováR, et al,<br />

Analysis of mRNA expression of CNN3, DCN, FBN2, POSTN, SPARC<br />

and YWHAQ genes in porcine foetal and adult skeletal muscles.<br />

Czech J Anim Sci 53:181–186 (2008).<br />

48 Pan CY, Lan XY, Chen H, Yang DY, Hua LS, Yang XB, et al, ADdeI PCR-<br />

RFLP detecting a novel missense mutation of the POU1F1 gene<br />

showednoeffectsongrowthtraitsincattle.Czech J Anim Sci<br />

53:532–527 (2008).<br />

49 Spangler ML, Sapp RL, Bertrand JK, MacNeil MD and Rekaya R,<br />

Different methods of selecting animals for genotyping to maximize<br />

the amount of genetic information known in the population. JAnim<br />

Sci 86:2471–2479 (2008).<br />

50 Daley JW and Shepherd RK, Utilization of F1 information in estimating<br />

QTL effects in F2 crosses between outbred lines. J Anim Breed Genet<br />

125:35–44 (2008).<br />

51 Weller JI, Kashi Y and Soller M, Power of daughter and granddaughter<br />

design for determining linkage between marker loci and<br />

quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. JDairySci 73:2525–2537<br />

(1990).<br />

52 Freyer G and Vukasinovic N,Comparison of granddaughterdesign and<br />

general pedigree design analysis of QTL in dairy cattle: a simulation<br />

study. Czech J Anim Sci 50:545–552 (2005).<br />

53 Goliáˇsová E and Wolf J, Herd specific effects of the ESR gene on litter<br />

size and production traits in Czech Large White sows. Czech J Anim<br />

Sci 49:373–382 (2004).<br />

54 Legarra A and Misztal I, Technical note: Computing strategies in<br />

genome-wide selection. JDairySci91:360–366 (2008).<br />

55 Meuwissen THE and Goddard ME, Prediction of identity by descent<br />

probabilities from marker-haplotypes. Genet Sel Evol 33:605–634<br />

(2001).<br />

56 Humpolíček P, Urban T, Matouˇsek V and TvrdoňZ,Effectofestrogen<br />

receptor, follicle stimulating hormone and myogenin genes on the<br />

performance of Large White sows. Czech J Anim Sci 52:334–340<br />

(2007).<br />

57 Vykoukalová Z, Knoll A and Cepica S, Porcine perilipin (PLIN) gene:<br />

structure, polymorphism and association study in Large White pigs.<br />

Czech J Anim Sci 54:359–364 (2009).<br />

58 HradeckáE,Čítek J, Panicke L, ˇRehout V and HanusováL,Therelation<br />

of GH1, GHR and DGAT1 polymorphisms with estimated breeding<br />

values for milk production traits of German Holstein sires. Czech J<br />

Anim Sci 53:238–246 (2008).<br />

59 Matějíček A, MatějíčkováJ, NěmcováE, JandurováOM, ˇStípkováM,<br />

Bouˇska J, et al, Joint effects of CSN3 and LGB genotypes and their<br />

relation to breeding values of milk production parameters in Czech<br />

Fleckvieh. Czech J Anim Sci 52:83–87 (2007).<br />

60 Matějíček A, MatějíčkováJ, ˇStípkováM, HanuˇsO, GenčurováV,<br />

Kysel’ováJ, et al, JointeffectsofCSN3 and LGB genes on milk<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773


Evaluation of animals by simple heritable markers www.soci.org<br />

quality and coagulation properties in Czech Fleckvieh. Czech J Anim<br />

Sci 53:246–252 (2008).<br />

61 VanRaden PM and Wiggans GR, Derivation, calculation, and use of<br />

national animal model information. JDairySci74:2737–2746 (1991).<br />

62 Neuner S, Emmerling R, Thaller G and Götz KU, Strategies for<br />

estimating genetic parameters in Marker-Assisted Best Linear<br />

Unbiased Predictors models in dairy cattle. JDairySci91:4344–4354<br />

(2008).<br />

63 Harder B, Bennewitz J, Reinsch N, Thaller G, Thomsen H, Kühn C, et al,<br />

Mapping of quantitative trait loci for lactation persistency traits in<br />

German Holstein dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 123:89–96 (2006).<br />

64 Uleberg E, Widerøe IS, Grindflek E, Szyda J, Lien S and Meuwissen THE,<br />

FinemappingofaQTLforintramuscularfatonporcinechromosome<br />

6 using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping.<br />

J Anim Breed Genet 122:1–6 (2005).<br />

65 Goddard ME and Hayes BJ, Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet<br />

124:323–330 (2007).<br />

66 Weller JI, Golik M, Seroussi E, Ezra E and Ron M, Population-wide<br />

analysis of a QTL affecting milk-fat production in the Israeli Holstein<br />

population. JDairySci86:2219–2227 (2003).<br />

67 SAS, SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (2005).<br />

68 LiFE,MeiSQ,DengCY,JiangSW,ZuoB,ZhengR,et al, Association<br />

of a microsatellite flanking FSHB gene with reproductive traits and<br />

reproductive tract components in pigs. CzechJAnimSci 53:139–144<br />

(2008).<br />

69 MichalcováA and Krupová Z, Influence of composite κ-casein and<br />

β-lactoglobulin genotypes on composition, rennetability and heat<br />

stability of milk of cows of Slovak Pied breed. Czech J Anim Sci<br />

52:292–298 (2007).<br />

70 Tsuruta S and Misztal I, Technical note: Computing options for genetic<br />

evaluation with a large number of genetic markers. JAnimSci<br />

86:1514–1518 (2008).<br />

71 Long N, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA and Avendaño S, Machine<br />

learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic<br />

selection: application to early mortality in broilers. J Anim Breed<br />

Genet 124:377–389 (2007).<br />

72 VanRaden PM, Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.<br />

JDairySci91:4414–4423 (2008).<br />

73 Hayes BJ, Visscher PM and Goddard ME, Increased accuracy of artificial<br />

selection by using the realised relationship matrix. Genet Res Camb<br />

91:47–60 (2009).<br />

74 Guo SW, Variation in genetic identity among relatives. Hum Hered<br />

46:61–70 (1996).<br />

75 Misztal I, Legarra A and Aguilar I, Computing procedures for genetic<br />

evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic<br />

information. JDairySci92:4648–4655 (2009).<br />

76 Legarra A, Aguilar I and Misztal I, A relationship matrix including full<br />

pedigreeandgenomicinformation.JDairySci92:4656–4663(2009).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1765–1773 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1773


1774<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 26 May 2009 Revised: 25 March 2010 Accepted: 29 March 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 22 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.3998<br />

Root colonisation by the arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices alters<br />

the quality of strawberry fruits (Fragaria ×<br />

ananassa Duch.) at different nitrogen levels<br />

Vilma Castellanos-Morales, a∗ Javier Villegas, b Silvia Wendelin, c<br />

Horst Vierheilig, d Reinhard Eder c and Raúl Cárdenas-Navarro a<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increase the uptake of minerals from the soil, thus improving the growth<br />

of the host plant. Nitrogen (N) is a main mineral element for plant growth, as it is an essential component of numerous plant<br />

compounds affecting fruit quality. The availability of N to plants also affects the AMF–plant interaction, which suggests that the<br />

quality of fruits could be affected by both factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of three N treatments<br />

(3, 6 and 18 mmol L −1 ) in combination with inoculation with the AMF Glomus intraradices on the quality of strawberry fruits.<br />

The effects of each factor and their interaction were analysed.<br />

RESULTS: Nitrogen treatment significantly modified the concentrations of minerals and some phenolic compounds, while<br />

mycorrhization significantly affected some colour parameters and the concentrations of most phenolic compounds. Significant<br />

differences between fruits of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants were found for the majority of phenolic compounds and<br />

for some minerals in plants treated with 6 mmol L −1 N. The respective values of fruits of mycorrhizal plants were higher.<br />

CONCLUSION: Nitrogen application modified the effect of mycorrhization on strawberry fruit quality.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: mycorrhizal; nitrogen; strawberry; quality; fruit<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Most land plants benefit from their interaction with symbiotic<br />

soil-borne fungi known as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF).<br />

In this symbiosis the AMF receives carbon from the plant, while<br />

the fungus takes up nutrients with its extraradical mycelium and<br />

provides them to the host plant. 1<br />

The uptake of nitrogen (N) by the extraradical mycelium has<br />

been shown before and this N is available to the host plant, 2,3<br />

so the AMF improves the N status of the host. 4,5 Nevertheless, it<br />

also has been reported that the N availability in the soil affects the<br />

dynamic of plant–AMF association. 4,6<br />

Nitrogen is an essential element for plant growth. Owing<br />

to its role in the synthesis of proteins, nucleic acids, various<br />

coenzymes and many products of secondary plant metabolism, 7<br />

it is important for strawberry fruit quality. It has been shown<br />

that a leaf N concentration below 19 g kg −1 (deficiency) causes<br />

chlorosis of strawberry leaves, thus decreasing the leaf area, fruit<br />

size and anthocyanin concentration, 8 whereas an excess of foliar N<br />

(∼40 g kg −1 ) promotes vegetative growth, delays fruit maturation<br />

and causes a loss of firmness in fruits, thus reducing quality. 9,10<br />

Strawberry quality and consumer preference for strawberry<br />

fruits are determined by parameters such as size, firmness, levels<br />

of soluble sugars and acid concentration, the last of which affects<br />

the aromatic compounds that impart flavour and aroma. 11,12<br />

Strawberry fruits possess antioxidant activity owing to their high<br />

content of anthocyanins, flavonoids, phenolic acids and other<br />

compounds. 13<br />

Recent data suggest that mycorrhization not only has a positive<br />

effect on various plant growth parameters but can also affect<br />

the quality of crop products. For example, root colonisation by<br />

different AMF enhances the essential oil concentration in a number<br />

of plants from different plant families such as oregano (Origanum<br />

vulgare), 14 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), 15,16 menthol mint (Mentha<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Vilma Castellanos-Morales, Estación Experimental del<br />

Zaidín, Prof. Albareda 1, Apdo 419, E-18008 Granada, Spain.<br />

E-mail: vilma c 99@yahoo.com<br />

a Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias y Forestales, Universidad<br />

Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Km 9.5, Carretera Morelia-Zinapécuaro,<br />

CP 58880, Tarímbaro, Michoacán, Mexico<br />

b Instituto de Investigaciones Químico-Biológicas, Universidad Michoacana de<br />

San Nicolás de Hidalgo, CP 58000, Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, Michoacán,<br />

Mexico<br />

c Federal College and <strong>Research</strong> Institute for Viticulture and Pomology,<br />

Wienerstrasse 74, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria<br />

d Estación Experimental del Zaidín (CSIC), E-18008 Granada, Spain<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Effects of AMF and N level on quality of strawberry fruits www.soci.org<br />

arvensis) 17 andcoriander(CoriandrumsativumL.). 18 Inothersplants<br />

such as alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), 19–21 barrel medic (Medicago<br />

truncatula), 22 red clover (Trifolium pratense) 23 and soybean (Glycine<br />

max L.), 24 increases in flavonoid levels after mycorrhization have<br />

been reported.<br />

There are several reports on strawberry plants concerning<br />

inoculation with AMF and its effects on plant growth. It has been<br />

shown that AMF root colonisation stimulates plant growth, 25<br />

modifies the production of runners, 26 enhances photosynthesis 27<br />

and increases the number of fruits. 28 However, to the best<br />

of our knowledge, there are currently no data on how AMF<br />

root colonisation in combination with different N levels affects<br />

strawberry fruit quality parameters such as colour, soluble sugars,<br />

acids, minerals and phenolic compounds.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

The experiment was conducted in a ‘shade’-type greenhouse<br />

with 30% shade at the Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias<br />

y Forestales (IIAF), Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de<br />

Hidalgo (UMSNH), Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico. Maximum and<br />

minimum temperatures in the greenhouse varied between 28 and<br />

32 ◦ C and between 8 and 18 ◦ C respectively.<br />

Plants of the strawberry cultivar ‘Aromas’ were used that had<br />

previously been grown in a sterilised (95 ◦ C water/steam, 40 min)<br />

substrate of coconut fibre/perlite (1 : 3 v/v) under greenhouse<br />

conditions. Before the experiment was established, the absence of<br />

AMF in the roots was verified by the ink and vinegar technique, 29<br />

modifying the duration of immersion in KOH and ink/vinegar<br />

solution (7 and 5 min respectively). Before planting, roots were<br />

disinfected by submerging them for 20 s in 20 g L−1 sodium<br />

hypochlorite solution and rinsing them in water.<br />

The inoculum was prepared with spores of Glomus intraradices<br />

cultivated in liquid medium (3.5 × 106 spores L−1 , 90% viability;<br />

Premier Tech Biotechnologies Company, Quebec, Canada), which<br />

was diluted with fitagel (Sigma P-8169, Saint Louis, MO, USA)<br />

solution at 50 g L−1 to obtain a final concentration of about 5×104 spores L−1 . The viability of spores was determined according to<br />

the method of An and Hendrix. 30<br />

Eighteen days after setting up the experiment, each plant<br />

received 2 mL of inoculum applied directly to the recently formed<br />

roots. One month later, after staining, 29 the percentage of root<br />

colonisation was determined by the gridline intersect method. 31<br />

The experiment was organised as a full factorial, completely<br />

randomised design with two factors: inoculation (two levels:<br />

mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants) and N concentration<br />

in the nutrient solution (three levels: 3, 6 and 18 mmol L−1 ).<br />

The six treatments were replicated four times, producing 24 experimental<br />

units with ten plants each. Every second day, all plants<br />

were irrigated up to substrate saturation. Nitrogen was supplied<br />

as NO − 3<br />

and the cation/anion ratio was kept constant by varying<br />

the concentration of SO 2−<br />

4 . When N was below 18 mmol L−1 ,the<br />

cation concentrations were maintained as follows: K + ,3;Ca 2+ ,3.5;<br />

Mg 2+ , 1.5 mmol L −1 . They were increased in the 18 mmol L −1 N<br />

treatment: K + ,6.5;Ca 2+ ,7.5;Mg 2+ , 3.25 mmol L −1 .Inallnutrient<br />

solutions the concentration of phosphorus (P) was 0.3 mmol L −1 .<br />

The other nutrients in the solutions were: H3BO3, 20; CuSO4 ·5H2O,<br />

0.5; Fe-EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid iron (III) sodium<br />

salt), 15; MnSO4·H2O, 12; (NH4)6Mo7O24 ·4H2O, 0.05; ZnSO4 ·7H2O,<br />

3 µmol L −1 . The pH was adjusted to 5.5 at every application date.<br />

Mature fruits of each experimental unit were collected between<br />

140 and 160 days after setting up the experiment. At sampling<br />

time the fruits were separated into two equal batches. One batch<br />

was used for the determination of fruit fresh weight, diameter,<br />

length and Brix grade (total solids). The last measurement was<br />

done at 25 ◦ C using a refractometer (ATAGO CO., LTD) (N-1α). The<br />

other batch was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −20 ◦ C.<br />

Prior to chemical and colour analyses, these samples were ground<br />

to a fine powder (Retsch MM200 mill, Thomas Scientific, New<br />

Jersey, United States) in liquid N2 and then freeze-dried.<br />

Titratable acidity is a measure of organic acids in a sample and<br />

is determined by adding enough alkali of known molarity to the<br />

sample to neutralise all acids present. For the measurement of<br />

titratable acidity, 0.1 g of freeze-dried fruit was mixed with 5 mL<br />

of distilled water and shaken, then 0.05 mol L −1 NaOH was added<br />

up to a pH of 8.1. The results are expressed as % citric acid.<br />

For macro- and micro-nutrient determination, 10 mL of distilled<br />

water was added to 0.2 g of ground sample. The mixture was<br />

sonicated (FS30H, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, United State)<br />

and then centrifuged (2744 × g ′ , 10 min). The supernatant was<br />

filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane (Millipore, Thebarton, South<br />

Australia). For macronutrient measurement, 9 mL of 0.5 mol L −1<br />

HCl and 200 µL of lanthanum oxide were added to 1 mL of the<br />

filtrate. For micronutrient determination, 200 µL of concentrated<br />

HCl was added to 9 mL of the filtrate. All samples were shaken on<br />

a vortex for 5 min and their mineral contents were quantifed<br />

by atomic absorption (Solar 939, ATI Unicam, Basingstoke,<br />

U.K).<br />

Soluble sugars were extracted by the method of Gomez<br />

et al., 32 with some modifications. All extractions were carried<br />

outat4 ◦ C. Briefly, 4 mL of methanol/water (1 : 1 v/v) and 1 mL<br />

of chloroform were added to 15 mg of lyophilised sample. The<br />

mixture was shaken on a vortex for 2 min and then on a horizontal<br />

agitator (Libline 4638, Melrose Park, Illinois) at medium speed<br />

for 30 min. After centrifugation (1585 × g ′ , 30 min), two liquid<br />

phases separated by the plant powder were obtained. A 2.8 mL<br />

volume of the methanol/water supernatant was recovered and<br />

dried in a vacuum evaporator (Labconco 7810000 Speed-Vac,<br />

Kansas City, Missouri). The resulting pellet was stored at −20 ◦ C<br />

overnight. Next day it was redissolved in 2 mL of distilled water<br />

by shaking on a vortex for 20 min. The aqueous extract was then<br />

poured into a tube with 0.015 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone (Sigma<br />

P6755) to remove residual phenols by crosslinking. After shaking<br />

on a vortex for 20 min, the tube was centrifuged (1585 × g ′ ,<br />

90 min). The supernatant was recovered using a 1 mL insulin<br />

syringe and stored at −20 ◦ C for the direct measurement of<br />

glucose and the indirect measurement of fructose and sucrose<br />

by the enzymatic method 33 with a photometer (Multiskan<br />

Ascent 354, Thermolabsystem, Finlandia imported by Labtech,<br />

Mexico) at 340 nm, using a calibration curve in the range<br />

0–0.2g L −1 glucose (Baker 1916-01, Xalostoc, Edo. México). To<br />

verify the correct measurement of soluble sugars, controls of<br />

fructose (Sigma F0127) and sucrose (Sigma S7903) were used.<br />

Before measurement the extract was diluted with distilled water<br />

(1 : 20 v/v).<br />

Total phenols and the anthocyanins cyanidin-3-glucoside and<br />

pelargonidin-3-glucoside were extracted by the method of<br />

Markakis, 34 with some modifications. Briefly, 5 mL of methanol/HCl<br />

(1 : 5 v/v) was added to 0.1 g of lyophilised sample. The mixture<br />

was sonicated for 300 s and then centrifuged (2744 × g ′ ,10min).<br />

The supernatant was filtered (0.45 µm membrane, Millipore) and<br />

the filtrate obtained was used for the measurement of total<br />

phenol and anthocyanin concentrations. Colour parameters and<br />

the absorbance at 500 nm were also measured in the same filtrate.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1775


1776<br />

Total phenol concentration was quantified by the Folin–<br />

Ciocalteu method, 35 with minor modifications. The volumes of<br />

sample, Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent and sodium carbonate<br />

were reduced to one-tenth of those used in the original method,<br />

giving a final volume of 20 mL. The measurement was made<br />

at 765 nm (Spectrophotometer – Cintra 10e, GBC, Dandenong,<br />

Victoria, Australia), using a linear calibration curve of caffeic acid<br />

(0–250 mg L −1 ) to calculate the total phenol concentration.<br />

Strawberry fruit colour was determined by measuring the<br />

absorbance at 500 nm 36 with a spectrophotometer (Shanghai,<br />

Analytical Instrument LTD, China) (HP-8452A, Cheadle Heath,<br />

Stockport Cheshire, UK). Additionally, colour was measured using<br />

a photometer (Licor-2000, DR Lange, Dusseldorf, Germany) in<br />

terms of L ∗ , a ∗ and b ∗ values, where L ∗ defines lightness (from<br />

white = 100 to black = 0), a ∗ defines red/greenness (from −60<br />

to +60) and b ∗ defines blue/yellowness (from −60 to +60). From<br />

the a ∗ and b ∗ values the following colour parameters were also<br />

calculated: colour evolution (a ∗ /b ∗ ), shade (tan −1 (b ∗ /a ∗ ), ranging<br />

from 0 ◦ (red) to 90 ◦ (yellow) to 270 ◦ (blue)) and chromaticity<br />

(C ∗ = (a 2 + b 2 ) 1/2 , indicating the vividness of colour and ranging<br />

from 0 (discoloured) to 60 (powerful)).<br />

Phenolic acids and flavonols were extracted by acid hydrolysis. 37<br />

Briefly, 7.5 mL of 5.33 g L −1 ascorbic acid solution, 12.5 mL of<br />

methanol (liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry grade) and<br />

5mLof6molL −1 HCl were added to 0.25 g of sample. The mixture<br />

was sonicated for 2 min, the air in the mixture was replaced with<br />

gaseousN2 (1–1.5 min)andthemixturewasshakenonahorizontal<br />

agitator (35 ◦ C) for 16 h. The cold sample was filtered (0.45 µm<br />

membrane, Millipore), concentrated in a rotavapor (35 ◦ C) and<br />

redissolved in 1 mL of methanol. This solution was filtered (0.45 µm<br />

membrane, Millipore) and 10 µL of the filtrate was used for the<br />

measurement of phenolic acids and flavonols.<br />

Phenolic compounds (anthocyanins, phenolic acids and<br />

flavonols) were quantified by reverse phase high-performance<br />

liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) 38 using an Agilent 1090 Aminoquant<br />

HPLC system (Waldbrot, Germany). Each 10 µL sample was<br />

injected for separation on two narrow-bore HP-ODS Hypersil RP-<br />

18 columns (Shandon, U.K) (5 µm, 200 mm × 2.1 mm and 5 µm,<br />

100 mm × 2.1 mm) linked in series. A linear gradient of 5 g L −1<br />

formic acid (pH 2.3) and methanol at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min −1<br />

was used. The column temperature was 40 ◦ C and detection was<br />

achieved at 320 nm for all compounds. The standards used and the<br />

concentration ranges of their calibration curves were as follows:<br />

callistephin (Extrasynthese 0907S, Lyon, France), 1–200 mg L −1 ;<br />

kuromanin (Extrasynthese 0915S), 1–200 mg L −1 ; gallic acid<br />

monohydrate (Roth 7300, Karlsruhe, Germany), 10.9–545 mg L −1 ;<br />

p-coumaric acid (Roth 9908), 26.2–1308 mg L −1 p-coumaric acid;<br />

ferulic acid (Roth 9936), 9.8–490 mg L −1 ; ellagic acid (Sigma<br />

E2250), 8.1–81.4 mg L −1 ; quercetin dehydrate (Extrasynthese<br />

1135S), 8.7–436 mg L −1 ; kaempferol (Fluka 60010, Saint Louis,<br />

MO, USA), 8.5–426 mg L −1 ; catechin (Roth 6200), 9.2–460 mg L −1 .<br />

The results are presented as means of four replicates (each<br />

replicate consists of fruits from all plants in one experimental<br />

unit). Statistical analyses were performed using SYSTAT for<br />

Windows, Version 9.01 (Systat Software versión 9.01, Cranes<br />

Software International, LTD). The effects of each single factor<br />

(N concentration and inoculation) and their interaction (N<br />

concentration × inoculation) were evaluated using two-way<br />

analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multiple comparisons were made<br />

using Tukey’s test. Differences at P < 0.05 were considered<br />

significant.<br />

www.soci.org V Castellanos-Morales et al.<br />

Table 1. Fresh weight, diameter and length of fruits of strawberry<br />

plants inoculated with Glomus intraradices and fertilised with different<br />

nitrogen concentrations in irrigation water<br />

Factor Fresh weight (g per fruit) Diameter (cm) Length (cm)<br />

Nitrogen concentration (mmol L −1 )<br />

3 14.19a 2.98a 3.30a<br />

6 13.14a 2.93a 3.22a<br />

18 13.36a 2.93a 3.26a<br />

Inoculation<br />

M 13.39a 2.93a 3.22a<br />

NM 13.73a 2.96a 3.26a<br />

Interaction (nitrogen concentration × inoculation)<br />

3 × M 14.44a 3.01a 3.23a<br />

3 × NM 13.94a 2.96a 3.27a<br />

6 × M 12.47a 2.88a 3.19a<br />

6 × NM 13.80a 2.98a 3.25a<br />

18 × M 13.27a 2.90a 3.27a<br />

18 × NM 13.46a 2.96a 3.25a<br />

Each value represents the mean of four replicates. Two-way ANOVA was<br />

applied for each parameter; when statistical differences were found,<br />

aTukeytest(P < 0.05) was conducted independently for nitrogen<br />

concentration (3, 6 and 18 mmol L −1 ), inoculation (mycorrhizal (M) and<br />

non-mycorrhizal (NM)) and nitrogen concentration × inoculation (3 ×<br />

M, 3 × NM, 6 × M, 6 × NM, 18 × Mand18× NM). For each factor,<br />

means with the same letter in a column do not differ significantly.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Tables 1–5 show the results for the effects of the two factors and<br />

their interaction on the variables evaluated. At the end of the<br />

experiment the extent of AMF colonisation ranged from 65 to<br />

80%. None of the treatments affected the fresh weight, diameter<br />

and length of fruits (Table 1).<br />

In terms of colour, different N concentrations resulted in statistically<br />

significant effects only on fruit lightness and absorbance<br />

at 500 nm (Table 2). Lightness was significantly higher and absorbance<br />

was significantly lower in fruits of plants fertilised with<br />

3 mmol L −1 N than in fruits of plants treated with 6 mmol L −1<br />

N, but both values did not differ from those in fruits of plants<br />

fertilised with 18 mmol L −1 N. Mycorrhization resulted in statistically<br />

significant effects on all colour parameters except colour<br />

evolution and shade. Fruits of mycorrhizal plants showed a 2.0%<br />

increase in lightness and 14.3, 12.9, 13.9 and 21.2% decreases<br />

in red/greenness, blue/yellowness, chromaticity and absorbance<br />

respectively compared with fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants. Increasing<br />

N concentration in the irrigation solution did not lead<br />

to statistically significant differences in colour parameters between<br />

fruits within each mycorrhizal treatment. Nor were there<br />

significant differences between fruits of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal<br />

plants fertilised with the same N concentration<br />

(Table 2).<br />

Titratable acidity, glucose, fructose and Brix grade were lowest<br />

in fruits of plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 N (Table 3). Their<br />

titratable acidity, glucose and fructose values were significantly<br />

lower than those in fruits of plants treated with 6 mmol L −1 N,<br />

while their Brix grade was significantly lower than that in fruits of<br />

plants treated with 18 mmol L −1 N. Mycorrhization modified only<br />

fructose concentration, with fruits of mycorrhizal plants containing<br />

8.5% less fructose than those of non-mycorrhizal plants. When the<br />

applied N was increased, a significant difference in titratable acidity<br />

between mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants treated with the<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782


Effects of AMF and N level on quality of strawberry fruits www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Lightness (L ∗ ), red/greenness (a ∗ ), blue/yellowness (b ∗ ), colour evolution (a ∗ /b ∗ ), shade (tan −1 (b ∗ /a ∗ )), chromaticity (C ∗ = (a 2 + b 2 ) 1/2 )<br />

and absorbance at 500 nm of fruits of strawberry plants inoculated with Glomus intraradices and fertilised with different nitrogen concentrations in<br />

irrigation water<br />

Factor Lightness Red/greenness Blue/yellowness Colour evolution Shade Chromaticity Absorbance<br />

Nitrogen concentration (mmol L −1 )<br />

3 84.93a 27.69a 17.16a 1.62a 31.77a 32.59a 0.54b<br />

6 83.31b 31.07a 19.79a 1.57a 32.47a 36.85a 0.64a<br />

18 84.31a 29.50a 18.18a 1.63a 31.67a 34.67a 0.57ab<br />

Inoculation<br />

M 84.99a 27.45b 17.26b 1.59a 32.21a 32.44b 0.52b<br />

NM 83.37b 31.38a 19.49a 1.62a 31.72a 36.95a 0.63a<br />

Interaction (nitrogen concentration × inoculation)<br />

3 × M 85.72a 25.98a 16.52a 1.57a 32.47a 30.80a 0.48b<br />

3 × NM 84.14ab 29.40a 17.80a 1.66a 31.07a 34.38a 0.59ab<br />

6 × M 83.80ab 29.40a 18.68a 1.57a 32.56a 34.85a 0.60ab<br />

6 × NM 82.82b 32.74a 20.90a 1.56a 32.38a 38.85a 0.68a<br />

18 × M 85.46ac 26.98a 16.58a 1.63a 31.59a 31.69a 0.50b<br />

18 × NM 83.16bc 32.02a 19.78a 1.62a 31.72a 37.65a 0.63ab<br />

Each value represents the mean of four replicates. Two-way ANOVA was applied for each parameter; when statistical differences were found, a Tukey<br />

test (P < 0.05) was conducted independently for nitrogen concentration (3, 6 and 18 mmol L −1 ), inoculation (mycorrhizal (M) and non-mycorrhizal<br />

(NM)) and nitrogen concentration × inoculation (3 × M, 3 × NM, 6 × M, 6 × NM, 18 × Mand18× NM). For each factor, means with different letters<br />

in a column differ significantly.<br />

Table 3. Titritable acidity, soluble sugar concentrations and Brix<br />

grade of fruits of strawberry plants inoculated with Glomus intraradices<br />

and fertilised with different nitrogen concentrations in irrigation water<br />

Titratable Soluble sugars (g kg −1 DM)<br />

acidity (%<br />

Factor citric acid) Glucose Fructose Sucrose Brix grade<br />

Nitrogen concentration (mmol L −1 )<br />

3 1.28b 136.63b 148.96b 94.16a 4.93b<br />

6 1.36a 153.21a 167.54a 62.68a 5.39ab<br />

18 1.30b 140.50ab 149.35b 83.07a 6.09a<br />

Inoculation<br />

M 1.30a 139.85a 148.99b 80.45a 5.96a<br />

NM 1.33a 147.04a 161.58a 79.45a 5.99a<br />

Interaction (nitrogen concentration × inoculation)<br />

3 × M 1.21c 132.02c 141.96c 113.10a 5.05bc<br />

3 × NM 1.35ab 141.24bc 155.96bc 75.21a 4.81c<br />

6 × M 1.38a 146.34bc 158.85bc 45.83a 5.30abc<br />

6 × NM 1.34ab 160.07ab 176.24ab 79.54a 5.48abc<br />

18 × M 1.31ab 141.20bc 146.16c 82.43a 6.17a<br />

18 × NM 1.28bc 139.81bc 152.54bc 83.71a 6.00ab<br />

Each value represents the mean of four replicates. Two-way ANOVA was<br />

applied for each parameter; when statistical differences were found,<br />

aTukeytest(P < 0.05) was conducted independently for nitrogen<br />

concentration (3, 6 and 18 mmol L −1 ), inoculation (mycorrhizal (M) and<br />

non-mycorrhizal (NM)) and nitrogen concentration × inoculation (3 ×<br />

M, 3 × NM, 6 × M, 6 × NM, 18 × Mand18× NM). For each factor,<br />

means with different letters in a column differ significantly.<br />

same N concentration was observed only in the treatment with<br />

3 mmol L −1 N.<br />

Some nutrient concentrations were significantly different between<br />

fruits of plants treated with 3 and 18 mmol L −1 N (Table 4).<br />

Fruits from the treatment with 3 mmol L −1 N contained 9.4, 13.3,<br />

61.0 and 48.0% more K, Mg, Fe and Zn respectively and 11.3% less<br />

Ca than fruits of plants fertilised with 18 mmol L −1 N. The Mn concentration<br />

in fruits of plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 Nwassignificantly<br />

higher than that in fruits of plants treated with 6 mmol L −1<br />

N. Fruits of mycorrhizal plants had higher K and Cu concentrations<br />

but lower Mn concentration than fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants.<br />

Mycorrhization significantlymodified the Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn<br />

concentrations in fruits when the N applied was changed from 3<br />

to 18 mmol L −1 , and the K concentration in fruits when N changed<br />

from 3 to 6 mmol L −1 . With the exception of Ca, the concentrations<br />

of all elements studied were higher in fruits of plants fertilised with<br />

3 mmol L −1 N. Significantdifferences between fruits of mycorrhizal<br />

and non-mycorrhizal plants of the same N treatment were found<br />

for Cu, Zn and Mn concentrations. Fruits of mycorrhizal plants had<br />

38.0 and 39.3% more Cu and Zn respectively in the 6 mmol L −1<br />

N treatment and 39.6% less Mn in the 18 mmol L −1 N treatment<br />

than their non-mycorrhizal counterparts.<br />

Nitrogen treatment significantly affected the concentrations<br />

of total phenols, gallic acid, ferulic acid, ellagic acid, cyanidin-<br />

3-glucoside, quercetin and kaempferol in fruits (Table 5). Fruits<br />

of plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 N had 20.5, 31.2 and 11.4%<br />

lower concentrations of total phenols, gallic acid and cyanidin-<br />

3-glucoside respectively and 21.0, 50.0 and 61.5% higher concentrations<br />

of ellagic acid, quercetin and kaempferol respectively<br />

than fruits of plants treated with 18 mmol L −1 N. Fruits of plants<br />

fertilised with 6 mmol L −1 N had a significantly higher concentration<br />

of ferulic acid than fruits of plants treated with 3<br />

and 18 mmol L −1 N. Mycorrhization significantly modified the<br />

concentrations of all phenolic compounds except pelargonidin-<br />

3-glucoside and catechin. Fruits of mycorrhizal plants had 20.0,<br />

15.0, 50.0 and 28.6% higher concentrations of p-coumaric acid,<br />

cyanidin-3-glucoside, quercetin and kaempferol respectively and<br />

29.0, 50.0 and 11.0% lower concentrations of gallic acid, ferulic<br />

acid and ellagic acid respectively than fruits of non-mycorrhizal<br />

plants.<br />

Fruits of mycorrhizal plants fertilised with 6 mmol L −1 Nhad<br />

a lower gallic acid concentration than fruits of mycorrhizal plants<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1777


1778<br />

www.soci.org V Castellanos-Morales et al.<br />

Table 4. Macro- and micronutrient concentrations of fruits of strawberry plants inoculated with Glomus intraradices and fertilised with different<br />

nitrogen concentrations in irrigation water<br />

Macronutrients (g kg −1 DM) Micronutrients (mg kg −1 DM)<br />

Factor K Na Ca Mg Cu Fe Zn Mn<br />

Nitrogen concentration (mmol L −1 )<br />

3 190.94a 2.09a 15.09b 15.04a 2.5a 6.6a 11.1a 9.9a<br />

6 174.63b 1.69a 16.25ab 14.03ab 2.5a 4.6b 10.1a 7.1b<br />

18 174.55b 2.24a 16.79a 13.28b 2.7a 4.1b 7.5b 9.3a<br />

Inoculation<br />

M 185.53a 1.93a 15.86a 13.75a 2.8a 4.8a 9.8a 7.7b<br />

NM 177.38b 2.09a 16.24a 14.49a 2.3b 5.4a 9.3a 9.9a<br />

Interaction (nitrogen concentration × inoculation)<br />

3 × M 194.90a 1.20a 14.14b 14.65a 3.1a 6.3ab 10.7abc 9.2b<br />

3 × NM 185.49ab 2.19a 16.05ab 15.43a 1.8b 6.9a 11.5ab 10.6ab<br />

6 × M 178.33b 1.49a 16.98a 14.03ac 2.9ad 5.2abc 11.7a 6.8c<br />

6 × NM 170.40b 1.89a 15.52ab 14.04ac 2.1be 4.0bc 8.4bcd 7.4c<br />

18 × M 183.38ab 2.30a 16.44a 12.56bc 2.5cde 2.9c 7.0d 7.0c<br />

18 × NM 175.72b 2.19a 17.15a 13.99ac 2.9ac 5.3abc 8.0cd 11.6a<br />

Each value represents the mean of four replicates. Two-way ANOVA was applied for each parameter; when statistical differences were found, a Tukey<br />

test (P < 0.05) was conducted independently for nitrogen concentration (3, 6 and 18 mmol L −1 ), inoculation (mycorrhizal (M) and non-mycorrhizal<br />

(NM)) and nitrogen concentration × inoculation (3 × M, 3 × NM, 6 × M, 6 × NM, 18 × Mand18× NM). For each factor, means with different letters<br />

in a column differ significantly.<br />

Table 5. Total phenol and phenolic compound concentrations of fruits of strawberry plants inoculated with Glomus intraradices and fertilised with<br />

different nitrogen concentrations in irrigation water<br />

Phenolic compounds (mg kg −1 DM)<br />

Flavonoids<br />

Phenolic acids Anthocyanins a Flavonols<br />

Factor Total phenols (g kg −1 DM) Gallic p-Coumaric Ferulic Ellagic Cya-3-glu Pel-3-glu Quercetin Kaempferol Catechin<br />

Nitrogen concentration (mmol L −1 )<br />

3 541.63b 11b 99a 1b 753a 248b 3370a 3a 21a 249a<br />

6 503.32b 10b 96a 2a 699ab 275a 3710a 2b 15b 219a<br />

18 682.04a 16a 100a 1b 622b 280a 3545a 2b 13b 368a<br />

Inoculation<br />

M 571.31a 10b 107a 1b 681b 287a 3692a 3a 18a 322a<br />

NM 580.01a 14a 89b 2a 765a 249b 3391a 2b 14b 236a<br />

Interaction (nitrogen concentration × inoculation)<br />

3 × M 590.38ab 11bc 109ab 1b 633bc 258bc 3564a 4a 21a 324a<br />

3 × NM 492.87b 11bc 89ab 1b 873a 238b 3176a 3ab 21a 174a<br />

6 × M 506.74b 6c 113a 1b 595c 314a 4198a 3ab 20a 233a<br />

6 × NM 499.89b 14ab 78b 2a 803ab 236b 3222a 2c 10b 206a<br />

18 × M 616.79ab 13ab 99ab 1b 626bc 288ac 3314a 3ac 13ab 408a<br />

18 × NM 747.29a 18a 101ab 1b 618c 272ab 3776a 2bc 12ab 328a<br />

Each value represents the mean of four replicates. Two-way ANOVA was applied for each parameter; when statistical differences were found, a Tukey<br />

test (P < 0.05) was conducted independently for nitrogen concentration (3, 6 and 18 mmol L −1 ), inoculation (mycorrhizal (M) and non-mycorrhizal<br />

(NM)) and nitrogen concentration × inoculation (3 × M, 3 × NM, 6 × M, 6 × NM, 18 × Mand18× NM). For each factor, means with different letters<br />

in a column differ significantly.<br />

a Cya-3-glu, cyanidin-3-glucoside; Pel-3-glu, pelargonidin-3-glucoside.<br />

treated with 18 mmol L −1 N and a higher cyanidin-3-glucoside<br />

concentration than fruits of mycorrhizal plants treated with<br />

3 mmol L −1 N, the difference being significant in both cases.<br />

Significant differences between fruits of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal<br />

plants of the same N treatment were found for<br />

all phenolic compounds except pelargonidin-3-glucoside and<br />

catechin. Fruits of mycorrhizal plants had higher p-coumaric acid,<br />

cyanidin-3-glucoside, quercetin and kaempferol concentrations<br />

and lower gallic acid, ferulic acid and ellagic acid concentrations<br />

than fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants when fertilised with<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782


Effects of AMF and N level on quality of strawberry fruits www.soci.org<br />

6 mmol L −1 N, and a lower ellagic acid concentration when<br />

fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 N (Table 5).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In fruit production, parameters such as fruit fresh weight, diameter<br />

and length are important for fruit quality. In a study of the effect of<br />

N application on peaches, Crisosto et al. 39 observed that different<br />

N levels did not affect the size of peach fruits, 39 indicating that the<br />

N levels tested were not a determining factor for this parameter.<br />

In our study, neither N treatment nor mycorrhization had an effect<br />

on these parameters of strawberry fruits.<br />

Colour is another important determinant of fruit quality. Shade<br />

and chromaticity are two parameters used to quantify purity,<br />

while red intensity is used for the description of colour. 40,41 The<br />

values of these variables determined in the present study are<br />

within the ranges observed previously in strawberry fruits. 42 In<br />

our experiment, some colour parameters were modified by N<br />

treatment. Fruits of plants fertilised with 6 mmol L −1 Nhadlower<br />

lightness and higher absorbance at 500 nm than fruits of plants<br />

treated with 3 mmol L −1 N.<br />

Changes in chromaticity due to mycorrhization have been reported<br />

previously in Capsicum annuum L. by Mena-Violante et al., 43<br />

who found that fruits of mycorrhizal plants had a lower chromaticity<br />

than fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants. Interestingly, our study<br />

showed a similar effect of mycorrhization on chromaticity, with<br />

a lower chromaticity being found in fruits of mycorrhizal plants<br />

than in fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants. These data suggest that<br />

the effect of mycorrhization on chromaticity is a general one and<br />

not fruit-specific. It has been proposed that the colour of strawberry<br />

fruits is closely linked with the synthesis and/or expression<br />

of pelargonidin-3-glucoside and cyanidin-3-glucoside, two principal<br />

anthocyanins. 44 In our context, this means that the colour<br />

changes we observed as a result of mycorrhization are possibly<br />

due to changes in the levels of these two anthocyanins.<br />

The flavour of strawberry fruits is determined by the balance<br />

of sugars and acids. 12 Glucose, fructose and sucrose are the most<br />

important sugars for the sensory quality of strawberry fruits,<br />

representing 99% of the total carbohydrate content. 45 Moreover,<br />

citric acid and malic acid are the most important acids in strawberry<br />

fruits. 46 Besides their impact on flavour, acids are important<br />

because they affect the gelling properties of pectin. Brix grade<br />

is a composite parameter reflecting sugars, acids, salts and others<br />

compounds soluble in water and is measured as the total soluble<br />

solids present in the fruit.<br />

In our study, titratable acidity and Brix grade varied between<br />

1.21 and 1.38% and between 4.81 and 6.17 respectively in all<br />

treatments. These values are wthin the ranges reported by Perkins-<br />

Veazie and Collins 47 for titratable acidity (0.5–1.87%) and Brix<br />

grade (5–12). Glucose and fructose concentrations were higher<br />

than sucrose concentration in all cases and the fructose/glucose<br />

ratio was about 1 : 1, in agreement with values reported previously<br />

for strawberry fruits. 42<br />

The level of applied N had a significant effect on titratable<br />

acidity, glucose and fructose concentrations and Brix grade. Fruits<br />

of plants fertilised with 6 mmol L −1 N were more acidic and their<br />

glucose and fructose concentrations were higher in comparison<br />

with fruits from other treatments, without significant differences<br />

in Brix grade. These data indicate that fruits from the 6 mmol L −1<br />

N treatment had the best quality according to Mitcham. 48 In our<br />

experiment, foliar area was also measured (data not shown). The<br />

higher production of sugars in the 6 mmol L −1 N treatment could<br />

be explained by the enhanced foliar area of these plants (35.9<br />

and 25.3% higher than that of plants in the 3 and 18 mmol L −1 N<br />

treatments respectively) when fructification started.<br />

Fruits of mycorrhizal plants had a lower fructose concentration<br />

than fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants, indicating that mycorrhization<br />

reduced the accumulation of this carbon compound in the<br />

fruits. This could be explained by the fact that AMF act as carbon<br />

sinks (4–20% of the total carbon fixed by the plant). 49<br />

Around 4% of the dry matter of plants comprises mineral<br />

elements, which, owing to their role in enzymatic reactions<br />

essential for fruit development and its cold conservation, are<br />

importantforfruitquality. 50 Inthisstudyweobservedthatdifferent<br />

N levels modified the concentrations of some minerals in the fruits.<br />

Fruits of plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 N showed higher K, Mg,<br />

Fe and Zn levels than fruits of plants treated with 18 mmol L −1<br />

N. These results suggest that the roots of plants fertilised with<br />

3 mmol L −1 N took up higher amounts of these minerals.<br />

It has been shown previously that a low availability of N in the<br />

soil affects root growth. Tolley-Henry and Raper 51 suggested that<br />

under conditions of low N availability the roots have priority to<br />

N compared with other plant organs and therefore root growth<br />

is promoted. Rufty et al. 52 demonstrated that a low availability of<br />

N in the soil increases the amount of photosynthates addressed<br />

to the roots, thus being available for enhanced root growth. In<br />

our experiment, root dry weight and volume were also measured<br />

(data not shown). The root dry weight of plants fertilised with 3<br />

and 18 mmol L −1 N was 2.0 and 1.7 g per plant respectively, while<br />

the root volume of these plants was 22.0 and 14.8 cm 3 per plant<br />

respectively. These data suggest that a higher soil volume was<br />

explored by plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 N compared with<br />

plants treated with 18 mmol L −1 N, which could explain the higher<br />

K, Mg, Fe and Zn levels in fruits of plants of the 3 mmol L −1 N<br />

treatment.<br />

To date, no adequate data are available on the effect<br />

of mycorrhization on macro- and micronutrients in fruits.<br />

In our experiment, mycorrhization significantly modified the<br />

concentrations of K, Cu and Mn, with fruits of mycorrhizal plants<br />

having higher K and Cu levels and a lower Mn level. Although<br />

mycorrhizal root colonisation frequently increases macro- and<br />

micronutrient accumulation in the leaves and stalks of plants, 53,54<br />

Liu et al. 55 found lower Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe concentrations in the<br />

shoots of mycorrhizal corn plants. The inconsistent results on<br />

nutrient acquisition by mycorrhizal plants have been attributed to<br />

changes in the rhizosphere due to increased N levels in the soil,<br />

which affect mycorrhizal development. 56<br />

Fruits of mycorrhizal plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 Nhad<br />

higher concentrations of those minerals than fruits of mycorrhizal<br />

plants treated with 18 mmol L −1 N. Similar results of lower, equal<br />

or higher acquisition of macro- and/or micronutrients dependent<br />

on the level of mineral fertilisation have been reported in lettuce<br />

inoculated with Glomus mosseae. 4 The lack of a beneficial effect of<br />

mycorrhization in terms of mineral acquisition in our 18 mmol L −1<br />

N treatment could be attributed to a negative effect of this N<br />

concentration on the extraradical mycelium development of the<br />

AMF. The suppressive effect of high N levels on the formation<br />

of extraradical mycelium has been described previously and has<br />

been linked with reduced nutrient acquisition in mycorrhizal<br />

plants. 57 Fruits of mycorrhizal plants fertilised with 6 mmol L −1<br />

N had significantly higher Cu and Zn concentrations than fruits<br />

of non-mycorrhizal plants fertilised with the same N level. This<br />

indicates a positive effect of mycorrhization and N treatment on<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1779


1780<br />

the acquisition of Cu and Zn by the roots and their translocation<br />

to the fruits.<br />

Our results on the effect of N fertilisation on phenolic<br />

compounds in strawberry fruits show that from the 3 mmol L −1<br />

N treatment to the 18 mmol L −1 N treatment the concentrations<br />

of ellagic acid, quercetin and kaempferol decreased while the<br />

concentrations of total phenols, cyanidin-3-glucoside and gallic<br />

acid increased.<br />

A decrease in quercetin and kaempferol concentrations at high<br />

N levels has been reported in tomato fruits, 58 while an increase<br />

in ellagic acid concentration at low N levels has been found in<br />

strawberry fruits. 59 In addition, Keller and Hrazdina 60 reported that<br />

the N concentration in the soil had different effects on the total<br />

phenol concentration in grapes. The application of high N levels<br />

led to low accumulation of flavonols, whereas the proportion of<br />

anthocyanins was similar to that at low N levels. Our results could<br />

be explained by the effect that N has on the biosynthetic pathways<br />

of phenolic compounds. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is the<br />

principal enzyme of the phenylpropanoid pathway. 61 This enzyme<br />

catalyses the transformation of the amino acid L-phenylalanine by<br />

deamination to trans-cinnamic acid, which is the first product<br />

necessary for the synthesis of phenolic compounds. Interestingly,<br />

it has been reported that at low N levels the enzymatic activity of<br />

PAL is increased, liberating N for the amino acid metabolism, and<br />

whereas the carbon products are diverted via 4-coumaroyl-CoA<br />

into the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. 62 In our study, this could<br />

be an explanation for the increase in concentrations of some<br />

flavonoids (cyanidin-3-glucoside, kaempferol and quercetin) in<br />

fruits of plants fertilised with 3 mmol L −1 N.<br />

Mycorrhization modified the levels of most phenolic compounds.<br />

The cyanidin-3-glucoside, p-coumaric acid, quercetin and<br />

kaempferol concentrations were higher and the gallic acid, ferulic<br />

acid and ellagic acid concentrations were lower in fruits of<br />

mycorrhizal plants than in fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants. To our<br />

knowledge, there are no data on the effect of AMF on phenolic<br />

compound accumulation in fruits. However, there are reports on<br />

changes in the levels of p-coumaric acid and ferulic acid in the roots<br />

of mycorrhizal onion plants, 63 changes in the levels of biochanin A,<br />

formononetin, genistein and daidzein in the roots of mycorrhizal<br />

alfalfa (M. sativa L.) 19–21 and barrel medic (M. truncatula) 22 and<br />

changes in the level of glyceoline in mycorrhizal soybean (G. max<br />

L.). 24 Most recently, it has been shown that through mycorrhization<br />

the levels of phenols can also be altered in plant shoots. 23 Our<br />

results extend these observations, showing that mycorrhization<br />

can induce changes in phenolic compound levels even in fruits.<br />

An increase in applied N modified the concentrations of<br />

some phenolic compounds between fruits of mycorrhizal and<br />

non-mycorrhizal plants. Differences were determined in fruits<br />

of plants fertilised with 6 mmol L −1 N. These results indicate<br />

that N fertilisation modifies the response of the strawberry<br />

plant to the AMF G. intraradices. This could be attributed to<br />

changes in the rhizosphere due to N levels in the soil, which<br />

affect mycorrhizal development 56 and thus the acquisition of<br />

other nutrients necessary for the production of phenols. To our<br />

knowledge, we have provided the first evidence that, depending<br />

on the N level applied, the accumulation of phenolic compounds<br />

is altered in fruits of mycorrhizal strawberry plants.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Mycorrhization did not modify the weight, diameter or length<br />

of strawberry fruits but had a negative effect on most colour<br />

www.soci.org V Castellanos-Morales et al.<br />

parameters. Moreover, fruits of mycorrhizal plants had higher K<br />

and Cu concentrations and showed greater accumulation of most<br />

phenolic compounds. The results indicate that the 3 mmol L −1<br />

N treatment had a positive effect on the accumulation of some<br />

minerals in strawberry fruits, and fruits of mycorrhizal plants had<br />

significantlyhigherphenoliccompound,CuandZnconcentrations<br />

than fruits of non-mycorrhizal plants when they were treated with<br />

6 mmol L −1 N. In recent years, much interest has focused on the<br />

intake of phenolic compounds from the human diet and the<br />

health benefits due to their antioxidant nature. It is therefore of<br />

interest to produce crops rich in flavonols without the need for<br />

genetic modification. Although previous studies have identified<br />

a link between nutrient deficiency and phenolic compound<br />

accumulation in plant tissue, the present study provides evidence<br />

that mycorrhization and N application in strawberry plants can be<br />

one strategy for increasing phenolic compound concentrations in<br />

the fruits. In addition, up-regulation of the flavonoid biosynthetic<br />

pathway in strawberry fruits may afford protection against<br />

pathogen attack or light-induced damage. Further studies are<br />

required to test this theory.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors are grateful to ‘Fondos Mixtos CONACyT – Gobierno<br />

del Estado de Michoacán’, Mexico for support of project 12268<br />

‘Optimization of nitrogen and water in the strawberry crop<br />

(Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) by the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal<br />

fungi’ and to CONACYT for provision of a PhD grant to Vilma<br />

Castellanos. Moreover, we thank Dr Philippe Lobit, Sandra and<br />

Silvia Velasco López, Flor Lorena Reyes Sánchez and Alejandrino<br />

López Hernández from UMSNH, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico and<br />

Veronica Schober, Monika Marek and Karin Korntheuer from the<br />

Chemistry Laboratory of the Federal College and <strong>Research</strong> Institute<br />

for Viticulture and Pomology, Klosterneuburg, Austria for their<br />

support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 SmithSEandReadDJ,Mycorrhizas Symbiosis. Academic Press, London<br />

(1997).<br />

2 Bago B, Vierheilig H, PichéY and Azcón-Aguilar C, Nitrate depletion<br />

and pH changes induced by the extraradical mycelium of the<br />

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New Phytol<br />

133:273–280 (1996).<br />

3 Govindarajulu M, Pfeffer PE, Jin H, Abubaker J, Douds DD, Allen JW,<br />

et al, Nitrogen transfer in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.<br />

Nature 1038:1–5 (2005).<br />

4 Azcón R, Ambrosano E and Charest C, Nutrient acquisition in<br />

mycorrhizal lettuce plants under different phosphorus and nitrogen<br />

concentration. Plant Sci 165:1137–1145 (2003).<br />

5 Johansen A, Jakobsen I and Jensen ES, Hyphal transport by a vesiculararbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungus of N applied to the soil as ammonium<br />

or nitrate. Biol Fertil Soils 16:66–70 (1993).<br />

6 Corkidi L, Rowland DL, Jonson NC and Allen EJ, Nitrogen fertilization<br />

alters the functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizas at two semiarid<br />

grasslands. Plant Soil 240:299–310 (2002).<br />

7 HopkinsW, Introduction to Plant Physiology. Wiley, Chichester<br />

(1995).<br />

8 Yoshida Y, Goto T, Hirai M and Masuda M, Anthocyanin accumulation<br />

in strawberry fruits as affected by nitrogen nutrition. Acta Hort<br />

567:357–360 (2002).<br />

9 May G and Pritts M, Strawberry nutrition. Adv Strawberry Prod 9:10–23<br />

(1990).<br />

10 Miner GS, Poling EB, Caroll DE, Nelson LA and Campbell CR, Influence<br />

of all nitrogen and spring nitrogen–potassium applications on<br />

yield and fruit quality of ‘Chandler’ strawberry. JAmSocHortSci<br />

122:290–295 (1997).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782


Effects of AMF and N level on quality of strawberry fruits www.soci.org<br />

11 Wang SY, Bunce JA and Maasl JL, Elevated carbon dioxide increases<br />

concentrations of antioxidant compounds in field grown<br />

strawberries. J Agric Food Chem 51:4315–4320 (2003).<br />

12 Kallio H, Hakala M, Pelkkikangas A and Lapvetelainen A, Sugars and<br />

acids of strawberry varieties. Eur Food Res Technol 212:81–85<br />

(2000).<br />

13 Kahkonen MP, Hopia AI and Heinonen M, Berry phenolics and<br />

their antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 49:4076–4082<br />

(2001).<br />

14 Khaosaad T, Vierheilig H, Nell N, Zitterl-Eglseer K and Novak J,<br />

Arbuscular mycorrhiza alter the concentration of essential oils<br />

in oregano (Origanum sp., Lamiaceae). Mycorrhiza 16:443–446<br />

(2006).<br />

15 Copetta A, Lingua G and Berta G, Effects of three AM fungi on<br />

growth, distribution of glandular hairs, and essential oil production<br />

in Ocimum basilicum L. var. Genovese. Mycorrhiza 16:485–494<br />

(2006).<br />

16 Toussaint JP, Kraml M, Nell M, Smith SE, Smith FA, Steinkellner S, et al,<br />

The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae confers a<br />

bioprotective effect against Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. basilici in<br />

basil, which is not mediated by increases in phytochemicals. Plant<br />

Pathol 57:1109–1116 (2008).<br />

17 Kapoor R, Giri B and Mukerji KG, Effect of the vesicular arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal (VAM) fungus Glomus fasciculatum on the essential oil<br />

yield related characters and nutrient acquisition in the crops of<br />

different cultivars of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) underfield<br />

conditions. Bioresour Technol 81:77–79 (2002).<br />

18 Kapoor R, Giri B and Mukerji KG, Mycorrhization of coriander<br />

(Coriandrum sativum L.) to enhance the concentration and quality<br />

of essential oil. J Sci Food Agric 82:339–342 (2002).<br />

19 Volpin H, Elkind Y, Okon Y and Kapulnik Y, A vesicular arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradix induces a defense response<br />

in alfalfa roots. Plant Physiol 104:683–689 (1994).<br />

20 Larose G, Chenevert R, Moutoglis P, Gagne S, Piché Y and Vierheilig H,<br />

Flavonoid levels in roots of Medicago sativa are modulated by the<br />

developmental stage of the symbiosis and the root colonizing<br />

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. J Plant Physiol 159:1329–1339<br />

(2002).<br />

21 Catford JG,Staehelin C,Larose G,Piché YandVierheilig H,Systemically<br />

suppressed isoflavonoids and their stimulating effects on<br />

nodulation and mycorrhization in alfalfa split-root systems. Plant<br />

Soil 285:257–266 (2006).<br />

22 Harrison M and Dixon RA, Isoflavonoid accumulation and expression<br />

of defense gene transcripts during the establishment of vesiculararbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal associations in roots of Medicago truncatula.<br />

Mol Plant Microbe Interact 6:643–654 (1993).<br />

23 Khaosaad T, Krenn L, Medjakovic S, Ranner A, Lössl A, Nell M, et al,<br />

Effect of mycorrhization on the isoflavone concentration and the<br />

phytoestrogen activity of red clover. J Plant Physiol 165:1161–1167<br />

(2008).<br />

24 Morandi D, Occurrence of phytoalexins and phenolic compounds on<br />

endomycorrhizal interactions, and their potential role in biological<br />

control. Plant Soil 185:241–251 (1996).<br />

25 Niemi M and Vestberg M, Inoculation of commercially grown<br />

strawberry with VA mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 144:133–142<br />

(1992).<br />

26 Alarcón A, Ferrera-Cerrato R, González-Chavez MC and Villegas-<br />

Monter A, Hongos micorricicos arbusculares en la dinámica de<br />

aparición de estolones y nutrición de plantas de fresa Cv. Obtenidas<br />

por cultivo in vitro. Terra 18:211–218 (2000).<br />

27 Borkowska B, Growth and photosynthetic activity of micropropagated<br />

strawberry plants inoculated with endomycorrhizal fungi (AMF)<br />

and growing under drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant 24:365–370<br />

(2002).<br />

28 Vestberg M, Konen S, Neuvonen EL and Uosukainen M, Mycorrhizal<br />

inoculation of micropropagated strawberry – case studies on<br />

mineral soil and a mined peat bog. Acta Hort 530:297–304<br />

(2000).<br />

29 Vierheilig H, Coughlan AP, Wyss U and Piché Y, Ink and vinegar, a<br />

simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl<br />

Environ Microbiol 12:5004–5007 (1998).<br />

30 An ZQ and Hendrix JW, Determining viability of endogonaceous<br />

spores with a vital stain. Mycologia 80:259–261 (1988).<br />

31 Giovannetti MandMosse B,Anevaluationoftechniquesformeasuring<br />

vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection on roots. New Phytol<br />

84:489–500 (1980).<br />

32 Gomez L, Rubio E and Augé M, A new procedure for extraction and<br />

measurement of soluble sugars in ligneous plants. J Sci Food Agric<br />

82:360–369 (2002).<br />

33 Gomez L, Bancel D, Rubio E and Varcambre G, The microplate reader:<br />

an efficient tool for the separate enzymatic analysis of sugars<br />

in plant tissues – validation of a micro-method. J Sci Food Agric<br />

87:1893–1905 (2007).<br />

34 Markakis P, Anthocyanins as Food Colors. Academic Press, New York,<br />

NY (1982).<br />

35 Folin C and Ciocalteu V, Tyrosine and tryptophan determination in<br />

proteins. JBiolChem73:627–650 (1927).<br />

36 Sanisavljevic M, Sreckovic M and Miltrovic M, Field performance of<br />

some foreign strawberry cultivars grown in Yugoslavia. Acta Hort<br />

439:291–296 (1997).<br />

37 Tsavnova-Savova S and Ribarova F, Free and conjugated myricetin,<br />

quercetin and kaempferol in Bulgarian red wines. J Food Compos<br />

Anal 15:639–645 (2002).<br />

38 Vrhovˇsek U, Wendelin S and Eder R, Quantitative Bestimmung von<br />

Hydroxyzimtsäurederivaten (Hydroxycinnamaten) in Weißweinen<br />

mittels HPLC. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 47:164–172<br />

(1997).<br />

39 Crisosto CH, Johnson RS and DeJong T, Orchard factors affecting<br />

postharvest stone fruit quality. HortScience 32:820–823<br />

(1997).<br />

40 Wang S and Camp M, Temperatures after bloom affect plant<br />

growth and fruit quality of strawberry. Sci Hort 85:183–199<br />

(2000).<br />

41 Sacks E and Shaw D, Color change in fresh strawberry fruit of seven<br />

genotypes stored at 0 ◦ C. HortScience 28:209–210 (1993).<br />

42 Pelayo-Saldívar C, Ebeler ES and Kader AA, Cultivar and harvest<br />

date effects on flavor and other quality attributes of California<br />

strawberries. J Food Qual 28:78–97 (2005).<br />

43 Mena-Violante HG, Ocampo-Jimenez O, Dendooven L, Martínez-<br />

Soto G, González-Castañeda J, Davies Jr FT, et al, Arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungi enhance fruit growth and quality of chile ancho<br />

(Capsicum annuum L. cv San Luis) plants exposed to drought.<br />

Mycorrhiza 16:261–267 (2006).<br />

44 Gil MI,Holcroft DM and Kader AA,Changes in strawberry anthocyanins<br />

and other polyphenols in response to carbon dioxide treatments.<br />

J Agric Food Chem 45:1662–1667 (1997).<br />

45 Pérez A, OlíasR,EspadaJ,Olías J and Sanz C, Rapid determination of<br />

sugars, nonvolatile acids, and ascorbic acid in strawberry and other<br />

fruits. J Agric Food Chem 45:3545–3549 (1997).<br />

46 Cordenunsi B, Oliveira J, Genovesse M and Lajolo F, Influence of<br />

cultivar on quality parameters and chemical composition of<br />

strawberry fruits grown in Brazil. J Agric Food Chem 50:2581–2586<br />

(2002).<br />

47 Perkins-Veazie P and Collins JK, Strawberry fruit quality and its<br />

maintenance in postharvest environments. Adv Strawberry Res<br />

14:1–8 (1995).<br />

48 Mitcham B,Quality assurance forstrawberries: a case study. Perishables<br />

Handling Newslett 85:6–8 (1996).<br />

49 Douds DD, Pffefer PE and Shachar-Hill Y, Carbon partitioning, cost and<br />

metabolism of arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function, in<br />

Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function, ed. by Kapulnick Y<br />

and Douds DDJ. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 107–129<br />

(2000).<br />

50 Fallahi E, Conway W, Hickey K and Sams C, The role of calcium and<br />

nitrogen in postharvest quality and disease resistance of apples.<br />

HortScience 32:831–835 (1997).<br />

51 Tolley-Henry L and Raper Jr CD, Expansion and photosynthetic rate<br />

of leaves of soybean plants during onset of and recovery from<br />

nitrogen stress. Bot Gaz 147:400–406 (1986).<br />

52 Rufty Jr TW, Huber SC and Volk RJ, Alterations in leaf carbohydrate<br />

metabolism in response to nitrogen stress. Plant Physiol 88:725–730<br />

(1988).<br />

53 Kaya C, Higgs D, Kirnak H and Tas I, Mycorrhizal colonization improves<br />

fruit yield and water use efficiency in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus<br />

Thunb.) grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions.<br />

Plant Soil 253:287–292 (2003).<br />

54 Ghazi N, Al-Karaki-Hammand R and Rusan M, Response of two tomato<br />

cultivars differing in salt tolerance to inoculation with mycorrhizal<br />

fungi under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 11:43–47 (2001).<br />

55 Liu A, Hamel C, Hamilton RI, Ma BL and Smith DL, Acquisition of Cu,<br />

Zn, Mn and Fe by mycorrhizal maize (Zea mays L.) grown in<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1781


1782<br />

soil at different P and micronutrient levels. Mycorrhiza 9:331–336<br />

(2000).<br />

56 Clarke RB and Zeto SK, Mineral acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal<br />

plants. JPlantNutr23:867–902 (2000).<br />

57 Gryndler M, Hrselova H, Vosatka M, Votruba J and Klir J, Organic<br />

fertilization changes the response of mycelium of arbuscular<br />

mycorrhizal fungi and their sporulation to mineral NPK supply.<br />

Folia Microbiol 46:540–542 (2001).<br />

58 Stewart AJ, Chapman W, Jenkins GI, Graham I, Martin T and Crozier A,<br />

The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency on flavonol<br />

accumulation in plant tissues. Plant Cell Environ 24:1189–1197<br />

(2001).<br />

59 Anttonen MJ, Hoppuls KI, Nestby MJ and Karjalainen RO, Influence<br />

of fertilization, mulch color, early forcing, fruit order, planning<br />

date, shading, growing environment, and genotype on the<br />

concentrations of selected phenolics in strawberry (Fragaria ×<br />

ananassa Duch.) fruits. J Agric Food Chem 54:2614–2620 (2006).<br />

www.soci.org V Castellanos-Morales et al.<br />

60 Keller M and Hrazdina G, Interaction on nitrogen availability during<br />

bloom and light intensity during variation. II. Effects on anthocyanin<br />

and phenolic development during grape ripening. Am J Enol Vitic<br />

49:341–349 (1998).<br />

61 Hao Z, Charles DJ, Yu L and Simon JE, Purification and characterization<br />

of a phenylalanine ammonia-lyase from Ocimum basilicum.<br />

Phytochemistry 43:735–739 (1996).<br />

62 Margna U, Control at the level of substrate supply – an alternative<br />

in the regulation of phenylpropanoid accumulation in plant cells.<br />

Phytochemistry 16:419–426 (1977).<br />

63 Grandmaison J, Olah GM, Van Calsteren MR and Furlan V,<br />

Characterization and localization of plant phenolics likely involved<br />

in the pathogen resistance expressed by endomycorrhizal roots.<br />

Mycorrhiza 3:155–164 (1993).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1774–1782


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 28 September 2009 Revised: 6 April 2010 Accepted: 9 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 25 May 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4012<br />

Effect of different light transmittance paper<br />

bags on fruit quality and antioxidant capacity<br />

in loquat<br />

Hong-xia Xu, Jun-wei Chen ∗ and Ming Xie<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Bagging has been widely used to improve the commercial value of fruit. The purpose of this study was to<br />

evaluate the effects of different light transmittance paper bags on the quality and antioxidant capacity of loquat fruit. Two<br />

loquat cultivars, Baiyu and Ninghaibai (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.), were used for materials. One-layered white paper bags<br />

(OWPB) with ∼50% light transmittance and two-layered paper bags with a black inner layer and a grey outer layer (TGDPB)<br />

with ∼0% light transmittance were used as treatments and unbagged fruits were used as the control (CK) in this experiment.<br />

Fruit quality was determined by physicochemical characteristics, the quantity of sugar, total phenolic, flavonoid, carotenoid<br />

and vitamin C. The antioxidant capacities of the methanol extracted from the pulp were tested using three different assays.<br />

RESULTS: The results showed that bagging decreased the weight of fruit but promoted the appearance of loquat fruits. The<br />

total sugar content in the fruit bagged with OWPB was higher than in controls and in fruit bagged with TGDPB. The total<br />

phenolic and flavonoid contents were decreased by both bagging treatments, with the lowest occurring in the fruit bagged<br />

with TGDPB. Bagging also decreased the total antioxidant capacity of the fruit pulp, which was again lower in TGDPB-treated<br />

fruits than in those bagged using OWPB. Correlation analysis showed a linear relationship between total antioxidant capacity<br />

and the content of total phenolic and flavonoid.<br />

CONCLUSION: The results showed that different light transmittance bags had different effects on fruit quality and antioxidant<br />

capacity. In particular, bags with low light transmittance (TGDPB) decreased the inner quality and total antioxidant capacity of<br />

loquat fruit. All results indicated that bagging with OWPB was more suitable for maintaining the quality of the loquat fruit than<br />

bagging with TGDPB.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: antioxidant capacity; bagging; Eriobotrya japonica Lindl; flavonoid content; loquat; total phenolic content<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) is widely cultivated in subtropical<br />

regions of Asia and other continents. Ripe loquat fruits are<br />

spherical or oval in shape, orange/yellow or white in colour and<br />

have a soft and juicy flesh. During their growth and maturation,<br />

they are susceptible to insect pests, birds, diseases and mechanical<br />

damage, which reduce their commercial value. Bagging, a physical<br />

protection technique commonly applied to many fruits, not<br />

only improves fruit visual quality, 1–4 by promoting fruit coloration<br />

and reducing the incidences of fruit cracking and russet, but can<br />

also change the microenvironment of fruit development, which<br />

has multiple effects on the inner quality of fruits. Sugars and organic<br />

acids are the major determinants of fruit taste and flavour.<br />

However, varied results have been obtained from experiments on<br />

the effects of bagging on the sugar and organic acid contents of<br />

fruits. Chundawat et al. 5 showed that bagging generally reduces<br />

the sugar content of fruit, whereas Hussein et al. 6 reported that<br />

bagging significantly increased the total sugar content. Huang<br />

et al. 7 reported that bagging treatments did not affect the total<br />

soluble sugar content, but decreased the organic acid contents of<br />

fruit. Kim et al. 8 showed that titratable acids tended to increase<br />

after bagging with yellow paper of low light transmittance.<br />

In addition to sugars and organic acids, loquat fruits also contain<br />

diverse nutrient and non-nutrient molecules, such as phenolics<br />

(especially the flavonoids), vitamin C, and β-carotene, many of<br />

which have antioxidant properties. These compounds exert a<br />

range of biological effects including antibacterial, antiviral, antiinflammatory,<br />

antithrombotic and vasodilatory actions. 9,10 They<br />

also have pronounced antioxidant and free-radical-scavenging<br />

activities. 11–13 However, most of the studies on bagging fruit<br />

focus on the appearance and general qualities of the fruit and<br />

studies of the effects of bagging on antioxidant compounds and<br />

antioxidant capacity of fruits are rare. Therefore, this study was<br />

carried out to examine the effect of different light transmittance<br />

paper bags on fruit quality and antioxidant capacity in two loquat<br />

cultivars.<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Jun-wei Chen, Institute of Horticulture, Zhejiang Academy<br />

of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310021, China.<br />

E-mail: chenjunwe@tom.com<br />

InstituteofHorticulture,ZhejiangAcademy ofAgricultural Sciences,Hangzhou,<br />

Zhejiang, 310021, China<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783–1788 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1783


1784<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Standards and chemicals<br />

ABTS [2,2-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzthiozoline-6-sulfonic acid)],<br />

DPPH (the 1,1-diphenyl-2- picrylhydrazyl radical), TPTZ<br />

[2,4,6-tri(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine], Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic<br />

acid), DPIP (phenolindo-<br />

2,6- dichlorophenol), rutin, β-carotene, HPLC-grade sucrose,<br />

glucose, fructose and sorbitol were all purchased from Sigma-<br />

Aldrich (Shanghai, China). All reagents were of analytical grade<br />

unless indicated otherwise.<br />

Plant material<br />

Two loquat cultivars, Baiyu and Ninghaibai (Eriobotrya japonica<br />

Lindl.),growninacommercialorchardinQingpuDistrict,Shanghai,<br />

China were used to test the bagging treatment. Approximately<br />

100 fruitlets that were similar in appearance and size and which<br />

received sunlight uniformly were randomly selected for each<br />

bagging treatment. Approximately 100 unbagged fruitlets that<br />

were also similar in appearance and size were tagged as controls<br />

(CK). Bagging treatments were conducted after fruit thinning in<br />

early April. At maturity, 50 fruits of each treatment were used for<br />

fruit quality and antioxidant capacity analyses. Fruit maturity and<br />

ripeness were assessed based on fruit firmness and skin colour.<br />

Two types of bag were used in this study: (1) 25 cm × 36 cm onelayered<br />

white paper bags (OWPB) with ∼50% light transmittance;<br />

(2) 25 cm × 36 cm two-layered paper bags with a black inner layer<br />

and a grey outer layer (TGDPB) with ∼0% light transmittance. All<br />

bags were coated with wax and supplied by Shangyu Jiali Paper<br />

Bag Product Co., Ltd. (Ningbo, China).<br />

Physicochemical characteristics analyses<br />

The fruit mass of 30 loquats from each bagging treatment was<br />

measured by using an electronic balance (0–210 g ± 0.001 g;<br />

model C-600-SX; Cobos, Barcelona, Spain). These fruits were<br />

randomly divided into five groups (replicates) with six fruits in each<br />

group. The fruits were then manually peeled, cut into small pieces<br />

and juiced together. The soluble solids concentration (SSC) was<br />

measured in the filtered juice by using a hand-held refractometer<br />

(Atago, Tokyo, Japan) and calibrated with distilled water. The<br />

juice was also analysed for titratable acidity (TA) by titration<br />

with 0.01 mol L −1 NaOH, using phenolphthalein as an indicator.<br />

Twenty fruits of each treatment were selected for surface colour<br />

determination using a chromameter (ADCI-60-C, Beijing, China)<br />

calibrated with a manufacturer-supplied white calibration plate.<br />

Results were expressed as lightness (L ∗ ), redness (a ∗ ), yellowness<br />

(b ∗ ) and hue angle (hab = tan −1 [(b ∗ )(a ∗ ) −1 ]). The colour reading<br />

was taken fourth atthe equatorial region of each fruitand averaged<br />

to give a value for each fruit. After surface colour determination,<br />

the fruits were manually peeled, cut into small pieces and the<br />

composite fruit samples ranging from 2 to 10 g were weighed and<br />

frozen in liquid nitrogen, then stored at −80 ◦ C until analysis.<br />

Determination of sugar content<br />

The quantity and types of sugar were determined as described<br />

by Chen et al. 14 Soluble sugars were extracted by grinding 5 g<br />

frozen fruit in five volumes (w/v) of methanol : chloroform : water<br />

as 12 : 5:3 (v/v). Extracts were centrifuged at 5000×g for 5 min. The<br />

extraction was performed three times. Water and chloroform were<br />

then added to bring the final methanol : chloroform : water ratio<br />

to 10 : 6:5 and the chloroform layer was removed. The remaining<br />

aqueous–alcohol phase was adjusted to pH 7.0 using 0.1 mol L −1<br />

www.soci.org H-X Xu, J-W Chen, M Xie<br />

NaOH, then dried in a vacuum and redissolved with distilled<br />

water. The sugar in water solution was analysed by using HPLC<br />

(Waters 1525; Waters, Milford, Massachusetts, USA). The column<br />

temperature was 90 ◦ C and 80% acetonitrile was used as an elution<br />

at a flow rate of 1 mL min −1 . Fructose, glucose, sucrose and sorbitol<br />

were identified and quantified by comparing the retention and<br />

integrated peak areas of external standards.<br />

Total carotenoid content analysis<br />

The total carotenoid content was determined as described by<br />

Reyes et al. 15 Carotenoids were extracted from 2 g frozen fruit by<br />

homogenising with 25 mL of acetone : ethanol (1 : 1) containing<br />

200 mg L −1 butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). The homogenate<br />

was filtered through a Whatman no. 4 filter, washed with the solvent<br />

(∼60 mL) and diluted to 100 mL using the extraction solvent.<br />

Extracts were transferred to a plastic container to which 50 mL<br />

hexane was added. The container was then shaken and allowed<br />

to stand for 15 min after which 25 mL of nanopure water was<br />

added. The container was shaken again and the contents were allowed<br />

to separate for 30 min. The spectrophotometer was blanked<br />

with hexane and absorbance of the samples in 1-cm quartz cuvettes<br />

was measured at 470 nm. Carotenoid was quantified as<br />

β-carotene using a standard curve for this compound<br />

(1–4 µgmL −1 ). Results were expressed as µg β-carotene equivalent<br />

g −1 fresh weight.<br />

Vitamin C content analysis<br />

The vitamin C content of the fruit extracts was determined<br />

by the 2,6-dichloroindophenol titrimetric method. 16 Briefly, the<br />

samples were mixed with 40 mL of buffer (1 g L −1 oxalic acid plus<br />

4gL −1 anhydrous sodium acetate) and were titrated against<br />

the dye solution containing 295 mg L −1 DPIP (phenolindo-<br />

2,6-dichlorophenol) and 100 mg L −1 sodium bicarbonate. The<br />

standard curve was generated with concentrations of 0.2, 0.4,<br />

0.6, 0.8 and 1 mg of standard L-ascorbic acid (AnalaR; BDH,<br />

Buffalo, New York, USA). The ascorbic acid content in the samples<br />

was determined from the standard curve and the results were<br />

expressed as µg ascorbic acid equivalent g −1 fresh weight.<br />

Extracts for phenolic and antioxidant capacity measurement<br />

To analyse the total phenolic and antioxidant activity, fruit extracts<br />

in methanol were prepared using the method of Swain and<br />

Hillis, 17 with some modifications. A 10 g sample of fruit were<br />

homogenised in 25 mL absolute methanol using a Waring blender.<br />

The homogenates were kept at 4 ◦ C for 12 h and then centrifuged<br />

at 15 000 × g for 20 min. The supernatants were collected, and<br />

extraction of the residue was repeated using the same conditions.<br />

The two supernatants of methanol were combined and divided<br />

into two equal aliquots and then stored at −20 ◦ C until analysis.<br />

The first supernatant was used for the quantitative analysis of<br />

phenolic compounds and the second was used to determine the<br />

antioxidant activity.<br />

Total phenolic content analysis<br />

The Folin–Ciocalteu reagent assay 18 was used to determine the<br />

total phenolic content. A 0.1 mL sample aliquot was mixed with<br />

5mL of 0.2molL −1 Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. The solution was<br />

allowed to stand at 25 ◦ C for 5min before adding 4mL of 15%<br />

(w/v) sodium carbonate solution in distilled water. The absorbance<br />

at765 nm was read after the initial mixing and then for up to 90 min<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783–1788


Effect of bagging on loquat fruit quality and antioxidant capacity www.soci.org<br />

until it reached a plateau. Gallic acid was used as a standard for<br />

the calibration curve. Results were expressed as µg gallic acid<br />

equivalent g −1 fresh weight.<br />

Total flavonoid content analysis<br />

The flavonoid content was measured using a colorimetric assay<br />

developed byJia et al. 19 Plantextract(2.0 mL)or standard solutions<br />

of rutin (Sigma) were added to a 10 mL volumetric flask. Distilled<br />

water was added to make a volume of 5 mL. At zero time, 0.3 mL<br />

of 5% w/v NaNO2 was added to the flask. After 5 min, 0.6 mL of<br />

10% w/v AlCl3 was added and after 6 min, 2 mL of 1 mol L −1 NaOH<br />

was added to the flask, followed by 2.1 mL distilled water. The<br />

absorbance was read at 510 nm against the blank (water) and the<br />

flavonoid content was expressed as µg rutin equivalent g −1 fresh<br />

weight.<br />

Antioxidant capacity determinations<br />

Free radical scavenging activity on DPPH<br />

The free radical scavenging activity of the extracts, based on<br />

the scavenging activity of the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl<br />

(DPPH) free radical, was determined by the method described by<br />

Braca et al. 20 Plant extract (0.1 mL) was added to 3 mL of a 0.004%<br />

MeOH solution of DPPH. Absorbance at 517 nm was determined<br />

after 30 min, and the percentage inhibition activity was calculated<br />

from [(A0 − A1)/A0] × 100, where A0 is the absorbance of the<br />

control, and A1 is the absorbance of the extract/standard. Results<br />

were expressed as µmol Trolox equivalent g −1 fresh weight.<br />

Antioxidant activity using the ABTS assay<br />

TheABTS • scavengingabilityofextractswasdeterminedaccording<br />

to the method described by Re et al. 21 ABTS • was generated by<br />

reacting an ABTS aqueous solution (7 mmol L −1 )withK2S2O8<br />

(2.45 mmol L −1 , final concentration) in the dark for 16 h and<br />

adjusting the absorbance at 734 nm to 0.700 with ethanol. A<br />

0.2 mL aliquot of appropriate dilution of the extract was added<br />

to 2.0 mL ABTS • solution and the absorbance was measured<br />

at 734 nm after 15 min. Results were expressed as µmol Trolox<br />

equivalent g −1 fresh weight.<br />

Table 1. Effects of bagging on the physicochemical characteristics of loquat fruit<br />

Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay<br />

The FRAP assay was used as described by Benzie and Strain 22<br />

with some modifications. The stock solutions included 300 mmol<br />

acetate buffer (3.1 g C2H3NaO2·3H2Oand16mLC2H4O2), pH 3.6;<br />

10 mmol TPTZ (2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine) solution in 40 mmol HCl,<br />

and 20 mmol FeCl3·6H2O solution. The fresh working solution was<br />

prepared by mixing 25 mL acetate buffer, 2.5 mL TPTZ solution,<br />

and 2.5 mL FeCl3·6H2O solution and then warmed at 37 ◦ Cbefore<br />

use 150 µL of fruit extracts or methanol (for the reagent blank) was<br />

reacted with 2850 µLoftheFRAPsolutionat37 ◦ Cfor30mininthe<br />

dark (in a water bath). Readings of the coloured product (ferrous<br />

tripyridyltriazine complex) were then taken at 593 nm. Results<br />

were expressed as µmol Trolox equivalent g −1 fresh weight.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The significance of the results and statistical differences were<br />

analysed using SYSTAT version 10.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).<br />

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the data was performed to<br />

compare mean values for each variable under different cultivars.<br />

Theleastsignificantdifferencetest(LSD)wasusedtodeterminethe<br />

differences between means at a 5% significance level. Correlation<br />

coefficients of DPPH, TEAC and FRAP with respect to total phenolic,<br />

total flavonoid, total carotenoid and vitamin C contents were<br />

evaluated.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The effects of bagging on the physicochemical characteristics<br />

of loquat fruit<br />

Bagging is already known to affect the size and weight of<br />

pomegranate, 6,23 apple 24 and banana. 25 In this study, all bagging<br />

treatments decreased the weight of loquat fruit compared with<br />

controls (Table 1). And, fruits treated with TGDPB were smaller than<br />

that treated with OWPB. The total soluble solids remained constant<br />

and titratable acid decreased in Baiyu fruits treated with OWPB,<br />

whereas total soluble solid significantly decreased and titratable<br />

acid markedly increased in Baiyu fruits treated with TGDPB as<br />

compared with Baiyu controls. However, there was little effect on<br />

the total soluble solids in Ninghaibai fruits bagged with either<br />

Surface colour (n = 20)<br />

Cultivar Treatment Fruit mass (g) (n = 30) SSC (%) (n = 5) TA (%) (n = 5) L ∗ a ∗ b ∗ hab<br />

Baiyu CK 28.1 ± 6.3 a 13.1 ± 1.1 a 0.39 ± 0.00 b 65.1 ± 1.1 b 14.9 ± 1.3 a 44.0 ± 1.8 b 71.3 ± 1.6 b<br />

OWPB 24.2 ± 5.0 b 13.3 ± 0.9 a 0.30 ± 0.03 c 65.5 ± 0.9 b 14.7 ± 1.3 a 45.2 ± 1.3 a 71.9 ± 1.6 b<br />

TGDPB 24.1 ± 6.2 b 11.1 ± 1.6 b 0.55 ± 0.88 a 71.0 ± 1.8 a 10.3 ± 1.9 b 44.7 ± 1.8 ab 77.1 ± 2.5 a<br />

F-value 4.35 ∗ 13.07 ∗∗∗ 56.73 ∗∗∗ 150.36 ∗∗∗ 65.79 ∗∗∗ 3.14 ∗ 61.62 ∗∗∗<br />

LSD0.05 3.20 0.69 0.05 0.73 0.87 0.97 1.09<br />

Ninghaibai CK 29.4 ± 4.5a 14.2 ± 1.0a 0.23 ± 0.04c 65.6 ± 1.7b 14.4 ± 1.2a 42.8 ± 1.8c 71.4 ± 1.8c OWPB 27.3 ± 5.4a 14.1 ± 1.5a 0.32 ± 0.02a 68.7 ± 1.6a 10.6 ± 3.4b 45.7 ± 3.0b 77.1 ± 3.8b TGDPB 24.1 ± 4.0b 14.6 ± 1.4a 0.26 ± 0.18b 69.4 ± 2.0a 8.4 ± 1.9c 47.2 ± 2.4a 80.0 ± 2.2a F-value 6.97∗∗ 0.32 29.67∗∗∗ 32.25∗∗∗ 34.73∗∗∗ 18.66∗∗∗ 53.76∗∗∗ LSD0.05 2.70 1.03 0.02 0.97 1.40 1.41 1.62<br />

Values are expressed as means ± SD. Means within the same cultivar followed by the same superscript letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05.<br />

∗ Significant at P = 0.05.<br />

∗∗ significant at P = 0.01.<br />

∗∗∗ significant at P = 0.001.<br />

CK, control (unbagged); OWPB, one-layered white paper bags; TGDPB, two-layered paper bags with a black inner layer and a grey outer layer.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783–1788 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1785


1786<br />

Table 2. Effects of bagging on sugar content in loquat fruit (mg g −1 )<br />

www.soci.org H-X Xu, J-W Chen, M Xie<br />

Cultivar Treatment Sucrose Glucose Fructose Sorbitol Total sugar<br />

Baiyu CK 2.43 ± 0.04 b 29.0 ± 1.47 b 42.1 ± 2.14 b 2.26 ± 0.09 a 75.8 ± 3.71 b<br />

OWPB 3.00 ± 0.04 a 36.7 ± 0.10 a 47.6 ± 0.40 a 2.59 ± 0.24 a 89.9 ± 0.53 a<br />

TGDPB 2.27 ± 0.10 c 25.4 ± 1.34 c 42.3 ± 2.42 b 1.77 ± 0.10 b 71.8 ± 3.90 b<br />

F-value 91.85 ∗∗∗ 76.17 ∗∗∗ 8.19 ∗ 19.77 ∗∗ 27.87 ∗∗∗<br />

LSD0.05 0.14 2.29 3.76 0.32 6.24<br />

Ninghaibai CK 1.59 ± 0.08b 39.7 ± 2.57a 51.7 ± 3.32a 3.42 ± 0.56a 96.4 ± 6.30a OWPB 2.26 ± 0.10a 40.8 ± 0.99a 52.8 ± 1.67a 2.40 ± 0.10b 98.2 ± 2.31a TGDPB 2.57 ± 0.34a 35.1 ± 1.52b 45.6 ± 0.82b 2.15 ± 0.19b 85.5 ± 2.01b F-value 17.03∗ 8.07∗ 9.27∗ 11.50∗∗ 8.70∗ LSD0.05 0.42 3.63 4.39 0.69 8.08<br />

Values are expressed as means ± SD of three replications. Means within the same cultivar followed by the same superscript letters are not significantly<br />

different at P = 0.05.<br />

∗ Significant at P = 0.05.<br />

∗∗ significant at P = 0.01.<br />

∗∗∗ significant at P = 0.001.<br />

CK, control (unbagged); OWPB, one-layered white paper bags; TGDPB, two-layered paper bags with a black inner layer and a grey outer layer.<br />

OWPB or TGDPB, although the titratable acid content increased<br />

significantly compared with Ninghaibai controls.<br />

Surface colour is an important marketable (consumer acceptance)<br />

quality attribute and is a measure of L ∗ , a ∗ , b ∗ and hab.<br />

Table 1 shows that bagging improved fruit surface lightness as<br />

L ∗ was higher in the bagged than in the control fruits of both<br />

Baiyu and Ninghaibai. Fruit treated with TGDPB had the highest<br />

lightness values. Reduced light is known to promote the degradation<br />

of existing chlorophyll and inhibits carotenoid synthesis in<br />

fruit peel, 26 and this resulted in unbagged fruits having a lower<br />

hab and a more red than yellow hue (i.e. were more orange in<br />

colour compared with bagged fruits). In addition, fruits treated<br />

with TGDPB had higher hab than did those treated with OWPB.<br />

The effects of bagging on sugar content<br />

Sugar content is considered to be an important quality characteristic<br />

of fresh fruit. However, bagging with different materials<br />

can exert different effects on the composition of soluble sugars.<br />

For example, Padmavathamma and Hulamani 23 found that total<br />

sugars varied significantly with bag colour, whereas Yang et al. 27<br />

observed that bagging tended to reduce sugar content slightly,<br />

although the sugar content was not significantly affected by bag<br />

type. Table 2 indicates that the effects of bagging type on sugar<br />

content varied between cultivars. OWPB treatment increased the<br />

sucrose, glucose, fructose and sorbitol content and significantly<br />

increased the content of total sugar in Baiyu fruit. However, OWPB<br />

treatment increased the sucrose content, did not affect the glucose,<br />

fructose and total sugar content but decreased the sorbitol<br />

content in Ninghaibai fruit. Total sugar contents in Baiyu and Ninghaibai<br />

after TGDPB treatment were reduced by 5.6% and 11.3%,<br />

respectively, as compared with the controls.<br />

The effects of bagging on antioxidant compounds<br />

and antioxidant capacity<br />

Numerous studies have shown that fruit and vegetables are<br />

sources of diverse nutrient and non-nutrient molecules, many of<br />

which have antioxidant properties. The present study determined<br />

the antioxidant capacities of loquat fruit and analysed fruit extracts<br />

for compounds (total phenolic, flavonoid, carotenoid and vitamin<br />

C) that might contribute to the antioxidant activity. Table 3 shows<br />

that the total phenolic and flavonoid contents decreased after<br />

bagging treatment. Following OWPB and TGDPB treatment, the<br />

total phenolic content of Baiyu fruit was reduced by 9.5% and<br />

45.6%, respectively, and that of Ninghaibai fruit was reduced by<br />

5.0% and 26%, respectively. This indicates that bagging influences<br />

the metabolism of phenolic compounds, of which the flavonoids<br />

are the dominant family. The pattern of variation in flavonoid<br />

content was similar to that observed for total phenolic, with<br />

maximum levels occurring in unbagged Baiyu (28.2 ± 4.4 µgg −1 )<br />

and Ninghaibai (51.0 ± 6.4 µgg −1 ) fruits. The flavonoid content<br />

was also lower in TGDPB-treated fruits than in OWPB-treated fruit.<br />

Carotenoids and vitamin C are also the antioxidant compounds<br />

in loquat. The study found that the carotenoid and vitamin C<br />

contents increased after bagging fruit with OWBP, but decreased<br />

in fruit bagged with TGDBP. Our other experiments have also<br />

observed that the carotenoid and vitamin C content varies<br />

significantly with bag type; however, both decreased markedly<br />

when light was excluded during the maturation of loquat as<br />

compared with that of control fruit (data not shown).<br />

Three independent methods, the DPPH, TEAC and FRAP assays,<br />

were used to compare the antioxidant capacity of fruit extracts.<br />

The results presented in Table 3 show that the antioxidant<br />

potential of loquat fruit extracts was significantly affected by<br />

light transmittance. The highest antioxidant potential in both of<br />

Baiyu and Ninghaibai loquat fruits was under full sunlight and<br />

lowest under bagging with TGDPB.<br />

Table 4 indicates that the total phenolic content and antioxidant<br />

capacity are well correlated (DPPH, r = 0.64; TEAC, r = 0.77;<br />

FRAP, r = 0.90). Fruits with the highest phenolic content<br />

(unbagged fruits of Baiyu and Ninghaibai) had the highest<br />

antioxidant potentials whereas fruit extracts characterised by<br />

low total phenolic levels exhibited a poor antioxidant capacity.<br />

Numerous studies have reported similar linear relationships<br />

between antioxidant activities and phenolic content. 28–30 A<br />

good correlation was also observed between total flavonoid and<br />

antioxidant capacity (DPPH, r = 0.84; TEAC, r = 0.87; FRAP, r =<br />

0.99) (Table 4). Flavonoids are low-molecular-weight polyphenolic<br />

compounds that are widely distributed in fruit and vegetables, 31<br />

and many have been shown to have antioxidant 32 and anticancer<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783–1788


Effect of bagging on loquat fruit quality and antioxidant capacity www.soci.org<br />

Table 3. Changes in total phenolic, flavonoid, carotenoid and vitamin C content and antioxidant activities as assessed by DPPH, TEAC and FRAP<br />

assays of loquat fruit after bagging<br />

Cultivar Treatment<br />

Total phenolic<br />

(µg gallic acid<br />

g −1 FW)<br />

Flavonoid (µg<br />

rutin g −1 FW)<br />

Carotenoid (µg<br />

β-carotene g −1 FW)<br />

Vitamin C<br />

(µgascorbic<br />

acid g −1<br />

fresh weigh)<br />

DPPH (µmol<br />

Trolox g −1 FW)<br />

TEAC (µmol<br />

Trolox g −1 FW)<br />

FRAP (µmol<br />

Trolox g −1 FW)<br />

Baiyu CK 220.0 ± 26.9 a 28.2 ± 4.4 a 35.7 ± 4.1 b 13.6 ± 0.9 b 1.85 ± 0.10 a 1.61 ± 0.15 a 2.21 ± 0.09 a<br />

OWPB 199.2 ± 30.0 a 21.6 ± 2.7 b 48.3 ± 3.1 a 15.7 ± 0.6 a 1.54 ± 0.10 b 1.53 ± 0.12 a 1.96 ± 0.04 b<br />

TGDPB 119.7 ± 17.5 b 16.1 ± 1.4 c 27.4 ± 0.7 c 11.5 ± 0.7 c 1.22 ± 0.06 c 0.98 ± 0.04 b 1.65 ± 0.09 c<br />

F-value 59.60 ∗ 39.88 ∗ 63.90 ∗ 68.70 ∗ 143.55 ∗ 75.64 ∗ 110.54 ∗<br />

LSD0.05 21.73 2.77 3.62 0.75 0.08 0.12 0.07<br />

Ninghaibai CK 450.7 ± 31.1a 51.0 ± 6.4a 23.4 ± 0.3b 16.8 ± 1.5b 3.23 ± 0.12a 2.46 ± 0.17a 3.6 ± 0.16a OWPB 427.9 ± 24.7a 43.5 ± 3.7b 30.8 ± 0.3a 18.3 ± 0.5a 2.08 ± 0.06b 1.83 ± 0.05b 3.03 ± 0.11b TGDPB 333.5 ± 20.7b 30.3 ± 1.4c 24.5 ± 0.1b 15.4 ± 1.9c 1.59 ± 0.10c 1.62 ± 0.13c 2.32 ± 0.10c F-value 61.79∗ 71.08∗ 15.58∗ 9.78∗ 746.79∗ 111.49∗ 268.37∗ LSD0.05 23.05 3.54 3.03 1.37 0.09 0.12 0.11<br />

Values are expressed as means ± SD of five replications. Means within the same cultivar followed by the same superscript letter are not significantly<br />

different at P = 0.05.<br />

∗ Values are significant at P = 0.001.<br />

CK, control (unbagged); FW, fresh weight; OWPB, one-layered white paper bags; TGDPB, two-layered paper bags with a black inner layer and a grey<br />

outer layer.<br />

Table 4. Correlation coefficients of DPPH, TEAC and FRAP with<br />

respect to total phenolic, flavonoid, carotenoid and vitamin C content<br />

of loquat fruit<br />

Assay Total phenolic Flavonoid Carotenoid Vitamin C<br />

DPPH 0.64 0.84 ∗ 0.14 0.35<br />

TEAC 0.77 ∗ 0.87 ∗ 0.07 0.56<br />

FRAP 0.90 ∗∗ 0.99 ∗∗ 0.20 0.60<br />

∗ Significant at P = 0.05; ∗∗ significant at P = 0.01; (n = 6).<br />

properties. 33 Bagging resulted in lower irradiation, which has<br />

an important role in the synthesis of phenolic compounds.<br />

Bakhshi and Arakawa 34 reported that light irradiation could<br />

induce phenolic compound biosynthesis in the flesh of apples.<br />

Some studies have observed that enhanced light conditions could<br />

activate the expression of the flavonoid biosynthetic genes. 35–38 In<br />

addition, several studies have reported changes in the qualitative<br />

and quantitative composition of flavonoids as a consequence of<br />

high solar radiation. 39–41 Therefore, reduced light irradiation by<br />

bagging is the probable cause of the decreased total phenolic and<br />

flavonoid contents recorded in both loquat cultivars.<br />

However, the total carotenoid level does not contribute<br />

significantly to the antioxidant potential of loquat, as shown<br />

by the poor correlations between the DPPH, TEAC and FRAP<br />

measurements of antioxidant capacity and total carotenoid<br />

content. Similarly, vitamin C also makes a minor contribution to<br />

antioxidant capacity. Wang et al. 42 reported that the contribution<br />

of vitamin C to the total antioxidant activity of a fruit is


1788<br />

6 Hussein AA, Abdel-Rahman AG and Ahmed RB, Effectiveness of fruit<br />

bagging on yield and fruit quality of pomegranate (Punicagranatum<br />

L.). Ann Agric Sci 32:949–957 (1994).<br />

7 HuangCH,YuB,TengYW,SuJ,ShuQ,ChengZQ,et al,Effectsoffruit<br />

bagging on coloring and related physiology, and qualities of red<br />

Chinese sand pears during fruit maturation. Sci Hort 121:149–158<br />

(2009).<br />

8 Kim YH, Kim SK, Lim SC, Lee CH, Youn CK, Kim HH, et al, Effectsof<br />

bagging material on coloration, maturity, and quality of peach<br />

fruits. J Korean Soc Hort Sci 41:395–400 (2000).<br />

9 Duthie GG, Duthie SJ and Kyle JAM, Plant polyphenols in cancer and<br />

heart disease: implications as nutritional antioxidants. Nutr Res Rev<br />

13:79–106 (2000).<br />

10 Middleton E and Kandaswami C, The impact of plant flavonoids on<br />

mammalian biology: implication for immunity, inflammation and<br />

cancer, in The Flavonoids: Advances in <strong>Research</strong> since 1986, ed.by<br />

Harborne JB. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 619–952 (1994).<br />

11 Bahorun T, Trotin F, Pommery J, Vasseur J and Pinkas M, Antioxidant<br />

activities of Crataegus monogyna extracts. Planta Med 60:323–328<br />

(1994).<br />

12 Bahorun T, Gressier B, Trotin F, Brunet C, Dine T, Luyckx M, et al,<br />

Oxygen species scavenging activity of phenolic extracts from<br />

hawthorn fresh plant organs and pharmaceutical preparations.<br />

Arzneimittelforschung 46:1086–1089 (1996).<br />

13 Bahorun T, Trotin F and Vasseur J, Polyphenol production in Crataegus<br />

tissue cultures (hawthorn), in Biotechnology in Agriculture and<br />

Forestry: Medicinal and Aromatic Plants XII, ed.byNagataTand<br />

Ebizuka Y. Springer, Berlin, pp. 23–49 (2002).<br />

14 Chen JW, Zhang SL, Zhang LC, Zhao ZZ and Xu JG, Fruit<br />

photosynthesis and assimilate translocation and partitioning: Their<br />

characteristics and role in sugar accumulation in developing Citrus<br />

unshiu fruit. Acta Botan Sin 44:158–163 (2002).<br />

15 Reyes LF, Villarreal JE and Cisneros-Zevallos L, The increase in<br />

antioxidant capacity after wounding depends on the type of fruit<br />

or vegetable tissue. Food Chem 101:1254–1262 (2007).<br />

16 Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis,<br />

16th edn. AOAC International, Arlington, VA, pp. 16–17 (1995).<br />

17 Swain T and Hillis WE, The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica,<br />

I – the quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. JSciFoodAgric<br />

10:63–68 (1959).<br />

18 Singleton VL and Rossi JA, Colorimetry of total phenolics with<br />

phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic<br />

16:144–158 (1965).<br />

19 Jia ZS, Tang MC and Wu JM, The determination of flavonoid contents<br />

in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals.<br />

Food Chem 64:555–559 (1999).<br />

20 Braca A, Tommasi ND, Bari LD, Pizza C, Politi M and Morelli I,<br />

Antioxidant principles from Bauhinia terapotensis. J Nat Prod<br />

64:892–895 (2001).<br />

21 Re R, Pellegrini N and Anna PA, Antioxidant activity applying an<br />

improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radical<br />

Biol Med 26:1231–1237 (1999).<br />

22 Benzie IFF and Strain JJ, The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP)<br />

as a measure of ‘‘antioxidant power’’: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem<br />

239:70–76 (1996).<br />

23 Padmavathamma AS and Hulamani NC, Studies on the effect of fruit<br />

bagging on size, quality and colour development of pomegranate<br />

(Punica granatum C.). J Res ANGRAU 24:96–99 (1996).<br />

www.soci.org H-X Xu, J-W Chen, M Xie<br />

24 Arakawa O, Uematsu N and Nakajima H, Effect of bagging on fruit<br />

quality in apples. Bull Faculty Agric Hirosaki Univ 57:25–32 (1994).<br />

25 Hasan MA, Bhattacharjee S and Debnath U, Fruit quality and<br />

microclimate variation inside the bunch cover of Dwarf Cavendish<br />

banana (Musa AAA). OrissaJHort29:46–50 (2001).<br />

26 Lopez M, Candela ME and Sabarer F, Carotenoids from Capsicum<br />

annuum fruits: Influence of spectral quality of radiation. Biol Plant<br />

28:100–104 (1986).<br />

27 Yang WH, Zhu XC, Bu JH, Hu GB, Wang HC and Huang XM, Effects of<br />

baggingonfruitdevelopmentandqualityincross-winteroff-season<br />

longan. Sci Hort 120:194–200 (2009).<br />

28 PriorRL, CaoG, MartinA, SoficE, McewenJ, O’BrienB, et al,<br />

Antioxidant capacity as influenced by total phenolic and<br />

anthocyanin content, maturity and variety of Vaccinium species.<br />

J Agric Food Chem 46:2686–2693 (1998).<br />

29 Ehlenfeldt MK and Prior RL, Oxygen radical absorbance capacity<br />

(ORAC) and phenolic and anthocyanin concentrations in fruit and<br />

leaf tissues of highbush blueberry. J Agric Food Chem 49:2222–2227<br />

(2001).<br />

30 Deighton N, Brennan R, Finn C and Davies HV, Antioxidant properties<br />

of domesticated and wild Rubus species. J Agric Food Chem<br />

80:1307–1313 (2000).<br />

31 Namiki M, Antioxidants/antimutagens in food. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr<br />

29:273–300 (1990).<br />

32 Birt DF, Hendrich S and Wang W, Dietary agents in cancer prevention:<br />

flavonoids and isoflavonoids. Pharmacol Ther 90:157–177 (2001).<br />

33 Cantuti-Castelvetri I, Shukitt-Hale B and Joseph JA, Neurobehavioural<br />

aspects of antioxidants in aging. Int J Develop Neurosci 18:367–381<br />

(2000).<br />

34 Bakhshi D and Arakawa O, Induction of phenolic compounds<br />

biosynthesis with light irradiation in the flesh of red and yellow<br />

apples. J Appl Hort 8:101–104 (2006).<br />

35 Logemann E, Wu S, Schröder J, Schmelzer E, Somssich I and<br />

Hahlbrock K, Gene activation by UV light, fungal elicitor or fungal<br />

infection in Petroselinum crispum is correlated with repression of<br />

cell cycle-related genes. Plant J 8:865–876 (1995).<br />

36 Logemann E, Tavernaro A, Schulz W, Somssich IE and Hahlbrock K,<br />

UV light selectively coinduces supply pathways from primary<br />

metabolism and flavonoid secondary product formation in parsley.<br />

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:1903–1907 (2000).<br />

37 Bieza K and Lois R, An Arabidopsis mutant tolerant to lethal ultraviolet-<br />

B levels shows constitutively elevated accumulation of flavonoids<br />

and other phenolics. Plant Physiol 126:1105–1115 (2001).<br />

38 Jaakola L, Määttä-Riihinen K, Kärenlampi S and Hohtola A, Activation<br />

of flavonoid biosynthesis by solar radiation in bilberry (Vaccinium<br />

myrtillus L.) leaves. Planta 218:721–728 (2004).<br />

39 Awad M, Wagenmakers P and de Jager A, Effects of light on flavonoid<br />

and chlorogenic acid levels in the skin of ‘Jonagold’ apples. Sci Hort<br />

88:289–298 (2001).<br />

40 Kolb C, Käser M, Kopec´yJ,ZotzG,RiedererMandPfündel E, Effects of<br />

natural intensities of visible and ultraviolet radiation on epidermal<br />

ultraviolet screening and photosynthesis in grape leaves. Plant<br />

Physiol 127:863–875 (2001).<br />

41 Tattini M, Gravano E, Pinelli P, Mulinacci N and Romani A, Flavonoids<br />

accumulate in leaves and glandular trichomes of Phillyrea latifolia<br />

exposed to excess solar radiation. New Phytol 148:69–77 (2000).<br />

42 Wang H, Cao G and Prior RL, Total antioxidant capacity of fruits. JAgric<br />

Food Chem 44:701–705 (1996).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1783–1788


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 16 February 2010 Revised: 8 April 2010 Accepted: 15 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 25 May 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4014<br />

Preparation of a monoclonal antibody and<br />

development of an indirect competitive ELISA<br />

for the detection of chlorpromazine residue in<br />

chicken and swine liver<br />

Wei Liu, a Weihua Li, a Weiwei Yin, a Meng Meng, b∗ Yuping Wan, c<br />

Caiwei Feng, c Shanliang Wang c and Rimo Xi b∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Chlorpromazine is a typical antipsychotic drug used to make food-producing animals calm and promote growth<br />

as feed additives. Accumulation of chlorpromazine in animal bodies would cause side effects in the circulatory and nervous<br />

systems, and have adverse effects on blood cells, the skin and the eye. To detect the chlorpromazine residue in food producing<br />

animals, an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed based on preparation of an<br />

anti-chlorpromazine monoclonal antibody.<br />

RESULTS: The antibody generated from immunogen of cationic bovine serum albumin (cBSA) coupled with chlorpromazine<br />

showed high sensitivity toward chlorpromazine with an IC50 value of 0.73 ppb. The ELISA method was applied to detect swine<br />

liver and chicken samples spiked by chlorpromazine and satisfactory results were obtained. The recovery rates in chicken and<br />

swine liver were in the range of 88–95% and 86–95%, respectively; the intra-assay coefficients of variation were both


1790<br />

F<br />

F<br />

O<br />

O<br />

N<br />

S<br />

N<br />

www.soci.org W Liu et al.<br />

Acepromazine Chloropromazine<br />

Azaperone<br />

Haloperidol<br />

Figure 1. Chlorpromazine and other structurally related sedatives analysed in this study.<br />

raphy–mass spectrometry14 – 16 have been used. These methods<br />

require extensive sample preparation, sometimes expensive apparatus,<br />

highly trained personnel to operate sophisticated instruments<br />

and interpret complicated results, and can only determine<br />

a limited number of samples at one time. Therefore these methods<br />

are not suitable as screening tests. In contrast, because of the rapidity,<br />

mobility, convenience, high sensitivity, and low detection limit,<br />

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods have been<br />

N<br />

N<br />

N<br />

OH<br />

used for the detection of various drug residues in real systems.<br />

O<br />

N<br />

17 – 22<br />

A key factor for an ELISA test is whether a polyclonal antibody<br />

or monoclonal antibody (MAb) towards the compound detected<br />

was used. Compared with a polyclonal antibody, the application<br />

of a monoclonal antibody is advantageous in terms of better<br />

purity, satisfactory sensitivity and high specificity. 23 – 26 In this<br />

paper, an ELISA test kit based on a monoclonal antibody toward<br />

chlorpromazine was developed and applied to detect chlorpromazine<br />

spiked in swine liver and chicken samples. This study is<br />

the first to prepare a monoclonal antibody of chlorpromazine<br />

and develop an immunoassay based on an antibody to detect<br />

residues of chlorpromazine in swine liver and chicken.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Chemicals and materials<br />

Bovine serum albumin (BSA), ovalbumin (OVA) and goat<br />

anti-mouse IgG–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate<br />

were provided by Beijing Wanger Biotechnology Co., Ltd.<br />

(Beijing, China). o-Phenylenediamine (OPD) and 3,3 ′ ,5,5 ′ -<br />

F<br />

Cl<br />

N<br />

S<br />

OH<br />

N<br />

S<br />

Azaperol<br />

N<br />

Promethazine<br />

N<br />

N<br />

Cl<br />

N<br />

tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), N,N ′ -dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC)<br />

and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Xinjingke<br />

Biotechnology (Beijing, China). Freund’s complete (cFA) and incomplete<br />

adjuvants (iFA) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St<br />

Louis, MO, USA). n-Hexane, hydrochloric acid, dimethylsulfoxide<br />

(DMSO), sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, acetonitrile, hydrogen<br />

peroxide (30% H2O2) and other reagents used were provided by<br />

Guangmang Chemical Co. (Jinan, China). Chicken samples were<br />

purchased from commodity exchange and swine liver samples<br />

were from a supermarket in Jinan City, China.<br />

Instrumentation and supplies<br />

ELISA was performed on polystyrene 96-well microtitre plates (Bio<br />

Basic Inc., Ontario, Canada) and spectrophotometrically read with<br />

a GF-M3000 microplate reader (Ruicong Shanghai Technology<br />

Development Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). Centrifugation was<br />

carried out with a Biofuge Stratos refrigerated centrifuge (Heraeus,<br />

Hanau, Germany). Protein dialyses were performed using dialysis<br />

bags from Aibo Economic & Trade Co., Ltd (Jinan, China). LC-MS<br />

was performed on a LC/MS-2010A instrument from Shimadzu<br />

(Kyoto, Japan).<br />

Buffers<br />

Ultra-pure deionised water was used for the preparation of all<br />

buffers and reagents for the immunoassays, unless especially<br />

indicated. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) consisted of<br />

138 mmol L −1 NaCl, 1.5 mmol L −1 KH2PO4, 7 mmol L −1 Na2HPO4<br />

and 2.7 mmol L −1 KCl. The wash buffer (PBST) was a PBS buffer<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1789–1795<br />

N


Detection of chlorpromazine in swine liver and chicken by ELISA www.soci.org<br />

added 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20. 0.05 M carbonate buffer (15 mmol L −1<br />

Na2CO3 and 35 mmol L −1 NaHCO3, pH9.6)wasusedasacoating<br />

buffer. The blocking buffer was a solution of PBS mixed with<br />

1% of OVA and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20. The substrate buffer was<br />

0.1 mol L −1 sodium acetate/citrate buffer (pH 5.0). Eighty millilitres<br />

of acetonitrile added to 20 mL of 0.1 mol L −1 HCl was used as the<br />

extractive solution. To prepare the substrate solution, 10 mg of<br />

TMB + 5 mL DMSO was defined as substrate solution A and 5 µLof<br />

H2O2 [30% (w/w)] + 15 mL citrate buffer was defined as solution<br />

B. The stopping solution was 2 mol L −1 H2SO4.<br />

Preparation of immunogen and coating antigen<br />

Modification of hapten<br />

As described in Fig. 2 (Scheme 1), the mixture of acepromazine<br />

(compound I) (10 mg, 0.031 mmol) in 2.5 mL of ethanol and<br />

hydroxylamine hydrochloride (2.5 mg) in 1.0 mL of distill water<br />

was stirring under reflux in water bath for 2.5 h. A solution of NaOH<br />

(1.0 mL, 0.05 mol L −1 ) was added dropwise during the procedure.<br />

An acetate buffer (1.0 mL, pH 4.0) was added dropwise followed<br />

by adding 4 mg of ice until a white precipitate appeared. The<br />

white solid was isolated by centrifugation (10 000 × g)after1day.<br />

The white solid was dissolved in DMF (2.5 mL) and the mixture<br />

was kept reaction at room temperature for 2 h after succinic<br />

anhydride was added. The reaction was continuing for 4 h after<br />

100 mL of triethylamine was added to yield chlorpromazine hapten<br />

(compound III).<br />

Preparation of immunogen<br />

The immunogen of chlorpromazine was prepared via a mixed<br />

acid anhydride reaction (Fig. 2, Scheme I). In this procedure, 15 µL<br />

of isobutyl chloroformate was added into the 1.0 mL of hapten<br />

prepared above at 10 ◦ C to obtain solution A. The solution B<br />

was prepared by dissolving 36 mg of BSA in 2 mL of sodium<br />

carbonate (50 mmol L −1 ). Under stirring, the solution A was added<br />

dropwise into solution B with molar ratio of hapten : BSA =<br />

10 : 1 for 4 h at 10 ◦ C to get the immunogen of cationic BSA<br />

(cBSA)–chlorpromazine (compound V). The mixture was stirred<br />

overnight at 4 ◦ C and dialysed for 3 days against PBS (0.01 mol L −1 ),<br />

exchanging the dialysis solution twice each day. The solution<br />

obtained was stored at −20 ◦ C for future use.<br />

Preparation of coating antigen<br />

The mixture of 1.0 mL of hapten (compound III) obtained in<br />

procedure Scheme I, 20 mg of DCC, and 12.5 mg of NHS in 0.5 mL<br />

of DMF was stirring for 24 h at room temperature to obtain solution<br />

C. The solution D was prepared by dissolving 50 mg OVA in 3.5 mL<br />

of PBS (0.01 mol L −1 , pH 7.2). The solution C was added dropwise<br />

into solution D and the mixture obtained was stirred at room<br />

temperature for 3 h to remove small amounts of impurities. The<br />

precipitation was removed by centrifugation at 13 000 × g for<br />

30 min and the supernatant was collected to obtain the coating of<br />

cationic OVA (cOVA)–chlorpromazine (compound VII), which was<br />

stored at −20 ◦ C for future use.<br />

Immunisation, cell fusion and purification of MAbs<br />

BALB/c mice were initially immunised by an intraperitoneal injection<br />

of 150 µg of cBSA–chlorpromazine in an equal volume of cFA.<br />

Two weeks later, a booster injection was performed using the same<br />

amount of cBSA–chlorpromazine in iFA. More double boosts were<br />

continued with 100 mg cBSA–chlorpromazine given in the tail vein<br />

at an interval of 2 weeks. After the immune response had been validated,<br />

the splenocytes from immunised mice were fused with a<br />

logarithmically growing hypoxanthine–aminopterin–thymidine<br />

(HAT)-sensitive mouse myeloma cells Sp2/0 (7 : 1) by the polyethylene<br />

glycol (PEG) method. The hybridoma cells were screened by<br />

indirect ELISA and cloned by the limited dilution method. The<br />

hybridoma cells were cultured in the medium (pH 7.4) containing<br />

0.2% NaHCO3 and RPMI1640 added 20% newborn calf serum<br />

in 37 ◦ C to obtain MAbs for chlorpromazine. The purification was<br />

performed according to the acid–ammonium sulfate method, and<br />

the purified MAbs obtained was stored at −20 ◦ C for future use.<br />

Antibody titre determination by indirect competitive ELISA<br />

The antibody titre was tested by indirect ELISA. The procedure<br />

was carried out as described below. The microplates were coated<br />

with coating antigen cOVA–chlorpromazine at 1/500, 1/1000 and<br />

1/2000 by overnight incubation at 4 ◦ C. Plates were washed with<br />

wash buffer three times and blocked with 250 µLwell −1 of blocking<br />

buffer, followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Plates<br />

were washed three times again, then the appropriate dilution<br />

of antisera was added, and the plates were incubated for 2 h at<br />

room temperature. After the plates had been washed three times,<br />

goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1 : 1000, 100 µL well −1 ) was added,<br />

followed by incubation for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were<br />

washed three times and TMB substrate solution A and B was added<br />

(50 µL well −1 ) in turn. After that, the plates were incubated for<br />

another 15 min at room temperature. The colour development<br />

was inhibited by adding stopping solution (100 µL well −1 ), and<br />

absorbances were measured at 450 nm. Absorbance values were<br />

corrected by blank reading. Pre-immune withdrawal serum (the<br />

serum before immunisation) was used as a negative control, and<br />

the antibody titre was defined as the reciprocal of the dilution that<br />

resulted in an absorbance value of twice the blank value.<br />

Development of indirect competitive ELISA<br />

The checker-board procedure was used to obtain the optimised<br />

coating antigen and the primary antibody concentrations.<br />

To each well of a 96-well plate, 100 µL of10µg mL −1 of<br />

cOVA–chlorpromazine in bicarbonate buffer (0.05 mol L −1 , pH<br />

9.6) was added, and the mixture was incubated overnight at 4 ◦ C.<br />

The plate was washed with wash buffer three times between each<br />

step, and blocked with 250 µL well −1 of blocking buffer, followed<br />

by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. After the blocking<br />

solution was removed, 100 µL of primary antibody was added to<br />

each well followed by the addition of PBST buffer or competitor<br />

in PBST buffer, and the plate was incubated for 2 h. Then, the goat<br />

anti-mouse IgG HRP (1 : 1000, 100 µL well −1 ) was added, followed<br />

by incubation for 2 h at room temperature. Substrate solutions<br />

A and B were added (50 µL well −1 ) in turn, and the plate was<br />

incubated for another 15 min at room temperature. The colour development<br />

was inhibited by adding stopping solution (2 mol L −1<br />

H2SO4, 100 µL well −1 ), and absorbance was measured at 450 nm.<br />

Absorbance was corrected by blank reading. Pre-immune withdrawal<br />

serum was used as a negative control. The result was<br />

expressed in % inhibition as follows: % inhibition = %B/B0, where<br />

B is the absorbance of the well with competitor and B0 is the<br />

absorbance of the well without competitor.<br />

Standard curve generation<br />

The cOVA–chlorpromazine (1/1000) was used as coating antigen,<br />

and indirect cELISA was performed as described above. The<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1789–1795 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1791


1792<br />

Scheme 1<br />

N<br />

S<br />

(III) +<br />

Scheme 2<br />

N O<br />

NH 2 OH⋅HCl<br />

N<br />

S<br />

www.soci.org W Liu et al.<br />

N<br />

N OH<br />

(I) (II) (III)<br />

(III)<br />

O<br />

Cl O<br />

isobutyl chloroformate<br />

O<br />

+ HO N<br />

O<br />

Et3N DMF<br />

DCC<br />

DMF<br />

N<br />

S<br />

(IV)<br />

N<br />

S<br />

O<br />

O<br />

O<br />

O<br />

N<br />

N O C CH2CH2COCOOCH2CH(CH3 ) 2<br />

BSA-NH 2<br />

(V)<br />

O<br />

N<br />

N O C CH2CH2CO N<br />

S<br />

N<br />

S<br />

N<br />

OVA NH 2<br />

N<br />

O<br />

N<br />

S<br />

NH BSA<br />

N O C (CH2 ) 2COO (VI)<br />

O<br />

O<br />

N<br />

N O C CH2CH2COOH N<br />

O<br />

O<br />

N O C (CH2 ) 2CH2OO (VII)<br />

NH OVA<br />

Figure 2. The synthetic procedure for immunogen of cBSA–chlorpromazine (Scheme 1) and the coating antigen of cOVA–chlorpromazine (Scheme 2).<br />

selected antiserum at 1/8000 dilution was utilised as primary<br />

antibody and co-incubated with chlorpromazine. The standard<br />

calibration curve with final chlorpromazine concentrations of 0.05,<br />

0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 10.0 ng mL −1 was run in PBST.<br />

The pretreatment of the samples (swine liver and chicken)<br />

The sample was first milled for 10–15 min for homogenising. One<br />

gram of the chicken was weighed into a polythene tube, and<br />

then 4 mL of the extraction solution was added. The mixture was<br />

shaken vigorously for 5 min and centrifuged at room temperature<br />

(20–25 ◦ C) for 10 min at 3000×g. Two millilitres of the supernatant<br />

was transferred and mixed with 4 mL of 1 mol L −1 NaOH, and then<br />

10 mL of n-hexane was added. After being shaken vigorously<br />

for 5 min, the mixture was centrifuged at room temperature<br />

(20–25 ◦ C) for 5 min at 3000 × g. Five millilitres of the supernatant<br />

was extracted and placed into a 50 mL of round-bottom glass flask.<br />

Then the solution was evaporated to dryness at low pressure at<br />

55 ◦ C. Then, 1 mL of PBST was added to the flask and the solution<br />

was treated as the blank sample which was stored at 0–4 ◦ Cfor<br />

future use.<br />

Optimisation of the blank sample<br />

Three different chicken and swine liver samples were purchased<br />

from different supermarkets for preparing blank samples. The<br />

absorbance of the blank samples was tested by the indirect<br />

ELISA method, as described below. The microplates were coated<br />

with coating antigen cOVA–pefloxacin at 1/1000 by overnight<br />

incubation at 4 ◦ C. Plates were washed with wash buffer three<br />

times and blocked with 250 µLwell −1 of blocking buffer, followed<br />

by incubation for 1 h at room temperature. Plates were washed<br />

three times again, then the blank samples (50 µLwell −1 ), incubated<br />

with the antibody (1/8000, 50 µL well −1 ), were added. The plates<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1789–1795


Detection of chlorpromazine in swine liver and chicken by ELISA www.soci.org<br />

were incubated for 2 h at room temperature, then washed three<br />

times, and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (1 : 1000, 100 µL well −1 )was<br />

added, followed by incubation for 2 h at room temperature. Plates<br />

were washed three times and TMB substrate solutions A and B<br />

were added (50 µL well −1 ) in turn, and the plates were incubated<br />

for another 15 min at room temperature. The colour development<br />

was halted by adding stopping solution (100 µL well −1 ), and<br />

absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Absorbance was compared<br />

with the blank reading of wells with PBST added instead of samples.<br />

The selected blank sample was defined according to the standard<br />

curve.<br />

The blank sample selected was spiked with chlorpromazine<br />

standard solution in PBST. Competitive curves with final chlorpromazine<br />

concentrations of 0.05, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 10 ng mL −1<br />

were run in PBST and in blank sample to determine the matrix<br />

effect of swine liver and chicken. IC50 and B0 values from the blank<br />

sample curve were obtained by comparing IC50 and B0 values<br />

generated from the PBST buffer solution.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Preparation of antigen and characterisation of the antibody<br />

As a small molecule, chlorpromazine has to be connected with<br />

carrier protein in order to be immunogenic. The structure of<br />

chlorpromazine (Fig. 1) showed that the side chain composed<br />

of N–(CH2)3 –N(CH3)2 is a very important structural feature for<br />

this molecule. In order to obtain a specific antibody towards<br />

chlorpromazine, it will be important to expose this chain outside<br />

instead of connecting this chain directly to avoid covering the most<br />

important structural feature by carrier protein. There is no suitable<br />

functional group in the chlorpromazine molecule to use for linking<br />

with carrier protein. To synthesise an immunogen for preparation<br />

of anti-chlorpromazine antibody, acepromazine was chosen as the<br />

starting material because there is acetyl group in the acepromazine<br />

molecule (Fig. 2, Scheme 1), which can be used as a linking site<br />

with carrier protein. Considering that the acetyl group is located<br />

in a position that is close to the side chain N–(CH2)3 –N(CH3)2, it<br />

requires a chain to separate hapten from carrier protein to ensure<br />

that the hapten is uncovered by carrier protein. First, acepromazine<br />

reacted with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to form an immediate<br />

(II) (Fig. 2, Scheme 1), which was then treated by succinic anhydride<br />

to form activated immediate (III). This derivatisation introduced a<br />

carboxylic acid moiety into the hapten, which was a convenient<br />

functional group for conjugation with a carrier protein. The space<br />

arm consisting of seven atoms will be helpful to increase the<br />

reorganisation of antibody to chlorpramazine hapten. Starting<br />

from compound (III), both immunogen and coating antigen could<br />

be prepared with different carrier proteins. The immunogen was<br />

prepared through a mixed anhydride method to link hapten with<br />

carrier protein BSA (cBSA) (Fig. 2). The coating antigen using OVA<br />

as carrier protein was prepared by the DCC method in DMF as<br />

shown in Fig. 2 (Scheme 2). The yields of immunogen and coating<br />

antigen obtained from Scheme 1 and Scheme 2 were both more<br />

than 30%.<br />

In order to characterise the antibody produced in this<br />

research, the titre, sensitivity and cross-reactivity were determined<br />

according to the indirect competitive ELISA procedure described<br />

above. The titre of the antibody determined for the ELISA method<br />

was defined as the reciprocal of the dilution which resulted in<br />

an absorbance value that was twice of the background value.<br />

The titre of Mabs developed by the immunisation process<br />

was more than 100 000 for all mice. The prepared antibody<br />

B/B 0 (%)<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0.1 1 10<br />

Chlorpromazine concentration (log[ppb])<br />

Figure 3. Inhibition curve of anti-chlorpromazine monoclonal antibody<br />

with chlorpromazine as a competitor in PBST.<br />

Table 1. IC50 and percentage of cross-reactivities of selected<br />

compounds<br />

Compound IC50 a (ppb) Cross-reactivities b (%)<br />

Chlorpromazine 0.73 100<br />

Acepromazine 75.0 1.0<br />

Promethazine >150 750 750 150


1794<br />

B/B 0<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

y = 0.42724 – 0.54079x<br />

R 2 = 0.99834<br />

Chlorpromazine concentration (ppb)<br />

Figure 4. Standard calibration curve of indirect competitive ELISA in PBST.<br />

Table 2. Calculation and summary of limit of detection (LOD) of swine<br />

liver and chicken samples<br />

Parameter Swine liver samples Chicken samples<br />

Number of samples 20 20<br />

Added (µgkg−1 ) 0 0<br />

Means observed<br />

(µgkg−1 )<br />

0.10 0.08<br />

Standard deviation<br />

(s) (µgkg−1 )<br />

0.12 0.08<br />

Mean + 3s (µgkg−1 ) 0.46 0.32<br />

Highest observed<br />

blank (µgkg−1 )<br />

0.30 0.20<br />

LOD (µgkg−1 ) 0.45 0.31<br />

Determination of matrix effect on the indirect competitive<br />

ELISA<br />

According to the Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90, chlorpromazine<br />

must not to be detectable in ‘veterinary medicinal products<br />

in respect of all the various foodstuffs of animal origin, including<br />

meat, fish, milk, eggs and honey’, so we detected chlorpromazine<br />

in foodstuffs of animal origin. We selected two classic animal tissues<br />

from two classic animals commonly fed by chlorpromazine<br />

for validation. One was chicken, another was swine liver. In addition,<br />

it is reported that pigs are particularly sensitive to the change<br />

of surrounding conditions, so the stress could cause high morality<br />

rates or make pigs produce low-quality meat, pale and soft. These<br />

serious adverse events make farmers utilise more sedatives as<br />

feed additives. Hence, swine liver samples were also selected to<br />

evaluate the ELISA established in our study in biological system<br />

besides chicken samples. Other matrices, such as urine, milk, eggs<br />

and honey, have not been analysed yet.<br />

To determine the limit of detection (LOD), 20 batches of blank<br />

swine liver samples and 20 batches of blank chicken samples were<br />

purchased from the local supermarket. All the samples have been<br />

tested by LC-MS to make sure there is no chlorpromazine residue<br />

in them.<br />

The linear range of the ELISA determined as the concentration<br />

of 20–80% inhibition of maximal absorbance value was<br />

0.60–2.0 ppb, and the B/B0 valueinthisrangewasplottedversus<br />

chlorpromazine concentration to obtain standard curve (Fig. 4).<br />

1<br />

www.soci.org W Liu et al.<br />

2<br />

Table 3. Inter- and intra-assay variations of swine liver and chicken<br />

samples spiked with chlorpromazine<br />

Level (µg<br />

kg −1 ) n<br />

Average<br />

recovery (%)<br />

Inter-assay<br />

variation a (%)<br />

Intra-assay<br />

variation b (%)<br />

Swine liver<br />

0.5 4 95.6 12.6 13.5<br />

1.0 4 86.2 9.7 11.0<br />

2.0 4 90.0 11.5 12.8<br />

4.0 4 89.2 11.0 11.7<br />

Chicken<br />

0.5 4 94.1 10.6 12.2<br />

1.0 4 92.4 13.0 15.3<br />

2.0 4 88.9 12.4 13.9<br />

4.0 4 91.2 10.8 11.3<br />

a Inter-assay variation was determined by four replicates on 15 different<br />

days.<br />

b Intra-assay variation was determined by four replicates on a single<br />

day.)<br />

The curve obtained showed good linearity (R 2 = 0.9983) in this<br />

range. Using this curve, the 20 blank samples were analysed using<br />

the ELISA to demonstrate the range of blank matrix effects<br />

in the assay. As shown in Table 2, results of these 20 known<br />

chlorpromazine-free samples gave a mean of 0.10 µgkg −1 for<br />

swine liver samples and 0.08 µg kg −1 for chicken samples. The<br />

highest observed blank was 0.30 µgkg −1 for swine liver samples<br />

and 0.20 µgkg −1 for chicken samples. As a general rule, 27 the<br />

LOD is defined as the mean observed chlorpromazine concentration<br />

plus three times the standard deviations, or the highest<br />

observed chlorpromazine concentration, whichever the greater.<br />

As was shown in Table 2, in both cases, the LOD was determined<br />

by the mean plus three standard deviations due to their higher<br />

values compared to the highest observed blank value.<br />

The same swine liver and chicken samples spiked by 0.5, 1.0 and<br />

2.0 µg kg −1 , respectively, were measured by the immunoassay to<br />

determine the variations of the ELISA method. As was shown in<br />

Table 3, the variation of coefficients were determined to be in the<br />

range 9.7–13.0% for inter-assay and 11.0–15.3% for intra-assay,<br />

whereas the average recovery rates were in the range 86.2–95.6%,<br />

indicating satisfactory accuracy and precision.<br />

In our study, the animal tissues analysed were spiked with<br />

chlorpromazine in vitro, in order to evaluate the matrix effect on<br />

recovery and variation efficiency of the method. However, in vivo,<br />

chlorpromazine is rapidly metabolised. Based on the evaluation<br />

of chlorpromazine by JECFA, 8 the major metabolic pathways are<br />

hydroxylation, oxidation, demethylation and glucuronidation. The<br />

metabolites varied differently in different species. Further work of<br />

our study is to apply the method in the analysis of tissues from<br />

animals fed by chlorpromazine and specifically demonstrate the<br />

antibody with chlorpromazine metabolites in different animals.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

In summary, an immunogen of chlorpromazine was designed<br />

and synthesised. The monoclonal antibody for chlorpromazine<br />

based on the immunogen was prepared for the first time. The<br />

antibody showed high sensitivity with an IC50 value of 0.73 ppb,<br />

limit of detection of 0.05 ppb and specificity with almost no<br />

cross-reactivity towards commonly used sedatives. When applied<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1789–1795


Detection of chlorpromazine in swine liver and chicken by ELISA www.soci.org<br />

to detect chlorpromazine spiked in swine liver and chicken,<br />

satisfactory accuracy and precision were obtained. Hopefully,<br />

the ELISA test method is an alternative to chromatography for<br />

regulatory analysis of chlorpromazine residues in foodstuffs of<br />

animal orgin.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This research was supported by the National Natural Science<br />

Foundation of China (No.20675048), the Shandong Natural Science<br />

Foundation (Y2008B31), the National High-Tech <strong>Research</strong> and the<br />

Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 07AA10Z435,<br />

No. 2007AA06A407).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Amaral L, Viveiros M and Molnar J, Antimicrobial activity of<br />

phenothiazines. In Vivo 18:725–731 (2004).<br />

2 Kojlo A, Karpinska J and Kuzmicka L, Analytical study of the reaction<br />

of phenothiazines with some oxidants, metal ions, and organic<br />

substances. J Trace Microprobe Techniques 19:45–70 (2001).<br />

3 Amaral L, Kristiansen JE and Viveiros M, Activity of phenothiazines<br />

against antibiotic-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a review<br />

supporting further studies that may elucidate the potential use of<br />

thioridazine as anti-tuberculosis therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother<br />

47:505–511 (2001).<br />

4 Dyer KS and Woolf AD, Use of phenothiazines as sedatives in<br />

children – What are the risks? Drug Saf 21:81–90 (1999).<br />

5 Thornley B, Adams CE and Awad AG, Chlorpromazine versus placebo<br />

for the treatment of schizophrenia: A systematic review. Schizophr<br />

Res 29:155–155 (1998).<br />

6 Rijcken CAW, Monster TBM and Brouwers JRBJ, Chlorpromazine<br />

equivalents versus defined daily doses: How to compare<br />

antipsychotic drug doses? J Clin Psychopharmacol 23:657–659<br />

(2003).<br />

7 Cooper J, Delahaut P and Fodey TL, Development of a rapid screening<br />

test for veterinary sedatives and the beta-blocker carazolol in<br />

porcine kidney by ELISA. Analyst 129:169–174 (2004).<br />

8 Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food, in Thirty-eighth<br />

Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.<br />

World Health Organization, Geneva (1991).<br />

9 Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products, Chlorpromazine<br />

– summary report, in EMEA/MRL/111/96-FINAL, The European<br />

Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Veterinary<br />

Medicines Evaluation Unit (1996).<br />

10 EEC, Council Regulation (EEC) 2377/90 of 26 June 1990. Off J Eur<br />

Commun L224:1–6 (1990).<br />

11 Cruz-Vera M, Lucena R and Cardenas S, Determination of<br />

phenothiazine derivatives in human urine by using ionic liquidbased<br />

dynamic liquid-phase microextraction coupled with liquid<br />

chromatography. J Chromatogr B 877:37–42 (2009).<br />

12 Sobhi HR, Yamini Y and Abadi RHHB, Extraction and determination of<br />

trace amounts of chlorpromazine in biological fluids using hollow<br />

fiber liquid phase microextraction followed by high-performance<br />

liquid chromatography. J Pharm Biomed Anal 45:769–774 (2007).<br />

13 Saracino MA, Amore M and Baioni E, Determination of selected<br />

phenothiazines in human plasma by solid-phase extraction and<br />

liquid chromatography with coulometric detection. Anal Chim Acta<br />

624:308–316 (2008).<br />

14 Mitrowska K, Posyniak A and Zmudzki J, Rapid method for the<br />

determination of tranquillizers and a beta-blocker in porcine<br />

and bovine kidney by liquid chromatography with tandem mass<br />

spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 637:185–192 (2009).<br />

15 Pujadas M, Pichini S and Civit E, A simple and reliable procedure<br />

for the determination of psychoactive drugs in oral fluid by<br />

gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal<br />

44:594–601 (2007).<br />

16 Wu HQ, Jin YC and Cai MZ, Simultaneous determination of 10 mental<br />

drugs by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Chin J Anal<br />

Chem 35:500–504 (2007).<br />

17 Zhang YL, Lu SX and Liu W, Preparation of anti-tetracycline antibodies<br />

and development of an indirect heterologous competitive enzymelinked<br />

immunosorbent assay to detect residues of tetracycline in<br />

milk. J Agric Food Chem 55:211–218 (2007).<br />

18 Lu SX, Zhang YL and Liu JT, Preparation of anti-pefloxacin antibody<br />

and development of an indirect competitive enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assay for detection of pefloxacin residue in chicken<br />

liver. J Agric Food Chem 54:6995–7000 (2006).<br />

19 Liu W, Zhao CB and Zhang YL, Preparation of polyclonal antibodies<br />

to a derivative of 1-aminohydantoin (AHD) and development of<br />

an indirect competitive ELISA for the detection of nitrofurantoin<br />

residue in water. J Agric Food Chem 55:6829–6834 (2007).<br />

20 Zhao CB, Liu W and Ling HL, Preparation of anti-gatifloxacin antibody<br />

and development of an indirect competitive enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assay for the detection of gatifloxacin residue<br />

in milk. J Agric Food Chem 55:6879–6884 (2007).<br />

21 Liu ZQ, Lu SX and Zhao CH, Preparation of anti-danofloxacin antibody<br />

and development of an indirect competitive enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assay for detection of danofloxacin residue in<br />

chicken liver. J Sci Food Agric 89:1115–1121 (2009).<br />

22 Ding K, Zhao CH and Cao ZZ, Chemiluminescent detection of<br />

gatifloxacin residue in milk. Anal Lett 42:505–518 (2009).<br />

23 Gajewski KG and Hsieh YHP, Monoclonal antibody specific to a major<br />

fish allergen: parvalbumin. J Food Prot 72:818–825 (2009).<br />

24 Stanker LH, Merrill P and Scotcher MC, Development and partial<br />

characterization of high-affinity monoclonal antibodies for<br />

botulinum toxin type A and their use in analysis of milk by sandwich<br />

ELISA. J Immunol Methods 336:1–8 (2008).<br />

25 Saravanan P, Sen A and Balamurugan V, Rapid quality control of a live<br />

attenuated Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) vaccine by monoclonal<br />

antibody based sandwich ELISA. Biologicals 36:1–6 (2008).<br />

26 Kim KH, Shim JH and Seo EH, Interleukin-32 monoclonal antibodies<br />

for immunohistochemistry, western blotting, and ELISA. J Immunol<br />

Methods 333:38–50 (2008).<br />

27 Cooper KM, Elliott CT and Kennedy DG, Detection of 3-amino-2oxazolidinone<br />

(AOZ), a tissue-bound metabolite of the nitrofuran<br />

furazolidone, in prawn tissue by enzyme immunoassay. Food Addit<br />

Contam 21:841–848 (2004).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1789–1795 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1795


1796<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 25 January 2010 Revised: 18 March 2010 Accepted: 16 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 22 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4015<br />

Comparison of PCR-DGGE and PCR-SSCP<br />

analysis for bacterial flora of Japanese<br />

traditional fermented fish products,<br />

aji-narezushi and iwashi-nukazuke<br />

Choa An, Hajime Takahashi, Bon Kimura and Takashi Kuda ∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: The bacterial flora of two Japanese traditional fermented fish products, aji-narezushi (salted and long-fermented<br />

horse mackerel (Trachurusjaponicas) with rice) and iwashi-nukazuke (salted and long-fermented sardine (Sardinopsmelanostica)<br />

with rice bran), was analysed using non-culture-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis<br />

(DGGE) and culture-based PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) methods.<br />

RESULTS: Viable plate counts in aji-narezushi and iwashi-nukazuke were about 6.3–6.6 and 5.7–6.9 log colony-forming units<br />

g −1 respectively. In the PCR-DGGE analysis, Lactobacillus acidipiscis was detected as the predominant bacterium in two of three<br />

aji-narezushi samples, while Lactobacillus versmoldensis was predominant in the third sample. By the PCR-SSCP method, Lb.<br />

acidipiscis and Lactobacillus plantarum were isolated as the predominant bacteria, while Lb. versmoldensis was not detected.<br />

The predominant bacterium in two of three iwashi-nukazuke samples was Tetragenococcus muriaticus, while Tetragenococcus<br />

halophilus was predominant in the third sample.<br />

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the detection of some predominant lactic acid bacteria species in fermented fish by<br />

cultivation methods is difficult.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: fermented fish; denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE); single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP);<br />

Lactobacillus; Tetragenococcus<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

In modern Japanese cuisine, sushi is made from vinegar-flavoured<br />

rice combined with seafood. It is thought that sushi originates<br />

from the salted and long-fermented fish called narezushi in Japan.<br />

The earliest reference to sushi appears in a code named the Yoro-<br />

Ritsuryo issued in AD 718, and this earliest sushi is postulated to<br />

have been narezushi. 1 Since that time, narezushi products have<br />

been made from various freshwater fish in several areas located<br />

inland rather than in coastal regions. Funazushi, a fermented<br />

crucian carp with cooked rice made near Lake Biwa in central Japan,<br />

is the most famous narezushi, characterised by its strong flavours<br />

and odours. Currently, narezushi is also made from marine fish.<br />

For example, aji-narezushi, made from horse mackerel (Trachurus<br />

japonicas) and rice, has been manufactured in the Noto peninsula<br />

in Ishikawa, Japan since the middle of the last century. 2<br />

Fish nukazuke, salted and long-fermented fish with rice bran<br />

(nuka, by-product of polished rice), is also one of the traditional<br />

and popular fermented fish products in Japan. Puffer fish ovary<br />

nukazuke is a famous nukazuke product, because its deadly poison<br />

is eliminated during long-term salting (2 years) and fermentation<br />

with rice bran (1–2 years). 3 However, iwashi-nukazuke, made<br />

from sardine (Sardinops melanostica), is the most reasonable and<br />

popular fish nukazuke. Recently, some bioactive substances such<br />

as antioxidants have been reported in iwashi-nukazuke. 4<br />

It is well known that lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in fermented<br />

foods affect not only product quality and preservation 5 but also<br />

food functionality, such as improving the intestinal environment<br />

and antihypertensive effects. 6,7 Recently, a high content of<br />

γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA) was detected in aji-narezushi. 2<br />

Production of GABA by LAB, including isolates from traditional<br />

fermented foods, has been reported. 8<br />

Determination of the microflora of aji-narezushi and iwashinukazuke<br />

using culture-based methods has been reported. 2,9<br />

During fermentation, LAB and lactic acid increase and the pH value<br />

decreases (to 4.2 or less). However, the microflora has not yet been<br />

clearly identified at the levels of genus and species. Owing to<br />

the known limitations of cultivation methods, many recent studies<br />

haveusedculture-independent16SrDNA-basedpolymerasechain<br />

reaction (PCR) techniques, including PCR denaturing gradient gel<br />

electrophoresis (DGGE), to determine the bacterial flora of various<br />

traditional fermented foods such as fermented milk and soybean<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Takashi Kuda, Department of Food Science and Technology,<br />

Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Minato-ku, Tokyo<br />

108-8477, Japan. E-mail: kuda@kaiyodai.ac.jp<br />

Department of Food Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Marine<br />

Science and Technology, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1796–1801 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Analysis of bacterial flora of traditional Japanese fermented fish products www.soci.org<br />

products. 10–12 In this study, to clarify the quality and functional<br />

properties of Japanese traditional products of lactic-fermented<br />

fish with rice, we investigated the bacterial flora using a molecular<br />

approach, combining PCR amplification of the V3 region of the<br />

16S rDNA gene and DGGE (PCR-DGGE). Furthermore, we identified<br />

the isolated strains using the culture-based PCR single-strand<br />

conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) method. 13<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Samples<br />

In order to carry out the study, aji-narezushi samples were obtained<br />

from three fish shops in Noto, Ishikawa, Japan in August 2008.<br />

During aji-narezushi processing, fresh horse mackerel (20–60 g<br />

body weight) were gutted and, after removal of the eyes or whole<br />

head, placed in a barrel with plenty of salt (180–330 g salt kg −1<br />

fish). The salted fish were then desalted in a vat filled with thin<br />

(diluted two to five times) rice vinegar (komesu, approximately<br />

45 g acetic acid L −1 ). The salting (from 3 days to several weeks)<br />

and desalting (from several seconds to 5 h) periods varied with<br />

each manufacturer. The treated fish were stuffed and covered<br />

with cooked rice, scattered with a small amount of Japanese<br />

pepper leaves and red pepper and pickled at ambient temperature<br />

(15–30 ◦ C). The fermentation time was about 2–3 months. During<br />

fermentation the lid of the fermenting barrel was kept closed by<br />

stone weights.<br />

Three iwashi-nukazuke samples were purchased from retail<br />

shops in Hakusan, Ishikawa, Japan in September 2008. During<br />

iwashi-nukazuke processing, fresh sardines (∼100 g body weight)<br />

were gutted and placed in a barrel with plenty of salt for several<br />

days. The salted fish were then washed and pickled in a barrel with<br />

plenty of nuka and moulted rice (koji) for about 1 year at ambient<br />

temperature.<br />

For microbiological analysis, some of the whole samples were<br />

separated and collected aseptically. Then the remaining samples<br />

were stored at −30 ◦ C for chemical analysis.<br />

Chemical analysis<br />

Moisture, salinity, pH and organic acids of the samples were<br />

determined using methods cited in our previous reports. 2,14 Water<br />

activitywas measured with a water activitymeter (Pawkit, Decagon<br />

Devices, Pullman, WA, USA).<br />

Viable plate count<br />

Samples (25 g) were emulsified in 225 mL of sterile phosphatebuffered<br />

saline (PBS; 20 mmol L −1 KH2PO4, 10 mmol L −1 K2HPO4,<br />

pH 7.2) and blended for 60 s (Stomacher 400, Seward, London,<br />

UK). The sample suspensions were diluted in PBS and appropriate<br />

dilutions were spread in duplicate on tryptone soy (TS) agar (Oxoid,<br />

Basingstoke, UK), Gifu anaerobic medium (GAM) agar (Nissui,<br />

Tokyo, Japan), de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar (Oxoid) and<br />

potato dextrose (PD) agar (Nissui) plates containing 100 mg L −1<br />

chloramphenicol. To detect halophilic and halotolerant bacteria,<br />

agar plates containing 100 g L −1 NaCl (TS-HS, GAM-HS, MRS-HS<br />

and PD-HS) were also used. TS and PD agar plates were incubated<br />

aerobically at 30 ◦ Cfor3days.GAMandMRSagarplateswere<br />

incubated anaerobically at 30 ◦ C for 5 days using an AnaeroPack<br />

system (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). All agar plates<br />

containing high salt (HS) were incubated for 7 days. In the case<br />

of aji-narezushi samples, ten colonies each from GAM and MRS<br />

agar plates were selected and restreaked for purification prior to<br />

PCR-SSCP analysis. In the case of iwashi-nukazuke the colonies<br />

were selected from GAM-HS and MRS-HS agar plates.<br />

Direct extraction of DNA and PCR amplification<br />

DNA from 1 mL of homogenate per sample and the isolates was<br />

extracted using a FastPure DNA kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan). Purified<br />

DNA was dissolved in ethylendiamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)<br />

buffer (TE buffer) and used as the DNA template in PCR.<br />

The following primer pair was chosen for amplification of the V3<br />

region of the 16S rRNA gene: forward primer with GC clamp GC-<br />

339f (5 ′ -CGC CCG CCG CGC CCC GCG CCC GTC CCG CCG CCC CCG<br />

CCC GCT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG-3 ′ ) and reverse primer V3-53r<br />

(5 ′ -GTA TTA CCG CGG CTG CTG G-3 ′ ). 15 This primer set has been<br />

widely used in DGGE analysis. 16 PCR amplification was performed<br />

in 100 µL reaction mixtures composed of 10 mmol L −1 Tris/HCl<br />

(pH 8.3), 50 mmol L −1 KCl, 1.5 mmol L −1 MgCl2, 50pmolofeach<br />

primer, 0.2 mmol L −1 each of four dNTPs, 2.5 U of Takara Taq DNA<br />

polymerase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) and 50 ng of template DNA.<br />

To minimise amplification of non-specific products and to obtain<br />

largeamountsofPCRproducts,‘touchdown’PCRwasperformed, 17<br />

where the initial annealing temperature was set at 8 ◦ C above the<br />

expected annealing temperature and decreased by 0.8 ◦ C every<br />

second cycle until the expected annealing temperature (62 ◦ C)<br />

was reached (total 20 cycles) and then five additional cycles were<br />

carried out. Amplification was carried out using the following<br />

cycle: denaturation at 94 ◦ C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s and primer<br />

extension at 72 ◦ C for 10 s in a GeneAmp 9700 thermal cycler<br />

(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Aliquots (5 µL) of<br />

PCR products were analysed first by electrophoresis on 20 g L −1<br />

agarose gels.<br />

DGGE analysis of PCR products<br />

DGGE analysis of PCR amplification products was performed as<br />

described previously 16 using a DCode System apparatus (Bio-Rad<br />

Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Polyacrylamide gels (80 g L −1<br />

acrylamide/bisacrylamide (37.5 : 1 w/w)) in 1× Tris/acetate/EDTA<br />

buffer with a denaturing gradient ranging from 30 to 60%<br />

denaturant (100% denaturation corresponds to 7 mol L −1 urea<br />

and 400 mL L −1 formamide) were prepared with a Bio-Rad 475<br />

gradient delivery system (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Polymerisation<br />

was achieved by adding 9 mL L −1 ammonium persulfate and<br />

0.9 mL L −1 N,N,N,N-tetramethyl ethylene diamine. The gels were<br />

electrophoresed at a constant voltage of 200 V at 60 ◦ Cfor3h.The<br />

DNA fragments were stained with ethidium bromide and washed<br />

with distilled water prior to UV transillumination.<br />

The main DGGE fragments were selected for nucleotide<br />

sequence determination. Each band was excised with a sterile<br />

razor. The DNA of each fragment was eluted in 50 µL ofTE<br />

buffer at 100 ◦ C for 10 min. The extracts were reamplified by<br />

PCR using the same primers and purified with SUPREC 138-PCR<br />

(Takara) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified<br />

DNA fragments were ligated in pT7 blue vectors (Novagen,<br />

Darmstadt, Germany) and transformed into Escherichia coli JM109.<br />

The transformants were grown on Luria-Bertani broth (LB) agar<br />

containing ampicillin and screened by β-galactosidase assay.<br />

Plasmid DNA of selected transformants was isolated using a<br />

Plasmid Miniprep kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The inserted DNA<br />

sequence, approximately 200 bp of 16S rDNA (E. coli position<br />

389–530), 18 was determined using an Applied Biosystems 3130<br />

genetic analyser with a Big Dye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing<br />

kit (Applied Biosystems). To identify the inserted sequences, the<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1796–1801 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1797


1798<br />

BLAST 2.0 algorithm was used to compare the derived sequence<br />

with 16S rDNA sequences in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ)<br />

database. The DGGE analysis was carried out duplicate.<br />

PCR-SSCP analysis of 16S rDNA V3 region<br />

In the PCR-SSCP analysis we used precast polyacrylamide gels<br />

followed by silver staining because of the high sensitivity of silver<br />

staining. This method visualises even a small amount of nonspecific<br />

amplification product; therefore several PCR primers and<br />

thermal profiles were tested for specificity and differences in PCR<br />

efficiency. The primer set, SRV3-1 (5 ′ -CGG YCC AGA CTC CTA CGG<br />

G-3 ′ ) as the forward primer and V3R53 (5 ′ -GTA TTA CCG CGG<br />

CTG CTG GC-3 ′ ), which was designed based on 536R with minor<br />

modifications, as the reverse primer, gave acceptable results. 19,20<br />

PCR amplification was performed in 100 µL reaction mixtures<br />

composed of 10 mmol L −1 Tris/HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mmol L −1 KCl,<br />

1.5 mmol L −1 MgCl2, 50 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mmol L −1 each<br />

of four dNTPs, 2.5 U of Takara Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio) and<br />

50 ng of template DNA. In this analysis, ‘touchdown’ PCR was also<br />

performed, where the initial annealing temperature was set at 6 ◦ C<br />

above the target annealing temperature and decreased by 0.6 ◦ C<br />

every second cycle until the target annealing temperature (61 ◦ C)<br />

was reached and then five additional cycles were carried out at<br />

the target annealing temperature. Amplifications were carried out<br />

in a GeneAmp 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems) using the<br />

following cycle: denaturation at 94 ◦ C for 30 s, annealing in the<br />

temperature regime describedabove for 30 s andprimer extension<br />

at 72 ◦ C for 10 s for ‘touchdown’ cycles and 72 ◦ C for 30 s for the<br />

last five additional cycles.<br />

SSCP analysis of PCR products was performed as described<br />

previously. 21 Briefly, PCR products were mixed 1 : 2 with load-<br />

Table 1. Chemical compounds in lactic-fermented fish products<br />

www.soci.org C An et al.<br />

ing buffer (980 mL L −1 formamide/10 mmol L −1 EDTA/5 mL L −1<br />

bromophenol blue), denatured by heating for 10 min at 100 ◦ C,<br />

cooled on ice, loaded on a precast, ready-to-use gel (GeneGel<br />

Excel 12.5/24 kit, GE Healthcare, UK) and electrophoresed in a<br />

GenePhor electrophoresis unit (GE Healthcare) at 650 V, 25 mA<br />

and 5 ◦ C until the bromophenol blue front reached the anode<br />

buffer strip (∼90 min). The gel was stained with a PlusOne DNA<br />

silver staining kit (GE Healthcare). Scanned photographs of SSCP<br />

gels were stored as TIFF images.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Chemical compounds<br />

Table 1 shows the chemical constituents of the fermented fish<br />

products. The salinities of aji-narezushi and iwashi-nukazuke were<br />

moderately high, about 60 and 100–160 g kg −1 respectively, while<br />

their respective water activities were about 0.89 and 0.77. The<br />

predominant organic acid in all samples was lactic acid, with<br />

other organic acids present only at very low levels. The lactic acid<br />

content was particularly high (>60 g kg −1 )inoneaji-narezushi<br />

sample (As-1). The pH of aji-narezushi was lower than 4.3. These<br />

results agree with our previous reports. 2,9,14,22<br />

Viable plate count<br />

The viable plate counts of the fermented fish products are<br />

summarisedinTable2.Intheaji-narezushi samples, maximum<br />

viable plate counts were 6.5–7.4 log colony-forming units (CFU)<br />

g −1 . The viable plate count was lowered by HS. In one aji-narezushi<br />

sample (As-1), viable cells were not detected on TS and TS-HS agar<br />

plates. It is considered that a richer nutrient condition is required<br />

Organic acids (g kg −1 )<br />

Fermented Moisture Salinity Water<br />

fish product Sample (g kg −1 ) (gkg −1 ) activity pH Lactic acid Acetic acid Total<br />

Aji-narezushi As-1 603 58 0.87 3.89 63.7 2.3 66.1<br />

As-2 601 57 0.89 4.28 23.7 2.5 26.2<br />

As-3 662 62 0.90 4.27 25.7 2.2 27.8<br />

Iwashi-nukazuke In-1 NT 126 0.78 5.08 18.6 2.1 20.7<br />

In-2 NT 157 0.75 4.95 16.0 1.0 17.0<br />

In-3 NT 105 NT 5.07 7.6 2.1 9.7<br />

NT, not tested.<br />

Table 2. Plate counts in lactic-fermented fish products<br />

Plate count (log CFU g−1 )<br />

Fermented<br />

fish product Sample TS TS-HS GAM GAM-HS MRS MRS-HS PD PD-HS<br />

Aji-narezushi As-1 ND ND 6.34 ND 6.52 3.49 3.51 3.36<br />

As-2 7.34 5.00 6.77 5.45 6.64 3.56 3.53 3.11<br />

As-3 6.38 6.08 6.46 5.20 6.28 4.91 4.18 3.86<br />

Iwashi-nukazuke In-1 5.52 5.26 ND 5.62 5.68 5.59 5.64 5.45<br />

In-2 4.60 ND 4.72 ND 6.28 6.60 4.61 6.66<br />

In-3 3.34 5.81 3.80 5.38 ND 6.91 3.15 4.32<br />

TS, tryptone soy agar; GAM, Gifu anaerobic medium agar; MRS, de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar; PD, potato dextrose agar; HS, high salt (containing<br />

100 g L −1 NaCl); ND, not detected (


Analysis of bacterial flora of traditional Japanese fermented fish products www.soci.org<br />

1<br />

As-1 As-2 As-3 In-1 In-2 In-3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

Figure 1. DGGE analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA fragments from ajinarezushi<br />

(As-1–As-3) and iwashi-nukazuke (In-1–In-3).<br />

for the predominant bacteria. The viable counts for yeasts on PD<br />

and PD-HS agar plates were 3.1–4.2 log CFU g −1 .<br />

Maximum viable counts of the iwashi-nukazuke samples were<br />

5–6 log CFU g −1 . The microbial count of fish nukazuke varies<br />

depending on the manufacturer. 22 In samples In-1 and In-3 the<br />

counts on the agar plates containing HS were similar to or higher<br />

than those on the agar plates with no added salt. Previous reports<br />

indicate that the predominant bacteria in fish nukazuke products<br />

are Tetragenoccocus spp. 9 However, no micro-organisms were<br />

detected in sample In-2 on TS-HS and GAM-HS agar plates, though<br />

the viable counts were high on MRS-HS and PD-HS agar plates.<br />

Bacterial flora analysed by PCR-DGGE method<br />

For DGGE analysis we selected the V3 region of 16S rDNA as the<br />

target region. This region has been widely used in the analysis of<br />

bacterial communities or the identification of isolated bacteria. 11,23<br />

PCR products originating from sample preparations were divided<br />

into one to four main fragments by DGGE analysis (Fig. 1), with the<br />

banding patterns differing by sample. Subsequently, to identify<br />

the main bands, each band was recovered from the DGGE gel<br />

and sequenced. The results obtained from clone sequencing are<br />

shown in Table 3.<br />

Inthecaseofaji-narezushi, there was only one main band for<br />

sample As-1, which differed from the main bands of the other two<br />

samples. Sequencing of the recovered DGGE gels indicated that<br />

the predominant bacteria in sample As-1 and samples As-2 and<br />

As-3 were Lactobacillus versmoldensis and Lactobacillus acidipiscis<br />

respectively. Lactobacillus versmoldensis frequently dominates the<br />

LAB populations of raw fermented sausage products, 24 while Lb.<br />

acidipiscis is isolated from fermented fish products (pla-ra and<br />

pla-chom) made in Thailand. 25 The difference in predominant LAB<br />

species may be correlated with the difference in TS agar plate<br />

counts of the samples (Table 2).<br />

The DGGE patterns of the iwashi-nukazuke samples indicated<br />

that the predominant bacterium in sample In-1 was Tetragenococcus<br />

muriaticus, while the main band of sample In-2 was identified<br />

as the chloroplast of rice (Oryza sativa). Interestingly, sample In-3<br />

showed two main bands corresponding to those of both samples<br />

In-1 and In-2.<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

Table 3. Identities of cloned fragments obtained from DGGE analysis<br />

of aji-narezushi and iwashi-nukazuke<br />

Sample DGGE no. a Identification b<br />

Identity<br />

(%)<br />

Aji-narezushi<br />

As-1 1 Lactobacillus versmoldensis 96<br />

As-2 2 Lactobacillus acidipiscis 97<br />

3 Lactobacillus acidipiscis 98<br />

4 Lactobacillus acidipiscis 98<br />

As-3 5 Lactobacillus acidipiscis 97<br />

6 Lactobacillus acidipiscis 98<br />

7 Lactobacillus acidipiscis 98<br />

Iwashi-nukazuke<br />

In-1 8 Tetragenococcus muriaticus 92<br />

9 Tetragenococcus muriaticus 99<br />

10 Tetragenococcus muriaticus 95<br />

11 Oryza sativa 100<br />

In-2 12 Oryza sativa 100<br />

In-3 13 Tetragenococcus muriaticus 95<br />

14 Oryza sativa 100<br />

a See Fig. 1.<br />

b The main bands are shown in bold type.<br />

Tetragenococcus muriaticus, a moderately halophilic LAB, is<br />

isolated from salted and fermented fish products along with<br />

Tetragenococcus halophilus. 26 Although T. muriaticus is reported<br />

to be a histamine-forming bacterium, 27 Satomi et al. 28 found that<br />

the histidine decarboxylase gene (hdc) is encoded in the plasmid<br />

of T. halophilus and suggested that the hdc could be encoded on<br />

transformable elements among LAB.<br />

In samples In-2 and In-3 a clear band of rice chloroplast was<br />

detected. In a previous DGGE analysis of fermented plant foods<br />

the chloroplast was detected as the main band in the early<br />

fermentation stage. 29 Ward et al. 30 also successfully differentiated<br />

Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris based<br />

on 16S rRNA sequencing, but Ercolini et al. 31 could not use the<br />

V3 region from 16S rDNA to identify these two subspecies of<br />

Lc. lactis. Furthermore, Walter et al. 32 also failed to distinguish<br />

Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus using DGGE or<br />

BLAST comparisons of V2–V3 sequences. The authors suggested<br />

that differentiation of these species might be possible by using<br />

primers targeting other regions of 16S rRNA. We also think<br />

that further DGGE experiments using other regions or LABspecific<br />

regions to clarify the LAB flora, particularly halophilic<br />

or halotolerant LAB, of fermented fish are necessary.<br />

Bacterial flora analysed by PCR-SSCP method<br />

PCR-SSCP analysis enables DNA fragments of similar sizes to be<br />

separated according to their configuration (secondarystructure). 33<br />

Targeting the 16S rRNA V3 region, which permits phylogenetic<br />

discrimination of microbial species, allows for LAB monitoring in<br />

the fermented food microbial community by one profile of bands,<br />

where each band corresponds to a different sequence of the 16S<br />

rRNA V3 region, i.e. one bacterium. 13<br />

As shown in the PCR-DGGE analysis, the predominant bacteria<br />

in the fermented fish products were LAB. Therefore we isolated<br />

bacterial strains from MRS and GAM agars for aji-narezushi and<br />

from MRS-HS and GAM-HS agars for iwashi-nukazuke for the PCR-<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1796–1801 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1799


1800<br />

Table 4. Results of PCR-SSCP analysis and identification of 16S rDNA<br />

sequencing of aji-narezushi and iwashi-nukazuke<br />

Sample Medium<br />

No. of<br />

isolates<br />

Identification of 16S<br />

rDNA sequencing<br />

Aji-narezushi<br />

As-1 MRS 7 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

MRS 2 Lactobacillus acidipiscis<br />

MRS 1 Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

GAM 2 Lactobacillus paralimentarius<br />

GAM 7 Lactobacillus acidipiscis<br />

GAM 1 Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

As-2 MRS 8 Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

MRS 2 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

GAM 3 Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

GAM 7 Lactobacillus acidipiscis<br />

As-3 MRS 10 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

GAM 2 Lactobacillus casei<br />

GAM 7 Lactobacillus acidipiscis<br />

GAM 1 Tetragenococcus halophilus<br />

Iwashi-nukazuke<br />

In-1 MRS-HS 10 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

GAM-HS 10 Tetragenococcus muriaticus<br />

In-2 MRS-HS 10 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

GAM-HS 10 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

In-3 MRS-HS 10 Not amplified (yeasts)<br />

GAM-HS 8 Tetragenococcus halophilus<br />

GAM-HS 2 Tetragenococcus muriaticus<br />

MRS, de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar; GAM, Gifu anaerobic medium<br />

agar; HS, high salt (containing 100 g L −1 NaCl).<br />

SSCP analysis. These agar plates were incubated under anaerobic<br />

conditions.<br />

As summarised in Table 4, the V3 region of some isolates from<br />

MRS agar plates was not amplified. Although MRS agar is regarded<br />

as a medium for LAB, the cells of the isolates were observed as<br />

oval yeast shapes under a microscope. Particularly in the iwashinukazuke<br />

samples, all isolates from MRS-HS agar were yeasts.<br />

The diversity of bacterial flora was not very high in the ajinarezushi<br />

samples. The predominant LAB isolated from all three<br />

samples using GAM agar plates was Lb. acidipiscis. In the case<br />

of samples As-2 and As-3, Lb. acidipiscis was also detected<br />

as predominant by the non-culture-based PCR-DGGE analysis<br />

(Table 3). On the other hand, Lb. versmoldensis, which was shown<br />

to be predominant in sample As-1 by the PCR-DGGE analysis, was<br />

not detected by the PCR-SSCP method. Kröckel et al. 24 reported<br />

that Lb. versmoldensis grows better in MRS broth than on MRS agar<br />

and that its colonies on MRS agar are small. Furthermore, a lag<br />

phase of up to 4 days could be observed when it was transferred<br />

from MRS agar to MRS broth. 24 It is considered that the growth<br />

rate of Lb. versmoldensis is slower than that of other LAB such as Lb.<br />

acidipiscis. These results suggest that isolation of Lb. versmoldensis<br />

under cultivation method conditions is difficult and the population<br />

of Lb. versmoldensis was not reflected in the viable cell counts in<br />

Table 2.<br />

Lactobacillus plantarum was detected in samples As-1 and As-2,<br />

though this bacterium was not detected by the PCR-DGGE analysis.<br />

The composition of GAM agar, which contains liver extract, may<br />

be suitable for growth of Lb. plantarum. Lactobacillus plantarum<br />

is isolated not only from fermented vegetables but also from<br />

www.soci.org C An et al.<br />

fermented meat and fish. 14 Furthermore, it is well known that<br />

Lb. plantarum has beneficial activities in fermented foods, such<br />

as high lactic acid production, acid tolerance and bacteriocin<br />

production. 14 Other LAB species, Lb. casei and T. halophilus, were<br />

isolated from sample As-3.<br />

In iwashi-nukazuke sample In-1 the predominant bacterium was<br />

identified as T. muriaticus, while no bacterial colony was detected<br />

in sample In-2. These results are in agreement with those of the<br />

PCR-DGGE analysis (Table 3). However, in the case of sample In-3<br />

the predominant isolate was identified as T. halophillus, which was<br />

not detected by the PCR-DGGE analysis.<br />

As reported above, different results were obtained from the<br />

non-culture-based PCR-DGGE method and the culture-based PCR-<br />

SSCP method. It is considered that the PCR-DGGE method is more<br />

useful than the PCR-SSCP method to determine the predominant<br />

bacteria and check the growth of starter strains. However, a greater<br />

variety of microflora was expressed in the PCR-SSCP method than<br />

in the PCR-DGGE method. The non-bacterial (rice chloroplast)<br />

band in the PCR-DGGE analysis may hide the bacterial band.<br />

Therefore further study of the PCR-DGGE analysis using the V3 and<br />

other LAB-specific regions is necessary. Furthermore, biochemical<br />

investigation of the LAB strains isolated from aji-narezushi and<br />

iwashi-nukazuke is now in progress.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

We studied the bacterial flora of traditional fermented fish<br />

products, aji-narezushi and iwashi-nukazuke, using non-culturebased<br />

PCR-DGGE and culture-based PCR-SSCP methods. In the<br />

PCR-DGGE analysis, Lb. acidipiscis and Lb. versmoldenis were<br />

detected as the predominant bacteria in aji-narezushi. However,<br />

Lb. versmoldensis could not be isolated using GAM and MRS agars.<br />

The PCR-DGGE analysis showed that the predominant bacterium<br />

in iwashi-nukazuke was T. muriaticus rather than T. halophilus.<br />

Some of our results differed from those of previous studies using<br />

cultivation methods. Further studies on the detection, isolation<br />

and biochemical and fermentation properties of LAB, particularly<br />

Lb. versmoldensis,inaji-narezushi are necessary.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

ThisstudywassupportedbyafundfromtheMinistryofAgriculture,<br />

Forestry and Fisheries for research and development projects<br />

promoting the new policies of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries<br />

(No. 2041).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 IchishimaE, Invitation to Fermented Foods [Hakkou Shokuhin eno<br />

Shotai]. Shokabo, Tokyo, pp. 36–39 (2004). (in Japanese).<br />

2 KudaT,TanibeR,MoriM,TakeH,MichihataT,YanoT,et al, Microbial<br />

and chemical properties of aji-no-susu, a traditional fermented<br />

fish with rice product in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. Fish Sci<br />

75:1499–1506 (2009).<br />

3 Kobayashi T, Kimura B and Fujii T, Differentiation of Tetragenococcus<br />

populations occurring in products and manufacturing processes<br />

of puffer fish ovaries fermented with rice-bran. Int J Food Microbiol<br />

56:211–218 (2000).<br />

4 Chang CM, Ohshima T and Koizumi C, Changes in composition of<br />

lipids, free amino acids and organic acids in rice-bran-fermented<br />

sardine (Etrumes teres) during processing and subsequent storage.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 59:521–528 (1992).<br />

5 Riebroy S, Benjakul S and Viessanguan W, Properties and acceptability<br />

of Som-fug, a Thai fermented fish mince, inoculated with lactic acid<br />

bacteria starters. LWT – Food Sci Technol 41:569–580 (2008).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1796–1801


Analysis of bacterial flora of traditional Japanese fermented fish products www.soci.org<br />

6 Vinderola G, Capellini B, Villarreal F, Suárez V, Quiberoni A and<br />

Reinheimer J, Usefulness of a set of simple in vitro tests for the<br />

screening and identification of probiotic candidate strains for dairy<br />

use. LWT – Food Sci Technol 41:1678–1688 (2008).<br />

7 Kilpi EER, Kahara MM, Steele JL, Philanto AM and Joutsjoki VV,<br />

Angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory activity in milk<br />

fermented by wild-type and peptidase-deletion derivatives of<br />

Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32. Int Dairy J 17:976–984 (2007).<br />

8 Komatsuzaki N, Shima J, Kawamoto S, Momose H and Kimura T,<br />

Production of γ -aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus<br />

paracasei isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Microbiol<br />

22:497–504 (2005).<br />

9 Kuda T, Mihara T and Yano T, Detection of histamine and histaminerelated<br />

bacteria in fish nukazuke, a salted and fermented fish with<br />

rice-bran, by simple colorimetric microplate assay. Food Control<br />

18:677–681 (2007).<br />

10 Singh S, Goswami P, Singh R and Heller KJ, Application of molecular<br />

identification tools for Lactobacillus, with a focus on discrimination<br />

between closely related species. LWT – FoodSciTechnol 42:448–457<br />

(2009).<br />

11 Chen HC, Wang SY and Chen MJ, Microbiological study of lactic<br />

acid bacteria in kefir grains by culture-dependent and cultureindependent<br />

methods. Food Microbiol 25:492–501 (2008).<br />

12 Kim TW, Lee JH, Kim SE, Park MH, Chang HC and Kim HY, Analysis of<br />

microbial communities in doenjang, a Korean fermented soybean<br />

paste, using nested PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.<br />

Int J Food Microbiol 131:265–271 (2009).<br />

13 Chamkha M, Sayadi S, Bru V and Godon JJ, Microbial diversity in<br />

Tunisian olive fermentation brine as evaluated by small subunit<br />

rRNA-single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Int J Food<br />

Microbiol 122:211–215 (2008).<br />

14 Kuda T, Kaneko N, Yano T and Mori M, Induction of superoxide anion<br />

radical scavenging capacity in Japanese white radish juice and<br />

milk by Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from aji-narezushi and<br />

kaburazushi Food Chem 120:517–522 (2010).<br />

15 Sheffield VC, Cox DR, Lerman LS and Myers RM, Attachment of a<br />

40-base-pair G+C-rich sequence (GC-clamp) to genomic DNA<br />

fragments by the polymerase chain reaction results in improved<br />

detectionofsingle-basechanges.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA86:232–236<br />

(1998).<br />

16 Muyzer G, De Waal EC and Uitterlinden AG, Profiling of complex<br />

microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis<br />

analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes for 16S rRNA.<br />

Appl Environ Microbiol 59:695–700 (1993).<br />

17 Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K and Mattick JS, ‘Touchdown’<br />

PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification.<br />

Nucleic Acids Res 19:4008 (1991).<br />

18 Neefs JM, Hendriks Van de Peer YL and Wachter RD, Compilation<br />

of small ribosomal subunit RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res<br />

18:2237–2317 (1990).<br />

19 Lee DH, Zo YG and Kim SJ, Nonradioactive method to study genetic<br />

profiles of natural bacterial communities by PCR-single-strandconformation<br />

polymorphism. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:697–703<br />

(1996).<br />

20 Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA and Lane DJ, 16S ribosomal<br />

DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703<br />

(1991).<br />

21 Takahashi H, Kimura B, Yoshikawa M, Gotou S, Watanabe I and Fujii T,<br />

Direct detection and identification of lactic acid bacteria in a food<br />

processing plant and in meat products using denaturing gradient<br />

gel electrophoresis. J Food Protect 67:2515–2520 (2004).<br />

22 Kuda T, Miyamoto H, Sakajiri M, Ando K and Yano T, Microflora of<br />

fish nukazuke made in Ishikawa, Japan. NipponSuisanGakkaishi<br />

67:296–301 (2001).<br />

23 Ercolini D, Moschetti G, Blaiotta G and Coppola S, Behavior of variable<br />

V3 region from 16S rDNA of lactic acid bacteria in denaturing<br />

gradient gel electrophoresis. Curr Microbiol 42:199–202 (2001).<br />

24 Kröckel L, Schillinger U, Franz CMAP, Bantleon A and Ludwig W,<br />

Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov., isolated from raw fermented<br />

sausage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:513–517 (2003).<br />

25 Tanasupawt S, Shida O, Okada S and Komagata K, Lactobacillus<br />

acidipiscis sp.nov.andWeissella thailandensis sp. nov., isolated from<br />

fermented fish in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:1479–1485<br />

(2000).<br />

26 Satomi M, Kimura B, Mizoi M, Sato T and Fujii T, Tetragenococcus<br />

muriaticus sp. nov., a new moderately halophilic lactic acid<br />

bacterium isolated from fermented squid liver sauce. Int J Syst<br />

Bacteriol 47:832–836 (1997).<br />

27 Kimura B, Konagaya Y and Fujii T, Histamine formation by<br />

Tetragenococcus muriaticus, a halophilic lactic acid bacterium<br />

isolated from fish sauce. Int J Food Microbiol 70:71–77 (2001).<br />

28 Satomi M,Furushita M,Oikawa H,Yoshikawa-Takahashi M and Yano Y,<br />

Analysis of a 30 kbp plasmid encoding histidine decarboxylase gene<br />

in Tetragenococcus halophilus isolated from fish sauce. Int J Food<br />

Microbiol 15:202–209 (2008).<br />

29 Nakayama J, Hoshiko H, Fukuda M, Tanaka H, Sakamoto N, Tanaka S,<br />

et al, Molecular monitoring of bacterial community structure<br />

in long-aged nukadoko: pickling bed of fermented rice<br />

bran dominated by slow-growing lactobacilli. J Biosci Bioeng<br />

104:481–489 (2007).<br />

30 Ward LJH, Brown JCS and Davey GP, Two methods for the genetic<br />

differentiation of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis and cremoris based<br />

on differences in the 16S rRNA gene sequence. FEMS Microbiol Lett<br />

166:15–20 (1998).<br />

31 Ercolini DP, Hill J and Dodd CER, Bacterial community structure and<br />

location in Stilton cheese. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3540–3548<br />

(2003).<br />

32 Walter J, Tannock GW, Tilsala-Timisjarvi A, Rodtong S, Loach DM,<br />

Munro K, et al, Detection and identification of gastrointestinal<br />

Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel<br />

electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Appl Environ<br />

Microbiol 66:2418–2423 (2000).<br />

33 Hebenbrock K, Williams MP and Karger LB, Single-strand conformation<br />

polymorphism using capillary electrophoresis with<br />

two-dye laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis<br />

16:1429–1436 (1995).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1796–1801 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1801


1802<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 23 February 2010 Revised: 19 April 2010 Accepted: 23 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 14 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4017<br />

Identification of ferulate oligomers from corn<br />

stover<br />

Diane Dobberstein a and Mirko Bunzel b∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Cross-links between plant cell wall polymers negatively impact forage digestibility. Hydroxycinnamates and<br />

their oligomers act as cross-links between polysaccharides and/or polysaccharides and lignin. Higher ferulate oligomers such as<br />

dehydrotrimers were identified in cereal grains but not in vegetative organs of grasses. The aim of this study was to characterize<br />

ester-linked hydroxycinnamate oligomers from corn stover with special emphasis on ferulate dehydrotrimers.<br />

RESULTS: With the exception of the 4-O-5-dehydrodiferulic acid all known ferulate dehydrodimers, including the recently<br />

described 8-8(tetrahydrofuran) dimer, were identified in the alkaline hydrolyzate of corn stover after chromatographic<br />

fractionation. Next to dehydrodimers, 18 cyclobutane dimers made up of ferulic acid and/or p-coumaric acid were identified<br />

by GC-MS of the dimeric size exclusion chromatography fraction. Ferulate dehydrotrimers were isolated by using multiple<br />

chromatographic procedures and identified by UV spectroscopy, MS and NMR. Four trimers were unambiguously identified<br />

as 5-5/8-O-4-, 8-O-4/8-O-4-, 8-8(aryltetralin)/8-O-4-, and 8-O-4/8-5-dehydrotriferulic acids, a fifth tentatively as 8-5/5-5dehydrotriferulic<br />

acid.<br />

CONCLUSION: The formation of ferulate dehydrotrimers is not limited to reproductive organs of grasses but also contribute to<br />

network formation in the cell walls of vegetative organs. Although radically coupled hydroxycinnamate dimers and oligomers<br />

were in the focus of researchers over the last decade, the earlier described cyclobutane dimers significantly contribute to cell<br />

wall cross-linking.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: ferulic acid; p-coumaric acid; dehydrotrimer; dehydrotriferulic acid; cyclobutane dimers; forage digestibility<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Forage digestibility and hence quality is widely controlled by<br />

the cell walls in the plant organs. Structural and matrix polysaccharides,<br />

lignin, and proteins are the major constituents of the<br />

walls. Cell wall composition and interactions between cell wall<br />

polymers mediated by, for example, polysaccharide or polysaccharide–lignin<br />

cross-links are important factors limiting their<br />

digestibility. 1–6 In grasses, hydroxycinnamates, particularly ferulate<br />

and p-coumarate, are minor constituents of the cell wall. While<br />

p-coumarates are mostly bound to lignin 7 and only to a lesser degree<br />

to arabinoxylans, 8,9 ferulates are primarily acylating the O-5<br />

position of arabinose side-chains in arabinoxylans. 10 Radical- and<br />

light-induced coupling reactions of esterified ferulates lead to the<br />

formation of dimeric ferulate cross-links between cell wall arabinoxylans.<br />

These dimers are known as dehydrodiferulates (radical<br />

coupling) or cyclobutane ferulate dimers (light-induced coupling).<br />

More recently, dehydrotriferulates and dehydrotetraferulates were<br />

isolated from corn bran. 11 – 15 Theoretically, these compounds can<br />

cross-link up to four polysaccharide chains forming a strong<br />

network in the cell wall. Ferulates can also cross-couple with<br />

monolignols. 16,17 Thus, they are co-polymerized into lignins 18,19<br />

and cross-link arabinoxylans with lignins. Although radicals can<br />

easily be generated from p-coumarate, radically formed dimers<br />

of p-coumarates have not been identified from plant materials.<br />

Radical transfer reactions with other phenolics in the cell wall<br />

are discussed to explain these findings. 20 Cyclobutane dimers<br />

of p-coumarates and mixed cyclobutane dimers of ferulates and<br />

p-coumarates, however, were identified in different grasses. 21 – 23<br />

As these compounds are formed by a photochemical mechanism<br />

the formation of the cyclobutane dimers requires sunlight during<br />

plant growth. The formation of these compounds is therefore<br />

supposed to vary strongly depending on the localization of the<br />

considered organ or tissue in the plant.<br />

While ferulate oligomers such as trimers were isolated form<br />

corn bran they were not yet identified in vegetative organs, e.g.<br />

stems or leaves, widely used as forages. The aim of this study<br />

was to demonstrate that ferulate oligomers, especially ferulate<br />

trimers, are not exclusively involved in cell wall cross-linking of<br />

reproductive organs but also occur in vegetative organs, thus<br />

having a potential influence on forage digestibility.<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Mirko Bunzel, Department of Food Science and Nutrition,<br />

University of Minnesota, 1334 Eckles Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.<br />

E-mail: mbunzel@umn.edu<br />

a Department of Biochemistry and Food Chemistry, University of Hamburg,<br />

Grindelallee 117, 20146 Hamburg, Germany<br />

b DepartmentofFoodScienceandNutrition,UniversityofMinnesota,1334Eckles<br />

Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Ferulate oligomers from corn stover www.soci.org<br />

mV<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

B1<br />

B2<br />

B3 B4<br />

0<br />

200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380<br />

Figure 1. Separation of alkali-extracted hydroxycinnamate derivatives/oligomers from corn stover by size exclusion chromatography (detection at<br />

325 nm).<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

General<br />

Alcalase 2.4 L (EC 3.4.21.62, from Bacillus licheniformis, 2.4 AU<br />

g −1 ) was kindly donated by Novo Nordisk (Bagsvaerd, Denmark).<br />

Bio-Beads S-X3 was from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Munich,<br />

Germany), the solvent resistant BioBeads size exclusion chromatography<br />

(SEC) glass column ECOPLUS from Kronlab (Sinsheim,<br />

Germany). Sephadex LH-20 was from Amersham Pharmacia<br />

Biotech (Freiburg, Germany). SEC and Sephadex LH-20 chromatography<br />

instrumentation (L-6000 pump, L-7400 UV detector)<br />

was from Merck/Hitachi (Darmstadt, Germany). Phenyl-hexyl<br />

HPLC-columns were purchased from phenomenex (Aschaffenburg,<br />

Germany). Phenyl-hexyl-RP-HPLC was carried out using<br />

either of the following instrumentations: L-6200 intelligent pump,<br />

T-6300 column thermostat, L-7400 UV detector or L-7150 intelligent<br />

pump, L-7300 column oven, L-7455 photodiode array<br />

detector (Merck/Hitachi, Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC-MS instrumentation<br />

was from Hewlett-Packard (Waldbronn, Germany): HP<br />

Series 1100: autosampler G1313, pump G 1312A, mass spectrometer<br />

G 1946A, photodiode array detector 1314A. Nuclear<br />

magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were performed on a<br />

Bruker DRX-500 (Rheinstetten, Germany) instrument. Gas chromatography–mass<br />

spectroscopy (GC-MS) was carried out on a<br />

Trace 2000 GC coupled to a PolarisQ ion trap mass spectrometer<br />

(ThermoQuest, Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany) using a<br />

HP-5-MS fused-silica capillary column (Hewlett-Packard).<br />

Plant material and sample preparation<br />

Seeds (DK 233) were made available by Monsanto Agrar<br />

Deutschland GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany). The plant material<br />

was provided by Professor F. Schwarz and Dr F. Zeller from the<br />

Technical University of Munich, Department of Animal Nutrition.<br />

The plant material was seeded on 28 April 2004 in a field trial<br />

in Freising, Germany, and harvested on 27 September 2004. The<br />

dry matter content of the grains at the time of harvest was<br />

640 g kg −1 , representing a typical maturity stage used for the<br />

production of silage. The duration of sunshine from sowing to<br />

harvest was calculated as 1226 h. Immediately after harvesting,<br />

the cob was removed, and the corn stover was coarsely chopped,<br />

freeze-dried, and stepwise ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. Dried<br />

material (280 g) was washed five times with water (3 L each,<br />

stirring for 10 min) followed by centrifugation. The residue was<br />

consecutively extracted in a Soxhlet apparatus for 8 h with ethanol<br />

and 6 h with acetone followed by a drying step. Residual material<br />

(200 g) was suspended in a phosphate buffer pH 7.5, and proteins<br />

min<br />

were partially degraded by using the protease alcalase (30 µL<br />

enzyme g −1 dry material, 30 min at 60 ◦ C, continuous agitation).<br />

The residue was centrifuged, washed with hot water, 95% (v/v)<br />

ethanol, and acetone, and dried.<br />

Alkaline hydrolysis and extraction<br />

Alkaline hydrolysis and extraction was performed according to<br />

a previously described procedure. 12 In brief, extracted and dried<br />

stover (165 g) was saponified (NaOH (2 mol L −1 ); 20 mL NaOH g −1<br />

stover) under nitrogen, protected from light and under continuous<br />

stirring for 18 h. Following acidification of the mixture (pH <<br />

2), liberated phenolic acids were extracted into diethyl ether.<br />

Ether extracts were extracted with NaHCO3 solution (50 g L −1 ).<br />

After acidification (pH < 2) of the combined aqueous layers the<br />

phenolic acids were re-extracted into diethyl ether. Ether extracts<br />

were dried over Na2SO4, evaporated to dryness and re-dissolved<br />

in tetrahydrofuran (10 mL).<br />

Fractionation of phenolic acids<br />

SEC was carried out by using Bio-Beads S-X3 (gel bed: 1.5 cm ×<br />

95 cm) swollen in tetrahydrofuran which was also used as mobile<br />

phase. Hydrolyzate dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (about 200 mg in<br />

500 µL) was applied to the column. The flow rate was maintained<br />

at 0.25 mL min −1 for 360 min, increased to 0.5 mL min −1 between<br />

360 and 395 min and further increased to 0.75 mL min −1 until all<br />

material was eluted. Fractions were collected according to the<br />

chromatogram monitored at 325 nm (Fig. 1). Fractions B2 and B3<br />

from 20 runs were pooled, dried under a stream of nitrogen, redissolved<br />

in methanol (MeOH)/water 50/50 (v/v) (ultrasonic bath,<br />

addition of a few drops acetone to improve solubility), and used<br />

for Sephadex LH-20 chromatography.<br />

Sephadex LH-20 chromatography was performed as described<br />

previously 11 with some minor modifications. Fraction B2 (386 mg)<br />

was separated in two Sephadex runs whereas only a portion<br />

of fraction B3 (875 mg) was separated in a single run. In brief,<br />

the sample was applied to the column (gel bed: 2.5 cm ×<br />

85 cm) pre-conditioned with aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)<br />

(0.5 mmol L −1 )/MeOH 95/5 (v/v). Elution was carried out as follows:<br />

(1) elution with TFA (0.5 mmol L −1 )/MeOH 95/5 (v/v) for 72 h, flow<br />

rate: 1.5 mL min −1 ; (2) elution with TFA (0.5 mmol L −1 ))/MeOH<br />

50/50 (v/v) for 72 h, flow rate: 1.0 mL min −1 ;(3)elutionwithTFA<br />

(0.5 mmol L −1 )/MeOH 40/60 (v/v) for 65 h, flow rate: 1.0 mL min −1 ;<br />

(4) rinsing step with TFA (0.5 mmol L −1 )/MeOH 10/90 (v/v).<br />

Detection was carried out at 280 and 325 nm. Fractions were<br />

collected over 12-min periods, combined according to the<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1803


1804<br />

mV<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

A<br />

S Di 3<br />

S Di 2<br />

S Di 4<br />

S Di 5<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500<br />

mV<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

C<br />

S Tri 7<br />

S Di 6<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500<br />

www.soci.org D Dobberstein, M Bunzel<br />

mV<br />

700 B<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

SDi8 SDi9 S Di 11<br />

0<br />

min 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 min<br />

min<br />

450 D<br />

mV<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

S Tri 9<br />

S Tri 10<br />

S Tri 12<br />

S Tri 11<br />

S Tri 13<br />

0<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 min<br />

Figure 2. Separation of the size exclusion fractions B3 (top; A, B) and B2 (bottom; C, D) by using Sephadex LH-20 chromatography. (A) Elution with<br />

0.5 mmol L −1 aqueous trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)/methanol (MeOH) (50/50, v/v), detection at 280 nm. (B) Elution with 0.5 mmol L −1 aqueous TFA/MeOH<br />

(40/60, v/v), detection at 280 nm. (C) Elution with 0.5 mmol L −1 aqueous TFA/MeOH (50/50, v/v), detection at 325 nm. (D) Elution with 0.5 mmol L −1<br />

aqueous TFA/MeOH (40/60, v/v), detection at 325 nm. Elution with 0.5 mmol L −1 aqueous TFA/MeOH (95/5, v/v) is not shown for both size exclusion<br />

fractions. S Di 2–S Di 11 contained the following dehydrodiferulic acids: S Di 2: 8-8(tetrahydrofuran)-; S Di 3: 8-8(aryltetralin)-, S Di 4: 8-8-, S Di 5: 8-5-, S Di 6: 8-O-4-,<br />

8-5(benzofuran)-, S Di 8andS Di 9: 5-5-, S Di 11: 8-5(decarboxylated)-dehydrodiferulic acid. For S Tri 7toS Tri 13 see text.<br />

chromatogram (Fig. 2), and evaporated. Fractions S tri 7 and<br />

S tri 9–S tri 13 were further separated by using semi-preparative<br />

RP-HPLC.<br />

RP-HPLC was carried out by using a semi-preparative phenylhexyl<br />

column (250×10 mm i.d., 5 µm particle size), ternary gradient<br />

systems made up of aqueous TFA (1 mmol L −1 ), acetonitrile (ACN),<br />

and MeOH, and a flow rate of 2.5 mL min −1 .Injectionvolume<br />

was 60 µL and the separation was performed at either 35 or 45 ◦ C.<br />

Chromatograms were monitored at 280 and 325 nm. The following<br />

gradients were used (eluent A: aqueous TFA (1 mmol L −1 ); eluent<br />

B: ACN/aq. TFA (1 mmol L −1 ) 90/10 (v/v); eluent C: MeOH/aq. TFA<br />

(1 mmol L −1 ) 90/10 (v/v)): Fractionation of S tri 7: initially A 60%, B<br />

25%, C 15%, held for 15 min, linear over 5 min to A 45%, B 35%,<br />

C 20%, held for 5 min, linear over 5 min to A 25%, B 35%, C 40%,<br />

held for 5 min, linear over 5 min to A 0%, B 0%, C 100%, held for<br />

5 min, following an equilibration step. Fractionation of S tri 9and<br />

S tri 10: initially A 75%, B 10%, C 15%, held for 10 min, linear over<br />

5 min to A 60%, B 25%, C 15%, held for 5 min, linear over 5 min<br />

to A 50%, B 25%, C 25%, held for 5 min, linear over 5 min to A<br />

20%, B 25%, C 55%, held for 5 min, following an equilibration step.<br />

Fractionation of S tri 11–S tri 13: initially A 65%, B 20%, C 15%, held<br />

for 15 min, linear over 5 min to A 50%, B 35%, C 15%, held for 5 min,<br />

linear over 5 min to A 40%, B 35%, C 25%, linear over 5 min to A<br />

10%, B 35%, C 55%, held for 5 min, following an equilibration step.<br />

Fractions were collected according to the chromatograms, pooled<br />

and evaporated. Some fractions had to be re-chromatographed to<br />

increase purity for structural characterization.<br />

Characterization of the fractions and isolated compounds<br />

The UV spectra and the molecular weights were determined<br />

by RP-HPLC coupled to both a photodiode array detector<br />

and a mass spectrometer (atmospheric pressure–electrospray<br />

ionization, positive and negative mode). The fragmentor voltage<br />

was either 75 V (positive mode) or 90 V (negative mode), the<br />

scan range m/z 100–1000. Elution on an analytical phenyl-hexyl<br />

column (250 × 4.6 mm i.d.) was carried out by using the following<br />

gradient (eluent A: 0.1% (v/v) formic acid; eluent B: ACN): Initially<br />

A 82%, B 18%, linear over 5 min to A 80%, B 20%, linear over<br />

5 min to A 75%, B 25%, linear over 5 min to A 70%, B 30%, linear<br />

over 10 min to A 65%, B 35%, held for 5 min, linear over 5 min<br />

to A 55%, B 45%, followed by rinsing and equilibration steps.<br />

The column temperature was held at 35 or 45 ◦ C, the injection<br />

volume was 20 µL. Structural identification was performed using<br />

1 H- and HMQC-NMR experiments. Samples were dissolved in<br />

0.7 mL acetone-d6. Chemical shifts (d) were referenced to the<br />

central solvent signals (dH 2.04 ppm; dC 29.8 ppm). J-values were<br />

calculated in hertz.<br />

Screening for ester-bound cyclobutane dimers and monolignol–ferulate<br />

cross-products by GC-MS<br />

An aliquot of the BioBeads fraction B3 (about 0.3 mg) was<br />

silylated in pyridine/BSTFA 1/4 (v/v) for 30 min at 60 ◦ C. The<br />

silylated compounds were separated and detected by GC-MS.<br />

He (1 mL min −1 ) was used as carrier gas. GC conditions were as<br />

follows: HP-5-MS fused-silica capillary column (30 m, 0.32 mm i.d.,<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810


Ferulate oligomers from corn stover www.soci.org<br />

Relative Abundance %<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

F-CA 1<br />

CC ht<br />

CC h<br />

CCht CChh<br />

?<br />

CFht CCht CFht 8-8(aryltetralin)-DFA<br />

CC hh<br />

CF/FF ht<br />

FF ht<br />

FFht<br />

FF ht<br />

FFht FFht F-CA 2<br />

39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51<br />

Figure 3. GC-MS chromatogram of the silylated compounds of size exclusion fraction B3. CC, CF, FF: cyclobutane dimers made up of p-coumaric acid<br />

(C) and/or ferulic acid (F); DFA: dehydrodiferulic acid; F-CA: ferulate-4-O-β-coniferyl alcohol cross-coupled structures; MEL: ferulate-8-β-coniferyl alcohol<br />

cross-product of the monoepoxylignaloide type.<br />

0.25 µm film thickness); initial column temperature, 150 ◦ C, held<br />

for 1 min, ramped at 3 ◦ Cmin −1 to 250 ◦ C, ramped at 30 ◦ Cmin −1<br />

to 300 ◦ C; held for 25 min; injector temperature 300 ◦ C; split 1/10;<br />

ionization energy 70 eV; scan range: m/z 50–700.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Isolation procedure<br />

Liberation of hydroxycinnamate derivatives from their ester<br />

linkages in the cell wall as well as extraction and fractionation of<br />

these compounds according to their molecular weights followed<br />

a procedure formerly applied to corn bran. 11 However, compared<br />

to the SEC of hydroxycinnamate derivatives from corn bran<br />

the SEC separation achieved here was worse, particularly the<br />

separation between the ‘dimer’ fraction B3 (supposed to contain<br />

mostly hydroxycinnamate dimers) from the ‘trimer’ fraction B2<br />

(supposed to contain mostly hydroxycinnamate trimers) (Fig. 1).<br />

As detailed below, the composition of both the dimer and the<br />

trimer fraction is more complex for corn stover than for corn bran.<br />

As corn stover partially contains highly lignified cell walls, crossproducts<br />

between hydroxycinnamic acids and mono-/oligolignols<br />

are expected to add to the complexity of the chromatogram.<br />

Further separation of the dimer and trimer fractions B3 and B2 by<br />

using Sephadex LH-20 chromatography resulted in more complex<br />

chromatograms as compared to those from corn bran also (Fig. 2).<br />

The diversity of the hydroxycinnamate derivatives extracted from<br />

corn stover made unambiguous identification more difficult and<br />

required additional fractionation work.<br />

Identification of hydroxycinnamate dimers:<br />

dehydrodiferulates<br />

An aliquot of SEC fraction B3 was silylated and analyzed by GC-MS.<br />

Figure 3 shows a section of the chromatogram. In contrast to<br />

corn bran, the dimeric fraction of corn stover is highly complex<br />

8-5-DFA<br />

F-CA 3<br />

?<br />

8-O-4-DFA<br />

8-5(benzofuran)-DFA<br />

MEL<br />

5-5-DFA<br />

8-5(decarboxylated)-DFA<br />

min<br />

and dominated by signals other than dehydrodiferulate signals.<br />

Comparison of retention times and mass spectra 24 with those of<br />

authentic standard compounds 25,26 led to the identification of the<br />

following dehydrodiferulates in alkaline corn stover hydrolyzates:<br />

8-8(aryltetralin)-, 8-5(benzofuran)-, 8-5-, 8-5(decarboxylated),<br />

8-O-4-, and 5-5-dehydrodiferulic acids. As is true for all alkaline<br />

hydrolyzates, the 8-5- and 8-5(decarboxylated) dimers are presumably<br />

formed during alkaline hydrolysis from their precursor in<br />

the plant, the 8-5(benzofuran)-dehydrodiferulate. Due to the complexity<br />

of the chromatogram neither the 8-8-dehydrodiferulic acid<br />

nor the recently discovered 8-8(tetrahydrofuran)-dehydrodiferulic<br />

acid 26 could be clearly identified by GC-MS of the SEC fraction B3.<br />

Further fractionation of fraction B3 by Sephadex LH-20 chromatography<br />

(Fig. 2) and analysis of these fractions by HPLC–photodiode<br />

array detection/MS, however, led to an unambiguous identification<br />

of the 8-8- and the 8-8(tetrahydrofuran)-dehydrodiferulic<br />

acids in the alkaline corn stover hydrolyzate. Thus, with the exception<br />

of the 4-O-5-dehydrodiferulic acid, 27 which is usually only<br />

a minor dimer, all known dehydrodimers were identified in the<br />

stover hydrolyzate.<br />

Identification of hydroxycinnamate dimers:<br />

cyclobutane dimers<br />

In the late 1980s and early 1990s cyclobutane dimers were<br />

discussed as major hydroxycinnamate cross-links in grasses.<br />

However, the discovery of dehydrodiferulates other than the<br />

5-5-dehydodiferulate in 1994 28 shifted interest towards the radically<br />

coupled dehydrodimers. As the plant has more control<br />

over the formation of radically formed dehydrodimers than over<br />

the formation of cyclobutane dimers induced by UV light this<br />

shift of interest is logical from a plant physiological point of<br />

view. Also, in plant organs and tissues which are protected<br />

from light, e.g. corn seeds protected by the husk, only low<br />

amounts of cyclobutane dimers were detected. However, as evident<br />

from Fig. 3, cyclobutane dimers are abundant in the analyzed<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1805


1806<br />

Table 1. Cyclobutane dimers identified from the alkaline hydrolyzate<br />

of corn stover ∗<br />

Cyclobutane<br />

dimer<br />

Retention<br />

time (min) †<br />

m/z<br />

245<br />

Ratio m/z<br />

219/249<br />

Ratio m/z<br />

249/308<br />

www.soci.org D Dobberstein, M Bunzel<br />

Ratio m/z<br />

293/308<br />

m/z<br />

661<br />

CC ht 39.32 − – – – –<br />

CC hh 40.29 + – – – –<br />

CC hh 40.81 + – – – –<br />

CC ht 41.03 − – – – –<br />

CC ht 41.17 − – – – –<br />

CC hh 41.25 + – – – –<br />

CF ht 41.73 −


Ferulate oligomers from corn stover www.soci.org<br />

mV<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

S tri 7<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 min<br />

mV<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

mV<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

S tri 10<br />

S tri 12<br />

8-5-DFA<br />

8-O-4/8-5-triFA<br />

8-8(aryltetralin)/8-O-4-triFA<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 min<br />

X 1<br />

X 2<br />

X 4<br />

8-5/5-5-triFA<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1600<br />

1200<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 min 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 min<br />

mV<br />

mV<br />

800<br />

400<br />

0<br />

mV<br />

1600<br />

1200<br />

800<br />

400<br />

S tri 9<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 min<br />

S tri 11<br />

S tri 13<br />

5-5-DFA<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 min<br />

Figure 4. Semi-preparative RP-HPLC chromatograms (detection at 325 nm) showing the fractionation of the ‘trimeric’ Sephadex LH-20 fractions (Fig. 2).<br />

triFA: dehydrotriferulic acid.<br />

doublets indicate one unsubstituted trans-cinnamate side-chain,<br />

and two doublet-of-doublets indicate that only two of the three<br />

guaiacyl units are unsubstituted whereas the third one is linked<br />

in 5-position (absence of an 8 Hz coupling for the proton in<br />

6-position). Comparison of the assigned proton data shows good<br />

agreement with literature data. 13 The molecular mass of the<br />

thirdcompoundisolatedfromS tri 7 was 578 indicating a ferulate<br />

trimer, too. Interpreting 1 Hand 13 C (from 2D HMQC experiment)<br />

NMR data this compound was unambiguously identified as 8-<br />

8(aryltetralin)/8-O-4-dehydrodiferulic acid. Characteristic signals<br />

are for example two singlets at 7.33 and 7.61 ppm indicating two<br />

8-linked ferulate units and two doublets at 4.58 and 3.93 ppm<br />

(2 Hz coupling) indicating the 8-8(aryltetralin) linkage. Absence of<br />

16 Hz doublets indicated that none of the cinnamate side-chains is<br />

unsubstituted. Comparison of the NMR data with literature data 12<br />

fully supported this assignment. Although two more compounds<br />

were isolated from S tri 7 (X1 and X2, Fig.4) an unambiguous<br />

identification of these compounds failed. Here, as also true for<br />

other fractions, solubility issues led to substance losses, reduced<br />

sensitivity in NMR, etc.<br />

Fraction S tri 9 contained 8-O-4/8-O-4-dehydrotriferulic acid<br />

(Fig. 5, III). The trimeric nature of this compound was confirmed by<br />

its molecular mass (578), and the assigned proton NMR data are in<br />

full agreement with published data. 12 Again, two singlets 7.31 and<br />

7.34 ppm indicate two 8-O-4-linkages, confirmed by the absence of<br />

16 Hz doublets and the fact that three doublet-of-doublets indicate<br />

that neither guaiacyl unit is further substituted. The second<br />

compound (X3) isolated from this fraction was characterized as a<br />

trimer but could not be unambiguously identified.<br />

The only compound which could be identified from the<br />

fractions S tri 10 and S tri 11 was the 5-5-coupled dehydrodiferulic<br />

acid. Identification of the compounds X4 and X5 failed. The<br />

compound isolated from S tri 12 was tentatively identified as 8-5/5-<br />

5-dehydrotriferulic acid (Fig. 5, V). The chromatographic behavior<br />

of this compound during the fractionation as well as the mass<br />

spectrum and UV spectrum of this compound matches 8-5/5-<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

8-O-4/8-O-4-triFA<br />

5-5/8-O-4-triFA<br />

X 3<br />

X 5<br />

1807


1808<br />

H 3CO<br />

H 3 CO<br />

H<br />

HO<br />

OH<br />

HO O<br />

OH<br />

IV<br />

8<br />

5<br />

8<br />

5<br />

O<br />

O<br />

5<br />

HO<br />

4<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

8<br />

O<br />

O<br />

O<br />

OCH 3<br />

4<br />

OCH 3<br />

OCH 3<br />

OCH 3<br />

I<br />

OH<br />

O<br />

O<br />

www.soci.org D Dobberstein, M Bunzel<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

V<br />

O<br />

HO<br />

OH<br />

8<br />

O<br />

O<br />

OCH 3<br />

5<br />

HO<br />

OCH 3<br />

H<br />

O<br />

H 3 CO<br />

OCH 3<br />

5<br />

OH<br />

HO O OH<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

Figure 5. Structures of the isolated and identified trimers 8-O-4/8-5-dehydrotriferulic acid (I), 8-8(aryltetralin)/8-O-4-dehydrotriferulic acid (II), 8-O-4/8-<br />

O-4-dehydrotriferulic acid (III), and 5-5/8-O-4-dehydrotriferulic acid (IV). Compound V, 8-5/5-5-dehydrotriferulic acid, was only tentatively identified in<br />

corn stover.<br />

5-dehydrotriferulic acid. 11 However, due to solubility issues and<br />

low sample amounts the final characterization by NMR was not<br />

successful leaving this assignment tentative.<br />

5-5/8-O-4-Dehydrotriferulic acid (Fig. 5, IV) was successfully<br />

isolated from fraction S tri 13. UV spectrum, mass spectrum, proton<br />

and carbon NMR data of the isolated compound perfectly match<br />

those of 5-5/8-O-4-dehydrotriferulic acid. 14 Four doublets with<br />

16 Hz coupling constants in the proton spectrum indicate two<br />

intact trans-cinnamate side chains, a singlet at 7.40 ppm is<br />

indicative for one 8-coupled side chain, and the fact that only one<br />

doublet-of-doublets is present shows that two guaiacyl units are<br />

linked in 5-position (demonstrated by the missing 8 Hz coupling<br />

for the protons in the 6 position).<br />

To date, seven dehydrotriferulates were isolated. 36 As corn<br />

bran is (1) an excellent source for ferulates in general, 24,37 (2) only<br />

slightly lignified, 38 and (3) obtained from the seeds which are<br />

protected from light by the husk suppressing the formation<br />

of cyclobutane dimers, it was chosen as ideal starting material<br />

searching for higher radically formed ferulate oligomers. As<br />

recently reviewed, 36 the 5-5/8-O-4-trimer was also identified<br />

by HPLC-UV and comparison with a standard compound in<br />

other cereal grains (wheat bran, 39 rye bran 40,41 and wild rice 41 ).<br />

However, the identification of ferulate trimers from the vegetative<br />

plant organs of grasses has not been performed yet. As this<br />

material shows such a complex composition of hydroxycinnamate<br />

derivatives, simple identification of these trimers by HPLC-UV or<br />

HPLC coupled to a single-quadrupole MS could not be readily<br />

achieved. By performing the more laborious but unequivocal<br />

4<br />

OCH 3<br />

5<br />

8<br />

8<br />

4<br />

III<br />

OCH 3<br />

HO<br />

O<br />

H 3CO<br />

O<br />

8<br />

OCH 3<br />

O<br />

4<br />

OH<br />

O<br />

O<br />

II<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

8<br />

8<br />

O<br />

O<br />

OH<br />

OH<br />

OCH 3<br />

method of isolating these compounds throughout a series<br />

of chromatographic steps, four of the seven known trimers<br />

were isolated, and a fifth trimer was tentatively assigned. This<br />

demonstrates that the formation of ferulate trimers is not limited<br />

to the reproductive organs of the grasses but also contributes<br />

to the formation of networks in the cell walls of vegetative<br />

organs. Quantitative aspects are hard to judge from these<br />

studies. The isolation or synthesis of higher milligram quantities<br />

of ferulate trimers and higher oligomers and the development<br />

and full validation of an HPLC/UPLC–triple-quadrupole MS or<br />

HPLC/UPLC-quadrupole-ion trap MS methodology is required to<br />

gain quantitative information about these compounds in different<br />

plant tissues.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

By isolation of ferulate dehydrotrimers, we demonstrated that<br />

higher ferulates potentially contribute to the formation of<br />

networks in the cell walls of corn stover. Although only four<br />

trimers were unambiguously identified it can be assumed that<br />

more trimers and even higher oligomers contribute to the<br />

structure of the cell walls of corn stover. The complexity of the<br />

alkaline hydrolyzate, however, prevented us from isolating more<br />

compounds in sufficient purity to unambiguously identify their<br />

structures. As quantification of ferulate trimers is yet not possible<br />

the significance of these compounds for the formation of cell<br />

wall cross-links in corn stover and for the reduction of forage<br />

digestibility cannot be judged at this time. In addition to the<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810


Ferulate oligomers from corn stover www.soci.org<br />

radically formed ferulate dimers and higher oligomers our studies<br />

‘remind’ us that cyclobutane dimers have to be integrated into our<br />

analytical procedures if the degree of polymer cross-linking is to be<br />

correctly determined. Whereas many studies have dealt with the<br />

quantification of radically formed dehydrodiferulates only a few<br />

attempts were made to determine the amounts of cyclobutane<br />

dimers in plant materials. Most studies aimed to identify these<br />

compounds or provided a semi quantitative analysis only. More<br />

work should be invested in determining the concentrations of<br />

higher ferulate oligomers but also cyclobutane dimers in plant<br />

materials by developing and applying well-validated analytical<br />

procedures.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors are grateful to Professor Frieder Schwarz and Dr<br />

Friederike Zeller for providing the plant material and excellent<br />

collaboration. This project was funded by Monsanto Agrar<br />

Deutschland GmbH.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Hatfield RD, Ralph J and Grabber JH, Cell wall structural foundations:<br />

Molecular basis for improving forage digestibilities. Crop Sci<br />

39:27–37 (1999).<br />

2 Grabber JH, Ralph J and Hatfield RD, Severe inhibition of maize wall<br />

degradation by synthetic lignins formed with coniferaldehyde. JSci<br />

Food Agric 78:81–87 (1998).<br />

3 Grabber JH, Ralph J and Hatfield RD, Ferulate cross-links limit the<br />

enzymatic degradation of synthetically lignified primary walls of<br />

maize. J Agric Food Chem 46:2609–2614 (1998).<br />

4 Grabber JH, Hatfield RD and Ralph J, Diferulate cross-links impede the<br />

enzymatic degradation of non-lignified maize walls. J Sci Food Agric<br />

77:193–200 (1998).<br />

5 Jung HG and Casler MD, Maize stem tissues: cell wall concentration and<br />

composition during development. Crop Sci 46:1793–1800 (2006).<br />

6 Jung H, Identification of cell wall traits that can be manipulated to<br />

improve forage digestibility, in Informational Conference with Dairy<br />

and Forage Industries, US Dairy Forage <strong>Research</strong> Center, Madson,<br />

WI, USA, pp. 9–14 (1996).<br />

7 Ralph J, Hatfield RD, Quideau S, Helm RF, Grabber JH and Jung H-JG,<br />

Pathway of p-coumaric acid incorporation into maize lignin as<br />

revealed by NMR. JAmChemSoc116:9448–9456 (1994).<br />

8 Ishii T and Hiroi T, Linkage of phenolic acids to cell-wall<br />

polysaccharides of bamboo shoot. Carbohydr Res 206:297–310<br />

(1990).<br />

9 Allerdings E, Ralph J, Steinhart H and Bunzel M, Isolation and structural<br />

identification of complex feruloylated heteroxylan side-chains from<br />

maize bran. Phytochemistry 67:1276–1286 (2006).<br />

10 Ishii T, Structure and functions of feruloylated polysaccharides. Plant<br />

Sci 127:111–127 (1997).<br />

11 Bunzel M, Ralph J, Brüning P and Steinhart H, Structural identification<br />

of dehydrotriferulic and dehydrotetraferulic acids from insoluble<br />

maize bran fiber. J Agric Food Chem 54:6409–6418 (2006).<br />

12 Funk C, Ralph J, Steinhart H and Bunzel M, Isolation and structural<br />

characterisation of 8–O–4/8–O–4- and 8–8/8–O–4-coupled<br />

dehydrotriferulic acids from maize bran. Phytochemistry<br />

66:363–371 (2005).<br />

13 Bunzel M, Ralph J, Funk C and Steinhart H, Structural elucidation of<br />

new ferulic acid-containing phenolic dimers and trimers isolated<br />

from maize bran. Tetrahedron Lett 46:5845–5850 (2005).<br />

14 Bunzel M, Ralph J, Funk C and Steinhart H, Isolation and identification<br />

of a ferulic acid dehydrotrimer from saponified maize bran insoluble<br />

fiber. Eur Food Res Technol 217:128–133 (2003).<br />

15 Rouau X, Cheynier V, Surget A, Gloux D, Barron C, Meudec E, et al,<br />

A dehydrotrimer of ferulic acid from maize bran. Phytochemistry<br />

63:899–903 (2003).<br />

16 Jacquet G, Pollet B, Lapierre C, Mhamdi F and Rolando C, New etherlinked<br />

ferulic acid–coniferyl alcohol dimers identified in grass<br />

straws. J Agric Food Chem 43:2746–2751 (1995).<br />

17 Bunzel M, Ralph J, Lu F, Hatfield RD and Steinhart H, Lignins and<br />

ferulate–coniferyl alcohol cross-coupling products in cereal grains.<br />

J Agric Food Chem 52:6496–6502 (2004).<br />

18 Ralph J, Grabber JH and Hatfield RD, Lignin–ferulate cross-links in<br />

grasses: active incorporation of ferulate polysaccharide esters into<br />

ryegrass lignins. Carbohydr Res 275:167–178 (1995).<br />

19 Quideau S and Ralph J, Lignin–ferulate cross-links in grasses. Part<br />

4. Incorporation of 5–5-coupled dehydrodiferulate into synthetic<br />

lignin. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:2351–2358 (1997).<br />

20 Hatfield RD, Ralph J and Grabber JH, A potential role for sinapyl pcoumarate<br />

as a radical transfer mechanism in grass lignin formation.<br />

Planta 228:919–928 (2008).<br />

21 Hartley RD, Morrison WH, Balza F and Towers GHN, Substituted<br />

truxillic and truxinic acids in cell walls of Cynodon dactylon.<br />

Phytochemistry 29:3699–3703 (1990).<br />

22 Hartley RD, Morrison WH, Borneman WS, Rigsby LL, Oneill M,<br />

Hanna WW, et al, Phenolic constituents of cell-wall types of normal<br />

and brown midrib mutants of pearl-millet (Pennisetumglaucum (L) R<br />

Br) in relation to wall biodegradability. J Sci Food Agric 59:211–216<br />

(1992).<br />

23 Ford CW and Hartley RD, Cyclodimers of p-coumaric and ferulic acids<br />

in the cell walls of tropical grasses. J Sci Food Agric 50:29–43 (1990).<br />

24 Bunzel M, Ralph J, Marita JM, Hatfield RD and Steinhart H, Diferulates<br />

as structural components in soluble and insoluble cereal dietary<br />

fibre. J Sci Food Agric 81:653–660 (2001).<br />

25 Bunzel M, Funk C and Steinhart H, Semipreparative isolation of<br />

dehydrodiferulic and dehydrotriferulic acids as standard substances<br />

from maize bran. JSepSci27:1080–1086 (2004).<br />

26 Schatz PF, Ralph J, Lu F, Guzei IA and Bunzel M, Synthesis<br />

and identification of 2,5-bis-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetrahydrofuran-3,4-dicarboxylic<br />

acid, an unanticipated ferulate<br />

8-8-coupling product acylating cereal plant cell walls. Org Biomol<br />

Chem 4:2801–2806 (2006).<br />

27 Bunzel M, Ralph J, Marita J and Steinhart H, Identification of 4-O-5 ′ -<br />

coupled diferulic acid from insoluble cereal fiber. J Agric Food Chem<br />

48:3166–3169 (2000).<br />

28 Ralph J, Quideau S, Grabber JH and Hatfield RD, Identification and<br />

synthesis of new ferulic acid dehydrodimers present in grass cellwalls.<br />

J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:3485–3498 (1994).<br />

29 Packert M and Steinhart H, Separation and identification of some<br />

monomeric and dimeric phenolic acids by a simple gas<br />

chromatographic method using a capillary column and FID-MSD.<br />

J Chromatogr Sci 33:631–639 (1995).<br />

30 Ford CW and Hartley RD, GC/MS characterisation of cyclodimers from<br />

p-coumaric and ferulic acids by photodimerisation – a possible<br />

factor influencing cell wall biodegradability. J Sci Food Agric<br />

46:301–310 (1989).<br />

31 Stewart D, Robertson GW and Morrison IM, Identification of<br />

cyclobutane-type dimers of substituted cinnamic-acids by<br />

gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass<br />

Spectrom 6:46–53 (1992).<br />

32 Morrison IM, Robertson GW, Stewart D and Wightman F, Determination<br />

and characterization of cyclodimers of naturally occuring<br />

phenolic acids. Phytochemistry 30:2007–2011 (1991).<br />

33 Hartley RD, Whatley FR and Harris PJ, 4,4 ′ -Dihydroxytruxillic acid as<br />

a component of cell walls of Lolium multiflorum. Phytochemistry<br />

27:349–351 (1988).<br />

34 Packert M, Analytik und Bedeutung gebundener aromatischer<br />

Carbonsäuren der Nahrungsfaser aus Getreide und anderen<br />

Nutzpflanzen, PhD thesis. Institut für Biochemie und<br />

Lebensmittelchemie, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg (1993).<br />

35 Grabber JH, Ralph J and Hatfield RD, Model studies of<br />

ferulate–coniferyl alcohol cross-product formation in primary<br />

maize walls: Implications for lignification in grasses. J Agric Food<br />

Chem 50:6008–6016 (2002).<br />

36 Bunzel M, Chemistry and occurence of hydroxycinnamate oligomers.<br />

Phytochem Rev 9:47–64 (2010).<br />

37 Hatfield RD, Ralph J and Grabber JH, Cell wall cross-linking by ferulates<br />

and diferulates in grasses. J Sci Food Agric 79:403–407 (1999).<br />

38 Lapierre C, Pollet B, Ralet MC and Saulnier L, The phenolic fraction<br />

of maize bran: evidence for lignin–heteroxylan association.<br />

Phytochemistry 57:765–772 (2001).<br />

39 Antoine C, Peyron S, Lullien-Pellerin V, Abecassis J and Rouau X, Wheat<br />

bran tissue fractionation using biochemical markers. J Cereal Sci<br />

39:387–393 (2004).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1809


1810<br />

40 Cyran MR and Saulnier L, Cell wall fractions isolated from outer layers<br />

of rye grain by sequential treatment with alpha-amylase and<br />

proteinase: Structural investigation of polymers in two ryes with<br />

contrasting breadmaking quality. J Agric Food Chem 53:9213–9224<br />

(2005).<br />

www.soci.org D Dobberstein, M Bunzel<br />

41 Dobberstein D, Steinhart H and Bunzel M, Bestimmung mono-, di- und<br />

trimerer Phenolcarbonsäuren pflanzlicher Herkunft (Determination<br />

of mono-, di- and trimeric phenolic acids from plant origin), Abstract<br />

written in German. Lebensmittelchemie 60:101–102 (2006).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1802–1810


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 16 December 2009 Revised: 13 April 2010 Accepted: 26 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 10 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4019<br />

A modified spectrophotometric assay<br />

to estimate deglycosylation of steroidal<br />

saponin to sapogenin by mixed ruminal<br />

microbes<br />

Yuxi Wang ∗ and Tim A McAllister<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: The lack of a method for measuring deglycosylation of saponins in ruminal fluid has limited the ability to<br />

investigate the impact of these compounds on rumen microorganisms. A simple spectrophotometric assay was adapted and a<br />

protocol developed to enable measurement of steroidal saponin and sapogenin in ruminal fluid. The procedure was used for<br />

in vitro determination of deglycosylation activity of rumen bacteria obtained from cattle fed or not fed Yucca schidigera saponin,<br />

and to determine the relative deglycosylase activities of extracellular and cell-associated enzymes from ruminal content.<br />

RESULTS: Modifications to the spectrophotometric assay (i.e. heating time shortened to 10 min and 0.5 mL dH2O added to<br />

the reaction mixture) improved the stability of the optical density (425 nm) of the chromophore for up to 24 h post-reaction.<br />

Centrifugation (12 000 × g, 20 min) enabled differential estimations of steroidal saponin and sapogenin in ruminal fluid.<br />

Steroidal saponin added to defaunated ruminal fluid (dRF) or clarified ruminal fluid (cRF) was recovered completely from the<br />

mixture as saponin + sapogenin (99.1% and 100.6%, respectively), whereas saponin recovery from the supernatant of dRF<br />

was greatly reduced (P < 0.001) compared to that from supernatant of cRF (58.5 vs. 98.7%). Saponin recoveries from the<br />

supernatants of dRF and cRF did not differ between donor cattle fed or not fed Yucca schidigera saponin (59.2 vs. 57.3%<br />

and 98.4 vs. 99.3%, respectively). The majority (89–90%) of saponin added to a ruminal extracellular enzyme preparation<br />

was recoverable in supernatant after 24 h, compared with only 26–32% remaining in supernatant from incubation with a<br />

cell-associated enzymes fraction.<br />

CONCLUSION: Mixed rumen bacteria deglycosylate steroidal saponin to sapogenin, at activity levels unaffected by prior<br />

exposure to saponin, but they were unable to degrade the sapogenin core structure. Deglycosylation activity occurred primarily<br />

in the cell-associated enzyme fraction of ruminal content.<br />

Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd<br />

Keywords: assay; deglycosylation; enzymes; rumen fluid; steroidal saponins<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Steroidal saponins are present in a wide variety of monocotyledonous<br />

plants and less commonly in dicots and have been<br />

found to alter rumen fermentation 1–3 through direct effects on<br />

rumen microorganisms, 4–6 leading to responses that may improve<br />

ruminant productivity. 7–9 In response to the total ban on<br />

antibiotic growth promoters imposed by the European Union<br />

and increasing pressure on livestock industries worldwide to restrict<br />

sub-therapeutic use of antibiotics as growth promoters,<br />

researchers have been investigating potential alternative feed<br />

additives, among which are steroidal saponins.<br />

Although steroidal saponins may exert a desirable influence<br />

on ruminal fermentation, there is evidence that these benefits<br />

may be transient, attributable to adaptation by rumen microbial<br />

populations. 10,11 In general, two factors may contribute to rumen<br />

microbes adapting to saponins: development of tolerance or<br />

reduced sensitivity to the saponins’ antimicrobial properties,<br />

or direct microbial deactivation of the saponin via enzymatic<br />

degradation. Defining the relative importance of these two factors<br />

has been hampered by the lack of a suitable method for measuring<br />

degradation of steroidal saponins in ruminal fluid. Baccou et al. 12<br />

described a spectrophotometric assay that accurately measured<br />

steroidal saponin and sapogenin as total steroidal sapogenin, via<br />

production of a chromophore generated from a reaction involving<br />

the aglycone core of saponin/sapogenin, p-anisaldehyde and<br />

sulfuric acid in ethyl acetate. In a preliminary study, however, we<br />

determined that non-specific reactions occurring in the reaction<br />

mixture generated an intense, unstable background color that<br />

gave rise to substantial variation in the estimation of steroidal<br />

saponin and sapogenin in ruminal fluid.<br />

Several studies have shown that saponins are deglycosylated<br />

in the rumen to form free sapogenins. 5,13,14 Segal and Schlösser 15<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Yuxi Wang, AAFC <strong>Research</strong> Centre, P.O. Box 3000,<br />

Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada. E-mail: yuxi.wang@agr.gc.ca<br />

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada <strong>Research</strong> Centre, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge,<br />

Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818 www.soci.org Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada.<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd<br />

1811


1812<br />

proposed that destabilization of cell membranes by saponins<br />

requires their deglycosylation in the immediate vicinity of the<br />

membrane. In agreement, we observed that purified steroidal<br />

sapogenin had no effect on ruminal cellulolytic bacteria (Wang<br />

et al., unpublished data). Similarly, others have found that once<br />

deglycosylated, saponins no longer exhibit their antifungal<br />

properties. 16,17 Thus, further definition of the mechanisms of<br />

microbial metabolism of saponins in the rumen could provide<br />

valuable information with regard to their potential to favorably<br />

manipulate ruminal fermentation.<br />

This study was conducted with the objective of modifying<br />

the spectrophotometric method of Baccou et al. 12 to enable<br />

measurement, in ruminal fluid, of steroidal saponin and of<br />

sapogenin, its deglycosylated, insoluble form, and to use the<br />

modified procedure to assess the deglycosylase activity of ruminal<br />

microbes by comparing the activities in cell-associated and extracellular<br />

enzyme fractions.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

This study used smilagenin (minimum 98%; Sigma Chemical Co.,<br />

St Louis, MO, USA) and steroidal saponin extracted from Yucca<br />

schidigera (Desert King International, San Diego, CA USA) as<br />

model steroidal sapogenins and steroidal saponins, respectively.<br />

Smilagenin was dissolved in absolute ethanol (50 mg 100 mL −1 )<br />

for use in all assays. Baccou et al. 12 reported that all steroidal<br />

sapogenins and/or saponins tested including smilagenin and<br />

saponins containing smilagenin, produced similar chromophores<br />

(max. absorption at 430 nm) upon reaction with p-anisaldehyde<br />

and sulfuric acid in ethyl acetate. Thus, steroidal saponin and/or<br />

sapogenin measured in this study were expressed as smilagenin<br />

equivalents (SE).<br />

Extraction of steroidal saponins from Yucca schidigera<br />

Powdered Yucca schidigera (YS) plant material was used as a<br />

source of saponins in this study. To remove fat and endogenous<br />

smilagenin from the dry powder, 60 g were combined with 200 mL<br />

of petroleum ether (Sigma Chemical Co.) and mixed continuously<br />

for 2 h in a sealed container at room temperature (21 ◦ C), then<br />

filtered through Waterman No. 1 filter paper. The residue was<br />

washed with 100 mL of petroleum ether, filtered again and ether<br />

in the residue was allowed to volatilize under continuous air flow in<br />

a fume hood. The ether-extracted residue was mixed with 200 mL<br />

of dH2O at room temperature for 60 min prior to being filtered<br />

through Waterman No. 1 filter paper. The residue was washed<br />

with 100 mL of dH2O and filtered two more times and filtrates<br />

were combined. To remove tannins and phenolic compounds, the<br />

combined filtrate was mixed with 5 g of polyvinyl-polypyrolidone<br />

(GAF Materials Corporation, Wayne, NJ, USA). After centrifugation<br />

at 5000 × g (10 min, 4 ◦ C), the supernatant was lyophilized and the<br />

dried residue was dissolved in 100 mL of dH2O and centrifuged<br />

(10 000 × g,20min,4 ◦ C). To capture saponins from the resulting<br />

supernatant (100 mL), it was mixed with 200 mL of n-butanol<br />

(Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.2 mL of concentrated HCl and held at<br />

room temperature for 30 min, then centrifuged (10 000×g,10min,<br />

4 ◦ C). The butanol fraction was collected and the aqueous fraction<br />

was subjected to a second n-butanol extraction. Butanol fractions<br />

were combined and rotary evaporated at 50 ◦ C to dryness. The<br />

residue was dissolved in 100 mL of dH2O, centrifuged (12 000 × g,<br />

20 min, 4 ◦ C), and the supernatant was freeze-dried. The dried YS<br />

saponin extract was stored in a sealed amber container at 0 ◦ C.<br />

www.soci.org Y Wang, TA McAllister<br />

High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) of the<br />

extract prepared as described above confirmed that it produced<br />

no band and that the acid-hydrolysed (deglycosylated) extract<br />

produced a band corresponding to steroidal sapogenin (Wang<br />

et al., unpublished data). Using the modified spectrophotometric<br />

method described below, the steroidal saponin concentration in<br />

the YS extract was determined as 242.5 mg SE 100 g −1 .<br />

Experiment1:Modificationofthespectrophotometricmethod<br />

for application in ruminal fluid<br />

This study was based on the spectrophotometric method as<br />

described by Baccou et al. 12 In that method, a dry sample<br />

containing saponin or sapogenin is dissolved in 2 mL of ethyl<br />

acetate, to which is added 1 mL of 0.5% (v/v) anisaldehyde in<br />

ethyl acetate and then, after mixing, 1 mL of 50% (v/v) H2SO4<br />

in ethyl acetate. Reaction mixtures are then incubated at 60 ◦ C<br />

for 20 min for color development. Saponin present in samples<br />

is deglycosylated via acid hydrolysis, such that chromophore<br />

development arises from total saponin+sapogenin in a sample.<br />

Preliminary studies indicated to us that the Baccou et al. 12 assay<br />

was unsuitable for analysis of steroidal saponin and sapogenin in<br />

ruminal fluid because of interference from an intense background<br />

chromophore. Further investigation showed that reducing the<br />

reaction time at 60 ◦ C from 20 min to 10 min did not affect<br />

the density of chromophores formed, as judged by the optical<br />

density of the solution at 425 nm (OD425 values), and also that<br />

adding 0.5 mL of dH2O to the post-reaction solution (i.e. after a<br />

10minincubationat60 ◦ C)significantlyincreased the constancyof<br />

the reaction mixture OD425. These conditions (10 min incubation;<br />

post-reaction addition of dH2O) were used subsequently in testing<br />

saponin analysis in defined solvent vs. ruminal fluid.<br />

Preparation of samples for analysis from solution in dH2Oorruminal<br />

content<br />

Ruminal fluids collected from two steers fed a 40 : 60 barley<br />

grain : barley silage diet were strained through four layers of<br />

cheesecloth, combined in equal portions and then centrifuged<br />

(10 000 × g,20min,4 ◦ C), and the supernatant (denoted ‘partially<br />

clarified ruminal fluid’, pcRF) was used as a test solvent. The ruminal<br />

fluid donors used in this study were cared for according to the<br />

standards of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. 18<br />

Smilagenin (as a model sapogenin) and YS saponin extracted<br />

as described above were each assayed following suspension in<br />

pcRF to assess the usefulness of the protocol improvements in a<br />

ruminal application. Aqueous solutions of these compounds were<br />

included for comparison. Smilagenin–ethanol solution (50 mg SE<br />

100 mL −1 ) was combined with four volumes of either pcRF or<br />

dH2O. In 10-mL plastic tubes, 5-mL quantities of the suspension<br />

were frozen and lyophilised, and the residues were re-suspended<br />

into 2.0 mL of methanol. Extracted YS saponins were dissolved<br />

(125 µg SEmL −1 )indH2O or pcRF, and 4.0-mL quantities were<br />

frozen, lyophilised and the residues were re-suspended in 2.0 mL of<br />

methanol. Four replicates of each solution were prepared. Samples<br />

were centrifuged (1000 × g; 10 min) to remove particulates prior<br />

to assay.<br />

Assay and test of post-reaction addition of dH2O. Aliquots of the<br />

clear methanol solutions as prepared above were transferred<br />

into 20-mL glass test tubes to produce duplicate series of 0,<br />

5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 µg of steroidal saponin or smilagenin (to<br />

model sapogenin) per tube. Tubes were placed in a 60 ◦ Cwater<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd


Assay for saponin deglycosylation www.soci.org<br />

bath to evaporate methanol, after which 2.0 mL of ethyl acetate<br />

(OmniSolv; EMD Chemicals Inc., Gibstown, NJ, USA), 1.0 mL of 0.5%<br />

(v/v) p-anisaldehyde (Sigma Chemical Co.) in ethyl acetate, and<br />

1.0 mL of 50% (v/v) sulfuric acid in ethyl acetate were added to<br />

each. After thorough mixing (vortexing for 30 s), each tube was<br />

returned to the 60 ◦ C water bath. After a 10 min incubation, each<br />

tube was placed in a cold tap water bath. An aliquot of 0.5 mL of<br />

dH2O was added to one of each pair of duplicates, with the other<br />

left as it was, to determine the effect of post-reaction addition of<br />

dH2O ontheOD425 reading of the reaction solution. A Stasar III<br />

spectrophotometer (Gilford Instrument Laboratories Inc., Oberlin,<br />

OH, USA) was used to measure OD425 of each reaction solution<br />

immediately after mixing, and again at 0.5, 2, 6 and 24 h after the<br />

first measurement.<br />

Determining the effects of centrifugation to separate steroidal<br />

saponin from sapogenin<br />

Ruminal fluid collected from the same steers as in Experiment<br />

1 was strained through cheesecloth and the filtrate was then<br />

centrifuged (20 000 × g; 20min;4 ◦ C) to yield clarified ruminal<br />

fluid (cRF). Aliquots of smilagenin–ethanol or YS saponin–H2O<br />

solution were added to 15.0-mL tubes containing 7.0 mL of<br />

cRF to yield quaduplicate series of smilagenin at 250, 500,<br />

750 and 1000 µgmL −1 and of saponin at 450 or 500 µg SE<br />

mL −1 . From each of the quadruplicate tubes, four 1-mL subsamples<br />

were transferred into 2.0-mL vials. Two of these were<br />

transferred directly to a freezer set at −20 ◦ C, and the other<br />

two were centrifuged (12 000 × g, 20 min). The pellets were<br />

washed twice with 250-µL quantities of dH2O, collected each<br />

time by re-centrifugation, and then frozen. For each sub-sample,<br />

the supernatants from each wash were combined and frozen. All of<br />

the frozen samples (non-centrifuged sub-samples, and 12 000 × g<br />

pellets and supernatants) were subsequently lyophilised and the<br />

residues were re-suspended in 1.0 mL of methanol immediately<br />

prior to analysis.<br />

All of the methanol solutions were centrifuged briefly (10 min;<br />

1000×g) and aliquots were assayed using the modified procedure<br />

described above, to determine the recoveries of saponin and<br />

sapogenin (smilagenin) from non-centrifuged cRF suspensions<br />

and from supernatant.<br />

Experiment 2: Determination of saponin deglycosylation<br />

by mixed ruminal microbes<br />

Ruminal fluid was obtained from six Angus heifers maintained<br />

on a diet comprising 61 : 39 barley grain : alfalfa silage (w/w, dry<br />

matter basis) and supplemented with a dry powdered preparation<br />

of YS at 0, 20 or 60 g heifer −1 day −1 foratleast14dayspriorto<br />

this ruminal fluid collection. For experimentation, fluid from each<br />

of the two heifers per treatment was strained through four layers<br />

of cheesecloth and combined in equal volumes. Each sample<br />

was centrifuged (500 × g; 10min;25 ◦ C) to remove protozoa.<br />

The supernatant, denoted ‘defaunated ruminal fluid’ (dRF), was<br />

divided. One portion was centrifuged again (20 000 × g; 20min,<br />

4 ◦ C) whilst the other portion was held at 39 ◦ C under anaerobic<br />

conditions. This second supernatant was retained and referred to<br />

as ‘clarified ruminal fluid’ (cRF) and was kept at 39 ◦ C prior to use.<br />

Eight 1.0-mL aliquots of each type (dietary treatment) of dRF<br />

and cRF were dispensed into 2.0-mL vials, followed by 0.5 mL of YS<br />

saponin solution (1150 µg SEmL −1 in mineral buffer 19 and 40 µL<br />

of reducing solution (5.7% (w/v) Na2S·9H2Oin0.1molL −1 NaOH).<br />

All vials and YS saponin solutions were equilibrated to 39 ◦ Cin<br />

a water bath prior to use and all transfers were done under a<br />

streamofCO2. The vials were sealed and incubated anaerobically<br />

at 39 ◦ C for 4 h. Four of the eight vials for each treatment<br />

were transferred directly to −20 ◦ C storage (for subsequent<br />

lyophilisation). The other four vials were centrifuged (12 000 × g,<br />

20 min) after the incubation and 1.0 mL of supernatant from each<br />

vial was frozen for subsequent lyophilisation. As described above,<br />

each of the lyophilised residues was re-suspended in 1.0 mL of<br />

methanol and duplicate aliquots were assayed using the modified<br />

procedure. The difference between the concentration of total<br />

saponin+sapogenin determined in the whole mixture (lyophilized<br />

without centrifugation) and the concentration of soluble saponin<br />

remaining in the supernatant was considered to represent the<br />

portion of the saponin that had been deglycosylated to sapogenin.<br />

Experiment 3: Localizing enzymatic deglycosylation of<br />

steroidal saponin to extracellular or cell-associated enzyme<br />

rumen microbial enzyme fractions<br />

Ruminal fluid collected from the two donor steers in Experiment 1<br />

was processed as described above to produce 2.0 L of dRF, all of<br />

which was then centrifuged further to produce cRF. The cRF was<br />

then divided into two portions. One portion was used directly,<br />

and considered as the extracellular enzyme fraction (ECE). The<br />

second portion of cRF was autoclaved (115 ◦ C; 15 min) to inactivate<br />

enzymes. While this autoclaved cRF was cooling, one half of the<br />

pelleted material remaining from conversion of dRF to cRF was<br />

washed twice with 500 mL of 0.5 mmol L −1 phosphate buffer (pH<br />

7.0), re-harvested each time by centrifugation (20 000 × g;20min;<br />

4 ◦ C). This washed pellet was then re-suspended in the cooled,<br />

autoclaved cRF and sonicated (three 30-s pulses separated by<br />

15-s intervals; output 8, duty cycle 60–70%) using a Vibra-Cell <br />

processor (Sonics & Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) to disrupt<br />

bacterial cells. The resulting preparation was considered as the<br />

cell-associated enzyme fraction (CAE).<br />

The ECE and CAE fractions were dispensed (19-mL aliquots)<br />

into 45-mL serum vials, followed by 1.0 mL of mineral buffer 19<br />

or stock solutions of YS saponin in mineral buffer, which yielded<br />

final concentrations of 0, 240 or 480 µg SEmL −1 . Quadruplicate<br />

vials of each saponin concentration in each enzyme fraction<br />

were prepared. Sodium azide aqueous solution (0.1 mL) was also<br />

added to each vial to inhibit microbial growth (final concentration<br />

100 µgml −1 ). The serum vials were then sealed and incubated<br />

at 39 ◦ C with shaking (120 rpm). After 24 h, four 1.0-mL subsamples<br />

were withdrawn from each vial. As described above, two<br />

of these were immediately frozen, and the remaining two were<br />

centrifuged (12 000 × g, 20 min). The supernatants were collected<br />

and the pellets washed twice with 200 µL ofdH2O followed by<br />

centrifugation (12 000 × g, 20 min). Supernatants for each subsample<br />

were combined, and these and the pellets from each<br />

sample were frozen for subsequent lyophilisation. Each residue<br />

was re-suspended in 1.0 mL of methanol for analysis.<br />

The saponin remaining in the supernatant (liquid) fraction<br />

of the mixtures that were centrifuged was assumed to be<br />

steroidal saponin (soluble) whereas that detected in the pellet<br />

(solid) fraction after centrifugation was assumed to be the<br />

deglycosylated, insoluble sapogenin. The presence of sapogenin<br />

in the mixture prior to centrifugation and in supernatants and<br />

pellets after centrifugation was assessed by HPTLC, using the<br />

method described by Muzquiz et al. 20<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818 Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd<br />

1813


1814<br />

Calculations and statistical analyses<br />

In Experiment 1, OD425 readings, which reflected chromophores<br />

formed during reaction among sapogenin, p-anisaldehyde and<br />

sulfuric acid, were compared over a 24-h period between dH2Oand<br />

RF-based suspensions, and with and without dH2O added to<br />

the post-reaction mixture. In Experiments 2 and 3, recoveries of<br />

steroidal saponin were calculated on the basis of the amounts of<br />

saponin/sapogenin detected in various fractions as a proportion<br />

of the amount of saponin present initially. All data were analyzed<br />

statistically by analysis of variance using the MIXED procedure<br />

of SAS, 21 with individual vial or tube as a random factor. The<br />

significance of differences among treatments was tested using<br />

LSMEANS with the PDIFF option. 21<br />

RESULTS<br />

Experiment 1<br />

Addition of dH2O to the post-reaction mixture after a 10-min<br />

incubation in the water bath reduced (P < 0.01) interference from<br />

background color and improved (P < 0.01) the stability of the<br />

OD425 readings over 24-h period (Fig. 1). With no water added,<br />

OD425 readings increased (P < 0.01) between 0.5 and 24 h postreaction,<br />

whereas if 0.5 mL of dH2O had been added, the OD425<br />

readings remained essentially unchanged over this period. This<br />

response was observed both with smilagenin (Fig. 1A) and with<br />

OD 425<br />

OD 425<br />

A 2.4<br />

2.0<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

2.8<br />

2.4<br />

2.0<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

Recovered from dH 2 O<br />

Recovered from pcRF<br />

No H 2O added<br />

0.0<br />

0 8 16 24 32 40<br />

Smilagenin added (µg mL-1 )<br />

www.soci.org Y Wang, TA McAllister<br />

YS saponin (Fig. 1B), irrespective of their having been recovered<br />

from suspension in dH2OorinpcRF.<br />

The utility of centrifugation as a means of separating sapogenin<br />

from saponin was confirmed. After saponin or sapogenin<br />

suspensions in cRF were centrifuged, essentially all saponin measured<br />

in the whole (uncentrifuged) mixture remained detectable<br />

in the supernatant, whereas virtually no sapogenin (smilagenin<br />

equivalents) was present in the supernatant (Table 1). Nearly all<br />

(>99%) of the saponin and sapogenin added to cRF was recoverable<br />

from the non-centrifuged mixture. Rates of recovery from<br />

cRF were similar across steroidal sapogenin concentrations of<br />

250–1000 µgmL −1 , and between saponin concentrations of 450<br />

and 500 µgSEmL −1 .<br />

Experiment 2<br />

Patterns of recovery of YS saponins added to dRF or cRF were<br />

unaffected by the ruminal fluid donor heifers having been fed<br />

powdered Y. schidigera (0 vs. 20 or 60 g day −1 ; Table 2). When<br />

the mixtures were assayed without centrifugation, all of the YS<br />

saponin (99.1 to 100.6%) added to dRF or cRF was detected<br />

as steroidal saponin+sapogenin. In contrast, measurement of<br />

steroidal saponin in the supernatant fraction of the incubations<br />

was greatly reduced (P < 0.01) in dRF (58.5% recovered), as<br />

compared with cRF (98.7% recovered).<br />

Recovered from dH 2 O<br />

Recovered from pcRF<br />

H 2 O added post-reaction<br />

0.5 h<br />

2.0 h<br />

6.0 h<br />

24 h<br />

0 8 16 24 32 40<br />

Smilagenin added (µg mL-1 )<br />

Figure 1. Stabilization of chromophore development (OD425) during colorimetric determination of (A) smilagenin or (B) saponin from Y. schidigera that<br />

had been recovered from solution in dH2O or in partially clarified ruminal fluid (pcRF). Values shown are means of quadruplicate determinations. Bars<br />

representing standard error fell within symbols.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd


Assay for saponin deglycosylation www.soci.org<br />

B<br />

OD 425<br />

OD 425<br />

2.4<br />

2.0<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

0.0<br />

2.4<br />

2.0<br />

1.6<br />

1.2<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

Figure 1. (Continued).<br />

Recovered from dH 2O<br />

Recovered from pcRF<br />

No H 2O added<br />

0.0<br />

0 8 16 24 32 40<br />

Saponin added (µg SE mL-1 )<br />

Table 1. Recoveries (%) of Y. schidigera steroidal saponin or of<br />

smilagenin (as a model sapogenin) from solution/suspension in<br />

clarified ruminal fluid a<br />

Substance<br />

added<br />

Original<br />

concentration<br />

(µgmL−1 )<br />

Fraction assayed b<br />

Whole<br />

mixture Supernatant<br />

Extracted saponins YS 450 99.69 ± 0.83 99.38 ± 0.51<br />

500 100.26 ± 0.42 99.57 ± 0.54<br />

Smilagenin 250 99.81 ± 0.27 ND<br />

500 99.85 ± 0.32 ND<br />

750 101.26 ± 0.30 ND<br />

1000 99.95 ± 0.24 0.01 ± 0.02<br />

a Clarified ruminal fluid (cRF) was the supernatant obtained by<br />

centrifuging cheesecloth-filtered ruminal fluid at 20 000 × g for 20 min<br />

at 4 ◦ C.<br />

b Assays (n = 4) were conducted either on the entire solutions/suspensions<br />

in cRF (whole mixture) or on supernatant produced<br />

by centrifugation of the mixtures at 12 000 × g for 20 min at 4 ◦ C.<br />

ND, not detected.<br />

Experiment 3<br />

Consistent with observations from Experiment 2, virtually all of<br />

the added YS saponin was recovered as total saponin+sapogenin<br />

from incubations in ECE or in CAE, when the 24-h incubation<br />

mixtures were assayed whole (Table 3). When vial contents were<br />

Recovered from dH 2 O<br />

Recovered from pcRF<br />

H 2O added post-reaction<br />

0.5 h<br />

2.0 h<br />

6.0 h<br />

24 h<br />

0 8 16 24 32 40<br />

Saponin added (µg SE mL-1 )<br />

centrifuged, however, recovery of saponin from the supernatant<br />

and pellet fractions of ECE differed substantially (P < 0.001)<br />

from the recoveries in fractionated CAE. After 24 h of incubation,<br />

>88% of the saponin added to ECE remained detectable in the<br />

supernatant fraction (i.e. as saponin) whereas with CAE, ≤32%<br />

of the added saponin was detected in supernatant. Accordingly,<br />

much less (P < 0.001) of the added saponin was detected in<br />

the pellet fraction with ECE than with CAE (average 6.45% vs.<br />

79.5%, respectively). Both in ECE and CAE suspensions, additive<br />

recoveries (i.e. recovery in supernatant + recovery in pellet) were<br />

similar (P > 0.05) to the total saponin+sapogenin analyzed in<br />

whole mixtures. In CAE suspensions, with saponin added at 240<br />

or at 480 µg SEmL −1 ), both calculated and analysed recoveries<br />

exceeded 100%, and they were higher (P < 0.05) than recoveries<br />

from incubations with ECE.<br />

No band corresponding to steroidal sapogenin from the<br />

extracted YS saponin was observed during HPTLC analysis of<br />

ECE incubations at 0 or 24 h. This was also the case with CAE<br />

incubation at 0 h (Fig. 2), but the characteristic yellow band was<br />

clearly evident in the analysis of CAE incubation after 24 h, and it<br />

was detected mainly in the pellet fraction, rather than supernatant<br />

(data not shown).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Effect of adding dH2O to the post-reaction mixture<br />

The chromophore measured in this assay develops from the<br />

reaction of steroidal sapogenin, p-anisaldehyde and sulfuric acid<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818 Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd<br />

1815


1816<br />

Table 2. Recoveries (%) of steroidal saponin suspended in ruminal<br />

fluid fractions and incubated anaerobically for 4 h at 39 ◦ C(n = 4)<br />

Mixture incubated<br />

Donor<br />

animal<br />

dietb Whole<br />

mixture<br />

Material assayed a<br />

www.soci.org Y Wang, TA McAllister<br />

Mixture<br />

supernatant<br />

YS saponins in dRF c YS-0 98.1 ± 1.25 57.3 ± 1.21<br />

YS-20 102.5 ± 1.56 59.6 ± 2.02<br />

YS-60 98.8 ± 1.01 58.7 ± 1.15<br />

Average 99.1 58.5<br />

YS saponins in cRF c YS-0 99.3 ± 1.03 99.3 ± 1.72<br />

YS-20 101.9 ± 0.58 98.7 ± 1.35<br />

YS-60 100.7 ± 1.34 98.2 ± 2.06<br />

Average 100.6 98.7<br />

a Immediately following the 4-h incubation, four of the eight replicate<br />

reaction tubes were assayed directly. The other four were centrifuged<br />

(12 000 × g;20min;4 ◦ C) and supernatant was assayed.<br />

b Ruminal fluid donors were fed daily amounts of 0, 20 or 60 g of<br />

powdered Yuccaschidigera for >14 day prior to ruminal fluid collection.<br />

Fluidsfromthetwoheiferspertreatmentwerepooledinequalvolumes.<br />

c Pooled ruminal fluid was centrifuged (500×g;10min;4 ◦ C) to remove<br />

protozoa. dRF is the defaunated supernatant. A portion of the dRF was<br />

re-centrifuged (20 000 × g;20min;4 ◦ C), yielding clarified supernatant,<br />

cRF.<br />

in ethyl acetate, and its formation is not impeded by sugars,<br />

sterols, fatty acids or vegetable oils. 12 In this study, the similar color<br />

development (OD425) per unit of steroidal sapogenin or saponin<br />

between dH2O- and RF-suspended samples indicates that residual<br />

compounds in cRF also did not interfere with chromophore<br />

formation. However, background absorbance was observed<br />

both in dH2O and in RF samples that contained no steroidal<br />

saponin/sapogenin, and this background color intensified with<br />

time. The origin of this background color is not known, but<br />

its presence in aqueous incubations indicates it was not likely<br />

specific to ruminal fluid. We did notice that mixing concentrated<br />

sulfuric acid with reagents in the absence of sapogenin gave<br />

rise to a red color that intensified with time. Possibly, this<br />

phenomenon is the source of the background interference. Baccou<br />

et al. 12 also observed that a mixture of concentrated sulfuric acid,<br />

p-anisaldehyde and acetic acid rapidly developed a dark red color.<br />

The present study showed that adding an additional 0.5 mL dH2O<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Std YS cRF<br />

ECE-0 ECE-24 CAE-0 CAE-24<br />

Figure 2. High performance thin layer chromatographic separation of<br />

(lane 1) smilagenin standard (as model sapogenin) in ethanol; (lane 2)<br />

extracted Yucca schidigera saponin (YS) in methanol; (lane 3) clarified<br />

ruminal fluid; and (lanes 4–7) mixtures of YS (480 µgmL −1 )after0hor<br />

24 h of incubation in (lanes 4 and 5) the extracellular enzyme (ECE) fraction<br />

or (lanes 6 and 7) the cell-associated enzyme (CAE) fraction prepared from<br />

ruminal fluid. Arrows near lanes 1 and 7 indicates yellow-pigmented bands<br />

corresponding to sapogenin.<br />

to the mixtures subsequent to the 10-min incubation at 60 ◦ C<br />

stabilized the chromophore, likely through formation of a stable<br />

hydrate, and substantially reduced background interference. The<br />

reason for this reduction in interference is not known, but further<br />

dilution of the sulfuric acid (0.5 mL dH2O added to 0.5 mL of<br />

H2SO4 present in each 4-mL reaction mixture) may have impeded<br />

oxidation of component(s) in the reaction mixture that gave rise<br />

to background interference.<br />

Centrifugation for separating sapogenin from saponin<br />

and its biological implications<br />

The markedly different detection patterns of YS saponin and smilagenin<br />

(as a model sapogenin) in ruminal fluid with and without<br />

centrifugation (Experiment 1), together with virtually complete recovery<br />

across a range of added concentrations, confirmed that<br />

centrifugation would be effective for distinguishing between<br />

soluble (glycosylated) steroidal saponin and its insoluble, deglycosylated<br />

analog, sapogenin. We observed similar partitioning<br />

Table 3. Recoveries (%) of steroidal saponin added to ruminal fluid enzyme fractions a following 24 h of anaerobic incubation at 39 ◦ C(n = 4)<br />

Enzyme fraction and original saponin (SE) concentration<br />

Extracellular enzymes (ECE) Cell-associated enzymes (CAE)<br />

Material assayed b 240 480 240 480<br />

Whole mixture 96.4 ± 1.19 97.3 ± 1.23 109.1 ± 1.21 106.2 ± 0.71<br />

Supernatant (S) 88.5 ± 1.19 89.6 ± 1.46 25.7 ± 0.48 31.8 ± 1.84<br />

Pellets (P) 7.4 ± 1.22 5.5 ± 1.19 82.2 ± 1.61 76.8 ± 1.92<br />

Total (S + P) 95.9 ± 1.23 95.1 ± 1.62 107.9±1.96 108.6 ± 2.25<br />

a Pooled ruminal fluid was centrifuged (20 000 × g; 20min;4 ◦ C), yielding clarified supernatant, half of which was used for assay, considered as<br />

the extracellular enzyme fraction (ECE). Half of the pelleted material was re-suspended in the remaining half of the supernatant, which had been<br />

autoclaved and cooled. This resuspension was sonicated to disrupt cells, and was considered as the cell-associated enzyme fraction (CAE).<br />

b Immediately following the 24 h incubation, sub-samples from each of the quadruplicate reaction tubes were assayed directly (whole mixture), or<br />

after centrifugation (12 000 × g;20min;4 ◦ C) and supernatant and pellets were assayed separately.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd


Assay for saponin deglycosylation www.soci.org<br />

when sapogenin and saponin were suspended in water (Wang,<br />

unpublished data). The association of sapogenin with the precipitate<br />

likely reflects its hydrophobic nature, whereas hydrophilic<br />

steroidal saponin (MW ∼1300, depending on the number of<br />

sugars it contains) remained in the supernatant fraction after<br />

centrifugation.<br />

Experiment 2 confirmed that in the absence of ruminal bacteria<br />

(i.e. in cRF), the solubility of YS saponin did not change during<br />

the 4-h incubation, whereas when ruminal bacteria were present<br />

(in dRF) during the incubation, a portion of the YS saponins<br />

were no longer detectable in supernatant after 4 h, i.e. they had<br />

become insoluble. Together with the findings from Experiment 1,<br />

namely, that glycosylated saponins were soluble, whereas the nonglycosylated<br />

smilagenin was not, these observations suggest that<br />

the decrease in recovery of YS saponins from dRF supernatant<br />

represents the portion that were deglycosylated by ruminal<br />

bacteria or otherwise precipitated by ruminal compounds such<br />

as soluble protein. Saponins are known to react with proteins,<br />

and the stability of a saponin–protein complex is influenced by<br />

characteristics of the protein as well as the saponin. 22–25 Soluble<br />

protein contents of the cRF from YS-0, YS-20 and YS-60 (Table 2)<br />

were 1.2, 1.5 and 1.6 mg mL −1 , respectively (measured as bovine<br />

serum albumin equivalents). However, the complete recovery of<br />

added saponin from cRF supernatant suggests that the soluble<br />

proteins in RF used in this experiment had little effect on the<br />

solubility of steroidal saponins. Thus, the difference between total<br />

saponin+sapogenin in the whole (uncentrifuged) mixture and the<br />

saponin that remained in supernatant following centrifugation<br />

was assumed to represent that portion of saponin deglycosylated<br />

to sapogenin. The fact that the pellet fraction contained sapogenin<br />

was confirmed by the results from HPTLC in Experiment 3.<br />

<strong>Research</strong> has shown that the effects of steroidal saponins<br />

on ruminal microbes are species-specific. 4,5 Steroidal saponins<br />

are known to react with membrane sterols, disrupt membrane<br />

function and consequently arrest cell growth. 15,26,27 Sapogenin<br />

was suggested as the region of the saponin that exerts these<br />

biological effects. 28 Sapogenins, however, are hydrophobic; it is<br />

the hydrophilic sugar moiety that renders the steroidal saponin<br />

molecule soluble in aqueous environments. Segal et al. 29 proposed<br />

that after a saponin contacts a cell membrane, β-glycosidase(s)<br />

in the membrane hydrolyse the glycosidic bond in the saponin<br />

molecule, releasing the sapogenin to combine with membrane<br />

sterols. Saponins, therefore, are the biologically active form of<br />

sapogenins.<br />

The antifungal properties of steroidal saponins are lost upon<br />

their deglycosylation. 16,17 Similarly, in a preliminary study, we also<br />

found that growth of rumen cellulolytic bacteria was unaffected by<br />

purified smilagenin or sarsasapogenin (Wang et al., unpublished<br />

data). It is reasonable to assume, therefore, that saponin present<br />

in a ruminal supernatant fraction (i.e. soluble) would be in a<br />

biologically active form, and that a post-incubation decrease in<br />

recovery of saponin from the supernatant of a ruminal culture<br />

would reflect a loss of solubility attributable to deglycosylation<br />

during exposure to microbial enzymes and presumably, a loss of<br />

biological activity.<br />

Degradation of steroidal saponin by rumen microbes<br />

The complete recovery of steroidal saponin added to dRF or cRF<br />

in Experiment 2, measured as total saponin + sapogenininwhole<br />

mixture, suggests that the steroidal sapogenin aglycone core<br />

structure was not degraded by the activities present in dRF or in<br />

cRF, a result that is consistent with our previous research. 2 This<br />

finding also agrees with other reports that rumen microbes are<br />

capable of deglycosylating steroidal saponin to sapogenin, but<br />

are unable to degrade the sapogenin aglycone structure. 30–32<br />

In this study, protozoa had been removed both from dRF and<br />

from cRF. Further, cRF would also have been nearly devoid of bacteria<br />

as a result of centrifugation at 20 000 × g. Thus the difference<br />

in recoveries of saponin from supernatant of dRF incubations vs.<br />

cRF incubations, i.e. 58% vs. 99%, suggests that ruminal bacteria<br />

were responsible for this insolubilization of saponin. Irreversible<br />

adsorption of saponin to cell membranes occurs rapidly 33 and is<br />

a prerequisite for its deglycosylation to sapogenin by membraneassociated<br />

β-glucosidase. 29 Interestingly, in the present study, the<br />

similar recoveries of total saponin+sapogenin (in whole mixture)<br />

and of saponin (in supernatant) from cRF and dRF incubations<br />

between donor heifers fed and not fed YS saponin suggests that<br />

the deglycosylase activity of rumen bacteria had not been altered<br />

over the course of their prior exposure to YS saponin. The adaptation<br />

of ruminants to saponins observed as a result of prolonged<br />

dietary exposure 10,11,34 is apparently due to mechanisms other<br />

than an increase in the deglycosylase activity of rumen bacteria.<br />

The glycosidic composition or linkages in the saponin molecules<br />

may play a role in this adaptation. Wang et al. 5 also observed no<br />

effect of pre-exposure to YS steroidal saponin on bacterial growth.<br />

In the present study, rumen protozoa were removed by centrifugation,<br />

thus the nature or extent of their role in the adaptation of<br />

microbial populations to saponins is not known.<br />

Deglycosylation of steroidal saponin by cell-associated<br />

and extra-cellular enzymes<br />

Experiment 2 demonstrated that prior exposure to YS steroidal<br />

saponin did not affect deglycosylation of saponins by ruminal<br />

bacteria, thus for Experiment 3 we utilized ruminal content from<br />

the steers with no exposure to YS. The finding that significant<br />

amounts of sapogenin were obtained only with CAE and not with<br />

ECE demonstrates that the deglycosylating activity of rumen<br />

bacteria is mainly cell-associated. This is consistent with the<br />

finding in Experiment 2 that cell-free supernatant (cRF), whether<br />

from pre-exposed or non-exposed heifers, exhibited limited<br />

deglycosylase activity. Previous research has determined that<br />

saponin deglycosylation is accomplished by β-glycosidases. 15,35,36<br />

Segal et al. 29 and Segal and Schlösser 15 observed conversion<br />

of saponins into their corresponding aglycones by various<br />

membrane-associated glycosidases of erythrocytes and fungi, and<br />

glycosidase activity associated with plant cell membranes has<br />

also been observed. 37 Rumen bacterial glycosidase activity was<br />

reportedbyWilliamset al. 38 Thus,thedeglycosylationofsaponinto<br />

sapogenin observed in this study is likely attributable to bacterial<br />

cell-associated glycosidases. This finding, in turn, supports the<br />

conclusion from Experiment 2 that adaptation of ruminal bacteria<br />

to YS saponin does notarise from increased bacterial deglycosylase<br />

activity. Enhancement of that activity, presumably cell-associated,<br />

would result in conversion of more saponin to sapogenin in the<br />

vicinity of the cells, and therefore amplify the negative impact of<br />

sapogenin on bacterial cells.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

A previously established colorimetric method 12 for saponin determination<br />

was modified to stabilize chromophore development,<br />

enabling OD425 values to be recorded earlier and over longer<br />

periods with no loss of repeatability. A simple procedure was established<br />

to estimate the deglycosylation of steroidal saponin to<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818 Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd<br />

1817


1818<br />

sapogenin by ruminal microbes. The procedure consisted of measuring<br />

total steroidal saponin+sapogenin in whole culture and the<br />

levels of steroidal saponin that remained in the supernatant after<br />

centrifugation (12 000×g, 20 min) using the modified spectrophotometric<br />

method. This study demonstrated that rumen bacteria<br />

are capable of deglycosylating steroidal saponin to sapogenin,<br />

but do not degrade the sapogenin core structure. Deglycosylase<br />

activity in rumen bacteria is mainly cell-associated. Pre-exposure<br />

to steroidal saponins did not alter the saponin-deglycosylating<br />

capacity of rumen bacteria, suggesting that ruminal adaptation to<br />

saponins occurs via another mechanism.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was conducted with financial support from Agriculture<br />

and Agri-Food Canada. The authors appreciate the assistance<br />

of Katherine Jakober and Sheila Torgunrud. This is Lethbridge<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Centre contribution number 38709007.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Wang Y, McAllister TA, Newbold CJ, Rode LM, Cheeke PR and<br />

Cheng KJ, Effect of Yucca schidigera extract on fermentation<br />

and degradation of steroidal saponins in the rumen simulation<br />

technique (RUSITEC). Anim Feed Sci Technol 74:143–153 (1998).<br />

2 Wang Y, McAllister TA, Yanke LJ, Xu ZJ, Cheeke PR and Cheng KJ,<br />

In vitro effect of steroidal saponins from Yucca schidigera extract on<br />

ruminal microbial protein synthesis and ruminal fermentation. JSci<br />

Food Agric 80:2114–2122 (2000).<br />

3 Wina E, Muetzel S, Hoffman E, Makkar HPS and Becker K, Saponins<br />

containing methanol extract of Sapindus rarak affect microbial<br />

fermentation, microbial activity and microbial community structure<br />

in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol 121:159–174 (2005).<br />

4 Wallace RJ, Arthauo L and Newbold CJ, Influence of Yucca shidigera<br />

extract on ruminal ammonia concentrations and ruminal<br />

microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1762–1767 (1994).<br />

5 Wang Y, McAllister TA, Yanke LJ and Cheeke PR, Effect of steroidal<br />

saponins from Yucca schidigera extract on ruminal microbes. J Appl<br />

Microbiol 88:887–896 (2000).<br />

6 Wina E, Muetzel S and Becker K, The dynamics of major fibrolytic<br />

microbes and enzyme activity in the rumen in response to short<br />

and long-term feeding of Sapindus rarak saponins. J Appl Microbiol<br />

100:114–122 (2006).<br />

7 Wilson RC, Overton TR and Clark JH, Effects of Yucca schidigera extract<br />

and soluble protein on performance of cows and concentrations of<br />

urea nitrogen in plasma and milk. JDairySci81:1022–1027 (1998).<br />

8 Wang Y, Greer D and McAllister TA, Effects of moisture, roller setting<br />

and saponin-based surfactant on barley processing, ruminal<br />

degradation and growth performance of feedlot steers. JAnim<br />

Sci 81:2145–2154 (2003).<br />

9 Gorgulu M, Yurtseven S, Unsal I and Kutle HR, Effect of Yucca powder<br />

on fattening performance male lambs. Appl Anim Res 25:33–36<br />

(2004).<br />

10 Newbold CJ, El-Hassan SM, Wang J, Ortega ME and Wallace RJ,<br />

Influence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity<br />

of rumen protozoa and bacteria. Br J Nutr 78:237–249 (1997).<br />

11 Ivan M, Koenig KM, Teferedegne B, Newbold CJ, Entz T, Rode LM, et al,<br />

Effect of the dietary Enterolobium cyclocarpum foliage on the<br />

population dynamics of rumen ciliate protozoa in sheep. Small<br />

Rum Res 52:81–91 (2004).<br />

12 Baccou JC, Lambert F and Sauvaire Y, Spectrophotometric method<br />

for the determination of total steroidal sapogenin. Analyst<br />

102:458–465 (1977).<br />

13 Makkar HPS and Becker K, Degradation of quillaja saponins by mixed<br />

culture of rumen microbes. Lett Appl Microbiol 25:243–245 (1997).<br />

14 Flåøyen A, Wilkins AL, Deng D and Brekke T, Ovine metabolism of<br />

saponins: Evaluation of a method for estimating the ovine uptake<br />

of steroidal saponins from Narthecium ossifragum. Vet Res Commun<br />

25:225–238 (2001).<br />

www.soci.org Y Wang, TA McAllister<br />

15 Segal R and Schlösser E, Role of glycosidases in the membranlytic,<br />

antifungal action of saponins. Arch Microbiol 104:147–150 (1975).<br />

16 Arneson PA and Durbin RD, Studies on the mode of action of tomatine<br />

as a fungitoxic agent. Plant Physiol 43:683–686 (1968).<br />

17 Mahato SB, Ganguly AN and Sahu NP, Steroid saponins. Phytochemistry<br />

21:959–978 (1982).<br />

18 Canadian Council on Animal Care, Guide to the Care and Use<br />

of Experimental Animals, 2nd edn., vol. 1, ed. by Olfert ED,<br />

Cross BM and McWilliam AA. [Online]. CCAC, Ottawa, ON. Available:<br />

http://www.ccac.ca/en/CCAC Programs/Guidelines Policies/<br />

GUIDES/ENGLISH/toc v1.htm [16 December 2009].<br />

19 Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D and Schneider W.<br />

The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy<br />

content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when<br />

they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J Agric Sci (Cambr.)<br />

93:217–222 (1979).<br />

20 Muzquiz M, Ridout CL, Price KR and Fenwick GR, The saponin content<br />

and composition of sweet and bitter lupin seed. J Sci Food Agric<br />

63:47–52 (1993).<br />

21 SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC (1999).<br />

22 Potter SM, Jimenez-Flores R, Pollack J, Lone TA and Berber-<br />

Jimened MD, Protein–saponin interaction and its influence on<br />

blood lipids. J Agric Food Chem 41:1287–1291 (1993).<br />

23 Tanaka M, Fang-I L, Ishizaki S and Taguchi T, Interaction of saponins<br />

with salt soluble proteins from walleye pollack meat. Fisheries Sci<br />

61:373–374 (1995).<br />

24 Ikedo S, Shimoyamada M and Watanabe K, Interaction between<br />

bovine serum albumin and saponin as studied by heat stability<br />

and protease digestion. J Agric Food Chem 44:792–795 (1996).<br />

25 Shimoyamada M, Ootsubo R, Naruse T and Watanabe K. Effects of<br />

soybean saponin on protease hydrolyses of β-lactoglobulin and<br />

α-lactalbumin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 64:891–893 (2000).<br />

26 Bangham AD, Horne RW, Glauert AM, Dingle JT and Lucy JA, Action of<br />

saponin on biological cell membranes. Nature 196:952–955 (1962).<br />

27 Price KR, Johnson IT and Fenwick GR, The chemistry and biological<br />

significance of saponins in foods and feedstuffs. CRC Crit Rev Food<br />

Sci Nutr 26:27–135 (1987).<br />

28 Segal R, Mansour M and Zaitschek DV, Effect of ester groups on the<br />

haemolytic action of some saponins and sapogenins. Biochem<br />

Pharmacol 15:1411–1416 (1966).<br />

29 Segal R, Shatkovsky P and Milo-Goldzweig I, On the mechanism of<br />

saponin hemolysis – I. Hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond. Biochem<br />

Pharmacol 23:973–981 (1974).<br />

30 Flåøyen A and Wilkins AL, Metabolism of saponins from Narthecium<br />

ossifragum – a plant implicated in the aetiology of alveld, a<br />

hepatogenous photosensitization of sheep. Vet Res Commun<br />

21:335–345 (1997).<br />

31 Meagher LP, Smith BL and Wilkins AL, Metabolism of diosgeninderived<br />

saponins: Implication for hepatogenous photosensitization<br />

diseases in ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 91:157–170 (2001).<br />

32 Flåøyen A, Wilkins AL and Sandvik M, Rumen metabolism in sheep<br />

of saponins from Yucca schidigera. Vet Res Commun 26:159–169<br />

(2002).<br />

33 Segal R, Milo-Goldzweig I and Seiffe M, The haemolytic properties of<br />

non-ionic hemolysins. Life Sci 11:61–70 (1972).<br />

34 Teferedegne B, McIntosh F, Osuji PO, Odenyo A, Wallace RJ and<br />

Newbold CJ, Influence of foliage from different accessions of the<br />

subtropical leguminous tree, Sesbania sesban on rumen protozoa<br />

in Ethiopian and Scottish sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 78:11–20<br />

(1999).<br />

35 Matsuura H. Saponins in garlic as modifiers of the risk of cardiovascular<br />

disease. JNutr131:1000S–1005S (2001).<br />

36 Yang DJ, Lu TJ and Hwang LS. Effect of endogenous glycosidase<br />

on stability of steroidal saponins in Taiwanese yam (Dioscorea<br />

pseudojaponica yamamoto) during drying processes. Food Chem<br />

113:155–159 (2009).<br />

37 Grünweller S and Kesselmeier J. Characterization of a membrane<br />

bound beta-glucosidase responsible for the activation of oat leaf<br />

saponins. Phytochemistry 24:1941–1943 (1985).<br />

38 Williams AG, Withers SE and Coleman GS. Glycoside hydrolases of<br />

rumen bacteria and protozoa. Curr Microbiol 10:287–294 (1984).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa Copyright c○ 2010 Crown in the right of Canada. J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1811–1818<br />

Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 22 January 2010 Revised: 23 April 2010 Accepted: 26 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 3 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4020<br />

Impact of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration<br />

of an industrial fish protein hydrolysate on its<br />

bioactive properties<br />

Laurent Picot, a∗ Rozenn Ravallec, b Martine Fouchereau-Péron, c Laurent<br />

Vandanjon, d,e Pascal Jaouen, d Maryse Chaplain-Derouiniot, d Fabienne<br />

Guérard, f Aurélie Chabeaud, f Yves LeGal, c Oscar Martinez Alvarez, c,g<br />

Jean-Pascal Bergé, h Jean-Marie Piot, a Irineu Batista, i Carla Pires, i Gudjon<br />

Thorkelsson, j,k Charles Delannoy, l Greta Jakobsen, m Inez Johansson m<br />

and Patrick Bourseau d,e<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated that in vitro controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of fish and shellfish proteins<br />

leads to bioactive peptides. Ultrafiltration (UF) and/or nanofiltration (NF) can be used to refine hydrolysates and also to<br />

fractionate them in order to obtain a peptide population enriched in selected sizes. This study was designed to highlight the<br />

impact of controlled UF and NF on the stability of biological activities of an industrial fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) and to<br />

understand whether fractionation could improve its content in bioactive peptides.<br />

RESULTS: The starting fish protein hydrolysate exhibited a balanced amino acid composition, a reproducible molecular weight<br />

(MW) profile, and a low sodium chloride content, allowing the study of its biological activity. Successive fractionation on UF and<br />

NF membranes allowed concentration of peptides of selected sizes, without, however, carrying out sharp separations, some MW<br />

classes beingfound in several fractions. Peptides containingPro, Hyp, Aspand Glu were concentrated in the UF and NF retentates<br />

compared to the unfractionated hydrolysate and UF permeate, respectively. Gastrin/cholecystokinin-like peptides were present<br />

in the starting FPH, UF and NF fractions, but fractionation did not increase their concentration. In contrast, quantification<br />

of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-like peptides demonstrated an increase in CGRP-like activities in the UF permeate,<br />

relative to the starting FPH. The starting hydrolysate also showed a potent antioxidant and radical scavenging activity, and a<br />

moderate angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-1 inhibitory activity, which were not increased by UF and NF fractionation.<br />

CONCLUSION: Fractionation of an FPH using membrane separation, with a molecular weight cut-off adapted to the peptide<br />

composition, may provide an effective means to concentrate CGRP-like peptides and peptides enriched in selected amino<br />

acids. The peptide size distribution observed after UF and NF fractionation demonstrates that it is misleading to characterize<br />

the fractions obtained by membrane filtration according to the MW cut-off of the membrane only, as is currently done in the<br />

literature.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: fish protein hydrolysate; ultrafiltration; nanofiltration; membrane separation; fractionation process; bioactive peptide<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Peptides resulting from natural digestion or controlled enzymatic<br />

hydrolysisoffoodproteinsexhibitnotonlynutritionalactivitiesbut<br />

also biological activities of dietary or pharmacological interest. 1,2<br />

Following ingestion, proteins are hydrolysed in the stomach by HCl<br />

and pepsins and, to a lesser extent, in the upper partof the intestine<br />

by trypsin and chymotrysin. The resulting enzymatic hydrolysate<br />

mostly consists of a mixture of free amino acids and dipeptides,<br />

able to bind gastric receptors on mucosal cells, and to be resorbed<br />

via a transcellular transport across the intestinal brush border<br />

cells, as demonstrated using synthetic oligopeptides. 3,4 Beyond<br />

this classical paradigm, it was demonstrated that oligopeptides<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Laurent Picot, UMR CNRS 6250 LIENSs, Université de La Rochelle,<br />

La Rochelle, France. E-mail: laurent.picot@univ-lr.fr<br />

a UMR CNRS 6250 LIENSs, Université de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France<br />

b ProBioGEM, UPRES EA-1026, IUT A-Polytech’Lille, USTL, Lille, France<br />

c UMR BOREA (Biologie des Organismes et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques), MNHN/CNRS<br />

7208/IRD 207/UPMC, Station de Biologie Marine, Concarneau, France<br />

d UMR CNRS 6144 GEPEA, Université deNantes,Saint-Nazaire,France<br />

e LIMATB, Université deBretagneSud,Lorient,France<br />

f ANTiOX, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Quimper, France<br />

g CSIC, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto del Frío, Madrid,<br />

Spain<br />

h IFREMER, STAM, Nantes, France<br />

i Ipimar, Lisbon, Portugal<br />

j Matis ohf, Reykjavik, Iceland<br />

k University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland<br />

l Copalis, Boulogne sur Mer, France<br />

m Marinova, Højmark, Denmark<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1819–1826 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1819


1820<br />

can also cross the intestinal border following a transepithelial route<br />

or oligopeptides transporters. 5,6 Some factors such as intraluminal<br />

hypertonicity increase this process. 7<br />

In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that enzymatic hydrolysis<br />

of dietary proteins leads to bioactive peptides such as growth<br />

factors, 8 immunomodulators, 9 antimicrobial, 10 antithrombotic, 11<br />

angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-1 inhibitors, 12 opiates or<br />

antiproliferative peptides. 13 <strong>Research</strong> focused on peptides contained<br />

in fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) demonstrated that they<br />

also contain molecules showing promising health benefits for<br />

nutritional or pharmaceutical applications. 14–16 Only few studies<br />

were performed to confirm the in vivo biological activity of FPH<br />

peptides, but convincing data were obtained on relevant animal<br />

models, e.g. spontaneously hypertensive or diabetic rats. For instance,<br />

in vitro 17–19 and in vivo studies on hypertensive rats 20–22<br />

demonstrated that pollack flesh or tuna muscle peptides inhibit<br />

ACE-1 and decrease blood pressure. The in vivo hypotensive activity<br />

of a short peptide identified in a sardine muscle hydrolysate<br />

was also demonstrated in humans by a dietary study on mild<br />

hypertensive subjects. 23<br />

Fish and shellfish peptides could also contribute to free radical<br />

scavenging and pathology prevention. 24 Peptides obtained from<br />

shrimp by-products, 25 hoki, 26 tuna backbone proteins, 27 jumbo<br />

squid skin gelatine, 28,29 conger eel muscle 30 and yellow stripe<br />

trevally 31 exert a significant in vitro antioxidant activity. Most<br />

antioxidant peptides identified are short (5–16 amino acids),<br />

contain hydrophobic amino acids, Val and Leu, at the N-terminus<br />

and Pro, His or Tyr in their sequence. 14 Tyrosines substantially<br />

contributetothescavengingoffreeradicalsbecausetheirphenolic<br />

lateral chains act as potent electron donors, 28,29,32 thus allowing<br />

the termination of the radical chain reaction. 31,33<br />

FPH have also been identified as a source of<br />

hormonal peptides, 34–39 particularly those able to bind gastrin/cholecystokinin<br />

(CCK) and calcitonin gene-related peptide<br />

(CGRP) receptors. FPH peptides also cross-react with specific<br />

antibodies directed against these hormones. Gastrointestinal secretagogue<br />

peptides such as gastrin/CCK 34–36 exhibit a large<br />

spectrum of activities ranging from the stimulation of protein<br />

synthesis 37 to the control of intestinal mobility and secretion of<br />

digestive enzymes. 40 Involvement of CCK-8 in the satiety mechanisms<br />

controlling food intake in humans is well documented, 41,42<br />

and the gastric localization of gastrin and CCK receptors suggests<br />

that dietary peptides acting as agonists on these receptors could<br />

be of interest as satietogenic ingredients in functional food. CGRP<br />

is a neuropeptide synthesized by alternative splicing of the calcitonin<br />

gene 38 and regulating a large number of physiological<br />

functions such as vasodilatation, gastric acid secretion and cardiac<br />

metabolism. 39,43 Binding of CGRP to its receptors reduces acidic<br />

secretion and the risk of ulceration, suggesting that peptides<br />

acting as CGRP receptor agonists could be of pharmacological<br />

interest. 44,45<br />

Several studies refer to the use of ultrafiltration (UF) in order<br />

to refine hydrolysates and to increase their specific activity in the<br />

perspective of industrial upgrading of by-products to produce<br />

bioactive ingredients for human food or animal feeding. The<br />

specific activity of UF fractions is then compared with that of<br />

the initial hydrolysate, with the aim of identifying the most<br />

active fractions. Several hydrolysates from different substrates<br />

have been fractionated in this way at the Pukyong National<br />

University in Pusan, South Korea: hot washing waters of cod<br />

frame proteins, 46 Alaska pollack frame proteins, 47 jumbo squid<br />

skin gelatine, 28 giant squid muscle, 48 hoki frame proteins 26 and<br />

www.soci.org L Picot et al.<br />

conger eel muscle. 30 Activities tested are generally antioxidant and<br />

antihypertensive, but radical scavenging activities and foaming<br />

or emulsifying properties have also been considered. Similar<br />

studies have been made by other teams. Neves et al. 49 studied<br />

the impact of enzyme source and hydrolysis conditions on the<br />

molecular weight distribution of a hydrolysate of brackish water<br />

minced fish and minced shrimps. Sumaya-Martinez 50 fractionated<br />

a shrimp frame hydrolysate by successive microfiltration (0.45 µm)<br />

and ultrafiltration (30 kDa, 5 kDa). Unfortunately, only few details<br />

are given in these works concerning the operating conditions<br />

of the fractionation process, except the molecular weight<br />

cut-off (MWCO) of the membranes used. For instance, the<br />

volume reduction factor (VRF) is rarely defined, so the peptidic<br />

population whose activity is tested is not precisely known.<br />

It is recognized, however, that short peptides, below 3 or<br />

4 kDa, usually harbour bioactive properties and the peptide<br />

size is a physicochemical parameter – although not a unique<br />

one – controlling peptide activities. Some studies, however,<br />

discuss the impact of ultrafiltration on peptidic populations on<br />

the basis of size exclusion chromatograms. 51–54 The present study<br />

was designed to discover whether UF and nanofiltration (NF) of a<br />

bioactive FPH, performed under controlled conditions, represent<br />

innovative industrial processes for obtaining fractions defined by<br />

a strict range of peptide size and enriched in bioactive peptides.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Fish protein hydrolysate<br />

The FPH selected for this study was Prolastin, a commercial<br />

product from the French company Copalis. Prolastin is an<br />

elastin hydrolysate obtained by controlled proteolysis of skins<br />

from North Atlantic lean fish (Gadidae: mostly cod and pollack),<br />

followed by purification steps based on sieving, centrifugation<br />

and discoloration. Proteolysis was performed at Copalis, using<br />

an industrial bacterial endopeptidase under optimized conditions<br />

of time, pH and enzyme/substrate ratio. Prolastin is composed<br />

of polypeptides with a low molecular weight (1000–5000 Da),<br />

which makes it soluble and very digestible. Its NaCl content is very<br />

low (0.79%, w/w), which allows a relevant study of the biological<br />

activity of the starting hydrolysate and related fractions. It is sold<br />

as a functional ingredient for dietary complements, helping to<br />

give elasticity to tissues and limit their ageing. It is produced on<br />

an industrial scale and the reproducibility of the process and final<br />

product were confirmed before fractionation.<br />

Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration of FPH<br />

Prolastin was fractionated successively by UF and NF, the UF<br />

permeate being used as the feed solution for the NF step (Fig. 1).<br />

Experiments were carried out on a Microlab40 pilot plant (VMA<br />

Industrie, Versailles, France) with a maximum capacity of 5 L<br />

(launching tank 4.3 L + dead volume 0.7 L). The pilot plant was<br />

equipped with tubular organic membranes (PCI Ltd, Singapore),<br />

diameter 12 mm, surface area 0.033 m 2 : an NF membrane in<br />

polyamide/polyethersulfone (60% retention in CaCl2, ref. AFC40)<br />

and a UF membrane in modified polyethersulfone (MWCO 4 kDa,<br />

ref. ESP04). The ESP04 UF membrane was chosen from the PCI<br />

range according to the molecular weight distribution of the<br />

hydrolysate. It was recently shown that a nominal MWCO between<br />

the molecular weight of the largest and medium-sized peptides is a<br />

good choice for the fractionation of a hydrolysate. 55 The AFC40 NF<br />

membrane was selected as it has the poorest salt retention in the<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1819–1826


Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration of industrial fish protein hydrolysate www.soci.org<br />

Figure 1. The ultrafiltration–nanofiltration sequence.<br />

PCI range, which makes it the most appropriate to fractionate the<br />

UF permeate. An MWCO of about 300 Da has been estimated by<br />

the membrane supplier for the fractionation of organic molecules<br />

onto this NF membrane.<br />

A 10 L volume of solution was prepared by mixing 100 g<br />

of hydrolysate powder in warm pure water. A 1 L aliquot was<br />

reserved for analysis. Thus 9 L of the initial solution was filtered<br />

using the 4 kDa membrane. At the end of the concentration<br />

process, volumes of about 8 L permeate and 1 L retentate were<br />

recovered. All retentate was kept for analysis, as well as a<br />

sample of about 1 L permeate. The remaining permeate (7 L)<br />

constituted the initial solution filtered by NF in the second<br />

step of the fractionation cascade. Six litres of permeate and<br />

1 L retentate were obtained and kept for analysis. At the end<br />

of each filtration step a sample of 10–50 mL ‘instantaneous’<br />

permeate was reserved in order to estimate the retention factor<br />

at the end of this operation. Filtrations were carried out under the<br />

following operating conditions: tangential velocity V = 2.5ms −1 ,<br />

temperature T = 55 ◦ C, transmembrane pressure �P = 30 bar for<br />

UF or 35 bar for NF. The selected values for V and �P were the<br />

maximum allowed by the pilot and the membrane, in order to<br />

minimize filtration time. However, filtration times were also quite<br />

long due to the high-reduction volume factors that were reached.<br />

Thus a fairly high temperature was chosen in order to maximize<br />

permeation fluxes, as well as to limit bacterial growth.<br />

Previously unused UF and NF membranes were conditioned<br />

before use according to the following sequence of washing:<br />

water – Ultrasil 11 – water – nitric acid – water. Recovery rate in<br />

peptides in UF or NF fractions were computed as the nitrogen<br />

content of the fraction considered (retentate or permeate) divided<br />

by the sum of nitrogen content in retentate and permeate.<br />

Nitrogen content of samples was determined by the Kjeldahl<br />

method following the norm NF EN 25 663 ISO 5663 (1994).<br />

Physical and biochemical characterization of FPH, UF and NF<br />

fractions<br />

Colour, dry matter, pH, NaCl content, protein content and<br />

protein recovery rates were measured or calculated following<br />

normalized procedures. NaCl contents were determined using<br />

a coulometric method (chlorimeter 926, Corning, Halstead, UK).<br />

Protein contents were calculated as 6.25 times the total Kjeldahl<br />

nitrogen amount. Aminogram of Prolastin was determined using<br />

10 mg of freeze-dried sample hydrolysed for 24 h at 110 ◦ Cin<br />

200 µL of6molL −1 HCl in vacuum-sealed vials. The hydrolysed<br />

sample was dried under N2, diluted with 2.5 mL deionized water,<br />

and amino acid composition was determined using the EZ : faast <br />

procedure (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), consisting of a solidphase<br />

extraction step followed by derivatization and liquid–liquid<br />

extraction. The organic phase containing derivatized amino acids<br />

was analysed by gas chromatography–flame ionization detection<br />

(PerkinElmer Autosystem XL, Waltham, MA, USA). Amino acids<br />

were identified according to their retention time and quantified<br />

using a calibration curve and an internal standard (norvaline<br />

200 µmol L −1 added to each sample). The molecular weight<br />

(MW) distributions of the native hydrolysate and UF/NF fractions<br />

were analysed by size exclusion chromatography in fast protein<br />

liquid chromatography mode using a Superdex Peptide® HR<br />

10/300 column (Amersham, Little Chalfont, UK; fractionation<br />

range: 7000–100 Da) according to Guérard. 25 Samples were<br />

diluted so that the mass injected was the same for each sample.<br />

The resulting normalized chromatograms obtained in this way<br />

are representative of the peptide distribution, both in terms<br />

of MW and mass composition, and are more expressive than<br />

raw chromatograms to analyse the impact of a membrane<br />

fractionation. Total areas of the chromatograms were integrated<br />

and separated into five MW ranges expressed as the percentage of<br />

the total surface (>7000, 7000–3000, 3000–1000, 1000–300 and<br />


1822<br />

Table 1. Physical properties of the PROLASTIN hydrolysate and its UF and NF fractions<br />

www.soci.org L Picot et al.<br />

Colour Dry matter (DM) g L −1 pH NaCl/DM (%) Protein/DM (%) Protein recovery rate % a<br />

Unfractionated hydrolysate Yellow-orange 111.50 8 0.79 88.5<br />

Retentate UF 4 kDa Yellow-orange 355.25 7.9 0.06 90.9 31<br />

Permeate UF 4 kDa Yellow 85 7.9 1.06 81.6 69<br />

Retentate NF 300 Da Yellow 325 7.9 0.09 91.3 77<br />

Permeate NF 300 Da Yellow 25.55 8.1 3.60 71.1 23<br />

a Protein recovery rate was determined with reference to the unfractionated hydrolysate for ultrafiltration to the UF permeate for NF fractions.<br />

rats according to the method of Neville 56 until step 11. Proteins<br />

were quantified by the method of Folin–Lowry using bovine<br />

serum albumin (BSA) as standard. 57 Incubations, in a 400 µL<br />

final volume, were performed at 22 ◦ C for 1h. 58 At the end<br />

of the incubation, bound and free ligands were separated by<br />

centrifugation in a solution containing 2% BSA. Each batch was<br />

tested at four increasing protein concentrations, and only the<br />

straight lines presenting slopes similar to that obtained with<br />

the standard hormone (0.01–1 ng per assay) were considered as<br />

positive. The receptor binding ability of each purified fraction was<br />

determined in triplicate independent assays and used to calculate<br />

the quantity (pg) of CGRP-like activity per milligram of protein.<br />

Data were also expressed as the amount of protein (mg) that<br />

induced a 50% inhibition of the initial CGRP binding to rat liver<br />

membranes (ED50).<br />

Antioxidant activity<br />

DPPH radical scavenging activity<br />

Radical scavenging activity was measured according to the<br />

procedure reported by Morales and Jiménez-Pérez. 59 An aliquot<br />

of sample (200 µL) was added to 1 mL of a daily-prepared solution<br />

of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH ·) at a concentration of<br />

74 mg L −1 in ethanol. The mixture was shaken for 1 h at 25 ◦ C. The<br />

sample was centrifuged at 10 000 × g for 5 min and absorption of<br />

the supernatant was measured at 520 nm. DPPH · concentration<br />

in the reaction medium was calculated from the calibration curve,<br />

determined by linear regression:<br />

[DPPH]t = 0.0241(A520 nm) + 0.022(r 2 = 0.9995)<br />

The radical scavenging activity of the sample was expressed as<br />

percentage disappearance of DPPH ·:<br />

DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) =<br />

(1 − ([DPPH]t/[DPPH]H2O) × 100)<br />

where [DPPH]H2O is the concentration of DPPH in the presence<br />

of water instead of hydrolysate. In vitro DPPH radical scavenging<br />

activity was determined in triplicate independent assays and<br />

expressed as AC50, corresponding to the concentration of<br />

hydrolysate (mg mL −1 protein determined according to the<br />

Kjeldahl method) able to scavenge 50% of DPPH radical.<br />

Quantification of antioxidant activity using the β-carotene/linoleate<br />

model system<br />

Antioxidant activity was determined using the β-carotene–<br />

linoleate model system as described by Marco 60 with some slight<br />

modifications. Five-millilitre aliquots of a β-carotene–linoleate<br />

emulsion were transferred to glass tubes, containing 200 µL<br />

of sample at several protein concentrations in MilliQ water.<br />

All samples were stirred and incubated simultaneously for<br />

2h at 50 ◦ C. Absorbance values at 470 nm of samples and<br />

controls (water and butylhydroxyanisol (BHA)) were recorded<br />

every 30 min with a microplate reader (SpectraMax Plus 384,<br />

Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The antioxidant activity<br />

gives an estimate of the relative protection of each sample against<br />

the oxidation of linoleate, observed by the bleaching extent of<br />

the β-carotene–linoleate emulsion. The antioxidant activity was<br />

calculated as follows:<br />

Antioxidant activity = (ODt=60 min/ODt=0 min) × 100<br />

In vitro antioxidant activity was determined in triplicate independent<br />

assays and expressed as AC50, corresponding to the<br />

concentration of hydrolysate (mg mL −1 protein determined according<br />

to the Kjeldahl method) inducing 50% antioxidant activity.<br />

ACE-1 inhibition assay<br />

In vitro inhibition of ACE-1 was assayed following the spectrophotometric<br />

Holmquist method. 61 Inhibition was calculated from<br />

triplicate independent assays and expressed as IC50 and maximal<br />

percentage inhibition. IC50 corresponds to the concentration of<br />

hydrolysate or fraction inducing 50% inhibition of ACE-1 activity.<br />

Captopril 21.7 × 10 −3 µgmL −1 (0.1 µmol L −1 ) was used as a<br />

reference inducing 100% inhibition.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Physical, chemical and biochemical properties of FPH<br />

and fractions<br />

Colour, dry matter, pH, NaCl content, protein content, protein<br />

recovery rates and aminograms of Prolastin and related UF and NF<br />

fractions are given in Tables 1 and 2. Aminograms of Prolastin and<br />

related fractions revealed a balanced composition and confirmed<br />

their high nutritional value (Table 2). It is of interest to note that<br />

peptides containing Pro, Hyp, Asp and Glu were concentrated<br />

in the UF and NF retentates compared to the unfractionated hydrolysate<br />

and UF permeate respectively (Table 2), suggesting that<br />

the presence of specific amino acids may influence the interactions<br />

of peptides with the peptide layer in contact with the membranes.<br />

Peptidic profiles and impact of fractionation on MW<br />

distribution<br />

Prolastin is a highly hydrolysed peptide mix, in which 98.6%<br />

(by mass) of peptides have a molecular weight lower than 4000<br />

Da (Table 3). Ultrafiltration of the crude hydrolysate, as well as<br />

nanofiltration of the ultrafiltrated permeate, constituted very<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1819–1826


Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration of industrial fish protein hydrolysate www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Amino acid composition of unfractionated Prolastin and related UF and NF fractions<br />

Aminoacid(mmolg −1 dry sample)<br />

Ala Gly Val Leu Ile Thr Ser Pro Asp Met Hyp Glu Phe Lys His Hly Tyr<br />

Unfractionated hydrolysate 0.71 1.83 0.25 0.35 0.18 0.29 0.46 0.56 0.40 0.13 0.22 0.43 0.14 0.12 0.05 0.00 0.04<br />

Retentate UF 4 kDa 0.65 2.16 0.26 0.27 0.20 0.30 0.47 0.78 0.64 0.11 0.40 0.64 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.02 0.04<br />

Permeate UF 4 kDa 0.72 1.62 0.29 0.37 0.22 0.29 0.44 0.49 0.43 0.12 0.20 0.56 0.13 0.15 0.06 0.01 0.05<br />

Retentate NF 300 Da 0.70 1.85 0.31 0.33 0.23 0.31 0.44 0.62 0.52 0.12 0.27 0.68 0.13 0.16 0.07 0.01 0.04<br />

Permeate NF 300 Da 0.88 1.25 0.28 0.51 0.19 0.27 0.47 0.27 0.21 0.11 0.04 0.25 0.16 0.13 0.06 0.01 0.05<br />

Ala, alanine; Gly, glycine; Val, valine; Leu, leucine; Ile, isoleucine; Thr, threonine; Ser, serine; Pro, proline; Asp, aspartic acid; Met, methionine; Hyp,<br />

hydroxyproline; Glu, glutamic acid; Phe, phenylalanine; Lys, lysine; His, histidine; Hly, hydroxylysine; Tyr, tyrosine.<br />

Table 3. Molecular weight distribution of peptides contained in Prolastin and related UF and NF fractions (% repartition)<br />

Molecular weight Da) >7000 7000–4000 4000–1000 1000–300 4000 Da for the<br />

UF retentate, 300–4000 Da for the NF retentate, etc.).<br />

Presence of gastrin/CCK-like peptides in FPH and fractions<br />

Dosage of gastrin/CCK-like peptides in the fractions is presented<br />

in Table 4. Gastrin/CCK-like peptides were identified in the unfractionated<br />

hydrolysate and in all UF and NF fractions. The curve<br />

Flux (L h -1 m -2 )<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

UF<br />

NF<br />

20<br />

Time (min)<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200<br />

Figure 2. Flux evolution with time for UF and NF steps, Prolastin<br />

hydrolysate (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2009.<br />

Elsevier).<br />

slope measured with the unfractionated hydrolysate was very<br />

close to that of standard 125 I-gastrin, indicating the presence of<br />

peptides binding specifically to gastrin antibodies. The amount<br />

of gastrin/CCK-like peptides present in the unfractionated hydrolysate<br />

was in the range of data previously published for fish and<br />

shellfish hydrolysates, 36 the best activity (about 4 pg of gastrin-like<br />

peptides) being obtained with a shrimp hydrolysate fraction containing<br />

peptides between 4000 and 1000 Da. The ED50 value of the<br />

unfractionated hydrolysate was very high, which is characteristic of<br />

alowbindingaffinity.UFandNFofProlastinresultedinvariationsin<br />

the curve slope and dilution of gastrin/CCK-like peptides, suggesting<br />

that these processes do not allow an enrichment of peptides<br />

of interest. Interestingly, the ED50 measured for UF and NF retentates<br />

was much lower than that of the unfractionated hydrolysate,<br />

suggesting that the gastrin antibody binding affinity of peptides<br />

present in these fractions was increased. However, the main conclusion<br />

of this dosage is that UF or NF fractionations do not allow<br />

concentration of gastrin/CCK-like peptides in selected fractions.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1819–1826 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1823


1824<br />

Table 4. Secretagogue activities (gastrin/CCK-like peptides) in Prolastin<br />

hydrolysate and related UF and NF fractions<br />

Fraction Slope<br />

Gastrin/CCK-like<br />

peptides<br />

(pg mg −1 dry<br />

weight)<br />

www.soci.org L Picot et al.<br />

ED50<br />

(mg dry<br />

weight)<br />

125 I-gastrin-17 −41.99 – –<br />

Unfractionated hydrolysate −38.87 1.30 11.03<br />

Retentate UF 4 kDa −58.86 0.98 5.97<br />

Permeate UF 4 kDa −48.83 0.93 9.03<br />

Retentate NF 300 Da −64.61 0.76 5.99<br />

Permeate NF 300 Da ND ND ND<br />

ND, not determined.<br />

Table 5. CGRP-like peptides in the Prolastin hydrolysate and related<br />

UF and NF fractions<br />

Fraction<br />

CGRP-like peptides<br />

(pg mg −1 dry weight)<br />

ED50<br />

(mg dry weight)<br />

Unfractionated hydrolysate 4 19<br />

Retentate UF 4 kDa ND ND<br />

Permeate UF 4 kDa 42 3.6<br />

Retentate NF 300 Da 21.5 6.1<br />

Permeate NF 300 Da 26.6 6.9<br />

ND, not detectable, as the slope was very different from the CGRP<br />

standard slope.<br />

Presence of CGRP-like peptides in FPH and fractions<br />

The dosage of CGRP-like peptides in fractions demonstrated an<br />

important increase (tenfold) of CGRP-like activities in the UF<br />

permeate, relative to the crude extract (Table 5). NF of the UF<br />

permeate did not allow a higher concentration of CGRP-like<br />

peptides. The highest activity found in the UF permeate was<br />

also confirmed by the ED50 values (Table 5). The best interaction<br />

was observed with the UF permeate, with only 3.6 mg dry weight<br />

of sample necessary to obtain 50% inhibition of the maximal<br />

binding of radiolabelled CGRP; this value corresponded to a 5.2fold<br />

affinity increase compared to the unfractionated hydrolysate.<br />

Moreover, this ED50 value could not be increased by a subsequent<br />

NF process. Therefore it appears that UF allows concentration<br />

of CGRP-like peptides in the UF permeate, with an important<br />

increase of affinity for CGRP receptors, as measured using the<br />

binding displacement of 125 I-CGRP.<br />

Antioxidant activities<br />

The in vitro antioxidant activities of Prolastin hydrolysate and<br />

fractions are presented in Table 6. Before fractionation, Prolastin<br />

showed a high DPPH radical scavenging activity, with an AC50<br />

of 24.7 mg mL −1 . This result suggests that Prolastin contains<br />

peptides reacting with free radicals to form more stable products.<br />

Prolastin also showed a potent antioxidant activity, with an AC50<br />

of 0.12 g L −1 . Fractionation of Prolastin induced a weak loss of<br />

antioxidant and DPPH radical scavenging activities. According to<br />

Pihlanto, 62 the structure–activity relationship of the antioxidant<br />

mechanism of protein hydrolysates is not yet fully understood.<br />

The antioxidant activity seems to be inherent to the characteristic<br />

amino acid sequences of the peptides, depending both on the<br />

Table 6. Radical scavenging and antioxidant activities of Prolastin<br />

hydrolysate and related UF and NF fractions<br />

Fraction<br />

Radical scavenging<br />

activity (DPPH · test)<br />

AC50 (mg mL −1 )<br />

Antioxidant activity<br />

(β-carotene test)<br />

AC50 (mg mL −1 )<br />

Unfractionated hydrolysate 24.7 0.12<br />

Retentate UF 4 kDa 39.3 0.24<br />

Permeate UF 4 kDa 40 0.36<br />

Retentate NF 300 Da 32.7 0.24<br />

Permeate NF 300 Da ND


Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration of industrial fish protein hydrolysate www.soci.org<br />

ACE inhibitory activity is mostly dependent on peptide size rather<br />

than on fish species source. Ultrafiltration of Prolastin did not<br />

result in drastic changes in ACE inhibitory activity, contrary to<br />

previous observations obtained on Pacific hake peptides. Several<br />

hypotheses can be drawn to explain why UF had only a weak<br />

impact on ACE inhibitory activities. The presence of a large amount<br />

of peptides of


1826<br />

20 Fujii M, Matsumura N, Mito K, Shimizu T, Kuwahara M, Sugano S, et al,<br />

Antihypertensive effects of peptides in autolysate of bonito bowels<br />

on spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem<br />

57:2186–2188 (1993).<br />

21 Karaki H, Kuwahara M, Sugano S, Doi C, Doi K, Matsumura N, et al,<br />

Oral administration of peptides derived from bonito bowels<br />

decreases blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats by<br />

inhibiting angiotensin converting enzyme. Comp Biochem Physiol C<br />

104:351–353 (1993).<br />

22 Fujita , Yokoyama K, Yasumoto R and Yoshikawa M, Antihypertensive<br />

effect of thermolysin digest of dried bonito in spontaneously<br />

hypertensive rat. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl 22:S304–305<br />

(1995).<br />

23 Kawasaki T, Seki E, Osajima K, Yoshida M, Asada K, Matsui T, et al,<br />

Antihypertensive effect of valyl-tyrosine, a short chain peptide<br />

derived from sardine muscle hydrolyzate, on mild hypertensive<br />

subjects. J Hum Hypertens 14:519–523 (2000).<br />

24 Diplock AT, Charleux JL, Crozier-Willi G, Kok FG, Rice-Evans C,<br />

Roberfroid M, et al, Functional food science and defence against<br />

reactive oxidative species: functional food science in Europe. Br J<br />

Nutr 80:77–112 (1998).<br />

25 Guérard F, Sumaya-Martinez MT, Laroque D, Chabeaud A and<br />

Dufossé L, Optimization of free radical scavenging activity in<br />

the hydrolysis of shrimp processing discards by response surface<br />

methodology. Process Biochem 42:1486–1491 (2007).<br />

26 Kim Y, Je JY and Kim SK, Purification and characterization of<br />

antioxidant peptide from hoki (Johnius belengerii) frameprotein<br />

by gastrointestinal digestion. JNutrBiochem18:31–38 (2007).<br />

27 Je JY, Qian ZJ, Byun HG and Kim SK, Purification and characterization<br />

of an antioxidant peptide obtained from tuna backbone protein by<br />

enzymatic hydrolysis. Process Biochem 42:840–846 (2007).<br />

28 Mendis E, Rajapakse N, Byun HG and Kim SK, Investigation of jumbo<br />

squid (Dosidicus gigas) skin gelatin peptides for their in vitro<br />

antioxidant effects. Life Sci 77:2166–2178 (2005).<br />

29 Mendis E, Rajapakse N and Kim SK, Antioxidant properties of a radicalscavenging<br />

peptide purified from enzymatically prepared fish skin<br />

gelatin hydrolysate. J Agric Food Chem 53:581–587 (2005).<br />

30 Ranathunga S, Rajapakse N and Kim SK, Purification and<br />

characterization of antioxidative peptide derived from muscle of<br />

conger eel (Conger myriaster). Eur Food Res Technol 222:310–315<br />

(2006).<br />

31 Klompong V, Benjakul S, Kantachote D and Shahidi F, Antioxidative<br />

activity and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow<br />

stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as influenced by the degree of<br />

hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food Chem 102:1317–1327 (2007).<br />

32 Suetsuna K, Antioxidant peptides from the protease digest of prawn<br />

(Penaeus japonicus)muscle.Marine Biotechnol 2:5–10 (2000).<br />

33 Thiansilakul Y, Benjakul S and Shahidi F, Antioxidative activity of<br />

protein hydrolysate from round scad muscle using alcalase and<br />

flavourzyme. J Food Biochem 31:266–287 (2007).<br />

34 Cancre I, Ravallec R, Van Wormhoudt A, Stenberg E, Gildberg A and<br />

le Gal Y, Secretagogues and growth factors in fish and crustacean<br />

protein hydrolysates. Marine Biotechnol 1:489–494 (1999).<br />

35 Ravallec-Plé R, Charlot C, Pires C, Batista I, Van Wormhoudt A, Le Gal Y,<br />

et al, The presence of bioactive peptides in hydrolysates prepared<br />

from processing wastes of sardine (Sardina pilchardus). J Sci Food<br />

Agric 81:1120–1125 (2001).<br />

36 Ravallec-Plé R and Van Wormhoudt A, Secretagogues activities in cod<br />

(Gadus morhua)andshrimp(Penaeus aztecus) extracts and alcalase<br />

hydrolysates determined in AR4-2J pancreatic tumour cells. Comp<br />

Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 134:669–679 (2003).<br />

37 Johnson LRE, Copeland EM and Dudrick SJ, Luminal gastrin stimulates<br />

growth of the distal intestine. Scand J Gastroenterol 13:95 (1978).<br />

38 Amara SG, Jonas V, Rosenfeld MG, Ong ES and Evans RM, Alternative<br />

RNA processing in calcitonin gene expression generates mRNAs<br />

encoding different polypeptide products. Nature 298:240–244<br />

(1982).<br />

39 Brain SD and Grant AD, Vascular actions of calcitonin gene-related<br />

peptide and adrenomedullin. Physiol Rev 84:903–934 (2004).<br />

40 Beinfeld MC, Cholecystokinin/gastrin, in Psychopharmacology: The<br />

Fourth Generation of Progress, ed. by Bloom FE and Kupfer D. Raven<br />

Press, New York, pp. 585–594 (1995).<br />

41 Bray GA, Afferent signals regulating food intake. Proc Nutr Soc<br />

59:373–384 (2000).<br />

42 Thavanathan R and Volkoff H, Effects of amylin on feeding of goldfish:<br />

interactions with CCK. Regul Peptides 133:90–96 (2006).<br />

www.soci.org L Picot et al.<br />

43 LenzHJ,MortrudMT,ValeWW,RivierJEandBrownMR,Calcitonin<br />

gene related peptide acts within the central nervous system to<br />

inhibit gastric acid secretion. Regul Peptides 9:271–277 (1984).<br />

44 Fouchereau-Peron M, Duvail L, Michel C, Gildberg A, Batista I and Le<br />

Gal Y, Isolation of an acid fraction from a fish protein hydrolysate<br />

with a CGRP-like biological activity. Biotechnol Appl Biochem<br />

29:87–92 (1999).<br />

45 Martinez Alvarez O, Delannoy C, Guimas L and Fouchereau-Peron M,<br />

TheoccurrenceofCGRPlikemoleculeinasiki(Centroscymnus<br />

coelolepsis) hydrolysate of industrial origin. J Agric Food Chem<br />

55:5469–5475 (2007).<br />

46 Jeon YJ, Byun HG and Kim SK, Improvement of functional properties<br />

of cod frame protein hydrolysates using ultrafiltration membranes.<br />

Process Biochem 35:471–478 (1999).<br />

47 Je JY, Park PJ and Kim SK, Antioxidant activity of a peptide isolated<br />

from Alaska pollack (Theragra chalcogramma) frame protein<br />

hydrolysate. Food Res Int 38:45–50 (2005).<br />

48 Rajapakse N, Purification and in vitro antioxidative effects of giant<br />

squid muscle peptides on free radical-mediated oxidative systems.<br />

JNutrBiochem16:562–569 (2005).<br />

49 Neves RAM, Mira NVM and Marquez UML, Characterization of<br />

enzymatic fish hydrolysates. Cienc Tecnol Aliment 24:101–108<br />

(2004).<br />

50 Sumaya-Martinez MT, Valorisation d’hydrolysats de co-produits de<br />

crevettes : étude de l’activité antiradicalaire et antioxydante,<br />

fractionnement des substances actives et effet de la glycation. (Upgrading<br />

shrimps by-products hydrolysates : study of the antiradical<br />

and antioxidant activity, fractionation of active molecules and effect<br />

of glycation). Doctoral thesis, Université deBretagneOccidentale,<br />

France (in French) (2004).<br />

51 Vandanjon L, Johannsson R, Derouiniot M, Jaouen P and Bourseau P,<br />

Concentration and purification by ultrafiltration of marine peptides<br />

solutions. J Food Eng 83:581–589 (2007).<br />

52 Chabeaud A, Vandanjon L, Bourseau P, Jaouen P and Guérard F,<br />

Fractionation by ultrafiltration of a saithe protein hydrolysate<br />

(Pollachius virens): effect of material and molecular weight cut-off<br />

onthemembraneperformances.J Food Eng 91:408–414 (2009).<br />

53 Chabeaud A, Vandanjon L, Bourseau P, Jaouen P, Chaplain-<br />

Derouiniot M and Guérard F, Performances of ultrafiltration<br />

membranes for fractionating a fish protein hydrolysate: application<br />

to the refining of bioactive peptidic fractions. Sep Purif Technol<br />

66:463–471 (2009).<br />

54 Vandanjon L, Grignon M, Courois E, Bourseau P and Jaouen P,<br />

Fractionating of fish hydrolysates by a cascade of ultrafiltration<br />

and nanofiltration. J Food Eng 95:36–44 (2009).<br />

55 Bourseau P, Vandanjon L, Jaouen P, Chaplain-Derouiniot M, MasséA,<br />

Guérard F, et al, Fractionation of fish protein hydrolysates by<br />

ultrafiltration and nanofiltration: impact on peptidic populations.<br />

Desalination 244:303–320 (2009).<br />

56 Neville DMJ, Isolation of an organ specific protein antigen from cell<br />

surface membrane rat liver. Biochim Biophys Acta 154:540–552<br />

(1968).<br />

57 Lowry OM, Rosenbrough WJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ, Protein<br />

measurement with folin phenol reagent. JBiolChem193:265–275<br />

(1951).<br />

58 Yamaguchi A, Chiba T, Yamatani T, Inui T, Morishita T, Nakamura A,<br />

et al, Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulates adenylate cyclase<br />

activation via guanine nucleotide-dependent process in rat liver<br />

plasma membranes. Endocrinology 123:2591–2597 (1988).<br />

59 Morales FJ and Jiménez-Pérez S, Free radical scavenging capacity of<br />

Maillard reaction products as related to colour and fluorescence.<br />

Food Chem 72:119–125 (2001).<br />

60 Marco GJ, A rapid method for evaluation of antioxidants. JAmOil<br />

Chem Soc 45:594–598 (1968).<br />

61 Holmquist B, Bunning P and Riordan J, A continuous spectrophotometric<br />

assay for angiotensin converting enzyme. J Anal Chem<br />

95:540–548 (1979).<br />

62 Pihlanto A, Antioxidative peptides derived from milk proteins. Int Dairy<br />

J 16:1306–314 (2006).<br />

63 Cinq-Mars CD and Li-Chan EC, Optimizing angiotensin I-converting<br />

enzyme inhibitory activity of Pacific hake (Merluccius productus)<br />

fillet hydrolysate using response surface methodology and<br />

ultrafiltration. J Agric Food Chem 55:9380–9388 (2007).<br />

64 Kitts DD and Weiler K, Bioactive proteins and peptides from food<br />

sources: applications of bioprocesses used in isolation and recovery.<br />

Curr Pharm Des 9:1309–1323 (2003).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1819–1826


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 7 September 2009 Revised: 31 March 2010 Accepted: 26 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 10 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4021<br />

Seasonal variation in content, chemical<br />

composition and antimicrobial and cytotoxic<br />

activities of essential oils from four Mentha<br />

species<br />

Abdullah I Hussain, a,b Farooq Anwar, b∗ Poonam S Nigam, c<br />

Muhammad Ashraf d,e and Anwarul H Gilani f<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to appraise variation in the chemical composition, and antimicrobial<br />

and cytotoxic activities of essential oils from the leaves of four Mentha species – M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and<br />

M. spicata – as affected by harvesting season. Disc diffusion and broth microdilution susceptibility assays were used to evaluate<br />

the antimicrobial activity of Mentha essential oils against a panel of microorganisms. The cytotoxicity of essential oils was<br />

tested on breast cancer (MCF-7) and prostate cancer (LNCaP) cell lines using the MTT assay.<br />

RESULTS: The essential oil contents of M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and M. spicata were 17.0, 12.2, 10.8 and 12.0 g kg −1<br />

from the summer and 9.20, 10.5, 7.00 and 9.50 g kg −1 from the winter crops, respectively. Gas chromatographic–mass<br />

spectrometric analysis revealed that mostly quantitative rather than qualitative variation was observed in the oil composition<br />

of each species. The principal chemical constituents determined in M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and M. spicata essential<br />

oils from both seasons were menthol, menthone, piperitenone oxide and carvone, respectively. The tested essential oils and<br />

their major components exhibited notable antimicrobial activity against most of the plant and human pathogens tested. The<br />

tested essential oils also exhibited good cytotoxicity potential.<br />

CONCLUSION: Of the Mentha essential oils tested, M. arvensis essential oil showed relatively better antimicrobial and cytotoxic<br />

activities. A significant variation in the content of most of the chemical components and biological activities of seasonally<br />

collected samples was documented.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: Mentha arvensis; Mentha piperita; Mentha longifolia; Mentha spicata; antimicrobial; antioxidant; menthol; carvone<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The genus Mentha (family Lamiaceae), comprising more than<br />

25 species, grows widely throughout the temperate regions<br />

of the world. 1 Mentha arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and<br />

M. spicata, commonly known as menthol mint, peppermint, wild<br />

mint and spearmint, respectively, are frequently cultivated in<br />

many countries of East Asia, Europe, America and Australia for<br />

the production of essential oils. 1,2 The essential oils and extracts<br />

from Mentha species have been in use since ancient times for the<br />

treatment of many digestive tract diseases and in cuisines. 3<br />

The essential oils of some Mentha species, including M. arvensis,<br />

M. piperita, M. longifolia and M. spicata, are potential candidates<br />

for exhibiting antimicrobial, antioxidant, radical-scavenging and<br />

cytotoxic activities. 1,2,4,5 Such multiple biological activities of<br />

Mentha essential oils might be ascribed to the presence of<br />

some chemical components, such as menthone, piperitone oxide,<br />

camphor and linalool. 6–8<br />

The chemical composition of plants is known to be influenced<br />

by several external factors including climate, as some compounds<br />

may be accumulated at a particular period to respond to<br />

environmental changes. 9 The chemical composition of the<br />

essential oils from plants is thus subject to quantitative and<br />

qualitative variations. Biological activity which is dependent on<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Farooq Anwar, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,<br />

University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.<br />

E-mail: fqanwar@yahoo.com<br />

a Department of Chemistry, GC University, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan<br />

b Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Agriculture,<br />

Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan<br />

c Centre of Molecular Biosciences, Institute of Biomedical Sciences <strong>Research</strong>,<br />

University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK<br />

d Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan<br />

e King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia<br />

f Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Aga Khan University Medical<br />

College, Karachi 74800, Pakistan<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1827


1828<br />

the chemical composition is similarly subject to variation. Plant<br />

material collected at different times of the year may contain<br />

different novel compounds with other bioactivities. 10<br />

The effects of seasonal variations on the chemical and biological<br />

characteristics of some essential oils of the family Lamiaceae<br />

have been reported in the literature. 8,11,12 However, no earlier<br />

reports are available on the detailed chemical composition and<br />

biological activities of the essential oils from M. arvensis, M. piperita,<br />

M. longifolia and M. spicata native to the subcontinental region. In<br />

the present study, we investigated for the first time the effects of<br />

two different harvesting seasons on the biosynthesis of essential<br />

oils extracted from the leaves of four Mentha species native<br />

to Pakistan, and subsequently their impact on cytotoxicity and<br />

antimicrobial potentials.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Chemicals<br />

Dimethylsulfoxide, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2,5-diphenylte trazolium<br />

bromide) (MTT), penicillin/streptomycin solution, homologous<br />

series of C9 –C24 n-alkanes and various reference chemicals<br />

used in this study were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St<br />

Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals (analytical grade) used in this<br />

study were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), unless<br />

stated otherwise. All culture media and standard antibiotic discs<br />

were purchased from Oxoid Ltd (Basingstoke, UK).<br />

Plant materials<br />

The leaves of wild M. longifolia (L.) Huds. were assayed from three<br />

wild populations in the periphery of Gilgit Valley of the North-West<br />

Frontier Province of Pakistan (NWFP), whereas the leaf samples<br />

of M. arvensis L., M. piperita L. and M. spicata (L.) Huds. were<br />

collected from cultivated fields of the Horticulture and Botanical<br />

Gardens, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. Samples<br />

were collected twice: during summer (April–May) and winter<br />

(October–November) 2007. The mean values for maximum and<br />

minimum temperature ( ◦ C) for the months of April–May and<br />

October–November 2007 in the Gilgit Valley were 30.5 ± 2.9,<br />

15.5 ± 2.2 (average 23.0); 28.1 ± 3.3, 8.9 ± 1.6 (average 18.5),<br />

respectively, whereas those in the University of Agriculture,<br />

Faisalabad region were 40.0 ± 4.2, 24.0 ± 3.7 (average 32.0);<br />

30.8 ± 6.1, 17.2 ± 3.8 (average 24.0), respectively. The average<br />

relative humidity and total rainfall in the months of April–May and<br />

October–November 2007 in the Gilgit Valley were 26.5 ± 10.0%<br />

and 14.3 mm; 46.2 ± 11.3% and 8.2 mm, respectively and those in<br />

the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad region were 23.5 ± 8.3%<br />

and 16.6 mm; 48.0 ± 15.2% and 10.2 mm, respectively. Three<br />

different samples for each species during each of the harvesting<br />

season were assayed. The plant specimens were identified<br />

and authenticated by Dr Mansoor Hameed, taxonomist of the<br />

Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad,<br />

Pakistan. Further authentication was made by comparison with<br />

authentic vouchers of M. arvensis (No. 1003), M. piperita (No. 2212),<br />

M. longifolia (No. 8095) and M. spicata (No. 9058) deposited in<br />

the Herbarium of the Botany Department of the University of<br />

Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. The leaf samples were dried at<br />

30 ◦ C in a hot air-oven (IM-30 m, IRMECO, Geesthacht, Germany)<br />

to constant weight.<br />

Extraction of essential oils<br />

The dried leaves of M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and<br />

M. spicata were ground prior to the operation and then 100 g<br />

www.soci.org AI Hussain et al.<br />

of samples were subjected to hydro-distillation for 3 h using a<br />

Clevenger-type apparatus. 8 The distilled essential oils were dried<br />

over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and stored at −4 ◦ Cuntil<br />

analysis. The yields (g kg −1 ) of the oils were calculated on a<br />

moisture-free basis.<br />

Chemical composition of essential oils<br />

Gas chromatography (GC)<br />

The essential oils were analysed using a gas chromatograph<br />

(model 8700, PerkinElmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) equipped with<br />

flame ionization detector (FID) and HP-5 MS capillary column<br />

(30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 µm). Injector and detector<br />

temperatures were set at 220 and 290 ◦ C, respectively. Column<br />

oven temperature was programmed from 80 to 220 ◦ Catarate<br />

of 4 ◦ Cmin −1 ; initial and final temperatures were held for 3 and<br />

10 min, respectively. Helium was used as a carrier gas with a flow<br />

rate of 1.5 mL min −1 .Asampleof1.0 µL was injected using the<br />

split mode (split ratio 1 : 100). All quantification was done using<br />

a built-in data-handling program provided by the manufacturer<br />

of the gas chromatograph (PerkinElmer). The composition was<br />

reported as relative percentage of the total peak area.<br />

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)<br />

GC-MS analysis of the essential oils was performed using an<br />

Agilent Technologies (Little Falls, CA, USA) 6890N network GC<br />

system, equipped with an Agilent Technologies 5975 inert XL mass<br />

selective detector and 7683B series auto-injector. Compounds<br />

were separated on an HP-5 MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm,<br />

film thickness 0.25 µm). A 1.0 µL sample was injected in the<br />

split mode, with a split ratio of 1 : 100. For GC-MS detection, an<br />

electron ionization system with ionization energy of 70 eV was<br />

used. Column oven temperature programme was the same as<br />

in GC analysis. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate<br />

of 1.5 mL min −1 . Mass range was 50–550 m/z, while the injector<br />

and MS transfer line temperatures were set at 220 and 290 ◦ C,<br />

respectively.<br />

Compound identification<br />

Identification of components was based on comparison of their<br />

mass spectra with those of the NIST mass spectral library 13,14 and<br />

those described by Adam, 15 as well as on comparison of their<br />

retention indices either with those of authentic compounds or<br />

with literature values. 7,15,16<br />

Antimicrobial activity of essential oils<br />

Mentha essential oils were individually tested against a panel of<br />

microorganisms, including three strains of bacteria: Staphylococcus<br />

aureus ATCC 25923, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 10707 and Escherichia<br />

coli ATCC 25922; and seven strains of pathogenic fungi: Aspergillus<br />

flavus ATCC 32612, Alternaria solani ATCC 11078, Fusarium solani<br />

ATCC 36031, Rhizopus solani, Alternaria alternata ATCC 20084,<br />

Aspergillus niger ATCC 10575 and Rhizopus spp. The pure bacterial<br />

and fungal strains were obtained from the Biological Division of the<br />

Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad,<br />

Pakistan. Purity and identity were verified by the Department<br />

of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad,<br />

Pakistan. Bacterial strains were cultured overnight (16 h) at 37 ◦ C<br />

in nutrient agar (NA, Oxoid), while the fungal strains were cultured<br />

overnight (16 h) at 30 ◦ C using potato dextrose agar (PDA, Oxoid).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836


Biological activities of Mentha essnetial oils www.soci.org<br />

Disc diffusion method<br />

The antimicrobial activity of the Mentha essential oils and the<br />

principal components menthol, menthone, limonene and carvone<br />

were determined by the disc diffusion method. 17 Briefly, 100 µL<br />

of suspension in NA and PDA containing 10 8 colony-forming<br />

units (CFU) mL −1 of bacteria cells and 10 4 spores mL −1 of<br />

fungi were spread on to NA and PDA medium, respectively.<br />

The paper discs (6 mm in diameter) were separately impregnated<br />

with 15 µL of essential oils or main components and placed on<br />

the agar, which had previously been inoculated with the selected<br />

test microorganism. Amoxycillin (30 µg per disc) and fluconazole<br />

(30 µg per disc) were used as a positive reference for bacteria<br />

and fungi, respectively while the discs without samples were used<br />

as a negative control. Plates, after 1 h at 4 ◦ C, were incubated at<br />

37 ◦ C for 24 h for bacteria and at 30 ◦ C for 48 h for fungal strains.<br />

Antimicrobial activity was assessed by measuring the diameter<br />

of the growth inhibition zone (IZ) in millimetres (including disc<br />

diameter of 6 mm) for the test organisms compared to controls.<br />

Micro-dilution broth method<br />

For minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), a micro-dilution<br />

broth susceptibility assay was used, as reported in NCCLS. 18 Microdilution<br />

broth test was performed in nutrient broth (NB, Oxoid) for<br />

bacterial strains and in sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB, Oxoid) for<br />

fungal strains. Essential oils were solubilized in dimethylsulfoxide<br />

(DMSO), then diluted in culture media for use. Dilution series<br />

were prepared from 0.01 to 30.0 mg mL −1 of the essential oils or<br />

their chief components in a 96-well microtitre plate, including one<br />

growth control, solvent control and one sterility control. 160 µL<br />

of nutrient broth and sabouraud dextrose broth for bacteria and<br />

fungi, respectively were added to microplates and 20 µL oftest<br />

solution. Then, 20 µL of5× 10 5 cfu mL −1 (confirmed by viable<br />

count) of standard microorganism suspension were inoculated<br />

onto microplates. The plates were incubated at 37 ◦ Cfor24h<br />

for bacteria, and at 30 ◦ C for 48 h for fungi. Amoxicillin was used<br />

as a reference compound for antibacterial and fluconazole for<br />

antifungal activities. Growth was indicated by the presence of a<br />

white ‘pellet’ on the well bottom. MIC was calculated as the highest<br />

dilution showing complete inhibition of the test strains.<br />

Cytotoxicity of Mentha essential oils<br />

The human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 was maintained in<br />

Dulbecco’s Minimum Essential Medium (DMEM), while hormonedependent<br />

prostate carcinoma LNCaP was cultured in RPMI<br />

1640 medium. Both media were supplemented with 10% heatinactivated<br />

fetal calf serum, 1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin–streptomycin.<br />

Cells of MCF-7 (10 4 per well) and LNCaP<br />

(10 5 per well) were cultivated in 96-well plates for 24 h before the<br />

Mentha essential oils were added. Essential oils were solubilized<br />

in DMSO, then diluted in culture media for use. The essential oil<br />

dilutions (0.01–0.50 mg mL −1 ) were added to triplicate wells and<br />

cells were incubated for a further 24 h. DMSO was tested as solvent<br />

control, while doxorubicin was used as a reference standard. Cell<br />

viability was assessed by MTT assay and the percentage inhibition<br />

of cell viability was calculated using cells treated with DMSO as<br />

control. 19 The IC50 values (concentration at which 50% of cells were<br />

killed) were calculated from inhibition versus concentration graphs.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

All the experiments were conducted in triplicate and the data<br />

are presented as mean values ± standard deviation of triplicate<br />

determinations. Statistical analysis of the data was performed<br />

by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statistica 5.5 (StatSoft Inc.,<br />

Tulsa, OK, USA) software, and a probability value of P ≤ 0.05<br />

was considered to represent a statistically significance difference<br />

among mean values.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Variation in yield and composition of essential oils<br />

The yield of essential oils of all four Mentha species ranged from<br />

7.00 to 17.0 g kg −1 (w/w) (Table 1). The minimum oil contents<br />

(7.00 g kg −1 ) were found in M. longifolia during winter, while<br />

the maximum yield (17.0 g kg −1 ) of essential oil of M. arvensis<br />

was during summer. All the tested Mentha species demonstrated<br />

higher essential oil yield in summer (when the plants were in full<br />

bloom) than in winter (when the plants reached the end of their<br />

growing cycle). Variations in the content of essential oils with<br />

respect to Mentha species and harvesting seasons were significant<br />

(P < 0.05). Our results are in agreement with those of Kofidis<br />

et al., 11 who also reported higher essential oil yield of M. spicata<br />

samples from late summer crops. In view of another report, the<br />

Thymbra spicata also exhibited maximum essential oil yield during<br />

summer, when the plants were in full bloom. 20<br />

The components found in the essential oils of each Mentha<br />

species at different seasons are reported in Table 1: 23 and 21;<br />

48 and 47; 35 and 36; 33 and 30 compounds were found in<br />

the essential oils of M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and<br />

M. spicata from summer and winter crops, respectively. The<br />

major constituents (>5%) in the essential oils of M. arvensis<br />

during summer and winter were found to be menthol (78.90%<br />

and 81.30%) and isomenthone (6.35% and 6.19%), respectively.<br />

The main components of M. piperita essential oils collected<br />

during summer and winter were menthone (28.13% and 25.54%),<br />

menthyl acetate (9.51% and 9.68%), limonene (7.58% and 7.73%)<br />

and isomenthone (4.04% and 7.63%), respectively. Piperitenone<br />

oxide (60.10% and 64.60%), piperitenone (6.37% and 1.97%) and<br />

germacrene D (5.13% and 5.97%), were the main components in<br />

the essential oils of wild-growing M. longifolia during summer and<br />

winter, respectively, while the major constituents of M. spicata<br />

essential oils from summer and winter harvests were determined<br />

to be carvone (59.50% and 63.24%), limonene (10.44% and 9.09%)<br />

and 1,8-cineol (6.36% and 4.51%), respectively. In addition, the<br />

tested Mentha essential oils also contained substantial amounts of<br />

various minor constituents, as detailed in Table 1.<br />

The analysed Mentha essential oils consisted mainly of oxygenated<br />

monoterpenes as a major fraction. Mentha arvensis,<br />

M. piperita, M. longifolia and M. spicata essential oils collected<br />

during summer and winter consisted of 95.71% and 97.06%;<br />

65.39% and 68.37%; 75.96% and 75.31%; 81.48% and 78.33%<br />

oxygenated monoterpenes, respectively. Menthol, menthone,<br />

piperitenone oxide and carvone were the main oxygenated<br />

monoterpenes in M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and M. spicata<br />

essential oils during both seasons, respectively. Mentha piperita,<br />

M. longifolia and M. spicata also contained considerable quantities<br />

of monoterpene hydrocarbons (13.95–17.62%; 7.03–7.24%;<br />

9.09–10.44%) and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (14.55–14.57;<br />

14.25–14.94; 6.12–8.30%), whereas M. arvensis had very low<br />

amounts of these compounds.<br />

The variation in the content of most of the essential oils<br />

investigated in the present study, with respect to species and<br />

harvesting season, was quantitatively significant (P < 0.05). Most<br />

fluctuation in oil components of M. arvensis includes menthone<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1829


1830<br />

Table 1. Seasonal variation in content and chemical composition of the essential oils from leaves of four Mentha species<br />

Composition (%) c<br />

Mentha arvensis Mentha piperita Mentha longifolia Mentha spicata<br />

Components a RI b Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Mode of identification d<br />

Monoterpene hydrocarbons<br />

α-Pinene 939 – – 3.53 ± 0.17b 1.31 ± 0.12a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Camphene 954 – – 0.16 ± 0.07 t – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Pinene 979 t – 5.70 ± 0.31d 4.30 ± 0.13c 2.01 ± 0.19a 2.42 ± 0.14b – – RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Myrecene 991 – – 0.29 ± 0.04b 0.11 ± 0.02a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

4-Carene 1022 – – t 0.05 ± 0.04 – – – – RI, MS<br />

p-Cymene 1025 – – 0.36 ± 0.10a 0.45 ± 0.10a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Limonene 1029 1.18 ± 0.14a 0.93 ± 0.14a 7.58 ± 0.25c 7.73 ± 0.20c 3.74 ± 0.11b 3.20 ± 0.13b 10.44 ± 0.31e 9.09 ± 0.27d RT, RI, MS<br />

cis-β-Ocimene 1037 – – – – 1.11 ± 0.10a 1.42 ± 0.14b – – RT, RI, MS<br />

γ -Terpinene 1060 – – – – 0.06 ± 0.04a 0.06 ± 0.01a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

δ-Terpinene 1089 – – – – 0.11 ± 0.03a 0.14 ± 0.07a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

www.soci.org AI Hussain et al.<br />

Oxygenated monoterpenes<br />

1,8-Cineol 1031 – – 0.90 ± 0.09a 1.06 ± 0.12a – – 6.36 ± 0.36c 3.51 ± 0.26b RT, RI, MS<br />

cis-Sabinene hydrate 1070 – – – – 0.08 ± 0.02a t 0.13 ± 0.04a t RT, RI, MS<br />

Linalool oxide 1088 0.05 ± 0.01 t – – – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Linalool 1097 0.37 ± 0.15b 0.17 ± 0.03a 0.61 ± 0.10c 1.48 ± 0.13d 0.89 ± 0.15c 0.77 ± 0.10c 0.71 ± 0.11c 3.13 ± 0.10e RT, RI, MS<br />

trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dienol 1123 – – – – – – 0.18 ± 0.09 t RI, MS<br />

trans-Pinocarveol 1139 0.08 ± 0.05 – – – – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Isopulegol 1147 0.45 ± 0.14a 0.43 ± 0.12a 0.53 ± 0.15a 0.63 ± 0.14a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Menthone 1152 4.42 ± 0.13c 1.38 ± 0.40b 28.13 ± 0.90e 25.54 ± 1.19d – – 0.61 ± 0.06a t RT, RI, MS<br />

Isomenthone 1162 6.35 ± 0.16b 9.19 ± 0.64d 4.04 ± 0.23a 7.63 ± 0.33c – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Borneol 1169 – – – – 13.3 ± 0.60d 4.36 ± 0.15b 1.38 ± 0.09a 5.90 ± 0.13c RT, RI, MS<br />

Menthol 1172 78.9 ± 1.6b 81.3 ± 2.0b 4.83 ± 0.18a 3.31 ± 0.11a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Terpinene-4-ol 1177 – – 2.66 ± 0.21b – 0.19 ± 0.03a 0.24 ± 0.05a 0.24 ± 0.07a 0.32 ± 0.06a RT, RI, MS<br />

p-Cymen-8-ol 1183 – – – – 0.20 ± 0.07a 0.21 ± 0.05a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Neoisomenthol 1187 0.54 ± 0.06a 0.53 ± 0.09a 6.53 ± 0.41c 2.23 ± 0.17b – – – – RI, MS<br />

α-Terpineol 1189 0.71 ± 0.11b 0.67 ± 0.12b – 6.13 ± 0.24d 0.19 ± 0.05a 0.07 ± 0.05a 1.32 ± 0.17c 0.49 ± 0.14b RT, RI, MS<br />

Myrtenal 1194 – – – – 0.11 ± 0.05a 0.10 ± 0.05a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Estragole 1195 0.27 ± 0.08a 0.29 ± 0.05a – – – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Dihydrocarveol 1197 – – – – – – 2.45 ± 0.17 t RT, RI, MS<br />

γ -Terpineol 1199 – – 2.34 ± 0.11a 2.61 ± 0.10a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

cis-Dihydrocarvone 1200 – – – – – – 4.84 ± 0.19b 1.47 ± 0.09a RT, RI, MS<br />

trans-Dihydrocarvone 1203 – – – – – – 0.27 ± 0.05 t RT, RI, MS<br />

trans-Carveol 1217 – – – – – – 0.34 ± 0.05 – RT, RI, MS<br />

cis-Carveol 1229 – – 0.18 ± 0.05a t – – 2.33 ± 0.10b t RT, RI, MS<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836


Biological activities of Mentha essnetial oils www.soci.org<br />

Table 1. (Continued)<br />

Composition (%) c<br />

Mentha arvensis Mentha piperita Mentha longifolia Mentha spicata<br />

Components a RI b Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Mode of identification d<br />

Pulegone 1237 0.75 ± 0.05b 0.35 ± 0.05a 4.42 ± 0.19e 6.42 ± 0.13f 3.91 ± 0.07d 2.10 ± 0.05c – – RT, RI, MS<br />

trans-Carane 1240 1.58 ± 0.20a 1.54 ± 0.13a – – – – RI, MS<br />

Carvone 1243 0.06 ± 0.05a 0.06 ± 0.06a 0.20 ± 0.05a 0.90 ± 0.09a – 0.08 ± 0.05a 59.5 ± 1.2b 63.24 ± 1.9c RT, RI, MS<br />

Carvone oxide 1247 – – – – – – 0.26 ± 0.05 – RI, MS<br />

Pipretone 1253 1.01 ± 0.05a 1.00 ± 0.06a – – – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Bornyl acetate 1289 – – – – 0.31 ± 0.05a 0.34 ± 0.05a 0.34 ± 0.05a – RI, MS<br />

Thymol 1290 – – – – 0.18 ± 0.06a 0.20 ± 0.05a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Menthyl acetate 1301 0.17 ± 0.05a 0.15 ± 0.06a 9.51 ± 0.18b 9.68 ± 0.29b – – – – RI, MS<br />

Isopulegyl acetate 1263 – – 0.35 ± 0.10b 0.30 ± 0.05a – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Piperitenone 1343 – – 0.15 ± 0.05a 0.45 ± 0.05b 16.4 ± 0.18d 1.97 ± 0.10c t 0.27 ± 0.07a RT, RI, MS<br />

Thymol acetate 1352 – – – – 0.12 ± 0.05a 0.27 ± 0.06b – – RT, RI, MS<br />

cis-Carvyl acetate 1368 – – – – – – 0.22 ± 0.05 t RT, RI, MS<br />

Piperitenone oxide 1370 – – – – 40.1 ± 1.1a 64.6 ± 1.6b – – RI, MS<br />

Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons<br />

α-Ylangene 1372 – – 0.31 ± 0.07a 0.30 ± 0.05a – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

α-Copaene 1377 – – 0.41 ± 0.05b 0.22 ± 0.10a 0.81 ± 0.05c 0.41 ± 0.07b – – RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Bourbonene 1388 0.23 ± 0.12a 0.17 ± 0.05a 1.82 ± 0.10f 1.12 ± 0.14c 0.61 ± 0.08b 0.31 ± 0.09a 0.93 ± 0.15c 0.56 ± 0.07b RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Elemene 1391 – – 0.84 ± 0.09a 0.99 ± 0.06a – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

cis-Jasmone 1393 – – 0.15 ± 0.05a 0.95 ± 0.10c 1.11 ± 0.17c 2.16 ± 0.06d t 0.34 ± 0.05b RT, RI, MS<br />

Longifolene 1409 – – 0.45 ± 0.05a 0.49 ± 0.06a – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

α-Gurjunene 1410 – – – – 0.34 ± 0.05b 0.24 ± 0.05a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Caryophyllene 1421 – – 3.55 ± 0.21c 2.55 ± 0.10b 4.22 ± 0.13d 2.53 ± 0.20b 2.75 ± 0.14b 2.02 ± 0.10a RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Cubebene 1423 – – 0.61 ± 0.06b 0.46 ± 0.05a – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Thujopsene 1426 – – 0.36 ± 0.05a 0.33 ± 0.05a – – – – RI, MS<br />

β-Copaene 1434 – – – – 0.17 ± 0.05a 0.13 ± 0.03a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

α-Bergamotene 1439 – – – – – – t 1.35 ± 0.08 RT, RI, MS<br />

Aromadendrene 1441 – – 0.49 ± 0.06a 0.69 ± 0.05b – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

α-Caryophyllene 1455 – – 0.71 ± 0.05b 0.31 ± 0.07a 0.62 ± 0.07b 0.30 ± 0.06a 0.75 ± 0.05b 0.32 ± 0.05a RT, RI, MS<br />

γ -Muurolene 1480 – – 0.95 ± 0.08c 0.99 ± 0.06c 0.57 ± 0.05b 0.94 ± 0.09c 0.29 ± 0.07a 0.59 ± 0.04b RT, RI, MS<br />

Germacrene D 1485 – – 0.69 ± 0.07a 1.69 ± 0.15b 5.13 ± 0.17c 5.97 ± 0.23f 0.83 ± 0.10a 1.40 ± 0.15b RT, RI, MS<br />

Ledene 1498 – – 0.51 ± 0.07a 0.71 ± 0.06b – – – – RI, MS<br />

α-Muurolene 1500 – – 0.73 ± 0.10a 0.77 ± 0.14a – – – – RT, RI, MS<br />

Bicyclogermacrene 1502 – – – – 0.13 ± 0.05a 0.94 ± 0.09c t 0.30 ± 0.08b RT, RI, MS<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1831


1832<br />

Table 1. (Continued)<br />

Composition (%) c<br />

Mentha arvensis Mentha piperita Mentha longifolia Mentha spicata<br />

Components a RI b Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Mode of identification d<br />

Cuparene 1505 – – 0.12 ± 0.05a 0.22 ± 0.06a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Amorphene 1441 – – 0.45 ± 0.07a 0.41 ± 0.12a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

β-Bisabolene 1506 – – – – 0.21 ± 0.05a 0.16 ± 0.05a – – RT, RI, MS<br />

γ -Cadinene 1514 – – – – t 0.16 ± 0.05a 0.21 ± 0.06a 0.75 ± 0.05b RT, RI, MS<br />

δ-Cadinene 1523 – – 1.21 ± 0.13a 1.02 ± 0.11a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

α-Cadinene 1539 – – 0.13 ± 0.05a 0.33 ± 0.06b – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Calamenene 1540 – – – – 0.33 ± 0.07a 0.69 ± 0.12b 0.36 ± 0.09a 0.67 ± 0.15b RT, RI, MS<br />

α-Calacorene 1546 – – 0.08 ± 0.05 – – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

www.soci.org AI Hussain et al.<br />

Oxygenated sesquiterpenes<br />

Elemol 1550 – – t 0.06 ± 0.01 – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

Spathulenol 1578 – – 0.47 ± 0.06b 0.78 ± 0.06c 0.09 ± 0.05a 0.46 ± 0.05b t 0.37 ± 0.08b RT, RI, MS<br />

Caryophyllene oxide 1583 0.19 ± 0.05a t 0.98 ± 0.13c 0.24 ± 0.08a 0.42 ± 0.05b 0.13 ± 0.05a 0.71 ± 0.05e 0.38 ± 0.05b RT, RI, MS<br />

α-Cedrol 1596 0.18 ± 0.05a 0.19 ± 0.06a 0.13 ± 0.05a 0.41 ± 0.09b – – RT, RI, MS<br />

1,10-Di-epi-cubenol 1616 – – – – – – 0.22 ± 0.07a 0.59 ± 0.05b RI, MS<br />

γ -Eudesmol 1632 0.26 ± 0.06a 0.17 ± 0.05a – – – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

α – Muurolol 1646 – – – – 0.27 ± 0.06a 0.51 ± 0.06b 0.56 ± 0.05b 1.63 ± 0.12c RT, RI, MS<br />

β-Eudesmol 1651 0.32 ± 0.05a 0.22 ± 0.07a 0.13 ± 0.05a 0.17 ± 0.05a – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

α-Cadinol 1654 0.16 ± 0.05 t – – – – – – RT, RI,MS<br />

α-Eudesmol 1656 0.19 ± 0.05b 0.12 ± 0.05a – – – – – – RI, MS<br />

Total 98.24 98.67 99.34 99.31 98.15 99.0 99.53 98.69<br />

Essential oil content (g kg−1 ) 17.0 ± 1.1e 9.20 ± 0.60b 12.2 ± 1.0d 10.5 ± 0.70c 10.8 ± 1.2c 7.00 ± 1.0a 12.0 ± 1.0d 9.50 ± 0.50b<br />

a Compounds are listed in order of elution from an HP-5 MS column.<br />

b Retention indices relative to C9 –C24 n-alkanes on HP-5 MS column.<br />

c Values are mean ± standard deviation of three different samples of each Mentha species, analysed individually in triplicate. Means followed by different letters (a–f) in the same row represent significant<br />

difference (P < 0.05).<br />

d RT, identification based on retention time; RI, identification based on retention index; MS, identification based on comparison of mass spectra.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836<br />

t, trace (


Biological activities of Mentha essnetial oils www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Seasonal variation in antimicrobial activity of essential oils from leaves of four Mentha species a<br />

Mentha arvensis Mentha piperita Mentha longifolia Mentha spicata<br />

Tested<br />

microorganisms Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter Summer Winter<br />

Agar disc diffusion methodb Staphylococcus aureus 32 ± 2c 33 ± 2c 16 ± 1a 15 ± 1a 31 ± 2c 29 ± 2bc 25 ± 2b 24 ± 2b<br />

Bacillus subtilis 33 ± 1c 33 ± 2c 17 ± 1a 20 ± 1a 29 ± 2b 31 ± 2bc 29 ± 2b 29 ± 2b<br />

Escherichia coli 14 ± 1ab 16 ± 1b 20 ± 2c 19 ± 2bc 16 ± 1b 17 ± 1b 14 ± 1ab 12 ± 1a<br />

Aspergillus niger 28 ± 1bc 30 ± 2c 30 ± 1c 25 ± 2b 28 ± 1bc 30 ± 2c 25 ± 2b 22 ± 0a<br />

Aspergillus flavus 21 ± 1a 25 ± 2b 22 ± 1a 20 ± 1a 29 ± 1c 30 ± 2c 26 ± 2b 29 ± 1c<br />

Alternaria solani 17 ± 1b 22±1c 14 ± 1a 15 ± 1ab 25 ± 2cd 23 ± 1c 27 ± 1d 23 ± 1c<br />

Fusarium solani 27 ± 2b 26 ± 2b 20 ± 2a 22 ± 2ab 27 ± 2b 25 ± 1b 24 ± 2ab 23 ± 2ab<br />

Rhizopus solani 29 ± 2ab 29 ± 2ab 32 ± 2b 28 ± 2a 30 ± 2bc 29 ± 2ab 28 ± 2a 27 ± 2a<br />

Alternaria alternata 30 ± 2d 30 ± 1d 18 ± 1b 15 ± 1a 29 ± 1d 23 ± 2c 19 ± 1b 17 ± 1ab<br />

Rhizopus spp. 16 ± 0b 18 ± 1c 12 ± 0a 11 ± 0a 19 ± 1cd 19 ± 1cd 20 ± 1d 16 ± 1b<br />

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, µg mL−1 )<br />

Staphylococcus aureus 30.5 ± 1.5b 20.0 ± 1.1a 120.6 ± 3.1e 120.3 ± 3.7e 32.3 ± 1.6b 40.2 ± 2.0c 78.0 ± 4.1d 80.0 ± 3.0d<br />

Bacillus subtilis 20.3 ± 1.0a 20.5 ± 0.6a 123.4 ± 5.8e 113.4 ± 4.5d 45.9 ± 1.6c 40.5 ± 1.6c 25.4 ± 1.1b 25.3 ± 1.1b<br />

Escherichia coli 330.3 ± 9.3bc 327.0 ± 6.1b 310.4 ± 7.2a 310.3 ± 7.5a 320.3 ± 9.2ab 310.0 ± 8.8a 345.3 ± 10.1c 349.2 ± 8.2c<br />

Aspergillus niger 63.5 ± 3.2b 58.3 ± 2.3ab 49.5 ± 3.0a 59.3 ± 2.7ab 82.5 ± 3.3 82.3 ± 3.5c 89.1 ± 5.1c 107.2 ± 4.3d<br />

Aspergillus flavus 110.7 ± 5.5d 83.3 ± 3.0c 122.0 ± 4.2e 127.4 ± 7.3e 60.3 ± 3.1a 59.3 ± 2.2a 81.4 ± 4.2c 69.3 ± 2.7b<br />

Alternaria solani 129.0 ± 7.7d 111.4 ± 5.2c 127.1 ± 5.0d 129.0 ± 7.2d 86.1 ± 2.2ab 93.7 ± 3.0b 81.3 ± 4.8a 101.5 ± 5.3bc<br />

Fusarium solani 89.8 ± 2.5ab 80.6 ± 2.7a 130.7 ± 6.7d 119.3 ± 4.7c 81.3 ± 2.7a 88.7 ± 4.7ab 89.7 ± 5.3ab 92.4 ± 4.6b<br />

Rhizopus solani 63.9 ± 3.2c 65.1 ± 3.1c 44.1 ± 2.5a 53.7 ± 2.2b 52.9 ± 2.1b 61.5 ± 3.0c 53.2 ± 3.1b 59.0 ± 3.0bc<br />

Alternaria alternata 57.9 ± 3.3a 56.2 ± 2.2a 117.0 ± 7.2d 131.0 ± 4.2e 82.5 ± 3.0b 99.4 ± 4.2c 122.0 ± 7.3d 133.1 ± 6.6e<br />

Rhizopus spp. 137.1 ± 5.5c 139.0 ± 4.2c 149.7 ± 8.2cd 157.8 ± 8.0d 125.0 ± 4.9b 130.1 ± 6.2bc 103.3 ± 4.1a 130.0 ± 7.8bc<br />

a Values are mean ± standard deviation of three different samples of each Mentha species, analysed individually in triplicate. Means followed by<br />

different letters in the same row represent significant difference (P < 0.05).<br />

b Diameter of inhibition zone (mm) including disc diameter of 6 mm.<br />

(4.42–1.38%) and isomenthone (6.35–9.19%) from summer and<br />

winter crops, respectively. The major variation in M. piperita<br />

essential oil includes isomenthone (4.04–7.63%), terpinene-<br />

4-ol (2.66%–trace), neoisomenthol (6.53–2.23%), α-terpineol<br />

(trace–6.13%) and pulegone (4.42–6.42%), respectively. In essential<br />

oil from M. longifolia, the major variation observed<br />

was in borneol (13.3–4.36%), piperitenone (16.4–1.97%) and<br />

piperitenone oxide (40.1–64.6%). Prominent variations in the<br />

essential oil components of M. spicata were observed in 1,8-cineol<br />

(6.36–3.51%), linalool (0.71–3.13%), borneol (4.84–1.47%), and<br />

cis-dihydrocarvone (4.84–1.47%), respectively.<br />

The yield of most of the compounds was higher in summer,<br />

while isomethane was found to be high in winter. The yield of<br />

pulegone was dependent on season, though it did not follow the<br />

same sequence for all plants.<br />

The variations in chemical composition of the essential oils<br />

with respect to season might have been due to the influence of<br />

phenological status, and environmental conditions can influence<br />

the regulation of the biosynthesis of essential oil. 21 Previous<br />

investigations have demonstrated that harvesting season can<br />

alter the chemical composition of the essential oils of M. spicata,<br />

M. pulegium and Ocimum basilicum. 8,11,20 Our results extend this<br />

understanding in the way that harvesting season can also alter<br />

composition of M. arvensis, M. piperita and M. longifolia essential<br />

oil. There are some reports in the literature on the qualitative and<br />

quantitative analyses of some Mentha essential oils from different<br />

countries, 1,2,22,23 but we could not find a single report showing the<br />

seasonal variation on the essential oils composition and biological<br />

activity of these four Mentha species. Therefore the results are<br />

different from others and indicate that this study is by no means a<br />

repetition.<br />

Antimicrobial activity<br />

The antimicrobial activities of Mentha essential oils and main<br />

components were assessed against a panel of plant and<br />

human pathogenic and food-borne microorganisms. As seen<br />

in Tables 2 and 3, the essential oils of M. arvensis, M. piperita,<br />

M. longifolia and M. spicata exhibited excellent antimicrobial<br />

activity against all the microorganisms tested. The results from<br />

the disc diffusion method followed by MIC indicated that M.<br />

arvensis showed maximum antimicrobial activity with larger IZ<br />

(14–33 and 16–30 mm) and smallest MIC values (20.0–330.3<br />

and 56.2–139.0 µgmL −1 ) against selected strains of bacteria and<br />

fungi, respectively. Mentha piperita, M. longifolia and M. spicata<br />

also exhibited good antimicrobial activities with IZ 15–20, 16–31,<br />

12–29 mm and 11–32, 19–30, 16–29 mm against bacterial and<br />

fungal strains, respectively. The MIC values of these oils were<br />

113.4–310.4, 32.3–320.3, 25.3–349.2 µgmL −1 and 44.1–157.8,<br />

52.9–130.1, 53.2–133.1 µgmL −1 , against strains of bacteria and<br />

fungi, respectively. Overall, all the tested essential oils showed<br />

high antibacterial activity against the Gram-positive bacteria<br />

tested, i.e. Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. Among<br />

the plant pathogenic fungi tested, Rhizopus solani, Aspergillus<br />

niger and Alternaria alternata were the most sensitive strains,<br />

while Rhizopus spp. was the most resistant strain tested. The<br />

variation in antimicrobial activities of Mentha essential oils with<br />

respect to species was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Seasonal<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1833


1834<br />

Table 3. Antimicrobial activity of pure components a<br />

www.soci.org AI Hussain et al.<br />

Tested microorganisms Menthol Menthone Piperitenone oxide Carvone Standard drugs b<br />

Agar disc diffusion methodc Staphylococcus aureus 32 ± 1c 25 ± 1b 22 ± 1a 23 ± 2ab 31 ± 2c<br />

Bacillus subtilis 32 ± 2b 30 ± 2b 24 ± 1a 25 ± 1a 33 ± 2b<br />

Escherichia coli 29 ± 2c 12 ± 1ab 8 ± 1a 14 ± 1b 30 ± 2c<br />

Aspergillus niger 29 ± 2b 26 ± 1ab 26 ± 1ab 24 ± 1a 30 ± 2b<br />

Aspergillus flavus 19 ± 1a 19 ± 0a 22 ± 1b 20 ± 1a 28 ± 1c<br />

Alternaria solani 21 ± 1c 17 ± 0b 21 ± 0c 16 ± 1ab 15 ± 1a<br />

Fusarium solani 28 ± 2b 24 ± 2ab 21 ± 1a 28 ± 2b 30 ± 2b<br />

Rhizopus solani 33 ± 2c 28 ± 2b 22 ± 1a 28 ± 2b 32 ± 2c<br />

Alternaria alternate 28 ± 2c 18 ± 1a 23 ± 1b 22 ± 1b 23 ± 1b<br />

Rhizopus spp. 24 ± 1c 11 ± 0a 21 ± 0b 23 ± 1c 22 ± 2b<br />

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, µg mL−1 )<br />

Staphylococcus aureus 30.0 ± 1.5a 90.9 ± 4.5c 80.0 ± 7.2b 80.3 ± 3.2b 10.2 ± 1.1a<br />

Bacillus subtilis 30.3 ± 1.2a 40.5 ± 2.1b 72.3 ± 2.9d 60.5 ± 3.5c 10.3 ± 1.5a<br />

Escherichia coli 80.5 ± 3.8a 189.1 ± 7.5c 310.2 ± 9.9d 170.4 ± 7.4b 69.5 ± 3.0a<br />

Aspergillus niger 78.3 ± 3.2b 88.0 ± 3.3cd 79.5 ± 5.5b 96.6 ± 5.3d 50.4 ± 2.7a<br />

Aspergillus flavus 107.7 ± 3.2c 103.2 ± 4.1bc 97.3 ± 3.8b 107.1 ± 3.3c 80.2 ± 2.5a<br />

Alternaria solani 101.2 ± 3.9b 123.3 ± 4.9c 113.0 ± 6.7b 133.5 ± 3.1d 90.0 ± 5.0a<br />

Fusarium solani 69.3 ± 2.7b 97.3 ± 3.8c 103.3 ± 8.1c 79.0 ± 8.0b 40.2 ± 2.4a<br />

Rhizopus solani 30.8 ± 1.2b 60.4 ± 2.2c 99.7 ± 9.3d 59.4 ± 2.1c 10.4 ± 1.6a<br />

Alternaria alternate 72.3 ± 3.0a 110.0 ± 4.8d 81.0 ± 3.5b 94.3 ± 4.6c 90.1 ± 4.2c<br />

Rhizopus spp. 90.0 ± 5.2a 204.1 ± 7.6b 97.2 ± 7.7a 89.0 ± 4.9a 100.0 ± 5.7a<br />

a Values are mean ± standard deviation of three different experiments. Means followed by different letters (a–d) in the same row represent significant<br />

difference (P < 0.05).<br />

b Amoxycillin for bacterial and fluconazole for fungal strains.<br />

c Diameter of inhibition zone (mm) including disc diameter of 6 mm.<br />

variation exercised notable effects on the antimicrobial activity<br />

of Mentha essential oils, but the trends observed were quite<br />

inconsistent.<br />

In our previous study, we investigated the variation in<br />

antimicrobial activity of Ocimum basilicum essential oils with<br />

respect to season. 8 Our results are in good agreement with the<br />

findings of Wannissorn et al., 24 who reported that M. arvensis<br />

essential oil exhibited good antimicrobial activity against a wide<br />

range of microorganisms. Our findings are contrary to those<br />

of Aridogan et al., 25 who recorded no antimicrobial activity of<br />

M. piperita essential oils against E. coli. This difference could<br />

be due to differences in chemical composition of the oils.<br />

In other reports 3,4 an essential oil from M. piperita exhibited<br />

good antimicrobial activity against both S. aureus and E. coli<br />

strains. There are also some reports in the literature on the<br />

antimicrobial activities of essential oils from M. longifolia and<br />

M. spicata. 1,26,27<br />

Menthol, menthone, piperitenone oxide and carvone, the major<br />

constituents of M. arvensis, M. piperita, M. longifolia and<br />

M. spicata, respectively, were also tested for their potential<br />

antimicrobial activity (Table 3). Menthol, the major component<br />

of M. arvensis, exhibited excellent antimicrobial activity<br />

(IZ 19–33 mm; MIC 30.0–107.7 µgmL −1 ) – even stronger than<br />

standard drugs (amoxycillin and fluconazole) – against all the<br />

strains tested. Menthone, piperitenone oxide and carvone also<br />

showed considerable antimicrobial activities, with 11–30, 8–26,<br />

14–28 mm inhibition zones and MIC values of 40.5–204.1,<br />

72.3–310.2, 59.4–170.4 µg mL −1 against the selected microorganisms.<br />

The excellent antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of<br />

M. arvensis could be attributed to the high content of menthol<br />

present in it. Iscan et al. 3 reported that menthol seems<br />

to be the constituent responsible for antimicrobial activity.<br />

Essential oils rich in compounds of known antimicrobial activities<br />

such as menthone, piperitone oxide, carvone and linalool<br />

are widely reported to possess high levels of antimicrobial<br />

activity. 6,7,16,28<br />

Cytotoxicity of Mentha essential oils<br />

The MTT assay is a sensitive, simple and reliable approach used<br />

to evaluate the cytotoxicity of plant-based products. The effect<br />

of increasing amounts of the tested Mentha essential oils on<br />

the cell proliferation of two human cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and<br />

LNCaP) was appraised. The inhibitory effect of Mentha essential<br />

oils on cell viability ranged from 91% to 97% at 0.5 mg mL −1<br />

(data not shown). IC50 values, calculated from the graphs, are<br />

presented in Table 4, indicating that the tested Mentha essential<br />

oils showed prominent cytotoxic activity against both cancer cell<br />

lines. The cytotoxicity of M. longifolia essential oils against MCF-<br />

7(IC50 45.2 and 50.6 µg mL −1 for summer and winter samples,<br />

respectively) and LNCaP (IC50 43.5 and 52.0 µgmL −1 for summer<br />

and winter samples, respectively) were notably stronger than<br />

those of other oils (Table 4). Among the two cancer cell lines<br />

employed, LNCaP was more sensitive than MCF-7. ANOVA showed<br />

significant (P < 0.05) variation in toxicity with respect to species<br />

and season. According to published guidelines, IC50 < 10 µgmL −1<br />

represents potentially ‘very toxic’; IC50 10–100 µgmL −1 represents<br />

‘potentially toxic’; IC50 100–1000 µg mL represents ‘potentially<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836


Biological activities of Mentha essnetial oils www.soci.org<br />

Table 4. Seasonal variation in cytotoxicity of essential oils from leaves<br />

of four Mentha species a<br />

Cytotoxic activity IC50 (µgmL −1 )<br />

Species Season MCF-7 LN-CaP<br />

Mentha arvensis Summer 55.3 ± 1.9d 50.2 ± 2.7c<br />

Winter 59.7 ± 2.2e 55.7 ± 1.5d<br />

Mentha piperita Summer 75.2 ± 2.9f 90.4 ± 3.7f<br />

Winter 80.8 ± 3.2g 95.7 ± 4.5f<br />

Mentha longifolia Summer 45.2 ± 2.0b 43.5 ± 2.1b<br />

Winter 50.6 ± 2.0c 52.0 ± 3.0cd<br />

Mentha spicata Summer 80.0 ± 2.4g 75.8 ± 2.3e<br />

Winter 80.6 ± 2.0g 90.0 ± 3.0f<br />

Doxorubicin 28.8 ± 1.2a 33.3 ± 1.1a<br />

a Values are mean ± standard deviation of three different samples of<br />

each Mentha species, analysed individually in triplicate. Means followed<br />

by different letters (a–g) in the same column represent significant<br />

difference (P < 0.05).<br />

harmful’ and IC50 > 1000 µgmL −1 represents ‘potentially nontoxic’.<br />

29<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

In general, harvesting season affected the chemical composition as<br />

well as the biological activities of Mentha essential oils. The results<br />

of the present study indicate that Mentha essential oils possess<br />

very good antimicrobial and cytotoxic potential. A further study<br />

under in vivo conditions is recommended to further elaborate the<br />

biological activities of Mentha essential oils for various applications.<br />

The investigated essential oils of Mentha species may be used for<br />

the preservation of processed foods as well as pharmaceutical<br />

and natural therapies for the treatment of infectious diseases in<br />

humans and plants, and the information observed on seasonal<br />

variation may be useful in selecting the best season for optimal<br />

yield.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We would like to extend our special gratitude to Professor Dr<br />

MI Bhanger, Director, National Center of Excellence in Analytical<br />

Chemistry (NCEAC), University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan, for<br />

providing the GC–MS instrumental facility. Thanks are due to<br />

the Higher Education Commission for the award of a scholarship<br />

to AI Hussain under the scheme ‘International <strong>Research</strong> Support<br />

Initiative Program (IRSIP)’ to conduct a part of the project work in<br />

the UK.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 GulluceM,ShainF,SokmenM,OzerH,DafereraD,SokmenA, et al,<br />

Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of the essential oils and<br />

methanol extract from Mentha longifolia L. spp. longifolia. Food<br />

Chem 103:1449–1456 (2007).<br />

2 Pandey AK, Rai MK and Acharya D, Chemical composition and<br />

antimycotic activity of the essential oils of corn mint (Mentha<br />

arvensis) andlemongrass(Cymbopogon flexuosus) againsthuman<br />

pathogenic fungi. Pharm Biol 41:421–425 (2003).<br />

3 Iscan G, Kirimer N, Kurkcuoglu M, Baser KHC and Demirci F,<br />

Antimicrobial screening of Mentha piperita essential oils. J Agric<br />

Food Chem 50:3943–3946 (2002).<br />

4 Yadegarinia D, Gachkar L, Rezaei MB, Taghizadeh M, Astaneh SA and<br />

Rasooli I, Biochemical activities of Iranian Mentha piperita L. and<br />

Mentha communis L. essential oils. Phytochemistry 67:1249–1255<br />

(2006).<br />

5 Kaur C and Kapoor HC, Anti-oxidant activity and total phenolic content<br />

of some Asian vegetables. Int J Food Sci Technol 37:153–161 (2002).<br />

6 Bendaoud H, Bouajila J, Rhouma A, Savagnac A and Romdhane M,<br />

GC/MS analysis and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of<br />

essential oil of Eucalyptus radiate. J Sci Food Agric 89:1292–1297<br />

(2009).<br />

7 Mimica-Dukic N, Bozin B, Sokovic M, Mihajlovic B and Matavulj M,<br />

Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of three Mentha species<br />

essential oils. Planta Med 69:413–419 (2003).<br />

8 Hussain AI, Anwar F, Sherazi STH and Przybylski R, Chemical<br />

composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of basil<br />

(Ocimum basilicum) essential oils depends on seasonal variations.<br />

Food Chem 108:986–995 (2008).<br />

9 KoenenEV, Medicinal Poisonous and Edible Plants in Namibia. Klaus<br />

Hess, Berlin (2001).<br />

10 Eloff JN, It is possible to use the herbarium specimens to screen for<br />

antibacterial activity components in some plants. J Ethnopharmacol<br />

67:355–360 (1999).<br />

11 Kofidis G, Bosabalidis A and Kokkini S, Seasonal variation of essential<br />

oils in a linalool-rich chemotype of Mentha spicata grown wild in<br />

Greece. J Essent Oil Res 16:469–472 (2004).<br />

12 Celiktas OY, Kocabas EEH, Bedir E, Sukan FV, Ozek T and Baser KHC,<br />

Antimicrobial activities of methanol extracts and essential oils<br />

of Rosmarinus officinalis, depending on location and seasonal<br />

variations. Food Chem 100:553–559 (2007).<br />

13 Massada Y, Analysis of Essential Oils by Gas Chromatography and Mass<br />

Spectrometry. Wiley, New York (1976).<br />

14 Mass Spectral Library, NIST/EPA/NIH. National Institute of Standards<br />

and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2002).<br />

15 Adam RP, Identification of essential oils components by gas<br />

chromatography/quadrupole mass spectroscopy. Allured Publishing,<br />

Carol Stream, IL (2001).<br />

16 Vagionas K, Graikou K, Ngassapa O, Runyoro D and Chinou I,<br />

Composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils of three<br />

Satureja species growing in Tanzania. Food Chem 103:319–324<br />

(2007).<br />

17 NCCLS, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility Test<br />

(6th edn). Approved Standard M2-A6, National Committee for<br />

Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA (1997).<br />

18 NCCLS, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disc Susceptibility<br />

Testing (9th int. suppl.). M100-S9, National Committee for Clinical<br />

Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA (1999).<br />

19 Mosmann T, Rapid colorimetric assay or cellular growth and survival:<br />

application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Meth<br />

65:55–63 (1983).<br />

20 Muller-Riebau F, Berger BM, Yegen O and Cakir C, Seasonal variation<br />

in the chemical composition of essential oils of selected aromatic<br />

plants growing wild in Turkey. J Agric Food Chem 45:4821–4825<br />

(1997).<br />

21 Masotti V, Juteau F, Bessiere JM and Viano J, Seasonal and<br />

phonological variation of the essential oil from the narrow endemic<br />

species Artemisia molinieri and its biological activities. J Agric Food<br />

Chem 51:7115–7121 (2003).<br />

22 Singh AK, Raina VK, Naqvi AA, Patra NK, Kumar B, Ram P, et al, Essential<br />

oil composition and chemoarrays of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis<br />

L.) cultivars. Flavour Frag J 20:302–305 (2005).<br />

23 Viljoen AM, Petkar S, Van-Vuuren SF, Figueiredo AC, Pedro LG and<br />

Barroso JG, The chemo-geographical variation in essential oil<br />

composition and the antimicrobial properties of wild mint, Mentha<br />

longifolia subsp. polyadena (Lamiaceae) in Southern Africa. J Essent<br />

Oil Res 18:60–65 (2006).<br />

24 Wannissorn B, Jarikasem S, Siriwangchai T and Thubthimthed S,<br />

Antibacterial properties of essential oils from Thai medicinal plants.<br />

Fitoterapia 76:233–236 (2005).<br />

25 Aridogan BC, Baydar H, Kaya S, Demirici M, Ozbasar D and Mumcu E,<br />

Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of some essential<br />

oils. Arch Pharmacol Res 25:860–864 (2002).<br />

26 Sokovic M and Griensven LJLDV, Antimicrobial activity of essential oils<br />

and their components against the three major pathogens of the<br />

cultivated button mushroom, Agaricus bisporus. Eur J Plant Pathol<br />

116:211–224 (2006).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1835


1836<br />

27 Aggarwal KK, Khanuja SPS, Ahmad A, Kumar TRS, Gupta VK and<br />

Kumar S, Antimicrobial activity profile of the two enantiomers<br />

of limonene and carvone isolated from the oils of Mentha spicata<br />

and Anethum sowa. Flavour Frag J 17:59–63 (2002).<br />

28 Sivropoulou A, Kokkini S, Lanaras T and Arsenakis M, Antimicrobial<br />

activity of mint essential oils. J Agric Food Chem 43:2384–2388<br />

(1995).<br />

www.soci.org AI Hussain et al.<br />

29 Gad-Shayne C, Alternatives to in vivo studies in toxicology, in General<br />

and Applied Toxicology, Vol. 6. John Wiley & Sons Inc. (2009).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1827–1836


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 3 February 2010 Revised: 23 April 2010 Accepted: 25 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 14 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4022<br />

Impact of glycated pea proteins on the activity<br />

of free-swimming and immobilised bacteria<br />

Dominika ´Swia¸tecka, a∗ Henryk Kostyra a and Aleksander ´Swia¸tecki b<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Glycation (non-enzymatic glycosylation), a spontaneously occurring process, is responsible for alteration of the<br />

structures and biological activities of proteins, making them highly active. Regrettably, information regarding the impact of<br />

glycated food proteins on intestinal bacteria still remains sparse. Pea seeds are considered to be a biological material of a high<br />

nutritional value, low content of anti-nutritional substances and proven health-promoting action and therefore they were used<br />

in this study. Since glycated pea proteins are proven to display a lowered susceptibility to the enzymatic digestion, their impact<br />

on the activity of both free-swimming and immobilised bacteria was studied.<br />

RESULTS: In vitro model systems were used to prove the stimulatory impact of glycated pea proteins on the proliferation rate<br />

and survival, as well as on the metabolic activity of free-swimming and immobilised bacteria.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: This phenomenon is of great importance because glycated food proteins are not only a source of nutrients and<br />

energy but also display new properties and increased biological activities. Additionally, they are able to modify the bacterial<br />

intestinal ecosystem, thus affecting the general health status of a consumer.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: free-swimming bacteria; immobilised bacteria; glycated pea proteins; non-enzymatic glycosylation; proliferation rate; survival<br />

rate; metabolic activity<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Legumes have always been considered as a substantial element<br />

of the human diet. Although they are a food consumed mostly by<br />

paupers in the past, they have now gained wide recognition and<br />

are consumed by everyone regardless of social status. Legumes<br />

are a good source of protein, polysaccharides and vitamins, and<br />

hence are used worldwide in both human and animal nutrition. 1,2<br />

The pea (Pisum sativum L.) is a long established and significant<br />

crop with a worldwide production exceeded only by soybeans,<br />

peanuts and dry beans. 3 This legume has extraordinary nutritional<br />

potential derived from its high levels of good quality protein,<br />

antioxidants and fibre, as well as complex carbohydrates with a<br />

low glycaemic index. 4–7 Therefore, pea proteins, which contain<br />

high levels of nutritionally valuable lysine, are recommended<br />

as a constituent of the human diet due to their acknowledged<br />

beneficial effect. Nevertheless, lysine may trigger a spontaneous<br />

non-enzymatic glycosylation process (glycation, the Maillard<br />

reaction) which occurs during storage and processing of food<br />

products. 8–10 This glycosylation process influences the structure<br />

of food proteins, leading to modifications in their properties and<br />

biological functions. 11–13 Interestingly, glycated food proteins<br />

often display a lowered susceptibility to enzymatic degradation<br />

and therefore may at least partially escape digestion and reach<br />

the lower parts of the gastrointestinal tract. That is of great<br />

importance for the intestines, especially the colon, which serves as<br />

an ecosystem of microorganisms. Intestinal bacteria are not only<br />

considered essential for the maintenance of homeostasis of the<br />

local, intestinal environment but also for the general health status<br />

of the consumer. Therefore, an extensive understanding of proper<br />

nutrition ought to include functions of the intestinal ecosystem as<br />

well as prolonged biological activities of modified biomolecules,<br />

such as the glycated food proteins. Drastic insufficiencies in the<br />

findings concerning the above-mentioned issue require studies<br />

with simplified experimental models to understand the basic<br />

interactions between glycated proteins and bacteria as well as<br />

their ensuing implications. For that reason, this study aimed to<br />

determine the impact of glycated pea proteins on various bacteria<br />

in different life forms.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Material<br />

Raw peas (Pisum sativum L.) of the Polish variety Ramrod were<br />

delivered from the Production and Experimental <strong>Research</strong> Station,<br />

located in Ba3cyny, Poland, and were subsequently ground to<br />

flour in a W˙Z-1 grinder (ZBPP Sadkiewicz Instruments, Bydgoszcz,<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Dominika ´Swia¸tecka, Food Immunology and Microbiology<br />

Department at theInstituteof Animal Reproduction andFood<strong>Research</strong><br />

of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. J. Tuwima 10, 10-747 Olsztyn, Poland.<br />

E-mail: d.swiatecka@pan.olsztyn.pl<br />

a Food Immunology and Microbiology Department at the Institute of Animal<br />

Reproduction and Food <strong>Research</strong> of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul.<br />

J. Tuwima 10, 10-747 Olsztyn, Poland<br />

b Department of Microbiology at the Faculty of Biology of the University of<br />

Warmia and Mazury, ul. M. Oczapowskiego 1A, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1837


1838<br />

Poland) and subsequently sieved through a standard 0.20 mm<br />

sieve (NAGEMA, Magdeburg, Germany).<br />

Protein extraction<br />

Samples (35 g) of the ground pea flour were extracted with<br />

140 mL of 50 mmol L −1 Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) for 1 h at 4 ◦ Cwith<br />

constant agitation and subsequently centrifuged (20 000 × g,<br />

20 min). The extraction was repeated twice. The supernatant,<br />

containing albumins and globulins, was dialysed at 4 ◦ Cfor48h<br />

against distilled water and lyophilised later. 14<br />

Bacterial strains and growth conditions<br />

The strains Bacillus subtilis PCM 1903, Enterococcus faecalis PCM<br />

1861, Enterococcus faecium PCM 1859, Enterobacter aerogenes<br />

PCM 532, Escherichia coli PCM 360, Proteus mirabilis PCM 543,<br />

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PCM 1113, Staphylococcus aureus PCM<br />

517 and Staphylococcus saprophyticus PCM 2109 were obtained<br />

from the Polish Collection of Microorganisms, the Institute of<br />

Immunology and Experimental Therapy of the Polish Academy<br />

of Sciences (Wroc3aw, Poland), whereas Escherichia coli 22 and<br />

Lactobacillus acidophilus 15 were obtained from the Faculty of<br />

Food Science of the University of Warmia and Mazury (Olsztyn,<br />

Poland). The strains were isolated from human faeces.<br />

Cultivation of these species was carried out aerobically in 37 ◦ C<br />

on selected media. Bacteria from the genera Bacillus, Escherichia,<br />

Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Proteus and Staphylococcus were<br />

grown on a nutrient broth medium (Biocorp, Warsaw, Poland),<br />

whereas bacteria from the genus Enterococcus were grown on a<br />

brain heart infusion medium (BHI; BioMerieux, Warsaw, Poland)<br />

and L. acidophilus weregrownonandeMan,RogosaandSharpe<br />

medium (MRS) medium (BTL, Warsaw, Poland).<br />

Preparation of bacterial inoculum<br />

Particular bacteria were transferred from agar slants into liquid<br />

medium (as described in the previous section) and incubated<br />

for 24/48 h at 37 ◦ C. The overnight cultures were refreshed by<br />

transferring 0.5 mL into freshly prepared liquid media and again<br />

incubated under identical conditions with constant absorbance<br />

measurement until reaching Aλ=550 nm = 0.2. The absorbance was<br />

measured with diode spectrophotometer (DU 7500; Beckman,<br />

Warsaw, Poland) by separating an aliquot of the culture medium.<br />

Such prepared bacterial suspensions were used for inoculation in<br />

further microbial analysis.<br />

The dynamics of bacterial proliferation in a liquid medium<br />

Liquid, 100-fold diluted media for bacterial growth (as described<br />

in the section ‘Bacterial strains and growth conditions’) were<br />

supplemented respectively with the non-glycated pea proteins<br />

and the glycated pea proteins to achieve the final concentration<br />

of 1 mg mL −1 . The cultures were subsequently inoculated with<br />

1% of the particular bacterial strain. The cultures without any<br />

pea protein hydrolysates or pea protein extract supplementation<br />

were treated as controls of bacterial growth rate. Cultivation<br />

was conducted at 37 ◦ C with constant, gentle agitation to<br />

ensure the optimal nutrients usage. Four measurements were<br />

conducted during the whole duration of the experiment and<br />

samples were collected at regular 3 h intervals for fluorescence<br />

analysis. Total bacterial numbers, resulting from the exposition<br />

to the tested pea proteins, were estimated with the use of 4 ′ ,6diamidino-phenylindole<br />

(DAPI). 15 After 15 min incubation with<br />

www.soci.org D ´Swia¸tecka, H Kostyra, A ´Swia¸tecki<br />

DAPI in the dark, at room temperature and with constant, gentle<br />

agitation for optimal fluorochrome accessibility, the samples<br />

were filtrated trough 0.2 µm black polycarbonate filters (Millipore,<br />

Warsaw, Poland), air dried and mounted on a microscopic slide<br />

with a drop of Citifluor (Cargille, Stem-Service, Warsaw, Poland)<br />

and subsequently analysed microscopically. The experiment was<br />

repeated three times for statistical analysis.<br />

The survival rate of bacteria in liquid, mineral medium<br />

Sterile, experimentally chosen salt solutions (0.8% NaCl) were<br />

used to create a nutrient-poor growth environment. These media<br />

were supplemented with the non-glycated pea proteins and the<br />

glycated pea proteins to give the final concentration 1.0 mg mL −1 .<br />

The cultures without any supplementations were treated as<br />

controls of bacterial growth rate and dying out. Subsequently,<br />

the cultures were inoculated with 2% of particular bacterial<br />

strain and incubated at 37 ◦ C for 10 days with constant, gentle<br />

agitation for proper nutrient accessibility and avoidance of clumps<br />

formation. The duration of the experiment was estimated in<br />

a preliminary study, which indicated the increase of artefacts<br />

occurrence after the 10th day of the experiment. In experimentally<br />

predetermined time intervals (0, 4, 7 and 10 days of incubation),<br />

the samples were collected and incubated with the Live/Dead<br />

Bacterial Viability Kit (Molecular Probes, Warsaw, Poland) to<br />

determine the percentage of dead bacterial cells. 16,17 After<br />

15 min of incubation with the kit, the samples were filtered<br />

through 0.2 µm black polycarbonate filters (Millipore), air dried<br />

and mounted on microscopic slides with a drop of BacLight<br />

Mounting Oil (Molecular Probes) and subsequently analysed<br />

microscopically.<br />

Metabolic activity and survival of immobilised bacteria<br />

The bacteria were grown on 0.45 µm nitrocellulose filters<br />

(Millipore) placed on the previously prepared solid, sterile<br />

media (as described in the section ‘Bacterial strains and growth<br />

conditions’) supplemented with the non-glycated pea proteins<br />

and the glycated pea proteins to give the final concentration<br />

of 1.5 mg mL −1 at 37 ◦ C. A higher concentration of analysed<br />

substrates was used due to their hindered diffusion in the solid<br />

medium. Small pieces of the mentioned filters were rinsed with<br />

5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC; Polyscience, Inc.,<br />

Poznan, Poland) at regular 3 h intervals and incubated for 1 h in<br />

ordertoassesstherateofCTCreduction. 18 The Live/Dead Bacterial<br />

Viability Kit (Molecular Probes) was used to evaluate bacterial<br />

membrane integrity. The CTC was used at the concentration of<br />

5 mmol L −1 in order to exclude the toxic effect of tetrazolium<br />

salts on the bacteria. 19 Later, the filters were washed with distilled<br />

water, air dried and mounted on slides and analysed under an<br />

epifluorescence microscope.<br />

Microscopic analysis of bacteria<br />

The bacterial number, survival rate and metabolic activity were<br />

examined with an epifluorescence microscope Olympus U-RFL-T<br />

(Olympus, Olsztyn, Poland) equipped with filters BP 360 nm, BA<br />

420 nm, DM 400 nm (for the TBN), BP 530–550 nm, BA 590 nm,<br />

DM 570 nm (for the estimation of dead and alive bacteria) and BP<br />

546 nm,BA590DM320(forthemetabolicactivity).Themicroscope<br />

was equipped with the automatic MultiScan Program for image<br />

analysis (Computer Scanning Systems II, Warsaw, Poland).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845


Impact of pea proteins on types of bacteria www.soci.org<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

(A) (B) (C)<br />

E. coli 22 E. aerogenes L. acidophilus<br />

(D) (E) (F)<br />

E. faecalis E. faecium P. aeruginosa<br />

(G)<br />

P. mirabilis B. subtilis S. saprophyticus<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(J) (K)<br />

100<br />

E. coli 360 S. aureus<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 3 6 9<br />

Time [hours]<br />

(H) (I)<br />

0 3 6 9<br />

Time [hours]<br />

Figure 1. The impact of the non-glycated and the glycated pea proteins on the proliferation rate of bacteria: (A) E. coli 22, (B) E. aerogenes,(C)L. acidophilus,<br />

(D) E. faecalis,(E)E. faecium,(F)P. aeruginosa,(G)P. mirabilis,(H)B. subtilis,(I)S. saprophyticus,(J)E. coli 360, and (K) S. aureus.( ), The control culture;<br />

(- - - - ), the culture supplemented with pea proteins; ( .... ), the culture supplemented with glycated pea proteins. TBN, total bacterial number.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The results obtained were analysed statistically with the Statistica 8<br />

Program (StatSoft Poland, Cracow, Poland). The standard error was<br />

used to demonstrate the results obtained. Each mean value for the<br />

bacteria per cell represents the results of three experiments. The<br />

statistical significance was determined by the variance analysis<br />

using the F distribution by Fisher.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The impact of the non-glycated (N) and the glycated (G) pea<br />

proteins on the proliferation rate of the referential bacterial strains<br />

in liquid cultures is presented in Fig. 1. The experiment confirmed<br />

the stimulatory influence of the glycated pea proteins (G) on the<br />

proliferation activity of all bacteria (Fig. 1). The observed effect<br />

did not depend on the bacterial cell wall type (gram positive and<br />

negative bacteria). A stronger stimulatory impact of the glycated<br />

pea proteins than that of the non-glycated ones C < N < G) was<br />

observedinthecaseof E.aerogenes(Fig. 1B),L.acidophilus(Fig. 1C),<br />

E. faecalis (Fig. 1D), P. aeruginosa (Fig. 1F), P. mirabilis (Fig. 1G),<br />

S. saprophyticus (Fig. 1I) and B. subtilis (Fig. 1H). At the same time,<br />

the non-glycated pea proteins (N) were stronger stimulators than<br />

the glycated ones (G) in the case of proliferation of E. coli 360<br />

(Fig. 1J) and E.faecium (Fig. 1E). Interestingly, the non-glycated pea<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1839


1840<br />

proteins caused a constant, statistically significant decrease of the<br />

proliferation rate of E. coli 22 (Fig. 1A) in comparison to the control<br />

culture (C) and the culture supplemented with the glycated pea<br />

proteins. Additionally, the non-glycated pea proteins (N) caused a<br />

decrease of the proliferation rate of L. acidophilus (Fig. 1C) at the<br />

beginning of the cultivation period when compared to the control<br />

culture (C).<br />

The impact of the non-glycated (N) and the glycated pea<br />

proteins (G) on the dying out of bacteria in nutrient-poor cultures<br />

(A)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(B)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(C)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(D)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(E)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

E. coli 22<br />

100 E. aerogenes<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100 L. acidophilus<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

E. faecalis<br />

www.soci.org D ´Swia¸tecka, H Kostyra, A ´Swia¸tecki<br />

C N G<br />

E. coli 22<br />

is demonstrated in Fig. 2. The survival of Gram-positive bacteria<br />

was increased by supplementing the media with non-glycated<br />

peaproteinsaswellasglycatedones(Fig.2C–E,H,IandK).<br />

The glycated pea proteins (G) had a stronger stimulatory effect,<br />

increasing the survival time of the bacteria in comparison to<br />

the non-glycated pea proteins (N) in the case of the cultures of<br />

L. acidophilus (Fig. 2C) and S. saprophyticus (Fig. 2I). The survival<br />

rate of the rest of the Gram-positive bacterial strains (Fig. 2D, E,<br />

H and K) was strengthened by supplementing the cultures with<br />

E. coli 22<br />

E. aerogenes E. aerogenes<br />

L. acidophilus<br />

L. acidophilus<br />

E. faecalis E. faecalis<br />

500 E. faecium E. faecium E. faecium<br />

1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10<br />

Time [days]<br />

Time [days]<br />

Time [days]<br />

Figure 2a. The impact of the non-glycated and the glycated pea proteins on the bacterial survival rate. Vertically: (A) E. coli 22, (B) E. aerogenes,<br />

(C) L. acidophilus,(D)E. faecalis,(E)E. faecium,(F)P. aeruginosa,(G)P. mirabilis,(H)B. subtilis,(I)S. saprophyticus,(J)E. coli 360, and (K) S. aureus. Horizontally:<br />

C, cultures without any protein supplementation; N, cultures supplemented with non-glycated pea proteins; and G, cultures supplemented with glycated<br />

pea proteins. ( ), Total bacterial number (TBN); ( .... ), percentage of dead bacterial cells.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells


Impact of pea proteins on types of bacteria www.soci.org<br />

Figure 2b. (Continued).<br />

(F)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(G)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(H)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(I)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(J)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

(K)<br />

TBN [n x 10 4 ]<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

400<br />

320<br />

240<br />

160<br />

80<br />

0<br />

400<br />

320<br />

240<br />

160<br />

80<br />

0<br />

P. aeruginosa P. aeruginosa P. aeruginosa<br />

P. mirabilis<br />

P. mirabilis P. mirabilis<br />

B. subtilis B. subtilis B. subtilis<br />

S. saprophyticus S. saprophyticus S. saprophyticus<br />

E. coli 360<br />

C N G<br />

E. coli 360<br />

E. coli 360<br />

S. aureus S. aureus S. aureus<br />

1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10 1 4 7 10<br />

Time [days]<br />

Time [days]<br />

Time [days]<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead bacterial cells<br />

% of dead cells<br />

% komórek matwych<br />

1841


1842<br />

non-glycated pea proteins (N) rather than with glycated ones (G).<br />

However, in spite of the initial high percentage of dead cells in the<br />

culture of E. faecalis (Fig. 2D) supplemented with the non-glycated<br />

pea proteins, the presence of these proteins eventually increased<br />

the survival time in the culture. The non-glycated (N) and the<br />

glycated pea proteins (G) decreased the percentage of the dead<br />

bacterial cells in the cultures of Gram-negative bacteria from the<br />

genera Enterobacter (Fig. 2B) and Pseudomonas (Fig. 2F). There was<br />

no statistically significant impact of the non-glycated pea proteins<br />

on the survival of bacteria from the genera Escherichia (Fig. 2A and<br />

J) and Proteus (Fig. 2G), whereas the non-glycated pea proteins<br />

CTC+ [n x 10 2 ]<br />

CTC+ [n x 10 2 ]<br />

CTC+ [n x 10 2 ]<br />

240<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

240<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

240<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

E. coli 22<br />

www.soci.org D ´Swia¸tecka, H Kostyra, A ´Swia¸tecki<br />

(A) (B) (C)<br />

(D)<br />

(G) significantly decreased the percentage of the dead cells in the<br />

culture of P. mirabilis (Fig. 2G). Although the glycated pea proteins<br />

increased the percentage of dead bacterial cells in the bacterial<br />

cultures from the genus Escherichia (Fig. 2A and J) at the final stage<br />

of the cultivation, it did not differ significantly from the control<br />

culture (C) and culture supplemented with the non-glycated pea<br />

proteins (N).<br />

Figure 3 presents the metabolic activity of bacteria immobilised<br />

to solid surfaces measured by the content of CTC formazan (CTF).<br />

Metabolic activity of the immobilised bacteria began after an<br />

adaptive period, which lasted 2 h in the case of E. coli 22 (Fig. 3A),<br />

E. aerogenes L. acidophilus<br />

(E) (F)<br />

E. faecalis E. faecium P. aeruginosa<br />

(G)<br />

(H) (I)<br />

P. mirabilis B. subtilis S. saprophyticus<br />

CTC+ [n x 10 2 ]<br />

240<br />

200<br />

160<br />

120<br />

80<br />

40<br />

0<br />

(J)<br />

E. coli 360<br />

(K)<br />

S. aureus<br />

0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8<br />

Time [hours]<br />

Time [days]<br />

Figure 3. The impact of non-glycated and glycated pea proteins on the metabolic activity of bacteria forming a biofilm. (A) E. coli 22, (B) E. aerogenes,<br />

(C) L. acidophilus, (D)E. faecalis, (E)E. faecium, (F)P. aeruginosa, (G)P. mirabilis, (H)B. subtilis, (I)S. saprophyticus, (J)E. coli 360 and (K) S. aureus. ( ),<br />

Control culture; (- - - - ), the culture supplemented with non-glycated pea proteins; ( .... ), the culture supplemented with glycated pea proteins.<br />

TBN, total bacterial number.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845


Impact of pea proteins on types of bacteria www.soci.org<br />

E. aerogenes (Fig. 3B) and S. aureus (Fig.3K)and4hinthecase<br />

of the other bacterial strains, except for L. acidophilus (Fig. 3C),<br />

which was metabolically active from the very beginning of the<br />

cultivation period. Both the non-glycated (N) and the glycated<br />

pea proteins (G) functioned as good energetic substrates as they<br />

increased the metabolic activity of many examined bacterial<br />

strains: E. coli 22 (Fig. 3A), E. aerogenes (Fig. 3B), L. acidophilus<br />

(Fig. 3C), P. aeruginosa (Fig. 3F), P. mirabilis (Fig. 3G), B. subtilis<br />

(Fig. 3H), E.coli 360 (Fig. 3J) and S.aureus (Fig. 3H). The glycated pea<br />

proteins were better energetic substrate than the non-glycated<br />

pea proteins, causing an increase of the metabolic activity of the<br />

higher number of immobilised bacteria; apart from bacteria given<br />

above and, additionally, E. faecalis (Fig. 3D) and S. saprophyticus<br />

(Fig. 3I). Moreover, the glycated pea proteins (G) were preferably<br />

used as the energy source rather than the non-glycated ones<br />

(N) (Fig. 3A–D, H and I), displaying statistical differences when<br />

compared to the control culture (C) and the culture supplemented<br />

with the non-glycated pea proteins (N). The metabolic activity of<br />

the Gram-positive cocci E. faecium (Fig. 3E) and S. saprophyticus<br />

(Fig. 3I) was decreased by the supplementation of the cultures<br />

with the non-glycated pea proteins (N). In addition, the nonglycated<br />

pea proteins (N) initially decreased the metabolic activity<br />

of the immobilised E. coli 22 (Fig. 3A) but eventually did not<br />

demonstrate any statistical differences when compared to the<br />

control culture (C) at the final stage of the cultivation period.<br />

Moreover, there were no statistical differences in the metabolic<br />

activity of E. faecalis culture supplemented with the non-glycated<br />

peaproteins(N) whencomparedtothecontrolculture(C) (Fig. 3D).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

It has already been demonstrated that substances delivered<br />

with food have an influence on intestinal homeostasis, and in<br />

consequence also on the general health status of the whole human<br />

organism. 20–22 Therefore, glycated food proteins, which display<br />

prolonged biological activities, may potentially be important<br />

modulators of the structure and function of intestinal flora as are<br />

other food substances. Limited information on that issue entails<br />

the creation of simplified model systems in order to scrutinise<br />

the scope of interactions that glycated proteins may have with<br />

bacterial representatives of the intestinal ecosystem.<br />

The bacterial intestinal ecosystem is highly complex and uses<br />

various available niches. The intestinal environment imposes<br />

different states of bacterial life, including microorganisms freely<br />

swimming in the intestinal contents as well as microbes<br />

immobilised to the solid surfaces, creating a biofilm. This study<br />

used various experimental models with both free-swimming<br />

bacteria, as well as bacteria immobilised to the solid surfaces, to<br />

establish the impact of non-glycated and glycated pea proteins on<br />

the physiological activity of the referential bacteria. The influence<br />

of the examined substrates on the proliferation rate of the analysed<br />

bacteria was assessed with the DAPI fluorescent marker (Fig. 1).<br />

The bifunctional, stimulatory and inhibitory role of non-glycated<br />

pea proteins was demonstrated in this study. The non-glycated<br />

pea proteins stimulated the proliferation activity of the most of<br />

the bacteria examined (Fig. 1B, D, F–H, J, K), which implies their<br />

use as energy sources as well as potential nutrients. The inhibitory<br />

effect of the non-glycated pea proteins was noticed for E. coli<br />

22 (Fig. 1A), E. faecium (Fig. 1E), S. saprophyticus at the final stage<br />

of the cultivation (Fig. 1I) and L. acidophilus at the initial phase<br />

of the cultivation (Fig. 1C). Since the DAPI fluorescent marker<br />

stains both dead and living bacterial cells, the observed decrease<br />

in the bacterial number must have been caused by lysis of the<br />

microorganisms. This suggests the occurrence of strong inhibitory<br />

sequences in the non-glycated pea proteins, influencing E. coli 22<br />

and E. faecium. The peptides displaying an antibacterial mode of<br />

action, achieved by enzymatic degradation, were a probable cause<br />

of the decrease of the number of S. saprophyticus. Interestingly,<br />

bacteria from the genus Lactobacillus demonstrated adaptive<br />

abilities, probably synthesising enzymes capable of utilising<br />

peptides and/or protein inhibitory structures, thus increasing their<br />

proliferation activities. Glycation of pea proteins with glucose<br />

suppressed their inhibitory properties. The glucose condensed<br />

onto the pea proteins and not only changed their structure,<br />

thus suppressing their inhibitory action, but also constituted an<br />

additional source of energy. In addition, glycation of the pea<br />

increased their bacterial stimulatory effect in comparison to the<br />

non-glycated proteins (Fig. 1B–D, F–H, and I). The results obtained<br />

suggest an increased attractiveness of glycated pea proteins as a<br />

source of nutrients and energy. Similar observations were made in<br />

the case of potato proteins, indicating their preferential utilisation<br />

as nutrients and an energy source by E. faecalis. 23 However,<br />

glycation of pea proteins may also decrease their stimulatory<br />

effect as shown in the case of E. coli 360 (Fig. 1J) and S. aureus<br />

(Fig. 1K). Such results imply that the susceptibility to enzymatic<br />

degradation is lowered due to the glycation process. Although<br />

the general tendency in the bacterial response to glycated pea<br />

proteins indicates their stimulatory impact, the observed effects<br />

were likely to be strongly dependent on the enzymatic apparatus<br />

of particular microorganisms and their adaptive abilities. This is<br />

confirmedbythedifferentreactionstotheglycatedpeaproteinsby<br />

bacteria belonging to the same genera: Escherichia, Enterococcus<br />

and Staphylococcus. The published scientific data mainly indicate<br />

the antibacterial effect of glycated proteins on bacteria. 23–25<br />

The inhibitory impact of amino acids glycated with D-glucose,<br />

tryptophan and lysine, on the proliferation rate of Aeropyrum<br />

pernix was demonstrated by measuring the optical density of the<br />

culture. 26<br />

The condition of the bacterial culture is determined not only by<br />

its proliferation rate but also by the rate of its dying out. Death<br />

of a bacterial cell is indicated by a disturbance of the envelope<br />

structures. 27 Dead bacteria with damaged membranes may be<br />

detected with the complex of the Live/Dead fluorescent markers<br />

until the time of its lysis. 27 So called ‘ghost cells’, which retain<br />

their cellular envelopes but have lost their nucleoids, may also be<br />

present in bacterial cultures. 28 Both non-glycated and glycated<br />

pea proteins decreased dying out of Gram-positive bacteria in<br />

comparison to the control cultures (Fig. 2C–E, H, I and K). Glycated<br />

pea proteins more strongly stimulated the proliferation rate of<br />

the Gram-positive bacteria and their survival, which suggests a<br />

protective function of the modified proteins. These glycoproteins<br />

might have functioned as a potential storage material, thus making<br />

it possible for the culture to be maintained at the phase of<br />

the constant proliferation with a low percentage of dead cells<br />

(Fig. 2C, H and I) or might have covered the surfaces of the<br />

bacterial cells, thus forming thus a specific layer protecting them<br />

from a deleterious environmental impact. The high percentage<br />

of dead bacterial cells at the initial days of the cultivation of<br />

E. faecium with the non-glycated pea proteins (Fig. 2E) confirmed<br />

the occurrence of the inhibitory sequences encrypted in the pea<br />

proteins and/or the release of peptides displaying the antibacterial<br />

impact on the bacterial cellular envelopes. The later increase of<br />

the total number of these bacteria correlated with the decrease<br />

of the percentage of the dead bacterial cells and implies the<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1843


1844<br />

synthesis of enzymes utilising the deleterious substances. The<br />

survival rate of the Gram-negative bacteria was not significantly<br />

modified by the non-glycated pea proteins in the final stage of<br />

the cultivation of bacteria from the genera Escherichia (Fig. 2A<br />

and J) and Proteus (Fig. 2G). However, a high percentage of dead<br />

bacterial cells observed during the initial days of the culture of E.<br />

coli 22 (Fig. 2A), when compared to the control culture, confirms<br />

the inhibitory action of the non-glycated pea proteins. The high<br />

proliferation activity and the lowered percentage of dead bacterial<br />

cells, in comparison to the control culture, as well as to the one<br />

supplemented with the non-glycated pea proteins, in the cultures<br />

of E. aerogenes (Fig. 2B), P. mirabilis (Fig. 2G) and P. aeruginosa<br />

(Fig. 2F) indicate the use of the glycated pea proteins as attractive<br />

nutrients during the starvation period. Although an increase of<br />

the percentage of the dead cells in the bacterial culture from the<br />

genus Escherichia was observed (Fig. 2A and J), it was statistically<br />

insignificant when compared to the control culture as well as<br />

to the culture supplemented with non-glycated pea proteins.<br />

This effect observed in the case of E. coli 360 was a probable<br />

result of the dying out of the culture due to a utilisation of<br />

available nutrients and accumulation of deleterious metabolites.<br />

The intensity of the proliferation and the increasing percentage of<br />

the dead cells in the case of E. coli 22 may suggest a short time<br />

of generation, which may result from the destruction of bacterial<br />

cellular envelopes. There is a lack of publications concerning the<br />

effect of glycated proteins on the survival of bacteria, particularly<br />

in the context of the percentage of dead bacterial cells in bacterial<br />

cultures. Adamberg et al. 29 demonstrated the inhibitory effect of<br />

glycated whey proteins and their hydrolysates on the survival<br />

of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and S. aureus. Those authors suggested<br />

a formation of antibacterial peptide sequences displaying the<br />

inhibitory activities due to the glycation process.<br />

Ninety-nine per cent of bacteria living in natural environments<br />

are believed to form biofilms, 30 which equips them with the<br />

properties and metabolic activities that differ from those of freeswimming<br />

bacteria. 31,32 For that reason, simplified experimental<br />

models using bacteria immobilised to the filters were used in this<br />

study in order to determine the effect of the examined substrates<br />

on their activity. Microscopic analysis indicated formations of<br />

agglomerations constituting the proliferating bacteria, which, as<br />

time progressed, changed into multilayered conglomerates, which<br />

implies the formation of a biofilm. These observations remain<br />

consistent with the findings stating that once immobilised bacteria<br />

in the environment rich in the nutrients start to proliferate, they<br />

dynamically create the so-called ‘conditioning layer’ as soon as<br />

15 min after detecting the nutrients. 33 Moreover, rapid formation<br />

of the biofilm was also reported by Dunne, 34 who noticed that<br />

genes responsible for the formation of the polysaccharide matrix<br />

in P. aeruginosa were active 15 min after bacterial immobilisation<br />

to a solid surface.<br />

Bacterial monobiofilms were used to determine the impact of<br />

the non-glycated and glycated pea proteins on the metabolic<br />

activity of particular bacteria (Fig. 3). The glycated pea proteins<br />

stimulated dehydrogenase activity of all the bacterial cultures<br />

analysed, having a stronger stimulatory effect in comparison<br />

to the non-glycated pea proteins (Fig. 3A–D, H and I). The<br />

results obtained are consistent with the tendency observed<br />

in this study with free-swimming bacteria, as well as confirm<br />

the thesis of the attractiveness of glycated pea proteins in<br />

terms of metabolic activity. Since the contents of the CTC<br />

formazan formed is correlated with the number of the bacteria<br />

with active dehydrogenases (CTC+), the increase of metabolic<br />

www.soci.org D ´Swia¸tecka, H Kostyra, A ´Swia¸tecki<br />

activity approximately demonstrates the increase of the number<br />

of bacteria forming biofilms, also. However, the decrease of<br />

metabolic activity noticed in the final stage of the experiment<br />

is not tantamount to a decrease of the number of bacteria forming<br />

the biofilm, but indicates a hindrance to the metabolic processes.<br />

Such phenomena noticed in the case of the biofilm created by<br />

P. aeruginosa (Fig. 3F) may suggest a partial use of glycoproteins<br />

as energy sources. The non-glycated pea proteins were better<br />

sources of energy for E. coli 360 (Fig. 3J) and S. aureus (Fig. 3K),<br />

which once again suggests that the condensation of glucose onto<br />

pea proteins impedes their utilisation by the bacteria mentioned.<br />

The inhibitory effect of non-glycated pea proteins on E. coli 22<br />

(Fig. 3A), E. faecium (Fig. 3E) and S. saprophyticus (Fig. 3I) was also<br />

confirmed. The mentioned inhibitory action on the Gram-positive<br />

cocci might have been initially suppressed by the protective<br />

function of the biofilm. The inhibitory molecules might have been<br />

bounded by elements of the polysaccharide matrix formed or by<br />

the outer layer of bacterial cells forming the biofilm. Therefore,<br />

utilisation of the harmless protein fractions as well as the presence<br />

of substances displaying inhibitory activities might have been the<br />

cause of the later decrease in metabolic activities of the biofilms<br />

mentioned. The low metabolic activity of the immobilised E. coli<br />

22 (Fig. 3A) at the initial time of cultivation might also result from<br />

the action of inhibitory protein fractions. The fractions might have<br />

subsequently been immobilised to the matrix of the biofilm or<br />

deactivated and utilised by enzymes synthesised as a result of<br />

the adaptive bacterial response. The lack of any published data<br />

on that issue makes the explanation of the observed phenomena<br />

very difficult.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Theresultsobtainedprovedthattheglycationprocesssignificantly<br />

alters not only the structure of pea proteins examined but also<br />

their biological characteristics, making them active modulators of<br />

bacterial physiological activity. Glycated pea proteins influence the<br />

physiological activity of bacteria by stimulating the proliferation<br />

rate and metabolic activity of free-swimming and immobilised<br />

bacteria. They also decrease the percentage of dead bacterial<br />

cells in cultures of Gram-positive cocci. The results obtained are<br />

of great importance in terms of understanding the interaction of<br />

glycated food products and the intestinal ecosystem, which, in<br />

turn, may alter the general nutritional approach. Investigations<br />

into the beneficial effects of glycated pea proteins on the human<br />

heterogeneous bacterial population are currently under way in<br />

order to broadly elucidate their impact on the human intestinal<br />

ecosystem.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Ofuya ZM and Akhidue V, The role of pulses in human nutrition: a<br />

review. J Appl Sci Environ Mgt 9:99–104 (2005).<br />

2 Singh S, Kundu SS, Negi AS and Singh PN, Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)<br />

legume grains as protein source in the ration of growing sheep.<br />

Small Ruminant Res 64:247–254 (2006).<br />

3 Adsule RN and Kadam SS, Proteins, in Handbook of World<br />

Food Legumes: Nutritional Chemistry, Processing Technology and<br />

Utilization, vol. II, ed. by Salunkhe DK and Kadam SS. CRC Press,<br />

Boca Raton, FL, pp. 75–97 (989).<br />

4 Alonso R, Grant G, Dewey P and Marzo F, Nutritional assessment<br />

in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (Pisum sativum L.).<br />

J Agric Food Chem 48:2286–2290 (2000).<br />

5 Hedley CL,Carbohydrates,inGrainLegumeSeeds.ImprovingNutritional<br />

Quality and Agronomic Characteristics. CABI Publishing, Wallingford<br />

(2001).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845


Impact of pea proteins on types of bacteria www.soci.org<br />

6 Schafer G, Schenk U, Ritzel U, Ramadori G and Leonhardt U,<br />

Comparison of the effects of dried peas with those of potatoes<br />

in mixed meals on postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations<br />

in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 78:99–103 (2003).<br />

7 Vidal-Valverde C, Frias J, Hernández A, Martín-Alvarez PJ, Sierra I<br />

and Rodríguez C, Assessment of nutritional compounds and<br />

antinutritional factors in pea (Pisum sativum) seeds. J Sci Food<br />

Agric 83:298–306 (2003).<br />

8 Ames JM, Application of the Maillard reaction in the food industry.<br />

Food Chem 62:431–439 (1998).<br />

9 Chuyen NV, Maillard reaction and food processing. Application<br />

aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol 434:213–235 (1998).<br />

10 Michalska A and Zieliński H, Produkty reakcji Maillarda w ˙zywno´sci.<br />

˙Zywno´sć Nauka Technologia Jako´sć 51:5–16 (2007).<br />

11 Nakamura S, Kobayashi K and Kato A, Role of positive charge of<br />

lysozyme in the excellent emulsifying properties of Maillardtype<br />

lysozyme–polysaccharide conjugate. J Agric Food Chem<br />

42:2688–2691 (1994).<br />

12 Morgan F,MolléD,HenryG,Vénien A,Léonil J,Peltre G,et al,Glycation<br />

of bovine β-lactoglobulin: effect on the protein structure. Int J Food<br />

Sci Technol 34:429–435 (1999).<br />

13 Sato R, Sawabe T, Kishimura H, Hayashi K and Saeki H, Preparation<br />

of neoglycoprotein from carp myofibrillar protein and alginate<br />

oligosaccharide: improved solubility in low ionic strength medium.<br />

J Agric Food Chem 48:17–21 (2000).<br />

14 Weiss W, Vogelmeier C and Görg A, Electrophoretic characterization<br />

of wheat grain allergens from different cultivars in bakers’ asthma.<br />

Electrophoresis 14:805–816 (1993).<br />

15 Porter KG and Feig YS, The use of DAPI for identifying and counting<br />

aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948 (1980).<br />

16 Boulos L, Prevost M, Barbeau B, Coallier J and Desjardins R,<br />

LIVE/DEAD® BacLight : application of a new rapid staining method<br />

for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water.<br />

JMicrobMeth37:77–86 (1999).<br />

17 Berman T, Kaplan B, Chava S, Viner Y, Sherr BF and Sherr EB,<br />

Metabolically active bacteria of Lake Kinneret. Aquat Microb Ecol<br />

23:213–224 (2001).<br />

18 Rodriguez GG, Phipps D, Ishiguro K and Ridgway HF, Use of a<br />

fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring<br />

bacteria. Appl Environ Microb 58:1801–1808 (1992).<br />

19 ´Swia¸teckaD and ´Swia¸tecka A, The use of fluorescent markers to<br />

estimate the metabolic activity of heterotrophic bacteria. Limnol<br />

Papers 113:165–172 (2005).<br />

20 Macfarlane GT and Cummings JH, Probiotics and prebiotics: can<br />

regulating the activities of intestinal bacteria benefit health? BMJ<br />

318:999–1003 (1999).<br />

21 Bird AR, Brown IL and Topping DL, Starches, resistant starches, the gut<br />

microflora and human health. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 1:25–37<br />

(2000).<br />

22 Macfarlane GT, Steed H and Macfarlane S, Bacterial metabolism<br />

and health-related effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and other<br />

prebiotics. J Appl Microbiol 104:305–344 (2008).<br />

23 ´Swia¸tecka D, Marciniak-Darmochwał K, Kostyra H and ´Swia¸tecka A,<br />

The influence of non-enzymatically glycosylated potato proteins<br />

on the survival and metabolic activity of chosen bacteria. Reprod<br />

Nutr Dev 46:59–60 (2006).<br />

24 Einarsson H, Snygg BG and Eriksson C, Inhibition of bacterial growth<br />

by Maillard reaction products. J Agric Food Chem 31:1043–1047<br />

(1983).<br />

25 Einarsson H, The effect of time, temperature, pH and reactants on<br />

the formation of antibacterial compound in the Maillard reaction.<br />

Lebens Wiss Technol 20:51–55 (1987).<br />

26 Kim KW and Lee SB, Inhibitory effect of Maillard reaction products<br />

on growth of the aerobic marine hyperthermophilic archeon<br />

Aeropyrum pernix. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4325–4328 (2003).<br />

27 Joux FandLebaron P,Useoffluorescentprobestoassessphysiological<br />

functions of bacteria at single-cell level. Microb Infect 2:1523–1535<br />

(2000).<br />

28 Zweifel UL and Hagström A, Total counts of marine bacteria include<br />

a large fraction of non-nucleoid-containing bacteria (ghosts). Appl<br />

Environ Microbiol 61:2180–2185 (1995).<br />

29 Adamberg K, Kostyra H, Kostyra E, ´Swia¸teckaA and ´Swia¸teckaD,<br />

Influence of non-enzymatic glycosylation of whey proteins and<br />

concentration of glucose on their hydrolysis by trypsin and growth<br />

and survival of selected bacteria. Milchwiss 60:422–426 (2005).<br />

30 Costerton JW, Cheng K-J, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel NC, Dosgupton<br />

M, et al, Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev<br />

Microbiol 41:435–441 (1987).<br />

31 Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Bumgarner RE, Parsek MR, Teitzel GM,<br />

Lory S, et al, Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.<br />

Nature 413:860–864 (2001).<br />

32 Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG and Costerton JW, Review. Biofilms<br />

as complex differentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol<br />

56:187–209 (2002).<br />

33 Stewart PS and Costerton JW, Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in<br />

biofilms. Lancet 358:135–138 (2001).<br />

34 Dunne Jr WM, Review. Bacterial adhesion: Seen any good biofilms<br />

lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15:155–166 (2002).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1837–1845 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1845


1846<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 18 October 2009 Revised: 13 March 2010 Accepted: 26 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 14 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4023<br />

Suppressive effects of extracts from the aerial<br />

part of Coriandrum sativum L. on LPS-induced<br />

inflammatory responses in murine RAW 264.7<br />

macrophages<br />

Trang-Tiau Wu, a,b† Chia-Wen Tsai, c† Hsien-Tsung Yao, c Chong-Kuei Lii, c<br />

Haw-Wen Chen, c Yu-Ling Wu, d Pei-Yin Chen d and Kai-Li Liu d,e∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Coriandrum sativum is used not only as a spice to aid flavour and taste values in food, but also as a folk<br />

medicine in many countries. Since little is known about the anti-inflammatory ability of the aerial parts (stem and leaf) of<br />

C. sativum, the present study investigated the effect of aerial parts of C. sativum on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW<br />

264.7 macrophages. We further explored the molecular mechanism underlying these pharmacological properties of C. sativum.<br />

RESULTS: Ethanolic extracts from both stem and leaf of C. sativum (CSEE) significantly decreased LPS-induced nitric oxide and<br />

prostaglandin E2 production as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, and pro-interleukin-1β expression.<br />

Moreover, LPS-induced IκB-α phosphorylation and nuclear p65 protein expression as well as nuclear factor-κB(NF-κB) nuclear<br />

protein–DNA binding affinity and reporter gene activity were dramatically inhibited by aerial parts of CSEE. Exogenous<br />

addition of CSEE stem and leaf significantly reduced LPS-induced expression of phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein<br />

kinases (MAPKs).<br />

CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that aerial parts of CSEE have a strong anti-inflammatory property which inhibits<br />

pro-inflammatory mediator expression by suppressing NF-κB activation and MAPK signal transduction pathway in LPS-induced<br />

macrophages.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: Coriandrum sativum; inflammation; lipopolysaccharides; mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages; NF-κB<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Macrophages, the major immune cells in the innate immune<br />

system, are essential for host defence and inflammation against<br />

intracellular parasitic bacteria, pathogenic protozoa and fungi by<br />

producing a variety of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, such<br />

as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2<br />

(PGE2). 1 IL-1β from cleavage of an inactive pro-IL-1β protein is<br />

yielded by stimulated leukocytes and is a fundamental contributor<br />

to local and systemic inflammatory responses. 2 Large amounts<br />

of NO and PGE2, produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase<br />

(iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), are described not only<br />

at inflammatory sites but also in process of carcinogenesis. 3–5<br />

Although inflammation plays an important role in the host<br />

defence system, inappropriate activation of macrophages results<br />

in an overproduction of the inflammatory mediators, which is<br />

involved in the pathologies of many chronic diseases of modern<br />

society, such as rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, diabetes and<br />

cancer. 5–7 Current clinical approaches to treatments of chronic<br />

inflammation involve the inhibition of pro-inflammatory mediator<br />

production and the suppression of mechanisms responsible for<br />

the initiation of inflammatory responses.<br />

Activation of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway plays a<br />

key role in the transcriptional regulation of pro-inflammatory<br />

response gene expression, including iNOS, COX-2, cytokines,<br />

chemokines, growth factors, cell adhesion molecules, and several<br />

acute phase proteins. 8 The transcription factor NF-κB existsin<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Kai-Li Liu, Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical<br />

University, NO. 110, Sec. 1, Chien-Kuo N. Rd., Taichung 40203, Taiwan.<br />

E-mail: kaililiu@csmu.edu.tw<br />

† Trang-Tiau Wu and Chia-Wen Tsai contributed equally to this work.<br />

a Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital,<br />

Taichung, Taiwan<br />

b School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan<br />

c Department of Nutrition, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan<br />

d Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, NO. 110, Sec. 1,<br />

Chien-Kuo N. Rd., Taichung 40203, Taiwan<br />

e Department of Dietitian, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung,<br />

Taiwan<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Effect of C. sativum on inflammatory responses in macrophages www.soci.org<br />

the cytoplasm of most eukaryotes by forming homodimers or<br />

heterodimers with proteins of the NF-κB family, including p65<br />

(RelA), p50/p105 (NF-κB1), p52/p100 (NF-κB2), RelB, and c-Rel.<br />

In unstimulated cells, NF-κB is sequestered in the cytoplasm by<br />

noncovalentlybinding to an inhibitor protein termed IκB(α, β or ε).<br />

Activation of NF-κB occurs in response to inflammatory cytokines,<br />

oxidative stress, ultraviolet irradiation, or bacterial endotoxins,<br />

which induce phosphorylation, ubiquitination and degradation<br />

of IκBα. ThentheactivatedNF-κB migrates into the nucleus and<br />

induces transcriptional expression of its target genes. Constitutive<br />

activation of the NF-κB pathway leads to persistent increases in the<br />

expression of pro-inflammatory mediators and exerts pathogenic<br />

effects on chronic inflammatory related diseases. Regulation and<br />

control of NF-κB activation may be a key molecular target for<br />

anti-inflammatory therapy. 8,9<br />

Spices are used not only to aid flavour, colour and nutritional<br />

values in food, but also to treat various physical problems in<br />

traditional medicines. 10 Coriandrum sativum, commonly known<br />

as coriander or Chinese parsley, belongs to the family Apiaceae,<br />

which is widely cultivated all over the world. The seeds and aerial<br />

parts (stem and leaf) of C. sativum are commonly used as spices<br />

in Middle Eastern, Mediterranean, Indian, Latin American, African,<br />

Southeast Asian and Taiwanese cuisines. Data from numerous<br />

researchers have shown the therapeutic values of the seeds and<br />

seed oil of C. sativum due to its hypoglycaemic, hypolipidaemic,<br />

hepatoprotective, antimutagenic, antihypertensive, antioxidant,<br />

anxiolytic, antimicrobial and post-coital antifertility activity. 11–19<br />

The aerial parts of C. sativum have antioxidant and free<br />

radical scavenging activities, suppressive activity on lead and<br />

mercury deposition and bactericidal and anti-adhesive effects on<br />

Helicobacter pylori. 20–23 Recent studies reported that C. sativum<br />

seed oil reduced UV-induced erythema test of human skin and<br />

leaves of C. sativum water extract decreased LPS-induced NO<br />

production and had scavenging effects on NO. 24,25 Based on<br />

previous studies of C. sativum presented herein, it is worth<br />

conducting a detailed investigation on the anti-inflammatory<br />

property of aerial parts of C. sativum. The objective of the<br />

present study is to assess the regulatory efficacy of aerial parts<br />

of C. sativum on LPS-induced inflammatory responses in RAW<br />

264.7 macrophages as well as to explore the possible molecular<br />

mechanism behind these actions.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Materials<br />

The mouse macrophage-like cell line RAW 264.7 was purchased<br />

from the Food Industry <strong>Research</strong> and Development Institute<br />

(Hsinchu, Taiwan), and fetal bovine serum was from Thermo<br />

Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). RPMI 1640 medium<br />

and media supplements for cell culture were obtained from<br />

Invitrogen Corporation (Carlsbad, CA, USA). LPS, ferulic acid, gallic<br />

acid, 4-hydroxycoumarin, hesperidin, luteolin, dihydroquercetin,<br />

quercetin and Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent were from Sigma<br />

Chemical Company (St Louis, MO, USA). The specific antibodies for<br />

iNOS, p65, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), and phosphorylated<br />

JNK were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz,<br />

CA,USA).Theantibodiesagainstp38,extracellularsignal-regulated<br />

kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), phosphorylated p38, ERK1/2 and IκB-α, as<br />

well as p65 were from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Beverly,<br />

MA, USA). The specific antibodies for COX-2, pro-IL-1β, andβactin<br />

were obtained form Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor,<br />

MI, USA), CytoLab Ltd. (Rehovot, Israel), and Sigma Chemical<br />

Company, respectively. Nucleotides and RNase inhibitor were<br />

obtained from Promega Co. (Madison, WI, USA) and M-MMLV<br />

reverse transcriptase was from Gibco BRL (Gaithersburg, MD).<br />

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and TaqMan®<br />

Universal PCR Master Mix were from Applied Biosystems (Foster<br />

City, CA, USA). The biotin-labelled and unlabelled double-stranded<br />

NF-κB consensus oligonucleotides and a mutant double-stranded<br />

NF-κB oligonucleotide for electrophoretic mobility shift assay<br />

(EMSA) were synthesised by MDBio Inc. (Taipei, Taiwan). The pNFkB-Luc<br />

plasmid was from Stratagene Inc. (La Jolla, CA, USA) and the<br />

Luciferase Assay System, β-Galactosidase Enzyme Assay System<br />

with Reporter Lysis Buffer, and pSV-β-galactosidase control vector<br />

were from Promega. All other chemicals were of the highest quality<br />

available.<br />

Preparation of extractions<br />

C. sativum was purchased from local markets at Taichung, Taiwan,<br />

and was identified by Dr Lee-Yan Sheen (Graduate Institute of<br />

Food Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei,<br />

Taiwan). A voucher specimen was kept in our laboratory, at<br />

the Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University,<br />

Taichung, Taiwan, for further reference.<br />

C. sativum was washed and its leaves and stems were separately<br />

cut into small pieces, placed in a −70 ◦ C freezer for 12 h and then<br />

freeze-dried (FD4; Heto Lab Equipment, Birkerød, Denmark) for at<br />

least 12 h. The dried C. sativum leaves and stems were ground to a<br />

fine power using an electric food grinder and were then stored at<br />

−20 ◦ Cforfurtheruse.<br />

The powdered freeze-dried food material was extracted by<br />

95% ethanol (25 mL g −1 powder) for 24 h and then centrifuged at<br />

3200 × g for 10 min. The supernatants were concentrated at 37 ◦ C<br />

under reduced pressure and then dissolved in ether. The ether in<br />

the ethanolic extract was evaporated by nitrogen. The ethanolic<br />

extracts were weighed to measure the extraction yield and then<br />

dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for cell treatments.<br />

Determination of total phenolics and flavonoids<br />

The amount of total phenolics in the leaf or stem of C. sativum<br />

ethanolic extract (CSEE) was measured according to a modification<br />

of the Folin–Ciocalteu method. 26 A 300 µL aliquot of each extract<br />

or standard solution was mixed with 300 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu<br />

reagent. The mixture was allowed to stand for 5 min followed by<br />

the addition of 600 µL of 20% Na2CO3. After a 10 min incubation<br />

at room temperature, the absorbance of the reaction mixture was<br />

measured at 730 nm and total phenolics were calibrated by using<br />

a standard curve of gallic acid. The total phenolic content of stem<br />

and leaf of CSEE was expressed as the gallic acid equivalent (GAE)<br />

in mg g −1 dry material.<br />

A 250 µL aliquot of each extract or standard solution was mixed<br />

with 1.25 mL of distilled water and 75 µL of5%NaNO2 solution.<br />

After 6 min, 150 µL of 10% AlCl3-H2O solution was added. After<br />

5 min, 0.5 mL of 1 mol L −1 NaOH solution was added and the<br />

total volume was brought up to 2.5 mL with ddH2O. Following<br />

thorough mixing of the solution, absorbance against the blank was<br />

determined at 510 nm and the total flavonoids were calibrated by<br />

a standard curve of quercetin. The total flavonoid content of the<br />

stem and leaf of CSEE was expressed as the quercetin equivalent<br />

(QE) in mg g −1 dry material. 27<br />

Cell culture<br />

The RAW 264.7 macrophages of passages 10 to 15 were<br />

maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 2 mmol L −1<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1847


1848<br />

L-glutamine,100UmL −1 penicillin,100 µgmL −1 streptomycin,and<br />

10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum at 37 ◦ Cinahumidified<br />

atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were plated at a density of 8 × 10 5<br />

per 30 mm culture dish and were incubated until 90% confluence<br />

was reached.<br />

Cells were treated with 25–150 µgmL −1 leaf or stem of CSEE in<br />

the presence of 1 µgmL −1 LPS for 8–24 h as indicated or treated<br />

with the leaf or stem of CSEE for 1 h or 14 h prior to addition of LPS<br />

(1 µgmL −1 ). The final DMSO concentration in the medium was<br />

0.1%.<br />

Cell viability assay<br />

The mitochondrial-dependent reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide(MTT)toformazan<br />

was used to measure cell respiration as an indicator of cell<br />

viability. 28 After incubation with leaf or stem of CSEE with or without<br />

LPS for 24 h, cells were incubated in RPMI medium containing<br />

0.5 mg mL −1 MTT for an additional 3 h. The medium was then removed<br />

and isopropanol was added to dissolve the formazan. After<br />

centrifugation at 5000 × g for 5 min, 100 µL of supernatant from<br />

each sample was transferred to 96-well plates, and the absorbance<br />

was read at 570 nm in a VersaMaxTM Tunable Microplate Reader<br />

(Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).<br />

Nitrite and PGE2 determination<br />

The nitrite in the medium was measured by use of the<br />

Griess assay and used as an indicator of NO synthesis in<br />

cells. 29 Briefly, equal volumes of the culture supernatants and<br />

Griess solution [1 : 1 mixture of 1% sulfanilamide and 0.1% N-<br />

(naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in 5% H3PO4] were<br />

added to 96-well plates at room temperature for 10 min.<br />

Absorbance was measured at 550 nm and nitrite concentration<br />

was determined by using a standard curve of sodium nitrite<br />

prepared in the culture medium.<br />

Cells were treated with leaf or stem of CSEE in the presence<br />

of LPS for 12 h. The diluted culture supernatants were used to<br />

quantify PGE2 by use of an enzyme immunoassay kit (Cayman<br />

Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the protocol<br />

provided by the manufacturer.<br />

Western blot analysis<br />

Cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)<br />

and were harvested in 150 µL lysis buffer containing 10 mmol L −1<br />

Tris-HCl, 5 mmol L −1 EDTA, 0.2 mmol L −1 phenylmethylsulfonyl<br />

fluoride (PMSF), and 20 µgmL −1 aprotinin, pH 7.4. The protein<br />

contentineachsamplewasquantifiedbyuseoftheCoomassiePlus<br />

Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL, USA).<br />

Equal amounts of proteins were denatured and separated on SDSpolyacrylamide<br />

gels and were then transferred to polyvinylidene<br />

difluoride membranes (NewTM Life Science Product, Inc., Boston,<br />

MA, USA). Nonspecific binding sites on the membranes were<br />

blockedwith5%nonfatdrymilkinabuffercontaining10 mmol L −1<br />

Tris-HCl and 100 mmol L −1 NaCl, pH 7.5, at 4 ◦ C overnight. The<br />

blots were then incubated sequentially with primary antibody and<br />

horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat or anti-rabbit IgG<br />

(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Immunoreactive protein bands were<br />

developed by enhanced chemiluminescence kits (Amersham Life<br />

Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL, USA) and then were quantified<br />

through densitometric analysis by Zero-Dscan (Scanalytics Inc.,<br />

Fairfax, VA, USA).<br />

www.soci.org T-T Wu et al.<br />

Isolation of RNA and real-time quantitative reverse<br />

transcriptase-PCR<br />

Total RNA was isolated from cells by using Tri-Reagent TM (Molecular<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Center Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) as described by the<br />

manufacturer and RNA extracts were suspended in nuclease-free<br />

water. Total RNA (0.1–0.25 µg) was reverse transcribed with M-<br />

MMLV reverse transcriptase in a 20 µL final volume of the reaction<br />

buffer consisting of 1 mmol L −1 of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate,<br />

2.5 units RNase inhibitor and 2.5 m mol L −1 oligo(dT)16.<br />

For the synthesis of complementary DNA, reaction mixtures were<br />

incubated for 15 min at 45 ◦ C and stopped by denaturing the<br />

reverse transcriptase at 99 ◦ C for 5 min. Complementary DNA was<br />

amplified with TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix primers and<br />

probes and the reactions were measured in ABI 7000 Real Time PCR<br />

System (Applied Biosystems). The primers and probes were obtained<br />

from Applied Biosystems: iNOS (Mm00440502 m1), COX-2<br />

(Mm00478374 m1),IL-1β (Mm01336189 m1)andglyceraldehyde-<br />

3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, Mm00484668 m1). Glyceraldehyde<br />

3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an<br />

internal standard gene and the threshold cycles (Ct) of a test<br />

sample to a control sample (��Ct method) was used for relative<br />

quantification of target gene expressions. 30<br />

Preparation of nuclear protein and EMSA<br />

At the time of harvest, cells were scraped with cold PBS<br />

and centrifuged. The pellets were resuspended in the hypotonic<br />

extraction buffer (10 mmol L −1 HEPES, 10 mmol L −1 KCl,<br />

1 mmol L −1 MgCl2, 1 mmol L −1 EDTA, 0.5 mmol L −1 dithiothreitol,<br />

0.2 mmol L −1 PMSF, 4 µgmL −1 leupeptin, 20 µgmL −1 aprotinin,<br />

and 0.5% NP-40) for 15 min on ice and were then centrifuged at<br />

6000×g for 15 min. The pelleted nuclei were resuspended in 50 µL<br />

hypertonic extraction buffer (10 mmol L −1 HEPES, 400 mmol L −1<br />

KCl, 1 mmol L −1 MgCl2, 1 mmol L −1 EDTA, 0.5 mmol L −1 dithiothreitol,<br />

0.2 mmol L −1 PMSF, 4 µgmL −1 leupeptin, 20 µgmL −1<br />

aprotinin, and 10% glycerol), were constantly shaken at 4 ◦ Cfor<br />

30 min, and were then centrifuged at 10 000 × g for 15 min. The<br />

resultant supernatants containing nuclear proteins were collected<br />

and stored at −70 ◦ C until the EMSA was performed.<br />

EMSA was performed according to our previous study. 31 The<br />

LightShiftTM Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit from Pierce Chemical<br />

Co. and synthetic biotin-labelled double-stranded NF-κBconsensus<br />

oligonucleotide (5 ′ -AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3 ′ ) were<br />

used to measure the effect of the CSEE leaf or stem on NFκB<br />

nuclear protein-DNA binding activity. Nuclear proteins (2 µg),<br />

poly(dI-dC), and biotin-labelled double-stranded NF-κB oligonucleotide<br />

were mixed with the binding buffer to a final volume<br />

of 20 µL and were incubated at room temperature for 30 min.<br />

In addition, the excess amount (100-fold molar excess) of unlabelled<br />

and a mutant double-stranded NF-κB oligonucleotide<br />

(5 ′ -AGTTGAGGCGACTTTCCCAGGC-3 ′ ) were used for the competition<br />

assay to confirm specificity of binding. The nuclear<br />

protein–DNA complex was separated by electrophoresis on a<br />

6% Tris/boric acid/EDTA–polyacrylamide gel and was then electrotransferred<br />

to a nylon membrane (HybondTM-N+, Amersham<br />

Pharmacia Biotech Inc, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The membrane was<br />

treated with streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase, and the nuclear<br />

protein–DNA bands were developed by using a SuperSignal West<br />

Pico kit (Pierce Chemical Co.).<br />

Reporter gene assay<br />

Reporter enzyme activity was evaluated by a cell-based analysis<br />

method for assaying NF-κB activity. The pNF-κB-Luc reporter<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854


Effect of C. sativum on inflammatory responses in macrophages www.soci.org<br />

Figure 1. Effects of stem and leaf of CSEE on LPS-induced iNO, COX-2 and<br />

Pro-IL-1β protein expressions in RAW 264.7 macrophages. (A) iNOS protein<br />

expression was measured by RAW 264.7 macrophages treated with or<br />

without LPS (10 ng mL −1 ) plus DMSO vehicle control and 25–150 µgmL −1<br />

stem or leaf of CSEE for 24 h. (B) COX-2 and (C) Pro-IL-1β protein expression<br />

were measured in cells preincubated with 25–150 µgmL −1 stem or leaf<br />

of CSEE for 1 h and then treated with either DMSO vehicle control or<br />

10 ng mL −1 LPSfor6h.Dataarethemean± SD of at least four separate<br />

experiments and are expressed as the percentage of the culture treated<br />

with LPS alone. Values not sharing the same letter are significantly different<br />

(P < 0.05).<br />

plasmid contains five tandem copies of the NF-κB consensus<br />

sequences, and it permits luciferase expression in response to NFκB<br />

activity. When RAW264.7 cells reached confluence, transient<br />

transfection of the reporter plasmid and the pSV-β-galactosidase<br />

control vector was performed using the Lipofectamine transfection<br />

reagent for 6 h. Cells were then placed in fresh culture<br />

media for 18 h before treating with DMSO vehicle control, or<br />

LPS plus stem or leaf of CSEE for 8 h. Supernatants of the cell<br />

lysates were applied to measure the luciferase and β-galactosidase<br />

activities by the Luciferase Assay System and β-Galactosidase Enzyme<br />

Assay System with Reporter Lysis Buffer from Promega Co.,<br />

respectively.<br />

Figure 2. Effects of stem and leaf of CSEE on LPS-induced of expressions<br />

of cytoplasmic phosphorylated IκBα and nuclear p65. RAW 264.7<br />

macrophages were preincubated with 150 µgmL −1 stem or leaf of CSEE for<br />

14 h and then treated with either DMSO vehicle control or 10 ng mL −1 LPS<br />

for 30 min. Western blot analysis was used to measure the protein content<br />

of phosphorylated IκB-α in the cytosolic factions and to measure p65<br />

protein content in the nuclearprotein fractions of RAW 264.7 macrophages.<br />

Data are the mean ± SD of at least four separate experiments and are<br />

expressed as the percentage of the culture treated with LPS alone. Values<br />

not having the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).<br />

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis<br />

The stem and leaf of CSEE were dissolved in DMSO, diluted with<br />

an appropriate volume of 50% methanol (in deionised water) and<br />

injected into the liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy (LC-<br />

MS) system. LC-MS was carried out with an Agilent 1100 Series<br />

LC System equipped with a UV detector (Agilent Technologies,<br />

Palo Alto, CA, USA). An Alltima C18 reverse-phase column<br />

(5 µm, 250 × 4.6 mm) was used. The mobile phase consisted<br />

of 10 mmol L −1 ammonium acetate containing 0.5% formic<br />

acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The flow rate was<br />

0.6 mL min −1 . The total running time was 90 min. The gradient<br />

system used was 5% B (0–10 min), 5% B to 40% B (10–40 min),<br />

40–55% B (40–55 min), 55% B to 80% B (55–65 min), 80–100% B<br />

(65–70 min), 100% B to 5% B (75–80 min), and 5% B (80–90 min).<br />

The column temperature was 25 ◦ C. The effluent was monitored<br />

using a UV detector set at 254 nm and a mass spectrometer<br />

operating in the negative ion mode over the m/z range 100 to<br />

700. Identification of constituents was carried out by LC-UV and<br />

LC-MS analyses by comparing their retention times, UV and mass<br />

spectra of the peaks with those of authentic standards based<br />

on the literature. 32 For quantitative analysis of rutin, calibration<br />

curves were constructed from working standard solutions of rutin<br />

at final concentrations of 1–1000 ng mL −1 and applied the same<br />

way for the stem and leaf of CSEE. Ions representing the [M-H] −<br />

species at m/z 609 were selected and the peak area was measured.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Data are expressed as the means ± SD from at least three<br />

independent experiments. Differences among treatments were<br />

analysed by ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple-range test by using the<br />

Statistical Analysis System (Cary, NC, USA). P values less than 0.05<br />

were considered to be significant.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The extraction yields of leaf and stem of CSEE were 11.76%<br />

and 11.97%, respectively. In addition, the phenolic contents,<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1849


1850<br />

Table 1. Effects of an ethanolic extract from the stem of Coriandrum<br />

sativum (CSEE) on the MTT assay and LPS-induced NO and PGE2<br />

production in RAW 264.7 macrophages<br />

Treatment ∗ MTT † NO PGE2<br />

Control 102.9 ± 2.0b ND 6.7 ± 0.2d LPS 100.0 ± 0.0b 100.0 ± 0.0a 100.0 ± 0.0a LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

25 µgmL−1 98.9 ± 4.6b 94.4 ± 4.6b 53.6 ± 8.9b LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

50 µgmL−1 100.3 ± 3.8b 60.0 ± 7.6c 43.2 ± 2.1b LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

100 µgmL−1 117.7 ± 7.9a 32.7 ± 7.5d 44.7 ± 9.7b LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

150 µgmL−1 110.6 ± 5.0a 19.7 ± 6.8e 25.2 ± 2.4c ∗ RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with or without LPS<br />

(10 ng mL −1 ) plus DMSO vehicle control and 25 to 150 µgmL −1<br />

stem of CSEE for 24 h (MTT assay and NO production) or for 12 h<br />

(PGE2 production).<br />

† Data are the mean ± SD of at least four separate experiments and are<br />

expressed as the percentage of the culture treated with LPS alone.<br />

a,b,c,d Means with different letters within the same column are<br />

significantly different (P < 0.05).<br />

Table 2. EffectsofleafofCSEEonMTTassayandLPS-inducedNO<br />

and PGE2 production in RAW 264.7 macrophages<br />

Treatment ∗ MTT † NO PGE2<br />

Control 102.9 ± 2.0b ND 6.7 ± 0.2d LPS 100.0 ± 0.0b 100.0 ± 0.0a 100.0 ± 0.0a LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

25 µgmL−1 90.9 ± 0.7c 82.8 ± 6.1a 96.6 ± 6.2a LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

50 µgmL−1 102.9 ± 6.6b 62.0 ± 7.2b 80.7 ± 2.6b LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

100 µgmL−1 93.1 ± 1.4c 46.9 ± 9.0c 82.8 ± 3.8b LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

150 µgmL−1 116.0 ± 3.2a 24.7 ± 7.8d 52.5 ± 7.7c ∗ RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with or without LPS<br />

(10 ng mL −1 ) plus DMSO vehicle control and 25 to 150 µgmL −1<br />

leaf of CSEE for 24 h (MTT assay and NO production) or for 12 h<br />

(PGE2 production).<br />

† Data are the mean ± SD of at least four separate experiments and are<br />

expressed as the percentage of the culture treated with LPS alone.<br />

a,b,c,d Means with different letters within the same column are<br />

significantly different (P < 0.05).<br />

expressed as GAE, of leaf and stem extracts were 15.5 ± 1.9 and<br />

17±3.8mgg −1 dryextract,respectively.Theamountofflavonoids,<br />

expressed as QE, of the leaf extract was 16.14 ± 1.17 mg g −1 dry<br />

extract which was 5.7 times higher than that of stem extract.<br />

At the test concentrations, cell viability of the LPS-activated cells<br />

treated with leaf or stem of CSEE was more than 90% of that of cells<br />

treated with LPS alone, as assessed by mitochondrial reduction of<br />

MTT after 18 h challenge (Tables 1 and 2).<br />

As shown in Tables 1 and 2, stimulation of macrophages with<br />

LPS resulted in a strong increase in NO and PGE2 production. A<br />

dose-dependent decrease in NO and PGE2 production was noted<br />

in cells treated with leaf or stem of CSEE in the presence of LPS. At<br />

a concentration of 150 µgmL −1 , 80% and 75% reduction in nitrite<br />

production were noted in cells treated with leaf and stem of CSEE,<br />

www.soci.org T-T Wu et al.<br />

Table 3. EffectsofstemofCSEEonLPS-inducediNO,COX-2,and<br />

IL-1β mRNA expressions in RAW 264.7 macrophages<br />

Treatment ∗ iNOS † COX-2 IL-1β<br />

Control 0.7 ± 0.7e 0.8 ± 0.7d 0.1 ± 0.2d LPS 100.0 ± 0.0a 100.0 ± 0.0a 100.0 ± 0.0a LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

25 µgmL−1 59.1 ± 6.7b 66.0 ± 4.7b 78.8 ± 8.8ab LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

50 µgmL−1 59.8 ± 5.1b 63.1 ± 9.0b 71.2 ± 6.4b LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

100 µgmL−1 42.1 ± 7.2c 54.6 ± 11.6c 51.2 ± 10.2c LPS + Stem of CSEE<br />

150 µgmL−1 28.0 ± 4.4d 45.3 ± 2.7c 47.8 ± 9.0c ∗ iNOS mRNA expression was measured by RAW 264.7 macrophages<br />

treated with or without LPS (10 ng mL −1 ) plus DMSO vehicle control<br />

and 25 to 150 µgmL −1 stem of CSEE for 8 h. COX-2 and IL-1β<br />

mRNA expression were measured in cells preincubated with 25 to<br />

150 µgmL −1 stem or leaf of CSEE for 1 h and then treated with either<br />

DMSO vehicle control or 10 ng mL −1 LPS for 6 h.<br />

† Data are the mean ± SD of at least four separate experiments and are<br />

expressed as the percentage of the culture treated with LPS alone.<br />

a,b,c,d Means with different letters within the same column are<br />

significantly different (P < 0.05).<br />

Table 4. EffectsofleafofCSEEonLPS-inducediNO,COX-2,andIL-1β<br />

mRNA expressions in RAW 264.7 macrophages<br />

Treatment ∗ iNOS † COX-2 IL-1β<br />

Control 0.7 ± 0.7e 0.8 ± 0.7e 0.1 ± 0.2d LPS 100.0 ± 0.0a 100.0 ± 0.0a 100.0 ± 0.0a LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

25 µgmL−1 79.5 ± 8.8b 47.8 ± 1.2b 94.5 ± 5.4a LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

50 µgmL−1 42.6 ± 6.2c 46.7 ± 4.1bc 71.1 ± 8.7b LPS + leaf of CSEE<br />

100 µgmL−1 23.1 ± 5.8d 26.6 ± 4.2cd 62.6 ± 17.0b LPS + Leaf of CSEE<br />

150 µgmL−1 14.1 ± 3.8d 21.6 ± 2.8d 42.0 ± 6.2c ∗ iNOS mRNA expression was measured by RAW 264.7 macrophages<br />

treated with or without LPS (10 ng mL −1 ) plus DMSO vehicle control<br />

and 25 to 150 µgmL −1 leaf of CSEE for 8 h. COX-2 and IL-1β<br />

mRNA expression were measured in cells preincubated with 25 to<br />

150 µgmL −1 stem or leaf of CSEE for 1 h and then treated with either<br />

DMSO vehicle control or 10 ng mL −1 LPS for 6 h.<br />

† Data are the mean ± SD of at least four separate experiments and are<br />

expressed as the percentage of the culture treated with LPS alone.<br />

a,b,c,d Means with different letters within the same column are<br />

significantly different (P < 0.05).<br />

respectively. The PGE2 levels in cells treated with 150 µgmL −1 of<br />

the leaf and stem of CSEE were 25.2 ± 2.4% and 52.5 ± 7.7%,<br />

respectively, of the level of cells treated with LPS alone.<br />

The immunoblot assay showed that the protein expression<br />

of iNOS, COX-2 and proIL-1β was undetectable in resting RAW<br />

264.7 macrophages and was highly induced in the presence of<br />

LPS. The addition of exogenous leaf or stem of CSEE significantly<br />

reduced LPS-induced protein expression of iNOS, COX-2 and pro-<br />

IL-1β (P < 0.05, Fig. 1). As noted for the changes in protein<br />

expression, real-time RT-PCR further showed that LPS-induced<br />

mRNA expression of iNOS, COX-2 and pro-IL-1β was significantly<br />

decreased by leaf and stem of CSEE (Tables 3 and 4).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854


Effect of C. sativum on inflammatory responses in macrophages www.soci.org<br />

Figure 3. Effects of stem and leaf of CSEE on LPS-induced of activation of<br />

MAPKs.RAW264.7 macrophages were preincubated with 25–150 µgmL −1<br />

stem or leaf of CSEE for 1 h and then treated with either DMSO vehicle<br />

control or 10 ng mL −1 LPS for 30 min. Cells were lysed and western<br />

blotting was performed with the antibodies for phosphorylated (A) ERK<br />

1/2, (B) p38 and (C) JNK and the cells were then reprobed with antibodies<br />

against the corresponding MAPKs. The ratios of immunointensity<br />

between the MAPKs and the phosphorylated MAPKs are shown and<br />

are expressed as the percentage of the culture treated with LPS<br />

alone. Data are the mean ± SD of at least four separate experiments<br />

and values not sharing the same letter are significantly different<br />

(P < 0.05).<br />

Figure 4. Effects of stem and leaf of CSEE on activation of NF-κB. (A) RAW<br />

264.7 macrophages were preincubated with 150 µgmL −1 stem or leaf<br />

of CSEE for 14 h and then treated with either DMSO vehicle control or<br />

10 ng mL −1 LPS for 30 min. EMSA experiments were carried out by using<br />

the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit from Pierce Chemical Co. The<br />

unlabelled double-stranded oligonucleotides of NF-κB and the unlabelled<br />

double-stranded mutant NF-κB oligonucleotide were added for the<br />

competition assay and specificity assay, respectively. Bands were detected<br />

by using streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase and were developed by<br />

using a SuperSignal West Pico kit from Pierce Chemical Co. (B) Cells were<br />

transiently transfected with pSV-β-galactosidase and pNF-κB-Luc reporter<br />

gene for6 h and cells were treated with eithervehicle control or10 ng mL −1<br />

LPS plus 150 µgmL −1 stem or leaf of CSEE for 8 h. Cells were harvested<br />

and the level of luciferase and β-galactosidase activity were measured by<br />

the Luciferase Assay System and β-Galactosidase Enzyme Assay System<br />

with Reporter Lysis Buffer from Promega Co., respectively. Data are the<br />

mean ± SD of at least three separate experiments and are expressed as<br />

the percentage of the culture treated with LPS alone. Values not having<br />

the same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).<br />

Upon LPS treatment, the amounts of cytoplasmic phosphorylated<br />

IκB-α protein and nuclear p65 protein were greatly<br />

increased compared with those of the control (Fig. 2). Addition of<br />

150 µgmL −1 leaf or stem of CSEE significantly abolished the level<br />

of LPS-induced protein expression of phosphorylated IκB-α and<br />

nuclear p65 (P < 0.05).<br />

To test whether the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)<br />

signalling pathway was involved in the anti-inflammatory property<br />

of C. sativum, we examined the effect of leaf and stem of CSEE<br />

on LPS-induced MAPK activation. LPS treatment resulted in strong<br />

increases in the amounts of phosphorylated ERK1/2, p38 and JNK-1<br />

expression (P < 0.05, Fig. 3). Addition of stem extracts significantly<br />

reduced LPS-induced phosphorylated JNK and p38. However,<br />

LPS-induced activation of ERK1/2 was diminished only by high<br />

doses of CSEE stem. Addition of high doses of leaf extracts<br />

significantly inhibited LPS-induced activation of MAPKs. The<br />

amount of the unphosphorylated form of MAPKs was not<br />

influenced by the LPS treatment or LPS plus stem or leaf of<br />

CSEE.<br />

EMSA experiments were used to evaluate the effect of C.sativum<br />

on activation of NF-κB. As shown in Fig. 4A, the nuclear extract<br />

from LPS-stimulated macrophages showed a marked increase in<br />

NF-κB nuclear protein DNA-binding activity compared with that<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1851


1852<br />

www.soci.org T-T Wu et al.<br />

Figure 5. The HPLC-UV (UV 254 nm) and selectively extracted ion (rutin: [M-H] − , m/z 609.0) chromatograms of CSEE of stem (A, B) and leaf (C, D). 1 and 2:<br />

unknown compounds; 3: rutin.<br />

in unstimulated macrophages. Pretreatment of cells with leaf or<br />

stem of CSEE suppressed the activation of NF-κB binding to its<br />

consensus DNA sequences. The specificity of the NF-κB nuclear<br />

protein–DNA binding was verified by competition assay with a<br />

50-fold excess of unlabelled NF-κB probe and unlabelled mutant<br />

NF-κBprobe.<br />

To investigate the transcriptional activity of NF-κB, the<br />

expression of reporter genes in cells transfected with pNF-κB-<br />

Luc and the internal control pSV-β-galactosidase were analysed.<br />

Consistent with the EMSA assay result, the expression of<br />

LPS-induced NF-κB-Luc activity was significantly inhibited in<br />

cultures treated with 150 µgmL −1 leaf or stem of CSEE (Fig. 4B,<br />

P < 0.05).<br />

LC-MS analysis of the testing samples and several authentic<br />

standards revealed that only rutin is identified in both the stem<br />

andleafofCSEE.Rutinshowedthe[M-H] − ion at m/z 609 and<br />

its retention time was 31.9 min. Based on the peak area of mass<br />

spectral peak, the rutin concentrations in stem and leaf extracts<br />

were 130.5 and 42.0 µgg −1 , respectively. Two unknown large UV<br />

peaks presented at 48.3 min ([M-H] − ion at m/z 253) and 52.6 min<br />

([M-H] − ion at m/z 221) were not identified (Fig. 5).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Numerous studies have focused on herbal remedies and botanicals<br />

because they offer much promise in health benefits and disease<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854


Effect of C. sativum on inflammatory responses in macrophages www.soci.org<br />

treatments without excessive side effects and cytotoxicity. 33 A<br />

wide variety of plant-derived products, especially spices, have<br />

shown an anti-inflammatory effect but only a few have been<br />

examined to determine the molecular mechanism of this inhibitory<br />

action. 34 In this study, we investigated the anti-inflammatory<br />

properties of aerial parts of CSEE and dissected the possible<br />

molecular mechanism of action of C. sativum. The data presented<br />

herein showed that both the leaf and stem of CSEE significantly<br />

decreased NO and PGE2 production. The inhibition of NO and<br />

PGE2 was due to the inhibition of iNOS and COX-2 expression<br />

respectively, at mRNA and protein levels as shown by real-time<br />

RT-PCR and western blot. Moreover, we demonstrated that the<br />

aerial part of CSEE suppressed iNOS, COX-2 and IL-1β expression,<br />

acting at the transcriptional level possibly via inhibition of the LPSinduced<br />

MAPK pathway and transcription factor NF-κB activation.<br />

Considerable interest in immunomodulation therapy is now<br />

focusedonblockingtheactivationofNF-κBinmacrophages,which<br />

resultsinsuppressingarangeofinflammatorymediatorexpression<br />

such as iNOS, COX-2 and IL-1β. 2,35,36 Our data clearly showed<br />

that CSEE effectively inhibited the NF-κB pathway by blocking<br />

LPS-induced IκB-α phosphorylation, nuclear p65 expression and<br />

subsequent DNA binding affinity and transcriptional activation.<br />

These results suggested that stem and leaf of CSEE decreased the<br />

expression of pro-inflammatory mediators via down-regulating<br />

the NF-κB pathway in stimulated macrophages.<br />

MAPKs, one of the most important intracellular signalling<br />

pathways, are a family of serine/threonine protein kinases, which<br />

include JNK, ERK and p38 kinase subgroups at least in mammalian<br />

cells. MAPK pathways are involved in a battery of cellular events,<br />

including cell proliferation and growth, cell differentiation, cell<br />

movement, cellular senescence and apoptosis. 37 Although the<br />

exact signal pathways of MAPKs are still unclear, LPS-induced<br />

phosphorylation and activation of MAPKs in macrophages lead<br />

to the production of pro-inflammatory mediators as a result of<br />

the activation of transcription factors including NF-κB. 38 In the<br />

present study, the aerial part of CSEE significantly decreased<br />

LPS-induced phosphorylation of the three MAPKs, which implies<br />

that the inflammatory signal transduction by the MAPK pathways<br />

could be impeded by C. sativum in LPS-induced macrophages.<br />

Numerous studies have demonstrated that phenolic compounds<br />

in spices contribute to the health benefits of spices. 39 A previous<br />

study indicated that luteolin, vicenin, ferulic acid and arbutin were<br />

the main components in the aerial part of CSEE. 32 However, in this<br />

study, only rutin was identified in the stem and leaf of CSEE and<br />

the rutin concentration in stem extracts (130.5 µgg −1 )washigher<br />

than that in the leaf extracts (42.0 µgg −1 ). It was interesting to<br />

note that the total amount of flavonoids in the stem extracts was<br />

also lower than that in the leaf extracts, although there was no<br />

significant difference in the amount of total phenolics between<br />

stem and leaf of CSEE. Furthermore, the amount of rutin in the<br />

IC50 values of the stem and leaf of CSEE against LPS-induced<br />

NO production in RAW264.7 macrophage was 8.2 µgmL −1 and<br />

2.7 µgmL −1 , much lower than the reported IC50 value of rutin<br />

on LPS-induced NO production (25.3 µgmL −1 ). 40 These results<br />

indicated that it is not only rutin which provides contributions<br />

to the anti-inflammatory properties of C. sativum, but other<br />

yet unknown compounds in the stem and leaf of CSEE may<br />

present further contributions as well. It is noteworthy that the<br />

antimutagenicity of C. sativum was dependent on the chlorophyll<br />

content in C. sativum juice. 14 Moreover, the chlorophyllin, a watersoluble<br />

derivative of chlorophyll, inhibited NO production and<br />

iNOS expression by modulating LPS-induced NF-κB activation in<br />

RAW264.7 macrophages. 41 Therefore, the amount of chlorophyll<br />

in CSEE is likely to play an important in its anti-inflammatory<br />

property.<br />

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that both the leaf and<br />

the stem of CSEE modulate LPS-induced inflammatory events in<br />

RAW 264.7 macrophages. This inhibitory activity of C. sativum, at<br />

least in part, occurs through C. sativum modulating the NF-κB<br />

activation and MAPK pathway. According to these experimental<br />

results supporting the anti-inflammatory property of the leaf and<br />

stem of CSEE, it would be worthwhile to explore the biomedical<br />

importance of the aerial parts of CSEE in the treatment and<br />

prevention of chronic inflammatory related diseases.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This research was funded by the National Science Council, Republic<br />

of China, under Grant NSC 96-2320-B-040-027-MY3.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Fujiwara N and Kobayashi K, Macrophages in inflammation. Curr Drug<br />

Targets Inflamm Allergy 4:281–286 (2005).<br />

2 Stylianou E and Saklatvala J, Interleukin-1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol<br />

30:1075–1079 (1998).<br />

3 Korhonen R, Lahti A, Kankaanranta H and Moilanen E, Nitric oxide<br />

productionandsignalingininflammation.CurrDrugTargetsInflamm<br />

Allergy 4:471–479 (2005).<br />

4 Park JY,Pillinger MH and Abramson SB,Prostaglandin E2 synthesis and<br />

secretion: the role of PGE2 synthases. Clin Immunol 119:229–240<br />

(2006).<br />

5 Kundu JK and Surh YJ, Inflammation: gearing the journey to cancer.<br />

Mutat Res 659:15–30 (2008).<br />

6 Manzi S and Wasko MC, Inflammation-mediated rheumatic diseases<br />

and atherosclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis 59:321–325 (2000).<br />

7 King GL, The role of inflammatory cytokines in diabetes and its<br />

complications. JPeriodontol79:1527–1534 (2008).<br />

8 Chen F, Castranova V, Shi X and Demers LM, New insights into the role<br />

of nuclear factor-kappaB, a ubiquitous transcription factor in the<br />

initiation of diseases. Clin Chem 45:7–17 (1999).<br />

9 Makarov SS, NF-kappaB as a therapeutic target in chronic<br />

inflammation: recent advances. Mol Med Today 6:441–448 (2000).<br />

10 Tapsell LC, Hemphill I, Cobiac L, Patch CS, Sullivan DR, Fenech M, et al,<br />

Health benefits of herbs and spices: the past, the present, the future.<br />

Med J 185:S4–S24 (2006).<br />

11 Gray AM and Flatt PR, Insulin-releasing and insulin-like activity of the<br />

traditional anti-diabetic plant Coriandrum sativum (coriander). Br<br />

JNutr81:203–209 (1999).<br />

12 Lal AA, Kumar T, Murthy PB and Pillai KS, Hypolipidemic effect of<br />

Coriandrum sativum L. in triton-induced hyperlipidemic rats. Indian<br />

JExpBiol42:909–912 (2004).<br />

13 Sreelatha S, Padma PR and Umadevi M, Protective effects of<br />

Coriandrum sativum extracts on carbon tetrachloride-induced<br />

hepatotoxicity in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 47:702–708 (2009).<br />

14 Cortes-Eslava J, Gomez-Arroyo S, Villalobos-Pietrini R and Espinosa-<br />

Aguirre JJ, Antimutagenicity of coriander (Coriandrum sativum)<br />

juiceonthemutagenesisproducedbyplantmetabolitesofaromatic<br />

amines. Toxicol Lett 153:283–292 (2004).<br />

15 Medhin DG, Hadhazy P, Bakos P and Verzar-Petri G, Hypotensive<br />

effects of Lupinus termis and Coriandrum sativum in anaesthetized<br />

rats. A preliminary study. Acta Pharm Hung 56:59–63 (1986).<br />

16 Bajpai M, Mishra A and Prakash D, Antioxidant and free radical<br />

scavenging activities of some leafy vegetables. Int J Food Sci Nutr<br />

56:473–481 (2005).<br />

17 Emamghoreishi M, Khasaki M and Aazam MF, Coriandrum sativum:<br />

evaluation of its anxiolytic effect in the elevated plus-maze.<br />

J Ethnopharmacol 96:365–370 (2005).<br />

18 KubobI,FujitaK,KuboA,NiheiKandOguraT,Antibacterialactivity<br />

of coriander volatile compounds against Salmonella choleraesuis.<br />

J Agric Food Chem 52:3329–3332 (2004).<br />

19 Al-Said MS, Al-Khamis KI, Islam MW, Parmar NS, Tariq M and Ageel AM,<br />

Post-coital antifertility activity of the seeds of Coriandrum sativum<br />

in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 21:165–173 (1987).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1853


1854<br />

20 Bajpai M, Mishra A and Prakash D, Antioxidant and free radical<br />

scavenging activities of some leafy vegetables. Int J Food Sci Nutr<br />

56:473–481 (2005).<br />

21 AgaM,IwakiK,UedaY,UshioS,MasakiN,FukudaS,et al, Preventive<br />

effect of Coriandrum sativum (Chinese parsley) on localized lead<br />

deposition in ICR mice. J Ethnopharmacol 77:203–208 (2001).<br />

22 Karunasagar D, Krishna MV, Rao SV and Arunachalam J, Removal and<br />

preconcentration of inorganic and methyl mercury from aqueous<br />

mediausingasorbentprepared from the plant Coriandrumsativum.<br />

J Hazard Mater 118:133–139 (2005).<br />

23 O’Mahony R, Al-Khtheeri H, Weerasekera D, Fernando N, Vaira D,<br />

Holton J, et al, Bactericidal and anti-adhesive properties of<br />

culinary and medicinal plants against Helicobacter pylori. World<br />

J Gastroenterol 11:7499–7507 (2005).<br />

24 Reuter J, Huyke C, Casetti F, Theek C, Frank U, Augustin M, et al, Antiinflammatory<br />

potential of a lipolotion containing corianderoil in the<br />

ultraviolet erythema test. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 6:847–851 (2008).<br />

25 Bor JY, Chen HY and Yen GC, Evaluation of antioxidant activity and<br />

inhibitory effect on nitric oxide production of some common<br />

vegetables. J Agric Food Chem 54:1680–1686 (2006).<br />

26 Nurmi K,Ossipov V,Haukioja EandPihlaja K,Variationoftotalphenolic<br />

content and individual low-molecular-weight phenolics in foliage<br />

of mountain birch trees (Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa). JChemEcol<br />

22:2023–2040 (1996).<br />

27 Jia Z, Tang M and Wu J, The determination of flavonoid contents in<br />

mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food<br />

Chem 64:555–559 (1999).<br />

28 Denizot F and Lang R, Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and<br />

survival. Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving<br />

improved sensitivity and reliability. J Immunol Methods 89:271–277<br />

(1986).<br />

29 Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS and<br />

Tannenbaum SR, Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [ 15 N]-nitrate in<br />

biological fluids. Anal Biochem 126:131–138 (1982).<br />

30 Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD, Analysis of relative gene expression data<br />

using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2[−Delta Delta C(T)]<br />

method. Methods 25:402–408 (2001).<br />

www.soci.org T-T Wu et al.<br />

31 Liu KL, Chen WC, Wang RY, Lei YP, Sheen LY and Lii CK, DATS reduces<br />

LPS-induced iNOS expression, NO production, oxidative stress and<br />

NF-κB activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Agric Food Chem<br />

54:3472–3478 (2006).<br />

32 Oganesyan ET, Nersesyan ZM and Parkhomenko AY, Chemical<br />

composition of the above-ground part of Coriandrum sativum.<br />

Pharm Chem J 41:149–153 (2007).<br />

33 Jachak SM and Saklani A, Challenges and opportunities in drug<br />

discovery from plant. Curr Sci 92:1251–1257 (2007).<br />

34 Aggarwal BB and Shishodia S, Suppression of the nuclear factorkappaB<br />

activation pathway by spice-derived phytochemicals:<br />

reasoning for seasoning. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1030:434–441 (2004).<br />

35 Appleby SB, Ristimaki A, Neilson K, Narko K and Hla T, Structure of the<br />

human cyclo-oxygenase-2 gene. Biochem J 302:723–727 (1994).<br />

36 Xie QW, Kashiwabara Y and Nathan C, Role of transcription factor<br />

NF-kappa B/Rel in induction of nitric oxide synthase. Biochem J<br />

269:4705–4708 (1994).<br />

37 Schramek H, MAP kinases: from intracellular signals to physiology and<br />

disease. News Physiol Sci 17:62–67 (2002).<br />

38 KimHG,YoonDH,LeeWH,HanSK,ShresthaB,KimCH,et al, Phellinus<br />

linteusinhibitsinflammatorymediatorsbysuppressingredox-based<br />

NF-kappaB and MAPKs activation in lipopolysaccharide-induced<br />

RAW 264.7 macrophage. J Ethnopharmacol 114:307–315 (2007).<br />

39 Surh Y, Molecular mechanisms of chemopreventive effects of selected<br />

dietary and medicinal phenolic substances. Mutat Res 428:305–327<br />

(1999).<br />

40 Chen YC, Shen SC, Lee WR, Hou WC, Yang LL and Lee TJ, Inhibition<br />

of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors and lipopolysaccharide induced<br />

inducible NOS and cyclooxygenase-2 gene expressions by rutin,<br />

quercetin, and quercetin pentaacetate in RAW 264.7 macrophages.<br />

J Cell Biochem 82:537–48 (2001).<br />

41 Cho KJ, Han SH, Kim BY, Hwang SG, Park KK, Yang KH, et al,<br />

Chlorophyllin suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric<br />

oxide production in RAW 264.7 cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol<br />

166:120–127 (2000).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1846–1854


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 1 February 2010 Revised: 27 April 2010 Accepted: 28 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 3 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4024<br />

Antioxidant activity of peptide fractions<br />

derived from cottonseed protein hydrolysate<br />

Dandan Gao, Yusheng Cao ∗ and Haixing Li<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Cottonseed protein is widely regarded as a potential source of nutrients for humans and animals, but it is mainly<br />

used as forage in China. In the present study, Neutrase was employed to hydrolyse cottonseed protein to produce a hydrolysate<br />

with antioxidant activity suitable for conversion to high-value products. The antioxidant potential of the cottonseed protein<br />

hydrolysate (CPH) and its fractions was investigated using different in vitro methods. Furthermore, the amino acid composition<br />

of the CPH fractions was determined to evaluate the relationship between antioxidant activity and amino acid composition.<br />

RESULTS: The CPH prepared using Neutrase was separated into four fractions (I, II, III and IV) by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25.<br />

All fractions were effective antioxidants, with fraction III (0.8–1.2 kDa) showing the strongest activity. The amino acid analysis<br />

showed that fraction III also had the highest total amino acid content (616.8 g kg −1 protein) and was rich in Phe, His, Pro, Met,<br />

Ile and Cys compared with the other fractions.<br />

CONCLUSION: The results showed that the hydrolysate derived from cottonseed protein, particularly fraction III, could be a<br />

natural antioxidant source suitable for use as a food additive.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: cottonseed protein hydrolysate; peptide fractions; free radicals; antioxidant activity; amino acid composition<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Free radicals are constantly generated in the body tissues as a<br />

result of oxidative metabolism. There is much evidence that free<br />

radicals play a critical role in a variety of pathological conditions,<br />

including the processes of aging, cancer, multiple sclerosis,<br />

inflammation, coronary heart and cardiovascular diseases, senile<br />

dementia, arthritis and atheroscelerosis. 1 Free radicals are also<br />

of great concern in the food industry, since the oxidation of<br />

fats and oils is one of the major causes of the deterioration<br />

of the quality of lipid-containing foods during processing and<br />

storage. In order to provide protection against serious diseases<br />

and to prevent foods from undergoing deterioration, many<br />

chemicals with strong antioxidant activity are used as additives,<br />

such as butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene and<br />

n-propyl gallate. However, their use in foodstuffs is restricted<br />

or prohibited in some countries because of the potential risks<br />

of artificial antioxidants in vivo. Therefore there is a growing<br />

interest in identifying antioxidant properties in natural sources,<br />

including some dietary protein compounds. Recently, protein<br />

hydrolysates from different sources such as soybean, silver carp,<br />

wheat gluten, whey and rapeseed have been found to possess<br />

antioxidant activity. 2–6 The peptides from natural proteins with<br />

various activities have become a topic of great interest for the<br />

pharmaceutical, health food and preservation industries.<br />

Cotton is not only the most important fibre crop in the world<br />

but also the second best potential source for plant proteins after<br />

soybean. Cottonseed protein is widely regarded as a potential<br />

source of nutrients for human and animals and has been the<br />

subject of numerous investigations. 7 In China, about 10 million<br />

tons of cottonseed is produced annually. The presence of toxic<br />

gossypol in the cottonseed meal is a limiting factor for human<br />

consumption, and various methods have been proposed for<br />

reduction of the free gossypol content to the allowable limit<br />

of 0.45 g kg −1 (FDA regulations, 1974). The preparation method<br />

and foaming and emulsifying properties of cottonseed protein<br />

isolate (CPI) have been studied. However, to our knowledge, there<br />

have been no reports on the antioxidant activity of cottonseed<br />

protein hydrolysate (CPH). In the present study, CPH was prepared<br />

by enzymatic hydrolysis and separated into four fractions by<br />

gel filtration on Sephadex G-25. The antioxidant potential of<br />

the 4 h CPH and its fractions was investigated by measuring<br />

their inhibitory effect on the autoxidation of linoleic acid and<br />

their scavenging ability on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, hydroxyl<br />

radical and superoxide radical. Furthermore, the amino acid<br />

composition of the CPH fractions was determined to evaluate<br />

the relationship between antioxidant activity and amino acid<br />

composition.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Materials<br />

Non-toxic cottonseed meal (650 g kg −1 protein) was obtained<br />

from China Cotton-Unis Co. (Beijing, China). Neutrase was obtained<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Yusheng Cao, State Key Laboratory of Food Science<br />

and Technology, Sino-German Joint <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Nanchang University,<br />

Nanchang 330047, China. E-mail: yyssccc@hotmail.com<br />

State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Sino-German Joint<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1855–1860 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1855


1856<br />

from Novozymes A/S (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark).<br />

Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl<br />

(DPPH), linoleic acid, 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA), bovine serum<br />

albumin (BSA), lysozyme, insulin from bovine pancreas, vitamin<br />

B12,oxidisedglutathioneandreducedglutathionewerepurchased<br />

from Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). All other reagents<br />

used were of analytical grade.<br />

Production of CPI<br />

CPI was prepared according to the method of Tunc and Duman 8<br />

with slight modification. Defatted non-toxic cottonseed flour was<br />

mixed with NaOH solution (pH 10.5) in a ratio of 1 : 15 (w/v)<br />

and incubated at 45 ◦ C for 2 h. The mixture was subsequently<br />

centrifuged at 8000 × g for 15 min and the supernatant was<br />

collected. After adjusting its pH to the isoelectric point (pH 4.3)<br />

with 0.1 mol L −1 HCl, the supernatant was centrifuged at 8000 × g<br />

for 15 min. The precipitate was lyophilised and stored at −20 ◦ C.<br />

Enzymatic hydrolysis and degree of hydrolysis<br />

Neutrase was employed in this study. CPI (10 g) was suspended<br />

in distilled water (200 mL) and heated in a water bath at 90 ◦ C<br />

for 15 min prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. The enzymatic hydrolysis<br />

was carried out at 50 ◦ C and pH 7.5 for 4 h at an enzyme/substrate<br />

ratio of 6000 U g −1 . During hydrolysis the pH of the reaction<br />

mixture was adjusted every 30 min with 1 mol L −1 NaOH. When<br />

the reaction was finished, the enzyme was inactivated by heating<br />

at 95 ◦ C for 15 min. The resulting hydrolysate was rapidly cooled<br />

to ambient temperature in an ice bath and centrifuged at 8000 × g<br />

for 15 min. The supernatant was freeze-dried and stored at −20 ◦ C<br />

until use.<br />

The degree of hydrolysis (DH) was determined at 30 min<br />

intervals using a pH-stat method 9 based on the equation DH<br />

(%) = (h/htot) × 100, where h = B × Nb × (1/a) × (1/MP), B =<br />

base consumption (mL), Nb = concentration of base (1 mol L −1<br />

NaOH), 1/a = calibration factor for pH-stat, MP = mass of<br />

protein (g) andh = hydrolysis equivalents. For cottonseed protein,<br />

htot = 7.21 mmol g −1 .<br />

Size exclusion chromatography<br />

TheCPHsamplewasseparatedonaSephadexG-25column(1.5 cm<br />

× 50 cm) using an AKTA purifier (Amersham pharmacia biotech<br />

In., Piscataway, NJ, USA). Phosphate buffer solution (10 mmol L −1 ,<br />

pH 7.4) was used to equilibrate the column and to elute the<br />

proteins at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min −1 . A fixed amount of sample<br />

(1 mL) at a protein concentration of 100 mg mL −1 was applied to<br />

the column, and the absorbance of the eluate was measured at<br />

210 nm. A molecular weight calibration curve was plotted using<br />

the following standards: BSA (66 kDa), lysozyme (14.4 kDa), insulin<br />

from bovine pancreas (5.7 kDa), vitamin B12 (1.355 kDa), oxidised<br />

glutathione (0.612 kDa) and reduced glutathione (0.307 kDa). The<br />

CPH fractions were lyophilised and used for antioxidant activity<br />

tests.<br />

Measurement of antioxidant activity<br />

Inhibition of linoleic acid autoxidation<br />

The in vitro lipid peroxidation-inhibitory activity of peptides was<br />

determined by assessing their ability to inhibit the oxidation of<br />

linoleic acid in an emulsified model system. Briefly, the sample<br />

(15 mg) was dissolved in 1.5 mL of 50 mmol L −1 phosphate buffer<br />

(pH 7) and added to a mixture of ethanol (2.5 mL) and linoleic<br />

www.soci.org D Gao, Y Cao, H Li<br />

acid (32.5 µL), the final volume being adjusted to 5 mL with<br />

distilled water. The reaction mixture was incubated in a screwcapped<br />

tube at 60 ◦ C in the dark. At 24 h intervals, aliquots of the<br />

reaction mixture were withdrawn for measurement of oxidation<br />

by the TBA method 10 with modification. The reaction mixture<br />

(100 µL) was added to a mixture of 0.8 mL of trichloroacetic acid<br />

(TCA, 100 mg mL −1 ) and 1.5 mL of TBA (8 mg mL −1 )solutionin<br />

water. The mixture was cooled in an ice bath and centrifuged<br />

at 8000 × g for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was<br />

measured at 532 nm using an UltroSpec 4300 Pro UV–visible<br />

spectrophotometer (Pharmacia Co., Peapack, NJ, USA). The<br />

antioxidant activities of 10 mg mL −1 BHT and α-tocopherol were<br />

also assayed under the same conditions for comparison purposes.<br />

Scavenging effect on DPPH radical<br />

DPPH radical-scavenging activity was determined according to<br />

the method of Brand-Williams et al. 11 Briefly, 200 µL of test<br />

sample (10 mg mL −1 ) was added to 200 µL of 0.1 mmol L −1 DPPH<br />

dissolved in 950 mL L −1 ethanol. The mixture was shaken and<br />

incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The<br />

absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 517 nm. For<br />

comparison, ascorbate (10 mg mL −1 ) was used. The scavenging<br />

effect was expressed by the following equation:<br />

DPPH radical-scavenging activity (%) =<br />

[(blank absorbance − sample absorbance)/blank absorbance] × 100<br />

Scavenging effect on hydroxyl radical<br />

The scavenging effect on hydroxyl radical was measured by the<br />

deoxyribose method with modification. 12 The reaction mixture<br />

contained 1 mL of 0.2 mol L −1 sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4),<br />

0.2mL of 10mmolL −1 2-deoxyribose, 0.2 mL of 10 mmol L −1<br />

FeSO4/ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.2 mL of<br />

10 mmol L −1 hydrogen peroxide, 0.2 mL of distilled water and<br />

0.2 mL of sample solution (10 mg mL −1 ). The reaction was initiated<br />

by the addition of hydrogen peroxide. The reaction solution<br />

was incubated at 37 ◦ C for 1 h, then the reaction was stopped<br />

by the addition of 1 mL of TCA (28 mg mL −1 )and1mLofTBA<br />

(10 mg mL −1 ). The mixture was boiled for 10 min and cooled<br />

in ice, then its absorbance was measured at 532 nm. Ascorbate<br />

(10 mg mL −1 ) was tested under the same conditions for comparison.Theresultswerecalculatedaspercentageinhibitionaccording<br />

to the following equation:<br />

hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity (%) =<br />

[(Ac − As)/(Ac − A0)] × 100<br />

where Ac, As and A0 are the absorbances of the control, sample<br />

and blank sample respectively.<br />

Scavenging effect on superoxide radical<br />

The superoxide radical-scavenging capacity of the 4 h CPH<br />

and its fractions was examined using a pyrogallol autoxidation<br />

system with modification. 13 The reaction mixture contained<br />

70 µL of pyrogallol (10 mmol L −1 ), 4.5 mL of Tris/HCl/EDTA buffer<br />

(50 mmol L −1 ,pH8)and0.5mLofsample(10mgmL −1 ). The<br />

reaction solution was incubated at 25 ◦ Cfor30min,thenits<br />

absorbance was measured at 325 nm by spectrophotometry.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1855–1860


Antioxidant activity of cottonseed protein hydrolysate fractions www.soci.org<br />

Ascorbate (10 mg mL −1 ) was used for comparison. The scavenging<br />

rate was calculated according to the following equation:<br />

superoxide radical-scavenging rate (%) = [1 − (A1 − A2)/A0]×100<br />

where A0 is the absorbance of the control (without sample), A1<br />

is the absorbance in the presence of the sample and A2 was the<br />

absorbance of the sample without pyrogallol.<br />

Amino acid composition<br />

The lyophilised CPH fractions were hydrolysed with 6 mol L −1<br />

HCl at 110 ◦ C for 24 h under nitrogen and their derivatives were<br />

prepared using phenyl isothiocyanate prior to high-performance<br />

liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. Total and free amino acids<br />

were analysed by HPLC using a Capcell Pak (Shiseido CO., Tokyo,<br />

Japan) C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm) and UV detection at a<br />

flow rate of 1 mL min −1 . Seventeen amino acid standards were<br />

analysed at equal concentration. The amino acid composition was<br />

expressed as g amino acid kg −1 protein.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

All tests were executed in triplicate and mean values were<br />

calculated. Student’s t test was used to calculate the significance of<br />

differences between mean effects of a given compound compared<br />

with the control. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Enzymatic hydrolysis<br />

In quantitative work on protein hydrolysis it is necessary to have<br />

a measurement for the extent of hydrolytic degradation. It should<br />

be evident that the number of peptide bonds cleaved during the<br />

reaction is the parameter that most closely reflects the catalytic<br />

action of proteases. 9 The DH is defined as the percentage ratio of<br />

the number of peptide bonds broken (h) to the total number of<br />

bonds per unit weight (htot). It is generally used as a parameter for<br />

monitoring proteolysis and is the most widely used indicator for<br />

comparison among different protein hydrolysates. In our study the<br />

DH of the reaction solution increased with increasing incubation<br />

time, maintaining a high rate during the initial 90 min and then<br />

slowing down (Fig. 1), which implied that the maximum cleavage<br />

of peptides occurred within 90 min of hydrolysis. Thereafter the<br />

DH reached a plateau at 24.84% after 4 h. This result was similar to<br />

previous reports on the hydrolysis of other proteins such as those<br />

of silver carp and wheat gluten. 2,3<br />

Fractionation of CPH<br />

The CPH sample was fractionated by gel filtration column<br />

chromatography on Sephadex G-25 (Fig. 2). The hydrolysate<br />

was successfully separated into four fractions, I, II, III and IV,<br />

corresponding to molecular weights of >3.8, 1.2–3.8, 0.8–1.2<br />

and 4hCPH> fraction II > fraction IV.<br />

It was reported that the DPPH radical-scavenging activity of food<br />

protein hydrolysates may depend on the size of their constituent<br />

peptides. 16 Wang et al. 5 studied the antioxidant properties of<br />

wheat gluten hydrolysate. The hydrolysate was produced with<br />

papain and separated through an ultrafiltration membrane with a<br />

molecular weight cut-off of 5 kDa. They found that the 5 kDa<br />

permeate fraction had the strongest antioxidant activity and<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1855–1860 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1857


1858<br />

Figure 2. Pattern of CPH fractions separated by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25.<br />

Figure 3. Inhibitory effects of 4 h CPH and its fractions on lipid peroxidation<br />

measured in linoleic acid model systemover9days.HigherUVabsorbance<br />

at 532 nm represents higher linoleic acid peroxidation. Values are mean<br />

± standard deviation of three experiments. All experimental values were<br />

significant at P < 0.05 compared with the control.<br />

that the efficacy of the peptides depended on their molecular<br />

weight. Peptides with DPPH radical-scavenging activity derived<br />

from various enzymatic food protein hydrolysates have been<br />

reported in recent years. 5,15,16 Our results suggest that the CPH<br />

fractions possibly contained some substrates that were electron<br />

donors and could react with free radicals to convert them to more<br />

stable products, thus terminating the radical chain reaction.<br />

Scavenging effect on hydroxyl radical<br />

Hydroxyl radicals are extremely reactive species and induce severe<br />

damage to adjacent biomolecules, resulting in lipid peroxidation<br />

in biological systems. Therefore removal of hydroxyl radicals is<br />

probably one of the most effective defences of a living body<br />

against various diseases. In this study, hydroxyl radical-scavenging<br />

ability was measured by the 2-deoxyribose oxidation method.<br />

Table 1 shows the hydroxyl radical-scavenging effects of the 4 h<br />

CPH and its fractions. Fraction III exhibited the strongest hydroxyl<br />

radical-scavenging activity (52.67%). In addition, fraction II, the 4 h<br />

CPH, fraction I and fraction IV at the same concentration exhibited<br />

www.soci.org D Gao, Y Cao, H Li<br />

Table 1. Free radical-scavenging effects of CPH and its fractions<br />

Free radical-scavenging effect (%)<br />

Test sample DPPH Hydroxyl Superoxide<br />

4hCPH 50.03 ± 0.91 47.33 ± 1.12 34.59 ± 3.31<br />

Fraction I 50.27 ± 1.19 47.12 ± 0.80 14.81 ± 4.64<br />

Fraction II 48.08 ± 0.59 48.61 ± 0.67 51.06 ± 1.31<br />

Fraction III 72.19 ± 1.55 52.67 ± 0.32 73.23 ± 2.75<br />

Fraction IV 40.60 ± 1.17 46.59 ± 0.63 15.13 ± 0.55<br />

Ascorbate 77.36 ± 1.18 69.19 ± 0.49 79.31 ± 0.34<br />

48.61,47.33,47.12and46.59%hydroxylradical-scavengingactivity<br />

respectively. Thus all tested fractions possessed hydroxyl radicalscavenging<br />

activity. The antioxidant activity of hydrolysates from<br />

many kinds of food proteins has been studied in recent years. Peng<br />

et al. 15 reported that whey protein hydrolysate and its peptide<br />

fractions showed antioxidant properties against hydroxyl radical<br />

similar to the results of this study. Li et al. 17 obtained a peptide<br />

fraction from chickpea protein hydrolysate showing 81.39%<br />

hydroxyl radical-scavenging ability. Kim et al. 18 found that hoki<br />

(Johnius belengerii) frame protein hydrolysate exhibited 84.93%<br />

hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity. It is difficult to compare the<br />

results from related studies, because the antioxidant assay systems<br />

employed are frequently modified, so that the antioxidants most in<br />

use, such as ascorbate, BHT and butylated hydroxyanisole, should<br />

be applied as a comparison at a certain concentration to evaluate<br />

the antioxidant ability of the test sample.<br />

Scavenging effect on superoxide radical<br />

Superoxide radicals are generated by a number of biological<br />

reactions. Although they do not directly initiate lipid oxidation, superoxide<br />

radical anions are potential precursors of highly reactive<br />

species such as hydroxyl radicals and hydrogen peroxide. 19 Not<br />

only superoxide anion radicals but also their derivatives are celldamaging,<br />

which can cause damage to the DNA and membrane<br />

of cells. Therefore it is of great importance to scavenge superoxide<br />

anion radicals.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1855–1860


Antioxidant activity of cottonseed protein hydrolysate fractions www.soci.org<br />

Pyrogallic acid can automatically oxidise under alkaline conditions<br />

to produce superoxide radicals directly, the constant rate of<br />

this autoxidation reaction being dependent on the pyrogallic acid<br />

concentration. The results of our experiment showed that fraction<br />

III possessed the highest superoxide radical-scavenging activity<br />

(73.23%), which was slightly inferior to that of ascorbate (79.31%).<br />

The scavenging effect of fraction III on superoxide radicals was<br />

similar to that of antioxidant peptides isolated from gelatin hydrolysates<br />

obtained from the skin of sole and squid. 20 Fraction<br />

II, the 4 h CPH, fraction IV and fraction I showed 51.06, 34.59,<br />

15.13 and 14.81% superoxide radical-scavenging ability respectively.<br />

Based on the results described above, fraction III had good<br />

free radical-scavenging activity and could be a potential source of<br />

natural antioxidants.<br />

Amino acid composition<br />

Kim et al. 21 reported that several amino acids such as His, Pro,<br />

Ala and Leu contribute to the scavenging of free radicals. For<br />

protein hydrolysates and peptides an increase in hydrophobicity<br />

will increase their solubility in lipid and therefore enhance their<br />

antioxidantactivity. 22 In particular, His-containing peptides exhibit<br />

strong antioxidant activity owing to the decomposition of the<br />

imidazole group of His. 23 In the case of wheat gelatin peptides the<br />

abundance of amino acids such as His, Leu, Val and Ala present<br />

in the sequence of hydrolysate peptides favours their radicalscavenging<br />

properties. 5 The amino acid composition of the CPH<br />

fractions in the present study is shown in Table 2. Fraction III was<br />

rich in Phe, His, Pro, Met, Ile and Cys compared with the other<br />

fractions. In addition, the total amino acid content in fraction III<br />

was higher than that in the other fractions. It was demonstrated<br />

that the antioxidant activity of the CPH fractions was related to the<br />

composition and sequence of amino acids and that the abundance<br />

of the amino acids Phe, His, Pro, Met, Ile and Cys in fraction III may<br />

correlate with its strong antioxidant activity.<br />

Table 2. Amino acid (AA) composition of CPH fractions<br />

Composition (g kg −1 protein)<br />

Amino acid Fraction I Fraction II Fraction III Fraction IV<br />

Aspartic acid 25.18 42.89 40.23 16.19<br />

Glutamic acid 137.60 51.80 13.56 2.24<br />

Serine 11.03 9.18 3.50 1.08<br />

Histidine 7.52 10.22 12.79 10.86<br />

Arginine 62.05 33.10 25.47 –<br />

Glycine 12.33 12.32 6.63 1.55<br />

Threonine 6.18 9.29 2.85 7.26<br />

Proline 12.57 7.74 10.97 –<br />

Alanine 3.11 9.88 3.62 –<br />

Valine 3.54 7.88 2.84 –<br />

Methionine 6.25 8.45 12.39 –<br />

Cysteine 8.36 11.10 14.74 –<br />

Isoleucine 30.20 3.32 37.22 41.93<br />

Leucine 4.74 11.12 4.94 –<br />

Phenylalanine 228.98 330.24 425.62 322.75<br />

Lysine 7.89 4.71 1.01 –<br />

Tyrosine – – – –<br />

Total AA 567.5 563.2 616.8 403.9<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Peptides with strong antioxidant activity were produced by<br />

hydrolysis of cottonseed protein with Neutrase. The CPH sample<br />

was successfully separated into four fractions (I, II, III and IV) by gel<br />

filtration column chromatography on Sephadex G-25. The results<br />

revealed that fraction III (0.8–1.2 kDa) had the highest antioxidant<br />

and free radical-scavenging activities. The amino acid composition<br />

of the fractions was analysed and it was found that fraction III<br />

contained higher levels of Phe, His, Pro, Met, Ile and Cys. This may<br />

correlate with its strong antioxidant activity. The results suggested<br />

that the antioxidant peptide fractions from cottonseed protein<br />

might be useful as food additives and diet nutrients and also<br />

pharmaceutically. However, further research is needed to isolate<br />

the individual peptides responsible for the antioxidant activity of<br />

CPH and to identify their amino acid sequences, which will allow<br />

a better understanding of the peptide structure–functionality<br />

relationship.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Halliwell B and Gutteridge JMC, Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine.<br />

Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 143–157 (1999).<br />

2 DongS,ZengM,WangD,LiuZ,ZhaoYandYangH,Antioxidantand<br />

biochemical properties of protein hydrolysates prepared from silver<br />

carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Food Chem 107:1485–1493<br />

(2008).<br />

3 Kong X, Zhou H and Qian H, Enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat gluten by<br />

proteases and properties of the resulting hydrolysates. Food Chem<br />

102:759–763 (2007).<br />

4 MoureA, Domínguez H and Parajo JC, Antioxidant properties of<br />

ultrafiltration-recovered soy protein fractions from industrial<br />

effluents and their hydrolysates. Process Biochem 41:447–456<br />

(2006).<br />

5 Wang JS, Zhao MM, Zhao QZ and Jiang YM, Antioxidant properties of<br />

papain hydrolysates of wheat gluten in different oxidation systems.<br />

Food Chem 101:1658–1663 (2007).<br />

6 Yoshie-Stark Y, Wada Y and Wäsche A, Chemical composition,<br />

functional properties, and bioactivities of rapeseed protein isolates.<br />

Food Chem 107:32–39 (2008).<br />

7 Ory RL and Flick GJ, Peanut and Cotton Seed Protein for Food Uses,<br />

In new and developing sources of food proteins, ed. by Hudson BJF.<br />

Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 195–240 (1994).<br />

8 Tunc S and Duman O, Thermodynamic properties and moisture<br />

adsorption isotherms of cottonseed protein isolate and different<br />

forms of cottonseed samples. J Food Eng 81:133–143 (2007).<br />

9 Alder-Nissen J, Enzymic Hydrolysis of Food Proteins. Elsevier Applied<br />

Science, New York, NY, pp. 122–124 (1986).<br />

10 Ohkawa H, Ohishi N and Yagi K, Assay for lipid peroxides in animal<br />

tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 95:351–358<br />

(1979).<br />

11 Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME and Berset C, Use of a free radical<br />

method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT – Food Sci Technol<br />

28:25–30 (1995).<br />

12 Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC and Aruoma OI, The deoxyribose method:<br />

a simple test tube assay for determination of rate constants for<br />

hydroxyl radicals. Anal Biochem 165:215–219 (1987).<br />

13 Marklund S and Marklund G, Involvement of the superoxide anion<br />

radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for<br />

superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem 47:469–474 (1974).<br />

14 Janero DR, Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid reactivity as<br />

diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue<br />

injury. Free Radic Biol Med 9:515–540 (1990).<br />

15 Peng X, Xiong YL and Kong B, Antioxidant activity of peptide fractions<br />

from whey protein hydrolysates as measured by electron spin<br />

resonance. Food Chem 113:196–201 (2009).<br />

16 Li XX, Han LJ and Chen LJ, In vitro antioxidant activity of protein<br />

hydrolysates prepared from corn gluten meal. J Sci Food Agric<br />

88:1660–1666 (2008).<br />

17 Li Y, Jiang B, Zhang T, Mu W and Liu J, Antioxidant and free radicalscavenging<br />

activities of chickpea protein hydrolysate (CPH). Food<br />

Chem 106:444–450 (2008).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1855–1860 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1859


1860<br />

18 Kim SY, Je JY and Kim SK, Purification and characterization of<br />

antioxidant peptide from hoki (Johnius belengerii) frameprotein<br />

by gastrointestinal digestion. JNutrBiochem18:31–38 (2007).<br />

19 Chawla SP, Chander R and Sharma A, Antioxidant properties of<br />

Maillard reaction products obtained by gamma-irradiation of whey<br />

proteins. Food Chem 116:122–128 (2009).<br />

20 Giménez B, Alemán A, Montero P and Gómez-Guillén MC, Antioxidant<br />

and functional properties of gelatin hydrolysates obtained from<br />

skin of sole and squid. Food Chem 114:976–983 (2009).<br />

21 Kim SK, Kim YT, Byun HG, Nam KS, Joo DS and Shahidi F, Isolation and<br />

characterization of antioxidative peptides from gelatin hydrolysate<br />

of Alaska pollack skin. J Agric Food Chem 49:1984–1989 (2001).<br />

www.soci.org D Gao, Y Cao, H Li<br />

22 RajapakseN,MendisE,ByunHGandKimSK,Purificationandin vitro<br />

antioxidative effects of giant squid muscle peptides on free radicalmediated<br />

oxidative systems. JNutrBiochem16:562–569 (2005).<br />

23 Li B, Chen F, Wang X, Ji B and Wu Y, Isolation and identification<br />

of antioxidative peptides from porcine collagen hydrolysate by<br />

consecutive chromatography and electrospray ionization-mass<br />

spectrometry. Food Chem 102:1135–1143 (2007).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1855–1860


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 18 February 2010 Revised: 25 March 2010 Accepted: 25 March 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 19 May 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4025<br />

Birds select conventional over organic wheat<br />

when given free choice<br />

Ailsa J McKenzie ∗ and Mark J Whittingham<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Global demand for organic produce is increasing by ¤4 billion annually. One key reason why consumers buy<br />

organic food is because they consider it to be better for human and animal health. Reviews comparing organic and conventional<br />

food have stated that organic food is preferred by birds and mammals in choice tests.<br />

RESULTS: This study shows the opposite result – that captive birds in the laboratory and wild garden birds both consumed<br />

more conventional than organic wheat when given free choice. There was a lag in preference formation during which time<br />

birds learnt to distinguish between the two food types, which is likely to explain why the present results differ from those of<br />

previous studies. A further experiment confirmed that, of 16 potential causal factors, detection by birds of consistently higher<br />

levels of protein in conventional seeds (a common difference between many organic and conventional foodstuffs) is the likely<br />

mechanism behind this pattern.<br />

CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the current dogma that organic food is preferred to conventional food may<br />

not always be true, which is of considerable importance for consumer perceptions of organically grown food.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Supporting information may be found in the online version of this article.<br />

Keywords: organic food; farmland; consumer perceptions; diet selection; protein selection<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Sales of organic food have increased exponentially over the last<br />

decade and now account for between 2 and 3% of all food<br />

purchased in Europe and the USA. International sales are now<br />

estimated at ¤28.5 billion per annum, twice the figure reported<br />

in 2000. 1 While perceptions about improved ‘quality’ and ‘safety’<br />

of organic foods are widely held, 2 scientific evidence for the<br />

superiority of organic produce is scarce. 3<br />

One body of evidence that supports these perceptions is the<br />

reported preference of a range of birds and mammals for organic<br />

over conventional foodstuffs. While results of preference tests in<br />

humans have been largely equivocal, several studies have found<br />

both hens and rats to prefer organically grown beetroot and wheat<br />

to that grown conventionally. 4–7<br />

However, we believe the methodologies employed by the<br />

majority of these studies to be unsuitable. No attempt has<br />

typically been made to determine the proximate cause of the<br />

observed preference. Preference for one particular food type over<br />

another must be driven by some quantifiable difference between<br />

the foods presented. Without investigation of such differences,<br />

interpretation of results, and an assessment of their broader<br />

application, is impossible. Determination of causation is also<br />

important in trial design, as it will influence the time that test<br />

animals require to make a correct selection. While differences in<br />

physical properties such as taste or texture will tend to be identified<br />

rapidly by test animals, preferences governed by differences that<br />

require a post-ingestional response (e.g. nutritional differences<br />

not associated with a flavour) will tend to take longer to<br />

establish. Depending on the intensity of the difference detected,<br />

post-ingestional responses can take up to several weeks to<br />

manifest in a consistent choice. Turkeys, for example, were<br />

found to take up to 3 weeks to show a consistent selection from<br />

nutritionally limiting and non-limiting diets. 8 Previous preference<br />

studies, on which the conclusions that organic food is preferred<br />

to conventional food have been based, were carried out for a<br />

maximum of 7 days. 4–7 This may simply not have been sufficient<br />

timeforareliablechoicetobecomeestablished.<br />

We carried out a series of four preference experiments using<br />

a number of conventional and organic wheat samples. Organic<br />

and conventional foodstuffs have been found to differ in many<br />

ways, although not always consistently. They have been shown<br />

to differ in their physical properties (e.g. size, shape, texture,<br />

taste, odour), toxin and residue levels (e.g. fungi and mycotoxins,<br />

plant secondary metabolites, pesticide residues, microbial toxins)<br />

and nutrition levels (e.g. protein and nitrogen levels, amino<br />

acids, certain vitamins and minerals). 9,10 Differences in many<br />

of these properties have been shown previously to instigate<br />

a selection response for one particular food over another (e.g.<br />

mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) level, 11,12 protein, 13,14 pesticide<br />

residue 15,16 ). In accordance with this evidence, test foods were<br />

analysed for the 16 properties deemed most likely (from the<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Ailsa J McKenzie, School of Biology, Newcastle University,<br />

Ridley Building, Claremont Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.<br />

E-mail: a.j.mckenzie@ncl.ac.uk<br />

School of Biology, Newcastle University, Ridley Building, Claremont Road,<br />

NewcastleuponTyneNE17RU,UK<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1861


1862<br />

Table 1. Justification for selection of the 16 compounds measured in wheat samples<br />

www.soci.org AJ McKenzie, MJ Whittingham<br />

Compound/chemical Reason for inclusion<br />

Nutritional<br />

Energy Selection for energy forms basis of optimal diet theory59,60 Protein Certain bird species shown to be able to select diets to optimise protein intake. 13,33 Levels shown to<br />

vary between organic and conventional foods4,9,10 Amino acids Birds possess amino acid appetites, especially when foods are particularly deficient. 59,61 Amino acid<br />

levels shown to differ between organic and conventional foods62 Moisture Shown to influence seed selection28 Fat Shown to influence seed selection28 Carbohydrate Shown to influence seed selection28 Contaminants<br />

DON Detection of this mycotoxin in food shown to deter feeding in birds and mammals11,12 Microbes (E. coli, Salmonella spp.,<br />

Unclear if they deter feeding, but organic produce may contain higher levels<br />

Enterobacteriaceae)<br />

3<br />

Heavy metals Some suggestion that cadmium and lead levels vary between organic and conventional foods. 3 Birds<br />

able to detect and avoid high levels in food34 Oxalic acid Used as a proxy for general plant secondary compounds which may be higher in organic foods and<br />

deter feeding. Oxalic acid levels reflect stress in plants and thus likely to correlate with levels of<br />

other stress chemicals39 Pesticide residues Shown to deter feeding by birds. 15,16 Levels typically differ between foods of the two regimes as a<br />

result of input differences (i.e. lower in organic produce) 10,36<br />

Physical<br />

Thousand-seed weight (TSW) Seed size affects handling time, which ultimately influences food selection28 Hardness Texture shown to influence seed selection28 literature) to differ between foods from the two regimes and<br />

to instigate a selection response (Table 1). This enabled us<br />

to investigate mechanisms behind any observed preference<br />

behaviour in the way not achieved previously.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Test foods<br />

Wheat of the variety ‘Alchemy’ was selected for use in the current<br />

suite of experiments. Wheat is the most important agricultural<br />

crop worldwide, with a production of 585 × 10 6 tons per annum, 17<br />

and is known to be eaten by a wide range of farmland bird<br />

species 18 (e.g. yellowhammer Emberiza citrinella, house sparrow<br />

Passer domesticus,cornbuntingEmberiza calandra). In Europe it is<br />

a particularly important food source during winter when granivorous<br />

birds are known to select stubble fields (of which wheat is the<br />

most common) in preference to other field types. 19–21 Therefore<br />

the preference of organic and conventional wheat is of relevance<br />

to the wider ecology of many declining farmland bird species.<br />

Experiment 1. Laboratory canary experiment<br />

One 50 kg sample each of commercially grown conventional and<br />

organic wheat (variety ‘Alchemy’) was purchased from farmers in<br />

the UK for use in this experiment. Product characteristics therefore<br />

reflect what is produced and available to birds in the UK. Twelve<br />

canaries were housed in individual cages (90 cm × 80 cm × 45 cm)<br />

under a 12/12 h light/dark regime. Room temperature was kept<br />

relatively constant, varying between 12 and 15 ◦ C. Birds were<br />

settled for 10 days prior to the commencement of feeding trials.<br />

They were provided with standard canary food when not taking<br />

part in trials and water ad libitum. Prior to and during the trial<br />

periods, birds were also given small quantities of a mix of the<br />

organic and conventional wheat subsequently used in the trial<br />

to become accustomed to consuming the test foods. During<br />

trial periods the basic canary feed was removed from each cage<br />

1 h prior to lights-off the night before the trial, trials beginning<br />

approximately 1 h after lights-on the following morning. The order<br />

in which trials were carried out was randomised daily between<br />

birds. The trial involved birds being presented with organic and<br />

conventional wheat in identical bowls on the cage floor. The seeds<br />

were ground in a coffee grinder (for approximately equal amounts<br />

oftime)andsieved(using2 mmsieves)toasimilarsize.Thecontent<br />

and position of the bowls were randomised between birds but<br />

remained the same for each bird throughout each set of trials, as<br />

the length of learning period required for associations to be made<br />

between food and position in the laboratory was unknown. Food<br />

was presented for 20 min and the number of successful pecks<br />

(seeds eaten rather than seeds handled) made during this time<br />

was recorded using a click-counter (by an observer sitting quietly<br />

at a standard distance of 2 m from each cage). Peck rate was used<br />

in the experiment rather than weight consumed, as test birds<br />

tended to knock seed from bowls onto the cage floor, making it<br />

impossible to calculate total amounts ingested through weight<br />

measurements. Trials were mostly carried out on consecutive days.<br />

General linear mixed models (GLMM) were constructed for data<br />

from the trials in R (Version 2.9.1) 22 using the ‘lmer’ function of the<br />

package LME4. 23,24 Difference in peck number on the two grain<br />

types was included as the response variable and bird as a random<br />

effect. The key test was the significance of the difference in peck<br />

number between the two grain types. This was determined by<br />

fitting the null model (i.e. no predictors) whilst controlling for<br />

the random effect ‘bird’. The intercept was tested for a difference<br />

from zero, with a zero value indicating the same amount of food<br />

eaten from both samples. T and P values for the significance of<br />

the difference from zero are given in the output of the GLMM.<br />

In addition to this, a maximum likelihood ratio test was run to<br />

determine the effect of trial number on the magnitude of the<br />

difference in peck rate.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869


Birds select conventional over organic wheat www.soci.org<br />

Experiments 2 and 3. Garden bird experiments<br />

Experiment 2 was carried out using three 50 kg samples of<br />

conventional wheat supplied by different farmers (one of which<br />

was the same as that used in Experiment 1) and one organic<br />

sample (the same as was used in Experiment 1). Wheat samples<br />

supplied by two different farmers were used in Experiment 3 (one<br />

each of conventional and organic). All samples were of the variety<br />

‘Alchemy’. Experiment 2 was carried out over 6 weeks during<br />

January–March2008.Consumptionoforganicversusconventional<br />

grain (of one of the three types) from plastic tube-style bird<br />

feeders was measured every 2 days in 36 gardens in northeast<br />

England. Wheat typically represents a very small proportion of<br />

commercial foods presented to garden birds (CJ Wild Bird Foods,<br />

personal communication), therefore the likelihood of a neophobic<br />

response to one type of wheat over another was unlikely (i.e. birds<br />

are unlikely to be already accustomed to either type of wheat).<br />

Selected gardens were a minimum of 400 m apart to limit the<br />

risk of the same birds visiting feeders in different gardens. Two<br />

feeders (A and B) were placed close together (maximum 40 cm<br />

apart) in each garden in positions matched for distance to cover,<br />

to limit positional effects in feeder selection. Feeders were filled<br />

from coded bags individual to each garden, which allowed all fills<br />

to be carried out blind. The position of the feeders was swapped<br />

at the beginning of week 4 to eliminate any positional effects.<br />

Experiment 3 was carried out in the same way over 8 weeks from<br />

January to March 2009 using 15 gardens.<br />

DatawereanalysedasinExperiment1, withbothyearsmodelled<br />

separately, using difference in consumption (conventional minus<br />

organic) as the response variable and garden as a random<br />

effect. Initial inspection of the data showed a likely interaction<br />

between time (i.e. week) and the magnitude of the difference in<br />

consumption. Therefore the above model was rerun with a time<br />

component added as a predictor, with the difference between the<br />

two models (with and without time) calculated to determine the<br />

overall effect of time (a likelihood ratio test). The time component<br />

used was not ‘week’ but ‘time since switch’ to account for the<br />

impact of switching the feeders midway through the trial period.<br />

Experiment 4. Protein experiment<br />

New samples of ‘Alchemy’ wheat (i.e. not used in any previous<br />

experiment) were obtained from Suffolk and Cambridge Crop<br />

Station (SACCS), Great Wilbraham, UK. This wheat had been grown<br />

in a single field under identical conditions but had received four<br />

different fertiliser levels (calcium ammonium nitrate at 150, 175,<br />

200 and 225 kg ha −1 ). This resulted in four conventionally grown<br />

samples that varied in protein content but were similar in every<br />

other way. The two samples with the lowest and the highest<br />

protein levels were presented to the canaries in the trials (9.21 and<br />

10.23 g per 100 g respectively). These protein levels were similar<br />

to those detected in the wheat used in Experiments 1–3. All grain<br />

was ground as in Experiment 1. Given the significance of time in<br />

the establishment of preference for one grain type over another,<br />

it was decided that a 10 day learning period should be carried out<br />

prior to data collection with the two grain types. Therefore birds<br />

were presented with the two types of grain in the same way as in<br />

Experiment 1 for 10 days, with data collection beginning on day<br />

11 and running for 5 days. It should be noted that only nine birds<br />

were used in this experiment, as one died in the interval between<br />

Experiments 1 and 2 and a further two became unwell. Statistical<br />

analyses were carried out as in Experiments 1–3.<br />

Physical and chemical analyses of test foods<br />

Substantial literature searches were carried out before selection of<br />

the compounds and chemicals for analysis in the wheat samples<br />

(Table 1). As outlined in the ‘Introduction’, those selected are<br />

the ones most likely to vary between organic and conventional<br />

foodstuffs and to instigate a bird selection response (for full<br />

justification see Table 1).<br />

All samples used in Experiments 1–3 (two organic samples<br />

and four conventional samples) were analysed for physical<br />

properties (thousand-seed weight (TSW), hardness), nutritional<br />

information (moisture, protein (N × 6.25), fat, carbohydrate, energy,<br />

amino acids), toxin burden (DON, microbes), secondary<br />

compounds (oxalic acid as a proxy) and pesticide residues.<br />

The wheat used in Experiment 4 was analysed for protein<br />

only. As these wheat samples were grown in the same field<br />

under identical conditions other than nitrogen input, they<br />

are unlikely to differ from one another in any significant<br />

way. Justification of this decision is continued in the ‘Discussion’.<br />

All samples were analysed using samples of equal weight.<br />

Means and standard errors for each of these were calculated from<br />

samples taken (minimum of four). Physical analysis was carried out<br />

by NIAB, Cambridge, nutritional and heavy metal analysis by ILS<br />

and Salamon and Seaber, London, pesticide screening by Eclipse<br />

Scientific Group, Chatteris, mycotoxin analysis by Central Science<br />

Laboratory (CSL), Sand Hutton, amino acid analysis by Protein and<br />

Nucleic Acid Chemistry Facility (PNAC), University of Cambridge<br />

and oxalic acid analysis by Intertek, Germany.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Experiment 1. Laboratory canary experiment<br />

Across all 12 birds over all trials, 34% pecks were carried out on<br />

organic and 66% on conventional grain. Overall, birds significantly<br />

preferred conventional to organic wheat (T = 4.07, d.f. = 180,<br />

P < 0.001). There was a significant temporal trend in the data,<br />

with the significance of treatment increasing with trial number<br />

(T = 11.90, d.f. = 1, P < 0.005) (Fig. 1). Mean preference decreased<br />

during trials 5–7 before increasing at trial 8 and remaining at a<br />

high level for the remainder of the trial period (Fig. 1). For the<br />

first seven trials, birds made on average 69 (±23.4) more pecks<br />

per 20 min trial on conventional than on organic wheat, while for<br />

the remaining eight trials the difference was more than double<br />

that – 155 (±22.8) more pecks made on conventional than on<br />

organic seeds.<br />

Experiments 2 and 3. Garden bird experiments<br />

In Experiment 2, of 36 gardens, no feeding occurred in four, so<br />

only data from the remaining 32 gardens could be included in the<br />

analysis. Total depletion over the entire trial period was 58 954 g,<br />

45% organic and 55% conventional wheat. More conventional<br />

than organic grain was consumed in 24 out of 32 gardens overall.<br />

Results of the GLMM showed a highly significant preference for<br />

conventional over organic wheat across all sites (T = 3.41, d.f.<br />

= 128, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2). The effect of time was not significant<br />

overall (T = 2.68, d.f. = 1, P = 0.10); however, when the first and<br />

last 3 weeks were modelled separately, time significantly affected<br />

the difference during weeks 1–3 (T = 6.14, d.f. = 1, P < 0.05) but<br />

not during weeks 4–6 (T = 0.57, d.f. = 1, P = 0.50) (Fig. 2). The<br />

three different types of conventional wheat were not consumed<br />

differently (relative to the same organic wheat) by wild birds<br />

(χ 2 = 1.55, d.f. = 2, P = 0.46).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1863


1864<br />

www.soci.org AJ McKenzie, MJ Whittingham<br />

Figure 1. Experiment 1. Mean (± standard error) difference in the number of successful pecks made on the two types of wheat (conventional minus<br />

organic) from trials 1–15 across 12 canaries. Successful pecks were those made where a piece of grain was consumed by the bird. Significantly more<br />

conventional than organic wheat was consumed overall (T = 4.07, d.f. = 180, P < 0.001) and there was also a significant effect of trial on the magnitude<br />

of the difference (T = 11.90, d.f. = 1, P < 0.005).<br />

Figure 2. Experiment 2. Mean (± standard error) difference in consumption per week between conventional and organic wheat from feeders in 32<br />

gardens in northeast England in February–March 2008 (all gardens were at least 400 m apart). Feeders were switched at the beginning of week 4.<br />

Significantly more conventional than organic grain was consumed overall (T = 3.41, d.f. = 128, P < 0.001). In both periods (weeks 1–3 and weeks 4–6)<br />

the preference for conventional grain increased with time (i.e. time since trial start and time since feeder position switch), but only in the first 3 weeks<br />

was this significant (T = 6.14, d.f. = 1, P < 0.05).<br />

In Experiment 3, total depletion over the 8 week period<br />

was 41 508 g, 40% organic and 60% conventional wheat. More<br />

conventional than organic grain was consumed in all 15 gardens<br />

in the experiment. The GLMM again found a significant effect of<br />

treatment on consumption (T = 2.25, d.f. = 83, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3).<br />

There was no significant effect of time on preference overall<br />

(T = 1.10, d.f. = 1, P = 0.29) or when the first and second periods<br />

(i.e. before and after position switch) were considered separately<br />

(weeks 1–4: T = 0.94, d.f. = 1, P = 0.33; weeks 5–8: T = 1.11, d.f.<br />

= 1, P = 0.29). However, the parameter estimates do indicate a<br />

tendency to consume more conventional wheat as the experiment<br />

progressed.<br />

Experiment 4. Protein experiment<br />

Two birds were not used in the experiment as they became unwell<br />

midway through the learning period. They later recovered but not<br />

in time to be included in the experiment. The remaining birds<br />

ate more of the higher- than the lower-protein wheat during the<br />

trial days (mean difference 77 ± 17.6 pecks)(T = 2.58, d.f. = 41,<br />

P < 0.05) (Fig. 4). Eight out of nine birds consumed more highthan<br />

low-protein wheat overall, although some birds showed<br />

stronger preferences than others.<br />

Physical and chemical analyses of test foods<br />

A summary of the analysis can be found in Table 2 (for full analysis<br />

results see ‘Supporting information (SI)’). Of the 16 different<br />

properties of the seeds measured (and considered a priori to have<br />

some potential to influence selection), only protein content (g per<br />

100 g) differed consistently between organic and conventional<br />

samples, with levels being always higher in conventional than in<br />

organic samples (Experiment 1: 26% higher (organic 8.96±0.04 vs<br />

conventional 12.10 ± 0.05); Experiment 2: 6–26% higher (organic<br />

8.96 ± 0.04 vs conventional 10.45 ± 0.37 (9.51 ± 0.08, 9.71 ± 0.35,<br />

12.10 ± 0.05)); Experiment 3: 14% higher (organic 7.75 ± 0.11 vs<br />

conventional 8.97 ± 0.07)) (Table 2).<br />

Energy content (kJ per 100 g) was not always significantly<br />

higher in conventional wheat seeds (Experiment 1: conventional<br />

1476 ± 4.23 vs organic 1450 ± 2.72 (F1,6 = 39.29, P < 0.001);<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869


Birds select conventional over organic wheat www.soci.org<br />

Figure 3. Experiment 3. Mean (± standard error) difference in consumption per week between conventional and organic wheat from feeders in 15<br />

gardens in January–March 2009. Feeders were switched at the beginning of week 5. Significantly more conventional than organic grain was consumed<br />

overall (T = 2.25, d.f. = 83, P < 0.05). There was no significant effect of time on the magnitude of the difference (T = 1.10, d.f. = 1, P = 0.29), although<br />

the trend was in the same direction as in Experiment 2.<br />

Figure 4. Experiment 4. Mean (± standard error) difference in peck number between the low- and high-protein wheat (high minus low) from trials 1–5<br />

across nine canaries. Significantly more high- than low-protein wheat was consumed overall (T = 2.58, d.f. = 41, P < 0.05).<br />

Experiment 2: conventional 1482 ± 3.61 vs organic 1450 ± 2.72<br />

(F1,14 = 24.62, P < 0.001); Experiment 3: conventional 1483±2.58<br />

vs organic 1493 ± 1.22 (F1,6 = 39.29, P < 0.01)) (Table 2).<br />

No consistency was found in levels of the mycotoxin DON<br />

(µgkg −1 ) between treatments across experiments (Experiment<br />

1: conventional 46.0 ± 21.5 vs organic 201 ± 59.9 (F1,6 = 5.98,<br />

P = 0.05); Experiment 2: conventional 323 ± 110 vs organic<br />

201 ± 59.9(F1,14 = 0.20, P = 0.66 n.s.)) (Table 2).<br />

TSW of the organic grain used in Experiments 1 and 2 was<br />

statistically lower than that of any of the conventional grain<br />

samples (Experiment 1: 10.3% less (F1,6 = 319.4, P < 0.001);<br />

Experiment 2: 11.1% less (F1,14 = 345.9, P < 0.001)) (Table 2).<br />

Levels of moisture, fat, carbohydrate, pesticide residues, cadmium,<br />

lead, microbial contamination (Escherichia coli, Salmonella<br />

spp., Enterobacteriaceae), oxalic acid (as a proxy for plant secondary<br />

compounds), hardness (endosperm percentage crude<br />

protein) and amino acid content were not significantly different<br />

between samples, did differ but not consistently between<br />

experiments (see ‘SI’) or, in the case of pesticide residues, were<br />

operating in the opposite direction to that predicted (see ‘SI’).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

We show that, across a range of experiments in two different<br />

study systems, birds preferred conventionally to organically grown<br />

wheat. This finding is novel and differs from all previous preference<br />

studies with organic and conventional foods. 4–7 As such, it is likely<br />

to be of considerable interest to a range of scientists and shed new<br />

light on consumer perceptions of organic food. 2<br />

We believe our findings may differ from those of previous<br />

studies because of methodological issues – previous studies may<br />

not have been carried out in a way that allowed true preferences<br />

to become fully realised. In the current study, preference for the<br />

conventional food presented was only consistent after a delay<br />

period (around seven trials in Experiment 1 (Fig. 1) and 1 week<br />

in Experiments 2 and 3 (Figs 2 and 3)). This delay is evidence of<br />

a learning interval, something which may have been precluded<br />

by the short trial duration employed in previous studies. If this<br />

interval forms a significant part of the food testing period, then<br />

the results of the test may be compromised. 25 Previous feeding<br />

studies (which have all been carried out in the laboratory) have<br />

been run for a maximum of 7 days, typically 5 days or less, normally<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1865


1866<br />

www.soci.org AJ McKenzie, MJ Whittingham<br />

Table 2. Mean values (± standard error; n = 4 for each sample) and test statistics of four of the main potential drivers of selection from the organic<br />

and conventional wheat used in Experiments 1–3<br />

Exp. Wheat Protein (g per 100 g) Energy (kJ per 100 g) DON (µgkg −1 ) TSW(g)<br />

1 Org. 8.96 ± 0.04 F1,6 = 2345 1450 ± 2.72 F1,6 = 39.29 201 ± 59.9 F1,6 = 5.98 40.90 ± 0.14 F1,6 = 319.4<br />

Conv. 12.10±0.05 P < 0.001 1476±4.23 P < 0.001 46.0 ± 21.5 P = 0.05 45.58±0.22 P < 0.001<br />

2 Org. 8.96 ± 0.04 F1,14 = 5.05 1450 ± 2.72 F1,14 = 24.62 201 ± 59.9 F1,14 = 0.20 40.90 ± 0.14 F1,14 = 345.9<br />

Conv. 10.45±0.37 P < 0.05 1482±3.61 P < 0.001 323 ± 110 P = 0.66 46.03±0.15 P < 0.001<br />

3 Org. 7.75±0.11 F1,6 = 85.00 1493±1.22 F1,6 = 39.29 Not tested Not tested<br />

Conv. 8.97 ± 0.07 P < 0.001 1483 ± 2.58 P < 0.01<br />

with no learning period prior to trials. Therefore these studies may<br />

simply not have allowed sufficient time for true preferences to<br />

become established.<br />

In order for learning to occur, the ingestion of a certain food must<br />

instigate some sort of metabolic response that can be monitored<br />

and learned. 13 In birds, this effect must be associated with some<br />

visual cue that acts to differentiate between foodstuffs. 13 In the<br />

current study the visual cue is most likely to be bowl or feeder<br />

position, as switching positions was shown to temporarily disrupt<br />

food selection preferences in Experiments 2 and 3 (positions were<br />

not switched in Experiment 1).<br />

Analysis of the wheat used in Experiments 1–3 (based on<br />

samples of wheat of equal weight) has allowed us to discount a<br />

large number of factors as responsible for the preference observed<br />

(for summary of results see Table 2; for full details see ‘SI’). We<br />

consider each of these in turn below.<br />

Differences in physical properties – size, hardness and taste<br />

Granivorous birds have been found to select seeds in accordance<br />

with a range of variables. 26 Many of these relate to the physical<br />

properties of seeds such as size, texture and hardness, taste and<br />

speed of processing. 27,28 While conventional wheat grains in the<br />

current experiment were typically larger in terms of TSW than<br />

organic grains, the grinding and sieving of particles to equal<br />

size in Experiment 1 eliminates size as a driver of preference for<br />

conventional over organic food in the current experiment. Food<br />

texture (measured as endosperm hardness) was not found to differ<br />

between samples, making differences in this component unlikely<br />

to be driving the preference for conventional grain.<br />

Birds typically possess relatively few taste buds, 29,30 the majority<br />

of which are located on the posterior tongue and pharyngeal floor<br />

rather than in the front part of the mouth as in mammals. 31<br />

Therefore they have not historically been credited with a highly<br />

developed sense of taste. However, more recent studies have<br />

shown certain species of bird to respond to a number of taste<br />

stimuli, particularly bitter tastes in foodstuffs and solutions. 31,32<br />

However, the marked delay in formation of preference observed<br />

in the present study is more indicative of a post-ingestive effect<br />

of food consumption than of a simple taste preference, where<br />

the response would likely be much more rapid. Taste is unlikely,<br />

therefore, to be driving the preference for conventional wheat in<br />

the current experiment.<br />

Toxin and contaminant differences<br />

Aversive toxins and contaminants can deter feeding by interfering<br />

with nutrient utilisation (e.g. proteinase inhibitors, tannins)<br />

or by giving an unpleasant sensation. 33 As discussed in the<br />

‘Introduction’, there is the potential for four main classes of toxins<br />

and/or contaminants to be more abundant in organic produce and<br />

thus be driving the preference for conventional wheat observed<br />

in the current study. Levels of the relevant compounds have been<br />

measured and their likely role can now be assessed. It is important<br />

to note that none of the previous organic versus conventional food<br />

preference studies made any toxin/contaminant assessments.<br />

Environmental contamination<br />

Birds have been shown to be deterred by high levels of<br />

environmental contaminants such as heavy metals in foods. 34<br />

While differences in levels of such contamination have been<br />

reported in organic versus conventional foods, these differences<br />

can largely be explained by variations in environmental factors<br />

such as location, crop type and soil pH rather than by overall<br />

farming regime. 3 Two potential exceptions to this are cadmium<br />

and lead, shown to accumulate in lower and higher levels in<br />

organic produce respectively. 35 Chickens have been shown to<br />

detect these metals in foodstuffs, but only at very high levels and<br />

not at those typical of polluted regions. 34<br />

Cadmium and lead were not found at detectable levels in the<br />

samples used in the current study. Environmental contamination<br />

of this sort can therefore be discounted as a possible driving factor<br />

in conventional preference.<br />

Microbial contamination<br />

Magkos et al. 3 stated that the use of manures rather than<br />

chemical fertilisers contributes to an increased risk of microbial<br />

contamination in organic food. While manures are also used widely<br />

in conventional farming, this regime allows decontamination<br />

of the manure using irradiation and synthetic disinfectants<br />

to reduce microbial contamination, processes prohibited in<br />

organic farming. 3 However, the bulk of available evidence from<br />

comparative studies shows no significant differences in the<br />

bacterial status of organically and conventionally grown cereals<br />

(wheat and rye) and vegetables (carrots, spring mix, Swiss chard,<br />

salad vegetables). 3,36<br />

Neither E. coli nor Salmonella spp. were found in any of the<br />

samples used in the current study. Enterobacteriaceae were<br />

detected in small quantities (


Birds select conventional over organic wheat www.soci.org<br />

or water. One theory suggests that exclusion of the majority of<br />

artificial inputs in organic farming makes it an inherently more<br />

‘stressful’ regime than conventional farming and that organic<br />

foods will contain more of these secondary compounds as a<br />

consequence. While a number of these compounds have been<br />

shown to benefit animal and human health (e.g. polyphenolics<br />

as antioxidants), some (e.g. alkaloids and tannin-based phenolics)<br />

are potentially harmful to herbivores either through direct toxicity<br />

or through interference with nutrient assimilation. 28,37<br />

Increased interest in the antioxidant abilities of natural plant<br />

foods has led to a proliferation of studies concerning the levels<br />

of secondary metabolites in organic versus conventional foods.<br />

While results have been mixed, there appears to be a slight<br />

trend for certain organic foodstuffs to contain higher levels<br />

of these chemicals than conventional foodstuffs. However, this<br />

may not be the case for cereals. Studies of organic versus<br />

conventional wheat, for example, have not tended to detect<br />

increased levels of phenolics or stress-related metabolites in<br />

that grown organically. 17,38,39 Similarly, no difference was found<br />

between the phenolic content of organic and conventional oats. 40<br />

Added to this the fact that commercial cereals tend to be very<br />

low in defence chemicals such as tannins regardless of regime, 28<br />

differences in secondarymetabolite levels are unlikelyto be driving<br />

the preference for conventional food in the current study.<br />

Oxalic levels were used as a proxy for secondary chemical levels<br />

in the current experiment. While it would have been useful to carry<br />

out a series of tests on a range of stress markers and secondary<br />

chemicals (e.g. phytic acid, phenols, total antioxidant capacity),<br />

suitable methodologies could not be found. Oxalic acid levels have<br />

been shown to reflect stress levels in plants 39 and are, as such, likely<br />

to correlate with levels of other stress chemicals. No difference in<br />

oxalate level was detected between the organic and conventional<br />

samples used in the current experiment. Similar results have been<br />

found by other comparison studies, Langenkämper et al., 39 for<br />

example, finding no difference between organic and conventional<br />

wheat samples in terms of free radical-scavenging capacity, oxalic<br />

or phytic acid content.<br />

Pesticide residues<br />

Pesticide residues in foods have been found to deter feeding by<br />

a range of bird species. 15,16 However, as conventional wheat<br />

was preferred to organic wheat in the current study, either<br />

chemical residues in conventional food are too small to induce<br />

post-ingestional effects or the improved nutritional quality (i.e.<br />

increased protein level) of conventional food is such that it<br />

overrides the risk to health from other compounds.<br />

Mycotoxins<br />

Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by fungi in a<br />

similar way to defensive phytochemicals produced by vascular<br />

plants. 41 One of the most commonly detected mycotoxins in<br />

temperate areas, found extensively in cereal crops and animal<br />

feeds, is DON, a mycotoxin produced by Fusarium spp. fungi. 42,43<br />

IngestionofDONcanhaveanegativeaffectonthehealthofboth<br />

mammals and birds and, as a result, is often avoided in foods. Pigs,<br />

for example, reduced intake of food contaminated with naturally<br />

occurring DON even at relatively low levels (Around 1 mg kg −1 ). 11<br />

Similar observations have been made with rats and poultry, 12<br />

although major effects tend only to occur at concentrations<br />

higher than those observed with pigs (>10 mg kg −1 for poultry<br />

and >2mgkg −1 for rats/mice). 12,44,45<br />

There is much debate over whether the organic farming regime<br />

results in increased or decreased levels of DON in cereals. As<br />

organic crops do not receive any chemical antifungal treatments,<br />

it is predicted that they will be more susceptible to fungal attack<br />

and harbour higher levels of DON and other fungus-based toxins<br />

than conventional crops. Indeed, this has been found in a number<br />

of studies. 46,47 However, the converse may also be true. The high<br />

nitrogen inputs associated with conventional farming tend to<br />

weaken plant cell walls, increasing susceptibility to fungal attack<br />

and subsequent infection by DON. 3 Moreover, the increased tillage<br />

carried out on organic farms has been shown to decrease the<br />

incidence fungal attack. 3 Other authors have found no difference<br />

in DON levels between samples from the two regimes. 4,48–50<br />

While levels of DON in the wheat samples used in the current<br />

experiment were extremely varied, they did not vary in a manner<br />

compatible with DON driving preference for conventional wheat.<br />

That is, DON content of organic wheat was not consistently<br />

higher – one conventional sample used in Experiment 2, for<br />

example, had a DON level around four times that of the paired<br />

organic sample and remained preferred in the paired test. It is<br />

therefore unlikely that avoidance of high levels of DON in organic<br />

grain is driving the preference in the current experiment.<br />

Nutritional differences<br />

Birds have been shown to display appetites for both macronutrients<br />

(e.g. protein, fat) and micronutrients (e.g. vitamins, specific<br />

amino acids). Domestic chickens, for example, have been shown<br />

to be highly adept at selecting an optimal diet from a range of<br />

foodstuffs and to have specific appetites for individual dietary<br />

components. 13,25,33,51 It is possible, therefore, that levels of one or<br />

more important nutrients are enhanced in the conventional grain<br />

and are driving its preference in the current study.<br />

The most likely candidate in the current experiment is protein. In<br />

terms of essential nutrients, only protein levels were consistently<br />

different between foodstuffs – the conventional wheat samples<br />

contained significantly and consistently more protein than the<br />

organic wheat samples (Table 2). This is a common finding for<br />

a wide range of organic versus conventional foods 9,10 (including<br />

wheat 39 ) and is a consequence of differences in the levels of<br />

applied nitrogen fertiliser in each regime. 52,53 Applications of<br />

nitrogen on organic crops tend to be around 30% lower than<br />

those on conventional crops, 4 with availability of nitrogen to<br />

organic crops reduced further by the tendency of natural fertilisers<br />

(i.e. manures) to release nutrients more slowly than chemical<br />

fertilisers. 54 Thus, although our experiments are based on one<br />

food type (wheat), they may potentially generalise across to many<br />

other food types. Further work is required to confirm this.<br />

The results of Experiment 4 support the idea that protein<br />

is important in determining the choice of conventional wheat<br />

by birds, with birds selecting the higher-protein wheat from an<br />

otherwise matching pair (Fig. 4). One weakness of Experiment<br />

4 is that (owing to resource constraints) we did not measure<br />

components of the wheat samples other than protein. However,<br />

the results of the analysis of samples used in Experiments 1–3<br />

had allowed us, by Experiment 4, to discount the importance of<br />

the majority of other potential causal factors (e.g. particle size<br />

ruled out in Experiment 1, DON ruled out in Experiment 2, etc.).<br />

Therefore the selection being made by birds in Experiment 4 is<br />

likely to result from the higher protein content of the selected<br />

food rather than any other causal factor.<br />

Protein is an essential nutrient in the diet of all birds and<br />

mammals and is often limiting. This is especially the case for<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1867


1868<br />

animals that rely mainly on plant-based foodstuffs such as seeds,<br />

which typically contain very low levels of protein. 55 Perhaps as a<br />

result of this, birds and mammals have been shown to display very<br />

specific protein appetites – that is, be capable of selecting foods<br />

for their protein content alone. 13,14,25,33,56,57 Such preferences<br />

tend to be stronger when animals are subjected to some kind of<br />

stress (temperature, food/water shortage, etc.). 28 In birds, most<br />

protein detection studies have focused on commercial species<br />

such as chickens and quail, leaving this ability in the majority<br />

of small passerines largely understudied. Moreover, studies that<br />

have been carried out with passerines have mainly concerned<br />

detection of extreme protein differences rather than detection of<br />

differences of the magnitude observed in the current study (e.g.<br />

70% difference 58 vs 6–26% in the current study). Therefore the<br />

results of Experiment 4 are particularly noteworthy.<br />

As discussed previously, this preference for the higher-protein<br />

food of a pair is not in itself a novel finding. The novelty of our work<br />

is that differences in protein between conventional and organic<br />

food may explain the observed selection of the former, rather<br />

than the range of other differences between the two food types<br />

(discussed above).<br />

As this work was not carried out in a closed system (i.e. the birds<br />

were free to consume food ad libitum outwith the observation<br />

period), it is impossible to make any definitive statement on<br />

the mechanism behind selection, but our results do suggest a<br />

mechanism based more on nutrient selection rather than toxin<br />

or physical property aversion. Clearly there is a need to carry out<br />

further work in other taxa with similar protocols to those employed<br />

here to confirm the generality of our findings.<br />

Our work provides evidence that the preference reported by<br />

other studies for organic over conventional foods is questionable<br />

and that, at least in our series of experiments, the preference is<br />

actually reversed when other factors (such as length of study and<br />

nutritional content of foods) are considered. Our findings are likely<br />

to be of considerable interest to the wider scientific community<br />

and to the general public in the debate over the relative merits of<br />

consuming organic food.<br />

SUPPORTING INFORMATION<br />

Supporting information may be found in the online version of this<br />

article.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

MJW was funded by a BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship. AJM<br />

was funded by an NERC studentship and by CASE funding from<br />

the British Trust for Ornithology. We would like to thank the<br />

following for their input into this project: Tom Gray, Lowell Mills,<br />

Sarah McElhatton, Claudia Garratt, Nick Burton, Graeme Ruxton,<br />

Kirsten Brandt, Candy Rowe, Juliet Vickery, Anna McKenzie, Jeroen<br />

Minderman, and all the house-owners who allowed access to their<br />

gardens.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Willer H, Yussefi-Menzler M and Sorensen N (eds), The world of organic<br />

agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2008. Report for IFOAM,<br />

Bonn, Germany and FiBL, Frick, Switzerland (2008).<br />

2 Makatouni A, What motivates consumers to buy organic food in the<br />

UK? Br Food J 104:345–352 (2002).<br />

3 Magkos F, Arvaniti F and Zampelas A, Organic food: buying more<br />

safety or just peace of mind? A critical review of the literature. Crit<br />

Rev Food Sci 46:23–56 (2006).<br />

www.soci.org AJ McKenzie, MJ Whittingham<br />

4 Mäder P, Hahn D, Dubois D, Gunst L, Alfoldi T, Bergmann H, et al,<br />

Wheat quality in organic and conventional farming: results of a<br />

21 year field experiment. J Sci Food Agric 87:1826–1835 (2007).<br />

5 Mäder P, Pfiffner L, Niggli U, Balzar U, Balzar F, Plochberger K, et al,<br />

Effect of three farming systems (bio-dynamic, bio-organic,<br />

conventional) on yield and quality of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.<br />

var. esculenta L.)inasevenyearcroprotation.Acta Hort 330:10–31<br />

(1993).<br />

6 Plochberger K and Velmirov A, Are food preference tests with<br />

laboratory rats a proper method for evaluating nutritional quality.<br />

Biol Agric Hort 8:221–233 (1992).<br />

7 Plochberger K, Feeding experiments – a criterion for quality<br />

estimation of biologically and conventionally produced foods. Agric<br />

Ecosyst Environ 27:419–428 (1989).<br />

8 Leeson S and Summers JD, Metabolism and nutrition – dietary selfselection<br />

by turkeys. Poultry Sci 57:1579–1585 (1978).<br />

9 Benbrook C, Zhao X, Yáñez J, Davies N and Andrews P (eds), New<br />

evidence confirms the nutritional superiority of plant-based organic<br />

foods. State of Science Report, The Organic Center (2008).<br />

10 Woese K, Lange D, Boess C and Werner Bögl K, A comparison of<br />

organically and conventionally grown foods – results of a review of<br />

the relevant literature. J Sci Food Agric 74:281–293 (1997).<br />

11 Tiemann U and Danicke S, In vivo and in vitro effects of the mycotoxins<br />

zearalenone and deoxynivalenol on different non-reproductive and<br />

reproductive organs in female pigs: a review. Food Addit Contam<br />

24:306–314 (2007).<br />

12 Awad WA, Bohm J, Razzazi-Fazeli E and Zentek J, Effects of feeding<br />

deoxynivalenol contaminated wheat on growth performance,<br />

organ weights and histological parameters of the intestine of<br />

broiler chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 90:32–37 (2006).<br />

13 Forbes JM and Shariatmadari F, Diet selection for protein by poultry.<br />

World Poultry Sci J 50:7–24 (1994).<br />

14 Felton AM, Felton A, Lindenmayer DB and Foley WJ, Nutritional goals<br />

of wild primates. Funct Ecol 23:70–78 (2009).<br />

15 McKay HV, Prosser PJ, Hart ADM, Langton SD, Jones A, McCoy C, et al,<br />

Do wood-pigeons avoid pesticide treated cereal seed? J Appl Ecol<br />

36:283–296 (1999).<br />

16 Bennett RS and Prince HH, Influence of agricultural pesticides on food<br />

preference and consumption by ring-necked pheasants. J Wildl<br />

Manag 45:74–82 (1981).<br />

17 Zörb C, Langenkämper G, Betsche T, Niehaus K and Barsch A,<br />

Metabolite profiling of wheat grains (Tritium aestivum L.)<br />

from organic and conventional agriculture. J Agric Food Chem<br />

54:8301–8306 (2006).<br />

18 Wilson JD, Morris AJ, Arroyo BE, Clark SC and Bradbury RB, A review<br />

of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods<br />

of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural<br />

change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 73:13–30 (1999).<br />

19 Gillings S, Newson SE, Noble DG and Vickery JA, Winter availability<br />

of cereal stubbles attracts declining farmland birds and positively<br />

influences breeding population trends. Proc Biol Sci 272:733–739<br />

(2005).<br />

20 Moorcroft D, Whittingham MJ, Bradbury RB and Wilson WD, The<br />

selection of stubble fields by wintering granivorous birds reflects<br />

vegetation cover and food abundance. J Appl Ecol 39:535–547<br />

(2002).<br />

21 Wilson JD, Taylor R and Muirhead LB, Field use by farmland birds<br />

in winter: an analysis of field type preferences using resampling<br />

methods. Bird Study 43:320–332 (1996).<br />

22 R Core Development Team, R: a Language and Environment<br />

for Statistical Computing. [Online]. R Foundation for Statistical<br />

Computing, Vienna (2009). Available:http://www.R-project.org [13<br />

May 2010].<br />

23 Bates D, Maechler M and Dai B, LME4: Linear Mixed-effects Models<br />

Using S4 Classes. R Package Version 0.999375–28. [Online]. (2008).<br />

Available:http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/ [13 May 2010].<br />

24 Crawley MJ, The R Book (1st edn). Wiley, Chichester (2007).<br />

25 Rose SP and Kyriazakis I, Diet selection of pigs and poultry. Proc Nutr<br />

Soc 50:87–98 (1991).<br />

26 Kelrick MI, MacMahon JA, Parmenter RR and Sisson DV, Native seed<br />

preferences of shrub-steppe rodents, birds and ants: the<br />

relationships of seed attributes and seed use.Oecologia 68:327–337<br />

(1986).<br />

27 Frazer KI and McWilliams SR, Determinants of dietary preference in<br />

yellow-rumped warblers. Wilson Bull 114:243–248 (2002).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869


Birds select conventional over organic wheat www.soci.org<br />

28 Diaz M, Food choice by seed-eating birds in relation to seed chemistry.<br />

Comp Biochem Physiol A 113:239–246 (1996).<br />

29 Duncan CJ, Preference tests and the sense of taste in the pigeon<br />

(Columba livia Var. Gmelin). Anim Behav 8:54–60 (1960).<br />

30 Duncan CJ, The sense of taste in birds. Ann Appl Biol 48:409–414<br />

(1960).<br />

31 Werner SJ, Kimball BA and Provenza FD, Food color, flavor, and<br />

conditioned avoidance among red-winged blackbirds. Physiol<br />

Behav 93:110–117 (2008).<br />

32 Rowe C and Skelhorn J, Colour biases are a question of taste. Anim<br />

Behav 69:587–594 (2005).<br />

33 Murphy ME, Dietary complementation by wild birds: considerations<br />

for field studies. JBiosci19:355–368 (1994).<br />

34 Phillips CJC and Strojan ST, The ability of chickens to select nutritive<br />

and avoid toxic concentrations of heavy metals in feeds. JSustain<br />

Agric 30:31–45 (2007).<br />

35 Rossi F, Bertuzzi T, Comizzoli S, Turconi G, Roggi C, Pagani M, et al,<br />

Preliminary survey on composition and quality of conventional and<br />

organic wheat. Ital J Food Sci 4:355–366 (2006).<br />

36 Bourn D and Prescott J, A comparison of the nutritional value,<br />

sensory qualities, and food safety of organically and conventionally<br />

produced foods. Crit Rev Food Sci 42:1–34 (2002).<br />

37 Winter CK and Davis SF, Organic foods. J Food Sci 71:R117–R124<br />

(2006).<br />

38 ZuchowskiJ,KapustaI,SzajwajB,JonczykKandOleszekW,Phenolic<br />

acid content of organic and conventionally grown winter wheat.<br />

Cereal Res Commun 37:189–197 (2009).<br />

39 Langenkämper G, Zörb C, Seifert M, Mäder P, Fretzdorff B and<br />

Betsche T, Nutritional quality of organic and conventional wheat. J<br />

Appl Bot Food Qual 80:150–154 (2006).<br />

40 Dimberg LH, Gissen C and Nilsson J, Phenolic compounds in oat grains<br />

(Avena sativa L.) grown in conventional and organic systems. Ambio<br />

34:331–337 (2005).<br />

41 Yiannikouris A and Jouany JP, Mycotoxins in feeds and their fate in<br />

animals: a review. Anim Res 51:81–99 (2002).<br />

42 D’Mello JPF, Placinta CM and Macdonald AMC, Fusarium mycotoxins:<br />

a review of global implications for animal health, welfare and<br />

productivity. Anim Feed Sci Technol 80:183–205 (1999).<br />

43 Placinta CM, D’Mello JPF and Macdonald AMC, A review of worldwide<br />

contamination of cereal grains and animal feed with Fusarium<br />

mycotoxins. Anim Feed Sci Technol 78:21–37 (1999).<br />

44 Sprando RL, Collins TFX, Black TN, Olejnik N, Rorie JI and Eppley RM,<br />

Characterization of the effect of deoxynivalenol on selected male<br />

reproductive endpoints. Food Chem Toxicol 43:623–635 (2005).<br />

45 Khera KS, Arnold DL, Whalen C, Angers G and Scott PM, Vomitoxin (4deoxynivalenol)<br />

– effects on reproduction of mice and rats. Toxicol<br />

Appl Pharmacol 74:345–356 (1984).<br />

46 Malmauret L, Parent-Massin D, Hardy JL and Verger P, Contaminants<br />

in organic and conventional foodstuffs in France. FoodAdditContam<br />

19:524–532 (2002).<br />

47 Marx H, Gedek B and Kollarczik B, Comparative investigations on<br />

mycotoxicological status of alternatively and conventionally grown<br />

crops. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 201:83–86 (1995).<br />

48 Edwards SG, Fusarium mycotoxin content of UK organic and<br />

conventional wheat. Food Addit Contam A 26:496–506 (2009).<br />

49 Hoogenboom LAP, Bokhorst JG, Northolt MD, Van de Vijver LPL,<br />

Broex NJG, Mevius DJ, et al, Contaminants and microorganisms in<br />

Dutch organic food products: a comparison with conventional<br />

products. Food Addit Contam A 25:1195–1207 (2008).<br />

50 Vanova M, Klem K, Misa P, Matusinsky P, Hajslova J and Lancova K, The<br />

content of Fusarium mycotoxins, grain yield and quality of winter<br />

wheat cultivars under organic and conventional cropping systems.<br />

Plant Soil Environ 54:395–402 (2008).<br />

51 Newman RK and Sands DC, Dietary selection for lysine by the chick.<br />

Physiol Behav 31:13–19 (1984).<br />

52 Weston LA and Barth MM, Preharvest factors affecting postharvest<br />

quality of vegetables. HortScience 32:812–816 (1997).<br />

53 Shier NW, Kelman J and Dunson JW, A comparison of crude protein,<br />

moisture, ash and crop yield between organic and conventionally<br />

grown wheat. Nutr Rep Int 30:71–76 (1984).<br />

54 Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Philipps L, Hatch DJ, Cuttle SP,<br />

Rayns FW, et al, Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the<br />

supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use Manag 18:248–255 (2002).<br />

55 Murphy ME and Olson DB, Control of daily protein-intake by whitecrowned<br />

sparrows (WCS). Am Zool 31:A116–A116 (1991).<br />

56 White TCR, The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal<br />

ecology. Oecologia 33:71–86 (1978).<br />

57 Shariatmadari F and Forbes JM, Growth and food intake responses<br />

to diets of different protein contents and a choice between diets<br />

containing two concentrations of protein in broiler and layer strains<br />

of chickens. Br Poultry Sci 34:959–970 (1993).<br />

58 Musten B, Peace D and Anderson DH, Food-intake regulation in<br />

weanling rat – self-selection of protein and energy. J Nutr<br />

104:563–572 (1974).<br />

59 Schoener TW, Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst<br />

2:369–404 (1971).<br />

60 Emlen JM, The role of time and energy in food preferences. Am Nat<br />

100:611–617 (1966).<br />

61 Murphy ME and Pearcy SD, Dietary amino acid complementation as a<br />

foraging strategy for wild birds. Physiol Behav 53:689–698 (1993).<br />

62 Wolfson JL and Shearer G, Amino acid composition of grain protein of<br />

maize grown with and without pesticides and standard commercial<br />

fertilizers. Agron J 73:611–613 (1981).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1861–1869 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1869


1870<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 17 March 2010 Revised: 29 April 2010 Accepted: 30 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 3 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4027<br />

Determination of maize kernel hardness:<br />

comparison of different laboratory tests<br />

to predict dry-milling performance<br />

Massimo Blandino, a∗ Mattia Ciro Mancini, a Alessandro Peila, a Luca Rolle, b<br />

Francesca Vanara a and Amedeo Reyneri a<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Numerous foods are produced from maize, and grain hardness has been described to have an impact on grain<br />

end-use value, and in particular for dry-milling performance.<br />

RESULTS: Thirty-three samples of commercial hybrids have been analysed for test weight (TW), thousand-kernel weight<br />

(TKW), hard : soft endosperm ratio (H/S), milling time (MT) and total milling energy (TME) through the Stenvert hardness test,<br />

coarse : fine material ratio (C/F), break force (HF) and break energy (HWF) through the puncture test, floating test (FLT), kernel<br />

dimensions and sphericity (S), protein (PC), starch (SC), lipid (LC), ash (AC) content and amylose : amylopectin ratio (AS/AP).<br />

Total grit yield (TGY) has been obtained through a micromilling procedure and used to compare the efficiency of the tests to<br />

predict the dry-milling performance. TW, H/S, MT, TME, C/F, FLT, S, PC, SC and AS/AP were significantly correlated with each<br />

other. TW has been confirmed to be a simple estimator of grain hardness. Among the hardness tests, C/F was shown to be the<br />

best descriptor of maize milling ability, followed by FLT. A good correlation with TGY has also been observed with H/S, MT, TME<br />

and PC, while SC, S and AS/AP seem to play a minor role. The puncture test (HF and HWF) did not offer good indications on the<br />

impact of hardness on kernel grinding properties.<br />

CONCLUSION: This study can be considered as a contribution towards determining kernel properties which influence maize<br />

hardness measurement in relation to the end-use processing performance.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: maize kernel; dry-milling; hardness; endosperm; texture analysis<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Grain hardness is an important grain quality attribute that plays a<br />

role in the processing of cereal grains and in the end-use quality<br />

of cereal grain products. 1 Maize (Zea mays L.) is dry-milled to<br />

produce a range of flours and grits which are further processed<br />

for snacks, breakfast cereals and cooked or extruded products. 2,3<br />

Maize hardness has been shown to have a remarkable influence<br />

on the efficiency of the extraction yield and quality of the final<br />

product. 4 Maize for dry-milling and alkaline cooking processes<br />

should be hard, with large kernels and with pericarps and germs<br />

that are easy to remove during the process. 5,6 On the other hand,<br />

wet millers prefer soft maize grain, which usually requires less<br />

steeping and leads to a better starch–protein separation. 7<br />

The physical and biochemical aspects of maize hardness<br />

have been described in numerous publications. As far as the<br />

biochemical contribution to hardness in maize is concerned, both<br />

the protein and starch compositions have been associated with<br />

maize hardness. 8 Although the protein content comprises a lower<br />

proportion of the total kernel composition compared to starch,<br />

it would appear that it plays a significant role in influencing<br />

hardness, 3 and the variation in zein classes has, in particular,<br />

been linked to differences in hardness. 9 On the other hand, some<br />

studies 10 have not shown any link between grain protein content<br />

(PC) and hardness. Fox and Manley 11 suggest that the type of<br />

hardness test adopted may be influenced by protein, and some<br />

tests could be more influenced by the endosperm structure,<br />

thereby giving a stronger correlation with the protein content. At<br />

present very few studies have carried out multiple hardness tests<br />

and linked the result to PC.<br />

Among the physical tests, the ratio of the cross-sectional area<br />

from the hard to the soft (H/S ratio) endosperm, which can be<br />

measured with different techniques, 10 is probably the most direct<br />

way of measuring the fraction of kernel which influences drymilling<br />

processing performance to the greatest extent, although<br />

this method is not practical and is time consuming. 12 The other<br />

methods used to assess whole grain hardness are empirical and<br />

give an indirect measurement of the hardness that is generally<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Massimo Blandino, Department of Agriculture, Forestry<br />

and Land Management, University of Turin, via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095<br />

Grugliasco (TO), Italy. E-mail: massimo.blandino@unito.it<br />

a DepartmentofAgriculture,ForestryandLandManagement,UniversityofTurin,<br />

10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy<br />

b Dipartimento di Valorizzazione e Protezione delle Risorse Agroforestali – Food<br />

Technology sector, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Hardness methods for testing maize kernel www.soci.org<br />

correlated with H/S. The maize physical characteristics, kernel<br />

size and shape, weight and density, resistance to grinding or<br />

to abrasion and quantification of coarse and fine material after<br />

grinding and sieving have all been linked to hardness and its<br />

subsequent effects on processing. 11 Other indirect available tests<br />

toestimatemaizehardnessarebasedontheviscosityoftheground<br />

material (Rapid ViscoAnalyser) 13 or on near-infrared reflectance<br />

(NIR) and transmittance (NIT), both of which use whole kernels or<br />

kernels after the grinding step. 14 Most of these methods provide<br />

variableinformationontherangeofhardnessfromamaizesample.<br />

Moreover, in spite of the importance of hardness in dry-milling and<br />

the number of studies that have been published on this subject,<br />

there is still no generally accepted standard for the evaluation of<br />

maize kernel hardness and there is a need to evaluate new simple,<br />

rapid and reliable tests that could relate maize quality to product<br />

yields. 15<br />

At present there is little data concerning a single-kernel testing<br />

methodology for maize, whereas for wheat and barley the singlekernel<br />

characterization system (SKCS) has been shown to be<br />

suitable to determine hardness and provide an indication of<br />

quality. 16 One of the few methods that has the potential for<br />

measuring single maize kernels, similar to the SKCS for wheat,<br />

is the compression or puncture test. This test, already used for<br />

wheat 17 and other cereals, 18 relies on a resistance measurement<br />

of single kernels and involves a rod being pressed into the kernels.<br />

Shandera and Jackson 19 have used a single-kernel puncture<br />

texture analysis to discover the components and associative forces<br />

that are responsible for the endosperm structure of maize kernels,<br />

and Gaytán Martínezet al. 20 have studied the hardness of 21 maize<br />

cultivars in relation to texture, floating test, size and arrangement<br />

of starch granules within the endosperm.<br />

The objectives of this study were: (1) to increase the understanding<br />

of maize quality factor correlations and their relationship<br />

with the yield of dry-milling products; (2) to evaluate the range<br />

of variation of maize grain hardness that occurs in commercial<br />

maize hybrids that are normally cultivated in northern Italy; (3) to<br />

compare the parameters obtained from the puncture test with<br />

other standard tests estimating maize grain hardness.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Maize sample collection<br />

Thirteen commercial maize hybrids, all of which are normally cultivated<br />

in northern Italy and processed for dry-milling foodstuffs,<br />

were strip-test sown in five sites in 2007. The plot size was 100 m by<br />

eight rows, and the row spacing was 0.75 m. The geographic and<br />

main agronomic information concerning the experimental fields<br />

are reported in Table 1. The experimental fields were cultivated<br />

adopting the normal agronomic technique of each site. All 13<br />

Table 1. Geographic and main agronomic information about the experimental fields<br />

Site Location<br />

Geographic<br />

coordinates Soil a Altitude (m)<br />

hybrids were compared at site D, while five hybrids were selected<br />

at the other sites. At harvest, 100 ears were collected for each<br />

hybrid by hand from each strip at the end of maturity (moisture<br />

content of the grains between 20% and 26%) and shelled using<br />

an electric sheller. The kernels were mixed thoroughly to obtain a<br />

random distribution of the kernels and a 5 kg sample was slowly<br />

dried to ∼14% moisture and stored in a cool room at 7 ◦ Cand<br />

30% relative humidity until required. Storage of the kernels, equilibrated<br />

with the air in the cool room, resulted in a mean moisture<br />

content of 10.2% (range 9.2–10.9%) when tested. Before testing,<br />

all the samples were equilibrated to room temperature (25 ± 1 ◦ C)<br />

in paper bags for 48 h.<br />

The33maizesamples,whichweretestedforseveralphysicaland<br />

chemical properties, are listed in Tables 2 and 3. All the compared<br />

tests were performed only on typical, flat-shaped, whole kernels<br />

of the middle part of the ear, free from defects, which were<br />

selected visually from each sample. The compared tests and their<br />

abbreviations are summarized in Table 4.<br />

Analytical methods<br />

Moisture content and test weight (TW)<br />

The moisture content and TW of the stored and dried maize<br />

samples were determined by means of a grain analysis meter<br />

(Dickey-John GAC2000, Colombes, France) using the supplied<br />

programme. Calibration for moisture was checked using ovendrying<br />

techniques. The test weight was recorded as kg hL −1 and<br />

themoisturecontentasgkg −1 on the wet weight.<br />

Thousand-kernel weight (TKW)<br />

One hundred kernels were randomly collected from each sample<br />

and weighed using an electronic balance to assess the thousandkernel<br />

weight; this process was repeated three times. Thereafter,<br />

the mean value was used to calculated the TKW.<br />

Hard : soft endosperm ratio (H/S)<br />

The H/S endosperm ratio in the grain samples was estimated by<br />

sectioning the kernels and measuring the hard and softendosperm<br />

areas visible at the cut surface. 12 Dried kernels were sectioned just<br />

above the top of the embryo region using secateurs. The H/S ratios<br />

were calculated for 15 kernels from each sample by measuring<br />

the area of the cut surface and the soft endosperm region, using<br />

their scanned images and an image analysis system, with ImageJ<br />

software (version 1.38), which calculates the percentage of hard<br />

and soft endosperm in each kernel.<br />

Stenvert test<br />

This test was based on the method described by Stenvert 21 and<br />

Pomeranz et al. 22 A 20 g sample of kernel was ground using a<br />

Sowing<br />

date Harvest date<br />

A Carignano 44 ◦ 55 ′ N, 07 ◦ 40 ′ E Sandy loam, Typic Udifluvents 236 12 April 2007 12 October 2007<br />

B Chivasso 45 ◦ 14 ′ N, 7 ◦ 51 ′ E Sandy, Typic Hapludalfs 209 10 April2007 11 October 2007<br />

C Feletto 18 ′ N, 7 ◦ 45 ′ E Sandy–medium texture, Mollic Hapluquepts 275 9 April 2007 4 October 2007<br />

D Vigone 44 ◦ 51 ′ N, 07 ◦ 30 ′ E Sandy, Mollic Hapluquepts 256 29 March 2007 1 October 2007<br />

E Villafranca 44 ◦ 47 ′ N, 7 ◦ 33 ′ E Sandy–medium texture, Typic Udifluvents 253 4 April 4 2007 10 October 2007<br />

a USDA soil classification<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1871


1872<br />

www.soci.org M Blandino et al.<br />

Table 2. Total grit yield and results of hardness tests for all maize samples, ranked according to total grit yield<br />

Hybrid<br />

Site of<br />

cultivation<br />

Total grit<br />

yield<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Test<br />

weight<br />

(kg hL −1 )<br />

Thousand<br />

kernel<br />

weight (g)<br />

Hard/soft<br />

endosperm<br />

ratio<br />

Milling<br />

time a<br />

(s)<br />

Total<br />

energy a<br />

(J)<br />

C/F<br />

ratio a<br />

Break<br />

force b<br />

(N)<br />

Break<br />

energy b<br />

(mJ)<br />

Floating<br />

test<br />

HCP CECINA D 600 81.1 350 3.5 9.8 1366 1.4 253 119 2123<br />

Pioneer 3245 D 591 82.4 404 4.2 9.5 1379 1.3 266 119 2190<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 C 583 78.6 430 2.0 9.0 1344 1.2 193 75 2530<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 D 580 79.2 406 1.9 8.3 1352 1.2 236 104 2395<br />

Pioneer 3235 B 578 80.6 380 4.0 8.5 1130 1.4 219 88 2058<br />

Pioneer 3235 E 560 79.0 360 3.5 8.2 1151 1.1 222 96 2475<br />

Pioneer 3235 A 559 79.6 370 4.8 8.8 1235 1.1 225 94 2323<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 A 557 80.1 435 3.5 9.0 1343 1.2 220 93 2428<br />

Pioneer X1132R D 555 80.5 403 1.9 8.7 1353 1.3 242 101 2158<br />

Pioneer X1132R B 552 79.1 395 1.0 9.1 1117 1.3 214 87 2368<br />

Pioneer 3235 C 550 78.6 405 3.1 8.1 1293 1.3 203 87 2323<br />

Pioneer 3235 D 550 80.8 372 4.4 9.1 1388 1.3 278 135 2088<br />

KWS Kuadro D 548 77.8 325 0.9 9.1 1198 0.9 259 124 2415<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 B 542 79.8 410 3.7 8.9 1074 1.2 212 87 2343<br />

KWS Kermess D 535 77.2 353 1.6 8.1 1149 1.1 215 91 2425<br />

Syngenta NX6413 D 534 80.2 391 2.3 8.5 1216 1.1 300 155 2528<br />

Pioneer X1132R A 532 78.6 390 3.0 8.5 1226 1.2 198 77 2175<br />

HCP DORIA D 532 80.0 313 3.2 10.2 1520 1.3 233 98 2110<br />

Pioneer X1132R C 526 75.3 395 3.0 8.8 1151 1.0 162 60 2555<br />

Pioneer X1132R E 526 76.7 385 1.3 7.8 1270 1.0 148 56 2605<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 E 522 78.8 380 2.1 9.1 1211 1.1 198 80 2600<br />

Pioneer PR34G44 D 501 79.4 444 2.5 8.4 1259 1.0 211 86 2425<br />

Syngenta NX7034 D 493 76.1 421 1.4 8.9 1065 1.0 277 145 2653<br />

Dekalb Tevere E 484 73.3 370 1.2 6.7 1037 0.8 180 78 3225<br />

Dekalb Tevere B 478 75.2 385 0.8 7.9 1129 0.8 190 79 2890<br />

Syngenta NX7234 E 475 74.1 359 0.4 5.5 989 0.8 145 52 2775<br />

Dekalb Tevere D 448 73.1 388 0.4 7.8 1185 0.7 232 109 2835<br />

Dekalb Tevere A 444 75.6 385 0.3 7.2 1193 0.8 229 103 2935<br />

Syngenta NX7234 B 441 75.6 355 0.8 6.7 1068 0.8 184 75 2765<br />

Syngenta NX7234 A 416 75.1 380 0.6 6.9 1117 0.7 177 70 2775<br />

Syngenta NX7234 D 410 75.4 358 0.9 7.6 1029 0.7 208 91 3040<br />

Dekalb Tevere C 408 74.3 375 0.3 7.1 1084 0.6 199 81 3195<br />

Syngenta NX7234 C 404 73.5 365 0.2 6.2 939 0.5 178 71 3230<br />

Average 516 77.7 383 2.1 8.2 1199 1.0 215 93 2544<br />

Coefficient of variation (%) 11.1 3.3 7.5 66.5 12.8 11.1 23.6 16.9 25.6 13.2<br />

a Parameters that refer to the Stenvert hardness test.<br />

b Parameters that refer to the puncture test.<br />

Culatti micro hammer mill (Labtech Essa, Belmont, Australia) fitted<br />

with a 2 mm aperture particle screen at a speed of 2500 rpm when<br />

empty. The laboratory mill was equipped with a computerized<br />

data-logging system to log the instantaneous electric power<br />

consumption during the milling test, as reported by Mestres<br />

et al. 23 and Li et al. 12 Total milling energy (TME) and the milling<br />

time (MT) taken to completely mill the 20 g kernel sample, were<br />

determined from these data. These parameters were determined<br />

three times for each maize sample.<br />

Particle size index<br />

A 20 g kernel sample was ground using a Culatti micro-hammer<br />

mill fitted with a 2 mm aperture particle screen and was sieved into<br />

two fractions using a Ro-Tap testing sieve shaker (WS Tyler Co.,<br />

Cleveland, OH, USA) with 8 in. diameter brass sieves. Sieve meshes<br />

of 500 and 700 µm were chosen to represent the most common<br />

product obtained in the milling industry: prime or large grits<br />

(700–2000 µm) and fine meal (


Hardness methods for testing maize kernel www.soci.org<br />

Table 3. Chemical and physical characteristics for all maize samples, ranked according to total grit yield<br />

Hybrid<br />

Site of<br />

cultivation<br />

Moisture<br />

content<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Protein<br />

content<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Starch<br />

content<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Lipid<br />

content<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Ash<br />

content<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Amylose/<br />

amylopectin<br />

rate<br />

Kernel<br />

length<br />

(mm)<br />

Kernel<br />

width<br />

(mm)<br />

Kernel<br />

depth<br />

(mm) Sphericity<br />

HCP CECINA D 103 105 613 56 16 0.27 12.9 8.2 4.5 0.60<br />

Pioneer 3245 D 102 102 638 48 15 0.28 13.0 8.8 4.7 0.62<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 C 104 104 629 58 17 0.34 13.4 9.6 4.5 0.62<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 D 98 102 623 49 16 0.25 13.5 9.1 4.5 0.61<br />

Pioneer 3235 B 109 109 641 47 17 0.32 12.8 8.9 4.3 0.62<br />

Pioneer 3235 E 104 101 670 40 16 0.32 12.5 8.8 4.4 0.63<br />

Pioneer 3235 A 105 116 610 49 17 0.33 12.7 9.0 4.3 0.62<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 A 101 109 602 55 17 0.34 12.9 9.1 4.4 0.62<br />

Pioneer X1132R D 92 107 615 52 17 0.29 13.5 8.7 4.6 0.60<br />

Pioneer X1132R B 109 110 635 52 18 0.32 13.4 8.8 4.5 0.60<br />

Pioneer 3235 C 105 114 612 57 19 0.31 12.9 8.9 4.5 0.62<br />

Pioneer 3235 D 99 113 618 47 16 0.35 12.8 9.0 4.6 0.63<br />

KWS Kuadro D 104 97 638 41 15 0.30 13.3 7.5 4.3 0.57<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 B 104 99 635 49 16 0.30 12.9 9.1 4.6 0.63<br />

KWS Kermess D 92 93 656 31 14 0.28 13.6 8.1 4.3 0.57<br />

Syngenta NX6413 D 104 97 646 47 16 0.33 12.4 8.8 5.2 0.67<br />

Pioneer X1132R A 99 102 629 55 17 0.35 13.3 8.6 4.4 0.60<br />

HCP DORIA D 103 115 608 51 17 0.31 13.2 8.8 4.1 0.59<br />

Pioneer X1132R C 104 106 644 53 18 0.35 14.0 8.5 4.5 0.58<br />

Pioneer X1132R E 98 113 642 55 19 0.35 13.3 8.6 4.6 0.61<br />

Dekalb DKC 6309 E 103 110 639 46 17 0.34 13.5 9.0 4.4 0.60<br />

Pioneer PR34G44 D 95 97 640 45 16 0.26 13.8 9.1 4.7 0.61<br />

Syngenta NX7034 D 99 97 639 48 16 0.32 13.1 9.3 5.1 0.65<br />

Dekalb Tevere E 108 88 664 47 16 0.28 13.4 8.6 4.3 0.59<br />

Dekalb Tevere B 104 92 649 49 16 0.27 13.2 9.1 4.2 0.60<br />

Syngenta NX7234 E 102 83 672 43 15 0.28 13.6 8.6 4.1 0.57<br />

Dekalb Tevere D 96 91 639 55 16 0.24 13.8 9.0 4.4 0.59<br />

Dekalb Tevere A 99 94 641 50 16 0.26 13.1 9.0 4.2 0.60<br />

Syngenta NX7234 B 103 81 693 41 15 0.26 13.7 9.0 4.0 0.57<br />

Syngenta NX7234 A 108 94 648 46 15 0.29 14.1 8.8 4.1 0.57<br />

Syngenta NX7234 D 99 86 657 47 14 0.24 14.1 8.9 4.0 0.56<br />

Dekalb Tevere C 104 94 644 52 17 0.27 13.4 8.9 4.3 0.60<br />

Syngenta NX7234 C 106 91 672 52 16 0.25 14.1 8.9 4.1 0.57<br />

Average 102 100 639 49 16 0.30 13.3 8.8 4.4 0.6<br />

Coefficient of variation (%) 4.3 9.5 3.2 11.7 7.3 11.9 3.4 4.2 6.2 4.2<br />

small cylinder into the tissue and measuring the evolution of<br />

stress–strain. It is assumed to measure a mix of compression<br />

(under the plunger) and shearing. 25 Hardness was expressed as<br />

the break force (HF) evaluated in newtons and the break energy<br />

(HWF) evaluated in megajoules. HF corresponds to the resistance<br />

of kernels to the penetration of the probe, while HWF measures<br />

the area beneath the deformation curve between force values 0<br />

and HF. 26 The data were all acquired at 400 Hz and using Texture<br />

ExpertExceed software (Texture Technologies, Scarsdale, NY, USA).<br />

Figure 1 shows a typical force–time deformation curve of texture<br />

analysis, obtained from the kernel puncture test.<br />

Floating test (FLT)<br />

This test was used to assess the density of the maize grain; the<br />

number of floating kernels (floaters) in a variable density solution<br />

was recorded. The method that was adopted is a modification of<br />

that proposed by Wichser. 27 100 mL tetrachloroethylene (density<br />

1.62 g mL −1 ) and 40 mL petroleum ether (density 0.653 g mL −1 )<br />

were added to an Erlenmeyer flask, and the solution density<br />

obtained was 1.34 g mL −1 . A sample of 50 kernels was put<br />

into Erlenmeyer flasks; 5 mL petroleum ether was gradually<br />

added to the solution and the density of the solution was<br />

decreased until there were no kernels left floating. The number<br />

of kernels floating at each addition of petroleum ether to the<br />

solution was recorded and a precipitation curve was obtained.<br />

FLT measures the area beneath the precipitation curve and this<br />

parameter is adversely correlated to the density of the kernels.<br />

These parameters were determined three times for each maize<br />

sample.<br />

Kernel dimensions and sphericity (S)<br />

The spatial dimensions of 50 kernels of each hybrid were calculated<br />

by measuring the average length (L), width (W) anddepth(D) of<br />

the whole kernels using a 0.1 mm precise gauge. These data were<br />

used to calculate S by means of the following formula: 22<br />

�<br />

Volume of solid<br />

S =<br />

Volume of circumscribed sphere<br />

� 1/3<br />

�<br />

LWD<br />

=<br />

L<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

� 1/3<br />

1873


1874<br />

Table 4. List of abbreviations of parameters analysed on maize kernel<br />

Abbreviation Parameter<br />

TGY Total grit yield<br />

TW Test weight<br />

TKW Thousand-kernel weight<br />

H/S Hard/soft endosperm ratio<br />

MT Milling time<br />

TME Total milling energy<br />

C/F Coarse/fine ratio<br />

HF Break force<br />

HWF Break energy<br />

FLT Floating test<br />

L Kernel length<br />

W Kernelwidth<br />

D Kernel depth<br />

S Sphericity<br />

PC Protein content<br />

SC Starch content<br />

OC Oil content<br />

AC Ash content<br />

AS/AP Amylose/amylopectin rate<br />

MT, TME: parameters that refer to Stenvert hardness test.<br />

HF, HWF: parameters that refer to puncture test.<br />

Figure 1. A typical force–time deformation curve, obtained from the<br />

texture analysis puncture test of maize kernels.<br />

The sphericity values range from 0 (no three-dimensional object)<br />

to 1 (perfect sphere). The closer the sphericity is to unity, the more<br />

spherical the kernel; conversely, the lower the sphericity, the flatter<br />

the kernel.<br />

Kernel composition<br />

A grab sample of approximately 300 g of maize was ground<br />

to a fine flour using a Foss Tecator Cyclotec 1093 sample<br />

mill fitted with a 1 mm screen. The protein (PC), starch (SC),<br />

oil (OC) and ash (AC) contents were estimated by nearinfrared<br />

reflectance spectroscopy, using a NIRsystems 6500<br />

monochromator instrument (Foss-NIRsystems, Silver Spring, MD,<br />

www.soci.org M Blandino et al.<br />

USA) that was calibrated for wet chemical methods. The protein,<br />

starch, oil and ash contents were adjusted to 15% moisture content<br />

using the NIR-predicted moisture content of the ground grain.<br />

The amylose : amylopectin ratio (AS/AP)of the maize kernels was<br />

estimated using a Megazyme commercial assay kit (Megazyme<br />

International Ireland Ltd, Wicklow, Ireland), based on the concanavalin<br />

A precipitation procedure. 28<br />

Micromilling procedure<br />

According to Yuan and Flores, 29 a micromilling procedure was<br />

used to process the maize grain sample and provide an index<br />

of the efficiency of the quality tests for dry-milling processing.<br />

Twenty intact, whole kernels were soaked in distilled water for<br />

1 h at room temperature (25 ± 1 ◦ C) and the bran and germ<br />

were removed manually with a scalpel. The procedure was always<br />

performedbythesametrainedresearchertoensureastandardized<br />

determination and avoid subjective determination. The obtained<br />

endosperms were conditioned in an oven at 40 ◦ Cfor48h,and<br />

were then ground and sieved using the same procedure as the<br />

particle size index test. The total grit yield (TGY) corresponded<br />

to the percentage of the fraction from 2.000 to 700 µm, which<br />

was chosen to represent the main products obtained in the<br />

conventional dry-milling industry. 6<br />

Thetotalgrityieldwasexpressedasapercentageofthetotaldrymilled<br />

fractions (g kg −1 ). Considering that this procedure achieved<br />

a good separation of the bran, germ and endosperm, 29 and<br />

that the grounding operations were conducted under standard<br />

conditions for all the compared maize samples, micromilling<br />

can be considered to provide a good index of dry-milling<br />

performance.<br />

Statistical analyses<br />

When present, replicates were averaged. The coefficient of variation<br />

(CV) was calculated for each parameter. Simple correlation<br />

coefficients were then obtained for all the quality factors relative<br />

to one another (SPSS, Version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL,<br />

USA).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

In Tables 2 and 3 the data for each analysed parameter are shown<br />

for each maize sample, ranked for grit yield. Table 5 reports<br />

the correlation coefficients and their significance between the<br />

parameters of maize kernels analysed.<br />

Although the compared maize hybrids are ordinary commercial<br />

hybrids that are normally cultivated in northern Italy,<br />

their composition varied in starch (602–693 g kg −1 ), protein<br />

(81–116 g kg −1 ), lipid (31–58 g kg −1 ) and ash (14–19gkg −1 )<br />

content and the relative amounts of amylose and amylopectin<br />

(0.24–0.35). As expected, the starch (SC) and protein (PC) contents<br />

were negatively correlated with each other (r =−0.79), while<br />

PC was positive correlated with lipid (0.43) and ash (0.71). The<br />

amylose : amylopectin ratio (AS/AP) was positively correlated with<br />

PC (0.68) and AC (0.56), while a negative relationship was observed<br />

for SC (−0.49).<br />

TGY was between 404 and 600 g kg −1 . Although the evaluated<br />

hybrids are normally used in food processes, they showed remarkable<br />

differences in their aptitude to dry-milling transformation.<br />

Among the compared hybrids, HCP Cecina, Pioneer 3245, Dekalb<br />

DKC 6309, Pioneer X1132R and Pioneer 3235 showed the highest<br />

grit yield.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878


Hardness methods for testing maize kernel www.soci.org<br />

Table 5. Correlation matrix between the physical and chemical parameters tested on the maize kernels a<br />

Parameter TGY TW TKW H/S MT TME C/F HF HWF FLT L W D S PC SC OC AC<br />

TW 0.84∗∗ TKW 0.19 0.19<br />

H/S 0.75∗∗ 0.80∗∗ 0.15<br />

MT 0.74∗∗ 0.79∗∗ 0.11 0.68∗∗ TME 0.66∗∗ 0.72∗∗ −0.35 0.56∗∗ 0.72∗∗ C/F 0.92∗∗ 0.91∗∗ 0.20 0.78∗∗ 0.79∗∗ 0.72∗∗ HF 0.40∗ 0.57∗∗ 0.03 0.37∗ 0.59∗∗ 0.44∗∗ 0.43∗ HWF 0.30 0.44∗∗ 0.01 0.27 0.50∗∗ 0.35∗ 0.32 0.98∗∗ FLT −0.85∗∗ −0.89∗∗ −0.08 −0.78∗∗ −0.77∗∗ −0.70∗∗ −0.93∗∗ −0.45∗∗ −0.33<br />

L −0.60∗∗ −0.60∗∗ −0.06 −0.61∗∗ −0.44∗ −0.36∗ 0.55∗∗ −0.55∗∗ −0.53∗∗ 0.48∗∗ W −0.13 0.01 0.61∗∗ 0.07 −0.05 0.02 −0.30 −0.04 −0.07 0.13 −0.05<br />

D 0.46∗∗ 0.46∗∗ 0.57∗∗ 0.35∗ 0.47∗∗ 0.30 0.43∗ 0.57∗∗ 0.60∗∗ −0.35∗ −0.48∗∗ 0.16<br />

S 0.51∗∗ 0.56∗∗ 0.52 0.54∗∗ 0.45∗∗ 0.34 0.50∗∗ 0.57∗∗ 0.56∗∗ −0.39∗ −0.80 0.45∗∗ 0.82∗∗ PC 0.70∗∗ 0.69∗∗ 0.17 0.68∗∗ 0.73∗∗ 0.71∗∗ 0.76∗∗ 0.24 0.14 −0.72∗∗ −0.46∗∗ 0.05 0.35∗ 0.44∗∗ SC −0.58∗∗ −0.63∗∗ −0.27 −0.56∗∗ −0.73∗∗ −0.78∗∗ −0.67∗∗ −0.43∗ −0.34 0.63∗∗ 0.39∗ −0.08 −0.34 −0.40∗ −0.79∗∗ OC 0.12 0.09 0.40∗ 0.12 0.22 0.34 0.18 −0.08 −0.09 −0.07 −0.07 0.35∗ 0.20 0.25 0.43∗ −0.55∗∗ AC 0.34 0.22 0.38∗ 0.29 0.27 0.31 −0.37∗ −0.23 −0.28 −0.27 −0.24 0.27 0.24 0.34 0.71∗∗ −0.49∗∗ 0.71∗∗ AS/AP 0.51∗∗ 0.42∗ 0.17 0.52∗∗ 0.47∗∗ 0.31 0.50∗∗ 0.05 0.03 −0.48∗∗ −0.48 0.06 0.40∗ 0.49∗∗ 0.68∗∗ −0.37∗ 0.22 0.56∗∗ J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

a Abbreviations: see Table 4.<br />

The data reported in the table are Pearson product–moment correlation coefficients. ∗ Correlation significant at P ≤ 0.05; ∗∗ correlation significant at P ≤ 0.01.<br />

1875


1876<br />

Considering the compared tests and parameters recorded,<br />

TGY was shown to be significantly correlated with C/F (0.92),<br />

FLT (−0.85), TW (0.84), H/S (0.74), MT (0.74), PC (0.70), TME (0.66),<br />

L(−0.60), SC (−0.58), S (0.51), AL/AP (0.51), D (0.46) and HF (0.40),<br />

as reported in Table 5.<br />

Particle size index<br />

The correlation matrix shows that the percentage repartition into<br />

coarse (C) and fine (F) material after standard milling (C/F) is the<br />

best descriptor of maize milling ability. The data obtained from<br />

our study showed that the C/F ratio was closely correlated with the<br />

H/S ratio (0.78). Although the H/S ratio ranged from 0.2 to 4.8 and<br />

exhibited a CVof 67, while the C/F ratio ranged from 0.5 to 1.4 with a<br />

CVof26,thelatterisaconsiderablylesstime-consuminglaboratory<br />

test compared to quantification of the hard and soft fractions in<br />

the endosperm. Moreover, considering that the differences in<br />

the germ and pericarp content among commercial maize hybrids<br />

are generally low, the C/F ratio is also an obvious descriptor of<br />

maize milling performance. 30,31 This test is a good estimator of<br />

grain hardness, since it can measure objectively and accurately<br />

and give an indirect but clear evaluation of the hard (H) and soft<br />

(S) fractions. In fact, coarse material is mostly obtained by milling<br />

the hard endosperm fraction. 32<br />

Floating test<br />

The FLT was significantly related to the physical kernel characteristics<br />

obtained from the other tests (C/F, TW, H/S, MT, TME, HF), thus<br />

confirming the data reported by Pomeranz et al. 24 Furthermore,<br />

this test was less affected by the shape of the kernels than the other<br />

tests, e.g. TW and H/S, which showed a higher correlation with<br />

kernel sphericity. FLT was highly and negatively correlated with<br />

PC and AS/AP, while a direct relationship was observed with SC.<br />

The observed CV of the floating test was 13. Considering the<br />

capacity of the FLT to discriminate maize samples according to<br />

hardness, quantification of the precipitation curve in a variabledensity<br />

solution, applied in our experiment, seems to be more<br />

efficient than the simple percentage of floaters observed in a<br />

standard solution. 27,33 This study confirms that kernel density,<br />

measured by means of the FLT, is a good descriptor of kernel<br />

hardness and of maize milling performance. 10,33<br />

Test weight<br />

Of all the compared tests, TW showed the third strongest correlation<br />

with TGY (0.84). It also demonstrated a close relationship<br />

with all the other tests used to estimated grain hardness (C/F, FLT,<br />

H/S, MT, TME, HF, HWF). On the other hand, no correlation was<br />

found between these parameters and TKW. This result confirms<br />

that kernel hardness does not depend on kernel weight alone but<br />

also on its shape. TW is correlated negatively with kernel length<br />

(−0.60) and positively with kernel depth (0.46) and increases with<br />

the sphericity of grain (0.56).<br />

The collected data confirm that TW is a simple estimator of grain<br />

hardness 12 and, since it is widely used, it is the first parameter that<br />

needs to be considered to evaluate the dry-milling performance<br />

of maize hybrids. On the other hand, TKW was not able to provide<br />

effective information on grain hardness, thus confirming data<br />

reported by Pomeranz et al. 24 and Mestres et al. 10<br />

H/S ratio<br />

Compared to C/F, FLT and TW, the ratio of the cross-sectional<br />

area of hard and soft endosperm (H/S) has demonstrated a lower<br />

www.soci.org M Blandino et al.<br />

correlation coefficient with TGY (0.74). This parameter instead<br />

showed the highest CV of all the methods (66.5), thus confirming<br />

that H/S ratio is an efficient kernel hardness test, which is also able<br />

to discriminate the kernels from ordinary commercial hybrids. 29<br />

The correlation matrix shows a close correlation between H/S<br />

and other physical kernel characteristics, such as test weight (0.80),<br />

FLT (−0.78) and MT (0.68). Considering the chemical composition<br />

of the kernel, H/S was shown to be significantly related to PC (0.68)<br />

and AS/AP (0.52). This parameter was also directly related to kernel<br />

sphericity (0.54): the thickness of the hard endosperm region is<br />

higher in rounder kernels than in flat ones. The H/S ratio increases<br />

with an increase in kernel depth and a reduction in kernel length,<br />

confirming data reported by Mestres et al. 10 and Pomeranz et al. 22<br />

The digital image processing software used in this experiment<br />

for the estimation of H/S ratio allows simpler and more accurate<br />

measurements of the hard and soft areas of the cross-section to be<br />

obtainedthanwiththeothermethods,suchasquantificationusing<br />

camera lucida drawings, or enlarged photographs, 34,35 which are<br />

subjective and require sophisticated equipment and particular<br />

expertise. However, this method has been confirmed to be time<br />

consuming and not practical for very large numbers of samples,<br />

although it is the most direct measurement of the proportion<br />

of hard endosperm available in maize kernels, since the internal<br />

endosperm tissue is viewed directly.<br />

Stenvert test<br />

As reported by Li et al., 12 the parameters obtained using the<br />

Stenvert hardness test – milling time (MT) and total milling energy<br />

(TME) – were highly correlated with H/S. Of these two parameters,<br />

MT appears to be a better descriptor of maize grain hardness<br />

than TME, since the correlation with H/S is closer (0.68 and 0.56<br />

for MT and TME, respectively) and the CV is moderately higher<br />

(12.8 and 11.1 respectively). In the same way, MT showed a higher<br />

correlation with TGY than TME. However, TME could provide more<br />

objective information, since the data are not recorded by an<br />

operator, but through a computerized data-logging system which<br />

logs the instantaneous electric power consumption during the<br />

milling test.<br />

Kernel composition<br />

In this experiment, PC was significantly correlated with several<br />

parameters obtained from tests used to estimate grain hardness,<br />

thus confirming the data reported by Dorsey-Redding et al. 36 and<br />

Lee et al., 15 but was also correlated with the shape of the kernel.<br />

Round kernels were higher in protein content than flat kernels,<br />

as reported by Pomeranz et al. 22 Moreover, kernels with a high<br />

protein content have been confirmed to have a higher grain<br />

density (FLT) and produce more total grits. 29<br />

The dry-milling yield and maize kernel hardness-associated<br />

properties measured in this study were negatively related to SC<br />

but positively associated with AS/AP. These data are consistent<br />

with previous studies. 3,37<br />

Dombrink-Kurtzam and Knutson 38 suggest that increased<br />

amounts of amylose may result in increased compressibility of<br />

the starch granules in the hard endosperm, which leads to a<br />

compactedstateandapolygonalshape,whileagreaterproportion<br />

of amylopectin, potentially more crystalline, could lead to a less<br />

compressible and softer endosperm.<br />

No significant correlations were observed between TGY and<br />

OC or AS. Significant correlations between the dry-milling<br />

performance of maize hybrids and ash or lipid content have<br />

been reported by Mestres et al. 10 and Dorsey-Redding et al. 36<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878


Hardness methods for testing maize kernel www.soci.org<br />

Sphericity (S)<br />

Although all the tests in our study have only been performed on<br />

the typical flat-shaped whole kernels of the middle part of the<br />

maize ear to reduce variability among maize samples, a positive<br />

correlation between S and TGY was observed. Mestres et al. 10<br />

reported that the dry-milling yield of maize hybrids could also be<br />

predicted on the basis of sphericity, although this parameter was<br />

not significantly correlated with kernel vitreousness. Moreover, in<br />

this dataset a significant correlation coefficient was established<br />

between S and the various hardness parameters. These data<br />

confirm that kernels with higher sphericity are generally higher<br />

in flint-like characteristics than flatter kernels 22 ,althoughstudies<br />

exist that report a lower hardness ratio for round kernels than for<br />

flat ones. 39<br />

Texture analysis<br />

As far as the puncture test is concerned, only break force (HF) was<br />

correlated, though weakly, to TGY (0.40), while the relationship<br />

between TGY and break energy (HWF) was not significant. Both<br />

these parameters – HF and HWF – were correlated with TW, MT<br />

and TME, and HF showed a higher correlation coefficient than<br />

HWF for all the relationships with these parameters. Only HF was<br />

significantly correlated with H/S (0.37), C/F (0.43) and FLT (−0.45).<br />

In our experiment, HF and HWF were not significantly correlated<br />

with PC or AS/AP, while a negative correlation was observed<br />

between HF and SC. Moreover, both HF and HWF were highly<br />

correlated with S (0.57 and 0.56, respectively) and in particular with<br />

D (0.57 and 0.60 respectively), while they were not significantly<br />

related to PC. These observations suggest that HF and HWF<br />

are probably affected more by the kernel shape than by their<br />

endosperm composition: kernels with a higher sphericity, as a<br />

consequence of a greater depth, present a higher physical and<br />

structural resistance to penetration to the probe than do flatter<br />

kernels. The moderate correlation observed between HF and HWF<br />

with other kernel hardness parameters, such as TW, MT, TME, H/S,<br />

C/F and FLT, and between HF and GY, is probably an indirect effect<br />

of the relationship that exists between these parameters and the<br />

sphericity of kernels. In the study conducted by Gaytán Martínez<br />

et al., 20 the resistance obtained from a puncture test through<br />

texture analysis showed a better correlation with the floating test<br />

(−0.74), compared to our experiment. In the same study, since a<br />

positive correlation (0.59) was also observed between the grain<br />

resistance to a puncture test and starch granule size, the authors<br />

suggested an important effect of the structural arrangement of<br />

the starch granules within the endosperm structure: soft maize<br />

starch granules are predominantly spherical and loosely packed<br />

within a protein matrix, while hard maize has mostly polygonal and<br />

densely packed starch granules. A similar result has been obtained<br />

on wheat by Greffeuille et al., 17 who suggested that greater<br />

starch–protein matrix adhesion in hard grains compared to soft<br />

ones could explain the greater energy necessary to break the grain.<br />

In their study, Shandera and Jackson 19 compared different<br />

solvents and heat treatments on kernels accurately selected,<br />

according to dimension, from two maize hybrids. The authors<br />

underlined that kernel shape, surface area and thickness could<br />

have an important effect on textural testing.<br />

Since the results of the puncture test on single kernels have<br />

shown a very weak correlation with TGY, this test appears to<br />

be an inadequate predictor of kernel hardness, when this kernel<br />

characteristic is used to distinguish maize genotypes according<br />

to their dry-milling behaviour and performance. On the other<br />

hand, if hardness is only considered for the mechanical resistance<br />

of the whole grain to applied deformation, 40 this test could<br />

provide information on the power required to break kernels during<br />

processing although, regarding dry-milling, correlation with the<br />

energy required to mill grain (TME) was moderate.<br />

This method could be used to clearly show the difference in<br />

maize endosperm texture when applied to a product which is<br />

able to resist compression forces without completely breaking.<br />

For example, the application of this method to maize grits or meal<br />

extrudates has shown a clear relationship between the obtained<br />

force–deformation curve and the porosity and composition of the<br />

product tested. 41,42<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

This research confirms that the dry-milling behaviour of maize<br />

is clearly influenced by the various physical and chemical<br />

characteristics of the kernel, which combine to determine its<br />

hardness. First, the results have indicated the significance of test<br />

weight as an index of maize hardness. The test weight has been<br />

confirmed to be a simple estimator of grain hardness and is the<br />

first parameter to consider in evaluating the grain hardness of<br />

a maize hybrid. Among the hardness tests, C/F has been shown<br />

to be the best descriptor of maize milling ability, followed by<br />

FLT. Since both these indicators also show a close relationship<br />

with the proportion of hard endosperm in the kernel and a good<br />

capacity to discriminate among commercial maize hybrids, these<br />

tests could be the most interesting to characterize maize lots for<br />

their dry-milling performance. A good correlation with total grit<br />

yield after dry milling has also been observed for H/S, MT, TME<br />

and PC, while SC, S and AS/AP seem to play a minor role. Puncture<br />

test did not provide good indications concerning the impact of<br />

hardness on kernel grinding properties.<br />

At present no quality criteria are universally recognized by maize<br />

kernel end users. In fact the hybrids in this study, which were<br />

chosen from the varieties normally cultivated and processed in<br />

dry-milling processes, exhibited remarkable differences in total grit<br />

yield. A forthcoming objective will be to adapt commercial maize<br />

varieties according to their end uses and to breed new hybrids,<br />

not only as far as their agronomic performance is concerned,<br />

but also for their technological properties. In order to obtain<br />

a widely accepted hardness evaluation and milling behaviour<br />

standard for maize kernels, it will be necessary to establish a<br />

limited list of simple, rapid and reliable tests, which could improve<br />

the explanation of maize hardness measurements in relation to<br />

end-use value, using a multivariate approach that simultaneously<br />

takes into account the hardness associated with both physical<br />

and chemical properties. The data of this study offer preliminary<br />

information that could help provide the main grain traits that<br />

determine end-use processing performance and reduce the risk of<br />

misclassification of maize hardness.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The funds for this research were provided thanks to grants from<br />

the Provincia di Torino, Servizio Agricoltura.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Bettge AD and Morris CF, Relationships among grain hardness,<br />

pentosan fractions and end-use quality of wheat. Cereal Chem<br />

77:241–247 (2000).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1877


1878<br />

2 Watson SA, Measurement and maintenance of quality, in Corn:<br />

Chemistry and Technology, ed. by Watson SA and Ramstad PE.<br />

American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN, pp. 125–183<br />

(1987).<br />

3 Lee KM, Bean SR, Alavi S, Herrman TJ and Waniska RD, Physical and<br />

biochemical properties of maize hardness and extrudates of<br />

selected hybrids. J Agric Food Chem 54:4260–4269 (2006).<br />

4 Shandera DL, Jackson DS and Johnson BE, Quality factor impacting<br />

processing of maize dent hybrids. Maydica 42:281–289 (1997).<br />

5 Serna-Saldivar SO, Gomez MH and Rooney LW, Food uses of regular<br />

and specialty corns and their dry-milled fraction, in Specialty Corns<br />

(2nd edn), ed. by Hallauer AR. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 303–333<br />

(1991).<br />

6 Wu YV, Corn hardness as related to yield and particle size of fractions<br />

from micro hammer-cutter mill. Cereal Chem 69:343–347 (1992).<br />

7 Chandrashekar AandMazhar H,Thebiochemicalbasisandimplication<br />

of grain strength in sorghum and maize. J Cereal Sci 30:193–207<br />

(1999).<br />

8 Mestres C and Matencio F, Biochemical basis of kernel milling<br />

characteristics and endosperm vitreousness of maize. J Cereal Sci<br />

24:283–290 (1996).<br />

9 Robutti JL, Borras FS, and Eyherabide GH, Zein composition of<br />

mechanically separated coarse and fine portions of maize kernels.<br />

Cereal Chem 74:75–78 (1997).<br />

10 Mestres C, Louis-Alexander A, Matencio F and Lahlou A, Dry milling<br />

properties of maize. Cereal Chem 68:51–56 (1991).<br />

11 Fox G and Manley M, Hardness methods for testing maize kernels. J<br />

Agric Food Chem 57:5647–5657 (2009).<br />

12 Li PX-P, Hardacre AK, Campanella OH and Kirkpatrick KJ, Determination<br />

of endosperm characteristics of 38 corn hybrids using the<br />

Stenvert hardness test. Cereal Chem 73:466–471 (1996).<br />

13 Almeida-Dominguez HD, Suhendro EL and Rooney LW, Factors<br />

affecting rapid visco analyser curves for the determination of maize<br />

kernel hardness. J Cereal Sci 25:93–102 (1997).<br />

14 Williams P, Geladi P, Fox G and Manley M, Maize kernel hardness<br />

classification by near infrared (NIR) hyperspectral imaging and<br />

multivariate data analysis. Anal Chim Acta 653:121–130 (2009).<br />

15 Lee KM, Herrman TJ, Lingenfelser J and Jackson DS, Classification<br />

and prediction of maize hardness-associated properties using<br />

multivariate statistical analyses. J Cereal Sci 41:85–93 (2005).<br />

16 Fox GP, Osborne B, Bowman J, Kelly A, CaKir M, Poulsen D, et al,<br />

Predicting a hardness measurement using the single-kernel<br />

characterization system. Cereal Chem 73:278–283 (1996).<br />

17 Greffeuille V, Abecassis J, Rousset M, Oury F-X, Faye A and Bar<br />

L’Helgouac’h C, Grain characterization and milling behaviour of<br />

near-isogeniclinesdifferingbyhardness.TheorApplGenet 114:1–12<br />

(2006).<br />

18 Haddad Y, Benet JC and Abecassis J, A rapid general method for<br />

appraising the rheological properties of the starchy endosperm of<br />

cereal grains. Cereal Chem 75:673–676 (1998).<br />

19 Shandera DL and Jackson DS, Corn kernel structural integrity: analysis<br />

using solvent and heat treatments. Cereal Chem 79:308–316 (2002).<br />

20 Gaytán Martínez M, Figueroa Cardenas JD, Reyes Vega ML, Rincon<br />

Sanchez F and Morales Sanchez E, Microstructure of starch granules<br />

related to kernel hardness in corn. Rev Fitotec Mex 29:135–139<br />

(2006).<br />

21 Stenvert NL, Grinding resistance, a simple measure of wheat hardness.<br />

Flour Anim Feed Milling 12:24–26 (1974).<br />

22 Pomeranz Y, Czuchjowska Z, Martin CR and Lai F, Determination of<br />

corn hardness by Stenvert hardness tester. CerealChem 62:108–110<br />

(1985).<br />

www.soci.org M Blandino et al.<br />

23 Mestres C, Matencio F and Louis-Alexandre A, Mechanical behaviour<br />

of corn kernels: development of a laboratory friability test that can<br />

predict milling behaviour. Cereal Chem 72:652–657 (1995).<br />

24 Pomeranz Y, Hall GE, Czuchjowska Z and Lai F, Test weight, hardness,<br />

and breakage susceptibility of yellow dent corn hybrids. Cereal<br />

Chem 63:349–351 (1986).<br />

25 Roudot AC,Someconsiderationsforatheoryofplanttissuemechanics.<br />

Sci Aliments 26:409–426 (2006).<br />

26 Letaief H, Rolle L and Gerbi V, Mechanical behavior of wine grapes<br />

under compression tests. Am J Enol Vitic 59:323–329 (2008).<br />

27 Wichser WR, The world of corn processing. Am Miller Process 89:29–31<br />

(1961).<br />

28 Gibson TS, Solah VA and McCleary BV, A procedure to measure<br />

amylose in cereal starches and flour with concanavalin A. J Cereal<br />

Sci 25:111–119 (1997).<br />

29 Yuan J and Flores RA, Laboratory dry-milling performance of white<br />

corn: effect of physical and chemical corn characteristics. Cereal<br />

Chem 73:574–578 (1996).<br />

30 Kirleis AW and Stroshine RL, Effect of hardness and drying<br />

air temperature on breakage susceptibility and dry-milling<br />

characteristics of yellow dent corn. Cereal Chem 67:523–528 (1990).<br />

31 Pomeranz Y, Czuchjowska Z and Lai F, Gross composition of coarse<br />

and fine fractions of small corn samples ground on the Stenvert<br />

hardness tester. Cereal Chem 63:22–26 (1986).<br />

32 Le Deschault de Monredon F, Devaux MF and Chaurand M, Particle<br />

size characterization of ground fraction of dent and flint maize. Sci<br />

Aliments 16:117–132 (1996).<br />

33 Wu YV and Bergquist RR, Relation of corn grain density to yields of<br />

dry-milling products. Cereal Chem 68:542–544 (1991).<br />

34 Kirleis AW, Crosby KD and Housley TL, A method for quantitatively<br />

measuring vitreous endosperm area in sectioned sorghum grain.<br />

Cereal Chem 61:556–558 (1984).<br />

35 Louis-Alexandre A and Mestres C, Measurement of endosperm<br />

vitreousness of corn: a quantitative method and its application<br />

to African cultivars. Cereal Chem 68:614–617 (1991).<br />

36 Dorsey-Redding C, Hurburgh CR Jr, Johnson LA and Fox SR,<br />

Relationship among maize quality factors. Cereal Chem 68:602–605<br />

(1991).<br />

37 Robutti J, Borras F, Ferrer M, Percibaldi M and Knutson CA, Evaluation<br />

of quality factors in Argentine maize races. Cereal Chem 77:24–26<br />

(2000).<br />

38 Dombrink-Kurtzam MA and Knutson CA, A study of maize endosperm<br />

hardness in relation to amylose content and susceptibility to<br />

damage. Cereal Chem 74:776–780 (1997).<br />

39 Kim TH, Hampton JG, Opara LU, Hardacre AK and Mackay BR, Effects<br />

of maize grain size, shape and hardness on drying rate and the<br />

occurrence of stress cracks. J Sci Food Agric 82:1232–1239 (2002).<br />

40 Greenaway WT, A wheat hardness index. Cereal Sci Today 14:4–7<br />

(1969).<br />

41 Martìnex-Bustos F, Chang YK, Bannwart AC, Rodrìguez M, Guedes PA<br />

and Gaiotti ER, Effect of calcium hydroxide and processing<br />

conditions on corn meal extrudates. Cereal Chem 75:796–801<br />

(1998).<br />

42 Gonzales RJ, De Greef DM, Torres RL, Borras FS and Robutti J, Effect of<br />

endosperm hardness and extrusion temperature on properties of<br />

product obtained with grits from two commercial maize cultivars.<br />

Lebensm Wiss Technol 37:193–198 (2004).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1870–1878


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 26 February 2010 Revised: 22 April 2010 Accepted: 4 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 3 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4028<br />

Use of earthworms (Eisenia fetida)toreduce<br />

phytotoxicity and promote humification of<br />

pre-composted olive oil mill wastewater<br />

Grazia Masciandaro, Cristina Macci, ∗ Serena Doni and Brunello Ceccanti<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Olive mill wastewaters (OMWW) contain a high recalcitrant organic load and an associated toxicity that make<br />

their treatment necessary before environmental application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of promoting<br />

the valorization and reducing the phytotoxicity of OMWW through a pre-composting process together with straw-chip bulking<br />

materials followed by the application of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) in the presence of oat seedlings (Avena sativa L.) seedlings.<br />

RESULTS: After 3 months, the pre-composted material showed properties similar to a partially digested compost with<br />

some significant amelioration of chemical–physical and biochemical properties. The application of earthworms permitted<br />

a significant decrease in chemical (total organic carbon, water-extractable organic carbon, total nitrogen) and biological<br />

parameters (dehydrogenase enzyme activity), and an increase in humic substances and available nitrogen forms. In the<br />

presence of plants a higher C/N ratio and a lower content of nitrates were observed. In addition, the reduction in phenolic<br />

compounds observed in treatments with earthworms caused a decrease in phytotoxicity by about 50% with respect to the<br />

pre-composted material, which results in an increase in germination index.<br />

CONCLUSION: The utilization of earthworms, in particular in the presence of plants, may be an ecologically sound and<br />

economically feasible technology to obtain a non-toxic, high-value product useful for agricultural purposes.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: phenolic compounds; organic matter; olive oil mill wastewater; vermicompost; earthworms<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Olive oil mill wastewaters (OMWW) are produced during the<br />

olive oil extraction process. OMWW are characterized by low pH<br />

(4.0–6.5) and by a high pollution load due to (1) high content of<br />

mineral salts and (2) large amounts of organic compounds and<br />

polyphenol substances. 1 In particular, these last compounds are<br />

mainly responsible for the high toxicity of the OMWW because they<br />

are resistant to biological degradation and also have antimicrobial<br />

properties.<br />

In Italy the disposal of OMWW into soil is only possible<br />

according to strict national technical regulations (law 574, 11<br />

November 1996). These criteria are very rigorous in reducing<br />

possible environmental damage and take into account mainly<br />

soil texture, effluent volume/soil surface ratio and organic<br />

load of the effluents. As an alternative to spreading on the<br />

land, in recent years physicochemical methods and biological<br />

treatments have been employed in order to recover or recycle<br />

this residue. The physicochemical methods include dilution,<br />

evaporation, sedimentation, filtration and centrifugation. 2 All<br />

these treatments are expensive and do not solve the problem<br />

completely because the product is a residue which needs<br />

to be discharged. Biological methods, on the other hand,<br />

are generally low-cost processes and have the advantage of<br />

producing a stabilized material with fertilizing properties. They<br />

are mostly based on anaerobic degradation, 3 composting, 4,5 and<br />

the utilization of fungi that are able to metabolize lignin-related<br />

compounds. 6<br />

In recent years also vermicomposting – a special composting<br />

process that involves the addition of certain species of earthworms<br />

to enhance the conversion and detoxification of different organic<br />

wastes, 7–9 including olive oil mill wastes (OMW), such as dry olive<br />

cake and OMWW, 10,11 has been established. The worms are able to<br />

decompose the organic compounds by fragmenting the substrate<br />

material and by providing the more microbiologically active casts<br />

(fecal material). This leads to humification through which the<br />

unstable organic matter is oxidized and stabilized. 12<br />

Vermicompost is characterized by a higher nutrient content,<br />

homogeneity and freedom from pathogens compared to traditional<br />

compost. 13,14 Vermicompost is, moreover, believed to have<br />

additional attributes of providing enzymes and hormones which<br />

stimulate plant growth. 15 – 17 On the other hand, the presence of<br />

plants could affect earthworm development since they are considered<br />

to feed on roots 18 and are found to concentrate in the<br />

rhizosphere zone. 19,20<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Cristina Macci, Institute of Ecosystem Study – National<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Council, 56124 Pisa, Italy. E-mail: cristina.macci@ise.cnr.it<br />

Institute of Ecosystem Study – National <strong>Research</strong> Council (CNR), 56124 Pisa,<br />

Italy<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1879–1885 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1879


1880<br />

It has been hypothesized that plants, at the rhizosphere level,<br />

provide a complex and dynamic microenvironment in which<br />

microorganisms and earthworms, in association with roots, form<br />

unique communities that have a high metabolic activity and<br />

considerable potential for the detoxification of OMWW. 21,22<br />

In view of this, the aim of the present study was to evaluate<br />

the feasibility of promoting humification and reducing the<br />

phytotoxicity of OMWW through: (1) OMWW adsorbed onto strawchip<br />

bulking materials in order to obtain a pre-composted material<br />

(CM), thus affecting positively the biochemical characteristics and<br />

making it suitable for living organisms; and (2) CM treatment with<br />

earthworms (Eisenia fetida) and/or oat seedlings (Avena sativa L.)<br />

in order to drive the process forward and production of a nontoxic,<br />

high-quality, biologically active organic fertilizer (E and EP<br />

vermicomposts, respectively).<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Materials<br />

OMWW was obtained from a local olive oil production plant (San<br />

Giuliano Terme, Pisa, Italy), which uses a traditional discontinuous<br />

process for the extraction of olive oil. The cellulose material (chips<br />

and straw) was obtained from municipal prunings. The plants and<br />

earthworms used in the vermicomposting process were Avena<br />

sativa L. and Eisenia fetida, respectively. The characteristics of<br />

the starting materials (chips and straw and OMWW), mixture and<br />

pre-composting material (CM) are reported in Table 1.<br />

Experimental layout<br />

The OMWW were absorbed onto cellulose material (chips and<br />

straw) (OMWW : cellulose material 1 : 1, v/v). The mixture was<br />

incubated in a 100 dm 3 container for 3 months, with the aim of<br />

obtaining a partially stabilized composted material (CM). Then,<br />

500 g of CM was placed in plastic pots (25×15×5 cm) and treated<br />

as follows: (1) CM + 40 adult earthworms (Eisenia fetida)(E);(2)CM<br />

+ 40 adult earthworms (Eisenia fetida) + 100 seeds of Avena sativa<br />

L. (EP); (3) CM alone, used as a control (C).<br />

The experiment was carried out in triplicate under controlled<br />

laboratory conditions (temperature and humidity) for 3 months.<br />

The sampling was done every month; samples were sieved at<br />

www.soci.org G Masciandaro et al.<br />

2 mm and stored at room temperature for chemical and biological<br />

analyses.<br />

Methods<br />

Chemical parameters<br />

Electrical conductivity (EC) and pH were measured in 1 : 10 (w/v)<br />

aqueous solution. Total organic carbon (TOC), total extractable carbon<br />

(TEC) (1 : 10 w/v sodium pyrophosphate solution 0.1 mol L −1<br />

pH 11, 4 h at 60 ◦ C) and water-extractable organic carbon (WSC)<br />

(1 : 10 w/v aqueous solution, 1 h at 60 ◦ C) were determined using<br />

dichromate oxidation. 23 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) was<br />

determined by the Kjeldahl method. 24<br />

Nitrate and NH3 were measured in a 1 : 10 (w/v) water extract<br />

by ionic chromatography using a DIONEX chromatograph and by<br />

an ammonia-selective electrode, respectively. Total phenols were<br />

determined using the spectrophotometric method associated<br />

with Folin–Ciocalteu phenol reagent. 25 Specifically, a 0.5 mL<br />

water-extractable phenol or phenol standard (Sigma-Aldrich n.<br />

24–1520 phenol stock solution) was mixed with 3.5 mL sodium<br />

carbonate solution (3.7%), 0.5 mL copper sulfate (0.06%) and<br />

0.5 mL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. The final solution was left in<br />

the dark for 15 min at 37 ◦ C and afterwards the absorbance of<br />

the solution was measured at 725 nm. A similar procedure was<br />

followed using a distilled-water reagent blank. For instrumental<br />

calibration, standard phenol solutions at different concentrations<br />

were used.<br />

The analysis of monomeric phenolic fractions was done<br />

using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to evaluate the<br />

concentration of some of the most common phenolic compounds<br />

found in OMWW, 26,27 such as tyrosol, p-hydroxybenzoic acid,<br />

p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, vanillic acid, protocatechuic acid,<br />

p-coumaric acid and caffeic acid. Samples were mixed in distilled<br />

water (1 : 10 w/v) and shaken for 1 h at 60 ◦ C. After centrifugation,<br />

an aliquot (5 mL) was acidified to pH < 2with1molL −1 HCl.<br />

The solution was washed three times with 5 mL n-hexane in an<br />

ultrasonic bath for 10 min, in order to eliminate small amounts<br />

of triglycerides. 28 The hexane extract (phase) was discharged<br />

every time. The solutions were then extracted three times with<br />

5 mL ethyl acetate in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. The pooled<br />

organic phase was treated with anhydrous sodium sulfate to<br />

Table 1. Chemical parameters of olive oil mill wastewaters (OMWW), cellulose material, mixture and composted material after 3 months (CM). Mean<br />

of three replicates ± standard deviation<br />

Parameters OMWW a Cellulose Mixture CM<br />

pH 4.8 ± 0.1 6.97 ± 0.22 7.8 ± 0.1 7.2 ± 0.1<br />

EC 8.20 ± 0.33 2.41 ± 0.15 1.23 ± 0.11 2.23 ± 0.20<br />

COD 180 ± 14 – – –<br />

TOC 67.5 ± 5.3 219 ± 7 380 ± 11 360 ± 6<br />

WSC – 18.4 ± 0.1 27.9 ± 1.3 8.74 ± 0.52<br />

TEC – – 60.2 ± 2.3 33.3 ± 2.6<br />

TN 5.0 ± 0.2 7.32 ± 0.37 13.1 ± 0.2 8.45 ± 0.30<br />

NH3 44.2 ± 1.2 51.1 ± 2.3 91.6 ± 2.2 44.3 ± 3.5<br />

C/N 13.5 30 30.4 42.6<br />

Total phenols 10.1 ± 0.7 – 3.20 ± 0.20 1.18 ± 0.08<br />

DH-ase 1.47 ± 0.09 – 120 ± 1 16.8 ± 0.3<br />

EC, electrical conductivity (dS m −1 ); COD, chemical oxygen demand ( a gL −1 ); TOC, total organic carbon ( a gCL −1 and g C kg −1 ); WSC, water-soluble<br />

carbon (g C kg −1 ); TEC, total extractable carbon (g C kg −1 ); TN, total nitrogen ( a gNL −1 and g N kg −1 ); NH3, ammonia ( a mg NH3 L −1 and mg NH3 kg −1 );<br />

total phenols ( a gL −1 and g kg −1 ); DH-ase, dehydrogenase activity ( a mg INTF L −1 h −1 and mg INTF kg −1 h −1 ).<br />

a units for OMWW.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1879–1885


Earthworm treatment to reduce phytotoxicity of pre-composted olive mill wastewater www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Chemical parameters of treatments (E: only earthworms; EP: earthworms and plants) and control (C) after 30 days (30d), 60 days (60d) and<br />

90 days (90d)<br />

C E EP<br />

30 days 60 days 90 days 30 days 60 days 90 days 30 days 60 days 90 days<br />

pH 7.9 ± 0.3a 7.4 ± 0.2a 7.8 ± 0.2a 8.0 ± 0.1a 7.7 ± 0.2a 8.0 ± 0.1a 7.9 ± 0.4a 7.8 ± 0.2a 8.0 ± 0.1a<br />

EC (dS m−1 ) 2.04 ± 0.08c 2.64 ± 0.09b 1.95 ± 0.10b 2.71 ± 0.11a 2.93 ± 0.09a 2.47 ± 0.10a 2.46 ± 0.07b 2.27 ± 0.11c 2.01 ± 0.12b<br />

TOC<br />

(g kg−1 )<br />

340 ± 2a 364 ± 9a 360 ± 13a 243 ± 20b 261 ± 6b 151 ± 3c 264 ± 21b 250 ± 16b 252 ± 0b<br />

WSC<br />

(g kg−1 )<br />

10.3 ± 0.2a 11.5 ± 0.4a 10.2 ± 0.1a 9.06 ± 0.15b 9.16 ± 0.75b 7.63 ± 0.52b 9.02 ± 0.11b 8.85 ± 0.23c 8.33 ± 0.22b<br />

TN (g kg−1 ) 8.0 ± 0.2b 7.90 ± 0.18b 7.60 ± 0.07a 10.1 ± 0.5a 9.54 ± 0.07a 6.95 ± 0.07b 10.2 ± 0.1a 9.30 ± 0.20a 6.77 ± 0.12b<br />

NH3<br />

(mg kg−1 )<br />

50.3 ± 2.6b 45.6 ± 0.5c 49.1 ± 1.1b 65.1 ± 2.9a 62.0 ± 0.1a 70.1 ± 1.4a 60.5 ± 4.0a 60.0 ± 1.2b 67.5 ± 1.4a<br />

NO3 −<br />

(mg kg−1 )<br />

2.06 ± 0.15a 4.91 ± 0.42c 8.40 ± 0.81c 1.62 ± 0.17b 51.5 ± 3.3a 105 ± 8a 1.55 ± 0.10b 35.6 ± 1.7b 64.7 ± 5.0b<br />

Total<br />

phenols<br />

(g kg−1 )<br />

1.04 ± 0.06c 1.26 ± 0.05a 1.15 ± 0.03a 1.15 ± 0.04b 1.10 ± 0.02b 0.99 ± 0.03b 1.20 ± 0.03a 1.09 ± 0.04b 0.92 ± 0.05c<br />

EC, electrical conductivity; TOC, total organic carbon; WSC, water-soluble carbon; TN, total nitrogen.<br />

Mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. For each time period different letters ( a , b , c ) indicate statistically significant different values among<br />

treatments (P < 0.05).<br />

remove the residue water and evaporated to dryness under a<br />

stream of nitrogen; the residue was derivatized with 50 µL N,Obis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide<br />

at 60 ◦ Cfor30min. 29,30 Then,<br />

10 µL hexadecane and 100 µL isooctane as solvent were added.<br />

A2µL volume of the derivatized solution was injected into the<br />

gas chromatograph–mass spectrometer. Linear calibration curves<br />

were obtained in the range of 1–20 µg mL −1 . Chromatographic<br />

analyses were performed using a gas chromatograph model<br />

1800A (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA), equipped with<br />

a split–splitless injection port and coupled with a quadrupole<br />

mass spectrometric detector with an electron impact of 70 eV.<br />

Chromatographic separation of the analytes was performed on a<br />

chemically bonded fused-silica capillary column HP-5 MS (Hewlett<br />

Packard) (5% phenyl - 95% methyl-polysiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm<br />

× 0.25 µm), connected to a 2 m × 0.32 mm deactivated fusedsilica<br />

capillary pre-column. Injector temperature was 250 ◦ Cand<br />

detector temperature was 280 ◦ C. The carrier gas was helium,<br />

(purity: 99.995%), at a constant flow of 1 mL min −1 . The oven<br />

temperature program was as follows: from 80 to 135 ◦ C at<br />

8 ◦ Cmin −1 ; 5 min at 135 ◦ C; from 135 to 140 ◦ Cat1 ◦ Cmin −1 ;<br />

5 min at 140 ◦ C; from 140 to 300 ◦ Cat5 ◦ Cmin −1 . The mass range<br />

was from 45 to 450. The selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode was<br />

used for the quantitative determination of phenols, acquiring the<br />

following ion fragments (m/z): 57 for hexadecane; 179 for tyrosol;<br />

267 for p-hydroxybenzoic acid; 179 for p-hydroxyphenylacetic<br />

acid; 297 for vanillic acid; 193 for protocatechuic acid; 219 for<br />

p-coumaric acid and caffeic acid.<br />

Biological parameters<br />

Dehydrogenase (DH-ase) activity was determined by the method<br />

of Masciandaro et al., 31 using iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT)<br />

as substrate and determining spectrometrically (490 nm) the<br />

iodonitrotetrazolium formazan (INTF) product of the reaction. A<br />

germination test was carried out using seeds of Lepidiumsativum 32<br />

and Lolium perenne, 33 two plants that are extremely sensitive to<br />

toxic substances. Ten seeds were tested in Petri dishes using<br />

3 mL of 1 : 10 (w/v) water extract of material from each treatment<br />

and OMWW (controls were tested with distilled water). The Petri<br />

dishes were kept at 20 ◦ C in the dark until germination of seeds.<br />

The germination index (GI) was calculated after 72 h. The index<br />

is calculated as follows: GI% = P(T/C), where P is the mean<br />

percentage of seed germination, and T and C are mean lengths of<br />

the root in the treatment and in the control, respectively.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

All results are the means of three replicates. One-way analysis<br />

of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test the effect of the<br />

treatments on chemical and biochemical parameters. The means<br />

were compared by using least significant differences calculated at<br />

P < 0.05 (Newman–Keuls test). A statistical correlation between<br />

the data was also calculated for determining the relationship<br />

between chemical and biological parameters (data not reported).<br />

RESULTS<br />

The pH was higher in the mixture with respect to OMWW and<br />

cellulose material. A decrease in carbon and nitrogen compounds,<br />

and in their total (TOC and TN) and soluble (WSC and NH3) forms,<br />

was observed in the composted material (CM) after 3 months<br />

from the mixture preparation; this was a clear indicator that the<br />

more labile fractions of organic matter were being mineralized<br />

by microorganisms, which used these compounds as an energy<br />

source (Table 1). The higher dehydrogenase activity observed<br />

in the mixture with respect to CM confirmed the stimulation of<br />

microbial activity by the huge amount of labile organic compounds<br />

present in it (Table 1). Also, in the vermicomposting processes<br />

(Table 2; E and EP), particularly in the E treatment, TOC and<br />

WSC amounts decreased significantly with respect to the control<br />

treatment (C). On the other hand, N-soluble compounds, NH3 and<br />

NO3 − , increased in the E and EP treatments (Table 2). The NO3 −<br />

content was significantly higher in the E treatment compared to<br />

EP at the end of the experimental period.<br />

The values of TEC (humic matter) increased significantly during<br />

the early period (first 30 days) of the vermicomposting process,<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1879–1885 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1881


1882<br />

Figure 1. Total extractable carbon (a) and dehydrogenase activity<br />

(b) during the experimental period. (�) Earthworms;(�) earthworms+<br />

plants; (•) control. Vertical bars indicate standard error.<br />

while in C it started to increase after 1 month (Fig. 1(a)). The DH-ase<br />

activity, which decreased over the 3 months of pre-composting<br />

(Table 1; CM), increased rapidly, in particular in the E treatment, in<br />

the first 30 days of vermicomposting experiments. Subsequently,<br />

DH-ase activity decreased until stabilization at the end of the<br />

experiment (Fig. 1(b)).<br />

In order to evaluate the detoxification process of OMWW,<br />

total phenols and monomeric phenolic fractions were detected.<br />

The highest decrease in total phenols (60%) was observed<br />

during the 3 months of the composting process (Table 1). In<br />

the vermicomposting experiments a significant decrease in total<br />

phenols was observed in the two treatments (E and EP), especially<br />

in EP, while in C no significant variation during the same time was<br />

detected (Table 2).<br />

Analysis of monomeric phenolic fractions was carried out on<br />

the water extracts of the samples, so that only soluble phenolic<br />

substances which could have an ecological toxic action<br />

towards microorganisms, plants and groundwater were determined.<br />

A gas chromatographic analysis of the raw OMWW<br />

used in the experiment was performed to obtain a characterization<br />

of monomeric phenolic fractions. All of the expected<br />

phenolic marker compounds 26,27 were found in OMWW (tyrosol,<br />

p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, protocatechuic acid, caffeic acid, phydroxybenzoic<br />

acid, vanillic acid and p-coumaric acid), but also<br />

other phenolic substances, such as p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, 4hydroxy-3<br />

ymethoxybenzaldehyde and ferulic acid were detected.<br />

p-Coumaric acid was the major compound detected in OMWW,<br />

at a concentration of 20 µgg −1 , while the other phenolic com-<br />

www.soci.org G Masciandaro et al.<br />

pounds had concentrations in the range 1–5 µg g −1 .InCMthe<br />

amount of phenolic monomers decreased, generally, by about<br />

50% if compared to the raw OMWW; in particular, p-coumaric acid<br />

decreased by about 90% (data not reported). In addition, specific<br />

monomers found in OMWW such as p-hydroxybenzaldehyde and<br />

4-hydroxy-3-ymethoxybenzaldehyde, were not present in CM. In<br />

CM, tyrosol had the lowest concentration, even though it is known<br />

as one of the most representative compounds of OMWW. 26,27 At<br />

the end of the vermicomposting experiments, the chromatograms<br />

of E and EP treatments and control samples showed a very low<br />

concentration (


Earthworm treatment to reduce phytotoxicity of pre-composted olive mill wastewater www.soci.org<br />

Figure 2. Reduction percentage of phenolic compounds during vermicomposting experiment in C (control), E (earthworms) and EP (earthworms +<br />

plants) treatments with respect to CM. The data are means of triplicate analysis (coefficient of variation of the three samples ranged from 2% to 10%).<br />

Figure 3. Germination test carried out withLepidiumsativum (a) andLolium<br />

perenne (b) on olive oil mill wastewaters (OMW), mixture, compost material<br />

(CM) and treatments at the end of laboratory experiment. C (control), E<br />

(earthworms) and EP (earthworms + plants. Vertical bars indicate standard<br />

error.<br />

the increase of TEC, especially in the E treatment. In addition,<br />

the negative correlation between DH-ase and TEC (r =−0.87;<br />

P < 0.05) suggested that mineralization and humification are<br />

consecutive processes carried out by microbial activity. The<br />

positive effect of earthworms on the N cycle was shown by the<br />

reduction in total ntrogen and high increase in nitrate. This was<br />

probably due to the capacity of earthworms and microorganisms<br />

to favor aerobic nitrification processes by their movement in the<br />

material, as already found in other studies. 37 – 39<br />

At the end of the experimental period, the lower amount in<br />

nitrates in EP with respect to E treatment was probably due to<br />

plant absorption, thus reducing the risk of NO3 nitrogen leaching<br />

from this organic amendment. Moreover, the presence of plants<br />

positively affected the TOC content through the release of root<br />

exudates and plant remains. 40 As a consequence, vermicompost<br />

with plants showed, after 90 days, a higher C/N ratio (about 30)<br />

with respect to that found in the E treatment (about 20), making<br />

it more suitable for agricultural purposes. 41<br />

A germination test has been carried out in order to evaluate<br />

the feasibility of the final product as an organic amendment.<br />

The results of the germination test showed a large reduction in<br />

toxicity of OMWW at the end of the vermicomposting process.<br />

In fact, the GI of both vermicomposts ranged from 90% to<br />

110%, compared with the 0% shown for OMWW as such.<br />

Therefore, after a vermicomposting process, the OMWW lose<br />

toxicity, thus stimulating seed germination and plant growth.<br />

The stimulation of plant germination and growth could also<br />

be due to the reduction in the total (in particular in EP<br />

treatment) and monomeric phenolic compounds. This result is<br />

in accordance with that of Hachicha et al., 42 who demonstrated a<br />

direct relationship between the polyphenol content and toxicity.<br />

On the other hand, in the control a large increase in concentration<br />

of coumaric and protocatechuic acids was observed; these<br />

compounds represent the last degradation products of phenol<br />

monomers before cleavage of the aromatic ring, 43 so that their<br />

accumulation in the control material could be the result of the<br />

partial degradation of phenolic compounds but without reaching<br />

complete degradation. Also, vanillic acid is one of the main lignin<br />

degradation products 44 and its increase would agree with the<br />

above.<br />

In the E and EP treatments the decrease in phenolic compounds,<br />

suggested the positive effect of earthworms in the degradation<br />

of these recalcitrant compounds through the aeration of material<br />

and their catabolic activity. On the other hand, the mineralization<br />

of lignin–cellulose substrates 45 and the metabolic processes of<br />

plants 46 can induce release of phenolic monomers, thus explaining<br />

the lower reduction in these compounds in EP with respect to E<br />

treatment.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1879–1885 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1883


1884<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Our study found that earthworms, in the presence (EP) or absence<br />

of plants (E), were efficient in the mineralization and stabilization<br />

of OMWW, as shown by the decrease in total organic compounds,<br />

the trend of dehydrogenase activity and the increase in humic<br />

matter. The reduction in OMWW phenolic fractions was promoted<br />

in both E and EP experiments, suggesting the effectiveness of<br />

earthworms in the decrease of OMWW toxicity, as confirmed also<br />

by the increase in germination index. Even if the presence of<br />

plants did not affect phenolic monomer removal, the different<br />

evolutioninC/NratioandNO3 − between E and EP treatments<br />

suggested that the vermicompost obtained with plants could be<br />

more suitable for agricultural purposes owing to a higher C/N ratio<br />

(about 30) and a lower content of nitrates, which are considered<br />

potential contaminants for surface groundwater.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 D’Annibale A, Bozzoli V, Crognale S, Gallo AM, Federici F and<br />

Petruccioli M, Optimisation by response surface methodology of<br />

fungal lipase production on olive mill wastewater. J Chem Technol<br />

Biotechnol 81:1586–1593 (2006).<br />

2 Paraskeva P and Diamadopoulos E, Technologies for olive mill<br />

wastewater (OMW) treatment: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol<br />

81:1475–1485 (2006).<br />

3 Niaounakis M and Halvadakis CP, Olive Processing Waste Management:<br />

Literature Review and Patent Survey (2nd edn). Elsevier, Amsterdam<br />

(2006).<br />

4 Hachicha S, Sallemi F, Medhioub K, Hachicha R and Ammar E, Quality<br />

assessment of composts prepared with olive mill wastewater and<br />

agricultural wastes. Waste Manage 28:2593–2603 (2008).<br />

5 Baeta-Hall L, Ceu Saagua M, Lourdes Bartolomev M, Anselmo AM and<br />

Fernanda Rosa M, Bio-degradation of olive oil husks in composting<br />

aerated piles. Bioresour Technol 96:69–78 (2005).<br />

6 Casa R, D’Annibale A, Pieruccetti F, Stazi SR, Sermanni GG and Lo<br />

Cascio B, Reduction of the phenolic components in olive-mill<br />

wastewater by enzymatic treatment and its impact on durum wheat<br />

(Triticum durum Desf.) germinability. Chemosphere 50:959–966<br />

(2003).<br />

7 Nogales R,Elvira C,Benítez E, Thompson R and Gómez M, Feasibility of<br />

vermicomposting dairy biosolids using a modified system to avoid<br />

earthworm mortality. J Environ Sci Health B 34:151–169 (1999).<br />

8 Edwards CA, Earthworm Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2004).<br />

9 Ceccanti B, Garcia C, Masciandaro G, Macci C and Doni S, Soil<br />

bioremediation: combination of earthworms and compost for the<br />

ecological remediation of a hydrocarbon polluted soil. Water Air Soil<br />

Pollut 177:383–397 (2006).<br />

10 Benitez E, Sainz H, Melgar R and Nogales R, Vermicomposting of a<br />

lignocellulosic by-product from olive oil industry: a pilot scale<br />

study. Waste Manage Res 20:134–142 (2002).<br />

11 Mari I, Ehaliotis C, Kotsou M, Balis C and Georgakakis D, Respiration<br />

profiles in monitoring the composting of by-products from the<br />

olive oil agro-industry. Bioresour Technol 87:331–336 (2003).<br />

12 Suthar S, Potential of Allolobophora parva (Oligochaeta) in<br />

vermicomposting. Bioresour Technol 100:6422–6427 (2009).<br />

13 Szczech MM, Suppressiveness of vermicompost against Fusarium wilt<br />

of tomato. J Phytopathol 155–161 (1999).<br />

14 Slocum K, Pathogen reduction in vermicomposting. Worm Digest<br />

23:27–28 (2002).<br />

15 Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S and Metzger JD, Pig manure<br />

vermicompost as a component of a horticultural bedding plant<br />

medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth.<br />

Bioresour Technol 78:11–20 (2001).<br />

16 Atiyeh RM, Lees S, Edwards CA, Arancon NQ and Metzger JD, The<br />

influence of humic acids derived from earthworm processed organic<br />

wastes on plant growth. Bioresour Technol 84:7–14 (2002).<br />

17 Chaoui HI, Zibilske LM and Ohno T, Effects of earthworm casts and<br />

compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability.<br />

Soil Biol Biochem 35:295–302 (2003).<br />

18 Cortez J and Bouclè MB, Do earthworms eat living roots? Soil Biol<br />

Biochem 9:913–915 (1992).<br />

www.soci.org G Masciandaro et al.<br />

19 Babel U, Ehrmann O and Krebs M, Relationships between earthworms<br />

and some plant species in a meadow. Soil Biol Biochem<br />

12:1477–1481 (1992).<br />

20 Milleret R, Le Bayon RC and Gobat JM, Root, mycorrhiza and<br />

earthworm interactions: their effects on soil structuring processes,<br />

plant and soil nutrient concentration and plant biomass. Plant Soil<br />

316:1–12 (2009).<br />

21 Alphei J, Bonkowski M and Scheu S, Protozoa, Nematoda and<br />

Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europaeus (Poaceae):<br />

faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on<br />

plant growth. Oecologia 106:111–126 (1996).<br />

22 Atiyeh RM, Lee S, Edwards CA, Arancon NQ and Metzger JD, The<br />

influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed<br />

organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresour Technol 84:7–14 (2002).<br />

23 Yeomans JC and Bremner JM, A rapid and precise method for routine<br />

determination of organic carbon in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal<br />

19:1467–1476 (1988).<br />

24 Jackson ML, Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ<br />

(1960).<br />

25 Folin O and Ciocalteu V, On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations<br />

in proteins. JBiolChem73:627–650 (1927).<br />

26 Knupp G, Rucker G, Ramos-Cormenzana A, Hoyos GS, Neugebauer M<br />

and Ossenkop T, Problems of identifying phenolic compounds<br />

during the microbial degradation of olive mill wastewater. Int<br />

Biodeterior Biodegradation 38:277–282 (1996).<br />

27 Miranda MA, Galindo F, Amat AM and Arques A, Pyrylium saltphotosensitised<br />

degradation of phenolic contaminants present in<br />

olive oil wastewater with solar light part II. Appl Catal B 30:437–444<br />

(2001).<br />

28 Saitta M, Lo Curto S, Salvo F, Di Bella G and Dugo G, Gas<br />

chromatographic–tandem mass spectrometric identification of<br />

phenolic compounds in Sicilian olive oils. Anal Chim Acta<br />

466:335–344 (2002).<br />

29 Angerosa F, D’Alessandro N, Corana F and Mellerio G, Characterization<br />

of phenolic and secoiridoid algycons present in virgin olive oil<br />

by gas chromatography–chemical ionization mass spectrometry.<br />

J Chromatogr A 736:195–203 (1996).<br />

30 Helaleh MJH, Takabayashi Y, Fujii S and Korenaga T, Gas<br />

chromatographic–mass spectrometric method for separation and<br />

detection of endocrine disruptors from environmental water<br />

samples. Anal Chim Acta 428:227–234 (2001).<br />

31 Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Ronchi V and Bauer C, Kinetic parameters<br />

of dehydrogenase in the assessment of the response of soil to<br />

treatments by vermicompost and inorganic fertilisers. Biol Fertil<br />

Soils 32:479–483 (2000).<br />

32 Zucconi F, Pera A, Forte M and De Bertoldi M, Biological evaluation of<br />

compost maturity. Biocycle 22:27–29 (1981).<br />

33 Cheng CY and Chu LM, Phytotoxicity data safeguard the performance<br />

of the recipient plants in leachate irrigation. Environ Pollut<br />

145:195–202 (2007).<br />

34 Tomati U, Galli E, Pasetti L and Volterra E, Bioremediation of olive-mill<br />

wastewaters by composting. Waste Manage Res 13:509–518 (1995).<br />

35 Benitez E, Nogales R, Elvira C, Masciandaro G and Ceccanti B, Enzyme<br />

activities as indicator of the stabilization of sewage sludges<br />

composting of Eisenia foetida. Bioresour Technol 67:297–303 (1999).<br />

36 Wang P, Qu Y and Zhou J, Biodegradation of mixed phenolic<br />

compounds under high salt conditions and salinity fluctuations by<br />

Arthrobacter sp. W1. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 159:623–633 (2009).<br />

37 Parkin TB and Berry EC, Microbial nitrogen transformation in<br />

earthworm burrows. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1765–1771 (1999).<br />

38 Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B and Garcia C, Soil agro-ecological<br />

management: fertirrigation and vermicompost treatments.<br />

Bioresour Technol 59:199–206 (1997).<br />

39 Macci C, Masciandaro G and Ceccanti B, Vermicomposting of olive<br />

oil mill wastewater. Waste Manage Res in press (2010). DOI:<br />

10.1177/0734242X09345278.<br />

40 Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T,MorenoJLandRosM,Soilmicrobial<br />

activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes.<br />

Soil Biol Biochem 32:1877–1883 (2000).<br />

41 Avnimelech Y and Cohen A, Use of organic manures for amendment of<br />

compacted clay soils. II. Effect of carbon to nitrogen ratio. Commun<br />

Soil Sci Plant Anal 20:1635–1644 (1989).<br />

42 Hachicha S, Cegarra J, Sellami F, Hachicha R, Drira N, Medhioub K, et al,<br />

Elimination of polyphenols toxicity from olive mill wastewater<br />

sludge by its co-composting with sesame bark. J Hazard Mater<br />

161:1131–1139 (2009).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1879–1885


Earthworm treatment to reduce phytotoxicity of pre-composted olive mill wastewater www.soci.org<br />

43 Gallet C and Keller C, Phenolic composition of soil solution:<br />

comparative study of lysimeter and centrifuge waters. Soil Biol<br />

Biochem 31:1151–1160 (1999).<br />

44 Gallet C and Lebreton P, Evolution of phenolic patterns in plants and<br />

associated litters and humus of a mountain forest ecosystem. Soil<br />

Biol Biochem 27:157–165 (1995).<br />

45 Masselter S, Zemann A and Bobleter O, Analysis of lignin degradation<br />

products by capillary electrophoresis. Chromatographia 40:51–57<br />

(1995).<br />

46 Ryan D, Robards K, Prenzier P and Antolovich M, Applications of mass<br />

spectrometry to plant phenols. Trends Anal Chem 18:362–372<br />

(1999).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1879–1885 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1885


1886<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 28 January 2010 Revised: 30 April 2010 Accepted: 2 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 22 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4029<br />

Isolation and physicochemical characterisation<br />

of starch from cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta)<br />

grown in Malawi<br />

Davies E Mweta, a∗ Maryke T Labuschagne, a Susanna Bonnet, b<br />

Jannie Swarts b and John D K Saka c<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the physicochemical properties of starches isolated from Malawian<br />

cocoyams and compare them with those of cassava and corn starches.<br />

RESULTS: The purity of the isolated starches varied from 851 to 947 g kg −1 and pH from 4.93 to 6.95. Moisture, ash, protein, fat<br />

and amylose contents ranged from 104 to 132, 0.3 to 1.5, 3.5 to 8.4, 0.9 to 1.6, and 111 to 237 g kg −1 , respectively. Cocoyam<br />

starches gave higher potassium and phosphorus but lower calcium levels than the other starches. The shape of starch granules<br />

varied from spherical to polygonal with cocoyam starches displaying smaller-sized granules than cassava and corn starches.<br />

Cocoyam starches gave a higher wavelength of maximum iodine absorption and blue value but lower reducing capacity<br />

values than cassava and corn starches. The extent of acid hydrolysis of the starches also differed. Cocoyam starches exhibited<br />

amylopectin molecules of higher molecular weights but amylose molecules of lower molecular weights than cassava and corn<br />

starches. Cocoyam starches exhibited lower water absorption capacity and swelling power, paste clarity and viscosity but<br />

higher solubility, gelatinisation temperatures and retrogradation tendencies than cassava and corn starches.<br />

CONCLUSIONS: The physicochemical properties of native Malawian cocoyam starches vary among the different accessions and<br />

differ from those of cassava and corn starches.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: cocoyam; cassava; corn; starch; physicochemical properties<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott), a member of the Araceae<br />

family, is an important tuber crop worldwide mostly grown in<br />

tropical and subtropical countries for its edible corms and leaves.<br />

It is an important food crop in many Pacific Island countries, parts<br />

of Africa, Asia and the Caribbean. Ranking as the fourteenth most<br />

consumed vegetable worldwide, cocoyam is largely produced in<br />

Africa accounting for 60% of the world cocoyam production and<br />

Asia and the Pacific the remaining 40%. 1 In Malawi, cocoyam ranks<br />

third after cassava and sweetpotato and is mainly grown as a food<br />

crop. 2<br />

Cocoyam has a great potential as a source of starch that could<br />

replace commercial starches in various industrial applications.<br />

Its corms are known to have a high content of tiny, easily<br />

digestible, starch grains ranging between 22% and 40% ideal<br />

for use in food and cosmetic formulations, and pharmaceutical<br />

products. 3–5 However corn, potato and wheat still remain the most<br />

predominant sources for the commercial starches. 6 In Malawi, the<br />

industry predominantly depends on imported maize starch to<br />

meet its ever-increasing demand for starch. Therefore, there exists<br />

an opportunity for local Malawians and the country at large to<br />

benefit from the commercialisation of locally grown crops such as<br />

cocoyam through starch production.<br />

Several investigations into the characteristic properties of<br />

cocoyam starches have been conducted and the results of such<br />

investigations have shown that physicochemical properties of<br />

cocoyam starches vary with cultivar. 4,7,8 Comparison studies have<br />

also revealed that cocoyam starches exhibit properties different<br />

from those of starches from other crops. 3,9,10 However, none of<br />

these studies document the characteristic properties of Malawian<br />

cocoyam starches hence limiting their utilisation in the industry.<br />

Since starches from different botanical sources have their own<br />

characteristics, there is a need for determining the characteristic<br />

properties of starches isolated from cocoyam grown in Malawi so<br />

as to unravel their potential and increase their competitiveness on<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Davies E Mweta, Plant Sciences Department, University of<br />

the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa.<br />

E-mail: MwetaDE@ufs.ac.za<br />

a Plant Sciences Department, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339,<br />

Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa<br />

b Chemistry Department, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 339, Bloemfontein<br />

9300, South Africa<br />

c Chemistry Department, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, P.O. Box 280,<br />

Zomba, Malawi<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Properties of Malawian cocoyam starches www.soci.org<br />

the commercial market. This paper therefore reports the results of<br />

a study undertaken to determine the characteristic properties of<br />

native starch isolated from cocoyam grown in Malawi.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Materials<br />

Seven starches from different cocoyam accessions were used in<br />

this study. Cocoyam tubers were harvested from fields of local<br />

farmers in seven different cocoyam growing districts of Malawi:<br />

Chitipa, Mzimba (Mzuzu), Nkhotakota, Machinga, Mulanje, Thyolo<br />

and Zomba in May 2008. Starch was isolated from the fresh tubers<br />

as described by Benesi et al. 11 Starches from five different cassava<br />

varieties (Gomani, Maunjili, Mbundumali, Mkondezi and Sauti)<br />

and commercial corn starch from earlier starch studies in Malawi 11<br />

were used for comparison.<br />

Proximate composition<br />

Moisture content, pH and protein content of the starches<br />

were determined as described by Benesi et al. 11 Fat content<br />

was determined by Soxhlet extraction of 3 g of dried starch<br />

using hexane for 3 h. Ash content was determined by weight<br />

difference after ashing 2–3 g of dried starch samples in a muffle<br />

furnace at 525 ◦ C for 5 h. Amylose content was determined<br />

using an Amylose/Amylopectin Assay Kit (Megazyme International<br />

Ireland Ltd, Bray, Ireland). Purity of the isolated starches was<br />

determined by determining total starch using the Megazyme<br />

enzymatic/colorimetric method. 12<br />

Mineral content<br />

Starch samples for mineral content determination were prepared<br />

following the method of Njoku and Ohia. 13 Phosphorus content<br />

in the samples was determined by the ascorbic acid colorimetric<br />

method. The metal ions sodium (Na), potassium (K), iron (Fe), zinc<br />

(Zn), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn) and calcium (Ca) were<br />

analysed on a Varian SpectrAA 300 spectrometer (Varian Techtron<br />

Pty Limited, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia) using an air–acetylene<br />

flame.<br />

Granular morphology<br />

The granular morphology was studied using a Jeol Scanning<br />

Electron Microscope (JSM-6400, Tokyo, Japan). Starch granules<br />

were mounted on circular aluminium stubs using adhesive, coated<br />

with a thin layer of gold using a Bio-Rad sputter coating system and<br />

then examined at several magnifications and photographed. The<br />

range of the granule size was determined by measuring the length<br />

and width of 150 granules from the pictures. Size distributions of<br />

the starch granules were estimated by classifying the size of starch<br />

granules into four groups: large (>25 µm), medium (10–25 µm),<br />

small (5–10 µm) and very small (


1888<br />

at room temperature for moisture equilibration. The sealed pans<br />

were heated from 20 ◦ Cto95 ◦ C under nitrogen gas at a heating<br />

rate of 10 ◦ Cmin −1 to gelatinise the starch samples. From the DSC<br />

thermograms, the onset temperature (T0), peak temperature (Tp),<br />

conclusion temperature (Tc) and enthalpy of gelatinisation (�HG)<br />

were determined using STARe SW 9.00 software. Temperature<br />

range and peak height index (PHI) were also calculated as Tc − T0<br />

and as the ratio �HG/(Tp − T0), respectively. The gelatinised<br />

samples were stored at 4 ◦ C for 7 days for retrogradation studies.<br />

The pans were then equilibrated at room temperature for 2 h,<br />

and then rescanned in the DSC from 20 to 95 ◦ Cat10 ◦ Cmin −1 to<br />

measure the retrogradation transition temperatures and enthalpy.<br />

The degree of retrogradation was determined as the ratio of<br />

enthalpy change of retrograded starch to enthalpy change of<br />

gelatinised starch. 26<br />

Data analysis<br />

The data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using<br />

Statistix 8 for Windows (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, USA).<br />

Pearson correlation coefficients for relationships between various<br />

starch properties were also calculated.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Chemical composition<br />

The purity of the isolated starches determined as total starch<br />

content varied from 851–947 g kg −1 (Table 1). These levels are<br />

lower than those reported for cocoyam (989 g kg −1 ), makal<br />

(970 g kg −1 ) and sorghum starches (933–941 g kg −1 ) in the<br />

literature but comparable with those of maca root starch<br />

(878 g kg −1 ). 10,27–29 On average, corn starch displayed the highest<br />

purity (947 g kg −1 ) than cassava (892 g kg −1 ) and cocoyam<br />

(876 g kg −1 ) starches. The amylose content was the lowest in<br />

Nkhotakota cocoyam starch (106 g kg −1 ) and the highest in<br />

Gomani cassava starch (237 g kg −1 ). Generally, cocoyam starches<br />

displayed lower amylose content than those of cassava and corn<br />

starches. On the contrary, other researchers have reported higher<br />

levels of amylose in cocoyam starch than in cassava starch. 3,9<br />

The moisture content of the starches fell within the prescribed<br />

www.soci.org DE Mweta et al.<br />

industrial specification required for safe storage of starches to<br />

prevent deterioration in starch quality 30 ranging from 104 to<br />

132 g kg −1 for cocoyam starches, 124 to 130 g kg −1 for cassava<br />

starches and 113 g kg −1 for corn starch. The pH of the starches<br />

ranged from 5.18 to 6.95 for cocoyam starches, 4.93 to 5.70 for<br />

cassava starches and 5.98 for corn starch which is within the<br />

acceptable range for low acid food starches. 31<br />

The starches exhibited low levels of ash, protein and fat. The<br />

ash content ranged from 0.30 to 1.57 g kg −1 and was generally<br />

higher in cocoyam starches (1.44 g kg −1 ) than in cassava starches<br />

(1.09 g kg −1 ). Similar trend was reported by Pérez et al.; 10 however,<br />

Nwokocha et al. 9 reported the opposite. Fat content of the starches<br />

ranged from 1.07 to 1.60 g kg −1 within the cocoyam accessions,<br />

0.87 to 1.40 g kg −1 within the cassava cultivar and was 1.30 g kg −1<br />

for corn starch. Cocoyam starches displayed higher protein levels<br />

(4.4–8.4 g kg −1 ) than cassava (3.5–3.9 g kg −1 ) but similar to that<br />

of corn starch (7.2 g kg −1 ).<br />

Phosphorus content of the starches varied from 92.7 to<br />

110.1 mg kg −1 within the cocoyam accessions and 67.3 to<br />

121.3 mg kg −1 among the cassava cultivars (Table 2). These results<br />

fall within the reported phosphorus contents of cocoyam and<br />

cassava starches. 30 Generally, the phosphorus contents of the cocoyam<br />

and cassava starches were comparable but higher than that<br />

of corn starch. Higher levels of potassium were found in cocoyam<br />

than in cassava and corn starches. Calcium content was comparativelyhigherincassavastarchesthanincocoyamandcornstarches.<br />

Magnesium and sodium were present in intermediate levels while<br />

iron, zinc and manganese were present in very low amounts with<br />

manganese being the lowest (Table 2). Levels of minerals obtained<br />

in this study are lower than those reported for canna and arrowroot<br />

starches except for potassium levels that were higher. 32<br />

Iodine absorption spectra and reducing capacity<br />

There was significant variation (P < 0.001) in the iodine absorption<br />

spectra and reducing capacity of the starches (Table 3). Cocoyam<br />

starches displayed higher wavelength of maximum absorption<br />

and blue values than cassava starches. Corn starch exhibited<br />

intermediate values. These results suggest that cocoyam starches<br />

in this study contain longer chain starch molecules than cassava<br />

Table 1. Total starch, pH, moisture (MC), ash, fat, protein, and amylose contents of cocoyam, cassava and corn starches ∗<br />

Botanical<br />

source Accession/genotype<br />

Total starch<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Amylose<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

MC<br />

(g kg −1 ) pH<br />

Ash<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Fat<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

Cocoyam Chitipa 909 bc 161 e 132 a 6.38 de 1.37 abc 1.50 b 5.5 d<br />

Machinga 860 fg 136 f 111 gh 6.32 e 1.53 a 1.33 de 7.1 bc<br />

Mulanje 875 ef 111 g 109 h 6.54 c 1.33 abc 1.60 a 4.5 f<br />

Mzuzu 869 ef 155 e 126 cd 6.46 cd 1.50 ab 1.37 de 4.4 f<br />

Nkhotakota 861 fg 106 g 121 f 6.68 b 1.33 abc 1.07 f 7.0 c<br />

Thyolo 865 fg 161 e 104 i 5.18 j 1.57 a 1.47 bc 8.4 a<br />

Zomba 894 cd 210 b 122 ef 6.95 a 1.43 abc 1.30 e 4.9 e<br />

Cassava Gomani 921 b 237 a 124 de 5.52 hi 1.33 abc 0.87 g 3.7 hi<br />

Maunjili 883 de 177 d 129 ab 4.93 k 1.20 cd 1.40 cd 3.7 h<br />

Mbundumali 903 c 196 c 127 bc 5.43 i 1.27 bcd 1.10 f 3.5 j<br />

Mkondezi 851 g 194 c 128 bc 5.60 gh 0.30 e 1.10 f 3.9 g<br />

Sauti 900 cd 133 f 130 ab 5.70 g 1.33 abc 0.90 g 3.5 ij<br />

Corn – 947 a 202 bc 113 g 5.98 f 1.07 d 1.30 e 7.2 b<br />

Means followed by the same letter (a–k) within the same column are not significantly different from each other (P ≤ 0.05).<br />

∗ Values are means of three determinations.<br />

Protein<br />

(g kg −1 )<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896


Properties of Malawian cocoyam starches www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Mineral content (in mg kg −1 ) of the cocoyam, cassava and corn starches ∗<br />

Botanical<br />

source Accession/genotype P Ca K Mg Na Fe Zn Mn<br />

Cocoyam Chitipa 106.9abcd 48.0ef 368.8ab 30.0d 27.0de 9.3cd 2.09bcd 0.41cde Machinga 110.1abc 42.6efg 381.9a 40.3c 21.6e 8.5cde 2.35ab 0.43cd Mulanje 99.1cdef 29.0g 293.7c 30.9d 31.5bcd 6.2ef 1.29g 0.39de Mzuzu 116.2ab 26.0g 346.3b 20.9f 29.1cd 10.7bc 1.78def 0.43cd Nkhotakota 102.5bcde 28.7g 376.9ab 27.2de 26.0de 7.5de 1.76ef 0.39de Thyolo 92.7def 37.2fg 357.4ab 57.1a 51.3a 4.4f 2.54a 0.39de Zomba 105.8bcde 58.7de 288.3c 31.2d 51.9a 7.8de 1.56fg 0.79s Cassava Gomani 108.9abc 124.0b 64.1e 55.0a 57.2a 17.8a 2.11bc 0.75a Maunjili 86.9fg 85.9c 38.4e 47.1b 36.9b 12.2b 1.56fg 0.37de Mbundumali 92.2ef 141.7a 40.5e 4.3 32.3bcd 10.0bcd 2.06bcde 0.39de Mkondezi 67.3h 50.8def 32.0e 23.9ef 29.9bcd 7.9de 1.32g 0.35e Sauti 121.3a 132.3ab 42.6e 47.3b 31.4bcd 16.7a 1.42g 0.52b Corn – 75.9gh 67.1d 219.2d 37.8c 35.5bc 9.9bcd 1.82cdef 0.47bc Means followed by the same letter (a–h) within the same column are not significantly different from each other (P ≤ 0.05).<br />

∗ Values are means of three determinations.<br />

Table 3. Reducing capacity (RC), wavelength of maximum iodine absorption (λmax), blue values (BV) and the extent of acid hydrolysis of the<br />

cocoyam, cassava and corn starches ∗<br />

Extent of acid hydrolysis (%)<br />

Botanical source Accession/genotype λmax (nm) BV Reducing capacity Day 1 Day 2 Day 4 Day 6 Day 8 Day 12 Day 16<br />

Cocoyam Chitipa 605 a 0.365 bc 5.2 fg 2.2 c 3.5 cd 5.0 cd 7.8 a 9.2 cd 22.5 ab 24.8 cd<br />

Machinga 596 c 0.356 c 7.0 e 2.7 a 4.7 a 6.1 b 6.5 bc 10.9 a 23.6 a 25.8 bcd<br />

Mulanje 602 b 0.373 b 6.5 efg 2.2 c 4.2 b 4.9 cde 6.0 cde 9.8 bc 21.3 abc 24.0 de<br />

Mzuzu 594 c 0.333 d 5.0 g 1.6 e 4.0 b 5.5 c 8.2 a 10.1 abc 20.9 bcd 21.5 f<br />

Nkhotakota 588 d 0.334 d 7.4 e 1.9 d 4.0 b 5.0 cd 7.0 b 10.4 ab 20.2 bcde 21.9 ef<br />

Thyolo 603 b 0.372 bc 13.5 b 2.4 b 3.9 b 4.3 efg 7.9 a 10.9 a 19.3 cdef 25.0 bcd<br />

Zomba 607 a 0.408 a 5.6 fg 1.1 f 3.9 b 4.5 def 5.8 de 8.5 de 17.9 efg 20.4 f<br />

Cassava Gomani 574 g 0.250 f 10.8 c 1.0 g 2.6 f 3.9 fgh 6.2 cde 7.9 ef 17.3 fg 24.4 cd<br />

Maunjili 577 fg 0.265 f 6.6 ef 2.2 c 3.1 e 3.5 h 5.7 e 7.6 ef 15.7 g 28.0 a<br />

Mbundumali 579 ef 0.290 e 17.0 a 0.9 h 3.3 de 4.0 fgh 6.5 bc 7.5 f 17.3 fg 27.0 ab<br />

Mkondezi 576 fg 0.255 f 9.3 d 0.9 h 3.0 e 3.7 gh 6.3 cde 8.2 ef 18.6 def 26.5 abc<br />

Sauti 570 h 0.226 g 16.9 a 2.7 a 4.7 a 7.1 a 8.3 a 9.3 cd 21.5 abc 28.1 a<br />

Corn – 582 e 0.296 e 9.5 cd 0.6 i 3.2 e 5.4 c 7.8 a 9.2 cd 17.7 fg 25.1 bcd<br />

Means followed by the same letter (a–h) within the same column are not significantly different from each other (P ≤ 0.05) by LSD test.<br />

∗ All values are means of three replicates of each sample.<br />

and corn starches. 33 Mbundumali cassava starch exhibited the<br />

highest reducing capacity value while Mzuzu cocoyam starch gave<br />

the lowest. Cocoyam starches on average gave lower reducing<br />

capacity values than cassava and corn starches. This indicates the<br />

presence of starch molecules of higher molecular weights than<br />

cassava and corn starches as the reducing number is inversely<br />

related to the molecular weight. These results are consistent<br />

with the differences in iodine binding capacity of the starches<br />

and confirm the existence of structural differences between the<br />

cocoyam, cassava and corn starches. 17<br />

Acid hydrolysis<br />

The results of acid solubilisation revealed a steady increase in<br />

acid hydrolysis in the first 8 days with a large increase observed<br />

between 8 and 12 days of acid hydrolysis (Table 3). This pattern<br />

is different from one reported in literature. 34 The extent of<br />

acid hydrolysis differed significantly (P < 0.001) among the<br />

starches suggesting differences in the packing and orientation of<br />

starch chains in the amorphous regions of the different starches,<br />

however no consistent trends were observed. After 16 days of acid<br />

solubilisation,theextentofhydrolysisvariedfrom20.4%forZomba<br />

cocoyam starch to 28.1% for Sauti cassava starch. This range of<br />

values is lower than those reported for other root and tuber crops<br />

indicating much stronger chain interactions in the amorphous and<br />

crystalline regions of the Malawian cocoyam and cassava starches<br />

compared to other root and tuber crop starches reported. 35<br />

Molecular weight distribution of the starches<br />

The elution profiles of the standards showed a decrease in<br />

retention time with increasing molecular weight and the<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1889


1890<br />

(a) Chitipa<br />

(b) Machinga<br />

(c) Mzuzu<br />

(d) Nkhotakota<br />

www.soci.org DE Mweta et al.<br />

(e) Thyolo<br />

(f) Zomba<br />

(g) Gomani<br />

(h) Maunjili<br />

(i) Mbundumali<br />

(j) Mkondezi<br />

(k) Sauti<br />

(l) Corn<br />

Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of cocoyam (a–f), cassava (g–k) and corn (l) starch granules.<br />

associated calibration curve was strongly linear (R 2 = 0.9972).<br />

The chromatograms showed that the starches consisted of mainly<br />

two fractions: a higher molecular weight fraction (amylopectin)<br />

with elution time between 12 and 16 min, and a lower molecular<br />

weight fraction (amylose) eluted between 16 and 20 min (Fig. 2).<br />

The molecular weight averages, average molecular weight (Mw)<br />

and number-average molecular weight (Mn), and polydispersity<br />

indexes (PDIs) of the amylopectin and amylose fractions calculated<br />

using the calibration curve varied significantly with source of the<br />

starch (Table 5). Chitipa cocoyam starches exhibited the highest<br />

Mw and Mn values for the amylopectin molecules and Gomani<br />

cassava starch the lowest. In the amylose fraction, Gomani cassava<br />

starch gave the highest Mw and Mn values and Mzuzu cocoyam<br />

starch the lowest. Generally, cocoyam starches exhibited amylose<br />

molecules of lower molecular weight but amylopectin molecules<br />

of higher molecular weight than cassava and corn starches.<br />

The PDI values of amylose molecules were higher for cocoyam<br />

starches than corn and cassava starches; however, the amylopectin<br />

molecules of the starches displayed similar PDI values.<br />

This suggests differences in molecular weight distribution in the<br />

amylose molecules but a similar range of molecular weight distributions<br />

for the high molecular fraction. 21 The differences in the<br />

amylose and amylopectin molecular weight account for observed<br />

differences in reducing capacity values of the different starches.<br />

Morphological properties<br />

Cocoyam, cassava and corn starch granules displayed various<br />

shapes when viewed under scanning electron microscope (Fig. 1).<br />

Cocoyam starches exhibited round/spherical as well as polyhedral<br />

(polygonal) and truncated granules similar to those reported in<br />

literature. 7,10,36,37 Cassava starch granules were mostly rounded<br />

(spherical) and their surfaces were smooth with some portions<br />

being irregular, indicating fissures. Irregular with oval and<br />

truncated, ellipsoidal granules were also observed within the<br />

cassava starch samples. Corn starch granules were polygonal in<br />

shape.<br />

Cocoyam starches displayed smaller sized granules<br />

(9.4–10.4 µm) than cassava (11.4–12.9 µm) and corn starches<br />

(11.8 µm) (Table 4). The size range of cocoyam starches obtained<br />

is higher than those reported (0.05–0.08 µm, 2.96–5.19 µm<br />

and 0.5–5.0 µm) 4,10,37 while that of cassava starches is within<br />

the reported range (3–43 µm). 30 Cassava starches had mostly<br />

medium-sized granules (>60%) with Mbundumali having a larger<br />

fraction of its granules in this size range. Cocoyam starch had<br />

almost equal size distribution of small-sized and medium-sized<br />

granules except for Nkhotakota starch.<br />

Water absorption capacity and swelling power<br />

Water absorption capacity and swelling power were temperature<br />

dependent, increasing with rising temperature (Fig. 3a and b). The<br />

highest water absorption capacity was observed in Sauti, Maunjili<br />

and Mkondezi cassava starches at 50, 70 and 90 ◦ C, respectively,<br />

while the lowest was observed in Mzuzu and Nkhotakota cocoyam<br />

starches at 50 ◦ Cand70 ◦ C, respectively. Corn starch displayed the<br />

lowest water absorption capacity at 90 ◦ C. The same pattern<br />

was observed for swelling power of the starches. Cocoyam<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896


Properties of Malawian cocoyam starches www.soci.org<br />

Table 4. Granule size and size distribution the starches as determined by scanning electron microscopy<br />

Botanical source Accession/genotype Range Diameter<br />

Granule size (µm) Granule size distribution (%)<br />

Very small<br />

(0–5 µm)<br />

Small<br />

(5–10 µm)<br />

Medium<br />

(10–25 µm)<br />

Cocoyam Chitipa 4.0–18 10.3c 3 45 52 0<br />

Machinga 4.0–16 10.1cd 1 51 48 0<br />

Mulanje 5.3–16 10.4c 0 43 57 0<br />

Mzuzu 5.3–16 9.6de 0 56 44 0<br />

Nkhotakota 5.3–17 9.4e 0 65 35 0<br />

Thyolo 5.3–17 10.1cd 0 51 49 0<br />

Zomba 5.3–18 10.3c 0 51 49 0<br />

Cassava Gomani 6.7–20 11.8b 0 27 73 0<br />

Maunjili 5.3–21 12.0b 0 27 73 0<br />

Mbundumali 6.7–20 12.9a 0 17 83 0<br />

Mkondezi 6.7–22 12.7a 0 23 77 0<br />

Sauti 5.3–20 11.4b 0 33 67 0<br />

Corn 5.3–22 11.8b 0 33 67 0<br />

Means followed by the same letter (a–e) within the same column are not significantly different from each other (P ≤ 0.05)<br />

Large<br />

(>25 µm)<br />

Table 5. The average values and mean separation of average molecular weight (Mw), number-average molecular weight (Mn), and polydispersity<br />

index (PDI) of the amylopectin of the cocoyam, cassava starches and corn starches<br />

Botanical<br />

source<br />

Genotype/<br />

accession<br />

Mw × 10 6<br />

(g mol −1 )<br />

Fraction I (amylopectin) Fraction II (amylose)<br />

Mn × 10 6<br />

(g mol −1 ) PDI<br />

Mw × 10 5<br />

(g mol −1 )<br />

Mn × 10 5<br />

(g mol −1 ) PDI<br />

Cocoyam Chitipa 1.70 a 1.64 a 1.04 a 3.90 de 3.33 def 1.17 abc<br />

Machinga 1.56 abc 1.53 ab 1.02 bc 3.83 def 3.23 def 1.19 ab<br />

Mulanje 1.56 abc 1.51 ab 1.03 ab 3.71 ef 3.15 ef 1.18 abc<br />

Mzuzu 1.52 abc 1.47 ab 1.03 ab 3.62 f 3.04 f 1.19 ab<br />

Nkhotakota 1.66 ab 1.60 a 1.04 a 3.68 ef 3.09 f 2.00 a<br />

Thyolo 1.59 abc 1.56 ab 1.02 bc 4.02 cd 3.50 bcd 1.15 de<br />

Zomba 1.62 abc 1.59 ab 1.02 bc 4.01 cd 3.43 cde 1.17 abc<br />

Cassava Gomani 1.44 c 1.41 b 1.02 bc 4.38 a 3.83 ab 1.14 de<br />

Maunjili 1.57 abc 1.46 ab 1.02 bc 4.24 abc 3.71 abc 1.14 de<br />

Mbundumali 1.49 bc 1.47 ab 1.01 c 4.20 abc 3.74 abc 1.16 bcd<br />

Mkondezi 1.58 abc 1.51 ab 1.04 a 4.36 a 3.87 a 1.16 bcd<br />

Sauti 1.52 abc 1.49 ab 1.02 bc 4.30 ab 3.71 abc 1.13 e<br />

Corn – 1.57 abc 1.52 ab 1.03 ab 4.02 bcd 3.47 cde 1.16 bcd<br />

Means followed by the same letter (a–f) in the same column are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.<br />

Figure 2. Typical HPSEC chromatograms of the starches.<br />

starches generally displayed lower water absorption capacity<br />

and swelling power than cassava starches. Corn starch displayed<br />

water absorption and swelling capacity similar to that of cocoyam<br />

starches. The differences in the water absorption capacity could be<br />

due to differences in starch structure giving rise to varying internal<br />

associative forces maintaining granule structure and, degree of<br />

engagement to form hydrogen and covalent bonds between<br />

starch chains and hence the degree of availability of water binding<br />

sites. 38 Differences in granule size could also have contributed to<br />

the observed differences as starches with large granule size swell<br />

rapidly, increasing water retention. 39<br />

Solubility of the starches also increased with rising temperature<br />

(Fig. 3c). Cocoyam starches generally displayed higher solubility<br />

than cassava starches. This pattern disagrees with the water<br />

absorption and swelling behaviour of the cocoyam and cassava<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1891


1892<br />

Figure 3. Water absorption capacity, swelling power and solubility of the<br />

cocoyam, cassava and corn starch at 50, 70 and 90 ◦ C. Bars within the<br />

same series labelled with different letters are significantly different from<br />

each other (P = 0.05). (a) Water absorption capacity (g H2O g −1 starch).<br />

(b) Swelling power (g g −1 starch). (c) Solubility (g kg −1 ).<br />

starches.Itisexpectedthathigherswellingshouldresultinincrease<br />

in solubility as higher granule swelling permits exudation of<br />

amylose. The lower solubility of cocoyam starches compared to<br />

cassava starches could therefore be attributed to smaller granule<br />

sizes of the cocoyam starches. 40<br />

Paste clarity and viscosity<br />

Paste clarity and viscosity were the lowest in corn starch and<br />

highest in Mkondezi cassava starch (Fig. 4). Cocoyam starches<br />

exhibited lower paste clarity and viscosity than cassava starches.<br />

Thisisconsistentwithlowerswellingcapacityforcocoyamstarches<br />

than cassava starches observed earlier on. 41 Similar trends in paste<br />

clarity have been reported for cocoyam and cassava starches. 9<br />

It is reported that starches with low amylose content usually<br />

exhibit high paste clarity due to ease of dispersion of amylose<br />

molecules; 42 however, in this study, cocoyam starches displayed<br />

lower amylose contents but lower paste clarity than cassava<br />

www.soci.org DE Mweta et al.<br />

Paste clarity (%T)<br />

Viscosity (cP)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

(a)<br />

f<br />

Chitipa<br />

h<br />

Machinga<br />

(b)<br />

gh<br />

Chitipa<br />

g<br />

Mulanje<br />

gh<br />

Machinga<br />

gh<br />

Mulanje<br />

f<br />

Mzuzu<br />

e<br />

Mzuzu<br />

h<br />

Nkhotakota<br />

f<br />

Nkhotakota<br />

i<br />

Thyolo<br />

h<br />

Thyolo<br />

g<br />

Zomba<br />

gh<br />

Zomba<br />

e<br />

Gomani<br />

b<br />

Gomani<br />

a<br />

Maunjli<br />

d<br />

Maunjli<br />

d<br />

Mbundumali<br />

bc<br />

Mbundumali<br />

b<br />

Mkondezi<br />

a<br />

c<br />

Sauti<br />

c<br />

j<br />

Corn<br />

i<br />

Mkondezi<br />

Sauti<br />

Corn<br />

Figure 4. Paste clarity and viscosity of the cocoyam, cassava and corn<br />

starch pastes at 50 ◦ C. Bars labelled with different letters are significantly<br />

different from each other (P = 0.05). (a) Clarity (%T) ofstarchpastes.<br />

(b) Viscosity (cP) of starch pastes.<br />

starches. The low clarity of cocoyam starch pastes could therefore<br />

be due to the presence of amylose molecules of high susceptibility<br />

to retrogradation. 43<br />

Thermal properties of native and retrograded starches<br />

The thermal properties of the starches varied significantly (P <<br />

0.001) with source (Table 6). Cocoyam starches gave higher values<br />

of gelatinisation temperatures (61.8–83.7 ◦ C) and enthalpies<br />

(8.2–14.7 J g −1 ) than those reported in literature. 44 Cassava<br />

starches had gelatinisation temperatures (58.2–77.5 ◦ C) similar<br />

to those reported for cassava starch (61.55–72.94 ◦ C); however,<br />

the transition enthalpies (13.1–15.1 J g −1 ) were higher than the<br />

reported values of 10.4 J g −1 . 10 Cocoyam starches generally<br />

exhibited higher onset, peak and conclusion temperatures<br />

than cassava and corn starches indicating the presence of<br />

strong bonding forces within the granule interior of cocoyam<br />

starches. 45 These results also confirm structural differences among<br />

the starches under study as low gelatinisation temperatures<br />

are characteristic of starches with larger proportions of short<br />

amylopectin branch chains. 33,44 Cassava starches displayed higher<br />

values of gelatinisation temperature range than cocoyam and<br />

corn starches. This reflects on the differences in the distribution of<br />

starchgranules:themoreheterogeneousthegranules,thebroader<br />

the temperature range. 46 Higher amylopectin content can also<br />

lead to the narrowing of temperature range of gelatinisation. 47<br />

The differences in amylose/amylopectin ratio could also explain<br />

the differences in gelatinisation temperature range as cocoyam<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896


Properties of Malawian cocoyam starches www.soci.org<br />

Table 6. Thermal properties of the native and retrograded starches: onset (T0), peak (Tp) and conclusion (Tc) temperatures, temperature range (R),<br />

and transition energy (�HG) ∗<br />

Native starches Retrograded starches<br />

Botanical<br />

source Accession/genotype T0 ( ◦ C) Tp ( ◦ C) Tc ( ◦ C) R ( ◦ C) �HG (J g −1 ) T0 ( ◦ C) Tp ( ◦ C) Tc ( ◦ C) �HR (J g −1 )<br />

Degree of<br />

retrogradation (%)<br />

Cocoyam Chitipa 61.8 f 69.4 f 78.6 d 16.8 bc 14.2 abc 45.9 f 56.1 g 62.5 f 3.5 d 24.6 e<br />

Machinga 71.4 b 76.7 b 82.4 b 11.1 f 12.1 e 49.7 e 58.6 f 65.2 bc 5.0 b 41.5 b<br />

Mulanje 70.2 c 75.7 c 82.6 b 12.4 e 14.0 abc 51.2 d 59.3 cde 66.2 a 4.4 c 31.2 d<br />

Mzuzu 68.2 d 73.1 d 79.2 d 11.0 f 8.2 f 52.0 c 59.0 e 65.3 abc 3.8 d 45.7 a<br />

Nkhotakota 75.6 a 78.7 a 83.7 a 8.0 g 14.7 ab 51.8 c 59.7 bc 66.0 ab 5.4 a 37.0 c<br />

Thyolo 67.8 d 73.3 d 80.9 c 13.1 e 14.6 ab 52.5 bc 59.3 de 65.8 ab 4.2 c 28.8 d<br />

Zomba 71.2 b 76.4 b 82.5 b 11.3 f 13.8 bcd 52.9 b 60.4 a 66.1 ab 4.8 b 35.0 c<br />

Cassava Gomani 60.8 g 65.6 i 76.9 efg 16.1 c 14.0 abc 54.3 a 59.3 cde 63.4 ef 1.1 g 7.9 g<br />

Maunjili 58.2 j 67.4 h 77.5 e 19.3 a 15.1 a 54.6 a 59.7 bc 63.9 de 1.6 f 10.6 fg<br />

Mbundumali 62.1 f 68.6 g 76.2 g 14.1 d 13.4 cd 54.4 a 59.7 bc 64.0 de 1.6 f 11.9 f<br />

Mkondezi 60.2 h 65.7 i 76.8 efg 16.6 bc 13.1 cde 54.7 a 59.7 bc 63.7 de 1.4 fg 10.6 fg<br />

Sauti 59.1 i 65.4 i 76.4 fg 17.3 bc 14.1 abc 54.6 a 59.5 cd 63.8 de 1.1 g 7.9 g<br />

Corn – 66.2 e 70.9 e 76.9 ef 10.7 f 12.8 de 54.1 a 60.1 ab 64.6 cd 2.9 e 22.7 e<br />

Means followed by the same letter (a–j) within the same column are not significantly different from each other (P ≤ 0.05).<br />

∗ values are means of three replicates of each sample.<br />

starches generally displayed lower amylose content than cassava<br />

starches, hence higher amylopectin content.<br />

The retrograded starches gave lower gelatinisation temperatures<br />

and enthalpy indicating weaker starch crystallinity (Table 6).<br />

Cocoyam starches displayed higher enthalpies of retrogradation,<br />

consistent with higher levels of retrogradation than cassava and<br />

corn starches. The degree of retrogradation ranged from 24.6 to<br />

45.7%, and 7.9 to 11.9% within the cocoyam and cassava starches,<br />

respectively. Corn starch displayed the degree of retrogradation<br />

of 22.7%. The differences in the retrogradation tendencies of the<br />

starch confirm structural differences among the starches as lower<br />

degree of retrogradation is attributed to higher content of short<br />

branches of amylopectin chains and long amylose molecules. 48<br />

Pearson correlation coefficients between different properties<br />

of starches<br />

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the relationship between<br />

various properties of starches from cocoyam, cassava and corn<br />

are presented in Table 7. Granule size exhibited a significant<br />

positive correlation with Ca (r = 0.71, P < 0.01), AM (r = 0.61,<br />

P < 0.05), WAC (r = 0.74, P < 0.01), SP (r = 0.71, P < 0.01),<br />

PV (r = 0.63, P < 0.05), and PC (r = 0.65, P < 0.05), and a<br />

negative correlation with ash (r =−0.65, P < 0.05), K (r =−0.91,<br />

P < 0.01), gelatinisation parameters, T0 and Tp (r =−0.76, −0.78,<br />

P < 0.01), �HR (r =−0.86, P < 0.01), Retro (r =−0.85, P < 0.01)<br />

and BV (r =−0.72, P < 0.01). This agrees with Amani et al. 49<br />

who reported positive correlations of granule size with amylose<br />

content, paste clarity and swelling power for yams grown in Ivory<br />

Coast. Amylose content is one important characteristic that affects<br />

starch functionality. Positive significant correlation of amylose<br />

content with hot-paste viscosity, and negative correlation with<br />

swelling power, solubility and paste clarity have been reported<br />

for potato and amaranthus starches. 50,51 However, in this study,<br />

no significant correlation was observed between amylose content<br />

and the functional properties of the starches. Similar observations<br />

were reported by Wickramasinghe et al. 3 who found no significant<br />

correlation between amylose content and thermal and pasting<br />

characteristics of starches isolated from root and tuber crops<br />

grown in Sri Lanka. Ash content showed a positive correlation<br />

with P (r = 0.78, P < 0.01) and K contents (r = 0.56, P < 0.05).<br />

Ca had a significant positive correlation with WAC, SP, PV and PC<br />

but a negative correlation with gelatinisation temperatures (T0<br />

and Tp) and degree of retrogradation whereas potassium showed<br />

positive correlation with gelatinisation temperatures and degree<br />

of retrogradation but a negative correlation with WAC, SP, PV<br />

and PC. Contrarily, Zaidul et al. 52 reported a negative correlation<br />

between peak viscosity determined by RVA and calcium content<br />

but positive correlation of the same with potassium content for<br />

potato starches.<br />

There were significant inter-relationships between gelatinisation<br />

and retrogradation parameters. T0 and Tp were positively<br />

correlated (r = 0.97, P < 0.01) and both were also positively<br />

correlated with Tc (r = 0.90, 0.94, P < 0.01). Similar positive<br />

relationships between T0, Tp and Tc have been reported for<br />

amaranthus 51 and corn starches. 53 T0, Tp and Tc were all positively<br />

correlated with retrogradation parameters, �HR (r = 0.94,<br />

0.97, 0.94, P < 0.01) and Retro (r = 0.88, 0.90, 0.80, P < 0.01);<br />

however, they were not significantly correlated with �HG. Weak<br />

relationship between �HG with T0, Tp and Tc or lack of it is attributed<br />

to the fact that enthalpy of gelatinisation is essentially due<br />

to hydrogen bonding not crystallinity. 54 T0, Tp and Tc were negatively<br />

correlated with WAC (r =−0.98, −0.95, −0.90, P < 0.01),<br />

SP (r =−0.97, −0.95, −0.88, P < 0.01), PV (r =−0.65, −0.72,<br />

−0.61, P < 0.05; r =−0.72, P < 0.01) and PC (r =−0.77, −0.73,<br />

−0.61, P < 0.01). SP, WAC, PC and PV were all positively correlated<br />

with each other.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The study has revealed differences in physicochemical properties<br />

of starches from different cocoyam accessions and with those of<br />

cassava and corn starches. Cocoyam starches generally exhibited<br />

higher pH, ash, fat, protein, potassium and phosphorus levels but<br />

lower amylose and calcium levels than cassava starches. Cocoyam<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1893


1894<br />

Table 7. Pearson correlation coefficients for physicochemical properties of the cocoyam, cassava and corn starches<br />

GS Ash P Ca K Am T0 Tp Tc �HG �HR Retro WAC SP PV PC<br />

www.soci.org DE Mweta et al.<br />

Ash −0.65∗ – – – – – – – – – – – – – –<br />

P −0.66∗ 0.78∗∗ – – – – – – – – – – – – – –<br />

Ca 0.71∗∗ −0.07 −0.18 – – – – – – – – – – – – –<br />

K −0.91∗∗ 0.56∗ 0.58∗ −0.80∗∗ – – – – – – – – – – – –<br />

Am 0.61∗ −0.29 −0.05 0.48 −0.50 – – – – – – – – – – –<br />

T0 −0.76∗∗ 0.42 0.41 −0.67∗ 0.81∗∗ −0.47 – – – – – – – – – –<br />

Tp −0.78∗∗ 0.50 0.45 −0.70∗∗ 0.84∗∗ −0.52 0.97∗∗ – – – – – – – – –<br />

Tc −0.81∗∗ 0.45 0.52 −0.71∗∗ 0.79∗∗ −0.56∗ 0.90∗∗ 0.94∗∗ – – – – – – – –<br />

�HG 0.22 −0.07 −0.07 0.27 −0.24 0.01 −0.18 −0.13 0.05 – – – – – – –<br />

�HR −0.86∗∗ 0.50 0.51 −0.78∗∗ 0.93∗∗ −0.52 0.94∗∗ 0.97∗∗ 0.94∗∗ −0.13 – – – – –<br />

Retro −0.85∗∗ −0.50 0.50 −0.78∗∗ 0.90∗∗ −0.48 0.88∗∗ 0.90∗∗ 0.80∗∗ −0.50 0.92∗∗ – – – – –<br />

WAC 0.74∗∗ −0.38 −0.38 0.67∗ −0.80∗∗ 0.47 −0.98∗∗ −0.95∗∗ −0.90∗∗ 0.09 −0.93∗∗ −0.83∗∗ – – – –<br />

SP 0.71∗∗ −0.36 −0.35 0.58∗ −0.77∗∗ 0.46 −0.97∗∗ −0.95∗∗ −0.88∗∗ 0.09 −0.91∗∗ −0.82∗∗ 1.00∗∗ – – –<br />

PV 0.63∗ −0.48 −0.31 0.62∗ −0.81∗∗ 0.34 −0.65∗ −0.72∗∗ −0.61∗ 0.02 −0.78∗∗ −0.68∗ 0.72∗∗ 0.71∗∗ – –<br />

PC 0.65∗ −0.46 −0.39 0.58∗ 0.84∗∗ 0.20 −0.77∗∗ −0.73∗∗ −0.61∗ 0.16 −0.77∗∗ −0.70∗∗ 0.80∗∗ 0.88∗∗ 0.84∗∗ –<br />

BV −0.72∗∗ 0.52 0.62∗ −0.69∗∗ −0.85∗∗ −0.28 0.75∗∗ 0.83∗∗ 0.80∗∗ −0.08 0.88∗∗ 0.79∗∗ −0.73 −0.70∗∗ −0.76∗∗ −0.67∗ www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896<br />

GS, granule size; P, phosphorus; Ca, calcium; K, potassium; Am, amylose; T0, onset gelatinisation temperature; Tp, peak gelatinisation temperature; �HG, enthalpy of gelatinisation; �HR, enthalpy of<br />

retrogradation; Retro, degree of retrogradation; WAC, water absorption capacity at 70 ◦ C; SP, swelling power at 70 ◦ C, PV, apparent viscosity; PC, paste clarity; BV, blue value.<br />

∗ Significant at P < 0.05, and ∗∗ significant at P < 0.01.


Properties of Malawian cocoyam starches www.soci.org<br />

starches displayed smaller-sized granules than cassava and corn<br />

starches. Cocoyam starches have different structures from cassava<br />

and corn starches as evidenced by differences in the wavelength<br />

of maximum iodine absorption, blue value, reducing capacity,<br />

extent of acid hydrolysis and the carbohydrate profiles. Cocoyam<br />

starches had higher gelatinisation temperatures and solubility<br />

but lower water absorption capacity and swelling power, paste<br />

clarity and viscosity but higher solubility than cassava and corn<br />

starches. Cocoyam starches also displayed higher retrogradation<br />

tendencies than cassava starches.<br />

ACKNOWLEDEGMENTS<br />

The authors would like to thank International Programme in<br />

Chemical Sciences (IPICS), Uppsala University in Sweden for<br />

financing this research through the Malawi 01 ‘Genetics and<br />

Chemistry of Root and Tuber Crops’ project.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 FAO Statistics, Food and Agriculture Organization, Data base<br />

results, (2003).<br />

2 Sandifolo VS, Paper 15: Estimation of crop losses due to<br />

different causes in root and tuber crops: The case of<br />

Malawi, Proceedings of the Expert Consultation on root crop<br />

statistics, Harare, Zimbabwe, 3–6 December (2002). Available:<br />

http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/Y9422E/y9422e0f.htm [12 June<br />

2007].<br />

3 Wickramasinghe HAM, Takigawa S, Matsuura-Endo C, Yamauchi H<br />

and Noda T, Comparative analysis of starch properties of different<br />

root and tuber crops of Sri Lanka. Food Chem 112:98–103 (2009).<br />

4 Moorthy SN, Pillai PKT and Unnikrishnan M, Variability in starch<br />

extracted from taro. Carbohydr Polym 20:169–173 (1993).<br />

5 Subhashirasakul S, Yuenyoungsawad S, Ketjinda W, Phadoongsombut<br />

N and Faroongsang D, Study on tablet binding and disintegrating<br />

properties of alternative starches prepared from taro and<br />

sweetpotato tubers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 27:81–87 (2001).<br />

6 Ellis RP, Cochrane MP, Dale MFB, Duffus CM, Lynn A, Morrison IM, et al,<br />

Starch production and industrial use. J Sci Food Agric 77:289–311<br />

(1998).<br />

7 Jane J, Shen L, Chen J, Lim S, Kasemsuwan T and Nip WK, Physical<br />

and chemical studies of taro starches and flours. Cereal Chem<br />

69:528–535 (1992).<br />

8 Aboubakar • Njitang YN, Scher J and Mbofung CMF, Physicochemical,<br />

thermal properties and microstructure of six varieties of taro<br />

(Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) flours and starches, J Food Eng<br />

86:294–305 (2008).<br />

9 Nwokocha LM, Aviara NA, Senan C and Williams PA, A comparative<br />

study of some properties of cassava (Manihot esculenta, Crantz)<br />

and cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta, Linn) starches. Carbohydr Polym<br />

76:362–367 (2009).<br />

10 Pérez E, Schultz FS and de Delahaye EP, Characterisation of some<br />

properties of starches isolated from Xanthosoma sagittifolium<br />

(tannia)and Colocasiaesculenta(taro). CarbohydrPolym60:139–145<br />

(2005).<br />

11 Benesi IRM, Labuschagne MT, Dixon AGO and Mahungu NM, Stability<br />

of native starch quality parameters, starch extraction and root dry<br />

matter of cassava genotypes in different environments. J Sci Food<br />

Agric 84:1381–1388 (2004).<br />

12 McCleary BV, Solah V and Gibson TS, Quantitative measurement of<br />

total starch in cereal flours and products. J Cereal Sci 20:51–58<br />

(1994).<br />

13 Njoku PC and Ohia CC, Spectrophotometric estimation studies of<br />

mineral nutrient in three cocoyam cultivars. Pak J Nutr 6:616–619<br />

(2007).<br />

14 Lindeboom N, Chang PR and Tyler RT, Analytical, biochemical and<br />

physicochemical aspects of starch granule size, with emphasis on<br />

small granule starches: A review. Starch/Stärke 56:89–99 (2004).<br />

15 Singh N, Inouchi N and Nishinari K, Morphological, structural, thermal,<br />

and rheological characteristics of starches separated from apples<br />

of different cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 53:10193–10199 (2005).<br />

16 Hizukuri S, Takeda Y, Yasuda M and Suzuki A, Multibranched nature<br />

of amylose and the action of debranching enzymes. Carbohydr Res<br />

94:205–213 (1981).<br />

17 Van Hung P and Morita N, Physicochemical properties and enzymatic<br />

digestibility of starch from edible canna (Canna edulis) grownin<br />

Vietnam. Carbohydr Polym 61:314–321 (2005).<br />

18 Jayakody L, Hoover R, Liu Q and Donner E, Studies on tuber starches II.<br />

Molecular structure, composition and physicochemical properties<br />

of yam (Dioscorea sp.) starches grown in Sri Lanka. Carbohydr Polym<br />

69:148–163 (2007).<br />

19 Brook JR, Griffin VK and Kattan W, A modified method for total<br />

carbohydrate analysis of glucose syrups, maltodextrins and other<br />

starch hydrolysis products. Cereal Chem 63:465–467 (1986).<br />

20 Chung Y-L and Lai H-M, Molecular and granular characteristics of<br />

corn starch modified by HCl–methanol method at different<br />

temperatures. Carbohydr Polym 63:527–534 (2006).<br />

21 Lehtonen P, Effect of method of solution on observed molecular<br />

weight distribution of barley starch and starch derivatives in size<br />

exclusion chromatography. Chromatographia 26:157–159 (1988).<br />

22 Mishra S and Rai T, Morphology and functional properties of corn,<br />

potato and tapioca starches. Food Hydrocolloids 20:557–566 (2006).<br />

23 Kojima M, Shimizu H, Ohashi M and Ohba K, Physico-chemical<br />

properties and digestibility of pulse starch after four different<br />

treatments. J Appl Glycosci 53:105–110 (2006).<br />

24 Craig SAS, Maningat CC, Seib PA and Hoseney RC, Starch paste clarity.<br />

Cereal Chem 66:173–182 (1989).<br />

25 International Starch Institute, ISI 17-1e: Determination of<br />

viscosity of starch by Brookfield Viscometer (2002). Available:<br />

http://www.starch.dk/isi/methods/17brookfield.htm [17 January<br />

2008].<br />

26 Peroni FH, Rocha TS and Franco CM, Some structural and<br />

physicochemical characteristics of tuber and root starches. Food<br />

Sci Technol Int 12:505–512 (2006).<br />

27 Rondán-Sanabria GG and Finardi-Filho F, Physical–chemical and<br />

functional of maca root starch (Lepidium meyenii Walpers). Food<br />

Chem 114:492–498 (2009).<br />

28 Boudries N, Belhaneche N, Nadjemi B, Deroanne C, Mathlouthi M,<br />

Roger B, et al, Physicochemical and functional properties of starches<br />

from sorghum cultivated in the Sahara of Algeria. Carbohydr Polym<br />

78:475–480 (2009).<br />

29 Torruco-Uco JG and Betancur-Ancona D, Physicochemical and<br />

functional properties of Makal (Xanthosoma yucatanensis) starch.<br />

Food Chem 101:1319–1326 (2007).<br />

30 Moorthy SN, Physicochemical and functional properties of tropical<br />

tuber starches: A review. Starch/Stärke 54:559–593 (2002).<br />

31 Moore CO, Tuschhoff JV, Hastings CW and Schanefelt RV, Applications<br />

of starches in foods, in Starch: Chemistry and Technology, ed.<br />

by Whistler RL, Bemiller JN and Pascall EF. Academic Press Inc.,<br />

Orlando, FL, pp. 575–591 (1984).<br />

32 Pérez E and Lares M, Chemical composition, mineral profile, and<br />

functional properties of canna (Canna edulis) and arrowroot<br />

(Maranta spp)starches.Plant Food Hum Nutr 60:113–116 (2005).<br />

33 Tetchi FA, Rolland-Sabaté A, Amani NG and Colona P, Molecular and<br />

physicochemical characterization of starches from yam, cocoyam,<br />

cassava, sweetpotato and ginger produced in Ivory Coast. J Sci Food<br />

Agric 87:1906–1916 (2007).<br />

34 Hoover R, Acid-treated starches, Food Rev Int 16:369–392 (2000).<br />

35 Jayakody L, Hoover R, Liu Q and Weber E, Studies on tuber and root<br />

starches. I. Structure and physicochemical properties of innala<br />

(Solenostemon rotundifolius) starches grown in Sri Lanka. Food Res<br />

Int 38:615–629 (2005).<br />

36 Huang C-C, Physicochemical, pasting and thermal properties of tuber<br />

starches as modified by guar gum and locust bean gum. Int J Food<br />

Sci Technol 44:50–58 (2008).<br />

37 Sefa-Dedeh S and Kofi-Agyir Sackey E, Starch structure and some<br />

properties of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium and Colocasia<br />

esculenta) starch and raphides. Food Chem 79:435–444 (2002).<br />

38 Hoover R and Sosulski F, Effect of cross linking on functional properties<br />

of legume starches. Starch/Stärke 38:149–155 (1986).<br />

39 Akalu G, Tufvesson F, Jonsson C and Nair BM, Physicochemical<br />

characteristics and functional properties of starch and dietary fibre<br />

in grass pea seeds. Starch/Stärke 50:374–382 (1998).<br />

40 Tian SJ, Rickard JE and Blanshard JM, Physicochemical properties of<br />

sweet potato starch. J Sci Food Agric 57:451–491 (1991).<br />

41 Hoover R, Sailaja Y and Solsuski F, Characterization of starches from<br />

wild and long grain brown rice. Food Res Int 29:99–107 (1996).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1895


1896<br />

42 Wang LZ and White PJ, Structure and physicochemical properties<br />

of starches from oats with different lipid content. Cereal Chem<br />

71:443–450 (1994).<br />

43 Mélo EA, Stamford TLM, Silva MPC, Krieger N and Stamford NP,<br />

Functional properties of yam bean (Pachyrizus erosus) starch.<br />

Bioresource Technol 89:103–106 (2003).<br />

44 Jane J, Chen YY, Lee LF, McPherson AE, Wong KS and Radosavljevic M,<br />

Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content<br />

on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem<br />

76:629–637 (1999).<br />

45 Tester RF and Morrison WR, Swelling and gelatinization of cereal<br />

starches. I. Effects of amylopectin, amylose and lipids. Cereal Chem<br />

60:551–557 (1990).<br />

46 Sandhu KS, Singh N and Malhi NS, Physicochemical and thermal<br />

properties of starches separated from corn produced from crosses<br />

of two germ pools. Food Chem 89:541–548 (2005).<br />

47 Krueger BR, Knutson CA, Inglett GE and Walker CE, A differential<br />

scanning calorimetry study on the effect of annealing on<br />

gelatinization behaviour of corn starch. J Food Sci 52:715–718<br />

(1987).<br />

48 Spence KE and Jane J, Chemical and physical properties of ginkgo<br />

(Ginkgo biloba)starch.Carbohydr Polym 40:261–269 (1999).<br />

www.soci.org DE Mweta et al.<br />

49 Amani N’GG, Buleon A, Kamenan A and Collona P, Variability in starch<br />

physicochemical and functional properties of yam (Dioscorea sp.)<br />

cultivated in Ivory Coast. J Sci Food Agric 84:2085–2096 (2004).<br />

50 Kaur A, Singh N, Ezekiel R and Guraya HS, Physicochemical, thermal<br />

and pasting properties of starches separated from different potato<br />

cultivars grown at different locations. Food Chem 101:643–645<br />

(2007).<br />

51 Kong X, Bao J and Corke H, Physical properties of Amaranthus starch.<br />

Food Chem 113:371–376 (2009).<br />

52 Zaidul ISM, Norulaini N, Omar MOK, Yamauchi H and Noda T,<br />

Correlations of the composition, minerals, and RVA pasting<br />

properties of various potato starches. Starch/Stärke 59:269–276<br />

(2007).<br />

53 Sandhu KS and Singh N, Some properties of corn starches II:<br />

Physicochemical, gelatinisation, retrogradation, pasting and gel<br />

textural properties. Food Chem 101:1499–1507 (2007).<br />

54 Singh J, McCarthy OJ and Singh H, Physico-chemical and<br />

morphological characteristics of New Zealand Taewa (Maori potato)<br />

starches. Carbohydr Polym 64:569–581 (2006).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1886–1896


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 24 December 2009 Revised: 30 April 2010 Accepted: 04 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 14 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4030<br />

A 75% reduction in herbicide use through<br />

integration with sorghum+sunflower extracts<br />

for weed management in wheat<br />

Muhammad Naeem Mushtaq, ∗,† Zahid Ata Cheema, Abdul Khaliq<br />

and M Rashid Naveed<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: To reduce herbicide use by 75%, integrated use of sorghum and sunflower extracts each at 18 L ha −1 combined<br />

with 1/4 th (75% less) of label rates of four herbicides (mesosulfuron+idosulfuron, metribuzin, phenoxaprop-p-ethyl and<br />

isoproturon) were investigated for the management of wild oat and canary grass, the two pernicious weeds in wheat fields<br />

worldwide.<br />

RESULTS: The results revealed that sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th (75% less) of label rates of herbicides<br />

inhibited dry matter production of wild oat by up to 89% and canary grass by up to 92%. The wild oat and canary grass<br />

persistence index in sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th (75% less) of label rates of herbicides was either lower or<br />

equal to respective label rates of herbicides, except sorghum+sunflower extract+1/4 th phenoxaprop-p-ethyl. Lower herbicide<br />

rates+water extracts also produced wheat grain yield statistically equal with label rates of respective herbicides. Two treatments<br />

having water extracts+lower herbicides rates were economical and sorghum+sunflower+1/4 th mesosulfuron+idosulfuron<br />

produced the highest (4404%) marginal rate of return.<br />

CONCLUSION: Herbicides use can be reduced by 75% through integration with sorghum+sunflower extracts without<br />

compromising yield and net benefits for cost-effective and eco-friendly management of wild oat and canary grass in wheat.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: wheat; reduce herbicide use; integrated weed management; allelopathy; Avena fatua; Phalaris minor<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Crop production has been facing a menace from weeds in terms<br />

of growth and yield reduction since the start of agriculture. Weeds<br />

reduce the yield of all crops by competing for growth factors<br />

and inhibiting crop growth through release of phytotoxins. 1<br />

With the advent of the green revolution in the 1960s and<br />

increased demand for food, herbicide use has been increased<br />

many fold in the last few decades. Of the total pesticides<br />

used worldwide, herbicides accounts for 37%, while 24%, 9%<br />

and 29% are insecticides, fungicides and others, respectively. 2<br />

Although herbicides are efficient for weed control, continuous<br />

use has caused the development of resistance in weeds against<br />

several herbicides. Presently, 332 herbicide resistant biotypes<br />

including 189 species (113 broad-leaved and 76 grasses) have<br />

been reported in more than 0.30 million fields worldwide. 3<br />

Furthermore, herbicides also pollute the soil, water and aerial<br />

environments and herbicide residues in food have deteriorated<br />

food quality and enhanced the risk of disease. 4 Therefore, there<br />

is growing public as well as scientific concern about the use<br />

of herbicides. Although herbicide use cannot be completely<br />

eliminated due to dire need of food for an ever increasing<br />

world population, the use of herbicides may be reduced<br />

through using integrated weed management approaches in<br />

field crops. 5<br />

Allelopathy, a phenomenon in which one plant inhibits growth<br />

of other plants through release of allelochemicals, has been<br />

accepted as a viable option in recent years, for reducing herbicide<br />

use to obtain eco-friendly and cost-effective weed control. 6,7<br />

Combined use of allelopathic extracts (sorghum, sunflower or<br />

brassica) and lower rates of herbicides has successfully been<br />

reduced the herbicides use by up to 50% in field crops, mung bean<br />

(Vigna radiata) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). 8,9<br />

Sorghum and sunflower are well studied allelopathic crops. 10<br />

Many allelochemicals responsible for inhibitory action of these<br />

two crops have been identified. Sorghum contains gallic acid,<br />

protocateuic acid, syringic acid, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic<br />

acid, p-coumaric acid, benzoic acid, ferulic acid, m-coumaric<br />

acid, caffeic acids, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde and sorgoleone. 11,12<br />

Sunflower possesses chlorogenic acid, isochlorogenic acid, αnaphthol,<br />

scopolin and annuionones. 13–15<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Muhammad Naeem Mushtaq, Department of Agronomy,<br />

University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.<br />

E-mail: mnmushtaq@gmail.com<br />

† Presentaddress:GraduateSchoolofLifeandEnvironmentalSciences,University<br />

of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8572, Ibaraki, Japan.<br />

DepartmentofAgronomy,UniversityofAgriculture,Faisalabad38040,Pakistan<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1897


1898<br />

A significant quantity of total herbicides is used for weed<br />

control in wheat crops worldwide, while in Pakistan, 63% of the<br />

total herbicides are used for weed control in wheat (M. Ashiq,<br />

personal communication). Wild oat and canary grass are the two<br />

pernicious weeds of wheat worldwide, each causing a reduction<br />

in yield of, on average, 30%. 16–18 Herbicide use can be reduced<br />

by up to 50% through combined use of herbicide and 250%<br />

sorghum extract at 12 L ha −1 for weed control in wheat. 19 There<br />

is a need to further reduce herbicide use for sustainable and<br />

economical weed control. Herbicide use may be further decreased<br />

by following two approaches: (1) increasing rate of allelopathic<br />

extracts, and (2) using a mixture of two allelopathic crop extracts.<br />

In this research, these approaches were combined to explore the<br />

possibility of reducing herbicide use by 75%. Recently, sorghum<br />

and sunflower allelopathic extracts have shown inhibitory effects<br />

against grassy weeds. 7 The authors are not aware of any report<br />

on integrated use of sorghum+sunflower extracts and 1/4 th (75%<br />

less) of label rates of herbicides for control of wild oat and canary<br />

grass in wheat. The present study was therefore conducted to<br />

investigate the possibility of reducing herbicides use by 75%,<br />

when employed in combination with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor<br />

L. Moench) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) extracts for wild<br />

oat and canary grass management in wheat (Triticum aestivum<br />

L.) fields.<br />

EXPERIMENTAL<br />

Site and crop husbandry<br />

Two years field experiment was conducted during 2006–2007 and<br />

2007–2008 at Agronomic research Area, University of Agriculture,<br />

Faisalabad, Pakistan (31.25 ◦ N, 73.09 ◦ E, and 184 m) where a history<br />

of the field showed infestation of wild oat and canary grass. Wheat<br />

(Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar Auqab-2000 was sown in winter on<br />

30 November 2006 and 5 December 2007 during the first and<br />

second years, respectively. A soaking irrigation was applied before<br />

preparing the seed bed. The crop was planted in 22 cm between<br />

rows with a single row hand-drill using a seed rate of 125 kg<br />

ha −1 . The plot size was 2.2 m × 5 m. A basal dose of nitrogen<br />

and phosphorus (100 kg N and 115 kg P2O5 ha −1 ) was applied<br />

at the time of sowing in the form of urea and diammonium<br />

phosphate, respectively. The whole quantity of phosphorus and<br />

half of nitrogen was broadcast at the time of sowing, while the<br />

remaining half of the nitrogen was top dressed 50 days after<br />

sowing (DAS). The first irrigation was applied 25 DAS, while<br />

subsequent irrigations were managed as and when needed by<br />

the crop. The crop was harvested manually 135 and 130 DAS<br />

during the first and second years, respectively.<br />

Preparation of extracts<br />

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and sunflower (Helianthus<br />

annuus L.)above-groundbiomass were harvestedfrom Agronomic<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. The<br />

herbage of both crops were dried and stored under shade to<br />

avoid possible leaching by rain water. Both plant materials were<br />

chopped with an electric fodder cutter into pieces of 2–3 cm<br />

each. The chopped material was soaked in water (100 g L −1 )at<br />

room temperature (21 ◦ C ± 2 ◦ C) for 24 h. The soaked material<br />

was filtered through 10 and 60 mesh sieve to obtain the extract.<br />

These extracts were boiled at 100 ◦ C to reduce the extract volume<br />

by 95% for easy handling and field application. After boiling, the<br />

concentration of water extracts was 250%. The boiling did not<br />

affect nature, concentration and efficacy of allelochemicals. 7,20,21<br />

www.soci.org MN Mushtaq et al.<br />

Application of treatments<br />

Sorghum and sunflower water extracts each at 18 L ha −1 were<br />

combined with 1/4 th of label rates of four herbicides, viz.<br />

mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) at 3.6 g a.i. ha −1 ,<br />

metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) at 43.75 g a.i. ha −1 , phenoxaprop-pethyl<br />

(Puma Super 7.5-EW) at 23.44 g a.i. ha −1 and isoproturon<br />

(Partner 50-WP) at 250 g a.i. ha −1 at the time of application.<br />

Full rates of herbicides as mesosulfuron+idosulfuron at 14.4 g<br />

a.i. ha −1 , metribuzin at 175 g a.i. ha −1 , phenoxaprop-p-ethyl at<br />

93.75 g a.i. ha −1 and isoproturon at 1000 g a.i. ha −1 were used as<br />

standard. A control (weedy check) was maintained for comparison.<br />

All treatments including water extracts+1/4 th rates of herbicides<br />

and label rates of herbicides were sprayed in the respective plots<br />

35 DAS. The volume of the spray (330 L ha −1 ) was determined by<br />

calibration. 22 Spraying was done with a Knapsack hand-sprayer<br />

fitted with a T-Jet nozzle maintaining a pressure of 207 kPa. All<br />

treatments were applied during both years of experimentation.<br />

Data collection<br />

Data on wild oat and canary grass density and dry matter<br />

production were recorded 70 DAS. A quadrate measuring<br />

0.50 × 0.50 m was placed randomly at two places in each<br />

experimental unit. The above-ground biomass of both weeds<br />

inside the quadrates was harvested. After counting, weeds were<br />

placed in an oven at 70 ◦ C for 72 h to obtain the dry weight. The<br />

data of two quadrates were averaged. Weed persistence index<br />

(WI) was calculated by following equation:<br />

WI =<br />

Weed density of control Weed dry matter of treatment<br />

×<br />

Weed density of treatment Weed dry matter of control<br />

The number of fertile tillers of wheat was counted at the time of<br />

harvesting. A quadrate measuring 1 m × 1mwasplacedrandomly<br />

in each plot. The fertile tillers inside the quadrate were counted. A<br />

spike-bearing tiller was considered as fertile. For number of grains<br />

per spike, ten plants were selected at random from each plot. Each<br />

spike was threshed individually to count the number of grains. The<br />

data of ten plants were averaged. After manual harvesting, the<br />

grain yield of each plot was weighed in kilograms and expressed as<br />

mega gram per hectare (Mg ha −1 ), then 1000 grains were selected<br />

randomly from the yield of each plot and weighed.<br />

Statistical and economic analyses<br />

The experiment was conducted in a randomised complete block<br />

design with four replications. ANOVA was performed using Fisher’s<br />

analysis of variance technique while multiple comparison among<br />

treatment means was made using least significance difference test<br />

at P < 0.05. 23 Economic and marginal analyses were carried out<br />

using the method devised by CIMMYT. 24<br />

RESULTS<br />

Effect of various treatments on density and dry matter<br />

production of wild oat and canary grass<br />

All treatments significantly (P < 0.05) reduced the density of<br />

wild oat and canary grass as compared with control (Table 1).<br />

Sorghum+sunflower water extracts each at 18 L ha −1 combined<br />

with 1/4 th (75% less) of label rates of herbicides inhibited wild oat<br />

density by 25–75% and 70–74% during the first and second years<br />

of experimentation, respectively. The label (full) rates of herbicides<br />

reduced density of wild oat by 38–75% and 79–81% during the<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904


Integrated use of allelopathic extracts reduce herbicide use www.soci.org<br />

Table 1. Effect of sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th rates of herbicides on density of wild oat and canary grass<br />

Density (m 2 )<br />

Wild oat Canary grass<br />

Extract/herbicide Rate (ha −1 ) 2006–2007 2007–2008 2006–2007 2007–2008<br />

Control (weedy check) – 2.00 a 10.75 a 11.7 a 9.75 a<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) Each at 18 L+3.6 g a.i. 0.50 c (75) 2.75 bc (74) 2.75 e (76) 5.25 b (46)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+43.75 g a.i 1.50 b (25) 2.75 bc (74) 8.5 b (27) 3.25 d (67)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super 7.5-EW) Each at 18 L+93.75 g a.i. 0.50 c (75) 3.25 b (70) 3.25de (72) 4.25 c (56)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+250 g a.i. 1.50 b (25) 2.75 bc (74) 4.75 c (59) 2.75 de (72)<br />

Mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) Each at 18 L+14.4 g a.i. 1.25 b (38) 2.25 c (79) 1.00 f (91) 2.00 fg (79)<br />

Metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+175 g a.i. 0.50 c (75) 2.00 c (81) 1.00 f (91) 2.00 fg (79)<br />

Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super 7.5-EW) Each at 18 L+315 g a.i. 0.50 c (75) 2.25 c (79) 0.00 g (100) 1.50 g (85)<br />

Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+1000 g a.i. 0.50 c (75) 2.00 c (81) 3.50 d (70) 2.50 df (74)<br />

Values in parenthesis show % inhibition in density as compared with control.<br />

Values having a different letter in a column differ significantly according to least significant difference test (LSD) at P < 0.05.<br />

a.i. = active ingredient.<br />

Table 2. Effect of sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th rates of herbicides on dry matter production of wild oat and canary grass<br />

Dry matter (g m −2 )<br />

Wild oat Canary grass<br />

Extract/herbicide Rate ha −1 2006–2007 2007–2008 2006–2007 2007–2008<br />

Control (weedy check) – 0.71 a 11.69 a 8.34 a 6.00 a<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) Each at 18 L+3.6 g a.i. 0.08 d (89) 3.29 c (72) 0.69 cd (92) 2.96 b (51)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+43.75 g a.i 0.24 b (65) 2.27 e (81) 2.13 b (75) 1.86 de (69)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super 7.5-EW) Each at 18 L+93.75 g a.i. 0.08 d (89) 3.94 b (66) 0.80 c (90) 2.36 c (61)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+250 g a.i. 0.25 b (65) 3.32 c (72) 1.20 c (86) 1.43 ef (76)<br />

Mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) Each at 18 L+14.4 g a.i. 0.20 bc (72) 2.30 de (80) 0.26 de (97) 1.19 fg (80)<br />

Metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+175 g a.i. 0.12 cd (83) 1.68 f (86) 0.26 de (97) 0.88 g (85)<br />

Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super 7.5-EW) Each at 18 L+315 g a.i. 0.08 d (88) 2.88 cd (75) 0.00 e (100) 1.17 fg (81)<br />

Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+1000 g a.i. 0.09 d (87) 2.27 e (81) 0.89 c (89) 1.43 ef (76)<br />

Values in parenthesis show % inhibition in dry matter production as compared with control.<br />

Values having a different letter in a column differ significantly according to least significant difference test (LSD) at P < 0.05.<br />

a.i. = active ingredient.<br />

first and second years, respectively. Sorghum+sunflower water<br />

extracts combined with 1/4 th (75% less) of label rates of herbicides<br />

suppressed densityof canarygrass by27–76%during firstyear and<br />

46–72% in the second year. Label rates of herbicides decreased<br />

density of canary grass by 70–100% and 74–85% during the first<br />

and second years, respectively.<br />

Sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th (75% less) of<br />

label rates of herbicides and alone label rates of herbicides significantly<br />

(P < 0.05) inhibited dry matter production of both weeds,<br />

wild oat and canary grass as compared with control (Table 2).<br />

Sorghum+sunflower extracts in combination with 1/4 th of label<br />

rates of herbicides reduced dry matter of wild oat by 65–89%<br />

and 66–81% during the first and second years, respectively. The<br />

label rates of herbicides inhibited wild oat dry matter production<br />

by 72–88% and 75–86% during 2 years of experimentation.<br />

Sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th of label rates<br />

of herbicides controlled canary grass by 86–92% and 51–76%<br />

during the first and second years, respectively. The label rates of<br />

herbicides decreased wild oat dry matter production by 89–100%<br />

during the first year and 76–80% during the second year.<br />

Effect of various treatments on persistence index of wild oat<br />

and canary grass<br />

Weed persistence index was calculated to know the perseverance<br />

of wild oat and canary grass (Table 3). A lower persistence<br />

index indicates higher efficiency of any weed control practice.<br />

Persistence index of wild oat in sorghum+sunflower extracts<br />

combined with 1/4 th of label rates of herbicides was either<br />

lower or statistically at par with respective label rates of<br />

herbicides during both years. Likewise, sorghum+sunflower<br />

extracts combined with 1/4 th of label rates of herbicides gave<br />

either lower or statistically equal canary grass persistence index<br />

with respective label rates of herbicides during both years,<br />

except sorghum+sunflower extract+1/4th phenoxaprop-p-ethyl<br />

during first year. The persistence index was calculated considering<br />

together weed density and dry matter production. The lower<br />

persistence index reflects that water extracts+lower rates of<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1899


1900<br />

www.soci.org MN Mushtaq et al.<br />

Table 3. Effect of sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th rates of herbicides on persistence index of wild oat and canary grass<br />

Weed persistence index<br />

Wild oat Canary grass<br />

Extract/herbicide Rate (ha −1 ) 2006–2007 2007–2008 2006–2007 2007–2008<br />

Sorghum+sunflower.+ mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) Each at 18 L+3.6 g a.i. 0.48 b 1.13 a 0.35 a 0.93 b<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+43.75 g a.i 0.49 b 0.80 b 0.36 a 0.94 b<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super 7.5-EW) Each at 18 L+93.75 g a.i. 0.48 b 1.13 a 0.35 a 0.91 b<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+250 g a.i. 0.47 b 1.16 a 0.37 a 0.87 b<br />

Mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis 3.6-WG) Each at 18 L+14.4 g a.i. 0.47 b 0.96 ab 0.36 a 0.97 b<br />

Metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+175 g a.i. 0.73 a 0.78 b 0.36 a 0.72 b<br />

Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super 7.5-EW) Each at 18 L+315 g a.i. 0.49 b 1.22 a 0.00 b 1.40 a<br />

Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+1000 g a.i. 0.52 b 1.05 ab 0.36 a 1.01 b<br />

Values having a different letter in a column differ significantly according to least significant difference test (LSD) at P < 0.05.<br />

a.i. = active ingredient.<br />

herbicides treatments not only effectively controlled the density<br />

of weeds but also dry matter production of the two weeds. The<br />

lower or statistically equal weed persistence index in water extracts<br />

combined with 1/4 th rates of herbicides indicates efficacy of this<br />

technique compared to full rates of herbicides.<br />

Effect of various treatments on growth and yield of wheat<br />

Data on the number of fertile tillers, number of grains per<br />

spike, thousand grain weight and grain yield of wheat were<br />

recorded to assess the impact of water extracts and herbicides on<br />

growth and yield of wheat. The number of fertile tillers was not<br />

significantly different during 2 years of experimentation (Table 4).<br />

Sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th of label rates<br />

of herbicides produced 47–55 and 53–56 grains per spike during<br />

the first and second years, respectively (Table 4). The label rates of<br />

herbicides gave 47–56 grains during the first year and about 48<br />

grains per spike during the second year. Thousand grain weight<br />

was higher in all treatments as compared with control during<br />

both years (Table 4). Sorghum+sunflower extracts combined<br />

with 1/4 th of label rates of herbicides gave 36.88–44.95 g and<br />

38.15–39.25 g thousand grain weight during the first and second<br />

years, respectively. The label rates of herbicides resulted in<br />

36.55–47.55 g and 37.28–38.14 g thousand grain weight during<br />

the first and second years, respectively.<br />

All treatments produced significantly (P< 0.05) higher<br />

wheat grain yield as compared with control (Table 4).<br />

Sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th of label rates<br />

of herbicides increased wheat grain yield by 23–36% and 31–54%<br />

during the first and second years, respectively. The label rates of<br />

herbicides increased wheat grain yield by 27–41% and 37–50%<br />

during the first and second years, respectively. However, the wheat<br />

grain yield was statistically equal in sorghum+sunflower extracts<br />

combined with 1/4 th of label rates of herbicides with respective<br />

label rates of herbicides.<br />

Effect of various treatments on economicand marginal returns<br />

All treatments produced higher net benefits as compared with<br />

control (Table 5). The treatments containing sorghum+sunflower<br />

water extracts combined with 1/4 th (75%) of label rates<br />

of herbicides gave equal or higher net benefits than their<br />

correspondinglabelratesexceptphenoxaprop-p-ethylandisoproturon.<br />

Sorghum+sunflower extracts each at 18 L ha −1 combined<br />

with 1/4 th (3.4 g a.i. ha −1 ) rate of mesosulfuron+idosulfuron<br />

produced the highest net benefits (40%).The marginal analysis<br />

revealed that sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th<br />

(3.4 g a.i. ha −1 ) rate of mesosulfuron+idosulfuron gave maximum<br />

(4404%) marginal rate of return (MRR) (Table 6). It was followed by<br />

sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th rate (43.75 g<br />

a.i. ha −1 ) of metribuzin with 2175% MRR. All label rates of herbicides<br />

were dominated due to higher total cost that vary and/or<br />

lower net benefits except metribuzin at 175 g a.i. ha −1 (1289%<br />

MRR).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Integrated use of sorghum+sunflower extracts and 1/4 th (75%<br />

less) of label rates of herbicides significantly inhibited density and<br />

dry matter production of wild oat and canary grass (Tables 1 and 2).<br />

The main finding of this study is that sorghum+sunflower extracts<br />

combined with 1/4 th rates of herbicides controlled wild oat by<br />

65–89% and canary grass by 51–92%, which is considered good<br />

under field conditions. Furthermore, the equal persistence index<br />

in water extracts+reduced rates of herbicides and label rates of<br />

herbicides showed that 75% less use of herbicides in combination<br />

with sorghum+sunflower water extracts is as effective as label<br />

rates of herbicides for wild oat and canary grass management in<br />

wheat (Table 3). It indicated that herbicide use can be reduced<br />

by 75% through combined application of sorghum+sunflower<br />

extracts and 1/4 th rates of herbicides. Previously, 50% reduction in<br />

herbicide use was reported using sorghum extracts at 12 L ha −1<br />

for weed control in wheat. 25 In the present study, 75% decrease<br />

in herbicide use may be due to two reasons. Firstly, combined<br />

use of two extracts (sorghum+sunflower) might have increased<br />

their efficacy. A mixture of two compounds may be more effective<br />

because they can replace each other on the basis of their biological<br />

exchange rate and may increase efficacy of each other. 26 Jamil<br />

et al. 7 found that combined use of sorghum+sunflower water<br />

extracts was 52% more effective than sorghum extracts alone,<br />

for weed control in wheat. Secondly, a higher rate (18 L ha −1 )of<br />

sorghum and sunflower extracts was used. The inhibitory effects<br />

of allelochemicals against weeds are concentration dependent. 27<br />

Higher concentration of allelopathic extracts may add more<br />

allelochemicals that resulted in more inhibition of weeds. 12 The<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904


Integrated use of allelopathic extracts reduce herbicide use www.soci.org<br />

Table 4. Effect of sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with 1/4 th rates of herbicides on growth and yield of wheat<br />

Fertile tillers m −2 Number of grains per spike 1000 grain weight (g) Grain yield (Mg ha −1 )<br />

Extract/herbicide Rate (ha −1 ) 2006–2007 2007–2008 2006–2007 2007–2008 2006–2007 2007–2008 2006–2007 2007–2008<br />

Control (weedy check) – 384NS 312NS 42.73e 39.83f 34.72e 27.85c 2.50d 1.45b<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+ Each at 18 L+3.6 g a.i. 370 408 55.20<br />

mesosulfuron+<br />

idosulfuron (Atlantis<br />

3.6-WG)<br />

a 53.20ab 44.95a 39.03ab 3.41ab (36) 2.23a (54)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+ Each at 18 L+43.75 g a.i 401 432 52.05<br />

metribuzin (Sencor<br />

70-WP)<br />

bc 54.97a 41.00b 38.15ab 3.25bc (30) 2.07a (43)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+ Each at 18 L+93.75 g a.i. 382 400 51.63<br />

phenoxaprop-p-ethyl<br />

(Puma Super 7.5-EW)<br />

c 56.23a 38.35bcd 39.25a 3.18bc (27) 1.92a (32)<br />

Sorghum+sunflower+ Each at 18 L+250 g a.i. 395 374 47.10<br />

isoproturon (Partner<br />

50-WP)<br />

d 53.37ab 36.88cde 38.83ab 3.07c (23) 1.90a (31)<br />

Mesosulfuron+<br />

Each at 18 L+14.4 g a.i. 401 402 55.80<br />

idosulfuron (Atlantis<br />

3.6-WG)<br />

a 47.30de 47.53a 37.28b 3.52a (41) 2.18a (50)<br />

Metribuzin (Sencor<br />

Each at 18 L+175 g a.i. 403 427 54.25<br />

70-WP)<br />

ab 48.73cd 46.05a 37.33b 3.41ab (36) 2.05a (41)<br />

Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl Each at 18 L+315 g a.i. 415 396 47.43<br />

(Puma Super 7.5-EW)<br />

d 48.2cd 36.55de 38.13ab 3.07c (23) 2.16a (49)<br />

Isoproturon (Partner Each at 18 L+1000 g a.i. 376 374 50.83<br />

50-WP)<br />

c 47.8de 39.43bc 37.6ab 3.18bc (27) 1.98a (37)<br />

Values in parenthesis show % increase in grain yield as compared with control.<br />

Values having a different letter in a column differ significantly according to least significant difference test (LSD) at P < 0.05.<br />

a.i. = active ingredient; NS = non significant.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1901


1902<br />

Table 5. Economic analysis<br />

Treatments<br />

Parameter A B C D E F G H I Remarks<br />

www.soci.org MN Mushtaq et al.<br />

Grain yield∗ 1.98 2.82 2.66 2.55 2.48 2.85 2.73 2.61 2.58 Mg ha−1 Adjusted yield 1.78 2.54 2.39 2.29 2.24 2.57 2.46 2.35 2.32 Mg ha−1 (10% reduction to<br />

bring at farmers’ level)<br />

Gross income 26 663 38 063 35 876 34 370 33 536 38 494 36 848 35 292 34 844 Wheat price at PKR 15<br />

000 Mg−1 Cost of herbicides 0 360 70 278 175 1440 280 1112 700 Mesosulfuron+<br />

idosufuron (PKR<br />

9982/100 g a.i.),<br />

phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (PKR<br />

1186/100 g a.i.), isoproturon<br />

(PKR 70/100 g a.i.),<br />

metribuzin (PKR 160/100 g<br />

a.i.)<br />

Costofextracts 0 140 140 140 140 0 0 0 0 Expenditureonpreparation<br />

of extracts (PKR 70/18 L)<br />

Sprayer rent 0 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 PKR 65 spray−1 Spray application cost 0 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 PKR 130 man-day−1 (one<br />

man-day ha−1 )<br />

Total cost that vary 0 695 405 613 510 1635 475 1307 895 PKR<br />

Net benefits 26 663 37 368 35 471 33 757 33 026 36 859 36 373 33 985 33 949 PKR ha−1 Increase in net benefits (%) – 40 33 27 24 38 36 27 27 Compared with control<br />

∗ Mean of 2 years.<br />

A = Control (weedy check).<br />

B = Sorghum+sunflower extracts each at 18 L+ mesosulfuron+idosulfuron at 3.6 g a.i. ha−1 .<br />

C = Sorghum+sunflower extracts each at 18 L+ metribuzin at 43.75 g a.i ha−1 .<br />

D = Sorghum+sunflower extracts each at 18 L+ phenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 93.75 g a.i.<br />

E = Sorghum+sunflower extracts each at 18 L+ isoproturon at 250 g a.i.<br />

F = mesosulfuron+idosulfuron at 14.4 g a.i. ha-1;<br />

G = metribuzin at 175g a.i.<br />

H = phenoxaprop-p-ethyl at 315 g a.i.<br />

I = isoproturon at 1000 g a.i.<br />

PKR = Pakistan rupees (1 US dollar = 83 PKR); a.i. = active ingredient.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904


Integrated use of allelopathic extracts reduce herbicide use www.soci.org<br />

Table 6. Marginal analysis<br />

Extract/herbicide Rate (ha −1 )<br />

Total cost that<br />

vary (PKR ha −1 )<br />

Net benefits<br />

(PKR ha −1 ) Marginalcost<br />

Marginal<br />

net benefits<br />

Marginal rate<br />

of return (%)<br />

A Control (weedy check) – 0 26 63 0 0 0<br />

C Sorghum+sunflower<br />

+metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP)<br />

Each at 18 L+43.75 g a.i 405 35 71 405 8808 2175<br />

G Metribuzin (Sencor 70-WP) Each at 18 L+175 g a.i. 475 36 73 70 902 1289<br />

E Sorghum+sunflower<br />

+isoproturon (Partner 50-WP)<br />

Each at 18 L+250 g a.i. 510 33 26 0 0 D∗ D Sorghum+sunflower<br />

+phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma<br />

Super 7.5-EW)<br />

Each at 18 L+93.75 g a.i. 613 33 57 0 0 D<br />

B Sorghum+sunflower<br />

+mesosulfuron+idosulfuron<br />

(Atlantis 3.6-WG)<br />

Each at 18 L+3.6 g a.i. 695 37 68 82 3611 4404<br />

I Isoproturon (Partner 50-WP) Each at 18 L+1000 g a.i. 895 33 49 0 0 D<br />

H Phenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma Super<br />

7.5-EW)<br />

Each at 18 L+315 g a.i. 1307 33 85 0 0 D<br />

F Mesosulfuron+idosulfuron (Atlantis<br />

3.6-WG)<br />

Each at 18 L+14.4 g a.i. 1635 36 59 0 0 D<br />

PKR = Pakistan rupees (1 US dollar=83 PKR);<br />

∗ D=Dominated due to less benefits or higher total cost that vary than the preceding treatment; Mean of 2 years.<br />

weed control by allelopathic extracts+lower rates of herbicide<br />

treatments varied because of different weed suppression by label<br />

rates of respective herbicides.<br />

Growth and yield of wheat was improved in all treatments<br />

as compared with control (Table 4). Sorghum+sunflower extracts<br />

combined with 1/4 th of label rates of herbicides produced wheat<br />

grain yield statistically at par with alone label rates of respective<br />

herbicides during both years of the study. Cheema et al. 25 reported<br />

thatsorghum extracts combined with half (50%)rates of herbicides<br />

gave wheat yield comparable with label rates of herbicides. It<br />

indicates that combined use of sorghum+sunflower extracts at<br />

higher concentration (18 L ha −1 ) had no adverse effects on the<br />

yield of wheat and shifting from label rates of herbicides to<br />

combination of sorghum+sunflower extracts and 75% less rates<br />

of herbicides is viable option for weed management in wheat.<br />

The economic evaluation of any technique is essential for its<br />

adoption at farmers’ level. The economic and marginal analyses<br />

showed that combined use of sorghum+sunflower extracts and<br />

1/4 th of label rates of herbicides is economically viable approach<br />

(Tables 5 and 6). Sorghum+sunflower extracts combined with<br />

1/4 th rate of mesosulfuron+idosulfuron resulted in highest (PKR<br />

37 368, 1 US dollar = 83 PKR) net benefits. The marginal rate of return<br />

(MMR) revealed that out of four sorghum+sunflower extracts<br />

plus 1/4 th rates of herbicides treatments, sorghum+sunflower<br />

plus 1/4 th rates of mesosulfuron+idosulfuron and metribuzin<br />

were economical with 4404% and 2175% MRR, respectively<br />

(Table 6). All label rates of herbicides were uneconomical due to<br />

higher costs that vary and/or lower net benefits except metribuzin<br />

that gave 1289% MMR. It is evident that combined use of<br />

sorghum+sunflower extracts and 1/4 th (75% less) of label rates of<br />

herbicides is not only effective for the control of notorious weeds,<br />

wild oat and canary grass but also cost effective.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Integrated use of sorghum+sunflower extracts and 1/4 th (75%<br />

less) of label rates of herbicides (35 DAS) controlled wild oat<br />

and canary grass comparable to label rates of herbicides. They<br />

produced wheat grain yield statistically equal with label rates<br />

of herbicides and were also economical. Hence, this approach<br />

reduces the herbicide use by 75% without compromising wheat<br />

yield and net benefits that will minimise reliance upon synthetic<br />

herbicides, conserve the environment, improve food quality and<br />

help in sustainable weed management. Sorghum and sunflower<br />

are widely grown crops throughout the world. Their herbage is<br />

easilyavailableandfarmerscanprepareextractsattheirown farms.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors are grateful to the Pakistan Agricultural <strong>Research</strong><br />

Council for providing financial support for this study under the<br />

Agricultural Linkages Programme (ALP).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 GuptaOP, Modern Weed Management, 2nd edn. Agrobios, Jodhpur,<br />

pp. 18–23 (2004).<br />

2 FishelFM, Pesticide Use Trends in the U.S: Global Comparison. Florida<br />

Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural<br />

Sciences, University of Florida (2007).<br />

3 HeapI,The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available:<br />

http://www.weedscience.com [7 October 2009].<br />

4 RonaldE, Hand Book of Chemical Risk Assessment: Health Hazards to<br />

Humans, Plants and Animals, vol. II. Lewis Publishers, Washington<br />

DC (2000).<br />

5 Anderson RL,Managingweeds with a dualistic approach of prevention<br />

and control: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 27:13–18 (2007).<br />

6 Macias FA, Molinillo JM, Varela RM and Galindo JC, Allelopathy – a<br />

natural alternative for weed control. Pest Manage Sci 63:<br />

327–348 (2007).<br />

7 Jamil M, Cheema ZA, Mushtaq MN, Farooq M and Cheema MA,<br />

Alternative control of wild oat and canary grass in wheat fields<br />

by allelopathic plant water extracts. Agron Sustain Dev 29:475–482<br />

(2009).<br />

8 Khaliq A, Aslam Z and Cheema ZA, Efficacy of different weed<br />

management strategies in mungbean (Vigna Radiata L.). Int J Agric<br />

Biol 4:237–239 (2002).<br />

9 Iqbal J, Cheema ZA and Mushtaq MN, Allelopathic crop water extracts<br />

reduced the herbicide dose for weed control in cotton (Gossypium<br />

hirsutum L.). Int J Agric Biol 11:360–366 (2009).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1903


1904<br />

10 Weston LA and Duke SO, Weed and crop allelopathy. Crit Rev Plant Sci<br />

22:367–389 (2003).<br />

11 Netzly DH and Butler LG, Roots of sorghum exude hydrophobic<br />

droplets containing biologically active components. Crop Sci<br />

26:775–780 (1986).<br />

12 Cheema ZA, Mushtaq MN, Farooq M, Hussain A and Din IU, Purple<br />

nutsedge management with allelopathic sorghum. Allelopathy J<br />

23:305–312 (2009).<br />

13 Wilson RE and Rice EL, Allelopathy as expressed by Helianthus annuus<br />

anditsroleinoldfieldsuccession.BullTBotClub 95:432–448 (1968).<br />

14 Macias FA, Varela RM, Torres A, Oliva RM and Molinillo JMG, Bioactive<br />

norsesquiterpenes from Helianthus annuus with potential<br />

allelopathic activity. Phytochemistry 48:631–636 (1998).<br />

15 Macias FA, Torres A, Galindo JLG, Varela RM, Alvarez JA and<br />

Molinillo JMG, Bioactive terpenoids from sunflower leaves cv.<br />

Peredovick. Phytochemistry 61:687–692 (2002).<br />

16 Bell AR and Nalewaja JD, Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley.<br />

Weed Sci 16:505–508 (1968).<br />

17 Malik RK and Singh S,Littleseed canarygrass (Phalarisminor)resistance<br />

to isoproturon in India. Weed Technol 9:419–425 (1995).<br />

18 Hobbs PR, Sayre KD and Monasterio Jio, Increasing Wheat Yields<br />

Sustainably Through Agronomic Means. NRG Paper 98–01, Mexico,<br />

D.F. (1998).<br />

19 Sharif MM, Cheema ZA and Khaliq A, Reducing herbicide dose in<br />

combination with sorghum water extract for weed control in wheat<br />

(Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Agric Biol 7:560–563 (2005).<br />

www.soci.org MN Mushtaq et al.<br />

20 Parveen Z, Identification of allelochemicals in sorghum (Sorghum<br />

bicolor L.) and their effect on germination and seedling growth<br />

of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). MSc dissertation, Department of<br />

Chemistry, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan (2000).<br />

21 Mushtaq MN, Cheema ZA and Khaliq A, Effects of mixture of<br />

allelopathic plant aqueous extracts on Trianthema portulacastrum<br />

L. weed. Allelopathy J 25:205–212 (2010).<br />

22 Ross MA and Lembi CA, Applied Weed Science. Burgess Publishing Co.,<br />

Minnesota, pp. 133–139 (1985).<br />

23 Steel RGD,Torrie JHandDickey D,PrinciplesandProceduresofStatistics:<br />

A Biometrical Approach, 3rd edition. McGraw Hill, New York (1997).<br />

24 CIMMYT, From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An<br />

Economics Training Manual, Mexico, D.F. (1988).<br />

25 Cheema ZA, Jaffer I and Khaliq A, Reducing isoproturon dose in<br />

combination with sorgaab for weed control in wheat. Pak J Weed<br />

Sci Res 9:153–160 (2003).<br />

26 Gerig TM and Blum U, Effects of mixtures of four phenolic acids on leaf<br />

area expansion of cucumber seedlings grown in Portsmouth B1 soil<br />

materials. JChemEcol17:29–39 (1991).<br />

27 Hachinohe M, Sunohara Y and Matsumoto H, Absorption,<br />

translocation and metabolism of L-DOPA in barnyardgrass and<br />

lettuce: their involvement in species-selective phytotoxic action.<br />

Plant Growth Regul 43:237–243 (2004).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1897–1904


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 26 November 2009 Revised: 29 March 2010 Accepted: 29 April 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 14 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4031<br />

Supercritical CO2 oil extraction from Chinese<br />

star anise seed and simultaneous<br />

compositional analysis using HPLC<br />

by fluorescence detection and online<br />

atmospheric CI-MS identification<br />

Guoliang Li, a,b Zhiwei Sun, a,b Lian Xia, a,b Junyou Shi, a,b Yongjun Liu, a<br />

Yourui Suo a and Jinmao You a∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Supercritical CO2 was utilised to extract Chinese star anise seed oil (CSASO), and a three-level Box–Behnken<br />

factorial design from response surface methodology was applied to optimise the extraction conditions, including pressure,<br />

temperature and amount of modifier (ethanol). The compositional analysis of fatty acids in CSASO was performed by HPLC with<br />

fluorescence detection using 2-(11H-benzo[a]carbazol-11-yl)-ethyl-4-methylbenzenesulfonate (BCETS) as labelling reagent.<br />

Identification was carried out by online atmospheric chemical ionisation–mass spectrometry.<br />

RESULTS: The optimum extraction conditions were as follows: extraction pressure, 27.72 MPa, extraction temperature, 46.22 ◦ C,<br />

and amount of modifier, 8.58 vol.%. The experimental result showed that the maximum extraction yield was 25.31 ± 0.22%<br />

(w/w) under the conditions proposed. The compositional analysis indicated that CSASO mainly contained C18: 2, C18 : 1, C18 : 3,<br />

C20 : 4, C16, C18 and C20 fatty acids.<br />

CONCLUSION: In this study, a fast, simple and high-efficiency supercritical technique for extracting oil from Chinese star anise<br />

seed was developed. Simultaneous determination of fatty acids in CSASO using BCETS as the labelling reagent with HPLC<br />

fluorescence detection and online mass spectroscopy identification has been successfully achieved.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: Chinese star anise seed oil; supercritical CO2 fluid extraction; response surface methodology; fatty acids; HPLC/APCI/MS<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Chinese star anise (Illicium verum Hook. f.), the seed pod of an<br />

evergreen tree grown in eastern Asia, has a pungent, licoricelike<br />

flavour. It is used as a spice in cooking and for treatment<br />

of dyspeptic complaints and catarrhs of the respiratory tract<br />

in traditional Chinese medicine. 1,2 However, in the last year,<br />

intoxications after consumption of Chinese star anise have been<br />

reported due to adulterations of I. verum with the morphologically<br />

similar Japanese star anise (I. anisatum L.) containing anisatin<br />

and other related toxic sesquiterpene lactones. 2,3 Most previous<br />

studies were focused on the essential oils in the fruit peel of<br />

Chinese star anise, 1,4,5 but there is little study on the Chinese star<br />

anise seed oil (CSASO).<br />

The most valuable part in Chinese star anise is the essential<br />

oil, which have a wide range of commercial applications in the<br />

production of perfumes, cosmetics, soaps, food and beverage<br />

flavourings. 6 The seeds are a by-product of the process, and<br />

account for 20.4% of the total fruit. It has an estimated annual<br />

production potential of one million metric tons in China. Usually<br />

they are treated as waste disposal.<br />

Supercritical CO2 fluid extraction (SFE) offers numerous<br />

potential advantages over conventional extraction processes,<br />

including the facts that it is non-toxic, non-explosive, environmentally<br />

friendly, cost-effective, has a lower consumption of organic<br />

solvent, is time-saving and has high selectivity. 7 SFE has been<br />

widely used for seed oil extractions. 8–11 However, to the best of<br />

our knowledge, the effect of SFE parameters on the CSASO yield<br />

and the optimum operation conditions for CSASO remain poorly<br />

investigated. For a possible industrial application, the optimisation<br />

and assessment of the extraction process with mathematical<br />

modelling seem to be essential. In classical methods, process parameters<br />

are optimised by conducting experiments concentrating<br />

∗ Correspondenceto:Jinmao You,NorthwestPlateauInstituteofBiology,Chinese<br />

Academy of Sciences, Xining, 810001, P.R. China.<br />

E-mail: jmyou6304@163.com<br />

a Northwest Plateau Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining,<br />

810001, P.R. China<br />

b Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, P.R. China<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1905


1906<br />

on one factor at a time. This method is also troublesome and timeconsuming<br />

as well as ignoring the interaction effect of parameters.<br />

Compared to the classical methods, response surface methodology<br />

(RSM) is more efficient, requires fewer data and provides<br />

interaction effects on the response besides factor effects. It has<br />

also been extensively applied to optimise processing parameters<br />

in the production of food, drugs and other commodities. 12–15<br />

Quantitative determination of the fatty acids composition is<br />

helpful to control the quality of CSASO, which has not been<br />

reported yet. Most fatty acids show neither natural absorption in<br />

the visible or ultra-violet (UV) regions nor fluorescence; thus,<br />

their detection at trace levels using absorptiometry is fairly<br />

difficult. Therefore, derivatisation of these analytes with labelling<br />

reagents has been widely adopted, since high-performance liquid<br />

chromatography (HPLC) with UV or fluorescence detection has<br />

a higher sensitivity. 16–18 In this study, 2-(11H-benzo[a]carbazol-<br />

11-yl) ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate (BCETS), which is a new<br />

fluorescent labelling regent, is utilised to analyse the fatty acids<br />

composition in CSASO.<br />

The aims of the present work were to (1) optimise the SFE<br />

conditions including extraction pressure, extraction temperature,<br />

the added amount of modifier, and study on the interaction<br />

effect of the parameters using RSM; (2) to develop a sensitive<br />

method using BCETS as labelling reagent for the simultaneous<br />

determination of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids; and (3) to<br />

determine and quantify the total fatty acids (TFA) and free fatty<br />

acids (FFA) in CSASO.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Materials<br />

The dried Chinese star anise seeds were purchased in Guangxi<br />

(China), and were ground into powder with a cyclone mill<br />

and passed through a 60 mesh sieve. All fatty acids were<br />

purchased from Sigma Reagent Co. (St Louis, MO, USA). Water<br />

was purified on a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).<br />

2-(11H-benzo[a]carbazol-11-yl) ethyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate<br />

(BCETS) was synthesised in our laboratory (the synthesis of BCETS<br />

is not shown). All other chemicals and solvents used were of<br />

analytical grade.<br />

Cell wall breakage pretreatment and supercritical CO2<br />

extraction of CSASO<br />

Cell breakage pretreatment and extraction measurements were<br />

carried out by a semi-bath flow extraction apparatus (Hua’an<br />

SupercriticalFluidExtractionCorp.,Nantong,China).Theschematic<br />

flow diagram was described in detail in a previous study. 19<br />

The cell wall breakage pretreatment was carried out by the<br />

method described by Xu et al. 20 with minor modifications. The<br />

prepared samples (400 g) were placed into a steel cylinder<br />

equipped with mesh filters on both ends to prevent the particles<br />

being flushed out. The loaded cylinder was then introduced into<br />

the extraction vessel and liquefied CO2 was pumped into the<br />

vessel by a high pressure pump. Extraction pressure, extraction<br />

temperature and CO2 flow rate were controlled by adjusting<br />

the valves on the front panel. The pressure and temperature<br />

were controlled to an accuracy of 45 ± 0.5MPaand40± 0.5 ◦ C,<br />

respectively, and kept for 10 min. At the end of each treatment,<br />

the pressure was quickly released to atmospheric pressure within<br />

1min.<br />

The next step was consecutive oil extraction, which was<br />

conducted at the specified extraction conditions (see Table 1).<br />

www.soci.org G Li et al.<br />

Table 1. Experimental and predicted data for the oil yield obtained<br />

from the Box–Behnken design (n = 3)<br />

Run<br />

number<br />

X1,<br />

pressure<br />

(MPa)<br />

Independent variables Oil recovery (%, w/w)<br />

X2,<br />

temperature<br />

( ◦ C)<br />

X3,<br />

modifier<br />

(vol.%)<br />

Experimental<br />

Predicted<br />

1 22.5(0) 40.0 (0) 7.5 (0) 22.11 22.02<br />

2 22.5(0) 40.0 (0) 7.5 (0) 22.60 22.02<br />

3 15.0 (−1) 30.0 (−1) 7.5 (0) 10.80 10.21<br />

4 30.0 (+1) 40.0 (0) 0.0 (−1) 21.90 21.00<br />

5 15.0 (−1) 40.0 (0) 15.0 (+1) 14.70 15.60<br />

6 22.5 (0) 30.0 (−1) 0.0 (−1) 12.10 12.45<br />

7 22.5 (0) 40.0 (0) 7.5 (0) 21.78 22.02<br />

8 30.0 (+1) 40.0 (0) 15.0 (+1) 23.70 23.45<br />

9 15.0 (−1) 50.0 (+1) 7.50 (0) 10.40 9.85<br />

10 22.5 (0) 40.0 (0) 7.50 (0) 21.40 22.02<br />

11 22.5 (0) 40.0 (0) 7.50 (0) 22.20 22.02<br />

12 30.0 (+1) 50.0 (+1) 7.50 (0) 23.72 24.32<br />

13 15.0 (−1) 40.0 (0) 0.00 (−1) 6.80 7.05<br />

14 22.5 (0) 50.0 (+1) 15.0 (+1) 21.50 21.15<br />

15 22.5 (0) 50.0 (+1) 0.00 (−1) 12.60 12.90<br />

16 30.0 (+1) 30.0 (−1) 7.50 (0) 17.00 17.55<br />

17 22.5(0) 30.0 (−1) 15.0 (+1) 15.53 15.20<br />

With some extraction procedures, ethanol, which was used as<br />

modifier, was pumped into the system from the modifier bottle<br />

after the selected pressure and temperature had been achieved.<br />

Each extraction lasted for 90 min, since longer extraction times<br />

did not significantly increase the yield of oil. At the end of the<br />

extraction, supercritical CO2 was depressurised by a flow control<br />

valve to atmospheric pressure, and the oil was collected in a<br />

collection vial. The oil yield was calculated by the weight increased.<br />

Experimental design and statistical analysis<br />

The single-factor experimental design (extracting pressure, extracting<br />

temperature, extracting time and the added amount<br />

of modifier) were carried out before RSM experiments (data not<br />

shown).Threefactors(extractingpressure,extractingtemperature,<br />

and the added amount of modifier) were chosen for further optimisation<br />

by employing a three-level, three-variable Box–Behnken<br />

factorial design (BBD) from RSM. 21 The coded and uncoded independent<br />

variables used in the RSM design and their respective<br />

levels were listed in Table 1. A total of 17 experiments were designed<br />

(Table 1). Each experiment was performed in triplicate and<br />

the average oil yield (%, w/w) was taken as the response, Y.Based<br />

on the experimental data, regression analysis was performed and<br />

was fitted into an empirical second-order polynomial model:<br />

Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + β3X3 + β11X1 2 + β22X2 2<br />

+ β33X3 2 + β12X1X2 + β13X1X3 + β23X2X3<br />

where Y represents the response variable, β0 is a constant term,<br />

β1, β2 and β3, are linear coefficients, β11, β22 and β33 are quadratic<br />

coefficients, β12, β13 and β23 are interaction coefficients.<br />

A software Design-Expert 7.1.3 Trial (State-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis,<br />

MN, USA) was used to obtain the coefficients of the quadratic<br />

polynomial model. The quality of the fitted model was expressed<br />

by the determined coefficient (R 2 ), and its statistical significance<br />

was checked by an F test.<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913


Analysis of Chinese star anise by oil extraction www.soci.org<br />

Figure 1. Derivatisation and identification of fatty acids. (A) Derivatisation scheme of fatty acids with BCETS; (B) the MS/MS cleavage mode of a<br />

BCETS–fatty acid derivative; (C) typical LC/MS profile of the C18 acid derivative (BCETS-C18) from full scanning range from 100 to 600 amu with APCI in<br />

positive-ion detection mode and typical APCI-MS/MS profile of C18 acid derivative (BCETS-C18) from full scanning range from 100 to 600 amu with APCI<br />

in positive-ion detection mode.<br />

Fatty acids analysis<br />

Instrumentation<br />

Experiments were performed with an LC-MSD-Trap-SL liquid<br />

chromatograph mass spectrometer (1100 Series LC-MSD Trap,<br />

a complete LC-MS-MS instrument; Waldbronn, Germany). All the<br />

HPLC system devices were from the HP 1100 series (Waldbronn,<br />

Germany) and consisted of a vacuum degasser (model G1322A),<br />

a quaternary pump (model G1311A), an autosampler (model<br />

G1329A), a thermostatic column compartment (model G1316A),<br />

a fluorescence detector (FLD; model G1321A), and a diode array<br />

detector (DAD; model G1315A). The mass spectrometer, from<br />

Bruker Daltonik (Bremen, Germany), was equipped with an APCI<br />

ion-source. The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.2 µmnylon<br />

membrane filter (Alltech, Deerfield, IL, USA).<br />

Saponification of seed oil<br />

To a 10 mL test tube, 0.1 g seed oil and 2.0 mL potassium<br />

hydroxide/methanol solution (2 mol L −1 ) were added. After being<br />

sealed, the test tube was immersed in a water bath at 90 ◦ Cfor2h.<br />

After cooling, the contents were transferred to a centrifugal test<br />

tube, to which 2 mL water was added, and the pH was adjusted<br />

to 7.0 with 2 mol L −1 hydrochloric acid solution. This solution was<br />

extracted with chloroform three times (3 mL × 3). The combined<br />

chloroformwasfilteredandevaporatedunderastreamofnitrogen.<br />

The residue was re-dissolved in 50 mL N, N-dimethylformamide<br />

(DMF), filtered through a 0.2 mm nylon membrane filter, and<br />

stored at −10 ◦ C until HPLC analysis.<br />

Pre-column derivatisation of fatty acids<br />

To a 1 mL vial, 50 µLBCETS,10mgK2CO3, 100 µL fatty acid mixture<br />

and 200 µL DMF was successively added. The vial was sealed and<br />

allowed to react in a water bath at 90 ◦ C with shaking in 5 min<br />

intervals for 30 min. After the reaction was completed, the mixture<br />

was cooled to room temperature. The derivatisation procedure is<br />

showninFig.1A.<br />

Separation fatty acid derivatives with HPLC<br />

HPLC separation of BCETS–fatty acid derivatives was carried out<br />

on a reversed-phase Eclipse XDB-C8 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm,<br />

5 µm; Agilent, Agilent Technologies, USA) with a gradient elution.<br />

Eluent A was water, B was a mixed solvent of acetonitrile (ACN)<br />

and DMF (1 : 1.v/v), and C was acetonitrile (100%). The flow rate<br />

was constant at 1.0 mL min −1 and the column temperature was<br />

set at 30 ◦ C. The injection volume was 10 µL. The fluorescence<br />

excitation and emission wavelengths were set at λex 279 nm and<br />

λem 380 nm, respectively. The gradient elution program was as<br />

follows: initial = 45% A, 50% B; 30 min = 10% A, 80% B; 40 min =<br />

3% A, 87% B; 50 min = 2% A, 88% B; 70 min = 0% A, 85% B.<br />

Quantitative analysis<br />

Quantitative conversion of fatty acids from CSASO to their BCETS<br />

derivatives was ensured by using an excess of BCETS. All fatty<br />

acids were quantified using the external standard method. The<br />

calibration curves for each fatty-acid derivative were obtained<br />

by linear regression plotting peak area versus concentration (see<br />

Table 2).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Model fitting and statistical analysis<br />

The conditions for supercritical CO2 oil extraction from Chinese<br />

star anise seed were optimised using different parameters by the<br />

combinations of the Box–Behnken design (3 3 factorial). Table 1<br />

shows the experimental and predicted oil yields. The regression<br />

coefficients of the intercept, linear, quadratic and interaction terms<br />

of the model were calculated using the least square technique,<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1907


1908<br />

Table 2. Linear regression equations, correlation coefficients, detection limits, and repeatability<br />

Fatty acid<br />

Regression<br />

equation<br />

Correlation<br />

coefficient<br />

www.soci.org G Li et al.<br />

Detection<br />

limit (fmol)<br />

Retention time<br />

(RSD%, n = 6)<br />

Peak area<br />

(RSD%, n = 6)<br />

C5 Y = 1.70X + 2.10 0.9994 20.71 0.21 0.47<br />

C6 Y = 1.18X − 1.07 0.9997 23.67 0.18 0.70<br />

C7 Y = 1.21X + 5.32 0.9994 17.07 0.13 0.59<br />

C8 Y = 1.05X + 7.02 0.9999 32.06 0.10 0.58<br />

C9 Y = 0.84X + 5.16 0.9997 20.25 0.09 0.49<br />

C10 Y = 0.90X + 4.23 0.9995 19.76 0.07 0.40<br />

C11 Y = 0.89X − 1.93 0.9994 20.25 0.08 0.50<br />

C12 Y = 0.93X + 0.38 0.9998 18.92 0.06 0.47<br />

C20 : 5 Y = 1.19X + 2.90 0.9996 16.32 0.06 0.38<br />

C13 Y = 0.60X + 3.47 0.9994 34.19 0.06 0.22<br />

C18 : 3 Y = 1.23X + 3.60 0.9996 15.65 0.06 0.25<br />

C22 : 6 Y = 1.09X + 4.20 0.9998 16.19 0.06 0.30<br />

C14 Y = 0.74X + 4.49 0.9994 20.79 0.04 0.27<br />

C20 : 4 Y = 1.08X + 2.65 0.9999 15.18 0.07 0.33<br />

C18 : 2 Y = 1.42X − 5.38 0.9996 14.26 0.04 0.27<br />

C15 Y = 0.87X − 1.81 0.9994 12.06 0.04 0.19<br />

C16 Y = 1.26X − 3.36 0.9994 10.79 0.04 0.11<br />

C18 : 1 Y = 1.94X − 3.47 0.9994 12.32 0.03 0.14<br />

C17 Y = 0.86X − 3.63 0.9998 12.06 0.03 0.19<br />

C18 Y = 0.92X − 2.24 0.9999 12.06 0.02 0.18<br />

C20 : 1 Y = 1.14X − 2.76 0.9995 15.34 0.04 0.20<br />

C19 Y = 0.82X − 4.19 0.9996 10.79 0.02 0.19<br />

C20 Y = 0.74X + 0.01 0.9997 14.65 0.05 0.40<br />

C22 : 1 Y = 0.76X − 1.56 0.9998 18.74 0.09 0.52<br />

C21 Y = 0.97X − 2.09 0.9999 15.78 0.07 0.88<br />

C22 Y = 0.67X − 2.45 0.9997 16.34 0.10 1.25<br />

C24 : 1 Y = 0.54X + 0.87 0.9996 20.48 0.18 1.14<br />

C23 Y = 1.03X − 5.89 0.9994 28.05 0.12 1.38<br />

C24 Y = 1.01X − 2.48 0.9999 24.75 0.19 1.92<br />

C25 Y = 1.08X − 11.64 0.9996 25.62 0.24 2.30<br />

C26 Y = 0.91X − 4.33 0.9997 26.79 0.23 2.96<br />

Y is the peak area, and X is the amount injected (pmol).<br />

and are presented in Table 3. The independent and dependent<br />

variables were analysed to obtain a regression equation that<br />

could predict the response within the given range. The predicted<br />

second-order polynomial model was:<br />

Y = 22.02 + 5.45X1 + 1.62X2 + 2.75X3 − 2.59X1 2 − 3.94X2 2<br />

− 2.65X3 2 + 1.78X1X2 − 1.53X1X3 + 1.38X2X3.<br />

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results<br />

of BBD is shown in Table 3. Obviously, all of the linear parameters,<br />

interaction parameters and quadratic parameters were found to be<br />

significant at the level of P < 0.05 or P < 0.01. In this experiment,<br />

the value of R 2 (0.9912) revealed that the experimental data was<br />

in good agreement with the predicted values of the oil yield. The<br />

value of adj-R 2 (0.9800) suggested that the total variation of 98%<br />

for the yield of seed oil was attributed to the independent variables<br />

and only about 2% of the total variation could not be explained<br />

by the model.<br />

The lack of fit was an indication of the failure for a model, if<br />

there is a significant lack of fit which could be indicated by a<br />

low probability value, the response predictor is discarded. 22 The F<br />

value for the lack of fit was insignificant (P > 0.05), meaning that<br />

this model was sufficiently accurate for predicting the relevant<br />

responses. The coefficient of variation (CV%) of less than 4.42%<br />

indicated that the model was reproducible. 23<br />

Response surface analysis and optimisation of SFE conditions<br />

The three-dimensional (3D) response surface and 2D contour<br />

plots can provide a method to visualise the relationship between<br />

responses and experimental levels of each variable and the type<br />

of interactions between two test variables. Figure 2A shows the<br />

effect of the extraction pressure and temperature on the oil yield<br />

at a fixed modifier amount of 7.50 vol.%. With a definite extraction<br />

temperature, pressure had a positive linear effect on the oil yield,<br />

the oil yield increased significantly with the increasing extraction<br />

pressure (Fig. 2A), most likely due to the increase of solvent density<br />

resulting in the improvement of oil solubility. 24 However, the<br />

extraction temperature showed the different results compared to<br />

extraction pressure. Oil yields increased with increasing extraction<br />

temperature and reached a maximum value, followed by a decline<br />

with its further increase (Fig. 2A). That was probably due to the<br />

fact that the density of CO2 decreased at further high temperature.<br />

The temperature showed a negative quadratic effect, while the<br />

complex interaction between temperature and pressure had a<br />

positive effect on the oil yield (see Table 3).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913


Analysis of Chinese star anise by oil extraction www.soci.org<br />

(A)<br />

(B)<br />

(C)<br />

Figure 2. The 3D response surface and 2D contour plots of the oil recovery affected by extraction pressure, extraction temperature, and the amount of<br />

modifier.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1909


1910<br />

www.soci.org G Li et al.<br />

Table 3. Estimated regression coefficients for the quadratic polynomial model and ANOVA for the experimental results<br />

Regression<br />

coefficient<br />

Estimated<br />

coefficients Standard error<br />

Degrees of<br />

freedom Sum of squares F value Prob > F<br />

β0 22.02 0.35 1 485.48 88.02


Analysis of Chinese star anise by oil extraction www.soci.org<br />

Figure 3. Comparison of the oil yields of Chinese star anise seed powder with cell wall breakage pretreatment and without (the squares represent seed<br />

powder with pretreatment; and the triangles represent seed powder without pretreatment).<br />

Table 4. MS data of BCETS-fatty acid derivatives and content of fatty acids from CSASO (n = 3)<br />

Fatty<br />

acid<br />

Molecular<br />

weight [M+H] +<br />

Specific<br />

MS/MS data TFA 1 %(µgmL −1 ) a TFA 2 %(µgmL −1 ) a FFA 3 %(µgmL −1 ) a<br />

C9 401 402.3 261.4, 185.4 0.16 (15.13) 0.12 (12.03) 0.31 (1.46)<br />

C10 415 416.3 261.4, 199.5 0.09 (8.66) 0.08 (8.06) 0.05 (0.22)<br />

C18 : 3 521 521.9 261.4, 304.9, 503.9 0.46 (44.15) 0.46 (45.78) 0.34 (1.61)<br />

C20 : 4 547 547.9 261.4, 330.9, 529.9 0.19 (17.80) 0.17 (16.52) 0.00 (0.00)<br />

C18 : 2 523 523.9 261.4, 306.7, 516.0 47.15 (4518.20) 45.10 (4473.24) 46.94 (223.45)<br />

C16 499 500.2 261.4, 283.5 20.38 (1953.09) 21.08 (2091.09) 24.99 (118.95)<br />

C18 : 1 525 525.8 261.4, 309.0, 507.7 26.33 (2522.81) 25.77 (2555.61) 22.67 (107.90)<br />

C18 527 528.3 261.4, 311.3 4.81 (461.00) 6.65 (659.55) 4.30 (20.48)<br />

C20 555 556.3 261.4, 339.4 0.44 (42.30) 0.57 (56.67) 0.42 (1.99)<br />

Total SFA – – – 26 (2480.17) 29 (2827.39) 31 (143.10)<br />

Total UFA – – – 74 (7102.97) 71 (7091.15) 69 (332.96)<br />

1 Total fatty acids in CSASO extracted under the optimum conditions without modifier.<br />

2 Total fatty acids in CSASO extracted under the optimum conditions.<br />

3 Free fatty acids in CSASO extracted under the optimum conditions.<br />

a a: mass percent (%, ratio of the mass of a fatty acid with that of all fatty acids), absolute content (µg fatty acid mL −1 oil).<br />

graph was established with the peak area (y axis) versus the fatty<br />

acid concentration (x axis: pmol,), and all of the fatty acids provided<br />

excellent linear responses, with correlation coefficients >0.9994.<br />

For the 1.0 pmol injections, the calculated detection limits (at a<br />

signal-to-noise of 3 : 1) of all of the derivatised fatty acids ranged<br />

from 10.79 to 34.19 fmol.<br />

Analysis of fatty acids in CSASO<br />

The total fatty acids (TFA) and free fatty acids (FFA) from CSASO extractedundertheoptimumconditionsweredeterminedandquantified<br />

by HPLC/APCI/MS. The representative chromatograms of<br />

fatty acid standards and total fatty acids from CSASO are presented<br />

in Fig. 4 (chromatograms of other samples not shown). The result<br />

in Table 4 indicated that the seed oil extracted mainly contained<br />

C16, C18, C18 : 1, C18 : 2, C18 : 3 and C20 : 4 fatty acid. Unsaturated<br />

fatty acids (UFA) accounted for 71% at a concentration order of<br />

C18 : 2 > C18 : 1 > C18 : 3 > C20 : 4. In order to investigate the effect<br />

of modifier on the content of fatty acids, the composition of fatty<br />

acids in CSASO obtained under the optimum conditions without<br />

modifier was determined and the resultis also presented in Table 4.<br />

As is shown in Table 4, SFE without modifier yielded 9583 µgmL −1<br />

of TFA; when ethanol was added as modifier, 9918 µgmL −1 was<br />

obtained. The result indicated that modifier in SFE has great impact<br />

on the content of fatty acids. FFA was also determined and<br />

the composition was basically consistent with the total fatty acids<br />

(Table 4), but the C20 : 4 fatty acid was not detected in FFA.<br />

Inthisstudy,thefattyacidcontentinthesamplewasdetermined<br />

bypre-columnderivatisation(usingBCETSasthelabellingreagent)<br />

using HPLC/APCI/MS by fluorescence detection. This method<br />

provedtobesensitiveandquantitativeforanalysingthefattyacids.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

In this work, the SFE parameters for CSASO were optimised<br />

using BBD from RSM, and under the optimum conditions, the<br />

experimental yield (25.31 ± 0.22%, w/w) was well matched with<br />

the predicted yield (25.00%, w/w). The effect of cell wall breakage<br />

pretreatment by supercritical CO2 rapid depressurisation was<br />

significant, which could greatly reduce the extraction time and<br />

increase the oil yield. Simultaneous determination of fatty acids in<br />

CSASO using BCETS as labelling reagent with HPLC fluorescence<br />

detection and online MS identification has been successfully<br />

achieved. The established method can be applied to the extraction<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1911


1912<br />

www.soci.org G Li et al.<br />

Figure 4. Chromatogram of fatty acids standards derivative (A) and fatty acids derivative in extracted oil (B). Chromatographic conditions: column<br />

temperature at 30 ◦ C; excitation wavelength, λex, 279 nm, emission wavelength, λem, 380 nm; Eclipse XDB-C8 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 µm); flow<br />

rate, 1.0 mL min −1 . Peak labels: C6 (hexanoic acid); C7 (heptoic acid); C8 (octanoic acid); C9 (nonanoic acid); C10 (decoic acid); C11 (undecanoic acid);<br />

C12 (dodecanoic acid); C20 : 5 (5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid); C13 (tridecanoic acid); C18 : 3 (8,11,14-octadecatrienoic acid); C22 : 6 (2,5,8,11,14,17docosahexaenoic<br />

acid); C14 (myristic acid); C20 : 4 (6,9,12,15-arachidonic acid); C18 : 2 (9,12-octadecadienoic acid); C15 (pentadecanoic acid); C16<br />

(hexadecanoic acid);C18: 1 (12-octadecenoic acid); C17 (heptadecanoic acid); C18 (stearic acid); C20 : 1 (11-eicosenoic acid); C19 (nonadecanoic acid);<br />

C20(eicosoic acid); C22 : 1 (12-docosenoic acid); C21 (heneicosanoic acid); C22 (docosanoic acid); C24 : 1 (20-tetracosenoic acid); C23 (tricosanoic acid);<br />

C24 (tetracosanoic acid); C25 (pentacosanoic acid); C26 (hexacosanoic acid).<br />

and determination of fatty acids from various food, drugs, plants<br />

and biochemistry samples.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation<br />

of China (No. 20075016) and supported by the 100 Talents<br />

Programme of The Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 328).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 WangZ, WangL, LiT, ZhouX, DingL, YuY, et al., Rapid analysis of<br />

the essential oils from dried Illicium verum Hook. f. and Zingiber<br />

officinale Rosc. by improved solvent-free microwave extraction<br />

with three types of microwave-absorption medium. Anal Bioanal<br />

Chem 386:1863–1868 (2006).<br />

2 Lederer I, Schulzki G, Gross J and Steffen J, Combination of TLC and<br />

HPLC-MS/MS methods. Approach to a rational quality control of<br />

Chinese star anise. J Agric Food Chem 54:1970–1974 (2006).<br />

3 Ize-LudlowD,RagoneS,BruckI,BernsteinJ,DuchownyMandPenaB,<br />

Neurotoxicities in infants seen with the consumption of star anise<br />

tea. Am Acad Pediatr 114:653–656 (2004).<br />

4 Yan JH, X. Xiao XX, and Huang KL, Component analysis of volatile oil<br />

from Illicium verum Hook. F. J Cent South Univ of Technol 9:173–176<br />

(2002).<br />

5 Tuan DQ and Ilangantileket SG, Liquid CO2 extraction of essential oil<br />

from star anise fruits (Illicium verum H.). J Food Eng 31:47–57 (1997).<br />

6 Al-MasriH,Lainé D, Al-Jourani M, Abu-Taha M and Salem K, Detection<br />

of vapour emissions from star anise seeds and mint leaves using<br />

the CO. Int J Nat Eng Sci 1:105–113 (2007).<br />

7 Gouveia L, Nobre B, Marcelo F, Mrejen S, Cardoso M, Palavra A, et al.,<br />

Functional food oil coloured by pigments extracted from<br />

microalgae with supercritical CO2. Food Chem 101:717–723 (2007).<br />

8 Han X, Cheng L, Zhang R and Bi J, Extraction of safflower seed oil by<br />

supercritical CO2. J Food Eng 92:370–376 (2009).<br />

9 Machmudah S, Sulaswatty A, Sasaki M, Goto M and Hirose T,<br />

Supercritical CO2 extraction of nutmeg oil: Experiments and<br />

modeling. J Supercrit Fluid 39:30–39 (2006).<br />

10 LiuW,FuY,ZuY,TongM,WuN,LiuX,et al., Supercritical carbon<br />

dioxide extraction of seed oil from Opuntia dillenii Haw. and its<br />

antioxidant activity. Food Chem 114:334–339 (2008).<br />

11 WestermanD,SantosR,BosleyJ,Rogers J and Al-Duri B, Extraction of<br />

amaranth seed oil by supercritical carbon dioxide. J Supercrit Fluid<br />

37:38–52 (2006).<br />

12 Liyana-Pathirana C and Shahidi F, Optimization of extraction of<br />

phenolic compounds from wheat using response surface<br />

methodology. Food Chem 93:47–56 (2005).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913


Analysis of Chinese star anise by oil extraction www.soci.org<br />

13 Li K, Lai P, Lu S, Fang Y and Chen H, Optimization of acid hydrolysis<br />

conditions for feruloylated oligosaccharides from rice bran through<br />

response surface methodology. J Agric Food Chem 56:8975–8978<br />

(2008).<br />

14 Lafronza L, McAlpine A, Keane A and Astley R, Response surface<br />

method optimization of uniform and axially segmented duct<br />

acoustics liners. JAircraft43:1089–1102 (2006).<br />

15 Desai K, Akolkar S, Badhe Y, Tambe S and Lele S, Optimization<br />

of fermentation media for exopolysaccharide production<br />

from Lactobacillus plantarum using artificial intelligence-based<br />

techniques. Process Biochem 41:1842–1848 (2006).<br />

16 You JM, Zhu F, Zhao WC, Zhao XE and Suo YR, Analysis of saturated<br />

free fatty acids from pollen by HPLC with fluorescence detection.<br />

Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 109:225–236 (2007).<br />

17 You JM, Shi YW, Zhao XE, Zhang H, Suo YR, Li YL, et al., Enhancement<br />

of atmospheric pressure chemical ionization for the determination<br />

of free and glycine-conjugated bile acids in human serum. JSepSci<br />

29:2837–2846 (2006).<br />

18 You JM, Zhao XE, Suo YR, Li YL and Wang HL, Determination of<br />

long-chain fatty acids in bryophyte plant extracts by HPLC with<br />

fluorescence detection and identification with MS. J Chromatogr B<br />

848:283–291 (2007).<br />

19 Koga Y, Iwai Y, Hata Y, Yamamoto M and Arai Y, Influence of cosolvent<br />

on solubilities of fatty acids and higher alcohols in supercritical<br />

carbon dioxide. Fluid Phase Equilib 125:115–128 (1996).<br />

20 Xu X, Sun L, Dong J and Zhang H, Breaking the cells of rape bee<br />

pollen and consecutive extraction of functional oil with supercritical<br />

carbon dioxide. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 10:42–46 (2009).<br />

21 Box G and Wilson K, On the experimental attainment of optimum<br />

conditions. J R Statist Soc 8:1–45 (1951).<br />

22 Montgomery D, Design and Analysis of Experiments, Wiley, Chichester,<br />

pp. 427–500 (2001).<br />

23 Daniel W, Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences,<br />

Wiley, Chichester, pp. 591–598 (1991).<br />

24 Abbasi H, Rezaei K and Rashidi L, Extraction of essential oils from the<br />

seeds of pomegranate using organic solvents and supercritical CO2.<br />

JAmOilChemSoc85:83–89 (2008).<br />

25 Koga Y, Iwai Y, Hata Y, Yamamoto M and Arai Y, Influence of cosolvent<br />

on solubilities of fatty acids and higher alcohols in supercritical<br />

carbon dioxide. Fluid Phase Equilibr 125:115–128 (1996).<br />

26 Sánchez-Vicente Y, Cabañas A, Renuncio J and Pando C, Supercritical<br />

fluid extraction of peach (Prunus persica) seed oil using carbon<br />

dioxide and ethanol. J Supercrit Fluid 49:167–173 (2009).<br />

27 Salgn U, Extraction of jojoba seed oil using supercritical CO2+ethanol<br />

mixture in green and high-tech separation process. J Supercrit Fluid<br />

39:330–337 (2007).<br />

28 Cocero M and Calvo L, Supercritical fluid extraction of sunflower seed<br />

oil with CO2−ethanol mixtures. JAmOilChemSoc73:1573–1578<br />

(1996).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1905–1913 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1913


1914<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 14 January 2010 Revised: 15 April 2010 Accepted: 7 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 10 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4032<br />

Response of nitrogen metabolism in lettuce<br />

plants subjected to different doses and forms<br />

of selenium<br />

Juan J Rios, ∗ Begoña Blasco, Miguel A Rosales, Eva Sanchez-Rodriguez,<br />

Rocio Leyva, Luis M Cervilla, Luis Romero and Juan M Ruiz<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Currently, biofortification programmes are being carried out with selenium (Se), since it is an essential element<br />

for humans and its ingestion depends partly on a vegetable diet, this not being so for plants. In this sense, few studies have<br />

tested the effect that Se has on some of the main plant metabolisms, such as nitrogen (N) metabolism. Thus the aim of this study<br />

was to establish the effect of the application of different doses (5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 120 µmol L −1 ) and forms (selenate and<br />

selenite) of Se on the reduction of nitrate (NO − 3<br />

) and subsequent assimilation of ammonium (NH+<br />

4 ).<br />

RESULTS: The results showed an increase in all enzyme activities analysed (nitrate reductase (NR), nitrite reductase (NiR),<br />

glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT)), especially with application of the selenite form, in addition to a<br />

decline in foliar NO − 3 concentration.<br />

CONCLUSION: Se applied in both forms increased N metabolism, with selenite inducing this physiological process more strongly,<br />

since it prompted a stronger activation of NR, GS and GOGAT as well as a greater concentration of total reduced N.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: Lactuca sativa L.; nitrate; nitrogen assimilation enzymes; selenium<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Selenium (Se) has been deemed essential to animal nutrition since<br />

1957. It is a component of the enzymes glutathione peroxidase,<br />

selenoprotein P and tetraiodothyroine 5 ′ -deiodinase. 1,2 In this<br />

sense, Se is important in mammalian nutrition, since Se deficiency<br />

may promote cancer. 3 Also, Se has low bioavailability in most<br />

crop soils, 4,5 especially in China, the UK, Eastern Europe and<br />

Australia. 6 The concentration of this element is minimal in plant<br />

foods, leading to dietary Se deficiency in humans. 7 Therefore,<br />

given this low bioavailability and the fact that plants are the main<br />

dietary source of this element, different studies have appeared in<br />

recent years concerning ways to increase the Se content in plants<br />

consumed by humans. 5,8,9<br />

Biofortification has been defined as the process of increasing the<br />

bioavailable concentration of essential elements in edible portions<br />

of plants through agricultural intervention or genetic selection. 10<br />

Current reports on wheat varieties, radish and lettuce show that<br />

fertilisation with Se raises the concentration of this trace element<br />

in plants, and they also analyse the contribution of this increase<br />

to daily Se ingestion in humans. 5,9,11 Although diverse studies<br />

have shown a directly proportional relationship between the Se<br />

increase in the culture medium and the rise in foliar concentration<br />

of Se, this relationship is more significant with application in the<br />

form of selenate. 5,9<br />

However, none of these studies has thoroughly analysed the<br />

possible effects of Se application on nutrients essential for plant<br />

growth and development, such as nitrogen (N). This nutrient is<br />

necessary for plants, between 2 and 5% dry weight being required<br />

for optimal development and growth. 12 On the other hand, nitrate<br />

(NO − 3 ) is the main form of N taken up by the roots from the soil,13<br />

and, once taken up, this anion is translocated to the leaves, where<br />

it is stored in the vacuoles and/or transformed into assimilation<br />

products such as amino acids and proteins required for biomass<br />

formation. 14 Also, an excess of foliar NO − 3 can compromise crop<br />

quality, since this anion represents risks for human health, 15<br />

because after ingestion it is rapidly transformed into nitrites and<br />

nitrogenous compounds, which are toxic and can cause serious<br />

pathological disorders such as methaemoglobinaemia and blue<br />

baby syndrome and increase the risk of cancer. 16,17<br />

There are few reports on the influence of Se application on<br />

N metabolism. Aslam et al. 18 reported a decline in the uptake<br />

and reduction of NO − 3 in barley plants after Se application as<br />

either selenate or selenite. Munshi et al., 19 by applying selenite to<br />

potato tubers, found an increase in the content of amino acids<br />

and proteins in the plant organs. More recent studies by Nowak<br />

et al. 20,21 have demonstrated that Se influences, to a greater or<br />

lesser degree, the enzymes nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Juan J Rios, Departamento de Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad<br />

de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain.<br />

E-mail: jjrios@ugr.es<br />

Department of Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Granada,<br />

E-18071 Granada, Spain<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1914–1919 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Response of nitrogen metabolism to selenium in lettuce www.soci.org<br />

reductase (NiR), diminishing their activity and therefore negatively<br />

affecting N metabolism in general. In those reports a decline in<br />

provoked by Se application implies a lower activity of the<br />

NO − 3<br />

enzymes of the glutamine synthetase (GS)/glutamate synthase<br />

(GOGAT) cycle and consequently a decline in the quantity of endproducts<br />

such as amino acids and proteins, thus depressing plant<br />

growth.<br />

In short, the present study seeks to analyse the way in which<br />

Se, under different forms and application rates, influences the<br />

reduction of NO − 3 , the assimilation of ammonium (NH+ 4 )andthe<br />

concentration of various nitrogenous organic compounds.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Plant material and growing conditions<br />

Seeds of Lactuca sativa L. cv. Philipus were germinated (∼250)<br />

and grown for 35 days in perlite-filled cell flats (cell size 3 cm<br />

× 3cm × 10 cm) placed on benches in an experimental<br />

greenhouse (Saliplant SL, Motril, Granada, Spain). The 35-dayold<br />

seedlings were transferred to a cultivation chamber under<br />

controlled environmental conditions with a relative humidity of<br />

60–80%, a day/night temperature of 25/15 ◦ C and a 12/12 h<br />

photoperiod at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of<br />

350 µmol m −2 s −1 , measured at the top of the plants with a 190<br />

SB quantum sensor (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The plants<br />

were grown in individual pots (25 cm upper diameter, 17 cm lower<br />

diameter, 25 cm height, 8 L volume) filled with vermiculite. Until<br />

the end of the experiment the plants received a growth solution<br />

composed of 4 mmol L −1 Ca(NO3)2, 6 mmol L −1 KNO3, 2 mmol L −1<br />

MgSO4 · 7H2O, 1 mmol L −1 NaH2PO4 · 2H2O, 50 µmol L −1 H3BO3,<br />

2 µmol L −1 MnCl2 · 4H2O, 1 µmol L −1 ZnSO4 · 7H2O, 0.1 µmol L −1<br />

Na2MoO4 · 2H2O, 0.25 µmol L −1 CuSO4 · 5H2O and10µmol L −1<br />

iron ethylenediamine-N,N ′ -bis(2-hydroxyphenylacetic acid) (Fe-<br />

EDDHA). The nutrient solution (pH 5.5–6) was renewed every<br />

3 days and the vermiculite partly rinsed with Millipore-filtered<br />

water in order to avoid nutrient accumulation.<br />

At 45 days after germination the different treatments (Se doses<br />

and forms) were applied together with the nutrient solution<br />

described above and maintained for 21 days. The treatments<br />

consisted of the application of Se at rates of 5, 10, 20, 40, 60,<br />

80 and 120 µmol L −1 as Na2SeO4 or Na2SeO3. The different Se<br />

application rates were chosen to cover a broad range, from<br />

the recommended rate for biofortification programmes to rates<br />

causing phytotoxicity. 9 In addition to these treatments, a control<br />

treatment consisted of applying the complete growth solution<br />

without Se supplementation. The experimental design was a<br />

randomised complete block with 15 treatments, arranged in<br />

individualpotswithsixplantspertreatment,andthreereplications.<br />

The experiment was repeated three times under the same<br />

conditions (n = 27).<br />

Plant sampling<br />

Lettuce leaves were sampled on day 66 after sowing. Leaf samples<br />

were standardised by using only fully expanded leaves from the<br />

middle part of plants in each replicate, as these reflect most clearly,<br />

from the nutritional and metabolic standpoint, the effect of the<br />

treatment applied. 9 The material was rinsed three times in distilled<br />

water after disinfection with 10 mL L −1 non-ionic detergent and<br />

then blotted on filter paper. At each sampling, fresh matter was<br />

used for the analysis of enzyme (NR, NiR, GOGAT and GS) activities.<br />

The rest of the plant material (edible leaves) was lyophilised and<br />

used to determine the biomass and the NO − 3 ,NH+ 4<br />

reduced N concentrations.<br />

and total<br />

Analysis of nitrogen forms<br />

The total reduced N concentration was analysed after digestion<br />

of 0.15 g of dry and milled leaf material with sulfuric acid (5 mL<br />

at 980 mL L −1 ) and hydrogen peroxide (300 mL L −1 ). To measure<br />

organic N, after digestion and dilution with deionised water, an<br />

aliquot of 1 mL was added to a reaction medium containing buffer<br />

(50 mL L −1 potassium sodium tartrate, 100 mmol L −1 sodium<br />

phosphate and 54 g L −1 sodium hydroxide), 150 g L −1 sodium<br />

salicylate/0.3 g L −1 sodium nitroprusside and 53.5 mL L −1 sodium<br />

hypochlorite. Samples were incubated at 37 ◦ Cfor15min,and<br />

organic N was measured by spectrophotometry. 22<br />

NO − 3 and NH+ 4 were analysed from an aqueous extract of 0.2 g of<br />

dried and ground leaf material in 10 mL of Millipore-filtered water.<br />

determination and added to<br />

A 100 µL aliquot was taken for NO − 3<br />

100 g L−1 salicylic acid in sulfuric acid at 960 mL L−1 ,andtheNO − 3<br />

concentration was measured by spectrophotometry according to<br />

Cataldo et al. 23 NH + 4 was determined using the method described<br />

by Krom. 24<br />

Enzyme extractions and assays<br />

Leaves were ground in a mortar at 0 ◦ C in 50 mmol L −1 KH2PO4<br />

buffer(pH7.5)containing2mmolL −1 ethylenediamine tetraacetic<br />

acid (EDTA), 15 g L −1 soluble casein, 2 mmol L −1 dithiothreitol<br />

(DTT) and 10 g L −1 insoluble polyvinylpolypyrrolidone. The homogenate<br />

was filtered and then centrifuged at 30 000 × g for<br />

20 min. The resulting extract (cytosol and organelle fractions) was<br />

used to measure enzyme activities. The extraction medium was<br />

optimised for the enzyme activities so that they could be extracted<br />

jointly according to the same method. 25–28<br />

The NR (EC 1.6.6.1) assay followed the methodology of Kaiser<br />

and Lewis. 27 In a final volume of 2 mL the reaction mixture<br />

contained 100 mmol L −1 KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5), 100 mmol L −1<br />

KNO3, 10 mmol L −1 cysteine, 2 mmol L −1 nicotinamide adenine<br />

dinucleotide (NADH) and enzyme extract. Incubation was carried<br />

out at 30 ◦ C for 30 min and stopped by the addition of<br />

1molL −1 zinc acetate. The nitrite formed was determined<br />

colorimetrically at 540 nm after coupling with sulfanilamide<br />

and naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride according to the<br />

method of Hageman and Hucklesby. 29<br />

NiR (EC 1.7.7.1) activity was determined by the disappearance<br />

of NO − 2 from the reaction medium. 26 The reaction mixture<br />

contained 50 mmol L −1 KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5), 20 mmol L −1<br />

KNO2, 5 mmol L −1 methyl viologen, 300 mmol L −1 NaHCO3 and<br />

0.2 mL of enzyme extract. Following incubation at 30 ◦ Cfor30min,<br />

the nitrite content was determined colorimetrically as above. 29<br />

GS (EC 6.3.1.2) activity was determined by the hydroxamate<br />

synthetase assay adapted from Kaiser and Lewis. 27<br />

The reaction mixture was composed of 100 mmol L −1 KH2PO4<br />

buffer (pH 7.5), 4 mmol L −1 EDTA, 1 mol L −1 L-sodium glutamate,<br />

450 mmol L −1 MgSO4 ·7H2O, 300 mmol L −1 hydroxylamine,<br />

100 mmol L −1 adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and enzyme extract.<br />

Two controls were prepared, one without glutamine and the<br />

other without hydroxylamine. Following incubation at 28 ◦ Cfor<br />

30 min, the formation of glutamylhydroxamate was determined<br />

colorimetrically at 540 nm after complexing with acidified ferric<br />

chloride. 30<br />

GOGAT (EC 1.4.1.14) activity was assayed spectrophotometrically<br />

at 30 ◦ C by monitoring the oxidation of NADH at 340 nm,<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1914–1919 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1915


1916<br />

g DW/ shoot<br />

3<br />

2.5<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Selenite LSD 0.05 0.21 Selenate LSD 0.05 0.12<br />

0 5 10 20 40 60 80 120<br />

µmol L-1 Figure 1. Shoot biomass in lettuce plants subjected to different forms and<br />

doses of Se. Bars represent mean ± standard error (n = 27).<br />

essentially as indicated by Groat and Vance 25 and Singh and<br />

Srivastava, 28 always within 2 h of extraction. The reaction mixture<br />

consisted of 50 mmol L −1 KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.5), 1 mL L −1 mercaptoethanol,<br />

1 mmol L −1 EDTA, 18.75 mmol L −1 2-oxoglutarate,<br />

75 mmol L −1 L-glutamine and enzyme extract. Two controls, one<br />

without ketoglutarate and the other without glutamine, were<br />

used to correct for endogenous NADH oxidation. The decrease in<br />

absorbance (linear for at least 10 min) was recorded for 5 min.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)<br />

at 95% confidence using Statgraphics 6.1 (Statistical Graphics<br />

Corporation, Warrenton, USA). Two-way ANOVA was applied to<br />

ascertain whether the Se doses and forms applied significantly<br />

affected the results, and means were compared by Fisher’s least<br />

significant difference (LSD) test. The significance levels for both<br />

analyses were expressed as follows: ∗ P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01;<br />

∗∗∗ P < 0.001; NS, not significant.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Shoot biomass showed significant differences depending on the<br />

form and rate of Se application, higher shoot yield generally<br />

occurring when selenate was applied rather than selenite<br />

(P < 0.001) (Fig. 1). The highest values of shoot biomass were<br />

registered at 20 µmol L−1 for selenate and 5 µmol L−1 for selenite.<br />

These concentrations resulted in greater plant growth than in<br />

the control. On the other hand, it should be highlighted that<br />

the application of selenate at a dose of 80 µmol L−1 or higher<br />

reduced the shoot biomass compared with control plants, while<br />

this biomass reduction was triggered at a dose of only 10 µmol L−1 for selenite. For both forms of Se the minimum production of shoot<br />

biomass was found after the application of 120 µmol L−1 .<br />

Foliar NO − 3 concentration declined as the Se application rate<br />

increased, the drop being more drastic for selenite (Fig. 2). The<br />

lowest NO − 3<br />

concentration was found with the highest Se rate<br />

applied for both forms, while the highest concentration was<br />

found in control plants (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the NO − 3<br />

concentration was higher when the Se form applied was selenate<br />

(P < 0.001). NR activity was also influenced by application of this<br />

trace element. Both Se forms elevated NR activity, with significant<br />

differences between different rates and forms applied (Table 1).<br />

When selenite was applied, the highest NR activity was registered<br />

in the 20 µmol L −1 treatment, while in the case of selenate the<br />

highest NR activity appeared in the 10 µmol L −1 treatment. It<br />

www.soci.org JJ Rios et al.<br />

mg NO 3 - kg -1 FW<br />

5000<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Selenite LSD 0.05 125 Selenate LSD 0.05 138<br />

0 5 10 20 40 60 80 120<br />

µmol L -1<br />

Figure 2. Concentration of NO − 3 in lettuce plants subjected to different<br />

forms and doses of Se. Bars represent mean ± standard error (n = 27).<br />

is noteworthy that in both cases, from these rates upwards, Se<br />

application diminished NR activity. NR activity was higher on<br />

applying selenite with respect to selenate. With regard to NiR<br />

activity, Se had no effect irrespective of its rate and form (Table 1).<br />

Foliar NH + 4 concentration showed no significant differences<br />

either between the different forms of Se used or between<br />

application rates (P > 0.05) (Fig. 3). In terms of the enzymes<br />

involved in NH + 4<br />

assimilation, GS activity increased as the Se rate<br />

rose, with the highest value being registered at 120 µmol L −1 for<br />

both Se forms, while selenite prompted the greatest boost in<br />

GS activity (Table 2). In addition, GOGAT activity also proved to<br />

be affected by this trace element, increasing with increasing Se<br />

application rate (Table 2). Again, GOGAT activity was highest with<br />

the application of selenite in this experiment.<br />

With regard to total reduced N, the data reflected significant<br />

differences between the various Se application rates (P < 0.001)<br />

but not between the two forms applied (P > 0.05) (Fig. 4).<br />

The highest total reduced N concentration was registered at<br />

60 µmol L −1 for selenite and 80 µmol L −1 for selenate, the<br />

assimilated quantity in all cases being higher than in control<br />

plants.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

In plants, stress depresses growth and development, provoking<br />

mainly the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which<br />

damage numerous macromolecules and the cell structure.<br />

Consequently, under adverse conditions, biomass is one of the<br />

main parameters used to determine the stress undergone by<br />

plants. 31,32 In general, the results indicate that selenate was less<br />

toxic than selenite, since the plants tolerated selenate up to a level<br />

of 60 µmol L −1 , while this effect for selenite occurred only up to a<br />

level of 10 µmol L −1 (Fig. 1). Our data agree with those of Cartes<br />

et al., 8 who reported higher phytotoxicity of Se in selenite form<br />

with respect to selenate form. The phytotoxicity of selenite in our<br />

work did not appear to be due to excessive foliar accumulation of<br />

Se, since all selenate treatments led to higher Se concentrations<br />

in the lettuce leaves than did selenite treatment. 9 However, Rios<br />

et al. 33 investigated the influence of Se on oxidative metabolism,<br />

finding that the selenite form led to a greater concentration of<br />

hydrogen peroxide and lower activity of antioxidant enzymes, this<br />

explaining the greater phytotoxicity and therefore, according to<br />

our results, lower biomass production (Fig. 1).<br />

The main form of N taken up by plants from the soil via the roots<br />

isNO − 3 ,13 and,oncetranslocatedtotheleaves,thisanionisstoredin<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1914–1919


Response of nitrogen metabolism to selenium in lettuce www.soci.org<br />

Table 1. Enzymatic activities of nitrate reductase (NR) and nitrite reductase (NiR) in lettuce plants subjected to different forms and doses of Se<br />

NR activity NiR activity<br />

Dose (µmol L −1 ) Selenite Selenate Selenite Selenate<br />

0 0.036 ± 0.01 0.036 ± 0.01 19.48 ± 1.35 19.48 ± 1.35<br />

5 0.089 ± 0.03 0.096 ± 0.05 19.51 ± 1.42 19.51 ± 1.08<br />

10 0.075 ± 0.03 0.104 ± 0.06 19.50 ± 1.27 19.52 ± 1.18<br />

20 0.110 ± 0.04 0.078 ± 0.04 19.57 ± 1.30 19.55 ± 1.37<br />

40 0.070 ± 0.02 0.054 ± 0.03 19.53 ± 1.92 19.53 ± 1.18<br />

60 0.097 ± 0.03 0.067 ± 0.04 19.52 ± 1.60 19.51 ± 1.25<br />

80 0.098 ± 0.04 0.051 ± 0.03 19.52 ± 1.27 19.50 ± 1.23<br />

120 0.083 ± 0.04 0.042 ± 0.02 19.51 ± 1.60 19.83 ± 1.30<br />

P value ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ NS NS<br />

LSD 0.02 0.02 2.12 2.63<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Form of Se (F) ∗∗∗ NS<br />

Dose of Se (D) ∗∗∗ NS<br />

F × D ∗∗∗ NS<br />

LSD 0.01 2.15<br />

NR activity expressed as µmol NO − 2 formed g−1 FW min −1 . NiR activity expressed as µmol NO − 2 reduced g−1 FW min −1 . Levels of significance:<br />

∗∗∗ P < 0.001; NS, not significant. Values represent mean ± standard error (n = 27).<br />

mg NH 4 + g -1 DW<br />

2<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

Selenite LSD 0.05 0.15<br />

Selenate LSD 0.05 0.13<br />

0 5 10 20 40 60 80 120<br />

µmol L-1 Figure 3. Concentration of NH + 4 in lettuce plants subjected to different<br />

forms and doses of Se. Bars represent mean ± standard error (n = 27).<br />

the vacuoles and/or transformed into assimilation products such<br />

as amino acids and proteins required for biomass formation. 14<br />

In addition, excess NO − 3 in the leaves reduces crop quality,<br />

because, after ingestion, NO − 3 is transformed into nitrites and<br />

nitrogenous compounds, which are toxic and can trigger a series<br />

of pathological disorders. 15–17 Furthermore, it should be taken<br />

into account that lettuce is a hyperaccumulator of NO − 3 ,34 and in<br />

this sense the European Commission has imposed a maximum<br />

limit on the concentration of this anion in lettuce plants for human<br />

consumption of 4500 mg NO − 3 kg−1 fresh weight (FW). As a result,<br />

the influence of Se application on the uptake and concentration<br />

of this element in these plants is very important. Thus the data in<br />

Fig. 2 show a decline in NO − 3 concentration after the application of<br />

Se, primarily in the form of selenite, as reported in a previous study<br />

by Aslam et al. 18 in barley plants. The lower foliar concentration of<br />

NO − 3 afterSeapplicationmaybefortworeasons.First,moresharply<br />

in the case of selenite application than of selenate, there may be<br />

a negative effect on the membrane transporters. 33 The reduction<br />

in foliar NO − 3 concentration prompted by selenate could be due<br />

to an antagonistic effect between the two anions. The second<br />

reason could be the induction of NO − 3 assimilation by NR activity<br />

stimulated by the application of both forms of Se.<br />

The first step in NO − 3 assimilation is its reduction to nitrite<br />

(NO − 2 ) by the enzyme NR, the activity of which is regulated<br />

concentration in the leaves. This stage of N<br />

mainly by the NO − 3<br />

assimilation is defined as the most important and limiting step in<br />

this physiological process. 35 In this sense, as reflected in Table 1,<br />

Se application induced NR activity, although this stimulation<br />

was not the same for both Se forms, selenite being superior<br />

to selenate in this respect (Table 1). Our data reflect a reduction in<br />

NR activity at the highest application rates of Se, as observed in<br />

other studies, where high selenite and/or selenate concentrations<br />

have been applied to different plants such as barley, 18 wheat20 and sunflower. 36 Those studies indicate an inhibition of NR when<br />

high concentrations were applied. Also, later studies hold that<br />

selenite, when applied at low concentrations (similar to those in<br />

our work), induces NR. 21 In short, these results indicate a possible<br />

induction by Se, mainly in the form of selenite, with respect to NR<br />

when the application rates are not high.<br />

The second step in NO − 3 assimilation is the reduction of NO−2 to NH + 4 by the enzyme NiR.35 Despite it being considered a<br />

constitutive enzyme, 13 other research indicates a toxic effect on<br />

NiR caused by Se applied at high concentrations, showing a<br />

decline in its activity. 18,36 However, our results do not reflect a<br />

lowering of NiR activity at higher concentrations of applied Se<br />

(Table 1). In short, according to our results, the decline in the foliar<br />

concentration of NO − 3 could be explained in part by the NR activity<br />

induced by application of the different rates and forms of Se.<br />

The reduction of NO − 3 produces NH+ 4 , which is subsequently<br />

incorporated into organic forms. 37 Our results with respect to foliar<br />

NH + 4 concentration suggest that there is a constant flow between<br />

the formation and the removal of this cation, as the data do<br />

not indicate significant differences in foliar concentrations (Fig. 3).<br />

Also, NH + 4 is transformed into organic nitrogenous compounds by<br />

the GS/GOGAT enzymatic cycle. 35,37 Thefirstenzymeinthiscycle,<br />

GS, controls the association of NH + 4 with a glutamate molecule,<br />

forming a molecule of glutamine. 13 This glutamine can either be<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1914–1919 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1917


1918<br />

www.soci.org JJ Rios et al.<br />

Table 2. Enzymatic activities of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) in lettuce plants subjected to different forms and doses<br />

of Se<br />

GS activity GOGAT activity<br />

Dose (µmol L −1 ) Selenite Selenate Selenite Selenate<br />

0 1.16 ± 0.11 1.16 ± 0.11 11.58 ± 0.92 11.58 ± 0.86<br />

5 1.24 ± 0.13 1.24 ± 0.12 13.71 ± 0.95 11.21 ± 0.82<br />

10 1.41 ± 0.13 1.29 ± 0.11 12.87 ± 1.01 13.04 ± 0.95<br />

20 1.75 ± 0.16 1.44 ± 0.14 12.81 ± 0.87 11.43 ± 0.90<br />

40 1.85 ± 0.17 1.74 ± 0.17 12.89 ± 0.96 12.50 ± 0.92<br />

60 1.46 ± 0.17 1.69 ± 0.16 13.22 ± 0.90 12.36 ± 0.92<br />

80 1.85 ± 0.21 1.51 ± 0.16 15.55 ± 1.12 13.02 ± 0.95<br />

120 2.37 ± 0.25 1.79 ± 0.18 14.97 ± 1.07 12.52 ± 0.91<br />

P value ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗<br />

LSD 0.18 0.16 0.83 0.69<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Form of Se (F) ∗∗ ∗∗∗<br />

Dose of Se (D) ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗<br />

F × D ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗<br />

LSD 0.14 0.45<br />

GS activity expressed as µmol γ -glutamylhydroxamate formed g −1 FW min −1 . GOGAT activity expressed as µmol NADH oxidised g −1 FW min −1 .<br />

Levels of significance:<br />

∗∗ P < 0.01; ∗∗∗ P < 0.001; NS, not significant. Values represent mean ± standard error (n = 27).<br />

exported from the cell or used in the formation of other amino<br />

acids and proteins, or else serve as a substrate for α-ketoglutarate,<br />

forming two glutamates. 37,38<br />

Previously, Ruiz et al. 36 reported that the application of Se in<br />

the form of selenate diminished the activities of GS and GOGAT<br />

in sunflower plants. In the present work we find an induction of<br />

the activity of both enzymes with Se application. The difference<br />

between the data reported by Ruiz et al. 36 andthosefoundinthe<br />

present work may be due to the application rate used, since Ruiz<br />

et al. used higher rates. Also, they worked with sunflower plants,<br />

which may be more sensitive than lettuce. These results, together<br />

with the induction of NR activity, imply that there was an increase<br />

in the requirements of nitrogenous compounds on the part of<br />

the plant when this trace element was applied. In fact, it could<br />

be explained by the increase in sulfur (S) metabolism caused in<br />

these plants when Se is applied, mainly in the form of selenite. 39<br />

The increase in S assimilation under these conditions would have<br />

repercussions on the need for nitrogenous organic compounds<br />

by the plant, 40 which would explain the induction of the enzymes<br />

of N assimilation in our work.<br />

Finally, the result of N assimilation can be noted by analysing<br />

the concentrations of amino acids, proteins and total reduced N.<br />

Both amino acids and proteins 39 as well as total reduced N (Fig. 4)<br />

showed an increase with the application of both forms of Se,<br />

confirming the effect of Se in inducing N metabolism in our work.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Se applied in both forms increased N metabolism, selenite being<br />

the form that more strongly induced this physiological process,<br />

since it prompted greater activation of the enzymes NR, GS and<br />

GOGAT as well as a greater concentration of total reduced N.<br />

These results could be explained by the coordination between N<br />

and S metabolisms. Thus the application of Se, especially selenite,<br />

induces the assimilation of S and Se, 39 stimulating the metabolism<br />

mg total reduced<br />

N g-1 DW<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Selenite LSD 0.05 0.88<br />

Selenate LSD0 0.05 0.70<br />

0 5 10 20 40 60 80 120<br />

µmol L-1 Figure 4. Concentration of total reduced N in shoots of lettuce plants<br />

subjected to different forms and doses of Se. Bars represent mean ±<br />

standard error (n = 27).<br />

of N with the aim of maintaining the proper equilibrium between<br />

nitrogenous organic compounds and sulfates.<br />

Finally, the application of selenite, by inducing a greater<br />

incorporation of Se, causes greater phytotoxicity than does<br />

selenate, a result that would explain the biomass reduction despite<br />

the increase in N assimilation.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This work was supported by PAI (Plan Andaluz de Investigación,<br />

AGR-161).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Papp LV, Lu J, Holmgren A and Khanna KK, From selenium to<br />

selenoproteins: synthesis, identity, and their role in human health.<br />

Antiox Redox Signal 9:775–806 (2007).<br />

2 Messaoudi I, El Heni J, Hammouda F, Said K and Kerkeni A, Protective<br />

effects of selenium, zinc or their combination on cadmium induced<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1914–1919


Response of nitrogen metabolism to selenium in lettuce www.soci.org<br />

oxidative stress in rat kidney. Biol Trace Elem Res 130:152–161<br />

(2009).<br />

3 Diwadkar-Navsariwala V, Prins GS, Swanson SM, Birch LA, Ray VH,<br />

Hedayat S, et al, Selenoprotein deficiency accelerates prostate<br />

carcinogenesis in a transgenic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA<br />

103:8179–8184 (2006).<br />

4 Pedrero Z, Madrid Y and Camara C, Selenium species bioaccessibility<br />

in enriched radish (Raphanus sativus): a potential dietary source of<br />

selenium. J Agric Food Chem 54:2412–2417 (2006).<br />

5 Smokolji P, Pograje L, Hlaston-Ribic C and Stibilj V, Selenium content<br />

in selected Slovenian foodstuffs and estimated daily intakes of<br />

selenium. Food Chem 90:691–697 (2005).<br />

6 Lyons G, Ortiz-Monasterio I, Stangoulis J and Graham R, Selenium<br />

concentration in wheat grain. Is there sufficient genotypic variation<br />

to use in breeding? Plant Soil 269:369–380 (2005).<br />

7 Hartikainen H, Xue T and Piironen V, Selenium as an antioxidant and<br />

pro-oxidant in ryegrass. Plant Soil 225:193–200 (2000).<br />

8 Cartes P, Gianfreda L and Mora LM, Uptake of selenium and its<br />

antioxidant activity in ryegrass when applied as selenate and<br />

selenite form. Plant Soil 256:359–367 (2005).<br />

9 Rios JJ, Rosales MA, Blasco B, Cervilla LM, Romero L and Ruiz JM,<br />

Biofortification of Se and induction of the antioxidant capacity<br />

in lettuce plants. Sci Hort 106:248–255 (2008).<br />

10 White PJ and Broadley MR, Biofortifying crops with essential mineral<br />

elements. Trends Plant Sci 10:586–593 (2005).<br />

11 Chen L, Yang F, Xu J, Yun H, Hu Q, Zhang Y, et al, Determination of<br />

selenium concentration of rice in China and effect of fertilization<br />

of selenite and selenate on Se content of rice. J Agric Food Chem<br />

50:5128–5130 (2002).<br />

12 Miller AJ and Cramer MD, Root nitrogen acquisition and assimilation.<br />

Plant Soil 274:1–36 (2005).<br />

13 Barneix AJ, Physiology and biochemistry of source-regulated protein<br />

accumulation in the wheat grain. J Plant Physiol 164:581–590<br />

(2007).<br />

14 Ruiz JM and Romero L, Cucumber yield and nitrogen metabolism in<br />

response to nitrogen supply. Sci Hort 82:309–316 (1999).<br />

15 Prasad S and Chetty AA, Nitrate-N determination in leafy vegetables:<br />

study of the effects of cooking and freezing. Food Chem<br />

106:772–780 (2008).<br />

16 Mensinga TT, Speijers JGA and Meulenbelt J, Health implications of<br />

exposure to environmental nitrogenous compounds. Toxicol Rev<br />

14:576–584 (2003).<br />

17 Santamaria P, Nitrate in vegetables: toxicity, content, intake and EC<br />

regulation. J Sci Food Agric 86:10–17 (2006).<br />

18 Aslam M, Harbit KB and Huffaker RC, Comparative effects of selenite<br />

and selenate on nitrate assimilation in barley seeding. Plant Cell<br />

Environ 13:773–782 (1990).<br />

19 Munshi CB, Combs GF and Mondy NI, Effect of selenium on the<br />

nitrogenous constituents of the potato. J Agric Food Chem<br />

38:2000–2002 (1990).<br />

20 Nowak J, Kaklewski K and Klódka D, Influence of various concentration<br />

of selenic acid (IV) on the activity of soil enzymes. Sci Total Environ<br />

29:105–110 (2002).<br />

21 Nowak J, Kaklewski K and Ligocki M, Influence of selenium on<br />

oxidoreductive enzymes activity in soil and in plants. Soil Biol<br />

Biochem 36:1553–1558 (2004).<br />

22 Baethgen WE and Alley MM, A manual colorimetric procedure for<br />

measuring ammonium nitrogen in soil and plant. Commun Soil Sci<br />

Plant Anal 20:961–969 (1989).<br />

23 Cataldo DA, Haroon M, Schrader LE and Young VL, Rapid colorimetric<br />

determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid.<br />

Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 6:71–80 (1975).<br />

24 Krom MD, Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia: study<br />

of a modified Berthelot reaction using salicylate and<br />

dichloroisocyanurate. Analyst 105:305–316 (1980).<br />

25 Groat RG and Vance CP, Root nodule enzymes of ammonia<br />

assimilation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiol<br />

67:1198–1203 (1981).<br />

26 Lillo C, Diurnal variations of nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase,<br />

glutamate synthase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate<br />

aminotransferase in barley leaves. Physiol Plant 61:214–218 (1984).<br />

27 Kaiser JJ and Lewis OAH, Nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase<br />

activity in leaves and roots of nitrate fed Helianthus annuus L. Plant<br />

Soil 70:127–130 (1984).<br />

28 Singh RP and Srivastava HS, Increase in glutamate synthase activity in<br />

maize seedlings in response to nitrate and ammonium nitrogen.<br />

Physiol Plant 66:413–416 (1986).<br />

29 Hageman RH and Hucklesby DP, Nitrate reductase. Meth Enzymol<br />

23:497–503 (1971).<br />

30 Wallsgrove RM, Lea PJ and Miflin BJ, Distribution of enzymes of<br />

nitrogen assimilation within the pea leaf cell. Plant Physiol<br />

63:232–236 (1978).<br />

31 Moran JF, Becana M, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frechillas S, Klucas RV and<br />

Aparicio-Tejo P, Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plants.<br />

Planta 194:346–352 (1994).<br />

32 Blasco B, Rios JJ, Cervilla LM, Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Ruiz JM and<br />

Romero L,Iodinebiofortificationandantioxidantcapacityoflettuce:<br />

potential benefits for cultivation and human health. Ann Appl Biol<br />

152:289–299 (2008).<br />

33 Rios JJ, Blasco B, Cervilla LM, Rosales MA, Sanchez-Rodriguez E,<br />

Romero L, et al, Production and detoxification of H2O2 in lettuce<br />

exposed to selenium. Ann Appl Biol 154:107–116 (2009).<br />

34 MAFF, 1997/8 UK monitoring programme of nitrate in lettuce and<br />

spinach. Food Surveillance Information Sheet No. 154, Ministry of<br />

Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London (1998).<br />

35 Ruiz JM, Rivero RM, Garcia PC, Baghour M and Romero L, Role of<br />

CaCl2 in nitrate assimilation in leaves and roots of tobacco plants<br />

(Nicotiana tabacum L.). Plant Sci 141:107–115 (1999).<br />

36 Ruiz JM, Rivero RM and Romero L, Comparative effect of Al, Se and<br />

Mo toxicity on NO3 assimilation in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)<br />

plants. J Environ Manag 83:207–212 (2007).<br />

37 Temple SJ, Vance CP and Grant JS, Glutamate synthase and nitrogen<br />

assimilation. Trends Plant Sci 3:51–56 (1998).<br />

38 Lea PJ and Azevedo RA, Nitrogen use efficiency. 1. Uptake of nitrogen<br />

from the soil. Ann Appl Biol 149:243–247 (2006).<br />

39 Rios JJ, Blasco B, Cervilla LM, Rubio-Wilhelmi MM, Ruiz JM and<br />

Romero L, Regulation of sulphur assimilation in lettuce plants in the<br />

presence of selenium. Plant Growth Regul 56:43–51 (2008).<br />

40 Gerendás J, Sailer M, Fendrich ML, Stahl T, Mersh-Sundermann V and<br />

Mühling KM, Influence of sulfur and nitrogen supply on growth<br />

nutrient status and concentration of benzyl-isothiocyanate in cress<br />

(Lepidium sativum L.). J Sci Food Agric 88:2576–2580 (2008).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1914–1919 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1919


1920<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 13 October 2009 Revised: 4 May 2010 Accepted: 9 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 14 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4033<br />

A thermostable lectin from the rhizomes<br />

of Kaempferia parviflora<br />

Wichchulada Konkumnerd, a Aphichart Karnchanatat b<br />

and Polkit Sangvanich c∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: Kaempferia parviflora, or black galingale (Kra-Chai-Dam), belongs to the Zingiberaceae family and is used as<br />

both a food ingredient and a medicinal plant. There are diverse reports on the biological activities of compounds extracted<br />

from the plant, such as antimalarial, antifungal and an effective sexual-enhancing role, but not on the lectins.<br />

RESULTS: A lectin was isolated from the rhizomes of Kaempferia parviflora using affinity chromatography on Concanavalin A<br />

followed by gel filtration chromatography on Sephacryl S-100. The molecular weight of the purified lectin was about 41.7 kDa.<br />

This lectin showed haemagglutinating activity against erythrocytes from several sources, with the highest level being against<br />

those from rabbits. Moreover, the lectin was thermostable, with significant haemagglutinating activity detectable up to 75 ◦ C.<br />

The results of trypsin digestion and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry analysis suggested that this protein<br />

could be a member of the lectin/endochitnase1 family.<br />

CONCLUSION: A lectin that showed thermotolerant haemagglutinating activity against erythrocytes from several sources<br />

was successfully purified from K. paviflora rhizomes. Peptide sequence analysis indicated that this lectin is similar to<br />

lectin/endochitinase 1 (Urtica dioica) or Hevein-like protein (Hevea brasiliensis).<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: Kaempferia parviflora; thermostable; lectin; LC/MS/MS<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Lectins are polyvalent sugar-binding proteins or glycoproteins<br />

of non-immune origin that have an apparently ubiquitous<br />

distribution in nature, show a specificityfor terminal or subterminal<br />

carbohydrate residues and can agglutinate cells and/or precipitate<br />

glycoconjugates. 1 The main characteristic of this class of proteins is<br />

their abilityto interactwith carbohydrates and so combine with the<br />

glycocomponents of the cell surface as well as with cytoplasmic<br />

and nuclear structures and the extracellular matrix of cells and<br />

tissues from throughout the five kingdoms. 2 The availability of<br />

a large number of lectins with distinct carbohydrate specificities<br />

has resulted in the use of these proteins as tools in medical and<br />

biological research. 3 Moreover, they have attracted considerable<br />

interest because of their remarkable effects in a wide range of<br />

biological systems, including the purification and characterisation<br />

of glycoconjugates and the study of cell surface architecture. 4<br />

The family Zingiberaceae is a large, important and well-known<br />

monocot family (ginger plants) that is conspicuous throughout the<br />

tropics. It comprises approximately 52 genera and 1400 species,<br />

with the centre of diversity being in South/Southeast Asia. In<br />

Thailand there are 26 genera and more than 300 species of<br />

these plants, 5 many of which are used in food and traditional<br />

medicine. 6 Black galingale (Kaempferia parviflora Wall ex. Baker),<br />

known locally in Thai as Kra-Chai-Dam, is a herbaceous plant within<br />

the Zingiberaceae family, and its black to purple rhizomes have<br />

traditionally been employed in local food as a flavouring agent and<br />

as a folklore medicinal plant for the treatment of a wide spectrum<br />

of illnesses. Indeed, since ancient times it has traditionally been<br />

used as a health-promoting and vitalising agent. 7 For example,<br />

its rhizomes or their ethanolic extracts are applied as a general<br />

health-promoting agent, as an anti-inflammatory agent and for<br />

the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. 7,8 Their purported<br />

therapeutic activities have attracted a great deal of interest<br />

in recent years. A preliminary study on K. parviflora plantlets<br />

revealed the presence of haemagglutinating activity against rabbit<br />

erythrocytes in rhizome extracts. 9 In this paper we report the<br />

purification and physicochemical characterisation of a lectin from<br />

K. parviflora rhizomes as a prerequisite to any further study of this<br />

lectin with respect to its physiological role in the plant.<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Polkit Sangvanich, <strong>Research</strong> Center for Bioorganic<br />

Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn<br />

University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. E-mail: polkit@gmail.com<br />

a Program of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University,<br />

Bangkok 10330, Thailand<br />

b Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Chulalongkorn University,<br />

Bangkok 10330, Thailand<br />

c <strong>Research</strong> Center for Bioorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of<br />

Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1920–1925 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Thermostable lectin from Kaempferia parviflora www.soci.org<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Biological materials<br />

Fresh rhizomes of K. parviflora were purchased from a local market<br />

in Bangkok, Thailand. A voucher specimen (BK51772) is deposited<br />

at the Bangkok Herbarium of the Plant Variety Protection Division,<br />

Department of Agriculture, Bangkok, Thailand. Human blood<br />

samples (ABO system) were obtained from healthy donors at the<br />

Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand. All other non-human<br />

animal blood was supplied by the Division of Production and<br />

Supply, National Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University,<br />

Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.<br />

Chemicals and reagents<br />

Concanavalin A Sepharose (ConA Sepharose), bovine serum albumen<br />

(BSA) and α-glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were<br />

purchased from Sigma Chemicals Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA).<br />

The Sephacryl S-100 size exclusion column was obtained from<br />

Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden). Methyl-α-Dglucopyranoside<br />

was purchased from Fluka (Steinheim, Germany).<br />

The reagents used in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel<br />

electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) were obtained from Plusone Pharmacia<br />

Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden), except for the low-molecularweight<br />

marker protein calibration kit, which was purchased from<br />

Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Amersham, UK). All other biochemicals<br />

and chemicals used in the investigation were of analytical<br />

grade.<br />

Purification of lectin from rhizomes of K. parviflora<br />

To purify the K. parviflora lectin, fresh rhizomes (1 kg wet weight)<br />

were washed, cut into small pieces and homogenised in a<br />

blender in TBS (20 mmol L −1 Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing<br />

0.15 mol L −1 NaCl) at 1.5 kg L −1 , then left to extract overnight<br />

at 4 ◦ C with stirring. The insoluble material was subsequently<br />

removed by filtration through two layers of cheesecloth, and the<br />

filtrate was clarified by centrifugation at 15 000 × g for 30 min<br />

at 4 ◦ C. To the clear filtrate (the crude TBS-soluble rhizome<br />

extract) was then added ammonium sulfate to 80% saturation,<br />

and the mixture was stirred overnight at 4 ◦ C to precipitate the<br />

proteins. The precipitate, mostly as a suspension, was harvested<br />

by centrifugation at 15 000 × g for 30 min at 4 ◦ C. The supernatant<br />

was discarded and the pelleted proteins were dissolved in TBS and<br />

dialysed against excess water. The dialysate was then adjusted<br />

to ∼2mgmL −1 , and 10 mL aliquots were fractionated by affinity<br />

chromatography on a 1.6 cm × 20 cm ConA Sepharose column<br />

equilibrated and eluted with TBS at a flow rate of 60 mL h −1 .After<br />

elution of the unbound proteins in the equilibrium buffer (i.e.<br />

when the eluate A280 fell to


1922<br />

A 280 (mAU)<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

www.soci.org W Konkumnerd, A Karnchanatat, P Sangvanich<br />

20 mmol L -1 Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)<br />

+ 150 mmol L -1 NaCl<br />

+ 0.5 mol L -1 methyl a-Dglucopyranoside<br />

(A)<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250<br />

Elution volume (mL)<br />

A 280 (mAU)<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50<br />

Elution volume (mL)<br />

Figure 1. (A) Affinity chromatogram of Kaempferia parviflora rhizome lectin on ConA Sepharose. The column was equilibrated and then washed with<br />

TBS. The lectin was then eluted with TBS containing 0.5 mol L −1 methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (arrow indicates addition of methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside)<br />

asdescribedinthetext.(B)ElutionprofileofpurifiedK. parviflora lectin from Sephacryl S-100 gel filtration chromatography column. The elution profiles<br />

shown are representative of at least three independent trials.<br />

Internal amino acid sequence of lectin by liquid<br />

chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)<br />

The amino acid sequence of an internal fragment of the<br />

purified lectin from K. parviflora rhizomes was determined<br />

by in-gel trypsin digestion of the selected SDS-PAGE-resolved<br />

protein band, as reported previously, 14 and sequencing of the<br />

different tryptic peptides by LC/MS/MS. The selected band was<br />

excised from the SDS-PAGE gel and washed with 30 mL L −1<br />

hydrogen peroxide. The protein was in-gel reduced, alkylated<br />

and digested with trypsin. After digestion the peptides were<br />

subjected to two sequential extractions from the gel with<br />

500 mL L −1 acetonitrile/1 g L −1 trifluoroacetic acid at 200 µLg −1<br />

gel (wet weight), the two extracts subsequently being pooled and<br />

air dried. The extracted tryptic peptides were then subjected<br />

to LC/nano-electrospray ionisation (ESI)-MS/MS. All collected<br />

LC/MS/MS data were processed and submitted to a MASCOT<br />

search of an in-house NCBI database. The following criteria were<br />

used in the MASCOT search: trypsin cleavage specificity with<br />

up to three missed cleavage sites, cysteine carbamidomethyl<br />

fixed modification, methionine oxidation variable modifications,<br />

±0.2 Da peptide tolerance and MS/MS tolerance and ESI-TRAP<br />

fragmentation scoring.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Purification of lectin from rhizomes of K. parviflora<br />

The crude TBS-soluble protein extract from the black rhizomes of<br />

K. parviflora was first preciptated with 80% saturation ammonium<br />

sulfate, which reduced the total protein level by 10% and resulted<br />

in a slight (1.04-fold) increase in specific haemagglutinating<br />

activity with a 6% yield loss. Indeed, haemagglutinating activity<br />

(total and specific) was used as a surrogate lectin marker to monitor<br />

all purification procedures. Following dialysis, ConA Sepharose<br />

affinity chromatography was employed. All haemagglutinating activity<br />

remained in the bound fraction, with no detectable activity<br />

in the void elutant. In the presence of the competitor, 0.5 mol L −1<br />

methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, 80% of the haemagglutinating activity<br />

was eluted (Fig. 1(A)), resulting in a further decrease in<br />

the total protein of ∼99% and the effective loss of the purple<br />

pigments, and thus a further 72-fold purification (Table 1). The<br />

recovered bound fraction with haemagglutinating activity was<br />

Table 1. SummaryofpurificationofTBS-soluble Kaempferiaparviflora<br />

rhizome lectin<br />

Purification step<br />

Total<br />

protein<br />

(mg) a<br />

Total<br />

activity<br />

(HU) b<br />

Specific<br />

activity<br />

(HU mg −1 ) c<br />

(B)<br />

Yield<br />

(%)<br />

Purification<br />

(fold) d<br />

Crude extract 1958 25 600 13.1 100 1<br />

80% sat.<br />

(NH4)2SO4<br />

precipitation<br />

1758 24 000 13.7 94 1.04<br />

Con A Sepharose<br />

(bound<br />

fraction)<br />

19.5 19 200 985 75 75.3<br />

Gel filtration<br />

(Sephacryl<br />

S-100)<br />

8.72 10 240 1174 40 89.8<br />

a Crude protein extract from 334 g wet weight of rhizomes.<br />

b Haemagglutinating activity (HU) as the minimal concentration<br />

of protein able to cause visible agglutination of a 20–40 mL L −1<br />

suspension of rabbit erythrocytes.<br />

c Specific activity is defined as the haemagglutination unit (HU) divided<br />

by the protein concentration (mg mL −1 ) of the assay solution. Rabbit<br />

erythrocytes were used for the assay.<br />

d Thepurificationindexwascalculatedastheratiobetweentheminimal<br />

concentration of the crude extract able to cause visible agglutination<br />

of rabbit erythrocytes and that of the protein fraction obtained at each<br />

purification step.<br />

dialysed and concentrated and then resolved by Sephacryl S-100<br />

gel filtration chromatography, giving the protein elution profile<br />

shown in Fig. 1(B). Only one peak of protein eluted from the column,<br />

and this final (potentially homogeneous) lectin preparation<br />

was purified 89.8-fold with a 40% yield relative to the initial crude<br />

extract (Table 1).<br />

The protein from each step of the purification procedure was<br />

analysed for purity by reducing SDS-PAGE (data not shown). After<br />

ConA Sepharose affinity chromatography a single main protein<br />

band on the SDS-PAGE gel was observed (Fig. 2), indicating that<br />

the enriched lectin fraction obtained from the ConA Sepharose<br />

column was a relatively pure lectin protein. Therefore, assuming<br />

both purification to homogeneity and a constant relationship<br />

between haemagglutinating activity and total lectin mass, the<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1920–1925


Thermostable lectin from Kaempferia parviflora www.soci.org<br />

Figure 2. Reducing SDS-PAGE analysis of enriched Kaempferia parviflora<br />

rhizome lectin purification: lane 1, molecular weight standards; lane 2,<br />

35 µg of crude extract (homogenate); lane 3, 50 µg of 80% saturation<br />

ammonium sulfate-precipitated fraction; lane 4, 20 µg of discarded<br />

unbound fraction from ConA Sepharose; lane 5, 15 µg ofretainedConA<br />

Sepharose-bound fraction; lane 6, 10 µg of peak with haemagglutinating<br />

activity obtained from gel filtration on Sephacryl S-100.<br />

total yield of this TBS-soluble K. parviflora rhizome lectin was<br />

26.1 mg kg −1 (wet weight) rhizomes, which is about 0.45% (w/w)<br />

of the total protein in the crude rhizome extract. However, allowing<br />

for purification losses, the lectin itself likely accounts for ∼1.1%<br />

(w/w) of the total rhizome protein.<br />

From the total neutral carbohydrate analysis, this K. parviflora<br />

rhizome lectin was found to contain 14.7% (w/w) sugar, which<br />

is significantly higher than the levels reported previously for the<br />

lectins from the Chinese evergreen chinkapin (5.8%), Helianthus<br />

tuberosus L. tubers (5.3%) and Arundu donex (2.1%). 15–17 It remains<br />

plausible that, during the enrichment procedures prior to and<br />

during ConA Sepharose chromatography, residual endoglycanase<br />

activity, in conjunction with the preferential binding of the natural<br />

glycoprotein-rich lectin isoforms to the ConAresin, would selectfor<br />

purified lectins of a lower carbohydrate content than the real level.<br />

Conversely, we may have enriched for high-carbohydrate isoforms<br />

by the use of the ConA Sepharose affinity chromatography. Note,<br />

however, that against this latter point no haemagglutinating<br />

activity was detected in the void or early elution fractions,<br />

suggesting that any low-carbohydrate isoforms present are either<br />

inactive or relatively rare.<br />

Molecular weight determination<br />

Discontinuous reducing SDS-PAGE revealed a single strong band<br />

for the enriched K. parviflora lectin corresponding to an apparent<br />

molecular weight of 41.7 kDa after Coomassie blue R-250 staining,<br />

although another weaker band was potentially present at ∼39 kDa<br />

(Fig. 2). A single band of the same apparent size was seen<br />

under non-reducing conditions (not shown), suggesting that<br />

the enriched lectin fraction could be a monomeric protein and<br />

capable of haemagglutinating activity alone. The apparent size of<br />

∼41.7 kDa is slightly larger than the previously published sizes of<br />

most other plant lectins, which range from 30 to 35 kDa, 18–20 and is<br />

more in agreement with that of the bacterial lectin from Escherichia<br />

coli. 21 Regardless, this higher apparent molecular weight may<br />

reflect the greater degree of observed glycosylation (see above).<br />

Table 2. Haemagglutinating activity of purified Kaempferia parviflora<br />

rhizome lectin against human and other animal erythrocytes<br />

Blood type Total activity (HU)<br />

Human A 640<br />

Human B 640<br />

Human AB 640<br />

Human O 1280<br />

Rabbit 19 200<br />

Mouse 1200<br />

Rat 4800<br />

Guinea pig 1200<br />

Goose 4800<br />

Sheep 9600<br />

The concentration of K. parviflora lectin used in these assays was<br />

1mgmL −1 and was serially 1 : 1 (v/v) diluted. Data shown are mean ±<br />

standard deviation and are derived from three repeats.<br />

Assay for haemagglutinating activity<br />

Kaempferia parviflora lectin powerfully agglutinated rabbit erythrocytes,<br />

with, in order of haemagglutinating activity, rabbit ≫<br />

sheep > rat = goose > mouse = guinea pig (Table 2). In addition,<br />

it showed a weak but essentially non-specific agglutination<br />

of human erythrocytes, where the A, B and AB groups showed<br />

an equal agglutination activity and group O was only marginally<br />

stronger than the other three human groups, but still weak and<br />

on a par with that seen against mouse and guinea pig erythrocytes.<br />

The low haemagglutinating activity of this lectin towards<br />

mouse and guinea pig erythrocytes is similar to that seen with<br />

the lectins from Pisum sativum and Bauhinia monandra seeds, 22,23<br />

while the high haemagglutinating activity seen with rabbit erythrocytes<br />

is broadly similar to that observed with the lectins from<br />

Hevea brasiliensis and Canavalia cathartica. 24,25 However, the combined<br />

species–activity profile of the lectin from K. parviflora is<br />

somewhat unique. In terms of species specificity only, the lectin<br />

from Trichosanthes anguina exhibited haemagglutinating activity<br />

against all four human group erythrocytes as well as mouse,<br />

rabbit and goat erythrocytes. 26 Examples of lectins with higher<br />

and different species specificities include the seed lectins from<br />

Lonchocarpus capassa and Galactia lindenii, which are specific for<br />

human group O as well as rabbit erythrocytes, 27,28 but the two<br />

differ in activities and the latter also agglutinates rat erythrocytes,<br />

while the mannose/glucose-specific lectin from Chinese evergreen<br />

chinkapin (Castanopsischinensis) seeds exhibited haemagglutinating<br />

activity against mouse and rabbit erythrocytes. 17<br />

Effect of temperature on lectin haemagglutinating activity<br />

and stability<br />

At 70 and 80 ◦ C the haemagglutinating activity of the enriched<br />

K. parviflora rhizome lectin decreased to 40 and 60% respectively<br />

of the corresponding activity at room temperature (Fig. 3(A)),<br />

suggesting different conformational changes of the lectin under<br />

these conditions. This phenomenon, although not the exact<br />

temperature shift values, is quite similar to that seen for the<br />

lectin from Phaseolus vulgaris, 29 which is extremely thermostable<br />

at temperatures around 82 ◦ C, for the lectin from Astragalus<br />

mongholicus, which is still active at 65 ◦ C, 30 and for the lectin<br />

from C. cathartica, which is active at 60 ◦ Cbutnotat70 ◦ C. 25<br />

Contrastingly, examples of thermolabile lectins, with respect<br />

to haemagglutinating activity, include that from Psophocarpus<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1920–1925 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1923


1924<br />

log 2 of Hemagglutination titre<br />

10 (A)<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

www.soci.org W Konkumnerd, A Karnchanatat, P Sangvanich<br />

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Temperature ( ο C)<br />

log 2 of Hemagglutination titre<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200<br />

Pre-incubation time (min)<br />

Figure 3. (A) Effect of temperature on haemagglutinating activity of purified Kaempferia parviflora rhizome lectin towards rabbit erythrocyte suspension<br />

in TBS. (B) Thermostability of same purified lectin towards rabbit erythrocyte suspension in TBS at 60 ◦ C(◦), 70 ◦ C(•), 80 ◦ C(�) and90 ◦ C(�). In both<br />

parts, data are shown as mean ± standard deviation and are derived from three repeats. Full activity (100%) corresponds to a titre of 2 5 .<br />

5 10<br />

15 Accession Number<br />

Kaempferia parviflora lectin G P I Q L S Y N Y N Y G P A G K<br />

Lectin/endochitinase 1 (Urtica dioica) 240 G P I Q L T H N F N Y G L A G Q 255 P11218<br />

Hevein-like protein (Sambucus nigra) 200 G P I Q L T H N F N Y G L A G E 215 Q9ZT61<br />

Figure 4. Amino acid sequence from resolved tryptic fragments of enriched Kaempferia parviflora lectin, in comparison with other members of the lectin<br />

family that showed the highest sequence homology in BLASTp searches of NCBI and SwissProt databases. Shaded regions represent regions of identity.<br />

palustric, whose haemagglutinating activity declined rapidly when<br />

heated above 50 ◦ C, being reduced to 50 and 0% at 60 and 70 ◦ C<br />

respectively. 31 The lectins from the rhizomes of Smilax glabra,<br />

Aspidistra elatior Blume and Arundo donax were very stable at<br />

temperaturesupto50 ◦ Cbutshowedverylittlehaemagglutinating<br />

activity above 80–85 ◦ C and no enhanced activity with increased<br />

temperatures. 16,32 Together,thesedatasupportthenotionthatthe<br />

haemagglutinating activity depends on the native conformation<br />

of the protein. 33 Indeed, the activity of the lectin is related to<br />

cations, just like the metal ions in Concanavalin A, which protect it<br />

from proteolytic and temperature degradation. 34<br />

In terms of haemagglutinating activity, the thermostability<br />

of the purified K. parviflora rhizome lectin varied with both<br />

incubation time and temperature (Fig. 3(B)). Pre-incubation at<br />

70 and 80 ◦ C and to a lesser extent at 90 ◦ C for 30–60min<br />

increased the subsequent haemagglutinating activity, with longer<br />

pre-incubation times leading to a stable higher (70 and 80 ◦ C)<br />

or broadly the same (90 ◦ C) final haemagglutinating activity level<br />

as that seen with no pre-incubation. The markedly lower final<br />

activity seen at 90 ◦ C compared with that seen at the other two<br />

temperatures is presumably due to a lower enhanced activation<br />

level in the early pre-incubation period. In contrast, pre-incubation<br />

at 60 ◦ C rapidly decreased the haemagglutinating activity with<br />

increasing pre-incubation time, until the lectin was fully inactive<br />

after 90 min. The implication here is that the conformational<br />

structure adopted by the lectin at 60 ◦ C is not suitable for<br />

haemagglutination.<br />

The Gibb’s free energy of thermostability at all incubation<br />

temperatures and times was calculated and found to vary<br />

significantly, with both positive and negative values. For example,<br />

the �G values at 60 and 70 ◦ C pre-incubation for 30 min were 58.3<br />

and −60.6calmol −1 respectively. Since �G = �H − T�S, ata<br />

constant temperature �T is zero and �G depends on the �H term.<br />

If �G is positive, energy is absorbed in a non-spontaneous process,<br />

whereas, if �G is negative, energy is evolved in a spontaneous<br />

process. Considering that the high haemagglutinating activity<br />

seen at 70 ◦ C for 20 min corresponds to a �G of 59.8 cal mol −1 ,<br />

the stability of the K. parviflora rhizome lectin is maximal at the<br />

temperature where the entropies of the native and denatured<br />

states are equal. Because many lectins exert antinutritional effects<br />

on mammals, including humans, 35 the free energy of activation of<br />

the lectin denaturation process is an important physicochemical<br />

parameter to determine, especially considering the increasing<br />

applications of lectins in agriculture, medicine and related areas<br />

as well as human and animal nutrition.<br />

Internal amino acid sequence of lectin by LC/MS/MS<br />

The internal amino acid sequence of the purified lectin from<br />

K. parviflora rhizomes was obtained by in-gel digestion with<br />

trypsin and sequence analysis with LC/MS/MS. The main resolved<br />

peptide sequence was GPIQL SYNYN YGPAG K (m/z 1742.91).<br />

Comparisons were then made with all available protein sequences<br />

in the SwissProt database using BLASTp searches. This sequence<br />

is part of the conserved lysozyme-like superfamily domain that is<br />

conserved in a fairly diverse array of proteins, including chitinases.<br />

However, coupled with its haemagglutinating activity, the high<br />

degree of internal amino acid sequence identity between this<br />

peptide sequence and other lectins suggests that this protein<br />

could be a member of the lectin/endochitnase 1 family, 36 as<br />

showninFig.4.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The TBS-soluble lectin extracted from K. paviflora rhizomes was<br />

successfully purified in two steps by affinity chromatography on<br />

ConcanavalinAandgelfiltrationonSephacrylS-100,resultinginan<br />

increase in the specific activity to 1174 HU mg −1 proteinwitha40%<br />

yield. Reducing SDS-PAGE analysis yielded an estimated molecular<br />

weight for this lectin of about 41.7 kDa. The lectin showed nonspecific<br />

weak haemagglutinating activity on human (A, B, AB and<br />

O) erythrocytes as well as stronger activity on non-human (rabbit<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1920–1925<br />

(B)


Thermostable lectin from Kaempferia parviflora www.soci.org<br />

≫ sheep > rat = goose > mouse = guinea pig) erythrocytes. The<br />

optimal temperature for haemagglutinating activitywas 75–85 ◦ C,<br />

suggesting that this K. paviflora lectin is thermally stable.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors thank Chulalongkorn University (graduate school<br />

thesis grant), the Thai Government Stimulus Package 2 (TKK2555),<br />

under the Project for Establishment of Comprehensive Center for<br />

Innovative Food, Health Products and Agrigulture, Ratchadapisek<br />

Somphot Endowment Fund (AG001B) for financial support of<br />

this research, and the Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic<br />

Engineering, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University for<br />

supportandfacilities.WealsothankDr.RobertButcher(Publication<br />

Counselling Unit, Chulalongkorn University) for his constructive<br />

comments in preparing this manuscript.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Goldstein IJ, Hughes RC, Monsigny M, Osawa T and Sharon N, What<br />

should be called a lectin? Nature 285:66 (1980).<br />

2 Brooks SA and Leathem AJ, Expression of N-acetyl galactosaminylated<br />

and sialylated glycans by metastases arising from primary breast<br />

cancer. Invasion and Metastasis 18:115–121 (1998).<br />

3 Singh RS, Tiwary AK and Kennedy JF, Lectins: sources, activities and<br />

applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol 19:145–178 (1999).<br />

4 LisH and SharonN, Biochemistry of Plants: a Comprehensive Treatise.<br />

Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 371–447 (1980).<br />

5 Larsen K and Larsen SS, Gingers of Thailand. Queen Sirikit Botanic<br />

Garden, Chiang Mai, pp. 1–130 (2006).<br />

6 Sirirugsa P, Thai Zingiberaceae: species diversity and their uses. Pure<br />

Appl Chem 70:2111–2118 (1998).<br />

7 Yenjai C, Prasanphen K, Daodee S, Wongpanich V and Kittakoop P,<br />

Bioactive flavonoids from Kaempferia parviflora. Fitoterapia<br />

75:89–92 (2004).<br />

8 Rujjanawate C, Kanjanapothi D, Amornlerdpison D and Pojanagaroon<br />

S,Anti-gastric ulcereffect of Kaempferiaparviflora.JEthnopharmacol<br />

102:120–122 (2005).<br />

9 Sangvanich P, Kaeothip S, Srisomsap C, Thiptara P, Petsom A,<br />

Boonmee A, et al, Hemagglutinating activity of Curcuma plants.<br />

Fitoterapia 78:29–31 (2007).<br />

10 Bradford MM, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation<br />

of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of<br />

protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254 (1976).<br />

11 Dubois M, Giles K, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA and Smith F, Colorimetric<br />

method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal<br />

Chem 28:350–356 (1956).<br />

12 Laemmli UK, Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of<br />

the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685 (1970).<br />

13 Dawes C, Circadian rhythms in human salivary flow rate and<br />

composition. JPhysiol220:529–545 (1972).<br />

14 Mortz E, Vorm O, Mann M and Roepstorff P, Identification of proteins<br />

in polyacrylamide gels by mass spectrometric peptide mapping<br />

combined with database search. Biol Mass Spectrom 23:249–261<br />

(1994).<br />

15 Suseelan KN, Mitra R, Pandey R, Sainis KB and Krishna TG, Purification<br />

and characterization of a lectin from wild sunflower (Helianthus<br />

tuberosus L.) tubers. Arch Biochem Biophys 407:241–247 (2002).<br />

16 Kaur A, Singh J, Kamboj SS, Sexana AK, Pandita RM and<br />

Shamnugavel M, Isolation of an N-acetyl-D-glucosamine specific<br />

lectin from the rhizomes of Arundo donax with antiproliferative<br />

activity. Phytochemistry 66:1933–1940 (2005).<br />

17 Wong JH, Chan HYE and Ng TB, A mannose/glucose-specific lectin<br />

from Chinese evergreen chinkapin (Castanopsis chinensis). Biochim<br />

Biophys Acta 1780:1017–1022 (2008).<br />

18 Franz H, Ziska P and Kindt A, Isolation and properties of three lectins<br />

from mistletoe (Viscum album L.). Biochem J 195:481–484 (1981).<br />

19 Van Damme EJM, Rougé BP, Van Leuven F and Peumans WJ, The<br />

seed lectins of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) are encoded by<br />

two genes which differ from the bark lectin genes. Plant Mol Biol<br />

29:1197–1210 (1995).<br />

20 Kamemura K, Furuichi Y, Umekawa H and Takahashi T, Purification<br />

and characterization of a pod lectin from Great Northern bean.<br />

Phaseolus vulgaris L. Biochim Biophys Acta 1289:87–94 (1996).<br />

21 Basu S, Ghosh S, Ganguly NK and Majumdar S, A biologically active<br />

lectin of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Biochimie 86:657–666<br />

(2004).<br />

22 Coelho LCBB and Silva MBR, Simple method to purify milligram<br />

quantitiesofthegalactose-specificlectinfromtheleavesofBauhinia<br />

monandra. Phytochem Anal 11:295–300 (2000).<br />

23 Sitohy M, Doheim M and Badr H, Isolation and characterization of a<br />

lectin with antifungal activity from Egyptian Pisum sativum seeds.<br />

Food Chem 104:971–979 (2007).<br />

24 Wittsuwannakul R, Wititsuwannakul D and Sakulborirug C, A lectin<br />

from the bark of the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Phytochemistry<br />

47:183–187 (1998).<br />

25 Suseelan KN, Bhagwath A, Pandey R and Gopalakrishna T,<br />

Characterization of Con C,alectin from Canavaliacathartica Thouars<br />

seeds. Food Chem 104:528–535 (2009).<br />

26 Shanavas K, Elyas K and Vasudevan D, Purification and some<br />

properties of a lectin from the seeds of Trichosanthes anguina.<br />

Biol Plant 37:417–422 (1995).<br />

27 Joubert FJ, Sharon N and Merrifield EH, Purification and properties of a<br />

lectin from Lonchocarpus capassa (apple-leaf) seed. Phytochemistry<br />

25:323–327 (1986).<br />

28 Almanza M, Vega N and Perez G, Isolating and characterising a<br />

lectin from Galactia lindenii seeds that recognises blood group<br />

H determinants. Arch Biochem Biophys 429:180–190 (2009).<br />

29 Biswas S and Kayastha AM, Thermal stability of Phaseolus vulgaris<br />

leucoagglutinin: a differential scanning calorimetry study. JBiochem<br />

Mol Biol 35:472–475 (2002).<br />

30 Yan Q, Jiang Z, Yang S, Deng W and Han L, A novel homodimeric lectin<br />

from Astragalus mongholicus with antifungal activity. Arch Biochem<br />

Biophys 422:72–81 (2005).<br />

31 Adenike K,Kayode FAandAkintola A,Purificationandcharacterization<br />

of a lectin from the seeds of Psophocarpus palustris. Pak J Biol Sci<br />

8:1667–1678 (2005).<br />

32 Xu X, Wu C, Liu C, Luo Y, Li J, Zhao X, et al, Purification and<br />

characterization of a mannose-binding lectin from the rhizomes of<br />

Aspidistra elatior Blume with antiproliferative activity. Acta Biochim<br />

Biophys Sin 39:507–519 (2007).<br />

33 Ng TB and Yu YL, Isolation of a novel heterodimeric agglutinin from<br />

rhizomes of Smilax glabra, the Chinese medicinal material tufuling.<br />

Int J Biochem Cell Biol 33:269–277 (2001).<br />

34 Doyle RJ and Keller KF, Lectins in the clinical microbiology laboratory.<br />

Clin Microbiol Newslett 8:157–159 (1986).<br />

35 Vasconcelos IM and Oliveira JTA, Antinutritional properties of plant<br />

lectins. Toxicon 44:385–403 (2004).<br />

36 Lerner DR and Raikhel NV, The gene for stinging nettle lectin (Urtica<br />

dioica agglutinin) encodes both a lectin and a chitinase. JBiolChem<br />

267:11085–11091 (1992).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1920–1925 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1925


1926<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 23 December 2009 Revised: 16 April 2010 Accepted: 12 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 22 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4036<br />

Metabolite profiling of doenjang, fermented<br />

soybean paste, during fermentation<br />

Hye-Jung Namgung, a Hye-Jung Park, a In Hee Cho, a Hyung-Kyoon Choi, b<br />

Dae-Young Kwon, c Soon-Mi Shim a∗ and Young-Suk Kim a∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: A fermented soybean paste known as doenjang is a traditional fermented food that is widely consumed in<br />

Korea. The quality of doenjang varies considerably by its basic ingredients, species of microflora, and fermentation process.<br />

The classification of predefined metabolites (e.g. amino acids, organic acids, sugars and sugar derivatives, and fatty acids) in<br />

doenjang samples according to fermentation was performed by using GC-FID and GC-MS data sets with the application of a<br />

multivariate statistical method.<br />

RESULTS: The predominantly produced amino acids included alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, glutamine,<br />

phenylalanine and lysine, showing remarkable increases in amounts during the later stages of fermentation. Carbonic<br />

acid, citric acid, lactic acid and pyrogultamic acid were identified as the major organic acids. Significant amounts of erythrose,<br />

xylitol, inositol and mannitol were detected during fermentation. Regarding fatty acids, relatively higher amounts of palmitic<br />

acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid and linolenic acid were found in the doenjang at each fermentation time point. Principal<br />

component analysis (PCA) successfully demonstrated changes in composition patterns as well as differences in non-volatile<br />

metabolites according to fermentation period.<br />

CONCLUSION: A set of metabolites could be determined representing the quality of doenjang during fermentation, and which<br />

might also be correlated with taste ingredients, flavour, nutrition, and physiology activities that are claimed to be dependent<br />

on the quality control of commercial doenjang.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: fermented soybean paste; metabolites; GC-MS; PCA; amino acids; organic acids; sugars and sugar derivatives; fatty acids<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The consumption of fermented foods has been gaining popularity<br />

due to their healthful aspects. 1 A fermented soybean paste<br />

known as doenjang is a traditional fermented food that is widely<br />

consumed in Korea, and it has historical worth from a food-culture<br />

point of view. 2 Doenjang has been an important source of protein<br />

and flavouring agents for Koreans, and remains popular even<br />

today. Doenjang is recognised as a nutritious food that provides<br />

essential amino acids that are lacking in cereal protein diets, as<br />

well as fatty acids, organic acids, minerals and vitamins, 3 which are<br />

highly related to its quality and diverse nutritional benefits. The<br />

quality of doenjang varies considerably by its basic ingredients,<br />

species of microflora, and fermentation process. 4,5,6<br />

As a traditional Korean fermented soybean paste, doenjang has<br />

unique qualities in terms of its flavour and taste as compared<br />

to other similar products from Asian countries such as Japan<br />

and China. 7 This is due to the fact that the fermentation process<br />

and natural environment, such as temperature and humidity, are<br />

unique in Korea. 8 Doenjang is traditionally produced through the<br />

fermentation of cooked soybeans (meju), by naturally occurring<br />

bacteria and fungi such as Bacillus subtilis, Rizopus, Mucor and<br />

Aspergillus species. 1,5 More recently, doenjang has been prepared<br />

commercially by local manufactures using a slightly different<br />

procedure. 4 Commercial products are prepared from cultivated<br />

soybeans mixed with cooked rice or barely and partly fermented<br />

with Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus sojae to form koji. 5,7,9<br />

The multivariate analysis approach provides a potential means<br />

for studying global changes in metabolite concentrations that<br />

are related to variations in physiological or pathological status. 10<br />

In particular, metabolite profiling, which aims to quantify several<br />

pre-defined targets, has been used to understand changes in predefined<br />

metabolites of diverse foods and biological systems. 11 One<br />

of the most commonly used analytical approaches for metabolite<br />

profiling is gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) after<br />

derivatisation procedures. 10 It is less expensive compared to<br />

other analytical approaches (e.g. CE-MS, LC-MS and NMR) and<br />

has high reproducibility, high resolution and few matrix effects. 12<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Soon-Mi Shim and Young-Suk Kim, Department of Food<br />

Science and Technology, Ewha Woman’s University, 11-1 Daehyun-dong,<br />

Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, South Korea. E-mail: yskim10@ewha.ac.kr;<br />

soonmishim@gmail.com<br />

a Department of Food ScienceandTechnology,EwhaWoman’s University, 11-1<br />

Daehyun-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-750, South Korea<br />

b College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 156-756, South Korea<br />

c Korea Food<strong>Research</strong> Institute,516Baekhyun-Dong,Bundang-Ku,Sungnam-Si,<br />

Gyeonggi-Do, 463-746, South Korea<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Metabolic profiling of doenjang www.soci.org<br />

Since the datasets obtained by metabolite profiling are generally<br />

large and complex, principal component analysis (PCA), which<br />

is an unsupervised clustering method, is often employed. 13 The<br />

overall goal of PCA is to describe datasets of numerical variables<br />

with smaller sets of new and synthetic variables, called principal<br />

components.<br />

In this study, the profiling of pre-defined metabolites in<br />

doenjang during fermentation was investigated by applying a<br />

multivariate statistical method to GC-MS datasets. This approach<br />

may be a useful tool to elucidate changes in diverse metabolites<br />

suchasaminoacids,organicacids,fattyacids,andsugarsaccording<br />

to the doenjang fermentation process.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Preparation of doenjang<br />

Soybeans (Korean Bactae, Glycine max L.) used in this study<br />

were cultivated in Sunchang, Jeollanamdo, South Korea, in 2005.<br />

The soybeans were immersed in water at 15 ◦ Cfor15hand<br />

then steamed under steam pressure at 1.7 kgf cm −2 for 30 min<br />

using a commercial steamer (Nippon Kikkoman type, Eunkwang<br />

Machinery, Seoul, Korea). The soybeans were mashed and cooled<br />

to 40 ◦ C before being formed into blocks, called meju. An aliquot<br />

of meju was freeze-dried for preparation 0 day of sample. Meju<br />

were then exposed to sunlight for 3 months for drying, as well<br />

as for natural fermentation by microorganisms such as Bacillus<br />

subtillis occurring in the air, by hanging them with a straw. The<br />

meju was next washed by flowing water to remove mould on the<br />

surface, put into large opaque pottery jars containing 26% brine,<br />

and left for 2 months until the salinity dropped to 18%. Samples<br />

of the meju immersed in brine solution were collected at 20-day<br />

intervals during the 160 days of fermentation. The solid parts that<br />

had separated from the liquid were mashed before being used as<br />

specimens.<br />

Analysis of non-volatile metabolites in doenjang<br />

Amino acids<br />

Two grams of specimen were mixed with 10 mL of methanol and<br />

then heated at 70 ◦ C for 25 min. The mixture was subjected to<br />

vortexing for 1 min, followed by additions of 10 mL of distilled<br />

water and 5 mL of chloroform. The final mixture was centrifuged<br />

twice at 1910 × g for 10 min. A 100 µL of norvaline as an internal<br />

standardcompoundwasaddedinto100 µLoftheaqueousfraction<br />

and then derivatised using an EZ : fastTM amino acid analysis kit<br />

(Phenomenex, Inc., Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). A Zebron<br />

column (ZB-AAA, 10 m length × 0.25 mm film thickness i.d.) which<br />

was connected to an HP 6890 series gas chromatograph with<br />

a built-in FID for application (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA,<br />

USA) was used. The temperatures of the injector and detector<br />

were 250 and 320 ◦ C, respectively. The oven temperature was<br />

maintained at 110 ◦ C for 10 min, increased to 320 ◦ Catarate<br />

of 30 ◦ Cmin −1 , and then maintained at 320 ◦ Cfor1min.The<br />

split ratio was 1 : 15 at 250 ◦ C and the injection volume was<br />

2.0 µL. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow<br />

rate of 1.1 mL min −1 . The amino acids in the doenjang were<br />

identified by comparing their retention times to those of standard<br />

derivatives. The amounts of amino acids in the doenjang were<br />

calculated by comparing their peak areas to those of the internal<br />

standard compounds. The quantitative data were the mean values<br />

of triplicate measurements.<br />

Organic acids<br />

Two grams of specimen, 10 mL of methanol, and 1 mL of salicylic<br />

acid [1% (w/v) in methanol] as an internal standard, were<br />

placed in a 60 mL vial prior to heating at 70 ◦ C for 25min.<br />

After cooling at ambient temperature for 30 min, the mixture<br />

was subjected to vortexing for 1 min along with additions<br />

of 10 mL of distilled water and 5 mL of chloroform. It was<br />

then centrifuged twice at 1910 × g for 10 min. The aqueous<br />

fraction was extracted using the method described above and<br />

then condensed to a final volume of 1 mL in a rotary vacuum<br />

evaporator (EYELSA; Rikakai Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The moisture<br />

was completely removed by using a vacuum drying oven (EYELA<br />

NDO-600SD; Rikakikai). Trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivatisation was<br />

performed in order to increase the volatility of the non-volatile<br />

organic acids before GC-MS analysis. Three hundred microlitres of<br />

bis-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA; Supelco, Bellefonte,<br />

PA, USA) containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) and 300 µL<br />

of acetonitrile (Fisher Scientific Ltd., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) were<br />

added into the dehydrated specimen and then heated at 70 ◦ C<br />

for 40 min followed by cooling to ambient temperature. A DB-5<br />

column (30 m length × 0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness;<br />

J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA) attached to an HP 6890 series<br />

gas chromatograph that was connected to an HP 5975A mass<br />

selective detector was employed. The temperatures of injector and<br />

detector transfer line were 200 ◦ C and 250 ◦ C, respectively. The<br />

oven temperature was maintained at 80 ◦ C for 10 min, increased<br />

to 230 ◦ Catarateof3 ◦ Cmin −1 , and then maintained at 230 ◦ C<br />

for 1 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate<br />

of 0.8 mL min −1 , and the mass spectra were obtained at 70 eV<br />

through the electron ionisation (EI) method. The injection volume<br />

was 1.0 µL. The organic acids in the doenjang were identified by<br />

comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those of<br />

authentic standards. The amounts of organic acids in the doenjang<br />

were calculated by comparing their peak areas with those of the<br />

internal standard compounds. The quantitative data were the<br />

mean values of triplicate measurements.<br />

Sugars and sugar derivatives<br />

The same procedure of sample preparation carried out for<br />

determining organic acids was used for sugars and sugar<br />

derivatives. One millilitre of salicylic acid [1% (w/v) in methanol]<br />

wasusedasaninternalstandard.Trimethylsilyl(TMS)derivatisation<br />

was performed in order to increase the volatility of the<br />

sugars and sugar derivatives. Three hundred microlitres of<br />

hexamethyldisilazane, 300 µL of TMCS and 400 µL of pyridine were<br />

added to a completely dehydrated specimen, and then heated<br />

at 85 ◦ C for 50 min. The sample was then cooled at ambient<br />

temperature prior to being analysed by GC-MS.<br />

GC-MS analytical method for quantification and identification of<br />

sugars and sugar derivatives were same as in organic acid analysis.<br />

Fatty acids<br />

The fatty acids in the doenjang were analysed using method<br />

described by Metcalfe et al. 14 Two grams of freeze-dried doenjang<br />

specimen were mixed with 30 mL of chloroform and 15 mL<br />

of methanol, followed by heating for 25 min at 75 ◦ Cusinga<br />

reflux condenser. The mixture was cooled for 30 min at ambient<br />

temperature and then washed twice with 20 mL of distilled water.<br />

The solution was allowed to stand for 30 min for separation. Then,<br />

the solution in the lower layer was retrieved for complete removal<br />

of the solvent in a rotary evaporator (EYELSA; Rikakai). Fifteen<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1927


1928<br />

millilitres of 500 mol/L NaOH/MeOH, 5 mL of 14% BF3/methanol,<br />

and 10 mL of n-heptane were added and heated for 5 min. The<br />

fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were extracted from the saturated<br />

sodium chloride mixture (5 mL) with hexane (10 mL). The mixture<br />

was then separated by placing it in a fractional funnel to retrieve<br />

the organic portion in the upper phase. The solution was then<br />

concentrated to a final volume of 1 mL with a gentle stream<br />

of nitrogen gas after dehydration by anhydrous sodium sulfate.<br />

One millilitre of isopentanoic acid [1% (w/v) in heptane] was<br />

injected into the specimen as an internal standard compound<br />

prior to carrying out GC-MS analysis. An HP 5890 series linked<br />

to an HP 5972 series with a DB-FFAP column (30 m length ×<br />

0.25 mm i.d. × 0.25 µm film thickness; J & W Scientific) was used<br />

to carry out the analysis of fatty acids. The oven temperature<br />

was maintained at 90 ◦ C for 2 min, increased to 240 ◦ Catarate<br />

of 8 ◦ Cmin −1 , and then maintained at 240 ◦ Cfor10min.The<br />

temperatures of injector and detector transfer line were 250<br />

and 280 ◦ C, respectively. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a<br />

constant flow rate of 0.8 mL min −1 , and the mass spectra were<br />

obtained at 70 eV through the EI method. The injection volume<br />

was 1.0 µL. The fatty acids in the doenjang were identified by<br />

comparing their retention times and mass spectra with those of<br />

authentic standards. The amounts of fatty acids in the doenjang<br />

were calculated by comparing their peak areas with those of the<br />

internal standard compounds. The quantitative data were the<br />

mean values of triplicate measurements.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the general<br />

linear model procedure in SPSS (version 12.0; SPSS, Chicago,<br />

IL, USA) to evaluate significant differences in the non-volatile<br />

metabolites including amino acids, organic acids, sugars and sugar<br />

derivatives, and fatty acids occurring in the doenjang. Duncan’s<br />

multi-rangetestwasusedwhenthesamplesexhibitedsignificantly<br />

different peak areas of non-volatile metabolites, with the level of<br />

significance set at P < 0.05. PCA was applied to raw values<br />

(n = 3) of the relative peak areas of metabolites to clarify the<br />

relationships between doenjang samples and the metabolites<br />

present according to fermentation times.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Profiling and analysis of non-volatile metabolites<br />

The diverse non-volatile metabolites in the doenjang, such as<br />

amino acids, organic acids, sugars, sugar derivatives, and fatty<br />

acids, were elucidated by GC-FID or GC-MS after derivatisation.<br />

Amino acids<br />

The profiling of amino acids was performed throughout 160 days<br />

of fermentation (Table 1). The main amino acids identified in the<br />

doenjang were leucine, isoleucine, valine, phenylalanine, lysine,<br />

glutamic acid, proalanine, alanine, tyrosin and histidine. After both<br />

40 and 100 days of fermentation, the relative amounts of leucine,<br />

phenylalanine, lysine and alanine were three times greater than<br />

the initial fermentation period. These levels did not show further<br />

increases but remained constant until 160 days of fermentation.<br />

A similar pattern was shown for tyrosine and histidine, but their<br />

levels decreased after 120 days of fermentation. Park et al. 8 found<br />

that between 90 and 120 days of fermentation, glutamic acid,<br />

which is related to the unique unami taste of doenjang, was a<br />

major occurring amino acid followed by proline, leucine, alanin,<br />

www.soci.org H-J Namgung et al.<br />

and lysine. Other studies have also detected glutamic acid as the<br />

most abundant amino acid in soybean paste during ripening and<br />

storage, providing a savoury taste. 8,15 Lysine and alanine, which<br />

provide a sweet taste, were predominantly found in the doenjang<br />

after 160 days of fermentation. The amino acids responsible for<br />

both sweet taste (glycine, alanine, serine and threonin) and unami<br />

flavour (glutamic acid and asparagine) increased between 140<br />

and 160 days of fermentation. Bitter taste components, namely<br />

leucine and isoleucine, were also principal amino acids detected in<br />

the fermented soybean paste. These amino acids exhibited similar<br />

patterns, showing no significant increases or decreases in amounts<br />

after 100 days of fermentation (Table 1).<br />

According to a study by An et al. 16 the contents of amino acids<br />

showed maximum levels at 60 days of fermentation, in which<br />

glutamic acid content was the highest and cysteine content was<br />

the lowest among them. In the current study, aminobutyric acid<br />

(ABA) was detected after 40 days of fermentation and showed<br />

its highest amount at 60 days of fermentation (Table 1). It was<br />

not detected, however, in the later stages of fermentation.<br />

Shizuka et al. confirmed this finding, reporting that ABA, abundant<br />

in soybeans, decreased as fermentation processed. 17 ABA has<br />

been recognised as a non-protein amino acid, biosynthesised<br />

by the decarboxylation of L-glutamic acid through the reaction of<br />

decarboxylase. 18 ABA, which is predominantly found in nature and<br />

in soybeans, is produced in negligible amounts in doenjang during<br />

fermentation. 17 ABAplays an importantrole in regulating neuronal<br />

excitability throughout the nervous system. In addition, it has<br />

shown biological activities for the treatment of depression, manicdepressive<br />

disorder, seizures, premenstrual dysphoric disorder,<br />

and anxiety. 19<br />

Organic acids<br />

Composition of organic acids in doenjang depends on the<br />

microflora used in manufacturing the meju. These microflora<br />

show variations according to inoculated microorganisms, their<br />

total counts, and growing conditions that can affect organic<br />

acid metabolism and energy efficiency by the microorganisms. 16<br />

Organic acid analysis is a quality indicator because certain<br />

identified compounds can greatly affect the quality of doenjang as<br />

a flavouring agent through increases in acidity and sweet aroma<br />

during fermentation. Although previous studies have analysed<br />

several kinds of organic acids, 8,20,21 the current study identified<br />

a more diverse range of organic acids including carbonic acid,<br />

glucaric acid, glycolic acid, 2-ketoglutaric acid and mandelic acid.<br />

The profile of 19 organic acids in doenjang during fermentation<br />

is shown in Table 2. Citric acid, lactic acid and pyroglutamic acid<br />

were the primary organic acids at the initial stage of fermentation<br />

(0–40 days). Citric acid gradually decreased according to the<br />

fermentation time. The results from our study suggest that citric<br />

acid occurring in the soybeans was metabolised and converted<br />

to acetic acid during fermentation, thus causing a significant<br />

amount of acetic acid. The formation of acetic acid is considered<br />

to provide an unpleasant flavour in fermented soy foods. 22 The<br />

current study detected an insignificant amount of acetic acid in<br />

the latter stage of fermentation (120–160 days), implying that this<br />

doenjang would not possess an unpleasant flavour due to acetic<br />

acid. For lactic acid and succinic acid, which are related to sourness,<br />

significant increases were found at 60 days of fermentation along<br />

with increasing patterns. Previous studies demonstrated similar<br />

results stating that lactic acid was highly formed in doenjang<br />

followed by acetic acid and citric acid. 8<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935


Metabolic profiling of doenjang www.soci.org<br />

Table 1. Changes in the contents of amino acids in doenjang during fermentation<br />

Relative peak area (mean ± SD) ∗<br />

Compound 0 day 20 days 40 days 60 days 80 days 100 days 120 days 140 days 160 days ID †<br />

ALA 3.631 ± 0.385a† 3.005 ± 0.317a 8.774 ± 0.470b 9.487 ± 1.036b 2.514 ± 5.028a 14.476 ± 1.282c 13.919 ± 0.423c 14.067 ± 1.428c 16.969 ± 2.828c A<br />

SAR 0.067 ± 0.386a 0.005 ± 0.009a 0.048 ± 0.035a 0.078 ± 0.018a 0.051 ± 0.038a 0.048 ± 0.057a 1.505 ± 2.846a 0.032 ± 0.037a 7.351 ± 1.310b A<br />

GLY 1.505 ± 0.387a 1.543 ± 0.197a 4.789 ± 0.192b 4.995 ± 0.669b 5.305 ± 0.347b 6.239 ± 0.405b 4.618 ± 3.041b 6.079 ± 0.550b 0.127 ± 0.019a A<br />

ABA – ‡ – 0.036 ± 0.042ab 0.122 ± 0.050c 0.069 ± 0.053bc 0.080 ± 0.054bc – 0.095 ± 0.064bc – A<br />

VAL 2.713 ± 0.296a 2.644 ± 0.187a 7.367 ± 0.528b 7.433 ± 0.572b 8.261 ± 0.339b 9.731 ± 0.555c 9.634 ± 0.516c 9.396 ± 0.408c 11.189 ± 1.275d A<br />

LEU 6.060 ± 0.559a 6.664 ± 1.012a 16.380 ± 1.348b 16.971 ± 2.324b 18.416 ± 2.071bc 23.305 ± 1.146d 24.109 ± 3.591d 21.388 ± 2.440cd 24.092 ± 2.511d A<br />

ILE 2.852 ± 0.348a 3.482 ± 0.892a 8.360 ± 0.587b 8.821 ± 1.053b 9.618 ± 0.691b 12.182 ± 0.518c 12.583 ± 1.656c 11.565 ± 1.078c 12.827 ± 0.946c A<br />

THR 0.602 ± 0.245a 0.440 ± 0.153a 0.713 ± 0.866a – 2.563 ± 1.558b 3.043 ± 0.409b 4.534 ± 0.769c 4.885 ± 1.363c 3.614 ± 0.834bc A<br />

SER 1.783 ± 0.190ab 1.221 ± 0.717a 2.849 ± 1.008b 2.618 ± 0.468b 1.723 ± 1.789ab 1.260 ± 0.177a 1.792 ± 0.308ab 2.888 ± 0.873b 2.067 ± 0.341ab A<br />

PRO 3.715 ± 0.278a 2.241 ± 0.714a 7.111 ± 0.873b 6.460 ± 1.437b 7.381 ± 1.003a 6.454 ± 1.129b 6.513 ± 0.689b 7.281 ± 1.352b 9.006 ± 1.672c A<br />

ASN 0.791 ± 0.097b 0.505 ± 0.110a 1.285 ± 0.064de 1.412 ± 0.132de 0.973 ± 0.193bc 1.155 ± 0.235cd 1.172 ± 0.186cd 1.205 ± 0.211cd 1.522 ± 0.318e A<br />

TPR – 0.052 ± 0.020ab – 0.094 ± 0.016bc – 0.105 ± 0.014bc 0.106 ± 0.090bc 0.129 ± 0.026c 0.061 ± 0.071ab A<br />

ASP 2.857 ± 0.142a 2.237 ± 0.597a 7.588 ± 1.271f 5.726 ± 1.408de 7.634 ± 1.181f 4.565 ± 0.879cd 4.050 ± 0.608bc 4.850 ± 0.978cde 6.294 ± 0.950ef A<br />

MET 0.558 ± 0.163a 0.895 ± 0.095a 1.912 ± 0.277b 2.021 ± 0.228bc 2.347 ± 0.114cd 2.539 ± 0.292de 2.857 ± 0.300ef 2.534 ± 0.309de 3.072 ± 0.524f A<br />

GLU 2.804 ± 0.136a 2.915 ± 0.129a 7.417 ± 1.152bc 4.857 ± 3.278a 7.600 ± 0.792bc 9.372 ± 1.329c 6.928 ± 0.708b 7.451 ± 0.989bc 9.420 ± 0.664e A<br />

PHE 5.252 ± 0.666a 6.245 ± 1.384a 14.599 ± 1.678bc 13.651 ± 4.655b 16.325 ± 2.982bcd 21.528 ± 0.518e 21.955 ± 4.121e 18.676 ± 4.420cde 20.184 ± 1.417de A<br />

AAA – 0.097 ± 0.025ab 0.223 ± 0.067bc 0.228 ± 0.063bc 0.233 ± 0.115bc 0.357 ± 0.071cd 0.515 ± 0.246d 0.462 ± 0.175d 0.365 ± 0.075cd A<br />

ORN 0.561 ± 0.058a – – – – – – 7.714 ± 4.273b – A<br />

LYS 4.883 ± 0.722a 6.098 ± 2.227a 16.452 ± 3.076ab 19.401 ± 6.871ab 22.762 ± 9.607bc 37.489 ± 2.943cd 40.723 ± 17.457d 36.506 ± 22.211cd 36.915 ± 4.379cd A<br />

HIS 0.482 ± 0.114a 1.563 ± 0.725a 4.898 ± 0.761b 4.936 ± 1.266b 5.523 ± 2.348b 9.898 ± 0.739c 11.514 ± 3.929c 5.876 ± 3.416b 4.610 ± 0.402b A<br />

TYR 2.219 ± 0.398a 3.463 ± 0.632a 8.580 ± 1.028cd 7.422 ± 1.202c 8.228 ± 1.319c 11.802 ± 1.015e 9.962 ± 1.701d 5.604 ± 1.544b 7.575 ± 0.382c A<br />

TRP 0.555 ± 0.193a 1.436 ± 0.338a 3.599 ± 0.435b 3.291 ± 0.795b 3.404 ± 1.033b 6.328 ± 0.413c 6.312 ± 1.748c 5.398 ± 2.540c 4.851 ± 0.495bc A<br />

ALA, alanine; SAR, sarcosine; GLY, glycine; ABA, aminobutyric acid; VAL, valine; LEU, leucine; ILE, isoleucine; THR, threonine; SER, serine; PRO, proline;ASN,asparagine;TRP,trytophan;ASP,asparticacid;<br />

MET, methionine; GLU, glutamic acid; PHE, phenylalanine; AAA, aminoaldipic acid; ORN, ornithine; LYS, lysine; HIS, histidine; TYR, tyrosine; TPR, thioproline.<br />

∗ Each value is the mean of the relative peak areas (n = 3) to that of an internal standard with the standard deviation. Values with different letters are significantly different at α = 0.05.<br />

† Metabolites were identified on the basis of the following criteria: A, mass spectrum and retention time were consistent with those of an authentic standard).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

‡ Below the limit of detection.<br />

1929


1930<br />

Table 2. Changes in the contents of organic acids in doenjang during fermentation<br />

Relative peak area (mean ± SD) ∗<br />

Compound 0 day 20 days 40 days 60 days 80 days 100 days 120 days 140 days 160 days ID †<br />

www.soci.org H-J Namgung et al.<br />

Acetic acid – ‡ – – – – – 0.017 ± 0.005b 0.019 ± 0.003bc 0.025 ± 0.009c B<br />

Carbonic acid 0.053 ± 0.006a† 0.166 ± 0.129abc 0.121 ± 0.027ab 0.270 ± 0.067bcd 0.340 ± 0.072cde 0.385 ± 0.209de 0.362 ± 0.099de 0.403 ± 0.105de 0.486 ± 0.085e B<br />

Citric acid 1.015 ± 0.103d 1.120 ± 0.050d 1.009 ± 0.020d 0.511 ± 0.257ab 0.806 ± 0.027c 0.676 ± 0.027bc 0.580 ± 0.001ab 0.475 ± 0.029a 0.677 ± 0.030bc A<br />

Formic acid – 0.028 ± 0.009b – 0.024 ± 0.005ab 0.022 ± 0.009ab 0.054 ± 0.035cd 0.038 ± 0.010bc 0.039 ± 0.013bc 0.065 ± 0.001d B<br />

Fumaric acid – 0.008 ± 0.001a 0.037 ± 0.030b 0.034 ± 0.001b 0.034 ± 0.003b 0.039 ± 0.001b 0.053 ± 0.006bc 0.067 ± 0.004c 0.058 ± 0.003c A<br />

Glucaric acid 0.075 ± 0.010a 0.125 ± 0.017cd 0.156 ± 0.002e 0.133 ± 0.013d 0.122 ± 0.007bcd 0.108 ± 0.007bc 0.106 ± 0.003b 0.120 ± 0.008bcd 0.130 ± 0.007d B<br />

Glycolic acid 0.028 ± 0.002b 0.025 ± 0.001a 0.028 ± 0.001b 0.025 ± 0.001a 0.029 ± 0.001bc 0.028 ± 0.001b 0.028 ± 0.001b 0.029 ± 0.001bc 0.030 ± 0.001c A<br />

2-Ketoglutaric acid 0.032 ± 0.001a 0.041 ± 0.001ab 0.037 ± 0.002a 0.041 ± 0.004ab 0.038 ± 0.006ab 0.048 ± 0.014b 0.061 ± 0.001c 0.035 ± 0.004a 0.037 ± 0.002a B<br />

Lactic acid 0.806 ± 0.0630a 1.097 ± 0.014a 1.466 ± 0.037b 3.198 ± 0.209d 2.310 ± 0.074c 3.074 ± 0.100d 3.362 ± 0.251d 4.143 ± 0.450e 3.920 ± 0.256e A<br />

Maleic acid 0.011 ± 0.001ab 0.021 ± 0.002c 0.021 ± 0.002c 0.018 ± 0.001bc 0.020 ± 0.001bc 0.007 ± 0.011a 0.017 ± 0.001bc 0.016 ± 0.002bc 0.010 ± 0.009ab A<br />

Malic acid 0.096 ± 0.010d 0.113 ± 0.004e 0.101 ± 0.001d 0.046 ± 0.001b 0.078 ± 0.002c 0.049 ± 0.011b 0.028 ± 0.002a 0.021 ± 0.004a 0.023 ± 0.001a A<br />

Malonic acid 0.022 ± 0.002a 0.023 ± 0.001a 0.024 ± 0.002ab 0.027 ± 0.001b 0.027 ± 0.001b 0.028 ± 0.002b 0.033 ± 0.004c 0.036 ± 0.002c 0.035 ± 0.001c A<br />

Manelic acid 0.042 ± 0.007a 0.081 ± 0.049a 0.060 ± 0.004a 0.231 ± 0.013b 0.298 ± 0.023c 0.360 ± 0.041d 0.296 ± 0.007c 0.185 ± 0.025b 0.227 ± 0.028bc B<br />

Oxalic acid 0.015 ± 0.002bc 0.022 ± 0.004c 0.012 ± 0.010abc 0.006 ± 0.010ab 0.010 ± 0.008abc 0.005 ± 0.008ab – – 0.005 ± 0.008ab A<br />

Pipecolic acid 0.011 ± 0.002abc – 0.007 ± 0.012ab 0.025 ± 0.007bc 0.024 ± 0.005bc 0.017 ± 0.030abc 0.034 ± 0.005cd 0.027 ± 0.006bcd 0.049 ± 0.015d B<br />

Propionic acid 0.015 ± 0.005a 0.047 ± 0.032a 0.036 ± 0.007a 0.073 ± 0.020ab 0.085 ± 0.027abc 0.217 ± 0.136d 0.187 ± 0.066cd 0.171 ± 0.072bcd 0.266 ± 0.037d A<br />

Pyroglutamic acid 0.257 ± 0.025a 0.451 ± 0.008b 0.552 ± 0.021b 0.768 ± 0.022c 0.713 ± 0.041c 0.678 ± 0.133c 0.804 ± 0.053c 0.935 ± 0.073d 1.024 ± 0.118d A<br />

Succinic acid 0.026 ± 0.002a 0.043 ± 0.003bc 0.046 ± 0.002cd 0.047 ± 0.003cd 0.047 ± 0.004bc 0.044 ± 0.001bc 0.045 ± 0.003b 0.051 ± 0.003d 0.046 ± 0.001bc A<br />

Vanillic acid 0.018 ± 0.002a 0.025 ± 0.002b 0.017 ± 0.001a 0.031 ± 0.002b 0.029 ± 0.002b 0.032 ± 0.005bc 0.037 ± 0.006cd 0.042 ± 0.006de 0.048 ± 0.004e A<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935<br />

∗ Each value is the mean of the relative peak areas (n = 3) to that of an internal standard with the standard deviation. Values with different letters are significantly different at α = 0.05.<br />

† Metabolites were identified on the basis of the following criteria: A, mass spectrum and retention time were consistent with those of an authentic standard; B, mass spectrum was consistent with that of<br />

Wiley 275 Imass spectral or by manual interpretation (tentative identification).<br />

‡ Below the limit of detection.


Metabolic profiling of doenjang www.soci.org<br />

Table 3. Changes in the contents of sugars and sugar derivatives in doenjang during fermentation<br />

Relative peak area (mean ± SD) ∗<br />

Compound 0 day 20 days 40 days 60 days 80 days 100 days 120 days 140 days 160 days ID †<br />

Erythrose 0.468 ± 0.052a† 0.628 ± 0.062ab 0.665 ± 0.027ab 2.307 ± 2.804b 0.713 ± 0.011ab 0.758 ± 0.020ab 0.593 ± 0.013ab 0.721 ± 0.026ab 0.736 ± 0.026ab B<br />

Xylitol 0.373 ± 0.035a 0.470 ± 0.003ab 0.445 ± 0.007ab 0.451 ± 0.270ab 0.568 ± 0.057abc 0.720 ± 0.043bcd 0.484 ± 0.349ab 0.771 ± 0.084cd 0.876 ± 0.050d A<br />

Ribitol 0.010 ± 0.001a 0.022 ± 0.001ab 0.031 ± 0.001ab 0.079 ± 0.033cd 0.039 ± 0.0339ab 0.106 ± 0.007d 0.053 ± 0.033bc 0.100 ± 0.011d 0.090 ± 0.006d A<br />

Ribonic acid 0.060 ± 0.004a 0.156 ± 0.014ab 0.176 ± 0.016ab 0.746 ± 0.982b 0.192 ± 0.015ab 0.230 ± 0.028ab 0.167 ± 0.025ab 0.194 ± 0.007ab 0.190 ± 0.018ab B<br />

Inositol 1.062 ± 0.296a 2.030 ± 0.033bc 2.188 ± 0.021bcd 0.894 ± 0.100a 2.657 ± 0.358cd 2.343 ± 1.176bcd 1.428 ± 0.825ab 3.005 ± 0.345cd 3.045 ± 0.197d A<br />

Glucosamine 0.069 ± 0.004cd 0.089 ± 0.037d 0.080 ± 0.003d 0.036 ± 0.021ab 0.046 ± 0.005bc 0.034 ± 0.004ab 0.018 ± 0.003a 0.020 ± 0.003ab 0.020 ± 0.004ab B<br />

Mannitol 1.064 ± 0.108a 1.546 ± 0.024a 1.530 ± 0.019a 1.072 ± 0.930a 1.581 ± 0.213a 1.802 ± 0.097a 1.060 ± 0.867a 1.752 ± 0.204a 1.893 ± 0.140a A<br />

Glucitol 0.122 ± 0.018abc 0.123 ± 0.003abc 0.109 ± 0.004ab 0.083 ± 0.072a 0.169 ± 0.025cd 0.160 ± 0.007bcd 0.159 ± 0.030bcd 0.208 ± 0.012d 0.436 ± 0.028e A<br />

Galactonic acid 0.113 ± 0.004bc 0.193 ± 0.006d 0.197 ± 0.003d 0.195 ± 0.123d 0.169 ± 0.024cd 0.104 ± 0.016bc 0.079 ± 0.003b 0.074 ± 0.017b – ‡ B<br />

Fructose 0.009 ± 0.002b 0.022 ± 0.007d 0.025 ± 0.001d – 0.016 ± 0.004c – – – – A<br />

Galactose 0.039 ± 0.005a 0.068 ± 0.010ab 0.070 ± 0.003ab 0.104 ± 0.068b 0.071 ± 0.012ab 0.057 ± 0.025ab 0.055 ± 0.002a 0.042 ± 0.015a 0.042 ± 0.012a B<br />

Glucose 0.185 ± 0.008d 0.270 ± 0.051e 0.113 ± 0.006c 0.055 ± 0.018ab 0.078 ± 0.011bc 0.077 ± 0.019bc 0.039 ± 0.011a 0.044 ± 0.007ab 0.027 ± 0.006a A<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

∗ Each value is the mean of the relative peak areas (n = 3) to that of an internal standard with the standard deviation. Values with different letters are significantly different at α = 0.05.<br />

† Metabolites were identified on the basis of the following criteria: A, mass spectrum and retention time were consistent with those of an authentic standard; B, mass spectrum was consistent with that of<br />

Wiley 275 Imass spectral or by manual interpretation (tentative identification).<br />

‡ Below the limit of detection.<br />

1931


1932<br />

Table 4. Changes in the contents of fatty acids in doenjang during fermentation<br />

Relative peak area (mean ± SD) ∗<br />

Compound 0 day 20 days 40 days 60 days 80 days 100 days 120 days 140 days 160 days ID †<br />

www.soci.org H-J Namgung et al.<br />

C10 : 0 – ‡ 0.417 ± 0.124c† 0.140 ± 0.008b – – – – – – A<br />

C12 : 0 – 0.353 ± 0.147c 0.066 ± 0.005b – – – – – – A<br />

C14 : 0 0.839 ± 0.105b 0.587 ± 0.067a 0.620 ± 0.091a 0.600 ± 0.158a 0.576 ± 0.039a 0.886 ± 0.012b 1.753 ± 0.362d 1.406 ± 0.155c 1.420 ± 0.288c A<br />

C15 : 0 – 0.145 ± 0.051c 0.134 ± 0.020bc 0.117 ± 0.012b 0.123 ± 0.033bc 0.213 ± 0.011d 0.536 ± 0.167g 0.335 ± 0.056e 0.414 ± 0.232f A<br />

C16 : 0 18.386 ± 3.745ab 62.596 ± 12.530c 90.986 ± 18.028e 89.365 ± 6.913e 15.083 ± 2.642a 23.647 ± 5.320b 112.573 ± 19.653f 84.262 ± 15.490de 81.845 ± 5.040d A<br />

C16 : 1 0.757 ± 0.157a 0.879 ± 0.051a 1.022 ± 0.126ab 1.444 ± 0.271c 0.891 ± 0.048a 1.364 ± 0.016bc 3.247 ± 0.992e 2.977 ± 0.867de 2.688 ± 1.360d A<br />

C17 : 0 0.162 ± 0.023a 0.469 ± 0.154b 0.414 ± 0.088b 0.154 ± 0.043a 0.346 ± 0.185ab 0.855 ± 0.038c 2.194 ± 1.255e 1.031 ± 0.434cd 1.184 ± 1.149d A<br />

C18 : 0 5.198 ± 1.127a 68.421 ± 16.709d 14.674 ± 1.147b 25.073 ± 10.202c 6.213 ± 2.676a 24.996 ± 4.808c 24.624 ± 6.255c 27.993 ± 15.899e 25.218 ± 18.461c A<br />

C18 : 1 77.164 ± 15.143b 102.781 ± 16.254c 160.985 ± 1.116d 32.147 ± 6.754a 114.099 ± 11.791c 149.206 ± 14.362d 217.597 ± 16.246f 188.409 ± 12.415e 189.553 ± 19.037e A<br />

C18 : 2 107.104 ± 16.203b 105.653 ± 9.936b 100.674 ± 29.289b 50.205 ± 2.795a 35.816 ± 10.946a 212.220 ± 10.038c 349.758 ± 17.651f 257.254 ± 8.719d 306.127 ± 14.751e A<br />

C18 : 3 21.769 ± 3.188a 79.002 ± 11.248d 74.376 ± 9.259d 49.647 ± 5.043bc 21.637 ± 8.199a 40.518 ± 3.678b 52.567 ± 13.683c 53.805 ± 10.844c 49.343 ± 17.736bc A<br />

C20 : 0 1.053 ± 0.970a 2.281 ± 0.325bcd 1.143 ± 0.114ab 1.755 ± 0.402abc 1.436 ± 0.112abc 2.447 ± 0.189cd 6.580 ± 5.711f 3.437 ± 0.446de 4.525 ± 1.918e A<br />

C20 : 1 0.712 ± 0.064a 1.552 ± 0.424c 1.074 ± 0.084ab 1.556 ± 0.279c 1.203 ± 0.129bc 2.029 ± 0.201d 2.909 ± 0.611e 2.781 ± 0.454e 3.579 ± 1.604f A<br />

C20:2 – – – 0.302 ± 0.058b 0.282 ± 0.032b 0.447 ± 0.122c – – – A<br />

C22 : 0 3.893 ± 5.893d 1.634 ± 0.368b 1.202 ± 0.104b 2.231 ± 0.235c 1.537 ± 0.110b 2.649 ± 0.261c – 3.694 ± 0.569d 11.271 ± 0.118e A<br />

C23 : 0 – 0.321 ± 0.014cd 0.340 ± 0.018cd 0.211 ± 0.054b 0.284 ± 0.258bcd 0.271 ± 0.067bc 1.523 ± 0.347e 0.388 ± 0.061d 0.238 ± 0.412bc A<br />

C10 : 0, capric acid; C12 : 0, lauric acid; C14 : 0, myristic acid; C15 : 0, pentadecylic acid; C16 : 0, palmitic acid; C16 : 1, palmitoleic acid; C17 : 0, margaric acid; C18 : 0, stearic acid; C18 : 1, oleic acid; C18 : 2,<br />

linoleic acid; C18 : 3, linolenic acid; C20 : 0, arachidic acid; C20 : 1, eicosanic acid; C20 : 2, eicosadienoic acid; C22:0,behenicacid;C23:0,tricosanoic acid.<br />

∗ Each value is the mean of the relative peak areas (n = 3) to that of an internal standard with the standard deviation. Values with different letters are significantly different at α = 0.05.<br />

† Metabolites were identified on the basis of the following criteria: A, mass spectrum and retention time were consistent with those of an authentic standard).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935<br />

‡ Below the limit of detection.


Metabolic profiling of doenjang www.soci.org<br />

Mandelic acid, propionic acid and glucaric acid were detected<br />

in negligible amounts in the doenjang at the beginning of<br />

fermentation, but rapidly increased after 60, 100 and 120 days<br />

fermentation, respectively. A previous study reported a similar<br />

finding where an insignificant amount of glutaric acid was initially<br />

found but then increased up to 60 days of fermentation. 20<br />

Sugars and sugar derivatives<br />

Sugars such as glucose, fructose and galactose were identified<br />

during doenjang fermentation (Table 3). Glucose was identified as<br />

a primary sugar in doenjang at the initial stage of fermentation and<br />

its amount was reduced after 20 days of fermentation. Fructose,<br />

the sweetest sugar, was found in an insignificant amount, and was<br />

not detected after 100 days of fermentation. This finding is quite<br />

different from an earlier study that reported measuring 1937 mg of<br />

fructose in 100 g of commercial soybean paste. 5 Previous studies<br />

suggested that the composition of free sugars in doenjang can<br />

differ according to soybean cultivar or the ingredient mixture for<br />

meju manufacture. 23 Yoo found a difference in the composition<br />

of major sugars between a traditionally manufactured doenjang<br />

and a commercial doenjang. 21 Furthermore, glucose and total<br />

sugars were higher in doenjang that was inoculated with Bacillus<br />

natto or Aspergillus oryzae compared to a doenjang manufactured<br />

by traditional methods. 16 Overall, in this study, levels of total<br />

sugars decreased as fermentation proceeded. A major reason for<br />

reductions in total sugars during fermentation is that a portion<br />

of the sugars is utilised as substrate for microbial growth and<br />

organic acid fermentation. 24 Interestingly, in the current study,<br />

glucosamine is an amino sugar that was formed in the doenjang.<br />

It is plausible that glucosamine was synthesised through the<br />

donation of an amine from glutamine to glucose contained in<br />

the soybeans. 25 Since glucosamine is a normal constituent of<br />

glycosaminoglycans in joint cartilage, it is commonly used for the<br />

treatment of osteoarthritis. 26 Erythrose, a tetrose carbohydrate,<br />

was also detected in a significant amount in the doenjang during<br />

fermentation (Table 3).<br />

To date, limited information has been reported on the<br />

identification of sugar derivatives in fermented soybean paste. The<br />

current study identified eight sugar derivatives, and significant<br />

amounts of xylitol, inositol and mannitol were detected in the<br />

doenjang during fermentation (Table 3). Xylitol, a low-calorie<br />

alternative to table sugar, showed an increasing pattern during<br />

fermentation. After 140 days of fermentation, the amount of xylitol<br />

detected in the doenjang was twice that at the beginning of<br />

fermentation. Our results also showed a remarkable increase in<br />

inositol during fermentation. Inositol is a chemical compound with<br />

a formula containing a six-fold alcohol of cyclohexane hexol, and is<br />

involved in a number of biological processes as the basis for several<br />

signalling and secondary messenger molecules. 27 Inthecaseof<br />

mannitol, a significant amount was formed during fermentation<br />

(Table 3). Mannitol is assumed to have several beneficial effects<br />

as an antioxidant as well as a non-metabolisable sweetener. 28<br />

Insignificant amounts of ribitol and ribonic acid were also found.<br />

Finally, results from current study showed that the amount of<br />

glucitol, known as sorbitol, steadily increased after 80 days of<br />

fermentation and the highest level of glucitol was found at<br />

160 days of fermentation. This result implies that glucitol may<br />

be derived from either glucose or fructose<br />

Fatty acids<br />

A total of 16 fatty acids, including saturated and unsaturated<br />

fatty acids, were identified using GC-MS. Overall, relatively higher<br />

contents of unsaturated fatty acids than saturated fatty acids<br />

were observed during fermentation (Table 4). Most unsaturated<br />

fatty acids showed increasing patterns between 120 and 140 days<br />

of fermentation, and then gradually decreased. A previous study<br />

showed similar results in which unsaturated fatty acids consisted of<br />

81.97% of the total fatty acids in doenjang prepared by traditional<br />

methods. 8 At the initial stage of fermentation (20–40 days), oleic<br />

acid (C18 : 1), linoleic acid (C18 : 2), palmitic acid (C16 : 2) and<br />

linolenic acid (C18 : 3) were found as major fatty acids in the<br />

doenjang (Table 4). The relative amounts of both oleic acid and<br />

linoleic acid increased as fermentation progressed. In particular,<br />

a greater amount of linoleic acid was detected after 160 days<br />

of fermentation, approximately three times that occurring at<br />

the beginning of fermentation. Similar to our results, previous<br />

studies have reported that fatty acids amounts were found in the<br />

following order: linoleic acid>oleic acid>linolenic acid > palmitic<br />

acid. 8,29 Park et al. 9 also reported thatmystric acid (C14 : 0), palmitic<br />

acid (C16 : 0), stearic acid (C18 : 0), oleic acid (C18 : 1), linoleic acid<br />

(C18 : 2) and linolenic acid (C18 : 3) were identified, and linoleic acid<br />

was the most abundant fatty acid, consisting of 38.56–51.86% of<br />

the total fatty acids. Both pentadecylic acid (C15 : 0) and margaric<br />

acid (C17 : 0) were identified, but insignificant amounts were<br />

observed in the doenjang during fermentation.<br />

Principal components analysis<br />

Figure 1 provides the score plot that illustrates the outcomes<br />

of doenjang metabolite analysis according to PCA. As shown in<br />

Fig. 1, significant changes in metabolites are clearly distinguished<br />

according to fermentation time in the score plot generated by<br />

combining PC1 (52% of the total variance) with PC2 (19% of<br />

the total variance). Overall, the plots are aggregated for each<br />

fermentation time, and similarities in doenjang metabolites during<br />

fermentation can be inferred from the relative variables of these<br />

plots. Significant differences in metabolites during the initial<br />

and interim stage of fermentation (positive PC1 dimension) can<br />

be separated from those of the latter stage of fermentation<br />

(negative PC1 dimension) mainly in the score of PC1. However,<br />

there were no significant changes in metabolites between 60 and<br />

80 days or 100 and 120 days of fermentation. Figure 2 illustrate<br />

the loading plots of metabolites contributing to changes in<br />

the plots for each fermentation stage in principal components<br />

analysis. In the analysis of the primary principal components,<br />

malic acid (no. 50), glucosamine (no. 64), oxalic acid (no. 53),<br />

fructose (no. 68), galactronic acid (no. 67), citric acid (no. 42),<br />

lysine (no. 36), aminoaldipic acid (no. 33), lactic acid (no. 48),<br />

fumaric acid (no. 44), pyrogultamic acid (no. 56), carbonic acid<br />

(no. 41), alanine (no. 17), methionine (no. 30), leucine (no. 23),<br />

isoleucine (no. 22), phenylalanine (no. 32), tryptophan (no. 39),<br />

malonic acid (no. 51), propionic acid (no. 55) and eicosanic<br />

acid (no. 13) were found to be the metabolites contributing to<br />

changes (Fig. 2). Among them, malic acid, glucosamine, oxalic<br />

acid, fructose, galactonic acid and citric acid, with positive<br />

absolute values, were found in significant amounts in the<br />

early stage of fermentation (0–40 days). Furthermore, fructose,<br />

D-glucosamine, malic acid, oxalic acid and citric acid were found<br />

to be the metabolites mainly contributing to the differentiation<br />

of the doenjang in the initial stage of fermentation. Meanwhile,<br />

lysine, aminoaldipic acid, lactic acid, fumaric acid, pyrogultamic<br />

acid, carbonic acid, alanine, methionine, leucine, isoleucine,<br />

phenylalanine, tryptophan, malonic acid, propionic acid and<br />

eicosanic acid were significantly responsible for changes during<br />

the latter stage of doenjang fermentation. The metabolites that<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1933


1934<br />

www.soci.org H-J Namgung et al.<br />

Figure 1. PCA score plot of metabolites in the doenjang according to fermentation period by combining PC1 and PC2.<br />

Figure 2. PCA loading plot showing the variables contributing to the PC1 score plots (top) and PC2 score plots (bottom).<br />

determined the characteristics of the doenjang after 60 days<br />

of fermentation can be explained by the secondary principal<br />

component (Fig. 2). Myristic acid (no. 3), linoleic acid (no. 10),<br />

eicosadienoic acid (no. 14), behenic acid (no. 15), sacrosine (no.<br />

18), glycine (no. 19), aminobutyric acid (no. 20), glucaric acid (no.<br />

45), glycolic acid (no. 46), erythrose (no. 59), ribonic acid (no.<br />

62) and glucitol (no. 66) showed decreasing tendencies while<br />

behenic acid, SAR, glycolic acid and glucitol increased during the<br />

fermentation period.<br />

Overall, it was possible to differentiate the doenjang samples<br />

according to fermentation time by assessing non-volatile metabolites<br />

such as amino acids, organic acids, fatty acids, sugars and<br />

sugar derivatives. The sugar derivatives were considered as main<br />

contributors to discriminate the doenjang samples in the early<br />

stage of fermentation, while the amino acids were indicators for<br />

the latter stages of fermentation. Organic acids were also involved<br />

in determining changes in the doenjang by presenting increasing<br />

patterns as fermentation time progressed. The major metabolites<br />

contributing to the differentiation of the doenjang during fermentation<br />

were leucine (no. 22), isoleucine (no. 23), aminoaldipic acid<br />

(no. 33), lysine (no. 36), malic acid (no. 50), oxalic acid (no. 53) and<br />

glucosamine (no. 64).<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The GC-MS technique followed by PCA, used for non-volatile<br />

metabolite profiling of doenjang, successfully demonstrated<br />

changes in composition patterns as well as difference in<br />

metabolites according to fermentation period. Malic acid, oxalic<br />

acid, citric acid, glucosamine and fructose were found to be the<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935


Metabolic profiling of doenjang www.soci.org<br />

metabolites that differentiated the doenjang samples at the initial<br />

stage of fermentation, while pipecolic acid, malonic acid, formic<br />

acid, propionic acid, mandelic acid and xylitol were the metabolites<br />

that differentiated the samples after 100 days of fermentation. A<br />

set of metabolites was able to be determined representing the<br />

quality of doenjang during fermentation, and which might also be<br />

correlated to taste ingredients, flavour, nutrition and physiology<br />

activities that are claimed to be dependent on the quality control<br />

of commercial doenjang.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

This study was supported by research grants from the Korea<br />

Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) for Biofoods <strong>Research</strong>,<br />

Ministry of Science and Technology, South Korea (no.<br />

M1051012000306N101200310).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Jung KO, Park SY and Park KY, Longer aging time increases the<br />

anticancer and antimetastatic properties of doenjang. Nutrition<br />

22:539–545 (2006).<br />

2 Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim BH, Kang SG and Jung ST, Fermentation of<br />

doenjang prepared with sea salts. Korean J Food Sci Technol<br />

32:1365–1370 (2000).<br />

3 Lim SY, Park KY and Rhee SH, Anticancer Effect of doenjang in in vitro<br />

dulforhodamineb(SRB)assay.JKoreanSocFoodSciNutr 28:240–245<br />

(1999).<br />

4 Kim TW, Lee JH, Kim SE, Park MH, Chang HC and Kim HY, Analysis of<br />

microbial communities in doenjang, a Korean fermented soybean<br />

paste, using nested PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.<br />

Int J Food Microbiol 131:265–271 (2009).<br />

5 Park HK, Gil B and Kim JK, Characteristics of taste components of<br />

commercial soybean paste. Food Sci Biotechnol 11:376–379 (2002).<br />

6 Yoo SK, Kang SM and Noh YS, Quality properties on soy bean pastes<br />

made with microorganisms isolated from traditional soy bean<br />

pastes. Korean J Food Sci Technol 32:1266–1270 (2000).<br />

7 Kim JK, Biologically active components of soy-fermented foods. Korea<br />

Soybean Digest 19:1–7 (2002).<br />

8 Park SK, Seo KI, Choi SH, Moon JS and Lee YH, Quality assessment of<br />

commercial doenjang prepared by traditional method. J Korean Soc<br />

Food Sci Nutr 29:211–217 (2000).<br />

9 Park JS, Lee MY and Lee TS, Compositions of sugars and fatty acids<br />

in soybean paste (doenjang) prepared with different microbial<br />

sources. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 24:917–924 (1995).<br />

10 Gullberg J, Jonsson P, Nordstrom A, Sjostrom M and Moritz T,<br />

Design of experiments: an efficient strategy to identify factors<br />

influencing extraction and derivatization of Arabidopsis thaliana<br />

samples in metabolomic studies with gas chromatography/mass<br />

spectrometry. Anal Biochem 331:283–295 (2004).<br />

11 Fiehn O, Metabolomics – the link between genotypes and<br />

phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol 48:155–171 (2002).<br />

12 Kopka J, Current challenges and developments in GC-MS based<br />

metabolite profiling technology. J Biotechnol 124:312–322 (2006).<br />

13 Jansen JJ,Hoefsloot HCJ,Boelens HFM,Greef JandSmilde AK,Analysis<br />

of longitudinal metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 20:2438–2446<br />

(2004).<br />

14 Metcalfe LD, Schmitz AA and Pelka JR, The rapid preparation of<br />

fatty acid esters for gas chromatographic analysis. Anal Chem<br />

38:514–515 (1966).<br />

15 Jung BM and Roh SB, Physicochemical quality comparison of<br />

commercial doenjang and traditional green tea doenjang. JKorean<br />

Soc Food Sci Nutr 33:132–139 (2004).<br />

16 An HS, Bae JS and Lee TS, Comparison of free amino acids, sugars, and<br />

organic acids in soybean paste prepared with various organisms.<br />

J Korean Agric Chem Soc 30:345–350 (1987).<br />

17 Shizuka F, Kido Y, Nakazawa T, Kitajima H, Aizawa C, Kayamura H, et al,<br />

Antihypertensive effect of gamma-amino butyric acid enriched soy<br />

productsinspontaneouslyhypertensiverats.Biofactors22:165–167<br />

(2004).<br />

18 Navayan VS and Nair PM, Metabolism zymology and possible roles of<br />

4-aminobutyrate higher plants. Phytochemistry 29:367–375 (1990).<br />

19 Sustková-FiserováM, Vávrová J and Krsiak M, Brain levels of GABA,<br />

glutamate and aspartate in sociable, aggressive and timid mice: an<br />

in vivo microdialysis study. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 30:79–84 (2009).<br />

20 Kim MJ and Rhee HS, Studies on the changes of taste compounds<br />

during soy paste fermentation (II). KoreanJFoodCookSci 9:257–260<br />

(1993).<br />

21 Yoo SM, Quality characteristics of doenjang prepared using selective<br />

starters. PhD thesis. Department of Food Science and Technology,<br />

Graduate School, Chonbuk National University, Chonbuk, Korea<br />

(2003).<br />

22 Sulisyo J, Natioshi T, Kazaumi F and Kan K, Production of Natto starter.<br />

J Food Technol 35:280–281 (1988).<br />

23 Hwang ES, Quality of 4 precommended soybean cultivars for meju and<br />

doenjang.PhDthesis.Department of Food Science and Technology,<br />

Graduate School, Chungnam National University, Taejeon, Korea<br />

(2002).<br />

24 Joo HK, Kim DH and Oh KT, Chemical composition changes in<br />

fermented doenjang depend on doenjang koji and its mixture.<br />

J Korean Soc Agric Chem Biotechnol 35:351–360 (1992).<br />

25 Sayeski PP and Kudlow JE, Glucose metabolism to glucosamine<br />

is necessary for glucose stimulation of transforming growth<br />

factor–gene transcription. JBiolChem271:15237–15243 (1996).<br />

26 Reginster JY, Deroisy R, Rovati LC, Lee RL, Lejeune E, Bruyere O, et al,<br />

Long-term effects of glucosamine sulphate on osteoarthritis<br />

progression: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet<br />

357:251–256 (2001).<br />

27 Clements RS and Darnell B, Myo-inositol content of common foods:<br />

development of a high-myo-inositol diet. Am J Clin Nutr<br />

33:1954–1967 (1980).<br />

28 Wisselink HW, Weusthuisa RA, Eggink G, Hugenholtz J and<br />

Grobben GJ, Mannitol production by lactic acid bacteria: a review.<br />

Int Dairy J 12:151–161 (2002).<br />

29 Choi KS and Rhee HS, Characteristics of doenjang made from different<br />

material and ratio of koji. Korean J Food Cook Sci 10:39–44 (1994).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1926–1935 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1935


1936<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 8 October 2009 Revised: 23 April 2010 Accepted: 5 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 16 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4038<br />

Timing of the inhibitory effect of fruit on return<br />

bloom of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange (Citrus<br />

sinensis (L.) Osbeck)<br />

Amparo Martínez-Fuentes, Carlos Mesejo, Carmina Reig<br />

and Manuel Agustí ∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: In Citrus the inhibitory effect of fruit on flower formation is the main cause of alternate bearing. Although there<br />

are some studies reporting the effect on flowering of the time of fruit removal in a well-defined stage of fruit development, few<br />

have investigated the effect throughout the entire fruit growth stage from early fruitlet growth to fruit maturity. The objective<br />

of this study was to determine the phenological fruit developmental stage at which the fruit begins its inhibitory effect on<br />

flowering in sweet orange by manual removal of fruits, and the role of carbohydrates and nitrogen in the process.<br />

RESULTS: Fruit exerted its inhibitory effect from the time it was close to reaching its maximum weight, namely 90% of its final<br />

size (November) in the present experiments, to bud sprouting (April). The reduction in flowering paralleled the reduction in bud<br />

sprouting. This reduction was due to a decrease in the number of generative sprouted buds, whereas mixed-typed shoots were<br />

largely independent of the time of fruit removal, and vegetative shoots increased in frequency. The number of leaves and/or<br />

flowers per sprouted shoot was not significantly modified by fruit load.<br />

CONCLUSION: In ‘Valencia’ sweet orange, fruit inhibits flowering from the time it completes its growth. Neither soluble sugar<br />

content nor starch accumulation in leaves due to fruit removal was related to flowering intensity, but some kind of imbalance<br />

in nitrogen metabolism was observed in trees tending to flower scarcely.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: carbohydrates; Citrus; flowering; nitrogen fractions; sprouting<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The inhibitory effect of fruit on flower formation is the main<br />

cause of alternate bearing in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange, 1 an effect<br />

depending on the number of developed fruits and on the date of<br />

harvest.<br />

It has been suggested that fruit either reduces the sensitivity<br />

of buds to floral inductive conditions or else increases bud<br />

requirements to be induced to flower. 2 In either event, since<br />

the existence of endogenous flowering promoters has not yet<br />

been proven, it has been argued that, from the completion of<br />

juvenility, citrus buds are continually induced to flower, but their<br />

development is under the negative control of an inhibitor, 3,4<br />

which maintains the meristems in a vegetative condition. 5 The<br />

presence of endogenous root tissue-, seed- and fruit tissueproduced<br />

gibberellins regulates (negatively) flowering in Citrus,as<br />

proposed by Goldschmidt and Monselise. 3 The effect of gibberellic<br />

acid inhibiting flowering from late summer until the winter rest<br />

period 6–8 reinforces this hypothesis.<br />

Although there are some studies reporting the effect on<br />

flowering of the time of fruit removal by hand, 9,10 they are always<br />

restricted to a well-defined stage of fruit development, e.g. early<br />

fruit development stage (fruitlet drop) or maturation stage, and<br />

few have investigated the effect throughout the entire fruit growth<br />

stage, 11 i.e. from early fruitlet growth to fruit maturity.<br />

In this study we examine the effect of defruiting on both the<br />

carbohydrate concentration and the total and soluble nitrogen<br />

fraction (NH4 + -N, NO3 − -N and NO2 − -N) contents in leaves<br />

and their relationships with flowering intensity in ‘Valencia’<br />

sweet orange. It has been reported that control of flowering<br />

is mediated by carbohydrate content 12 and that the accumulation<br />

of leaf ammonia content caused by water-deficit stress or lowtemperature<br />

stress is an early stress-linked event influencing floral<br />

initiation in Citrus. 13 Further, a disturbance in the nitrate reduction<br />

mechanism was found in trees that tended to flower less, both in<br />

citrus 9 and in peach. 14<br />

The main aim of the present study was to determine the<br />

phenological fruit developmental stage at which the fruit begins<br />

its inhibitory effect on flowering in sweet orange by manual<br />

removal of fruits from fruitlet drop to late in the maturation stage<br />

up to harvest.<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Manuel Agustí, Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo,<br />

Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, E-46022 Valencia,<br />

Spain. E-mail: magusti@prv.upv.es<br />

Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia,<br />

Camino de Vera s/n, E-46022 Valencia, Spain<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Flowering and time of fruit remaining on tree in Citrus www.soci.org<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Plant material and treatments<br />

The study was conducted in a commercial orchard located in Lliria,<br />

Spain containing mature 20-year-old ‘Valencia’ sweet orange<br />

(Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck) trees grafted onto ‘Carrizo’ citrange<br />

(C. sinensis (L.) Osbeck × Poncirus trifoliate (L.) Raf.) rootstock,<br />

grown in a loamy-clay soil, planted 5 m × 6 m apart, with drip<br />

irrigation.<br />

In the late spring, trees similar in size, vigour and crop load<br />

were selected. Four branches per tree with similar size (4–6 cm<br />

base diameter) and similar number of developed fruits (50 ± 4<br />

fruits), located all around the tree at 1.5–2 m above soil level<br />

and totalling 2000 nodes, were labelled for flowering evaluation<br />

in the following spring. Branches were defruited by hand at<br />

phenological fruit growth stages 72, 74, 78, 79, 80, 81 and 89<br />

of the BBCH scale, 15 i.e. from the onset of physiological fruitlet<br />

abscission(BBCHstage72)tofruitmatureforconsumption/harvest<br />

date (BBCH stage 89). The original BBCH scale was developed<br />

by the Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft<br />

by considering numerical scales suitable for describing the<br />

development of different species. The Citrus BBCH scale consists<br />

of two-digit stages, e.g. 74, the first digit expressing the major<br />

stage, i.e. 7 refers to the development of fruit, and the second digit<br />

expressing the secondary stage within the course of the specific<br />

major stage, i.e. 4 refers to fruits about 40% of final size. 15<br />

Fruits from selected branches were counted and their diameters<br />

measured at the time of fruit removal.<br />

Sprouting and flowering evaluation<br />

Bud sprouting and flowering were measured in the spring.<br />

The shoots initiated were counted, and also their numbers of<br />

flowers and leaves, and classified according to Guardiola et al. 16<br />

Unsprouted nodes were also counted. From the number of flowers<br />

per shoot and the number of shoots developed per branch, the<br />

total number of flowers per branch could be calculated. The<br />

results are expressed in flowers per 100 nodes to compensate for<br />

the differences in size of the branches selected for counting. Only<br />

buds younger than 24 months of age were considered for the<br />

countings, since older buds hardly contribute to the spring flush.<br />

Carbohydrate analysis<br />

Approximately 20 leaves from spring terminal flushes of defruited<br />

branches at BBCH stage 72 and fruited branches (defruited at<br />

BBCH stage 89) were collected at BBCH stages 78 (during cell<br />

enlargement stage), 81 (colour break) and 89 (mature fruit).<br />

Samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, lyophilised<br />

and stored as powders at −28 ◦ C. The procedure for carbohydrate<br />

determination was as described previously by Mehouachi et al. 17<br />

In brief, 100 mg powdered samples were extracted with 1 mL of<br />

800 mL L −1 ethanol and purified sequentially using cation and<br />

anion exchange columns. The eluates were then passed through<br />

a C18 Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters-Millipore, Barcelona, Spain) and<br />

analysed in a Spectra HPLC System ® (Spectra, San Jose, CA, USA)<br />

equipped with a vacuum pump (Spectra P2000) and a differential<br />

refractometer (Spectra R150). Sucrose, glucose and fructose were<br />

identified according to their retention times.<br />

Starch levels were determined in the pellets that remained<br />

after the extraction of soluble sugars. The residue was incubated<br />

by shaking for 2 h at 55 ◦ C with 0.2 mL of 60 mg mL −1 fucose<br />

(internal standard), 0.5 mL of sodium acetate (pH 4.5) and 1 mL<br />

of 1218 U amyloglucosidase from Rhizopus (Sigma Chemical<br />

Co. Inc. Sigma-Aldrich Chemie Gmbh, Steinheim, Germany). The<br />

glucose released was determined by high-performance liquid<br />

chromatography (HPLC) as above. Results were expressed as g<br />

glucose released g −1 dry weight (DW).<br />

Nitrogen fraction analysis<br />

The same leaves sampled for carbohydrate analysis were used<br />

for total and soluble nitrogen fraction analysis. Proteinaceous<br />

nitrogen (N-Prot), ammonium nitrogen (NH4 + -N) and nitrate<br />

nitrogen (NO3 − -N) were determined according to Raigón et al. 18<br />

and Beljaars et al. 19 In brief, 500 mg powdered samples were<br />

homogenisedin10 mLof50 g L −1 trichloroaceticacid(TCA)at4 ◦ C,<br />

rinsed with 30 mL of cold 50 g L −1 TCA, filtered, rinsed three times<br />

with 10 mL of cold 50 g L −1 TCA, made up to 100 mL with Milli-Q<br />

water and injected into a FIAstar 5000 Analyser ® (Foss Tecator,<br />

Höganäs, Sweden) for NH4 + -N determination. Results were<br />

expressed as µgNH4 + -N g −1 DW. The residue, containing N-Prot,<br />

was then digested by the micro-Kjeldahl method and distilled in a<br />

Kjeltec 2200 Autodistillation ® apparatus (Foss, Höganäs, Sweden).<br />

Results were expressed as mg N-Prot g −1 DW. For the NO3 − -N<br />

fraction analysis, 500 mg powdered samples were homogenised<br />

in 50 mL of Milli-Q water, filtered and injected into the FIAstar 5000<br />

Analyser ® . Results were expressed as µgNO3 − -N g −1 DW.<br />

Statistical design<br />

The experiment was laid out in randomised blocks, with single-tree<br />

plots and ten replicates per date of fruit removal. Variance and<br />

regression analyses were performed on the data, and means were<br />

separated using Duncan’s new multiple range test.<br />

RESULTS<br />

In our experiments with ‘Valencia’ sweet orange, flowering<br />

depended on the time of fruit remaining on the tree (Fig. 1). Our<br />

results show two periods of fruit influence on flowering defined<br />

by the date of fruit removal: (1) from the onset of physiological<br />

fruitlet drop (June drop) (BBCH stage 72) to full fruit development<br />

(BBCH stage 78) and (2) from the date on which the fruit reached<br />

its final size (BBCH stage 79) to full maturity (BBCH stage 89),<br />

coinciding with the harvest date. For the first period the following<br />

spring flowering averaged 41.8 flowers per 100 nodes, while<br />

for the second period the following spring flowering averaged<br />

only 6.9 flowers per 100 nodes (Fig. 1). Flowering of branches<br />

that maintained all developed fruits up to final size was 90%<br />

lower on average than that of branches defruited during the fruit<br />

developmental stage. An additional but non-significant reduction<br />

in flowering intensity was found from the early stages of peel<br />

colouration (BBCH stage 81) up to full fruit ripeness (BBCH stage<br />

89). It is important to note that this latter developmental stage<br />

coincided with bud sprouting. The number of summer/autumn<br />

vegetative shoots was also significantly increased (P ≤ 0.05) by<br />

removing fruits at BBCH stages 72–78 (3.4 shoots per 100 nodes<br />

on average) compared with fruit removal at BBCH stages 79–89<br />

(0.49 shoots per 100 nodes on average).<br />

The reduction in flowering paralleled the reduction in bud<br />

sprouting (Fig. 2), and there was a significant relationship between<br />

the percentage of sprouted buds and the number of flowers per<br />

100 nodes (r = 0.976, P ≤ 0.01).<br />

Buds producing generative shoots were the most sensitive to<br />

inhibition by fruit. Comparing the two periods differing in bud<br />

sensitivity to fruit inhibition, the frequency of this type of shoot<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1937


1938<br />

Flowers / 100 nodes<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

a a<br />

a<br />

www.soci.org A Martínez-Fuentes et al.<br />

b b<br />

Flowers<br />

Fruit diameter<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May<br />

72 74 78 79 80 81 89<br />

BBCH-phenological fruit growth stage at fruit removal<br />

Figure 1. Time course of fruit growth and influence of time of fruit removal on flowering in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange. Each value is the average of ten trees.<br />

Standard errors are given as vertical bars. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). Phenological growth stages of the BBCH scale at the<br />

time of fruit removal are given.<br />

sprouting (%)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

a<br />

a<br />

a<br />

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr<br />

72 74 78 79 80 81 89<br />

BBCH-phenological fruit growth stage atfruit removal<br />

Figure 2. Influence of time of fruit removal on pattern of sprouting in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange. Each value is the average of ten trees. Standard errors<br />

are given as vertical bars. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). Phenological growth stages of the BBCH scale at the time of fruit<br />

removal are given.<br />

was reduced by 80% on average by maintaining the fruit from<br />

colour break onwards (Fig. 3). On the contrary, vegetative shoots<br />

increased by 60% in frequency. The proportion of mixed-typed<br />

shoots was largely independent of the time of fruit removal. In<br />

absolute values, multiflowered leafless shoots were reduced from<br />

7.8 to 1.2 shoots per 100 nodes on average when comparing the<br />

two periods of fruit removal, and single-flowered leafless shoots<br />

b<br />

b<br />

b<br />

bc<br />

b<br />

were reduced from 3.0 to 0.4 shoots per 100 nodes; leafy shoots<br />

were reduced only slightly by fruit load, multiflowered ones from<br />

1.2 to 0.8 shoots per 100 nodes and single-flowered ones from 0.5<br />

to 0.3 shoots per 100 nodes. Shoot characteristics, i.e. number of<br />

flowers and/or leaves per shoot, were not significantly modified<br />

by fruit removal, regardless of the shoot type and date of removal<br />

(data not shown).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943<br />

c<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Fruit diameter (mm)


Flowering and time of fruit remaining on tree in Citrus www.soci.org<br />

shoots /100 nodes<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

72<br />

Jun<br />

74<br />

Jul<br />

78<br />

Sep<br />

79<br />

Nov<br />

80<br />

Dec<br />

Mixed shoots<br />

Generative leaflessshoots<br />

Vegetative shoots<br />

81<br />

Jan<br />

BBCH-phenological fruit growth stage at fruit removal<br />

89 Apr<br />

Significance<br />

Mixed sh n.s.<br />

Gen.sh a a a b b b b<br />

Veg.sh. a a a b b ab ab<br />

Figure 3. Influence of time of fruit removal on pattern of shoot sprouting in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange. Results are expressed as the number of shoots per<br />

100 nodes. Each value is the average of ten trees. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). Phenological growth stages of the BBCH<br />

scale at the time of fruit removal are given.<br />

Significant differences in carbohydrate concentration in leaves<br />

due to fruit load were found, the intensity of the response<br />

depending on the date of analysis (Table 1). Thus, whereas<br />

glucose concentration was significantly lower in leaves from<br />

defruited branches both during fruit growth (BBCH stage 78)<br />

and at fruit colour break (BBCH stage 81) (Table 1), fructose<br />

concentration was significantly lower only at fruit colour break,<br />

and sucrose concentration only during fruit growth. Leaves of<br />

branches that maintained all their developed fruits up to maturity<br />

had the lowest starch content at fruit ripeness (BBCH stage<br />

89), which coincided with bud sprouting. Except for starch and<br />

for glucose in leaves of branches defruited at BBCH stage 72,<br />

all sugars showed higher concentrations at fruit colour break<br />

stage, regardless of the presence of fruit. For starch a higher<br />

concentration was found at bud sprouting, regardless of the date<br />

of fruit removal.<br />

NO3 − -N levels accumulated in leaves increased during fruit<br />

development, irrespective of fruit removal, but those accumulated<br />

in leaves of branches that maintained all fruits up to maturity<br />

differed significantly from those accumulated in leaves of defruited<br />

branches; the former remained almost constant for the two<br />

last dates of analysis, whereas the latter decreased from 68 to<br />

29 µgg −1 DW (Table 2). Thus, at fruit colour break (BBCH stage<br />

81), leaves of branches maintaining all fruits contained 27 µg<br />

NO3 − -N g −1 DW less than leaves of defruited branches, whereas<br />

at the mature fruit stage (BBCH stage 89), which coincided with<br />

bud sprouting in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange, they contained 17 µg<br />

NO3 − -N g −1 DW more than leaves of defruited branches. NH4 + -<br />

N content in leaves also increased during fruit development,<br />

irrespective of fruit removal, and the content in leaves of branches<br />

maintaining all fruits also remained constant during BBCH stages<br />

81–89 (28–29 µgg −1 DW); no significant differences due to<br />

fruit load were found during fruit growth (BBCH stage 78) and<br />

at fruit colour break (BBCH stage 81), but, at bud sprouting<br />

(coinciding with BBCH stage 89), NH4 + -N content in leaves of<br />

branches maintaining all fruits (29 µgg −1 DW) was significantly<br />

lower than that in leaves of defruited branches (36 µgg −1<br />

DW), differences becoming statistically significant. Interestingly,<br />

whereas, in defruited branches, leaf NO3 − -N content decreased<br />

significantly and leaf NH4 + -N content increased significantly from<br />

fruit colour break to mature fruit growth stage, no significant<br />

changes were found in leaves of branches that maintained all<br />

their developed fruits between these phenological fruit growth<br />

stages (Table 2). Non-significant differences in N-Prot levels due<br />

to fruit load were found (Table 2); nevertheless, at the mature<br />

fruit stage (BBCH stage 89), leaves from branches maintaining all<br />

fruits and from defruited branches were found to contain 11.6 and<br />

10.4 mg g −1 DW respectively. These levels were lower than those<br />

found at the colour break stage (BBCH stage 81).<br />

In our experiments the reduction in flowering paralleled a<br />

reduction in the number of fruits cropped per tree in the<br />

next season (data not shown). Further, a significant relationship<br />

(r = 0.937, P ≤ 0.01) was found between the number of flowers<br />

per 100 nodes and the number of fruits cropped per tree. However,<br />

this reduction in flowering intensity resulted in an increase in both<br />

fruit set and average fruit weight, which compensated for the<br />

reduced flowering; thus an average flowering inhibition of more<br />

than 75% due to fruit load (Fig. 1) gave rise to only a 50% reduction<br />

in the crop (data not shown).<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The effect of fruit inhibiting flowering has been shown in most<br />

polycarpic (perennial) fruit trees, both evergreen and deciduous<br />

species, such as apple and pear, 20 peach 14 and citrus, 1 but none of<br />

those studies reported the exact moment when the fruit initiates<br />

its inhibitory effect. Recently, Verreynne and Lovatt 11 provided<br />

evidence that removal of all fruit from ‘Pixie’ mandarin on-crop<br />

trees early in summer increased total flower number in spring by<br />

increasing summer/autumn shoot number.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1939


1940<br />

Table 1. Effect of fruit load on time course of glucose, fructose, sucrose and starch concentrations in leaves of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange. Dates of fruit removal and analyses are given as phenological<br />

growth stages of the BBCH scale. Each value is the average ± standard error of ten trees<br />

Glucose (mg g −1 DW) Fructose (mg g −1 DW) Sucrose (mg g −1 DW) Starch (mg glucose g −1 DW)<br />

www.soci.org A Martínez-Fuentes et al.<br />

BBCH stage 78 81 89 78 81 89 78 81 89 81 89<br />

72 4.7 ± 1.9a 8.5 ± 0.3b 8.1 ± 0.2b 5.2 ± 0.9a 8.4 ± 0.3b 6.3 ± 0.1a 3.8 ± 0.9a 26.1 ± 1.9c 12.1 ± 0.1b 76.3 ± 3.1a 152.5 ± 3.6b<br />

89 7.4 ± 0.8a 10.0 ± 0.5b 8.0 ± 0.4a 5.3 ± 0.4a 10.8 ± 0.3b 6.6 ± 0.1a 13.7 ± 1.4a 26.9 ± 1.1b 11.5 ± 0.7a 72.2 ± 8.3a 138.1 ± 0.5b<br />

∗ ∗ NS NS ∗ NS ∗ NS NS NS ∗<br />

Fa P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001 P = 0.2267<br />

Db P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001<br />

F × Dc P = 0.0006 P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001 P = 0.3071<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943<br />

∗ Significant at P ≤ 0.01; NS, not significant.<br />

a Fruit removal effect.<br />

b Date effect. Different letters in the same row for a given sugar indicate significant differences.<br />

c Fruit removal × date effect.


Flowering and time of fruit remaining on tree in Citrus www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Effect of fruit load on nitrate nitrogen (NO3 − -N), ammonium nitrogen (NH4 + -N) and proteinaceous nitrogen (N-Prot) contents at fruit<br />

colour break and at fruit full maturity in leaves of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange. Dates of fruit removal and analyses are given as phenological growth stages<br />

of the BBCH scale. BBCH stage 89 coincided with bud sprouting in spring<br />

NO3 − -N (µgg −1 DW) NH4 + -N (µgg −1 DW) N-Prot (mg g −1 DW)<br />

BBCH stage 78 81 89 78 81 89 78 81 89<br />

72 36.0 ± 1.0b 68.0 ± 1.0c 29.0 ± 1.0a 52.1 ± 1.2c 24.0 ± 1.0a 36.0 ± 1.0b 15.7 ± 0.1b 14.5 ± 0.8b 10.4 ± 0.2a<br />

89 17.0 ± 4.9a 41.0 ± 1.0b 46.0 ± 1.0b 51.3 ± 1.4b 28.0 ± 1.0a 29.0 ± 1.0a 18.1 ± 0.4b 16.1 ± 0.2b 11.6 ± 0.1a<br />

∗ ∗ ∗ NS NS NS NS NS NS<br />

F a P ≤ 0.05 NS P ≤ 0.05<br />

D b P ≤ 0.05 P ≤ 0.05 P ≤ 0.01<br />

F × D c P ≤ 0.05 NS NS<br />

∗ Significant at P ≤ 0.05; NS, not significant.<br />

a Fruit removal effect.<br />

b Date effect. Different letters in the same row for a given nitrogen fraction indicate significant differences.<br />

c Fruit removal × date effect.<br />

In ‘Valencia’ sweet orange we found that removal of all fruit<br />

from individual branches on on-crop trees during BBCH stages<br />

72–78 resulted in eightfold more flowers in spring compared<br />

with non-defruited branches on the same tree. Accordingly, the<br />

fruit exerts its inhibitory effect on flowering from the time it is<br />

close to reaching its maximum weight, namely 90% of its final<br />

size (November) in our experiments, similarly to ‘Marsh’ grapefruit<br />

under tropical conditions. 21 Fruit had no effect on flowering from<br />

BBCH stage 72 (43 flowers per 100 nodes) to BBCH stage 78, but,<br />

at BBCH stage 79 (November), flowering was reduced by 80% (8.6<br />

flowers per 100 nodes). This particular time coincides with that of<br />

bud sensitiveness to gibberellic acid (GA3) inhibiting flowering. 22<br />

Later on, during fruit maturation, i.e. from the moment when<br />

the fruit has reached its maximum size onwards, no additional<br />

reduction in flowering was observed up to bud sprouting. García-<br />

Luis et al. 10 suggested, for ‘Owari’ Satsuma mandarin, that the<br />

inhibitory effect of the fruit on flowering is more closely related to<br />

peel maturity than to fruit growth, but their study was carried out<br />

only during the fruit maturation stage. In our experiments with<br />

‘Valencia’ sweet orange the fruit changed colour 45 days after it<br />

attained its maximum size (BBCH stages 81 and 80 respectively)<br />

(Fig. 1). On the other hand, ‘Owari’ Satsuma mandarin matures<br />

earlier than ‘Valencia’ sweet orange and its sensitivity to inhibition<br />

of flowering by exogenous GA3 takes place 1 month later than<br />

it does for sweet orange. 7 These reasons explain the differences<br />

between species.<br />

Soluble sugar contents in leaves were altered by removing<br />

the fruit. In defruited branches, carbohydrates were reduced<br />

immediately in the leaves, since the main carbohydrate sink had<br />

been removed; thereafter there was an increase both in leaves<br />

of branches maintaining all developed fruits and in leaves of<br />

defruited branches, just as García-Luis and Guardiola 23 reported,<br />

followed by a late reduction at the time of fruit maturation, as<br />

was shown for peach. 14 However, at the time of bud sprouting,<br />

non-significant differences in leaf soluble sugar contents due to<br />

crop load were observed, indicating that flowering is unrelated to<br />

carbohydrate contents in leaves, as shown in other citrus species<br />

andcultivars 24,25 andinpeach. 14 Theaccumulationofstarchduring<br />

the winter has been observed by several authors 26 and quantified<br />

by Yelenosky and Guy, 27 who related this accumulation to low<br />

temperatures. The significantly lower starch content in leaves<br />

of branches maintaining all developed fruits seemingly provides<br />

a good reason to correlate starch levels with flowering; however,<br />

differences appear only when fruit load scarcely inhibits flowering.<br />

Moreover, although a minimal amount of carbohydrates is<br />

required for bud sprouting and flower initiation, data from several<br />

studies suggest that, when separate experiments (shading,<br />

girdling, thinning, etc.) are compared, the occurrence of other<br />

controlling factors may obscure the existence of this correlation,<br />

indicating that the flowering–starch relationship remains<br />

unproved. 23,24,28 Similarly, no differences in starch content in the<br />

bark tissue from leaf abscission to bud bursting were observed<br />

in peach trees differing significantly in flowering intensity owing<br />

to crop load. 14 Accordingly, neither soluble sugar content nor<br />

the accumulation of reserve carbohydrates seems to fulfil an inductive<br />

function, but our results show evidence that sprouting<br />

and/or flower formation may require a threshold level of carbohydrates<br />

as an energy source, as reported by Goldschmidt et al. 28<br />

and indicated by the reduction in sucrose, glucose and fructose<br />

concentrations from colour break (BBCH stage 81) to full maturity<br />

and sprouting (BBCH stage 89), regardless of crop load.<br />

In Citrus, certain forms of stress, such as low-temperature stress<br />

and water-deficit stress, result in the accumulation of ammonia<br />

in leaves, and it has been questioned whether this compound is<br />

involved in flowering control. 13 On the other hand, an imbalance<br />

in nitrogen metabolism has been detected in leaves of on-trees<br />

of ‘Wilking’ mandarin compared with off-trees 9 and in phloem<br />

sap of peach trees that kept all fruits up to senescence compared<br />

with trees fully thinned at bloom. 14 This imbalance consists of an<br />

oppositetrendoftotalandNO3 − -N,sothattheoff-/on-treeratiofor<br />

NO3 − -N in leaves, twigs and roots is much less than one. Our results<br />

agree with this disturbance in the nitrate reduction mechanism,<br />

since no reduction in leaf NO3 − -Ncontentwas observed during the<br />

fruit maturation stage in branches maintaining all fruits up to bud<br />

sprouting, whereas branches defruited at BBCH stage 72 showed<br />

significantly reduced leaf NO3 − -N content at bud sprouting (BBCH<br />

stage 89) compared with fruit colour break (BBCH stage 81). The<br />

increased NH4 + -N fraction in these branches reinforces this result.<br />

Accordingly, in Citrus the nitrate-reducing mechanism in leaves<br />

is impaired by the fruit load. Despite this, as NO3 − -N is only a<br />

small fraction of the total nitrogen, ranging from 0.4 to 0.6% (w/w)<br />

(Table 2), this relatively high nitrate amount in leaves of early<br />

defruited trees conveys a metabolic message rather than one of<br />

direct nutritional meaning. 9<br />

Fruit maintained on the tree up to BBCH stage 79 or later<br />

significantly reduced the number of summer/autumn vegetative<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1941


1942<br />

shoots that developed, thus reducing the number of branches on<br />

which to bear inflorescences the following spring, as has been<br />

shown in ‘Pixie’ 11 and ‘Nour’ 29 mandarin. Further, fruit removal<br />

also affects the number of nodes on these shoots, which in turn<br />

affects the number of flowers produced during spring bloom. 11,30<br />

The reduction in flowering brought about by fruit load is also<br />

due in part to a decrease in the number of sprouted nodes. This<br />

effectcoincides with thatreported for ‘Owari’ Satsuma mandarin. 10<br />

In that study, as well as in our study with ‘Valencia’ sweet orange,<br />

buds producing generative buds were the most sensitive to fruit<br />

load, whereas vegetative shoots were significantly increased by<br />

leaving the fruit on the tree up to the moment of its maximum<br />

size. Similarly, Okuda et al. 31,32 reported that, during spring bloom<br />

of Satsuma mandarin trees, fruit-bearing trees had a lower<br />

number of leafless and leafy floral shoots but a higher number<br />

of vegetative shoots compared with non-bearing trees. Further,<br />

scoring performed in summer increased flowering of ‘Salustiana’<br />

sweet orange and ‘Owari’ Satsuma mandarin by stimulating bud<br />

sprouting in spring. 33<br />

It is noteworthy that shoot characteristics, i.e. number of flowers<br />

and/or leaves, were not altered by the date of fruit removal. These<br />

results indicate a direct effect of fruit upon the bud, which is<br />

prevented from sprouting. Only buds that elude the effect of fruit<br />

are able to sprout and develop into flowers, 5 thus maintaining the<br />

average number of flowers and leaves. Therefore it seems that fruit<br />

does not affect the number of flowers per sprouted bud but rather<br />

the number of buds that eventually sprout. These results reinforce<br />

the hypothesis thatall buds of adulttrees are induced to flower, but<br />

their development is under the control of an inhibitor and, when<br />

the inhibitor acts, the bud does not sprout or reverses its capacity<br />

to flower and sprouts as a vegetative bud. 4,34 In Citrus, terminal<br />

buds flower mainly on the outside of the canopy, 35 whereas buds<br />

inside the canopy scarcely sprout, but, when trees are cut back,<br />

some of them start flushing and appear as flowers, indicating that<br />

they had undergone floral induction but were kept dormant. 36<br />

In conclusion, in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange, fruit inhibits flowering<br />

from the time it reaches its maximum weight by reducing the<br />

number of nodes to sprout and the number of sprouted nodes, but<br />

it does not affect the number of leaves and/or flowers per sprouted<br />

shoot. Neither soluble sugar content nor starch accumulation in<br />

leaves caused by fruit removal was related to flowering intensity,<br />

but some kind of imbalance in nitrogen metabolism was observed<br />

in trees tending to flower scarcely.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors wish to thank Luisa Moneva for her technical<br />

assistance, Agrimarba, SA for its collaboration and Debra Westall<br />

for editing the manuscript.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Monselise SP and Goldschmidt EE, Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Hort<br />

Rev 4:128–173 (1982).<br />

2 AlbrigoGandGalán V, Flower bud induction, flowering and fruit-set of<br />

some tropical and subtropical fruit tree crops with special reference<br />

to Citrus. Acta Hort 632:81–90 (2004).<br />

3 Goldschmidt EE and Monselise SP, Hormonal control of flowering in<br />

citrus trees and other woody perennials, in Plant Growth Substances,<br />

ed. by Carr DJ. Springer, Berlin, pp. 758–766 (1972).<br />

4 Martínez-Fuentes A, Mesejo C, Juan M, Almela V and AgustíM,<br />

Restrictions on the exogenous control of flowering in Citrus. Acta<br />

Hort 632:91–98 (2004).<br />

www.soci.org A Martínez-Fuentes et al.<br />

5 Lang A, Physiology of flower initiation, in Handbunch der<br />

Pflanzenphysiologie, Vol. XV/1, ed. by Ruhland W. Springer, Berlin,<br />

pp. 1380–1586 (1965).<br />

6 Monselise SP and Halevy AH, Chemical inhibition and promotion of<br />

citrus flower bud induction. JAmSocHortSci84:141–146 (1964).<br />

7 Guardiola JL, Monerri C and Agustí M, The inhibitory effect of<br />

gibberellic acid on flowering in Citrus. Physiol Plant 55:136–142<br />

(1982).<br />

8 Lord EM and Eckard MJ, Shoot development in Citrus sinensis<br />

(L.) Osbeck, cv. ‘Washington’ navel. II. Alteration of development<br />

rate of flowering shoots after GA3 treatment. Bot Gaz 148:17–22<br />

(1987).<br />

9 Monselise SP, Goldschmidt EE and Golomb A, Alternate bearing in<br />

citrus and ways of control. Proc Int Soc Citricult 1:239–242 (1981).<br />

10 García-Luís A, Almela V, Monerri C, Agusti M and Guardiola JL,<br />

Inhibition of flowering in vivo by existing fruits and applied growth<br />

regulators in Citrus unshiu. Physiol Plant 66:515–520 (1986).<br />

11 Verreynne JS and Lovatt CJ, The effect of crop load on budbreak<br />

influences return bloom in alternate bearing ‘Pixie’ mandarin. JAm<br />

Soc Hort Sci 134:299–307 (2009).<br />

12 Goldschmidt EEandGolomb A,Thecarbohydratebalanceofalternatebearing<br />

Citrus trees and the significance of reserves for flowering<br />

and fruiting. JAmSocHortSci107:206–208 (1982).<br />

13 Lovatt CJ, Zheng Y and Hake KD, Demonstration of a change in<br />

nitrogen metabolism influencing flower initiation in Citrus. Isr J Bot<br />

37:181–188 (1988).<br />

14 Reig C, González-Rossia D, Juan M and Agustí M, Effects of fruit load<br />

on flower bud initiation and development in peach. J Hort Sci<br />

Biotechnol 81:1079–1085 (2006).<br />

15 Agustí M, Zaragoza S, Bleiholder H, Buhr L, Hack H, Klose R, et al,<br />

Adaptation of the BBCH scale for the description of Citrus fruits’<br />

phenological stages. Fruits 52:287–295 (1997).<br />

16 Guardiola JL, Agustí M and García-Mari F, Gibberellic acid and flower<br />

bud development in sweet orange. Proc Int Soc Citricult 2:696–699<br />

(1977).<br />

17 Mehouachi J, Serna D, Zaragoza S, Agustí M, Talon M and Primo-<br />

Millo E, Defoliation increases fruit abscission and reduces<br />

carbohydrate levels in developing fruits and woody tissues of<br />

Citrus unshiu. Plant Sci 107:189–197 (1995).<br />

18 Raigón MD, Pérez-García M, Maquieira A and Puchades R, Determination<br />

of available nitrogen (nitric and ammoniacal) in soils<br />

by flow injection analysis. Analysis 20:483–487 (1992).<br />

19 Beljaars PR,Van Dijk Rand Van Der Horst GMJ,Determination of nitrate<br />

in vegetables by continuous flow: interlaboratory study. JAOACInt<br />

77:1522–1529 (1994).<br />

20 Jonkers H, Biennial bearing in apple and pear: a literature survey. Sci<br />

Hort 11:303–317 (1979).<br />

21 Betancourt M, Martinez-Fuentes A, Garcia ME, Mesejo C, Sanchez CD,<br />

Nuñez M, et al, The influence of fruit load on flowering intensity of<br />

grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) under tropical climatic conditions.<br />

Proc Int Soc Citricult Abstract:203 (2008).<br />

22 El-Otmani M, Coggins CHW, Agusti M and Lovatt CG, Plant growth<br />

regulators in citriculture. World current uses. Crit Rev Plant Sci<br />

19:395–447 (2000).<br />

23 García-Luis A and Guardiola JL, Influence of citrus internal factors and<br />

climatic effects on flowering. Proc Int Soc Citricult 1:292–295 (2000).<br />

24 García-Luís A, Fornes F, Sanz A and Guardiola JL, The regulation of<br />

flowering and fruit set in Citrus: relationship with carbohydrate<br />

levels. Isr J Bot 37:189–201 (1988).<br />

25 Lovatt CJ, Zheng Y and Hake KD, A new look at the Kraus–Kraybill<br />

hypothesis and flowering in Citrus. Proc. 6th Int. Citrus Congr.,Vol.1,<br />

pp. 475–483 (1988).<br />

26 Davenport L, Citrus flowering. Hort Rev 12:349–408 (1990).<br />

27 Yelenosky G and Guy CI, Carbohydrate accumulation in leaves and<br />

stems of ‘Valencia’ orange at progressively colder temperatures.<br />

Bot Gaz 138:13–17 (1977).<br />

28 Goldschmidt EE, Aschkenazi N, Herzano Y, Schaffer AA and<br />

Monselise SP, A role for carbohydrate levels in the control of<br />

flowering in Citrus. Sci Hort 26:159–166 (1985).<br />

29 El-Otmani M, Goumari M, Srairi I, Lbrek A, Charif L and Lovatt CJ, Heavy<br />

fruit load and late harvest inhibit flowering of the ‘Nour’ Clementine<br />

mandarin. Proc Int Soc Citricult 2:525–527 (2004).<br />

30 Agustí M, Biología y control de la floración en el género Citrus. PhD<br />

Thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (1980).<br />

31 Okuda H, Noda K, Kihara T and Hirabayashi T, Fine root volume,<br />

flowering, sprouting and carbohydrate content in the leaves and<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943


Flowering and time of fruit remaining on tree in Citrus www.soci.org<br />

roots of bearing and non-bearing Satsuma mandarin trees in a<br />

systemized alternate-bearing orchard. JJpnSocHortSci71:588–590<br />

(2002).<br />

32 OkudaH,KiharaT,NodaKandHirabayashiT,Systemizedalternate<br />

bearing method for mature Satsuma mandarin trees. Bull Natl Inst<br />

Fruit Tree Sci 1:61–69 (2002).<br />

33 Agustí M, Almela V and Pons J, Effects of girdling on alternate bearing<br />

in Citrus. JHortSci67:203–210 (1992).<br />

34 Goldschmidt EE and Samach A, Aspects of flowering in fruit trees. Acta<br />

Hort 653:23–27 (2004).<br />

35 Valiente JL and Albrigo LG, Flower bud induction of sweet orange<br />

trees (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck): effect of low temperatures, crop<br />

load and bud age. JAmSocHortSci129:158–164 (2004).<br />

36 Bangerth KF, Floral induction in mature, perennial angiosperm fruit<br />

trees: similarities and discrepancies with annual/biennial plants<br />

and the involvement of plant hormones. Sci Hort 122:153–163<br />

(2009).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1936–1943 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1943


1944<br />

<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 8 March 2010 Revised: 11 May 2010 Accepted: 17 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 16 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4039<br />

Improvement of L(+)-lactic acid production<br />

from cassava wastewater by Lactobacillus<br />

rhamnosus B 103<br />

Luciana Fontes Coelho, a Cristian J Bolner de Lima, a<br />

Marcela Piassi Bernardo, a Georgina Michelena Alvarez b<br />

and Jonas Contiero a∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: L(+)-Lactic acid is used in the pharmaceutical, textile and food industries as well as in the synthesis of<br />

biodegradable plastics. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different medium components added in cassava<br />

wastewater for the production of L(+)-lactic acid by Lactobacillus rhamnosus B 103.<br />

RESULTS: The use of cassava wastewater (50 g L −1 of reducing sugar) with Tween 80 and corn steep liquor, at concentrations<br />

(v/v) of 1.27 mL L −1 and 65.4 mL L −1 respectively led to a lactic acid concentration of 41.65 g L −1 after 48 h of fermentation. The<br />

maximum lactic acid concentration produced in the reactor after 36 h of fermentation was 39.00 g L −1 using the same medium,<br />

but the pH was controlled by addition of 10 mol L −1 NaOH.<br />

CONCLUSION: The use of cassava wastewater for cultivation of L. rhamnosus is feasible, with a considerable production of<br />

lactic acid. Furthermore, it is an innovative proposal, as no references were found in the scientific literature on the use of this<br />

substrate for lactic acid production.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: cassava wastewater; corn steep liquor; response surface methodology<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Lactic acid has a wide range of applications in the pharmaceutical,<br />

food, leather, textile and cosmetic industries. 1 One of the<br />

most important applications of lactic acid is in biodegradable<br />

markets, such as polylactic acid, which can be used to improve<br />

physical properties in the production of garbage bags, agricultural<br />

plastic sheeting and computer parts. 2 It can also be applied in<br />

sutures and surgical implants owing to its biocompatible and<br />

bioabsorbable characteristics. 3 L(+)-Lactic acid with high optical<br />

purity provides polylactic acid with a high melting point and high<br />

crystallinity. 4,5 Lactic acid is industrially produced either through<br />

chemical synthesis or microbial fermentation. The advantage of<br />

the fermentation method resides in the fact that an optically pure<br />

lactic acid can be obtained by choosing a strain of lactic acid<br />

bacteria, whereas chemical synthesis always results in a mixture of<br />

L(+)- and D(−)-lactic acid. 6<br />

Refined sugars such as glucose or sucrose have been more<br />

frequently used as the carbon source and yeast extract as a<br />

nitrogen source for lactic acid production, but this is economically<br />

unfavorable.<br />

In order to lower the cost of the production process, a number<br />

of agro-industrial by-products or wastes have been evaluated as<br />

substrates for the production of lactic acid, such as sugarcane, 7<br />

molasses 8 and whey 9 as carbon sources and corn steep liquor<br />

(CSL), 10 a by-product of the corn wet milling industry, as a nitrogen<br />

source.<br />

Lactic acid bacteria have complex nutrient requirements due to<br />

their limited ability to biosynthesize B vitamins and amino acids. 11<br />

Therefore CSL is an excellent source of nitrogen for lactic acid<br />

bacteria because it has a high concentration of amino acids and<br />

polypeptides,withconsiderableamountsofB-complexvitamins. 12<br />

Cassava wastewater (CW) is a residue, generated in large<br />

amounts during the production of cassava flour, composed<br />

of carbohydrates, nitrogen, minerals, and trace elements, and<br />

therefore has potential as a substrate for biotechnological<br />

processes. 13<br />

Cassava wastewater has been used to produce a surfactin by<br />

Bacillussubtilis, 14 citricacidbyAspergillusniger, 15 Polyhydroxyalkanoates<br />

(PHAs) and rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 16<br />

Some studies in the literature report the use of cassava bagasse<br />

in the production of lactic acid, 17–21 but no papers were found<br />

on lactic acid production using cassava wastewater as a substrate.<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Jonas Contiero, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology,<br />

Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.<br />

E-mail: jconti@rc.unesp.br<br />

a UNESP – Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Biological Sciences<br />

Institute, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil<br />

b Instituto Cubano de Investigaciones de los Derivados de la Caña de Azúcar,<br />

(ICIDCA), 488243 Havana, Cuba<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry


Improvement of L(+)-lactic acid production from cassava wastewater www.soci.org<br />

Therefore, the use of CW for lactic acid production is an innovative<br />

proposal.<br />

Lactobacillus rhamnosus B 103 has an advantage over other<br />

lactic acid bacteria such as homofermentative metabolism, highest<br />

productivity and production of L(+)-lactic acid that is optically<br />

pure. Therefore the aim of the present study was to investigate the<br />

effects of different medium components on cassava wastewater<br />

for the production of L(+)-lactic acid by Lactobacillus rhamnosus<br />

B 103.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Microorganism<br />

Lactobacillus rhamnosus B 103 was obtained from the Instituto<br />

Cubano de Investigaciones de los Derivados de la Caña de Azúgar<br />

(ICIDCA). The strain was stored in Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS)<br />

medium with 20% (v/v) glycerol at −20 ◦ C.<br />

Substrates<br />

CSL was obtained from Corn Products Co. (São Paulo state, Brazil)<br />

and CW was collected from cassava flour manufacturer Plaza SA<br />

(São Paulo state, Brazil) and stored at −20 ◦ C until needed. Solids<br />

as well as cyanide were removed from the CW by boiling for 5 min,<br />

followed by cooling and centrifugation at 5000 × g for 10 min. 14,22<br />

The supernatant was used as a production medium.<br />

The same CW was used for all experiments. CW composition:<br />

fructose (24.5 g L −1 ), glucose (30.1 g L −1 ), maltose<br />

(1.8 g L −1 ), nitrate (0.7 g L −1 ), phosphorus (0.9 g L −1 ), potassium<br />

(3.9 g L −1 ), magnesium (0.5 g L −1 ), nitrite (0.05 mg L −1 ), sodium<br />

(23.1 mg L −1 ), iron (6.1 mg L −1 ), zinc (11.1 mg L −1 ), manganese<br />

(4.1 mg L −1 ), copper (14.1 mg L −1 )andprotein(9gL −1 ). The composition<br />

of the CW was determined using the methodology<br />

described by Nitschke and Pastore. 14<br />

Cultivation<br />

The inocula were prepared through the transference of 1 mL of<br />

stock culture to Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of growth<br />

medium(MRS).MRSgrowthmediumcomposition(g L −1 ):peptone<br />

(10.0), yeastextract(5.0), meatextract(10.0), glucose (20.0), sodium<br />

acetate (5.0), ammonium citrate (2.0), K2HPO4 (5.0), MgSO4.7H2O<br />

Table 1. Plackett–Burman design (real and coded values) with respective resulting lactic acid production<br />

(0.1) and MnSO4.4H2O (0.05). Initial pH of the medium was<br />

adjusted to 6.2. The inocula were incubated at 37 ◦ C, 200 rpm<br />

for 18 h. 10% (v/v) of inoculum was added in all experiments.<br />

Calcium carbonate (50 g L −1 ) was added to experimental medium<br />

(Plackett–Burman experimental design and central composite<br />

design), the pH was adjusted to 6.2 with 2 mol L −1 NaOH. After<br />

that, 45 mL of experimental medium was transferred to a 250 mL<br />

Erlenmeyer flask and incubated in orbital shakers at 37 ◦ C, 200 rpm<br />

for 48 h. In all experiments, the concentration of initial reducing<br />

sugar was 50 g L −1 .<br />

Plackett–Burman experimental design<br />

The purpose of this first step of the optimization was to identify<br />

the medium components with a significant effect on lactic acid<br />

production. Twelve experiments were generated from seven<br />

factors: CSL, sodium acetate, magnesium sulfate, manganese<br />

sulfate, ammonium citrate, potassium phosphate and Tween<br />

80. Variables with a confidence level greater than 95% were<br />

consideredtohaveasignificantinfluenceonlacticacidproduction.<br />

The Plackett–Burman experimental design was based on the<br />

first-order model, with no interaction among the factors. The<br />

concentrations used for each variable are displayed in Table 1.<br />

A central composite design (CCD) was performed with the<br />

variables that significantly increased the production of lactic acid.<br />

CCD and optimization by response surface methodology<br />

A CCD for two independent variables – each at five levels with<br />

four star points (α = 1.41) and four replicates at the center<br />

points – was used to develop a second-order polynomial model,<br />

which determined the optimal values of variables for lactic acid<br />

production. Screened through previous work, CSL and Tween 80<br />

were taken as the variables for investigation.<br />

The variables of the experiments were coded according to the<br />

following equation:<br />

xi = (Xi − Xcp)/Xi i = 1, 2, ..., K (1)<br />

in which xi is the coded value of an independent variable; Xi is<br />

the real value of an independent variable; Xcp is the real value of<br />

Independent variables a Result<br />

Run X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 Lactic acid (g L −1 )<br />

1 2(1) b 0(−1) 2 (1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 30 (1) 29.53<br />

2 2 (1) 5 (1) 0 (−1) 0.2 (1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 19.685<br />

3 0(−1) 5 (1) 2 (1) 0 (−1) 0.05 (1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 16.215<br />

4 2(1) 0(−1) 2 (1) 0.2 (1) 0 (−1) 1 (1) 0 (−1) 22.795<br />

5 2 (1) 5 (1) 0 (−1) 0.2 (1) 0.05 (1) 0 (−1) 30 (1) 34.05<br />

6 2 (1) 5 (1) 2 (1) 0 (−1) 0.05 (1) 1 (1) 0 (−1) 19.07<br />

7 0(−1) 5 (1) 2 (1) 0.2 (1) 0 (−1) 1 (1) 30 (1) 30.66<br />

8 0(−1) 0 (−1) 2 (1) 0.2 (1) 0.05 (1) 0 (−1) 30 (1) 29.945<br />

9 0(−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0.2 (1) 0.05 (1) 1 (1) 0 (−1) 28.1<br />

10 2 (1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0.05 (1) 1 (1) 30 (1) 39.54<br />

11 0 (−1) 5 (1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 1 (1) 30 (1) 34.38<br />

12 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 0 (−1) 16.585<br />

a X1,citrate;X2, acetate; X3,K2HPO4; X4,MgSO4; X5,MnSO4; X6, Tween 80; X7,CSL.<br />

b (−1) and (1) are coded levels.<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1945


1946<br />

Table 2. Central composite design for optimization of two variables<br />

(each at five levels) and production of lactic acid<br />

Independent variables (mL L −1 ) Results(gL −1 )<br />

Run CSL (X1) Tween 80 (X2) Lacticacid<br />

1 20(−1) a 0.4 (−1) 33.42<br />

2 20(−1) 1.6 (1) 36.21<br />

3 60 (1) 0.4 (−1) 36.41<br />

4 60 (1) 1.6 (1) 41.82<br />

5 11.8 (−1.41) 1 (0) 31.71<br />

6 68.2 (1.41) 1 (0) 41.61<br />

7 40 (0) 0.154 (−1.41) 35.61<br />

8 40 (0) 1.846 (1.41) 38.52<br />

9 40 (0) 1 (0) 38.48<br />

10 40 (0) 1 (0) 38.90<br />

11 40 (0) 1(0) 38.79<br />

12 40 (0) 1 (0) 38.60<br />

a (−1.41), (−1), (0), (1) and (1.41) are coded levels.<br />

an independent variable at the center point; and �Xi is the step<br />

change value.<br />

The behavior of the system is explained by the following<br />

quadratic equation:<br />

Y = b0 + � bixi + � biixi 2 + � bijxixj<br />

in which Y is the predicted response, i.e. lactic acid concentration;<br />

b0 is the offset term; bi is the linear effect; bii is the squared effect;<br />

bij is the interaction effect; and xi is the independent variable.<br />

The Statistica 7.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) software package<br />

was used for the experimental design and regression analysis of<br />

the experimental data. The response surface was generated to<br />

understand the interactions among the variables. The optimal<br />

points for the variables were obtained from Maple 9.5 (Waterloo<br />

Maple Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada).<br />

Using the CCD method, a total of 12 experiments with various<br />

combinations of CSL and Tween 80 were conducted. Table 2<br />

displays the range and levels of the variables investigated.<br />

In order to validate the optimization of the medium composition,<br />

tests were carried out using the optimized condition in order<br />

to confirm the results of the response surface analysis.<br />

Scale-up fermentation of lactic acid with the optimized<br />

medium<br />

A scale-up fermentation of lactic acid with the optimized medium<br />

was then carried out in a 1.5 L glass vase bioreactor, with an<br />

initial culture volume of 500 mL. Agitation speed and culture<br />

temperature were controlled at 200 rpm and 37 ◦ C, respectively.<br />

The pH was controlled at 6.2 by the automatic addition of<br />

10 mol L −1 NaOH. Samples of 1 mL were withdrawn from the<br />

fermentation broth every 3 h for 48 h and centrifuged at 7800 × g<br />

for 10 min.<br />

Analysis<br />

Lactic acid concentrations were determined using a highperformance<br />

liquid chromatography system equipped with a UV<br />

detector at 210 nm. A Rezex ROA (300 × 7.8 mm, Phenomenex,<br />

Torrance, CA, USA) column was eluted with 5 mmol L −1 H2SO4<br />

www.soci.org LF Coelho et al.<br />

(2)<br />

as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min −1 and the<br />

column temperature was maintained at 60 ◦ C. Reducing sugars<br />

were measured using the 3.5-dinitrosalicylic acid method. 23 Cell<br />

growth was determined using a spectrophotometer at 650 nm<br />

(OD650) after centrifugation and washing of cells. The dry mass<br />

was determined through a standard curve of optical density versus<br />

dry mass.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Plackett–Burman experimental design<br />

Table 1 displays the Plackett–Burman design matrix (real and<br />

coded values) in 12 experiments with seven variables added to<br />

CW (X1 = citrate, X2 = acetate, X3 = K2HPO4, X4 = MgSO4,<br />

X5 = MnSO4, X6 = Tween 80, X7 = CSL) and respective lactic acid<br />

production.<br />

Figure 1 (Pareto chart) illustrates the effects of the different<br />

variables. CSL was the most influential variable in the production of<br />

lactic acid, followed by Tween 80 and K2HPO4. Only CSL and Tween<br />

80 had a significant positive effect on lactic acid production, with a<br />

95% confidence level, and were therefore used in the optimization<br />

of lactic acid production.<br />

Although Büyükkileci and Harsa 24 reportthatMnSO4 is essential<br />

for L.casei to produce lactic acid because of Mn 2+ , which stimulates<br />

lactate dehydrogenase activity, 25,26 MnSO4 did not significantly<br />

increase the production of lactic acid in the present study. Using<br />

the Plackett–Burman design to study solid-state fermentation<br />

by Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6, Naveena et al. 27 report that<br />

MnSO4.H2O had negative coefficients; MgSO4, sodium acetate<br />

and CSL were found to be insignificant; and ammonium citrate<br />

and Tween 80 improved the production of lactic acid.<br />

According to Honorato et al., 28 the addition of phosphate to the<br />

culture medium increases microorganism growth and enhances<br />

lactic acid production; in this case the component maintains<br />

the pH near the optimal growth value, thereby allowing the<br />

conduction of fermentation for a longer time. In the present<br />

study, however, K2HPO4 had a negative effect on lactic acid<br />

production. This may be explained by the excessive amount of this<br />

componentinthemedium.CWisrichinmanganese(4.1mgL −1 ),<br />

potassium (3.9 g L −1 ) and phosphorus (0.9 g L −1 ), which fulfills the<br />

requirements of the organism. In shake flask fermentation the<br />

pH was maintained by CaCO3 added to the medium. Thus the<br />

addition of K2HPO4 and MnSO4 in CW is not necessary and should<br />

be avoided.<br />

Response surface method<br />

CSL and Tween 80 were further optimized by using the response<br />

surface method. Table 2 displays the design matrix of the variables<br />

in coded units and real values with the respective results. The<br />

application of multiple regression analysis methods yielded the<br />

following regression equation for the experimental data:<br />

Y = 38.69 + 2.82X1 + 1.54X2 − 0.99X1X1 + 0.65X1X2 − 0.788X2X2<br />

(3)<br />

in which Y is the predicted response (lactic acid concentration)<br />

and X1 and X2 are the coded values of the test variables CSL and<br />

Tween 80, respectively.<br />

The highest production of lactic acid was 41.82 g L −1 , obtained<br />

from 60 mL L −1 of CSL and 1.6 mL L −1 of Tween 80 (Table 2).<br />

The response surface quadratic model was performed in<br />

the form of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the results are<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950


Improvement of L(+)-lactic acid production from cassava wastewater www.soci.org<br />

Figure 1. Pareto chart for lactic acid production.<br />

Table 3. Analysis of variance for the quadratic model<br />

Source<br />

Sum of<br />

squares<br />

Degrees<br />

of freedom<br />

Mean<br />

square F-value P > F<br />

Model 93.1299 5 18.6259 19.1045 0.001266<br />

Error 5.84974 6 0.9749<br />

Lack of fit 5.74347 3<br />

Pure error 0.10627 3<br />

Total 98.97964 11<br />

Adjusted R 2 = 0.891.<br />

summarizedinTable 3.Fisher’stestwasusedtocheckthestatistical<br />

significance of Eqn (3). ANOVA of the quadratic regression model<br />

demonstrates that the model is highly significant, as is evident<br />

from Fisher’s test (Fcalc(5, 6) = 19.1045 > Ft(5, 6) = 4.387), and<br />

has a very low probability value ((Pmodel > F) = 0.001266).<br />

The value of the adjusted coefficient of determination (adjusted<br />

R 2 = 0.891) is high, which indicates the high significance of the<br />

model. The high R value (0.969) demonstrates strong agreement<br />

between the experimental observations and predicted values. This<br />

correlation was also demonstrated by the plot of predicted versus<br />

observed lactic acid values, since all points were clustered around<br />

the diagonal line, which means that no significant violations of the<br />

model were found. A plot of residuals versus predicted response<br />

displays no pattern or trend, suggesting that the variance of the<br />

original observation is constant.<br />

The independent variables (X1, X2 and X1 2 ) had a significant<br />

effect (observed from the P-values) and the variables X1, X2 had<br />

a positive effect (Table 4). Thus an increase in the concentration<br />

of these variables led to an increase in response (lactic acid<br />

production).<br />

The 3D response surface is the graphic representation of the<br />

regression equation and is plotted to determine the interaction<br />

of the variables and locate the optimal level of each variable for<br />

maximal response.<br />

Table 4. Least-squares fit and parameter estimates<br />

Term Estimate Standard error t P>|t|<br />

Intercept 38.69300 0.493698 78.37381 0.000000<br />

X1 2.82559 0.349097 8.09399 0.000191<br />

X2 1.53892 0.349097 4.40828 0.004528<br />

X1 2 −0.99063 0.390303 −2.53809 0.044194<br />

X1X2 0.65400 0.493698 1.32470 0.233489<br />

X2 2 −0.78813 0.390303 −2.01927 0.089992<br />

A strong interaction between CSL and Tween 80 in lactic<br />

acid production was found (Fig. 2). The area of greatest lactic<br />

acid production is located between 56 and 66 g L −1 of CSL with<br />

1.0–1.5 mL L −1 of Tween 80.<br />

Once lactic acid bacteria are nutritionally fastidious and require<br />

various amino acids and vitamins for growth, it is very important<br />

to choose the right nitrogen source. Nitrogen is necessary for<br />

the synthesis of amino acids, lipids, enzyme cofactors, some<br />

carbohydrates and other substances. The nitrogen source is a<br />

major factor of influence on the growth of Lactobacillus. 29 As<br />

the synthesis of lactic acid by fermentation is associated with cell<br />

growth, there is no product formation if the medium does not have<br />

an adequate concentration of nitrogen for promoting growth. 30<br />

On the other hand, high concentrations of nitrogen can lead to<br />

cell death. 31<br />

The use of a cheap nitrogen source for the complete<br />

replacement of yeast extract has been widely discussed. 32 Yu<br />

et al. 33 found that CSL not only replaces yeast extract as the<br />

sole nitrogen source in an optimized medium, but also helps<br />

to enhance lactic acid production when associated with other<br />

beneficial medium components.<br />

In the present study, the addition of Tween 80 to the<br />

fermentation medium significantly increased the production<br />

of lactic acid (Fig. 2). Authors have reported that Tween 80<br />

is responsible for increasing the growth of Lactobacillus and<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1947


1948<br />

www.soci.org LF Coelho et al.<br />

Figure 2. Response surface of lactic acid production by L. rhamnosus B 103 showing the interaction between CSL and Tween 80.<br />

Table 5. Stationary point for lactic acid production and coded values<br />

of the variables X1 and X2 on the optimization point<br />

P0 Lactic acid Coordinates Lactic acid<br />

λ1 −1.229 X1 1.276<br />

λ2 −0.548 X2 0.450<br />

lactic acid production, unsaturated fatty acids such as Tween<br />

80 being essential growth factors. 34,35 On the other hand, higher<br />

concentrations of Tween 80 (1.6%, w/v) decreased lactic acid<br />

production. An explanation for this may be that Tween 80 as a<br />

surfactant could dissolve the lipid in the cell membrane, destroy<br />

the membrane structure and then cause the death of the cell. 36,37<br />

The point of maximal lactic acid production was determined<br />

through canonical analysis of the adjusted model. A study was<br />

carried out to identify the nature of the stationary point (maximal<br />

point, low response or saddle point). An algorithm carried out<br />

on the Maple 9.5 program (Waterloo Maple, Inc.) was used to<br />

calculate the stationary point (P0) for the synthesis of lactic acid.<br />

These values are displayed in Table 5.<br />

λ values referring to CSL and Tween 80 indicate that these<br />

responses have a maximal point, as they have equal, negative signs<br />

(Table 5). The analysis determined that the maximal predicted<br />

lactic acid concentration was 41.58 g L −1 with the corresponding<br />

optimal values of the test variables in uncoded units at 65.4 mL L −1<br />

CSL and 1.27 mL L −1 Tween 80. All optimal points were located<br />

within the experimental range and varied around their center<br />

points to different extents. To confirm the adequacy of the model<br />

for predicting maximal lactic acid production, three additional<br />

experiments in a shaker were performed with this optimal medium<br />

composition. The mean value of lactic acid concentration was<br />

41.65 g L −1 , which is in excellent agreement with the predicted<br />

value of 41.58 g L −1 . Thus the model proved adequate.<br />

The scale-up fermentation of lactic acid in the optimal medium<br />

was carried out in the bioreactor. The time courses are displayed in<br />

Fig. 3. During fermentation, the concentration of reducing sugar<br />

decreased from 50 to 0 g L −1 at the end of cultivation and the<br />

growth of L.rhamnosus B 103 kept increasing quickly and appeared<br />

to reach stationary phase at 36 h. The highest productivity<br />

(1.59 g L −1 h −1 ) was obtained after 12 h of fermentation and the<br />

greatest production (39 g L −1 ) occurred after 36 h. Moreover, the<br />

yield and the average volumetric productivity of lactic acid were<br />

as high as 96% and 4.58 g L −1 h −1 , respectively.<br />

The high yield of lactic acid from CW can be attributed to the<br />

high nutritional value found in the production medium. CW is<br />

a nutritious product containing natural sugars, proteins, amino<br />

acids and vitamins that are suitable for the growth of lactic acid<br />

bacteria. Furthermore, the fermentation medium was carried out<br />

after hydrolysis with heating, which removed the inhibitory and<br />

toxic compounds (hydrogen cyanide) and favored the production<br />

of lactic acid. 22<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The use of CW for cultivation of L. rhamnosus is an innovative<br />

proposal, as no references were found in the scientific literature on<br />

the use of this substrate for lactic acid production. Optimization<br />

of the responses revealed that the best result for lactic acid<br />

production (41.58 g L −1 ) was obtained with 65.4 mL L −1 CSL<br />

and 1.27 mL L −1 Tween 80. Thus the results of the present<br />

study demonstrate that the use of CW for the production of<br />

lactic acid from fermentation by L. rhamnosus B 103 is feasible,<br />

with a considerable production of biomass and lactic acid,<br />

requiringonlysupplementationwithacheapnitrogensource(CSL)<br />

and Tween 80. The Plackett–Burman design, central composite<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950


Improvement of L(+)-lactic acid production from cassava wastewater www.soci.org<br />

Figure 3. Concentrations of substrate, product and biomass as a function of fermentation time under optimal conditions in a bioreactor (g L −1 ); (�)<br />

reducing sugar; (�)lacticacid,(◦) biomass.<br />

design, response surface method, regression analysis and model<br />

generation were effective methods for the medium optimization<br />

of lactic acid production.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors thank Plaza SA and Corn Products ® for kindly supplying<br />

the cassava wastewater and corn steep liquor, respectively,<br />

and the Brazilian fostering agency Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa<br />

do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) for the fellowships and financial<br />

support.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Datta R, Tsai SP, Bonsignor P, Moon S and Frank J, Technological and<br />

economical potential of polylactic acid and lactic acid derivatives.<br />

FEMS Microbiol Rev 16:221–231 (1995).<br />

2 Ohara H, Biorefinery. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 62:474–477 (2003).<br />

3 Di Lorenzo ML, Crystallization behavior of poly(L-lactic acid). Eur Polym<br />

J 41:569–575 (2005).<br />

4 RyuHW,YunJSandWeeYJ,Lacticacid,inConcise Encyclopedia of<br />

Bioresource Technology, ed. by Pandey A. Haworth Press, New York<br />

(2003).<br />

5 Yun JS and Ryu HW, Lactic acid production and carbon catabolite<br />

repression from single and mixed sugars using Enterococcus faecalis<br />

RKY1. Proc Biochem 37:235–240 (2001).<br />

6 Lunt J, Large-scale production, properties and commercial<br />

applications of polylactic acid polymers. Polym Degrad Stabil<br />

59:145–152 (1998).<br />

7 Calabia BP and Tokiwa Y, Production of D-lactic acid from sugarcane<br />

molasses, sugarcane juice and sugar beet juice by Lactobacillus<br />

delbrueckii. Biotechnol Lett 29:1329–1332 (2007).<br />

8 Dumbrepatil A, Adsul M, Chaudhari S, Khire J and Gokhale D,<br />

Utilization of molasses sugar for lactic acid production by<br />

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii mutant Uc-3 in batch<br />

fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:333–335 (2008).<br />

9 Buyukkileci AO and Harsa S, Batch production of L(+)lacticacidfrom<br />

whey by Lactobacillus casei (NRRL B-441). J Chem Technol Biotechnol<br />

79:1036–1040 (2004).<br />

10 Yu L, Lei T, Ren X, Pei X and Feng X, Response surface optimization of<br />

L-(+)-lactic acid production using corn steep liquor as an alternative<br />

nitrogen source by Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1466. Biochem<br />

Eng J 39:496–502 (2008).<br />

11 Fitzpatrick JJ and Keeffe UO, Influence of whey protein hydrolyzate<br />

addition to whey permeate batch fermentations for producing<br />

lactic acid. Proc Biochem 37:183–186 (2001).<br />

12 Cardinal EV and Hedrick LR, Microbiological assay of corn steep liquor<br />

for amino acid content. JBiolChem172:609–612 (1948).<br />

13 Nitschke M and Pastore GM, Cassava flour wastewater as a substrate<br />

for biosurfactant production. ApplBiochemBiotechnol 106:295–301<br />

(2003).<br />

14 Nitschke M and Pastore GM, Production and properties of a surfactant<br />

obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater.<br />

Bioresour Technol 97:336–341 (2006).<br />

15 Leonel M and Cereda MP, Citric acid production by Aspergillus niger<br />

from ‘Manipueira’, a manioc liquid residue. Sci Agric 52:299–304<br />

(1995).<br />

16 Costa SGVAO, Lépine F, Milot S, Déziel E, Nitschke M and Contiero J,<br />

Cassava wastewater as a substrate for the simultaneous production<br />

of rhamnolipids and polyhydroxyalkanoates by Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1063–1072 (2009).<br />

17 Xiaodong W, Xuan G and Rakshit SK, Direct fermentative production<br />

of lactic acid on cassava and other starch substrates. Biotechnol Lett<br />

19:841–843 (1997).<br />

18 John RP,Nampoothiri KM and Pandey A, L(+) Lactic acid recovery from<br />

cassava bagasse based fermented medium using anion exchange<br />

resins. Braz Arch Biol Technol 51:1241–1248 (2008).<br />

19 John RP, Nampoothiri KM and Pandey A, Simultaneous saccharification<br />

and fermentation of cassava bagasse for L(+) lacticacidproduction<br />

using Lactobacilli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 134:263–272<br />

(2006).<br />

20 John RP, Sukumaran RK, Nampoothiri KM and Pandey A, Statistical<br />

optimization of simultaneous saccharification and L(+) lactic<br />

acid fermentation from cassava bagasse using mixed culture of<br />

Lactobacilli by response surface methodology. Biochem Eng J<br />

36:262–267 (2007).<br />

21 Roble ND, Ogbonna JC and Tanaka H, l-Lactic acid production from<br />

raw cassava starch in a circulating loop bioreactor with cells<br />

immobilized in loofa (Luffacylindrica). BiotechnolLett 25:1093–1098<br />

(2003).<br />

22 Westby A, Cassava utilization, storage and small-scale processing,<br />

in Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization, ed. by Hillocks RJ,<br />

Tresh JM and Bellotti AC. CAB International, Wallingford, UK,<br />

pp. 281–300 (2002).<br />

23 Miller GL, Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of<br />

reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428 (1959).<br />

24 Büyükkileci AO and Harsa S, Batch production of L(+)lacticacidfrom<br />

whey by Lactobacillus casei (NRRL B-441). J Chem Technol Biotechnol<br />

79:1036–1040 (2004).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1949


1950<br />

25 Fitzpatrick JJ, Ahrens M and Smith S, Effect of manganese on<br />

Lactobacillus casei fermentation to produce lactic acid from whey<br />

permeate. Proc Biochem 36:671–675 (2001).<br />

26 Krischke W, Schroder M and Trosch W, Continuous production of<br />

L-lactic acid from whey permeate by immobilized Lactobacillus<br />

casei subsp. casei. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:573–578 (1991).<br />

27 Naveena BJ, Altaf MD, Bhadriah K and Reddy G, Selection of medium<br />

components by Plackett–Burman design for production of L (+)<br />

lactic acid by Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6 in SSF using wheat<br />

bran. Bioresour Technol 96:485–490 (2005).<br />

28 Honorato TL, Rabelo MC, Pinto GAS and Rodrigues S, Produção de<br />

ácido lático e dextrana utilizando suco de caju como substrato.<br />

Cienc Technol Aliment 27:254–258 (2007).<br />

29 Wood BJB and Holzapfel WH, The Genera of Lactic Acid Bacteria (1st<br />

edn). Blackie Academic and Professional, London (1995).<br />

30 Pritchard G and Coolbear T, The physiology and biochemistry of<br />

the proteolytic system in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol<br />

12:179–206 (1993).<br />

31 De Lima CJB, Coelho LF, Blanco KC and Contiero J, Response surface<br />

optimization of D(−) lactic acid production by Lactobacillus SMI8<br />

www.soci.org LF Coelho et al.<br />

using corn steep liquor and yeast autolysate as an alternative<br />

nitrogen source. Afr J Biotechnol 8:5842–5846 (2009).<br />

32 Liggett RW and Koffler H, Corn steep liquor in microbiology. Microbiol<br />

Mol Biol 12:297–311 (1948).<br />

33 Yu L, Lei T, Ren X, Pei X and Feng X, Response surface optimization of<br />

l-(+)-lactic acid production using corn steep liquor as an alternative<br />

nitrogen source by Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1466. Biochem<br />

Eng J 39:496–502 (2008).<br />

34 Oh S, Rheem S, Sim J, Kim S and Baek Y, Optimizing conditions for the<br />

growth of Lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in tryptone-yeast extractglucose<br />

medium by using response surface methodology. Appl<br />

Environ Microbiol 61:3809–3814 (1995).<br />

35 Belhocine D, Investigations on lactose valorization by lactic acid<br />

fermentation. PhD dissertation, University of Rennes I, France (1987).<br />

36 Ben-Kun Q, Ri-Sheng Y, Min L and Sheng-Song D, Effect of Tween 80<br />

on production of lactic acid by Lactobacillus casei. Songklanakarin J<br />

Sci Technol 31:85–89 (2009).<br />

37 Ben-kun Q and Ri-sheng Y, L-Lactic acid production from Lactobacillus<br />

casei by solid state fermentation using rice straw. BioResources<br />

2:419–429 (2007).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1944–1950


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Article</strong><br />

Received: 7 March 2010 Revised: 25 April 2010 Accepted: 12 May 2010 Published online in Wiley Interscience: 16 June 2010<br />

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI 10.1002/jsfa.4040<br />

Antioxidant activities of aged oat vinegar<br />

in vitro and in mouse serum and liver<br />

Ju Qiu, a Changzhong Ren, b,c Junfeng Fan d and Zaigui Li a∗<br />

Abstract<br />

BACKGROUND: The present study focused on the antioxidant activities of aged oat (Avena sativa L.) vinegar. The antioxidant<br />

activities of oat and vinegar have been proved by many previous research studies. It should be noted that oat vinegar, as a<br />

novel seasoning, has antioxidant activity.<br />

RESULTS: Oat vinegar showed stronger radical scavenging activities, reducing power, and inhibition of lipid peroxidation than<br />

rice vinegar. The concentrations of polyphenols and flavonoids in oat vinegar were higher than those in rice vinegar. Ethyl<br />

acetate extract of oat vinegar possessed the most varieties of phenolic acids and showed the strongest antioxidant activity<br />

compared with ethanol and water extracts. At suitable doses of oat vinegar, the malondialdehyde value was decreased, activities<br />

of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase were promoted, and hepatic damage induced by 60 Co γ -irradiation was<br />

ameliorated in aging mice.<br />

CONCLUSION: Oat vinegar manifested antioxidant activity which was stronger than that of rice vinegar in vitro and the same as<br />

that of vitamin E in vivo.<br />

c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

Keywords: oat (Avena sativa L.) vinegar; antioxidant; in vitro; in vivo<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Oxidative free radicals will induce oxidative stress if the<br />

unnecessary free radicals are not eradicated efficiently. Overproduction<br />

of free radicals is toxic to hepatocytes and initiates<br />

reactive oxygen species (ROS). 1 Previous studies indicated that<br />

oxidative stress might play a key role in the pathogenesis of<br />

liver diseases, including drug-induced hepatic damage, alcoholic<br />

hepatitis, and viral hepatitis or ischemic liver injury. 2 Therefore,<br />

antioxidative treatment has been proposed as a potential means<br />

to prevent or attenuate oxidative damage in vivo.<br />

Vinegar, as a widely used acidic seasoning, has medicinal uses by<br />

virtue of its physiological effects, such as antioxidant, antibacterial<br />

activity, promoting recovery from exhaustion, and regulating<br />

blood pressure and blood glucose. 3–6 There have been many<br />

reports concerning antioxidant activities of different vinegars<br />

made from various materials, such as rice vinegar, wine vinegar,<br />

balsamic vinegar and aromatic rice vinegar. 7–10<br />

Oat vinegar is a new kind of aged vinegar, which is produced<br />

mainly from oats. Oats (AvenasativaL.) contain several families<br />

of phytochemicals that display antioxidant properties, such as<br />

tocotrienols, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, sterols, phytic acids<br />

and avenanthramides. 11 Oats contain 8.7 mg kg −1 free phenolic<br />

acids, 20.6 mg kg −1 soluble phenolic acids and 57 mg kg −1<br />

insoluble phenolic acids. The total phenolic acid content (mainly<br />

avenanthramides and ferulic and vanillic acids) was significantly<br />

correlated with antioxidant activity in vitro. 12 However, the<br />

antioxidant activity of oat vinegar and its antioxidant compounds<br />

still need to be researched.<br />

This study focused on the antioxidant activities of oat vinegar<br />

in vitro and in vivo. The indexes of antioxidant activity in vitro<br />

were analyzed by 2,2 ′ -azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic<br />

acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging activity, reducing power and<br />

inhibition of lipid peroxidation. Aging model mice exposed to 60 Co<br />

γ -irradiation once were orally administered with different doses of<br />

oat vinegar or vitamin E (VE) (as positive control). Enzyme activities<br />

of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-<br />

PX), and the values of malondialdehyde (MDA) in liver and blood<br />

serum of mice, as well as liver histopathological section, were<br />

detected to demonstrate the antioxidant activity in mice.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Materials<br />

Oat vinegar, produced in 2007, was obtained from Shanxi Ziyuan<br />

Microorganism R&D Co., Ltd (Shanxi, China). The vinegar was<br />

produced from oats (about 700 g kg −1 of all raw materials) mixed<br />

∗ Correspondence to: Zaigui Li, Box 40, China Agricultural University, No. 17<br />

Qinghua Dong Lu, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, China.<br />

E-mail: lizg@cau.edu.cn<br />

a College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural<br />

University, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China<br />

b Department of Agronomy, China Agricultural University, Haidian, Beijing<br />

100094, China<br />

c Oat Engineering and Technique <strong>Research</strong> Center of Jilin Province, Baicheng,<br />

Jilin 137000, China<br />

d College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian,<br />

Beijing 100083, China<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958 www.soci.org c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry<br />

1951


1952<br />

Table 1. Compositions of oat vinegar<br />

Content Method<br />

Protein (g L −1 ) 64.8 ± 0.82 AACC 46-11A, 2000<br />

Aminoacid(g L −1 ) 15.2 ± 0.00 AACC 07-01, 2000<br />

Fat (g L −1 ) 9.8 ± 0.02 AACC 30-20, 2000<br />

Reducing sugar (g L −1 ) 129.8 ± 2.09 AACC 80-68, 2000<br />

Moisture (g L −1 ) 889.4 ± 0.11 AACC 44-19, 2000<br />

pH value 3.95 ± 0.01<br />

with rice hull, wheat bran and Koji (oats and pea yeast). It was<br />

processed through saccharification, alcohol fermentation, static<br />

surface acetic acid fermentation, roasting, leaching and aging.<br />

Rice vinegar was purchased from Beijing Liubiju Co. (Beijing,<br />

China). The composition of the oat vinegar is shown in Table 1.<br />

Polyphenolic and flavonoid content of vinegar<br />

Total polyphenolic content in oat vinegar was determined using<br />

the Folin–Ciocalteu method. 13 Oat vinegar (200 µL) at an appropriate<br />

concentration (diluted 20, 40 or 80 times with distilled water)<br />

was added sequentially with 1.0 mL Folin–Ciocalteu reagent,<br />

1.0 mL of 0.707 mol L −1 Na2CO3 solution and 2.8 mL distilled<br />

water. The mixture was analyzed at 765 nm by spectrophotometer<br />

(UVmini-1240, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) 30 min later. Results were<br />

expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents mL −1 vinegar. Rice vinegar<br />

was used as a control and compared with oat vinegar.<br />

Total flavonoid content in oat vinegar was determined as<br />

described by Zhishen et al. 14 Briefly, 1.0 mL of appropriately<br />

diluted vinegar (diluted four, six or eight times with distilled water)<br />

was added to 4.0 mL distilled water. NaNO2 (0.3 mL, 0.725 mol L −1 )<br />

was added immediately, and AlCl3 (0.3 mL, 0.758 mol L −1 )was<br />

added 5 min later. After 6 min, 2.0 mL of 1 mol L −1 NaOH was<br />

added and the solution was made up to 10.0 mL with distilled<br />

water and mixed for 5 s by vibrator. Absorbance was determined<br />

at 510 nm. The total flavonoid content was expressed in mg rutin<br />

equivalent mL −1 vinegar.<br />

Antioxidant activity of vinegar in vitro<br />

The effect of the vinegar on ABTS radical was detected using a<br />

modified ABTS decolorization assay, 15 which is applicable to both<br />

hydrophilic and lipophilic compounds. The ABTS radical cation was<br />

produced by reacting a 7.0 mmol L −1 stock solution of ABTS with<br />

2.45 mmol L −1 potassium persulfate. The mixture was stood in the<br />

dark for at least 12 h at room temperature before use. The ABTS<br />

radical solution was diluted to obtain an absorbance of 0.75±0.05<br />

at 734 nm. Diluted ABTS solution, prepared as described above,<br />

was mixed with vinegar and measured at 405 nm after 6 min.<br />

The parameter IC50, reflecting the concentration of scavenging<br />

free radical to 50%, was calculated using the standard curve,<br />

plotting the percentage for inhibition of absorbance versus the<br />

concentration of sample. The IC50 of the sample was compared<br />

with that of Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2carboxylic<br />

acid), a reference standard. Finally, the ABTS radical<br />

scavenging activities of samples were expressed as mg Trolox<br />

equivalents mL −1 .<br />

The reducing power of oat vinegar was determined according<br />

to the method of Amarowicz et al. 16 Oat vinegar (0.5 mL),<br />

200 mmol L −1 sodium phosphate buffer (0.5 mL, pH 6.6) and<br />

0.5 mL potassium ferricyanide (0.03 mol L −1 ) were mixed and<br />

www.soci.org J Qiu et al.<br />

incubated in a water bath at 50 ◦ C. After 20 min, 0.5 mL<br />

trichloroacetic acid (0.612 mol L −1 ) was added to the mixture<br />

and centrifuged at 240 × g for 10 min. The supernatant (1.0 mL)<br />

was then mixed with 1 mL distilled water and 1 mL ferric chloride<br />

solution (6.16 mmol L −1 ). The intensity of blue-green color was<br />

measured at 700 nm using the spectrophotometer. The reducing<br />

powers of rice vinegar and VE solution (4.5 mg mL −1 ) were<br />

measured in the same way.<br />

The efficacy of inhibiting lipid peroxidation was determined<br />

according to the method of Zin et al. 17 Vinegar sample (diluted<br />

five times, 4.0 mL), 0.089 mol L −1 linoleicacidinethanol(4.1mL),<br />

0.05 mol L −1 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 8.0 mL) and distilled water<br />

(3.9 mL) were mixed and then kept at 40 ◦ C in the dark. Every<br />

24 h, 0.1 mL of this reaction mixture was drawn and mixed with<br />

9.7 mL of 75.0% (v/v) ethanol, 0.1 mL of 3.94 mol L −1 ammonium<br />

thiocyanate and 0.1 mL of 0.02 mol L −1 ferrous chloride in<br />

0.96 mol L −1 hydrochloric acid. After 3 min, the intensity of<br />

red color was measured at 500 nm. These procedures were<br />

repeateduntiltheblankcontrolwithoutsamplereachedmaximum<br />

absorbance. Rice vinegar and VE solution (4.5 mg mL −1 ) were<br />

measured in the same way. The antioxidant activities of all samples<br />

detected by three methods were analyzed in triplicate.<br />

Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of oat vinegar<br />

in solvents with different polarities<br />

Ethyl acetate, ethanol and water with different polarities were<br />

used to extract phenolic compounds of oat vinegar consecutively.<br />

Oat vinegar (100 mL) was concentrated to a final volume of 50 mL<br />

at 37 ◦ C in a vacuum rotary evaporator (Laborota 4000, Heidolph,<br />

Schwabach, Germany). Concentrated oat vinegar was extracted<br />

with 150 mL ethyl acetate with sufficient shaking for 30 s and<br />

standing in a water bath at 40 ◦ C for 10 min. The ethyl acetate layer<br />

and residue were separated absolutely. These procedures were<br />

repeated three times and ethyl acetate layers were mixed. The<br />

residue was further extracted successively with ethanol (150 mL)<br />

and water (150 mL) using the same steps as that of ethyl acetate<br />

extracts. All three solutions of extracts were evaporated to dryness<br />

at 37 ◦ C under vacuum. The dried extracts were redissolved in<br />

methanol to a final volume of 50 mL for further analysis by<br />

high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection<br />

(HPLC-DAD). Aliquots of dissolved extracts were diluted with<br />

Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4, 0.1 mmol L −1 ) to measure ABTS radical<br />

scavenging activity and total polyphenols. The solutions of ethyl<br />

acetate, ethanol and water extracts were analyzed in triplicate.<br />

Ethyl acetate, ethanol and water extracts were analyzed by<br />

HPLC-DAD (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), including a (model LC-<br />

10ATvp instrument with two pumps and DGU-12A degasser)<br />

and a diode array detector (model SPD-M10Avp). Separation<br />

was performed on a Shim-Pack VP-ODS column (150 × 4.6mm<br />

i.d., particle size 5 µm) with a guard column (Shim-pack G VP-<br />

ODS, 10 × 4.6mm,particlesize5µm) (Shimadzu). Mobile phases<br />

consisted of acetonitrile (solvent B) and purified water with 0.1%<br />

trifluoroacetic acid (solvent A) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min −1 .<br />

Gradient elution was performed as described by Tian et al. 18<br />

Phenolic compounds in the samples were detected at 280 nm by<br />

an external standard method and identified by comparing their<br />

relative retention times and UV spectra with authentic compounds<br />

(Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany).<br />

Animals and diets<br />

Sixty Kun Ming male mice (body weight (b.w.) 18–22 g) were<br />

purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of the Academy<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958


Antioxidant activities of oat vinegar in vitro and in vivo www.soci.org<br />

of Military Medical Sciences of China, Beijing, China. The mice, in<br />

stainless wire netting cages, were acclimatized under laboratory<br />

conditions (temperature 21–23 ◦ C; relative humidity 55–60%) for<br />

1 week. These mice were then divided randomly into six groups of<br />

10 animals each, referred to as blank, aging model, VE, and three<br />

oat vinegar groups (low, medium and high). All mice were fed with<br />

basic diet ad libitum. Mice in the VE group were administered VE<br />

at a dose of 25.0 mg kg −1 b.w. by gavage every day. Mice in the<br />

oat vinegar groups of low, medium and high were administered<br />

oat vinegar at doses of 1.5, 3.0 and 6.0 mL kg −1 b.w., respectively,<br />

by gavage every day. After 26 days of gastric perfusion, all mice<br />

except the blank group were exposed to 60 Co γ -irradiation at a<br />

dose of 1 Gy min −1 for 4 min. After 30 days of gastric perfusion, all<br />

mice were fasted for 12 h before operation.<br />

The basic dietwas purchased from the LaboratoryAnimal Center<br />

of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences of China, Beijing,<br />

China. The pH value of oat vinegar was adjusted to 6.0 ± 0.1 by<br />

NaOH.<br />

Preparation of blood serum and tissue samples<br />

All mice were cared for according to the Guiding Principles in<br />

the Care and Use of Animals. The experiments were approved by<br />

Peking University Council on Animal Care Committee. At the end<br />

of the trial, blood samples of mice in each group were collected<br />

by extirpating their eyes, and then the livers were immediately<br />

excised. The blood samples collected into tubes were centrifuged<br />

at 3000 × g for 10 min for the separation of serum, which was<br />

stored at −80 ◦ C until analysis.<br />

The livers, washed with ice-cold physiological saline solution<br />

(0.155 mol L −1 ), were stored at −80 ◦ C in liquid nitrogen. Part<br />

of the liver tissue, dipped in 0.1 mol L −1 of ice-cold phosphatebuffered<br />

saline (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.158 mol L −1 KCl), was cut into pieces<br />

and milled to prepare a 100 g L −1 solution of tissue homogenate.<br />

This tissue homogenate was centrifuged at 10 000 × g for 15 min<br />

and the supernatant was kept for analysis. The tissue samples of<br />

livers and blood serum of all mice were used to measure enzyme<br />

activities of SOD and GSH-PX, and the value of MDA.<br />

Antioxidant activity of oat vinegar in vivo<br />

The protein contents of different blood serum and tissue samples<br />

were measured using a bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein assay<br />

kit using BSA as standard. Malondialdehyde (MDA) level was<br />

determined using an MDA assay kit A003 based on the method of<br />

Esterbauer and Cheeseman. 19 SOD activity was determined with<br />

SOD assay kit A001 according to Oyanagui’s method. 20 GSH-PX<br />

activity was determined using a GSH-PX assay kit A005. 21 All kits<br />

were purchased from the Institute of Biological Engineering of<br />

Nanjing Jianchen, Nanjing, China.<br />

Liver tissues were removed immediately after sacrifice and fixed<br />

in 10.0% (v/v) buffered formalin solution for at least 24 h, then<br />

embedded in paraffin wax and sectioned (5.0 µm thickness) for<br />

histopathological evaluation. Liver sections were stained with<br />

hematoxylin and eosin using a standard protocol, and then<br />

analyzed by light microscopy.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

Statistical analyzes were run using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc.,<br />

Chicago, IL, USA). Data were expressed as means and standard<br />

deviations. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance<br />

(ANOVA). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine<br />

differences among means. Results were considered statistically<br />

significant at P < 0.05.<br />

Antioxidant compounds mg mL -1<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

*<br />

Polyphenols Flavonoids<br />

*<br />

Oat vinegar<br />

Rice vinegar<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

ABTS radical scavenging activity<br />

(mg trolox eq mL-1 )<br />

Figure 1. Concentration of polyphenolic and flavonoid and activity of ABTS<br />

radical scavenging of vinegars. Values represent the mean ± standard<br />

deviation (n = 3). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and within each column<br />

an asterisk indicates statistically different values according to Duncan’s<br />

multiple range test at P < 0.01.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Antioxidant activities of oat vinegar in vitro<br />

Polyphenols and flavonoids were found to be the most effective<br />

antioxidant constituents in oats and vinegars. 9–11,22 As shown in<br />

Fig. 1, the contents of polyphenols and flavonoids in oat vinegar<br />

were 5.29 and 2.04 mg mL −1 , respectively. They were not only<br />

significantly higher than rice vinegar (P < 0.01) but also higher<br />

than traditional balsamic vinegar (3.72 and 0.58 mg mL −1 ) 9 and<br />

Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar (4.18 and 1.10 mg mL −1 ). 10<br />

ABTS radical scavenging activity was determined as a function<br />

of concentration and calculated with the reactivity of Trolox as<br />

standard. 15 The IC50 value of Trolox measured in this study was<br />

4.65 µgmL −1 , which was the same as in a previous report. 23 The<br />

ABTS radical scavenging activity of oat vinegar was 4.42 mg mL −1 ,<br />

which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of rice vinegar<br />

(0.37 mg mL −1 )(Fig.1).<br />

Reducing power was measured by the potassium ferricyanide<br />

reductionmethod.Antioxidantsreducedtheferricion/ferricyanide<br />

complex to the ferrous form: the Perls Prussian blue complex. 24<br />

Antioxidant activity was expressed as the increase in absorbance.<br />

As shown in Fig. 2, reducing power was increased with the<br />

increase in concentrations of vinegars and VE. Oat vinegar showed<br />

significantly higher reducing power than rice vinegar (P < 0.05),<br />

but was not significantly different from VE (P > 0.05).<br />

Peroxidation of fatty acids causes deleterious effects in foods by<br />

forming complex mixtures of secondary breakdown products of<br />

lipidperoxides.Therefore,thevinegarwasfurthercharacterizedfor<br />

antioxidant activities by assessing the ability to protect linoleic acid<br />

against oxidation. The oxidation of linoleic acid without vinegar<br />

was accompanied by a rapid increase in peroxide value (Fig. 3).<br />

Conversely, the peroxide value of oat or rice vinegar increased<br />

slowly, indicating that vinegars had an inhibitory activity on lipid<br />

peroxidation. VE exhibited the most obvious effect and oat vinegar<br />

was the second.<br />

Different systems focused on different mechanisms of the<br />

oxidant defense system were used to measure the antioxidant<br />

activity of oat vinegar in vitro. ABTS assay is based on the<br />

activation of metmyoglobin with hydrogen peroxide in the<br />

presence of ABTS to produce the radical cation, in the presence<br />

or absence of antioxidants. 15 Reducing power based on the<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

*<br />

1953


1954<br />

Figure 2. Reducing power of vinegars and vitamin E (VE). VE was used as a<br />

positive control. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).<br />

Figure 3. Inhibition of lipid peroxidation of vinegars and vitamin E (VE).<br />

VE was used as a positive control. Values represent the mean ± standard<br />

deviation (n = 3).<br />

FeCl3/K3Fe(CN)6 system offers a sensitive method for detecting<br />

the electron-donating ability of antioxidants. Antioxidants such as<br />

polyphenols should be able to terminate radical chain reactions<br />

by converting free radicals to more stable products. 16 Besides, the<br />

inhibition of lipid peroxidation was measured by ferric thiocyanate<br />

(FTC) methods. This method measures the ability of antioxidants<br />

to scavenge peroxyl radicals, which react with polyunsaturated<br />

fatty acids, through hydrogen donation. 25 Therefore, reducing<br />

power and inhibition of lipid peroxidation can explain the radical<br />

scavenging ability.<br />

In the present study, the antioxidant activity of oat vinegar<br />

was first evaluated by ABTS radical scavenging activity. This<br />

demonstrated that the antioxidant activity of 1 mL oat vinegar<br />

was equal to that of 4.42 mg Trolox. According to this relationship,<br />

4.5 mg mL −1 VE solution was used as a positive control in<br />

the following measurements of reducing power and lipid<br />

peroxidation. VE showed the same reducing power as oat vinegar<br />

www.soci.org J Qiu et al.<br />

but higher inhibition of lipid peroxidation. That is to say, the ability<br />

of oat vinegar to supply electron and eliminate ABTS radical was<br />

the same as that of VE, but the capacity of scavenging peroxyl<br />

radicals was lower than that of VE.<br />

The results also showed that oat vinegar possessed stronger<br />

antioxidant activity than rice vinegar in all systems. It is considered<br />

that high contents of polyphenols and flavonoids play an<br />

important role in antioxidant activity of oat vinegar. It has been<br />

reported that the antioxidant activities of vinegars are result<br />

mainly from antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols and<br />

flavonoids. 7–9 Polyphenolspotentiallyhaveantioxidantproperties<br />

due to the presence of an aromatic phenolic ring that can stabilize<br />

and delocalize the unpaired electron within its aromatic ring. 12<br />

Verzelloni et al. 9 demonstrated that polyphenols and flavonoids<br />

were highly correlated (r = 0.975 and r = 0.914, respectively)<br />

with the ABTS radical scavenging activity of traditional balsamic<br />

vinegar, as well as red wine vinegar. They also showed that<br />

the concentrations of polyphenols and flavonoids were positive<br />

correlated with reducing power. Alonso et al. 8 showed that the<br />

content of phenolic acids in sherry wine vinegar was highly<br />

correlated with ABTS radical scavenging activities, especially gallic<br />

acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillin, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid and<br />

vanillic acid. In this study, excellent antioxidant activities of oat<br />

vinegar with high concentrations of polyphenols and flavonoids<br />

also confirmed the results.<br />

Phenolic compounds of oat vinegar extracts<br />

Liquid–liquid extraction is commonly used to analyze polyphenols<br />

and simple phenolics in natural plants for its efficiency and wideranging<br />

applicability. 26 Ethyl acetate, ethanol and water were used<br />

as solvents in the present study. The compositions of polyphenols<br />

and antioxidant activities of their extracts from oat vinegar are<br />

shown in Table 2. Concentrations of gallic acid and (+)-catechin<br />

in ethanol extract were the highest, but the other phenolic acids<br />

in ethyl acetate extract were higher than in ethanol or water<br />

extract. Water extract had less phenolic acid, and only gallic<br />

and protocatechuic acids were detected. Protocatechuic acid<br />

in extracts of oat vinegar was highest, with gallic acid second.<br />

Total polyphenols in ethanol and water extracts of oat vinegar<br />

were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that in ethyl acetate<br />

extracts, which showed the strongest ABTS radical scavenging<br />

activity. However, the content of total polyphenols and ABTS<br />

radical scavenging activity of water extracts were higher than<br />

those of ethanol extract, which may be ascribed to the aqueous<br />

antioxidant compounds in vinegar. In addition, the summation<br />

of Trolox equivalents of three extracts accounted for about 87%<br />

of that of oat vinegar. That is, three extracts contained primary<br />

antioxidant compounds of oat vinegar, which played a central role<br />

as antioxidant.<br />

Early work aiming at identifying the compounds that were<br />

responsible for the antioxidant properties of oat or vinegar showed<br />

a good correlation between antioxidant capacity and content of<br />

phenolic compounds. 8,27 In oat, ferulic acid was the dominant<br />

phenolic acid, while p-coumaric, caffeic and vanillic acids could<br />

be detected in small quantities. 11 In vinegar, the contents of<br />

gallic, protocatechuic, p-coumaric, ferulic, vanillic and caffeic acids<br />

were very closely correlated with antioxidant activities, according<br />

to research on sherry wine vinegar. 8 Moreover, some studies<br />

showed that (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin were present in<br />

red wine vinegar. 28 The concentration of protocatechuic acid in<br />

oat vinegar extracts was higher than that of red wine vinegar, 28<br />

sherry wine vinegar, 8 common white vinegar and rose vinegar. 29<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958


Antioxidant activities of oat vinegar in vitro and in vivo www.soci.org<br />

Table 2. Compositions of polyphenols and antioxidant activities in different extracts of oat vinegar<br />

Ethyl acetate extract Ethanol extract Water extract<br />

Gallic acid (mg L−1 ) 10.12 ± 0.78Aa 50.38 ± 2.48Ba 5.48 ± 0.12Ca<br />

Protocatechuic acid (mg L−1 ) 185.26 ± 1.48Ab 91.94 ± 1.73Bb 20.65 ± 1.02Cb<br />

(+)-Catechin (mg L−1 ) – 7.26 ± 0.32c –<br />

Vanillic acid (mg L−1 ) 37.39 ± 0.50c – –<br />

Caffeic acid (mg L−1 ) 39.99 ± 2.52c – –<br />

(−)-Epicatechin (mg L−1 ) 16.98 ± 2.83Ad 9.28 ± 2.49Bc –<br />

p-Coumaric acid (mg L−1 ) 10.82 ± 0.79Aa 4.17 ± 0.31Bd –<br />

Ferulic acid (mg L−1 ) 9.31 ± 1.40a – –<br />

Total polyphenols (mg g−1 ) 39.94 ± 3.50A 9.48 ± 1.71B 15.75 ± 2.30C<br />

ABTS radical scavenging activity (mg Trolox<br />

eq. mL −1 ) a<br />

2.13 ± 0.11A 0.70 ± 0.10B 1.04 ± 0.08C<br />

mg L −1 : mean of triplicate determinations ± SD expressed as milligrams of phenolic acid per liter of oat vinegar.<br />

mg g −1 : mean of triplicate determinations ± SD expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per gram of oat vinegar extracts.<br />

a Mean of triplicate determinations ± SD expressed as milligrams of Trolox equivalents of extracts per milliliter of oat vinegar.<br />

Data were analyzed by ANOVA and statistically significant differences were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05. Different capital<br />

letters (A, B, C) in a row indicate significant difference among extracts. Different lower-case letters (a, b, c) in a column indicate significant difference<br />

among phenolic acids.<br />

Table 3. Values of MDA, SOD and GSH-PX activities in blood serum of mice<br />

Groups MDA (nmol mL −1 ) SOD(UmL −1 ) GSH-PX(UmL −1 )<br />

Blank 5.07 ± 0.55ab 212.81 ± 19.97a 872.18 ± 82.14a<br />

Aging model 5.98 ± 0.38a 174.95 ± 37.92b 734.83 ± 87.63b<br />

VE 5.10 ± 0.53ab 214.62 ± 24.82a 943.35 ± 95.46a<br />

Oat vinegar (low) 4.83 ± 0.36b 229.30 ± 19.96a 863.70 ± 83.79a<br />

Oat vinegar (medium) 4.70 ± 0.412b 236.49 ± 25.67a 875.35 ± 84.44a<br />

Oat vinegar (high) 4.95 ± 0.32b 176.71 ± 29.54b 853.82 ± 80.23a<br />

Data were analyzed by ANOVA and the groups in the same column with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to<br />

Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate assays in 10 animals in each group.<br />

Blank: fed with basic diet; Aging model: fed with basic diet; VE: fed with basic diet and administered VE at a dose of 25 mg kg −1 b.w. by gavage every<br />

day; Oat vinegar low, medium and high: fed with basic diet and oat vinegar administered at a dose of 1.5, 3.0 and 6.0 mL kg −1 b.w. respectively. With<br />

the exception of Blank, other groups were exposed to 60 Co γ -irradiation at a dose of 1 Gy min −1 for 4 min.<br />

However, the content of gallic acid was less than that of red wine<br />

vinegar 28 or sherry wine vinegar. 8 Ferulic acid, the most abundant<br />

phenolic acid in oat, was not so high in oat vinegar, indicating<br />

that the contents of phenolic compounds were changed during<br />

processing. Cerezo et al. have shown the effects of aging and wood<br />

on the phenolic profile of wine vinegar. 30 The effect of processing<br />

such as fermentation, roasting and aging on the antioxidant<br />

activity of oat vinegar should be further studied.<br />

Antioxidant activities of oat vinegar in vivo<br />

Many studies have shown that 60 Co γ -irradiation induces hepatic<br />

damage and reduces SOD and GSH-PX activities in liver and blood<br />

serum. 31 This study used 60 Co γ -irradiation to set up the aging<br />

model. It was shown that SOD and GSH-PX activities of the aging<br />

model group were decreased both in blood serum (Table 3) and<br />

in liver (Table 4).<br />

VE, as a peroxyl radical scavenger, is one of the most popular<br />

natural phenolic type antioxidants. 23 In this study MDA values in<br />

liver were lower, while activities of SOD and GSH-PX in liver and<br />

blood serum of mice in the VE group were higher than those in<br />

the aging model group. That is, VE showed obvious antioxidant<br />

activities in blood serum (Table 3) and liver (Table 4). There was no<br />

significant difference of MDA value and enzyme activities among<br />

VE and blank group in blood serum and liver, indicating that the<br />

antioxidant activity of VE was strong enough to make aging mice<br />

become normal, as the report of Wang et al. 23<br />

Compared with the aging model group, the MDA value of<br />

oat vinegar groups was obviously decreased (P < 0.05) in blood<br />

serum (Table 3). There was no significant difference in MDA values<br />

(P > 0.05) among VE and oat vinegar groups. That is, oat vinegar<br />

had a strong ability to reduce MDA content, similar to VE. The<br />

SOD activities of low and medium oat vinegar groups were higher<br />

(P < 0.05) than that of the aging model group, and not obviously<br />

different (P > 0.05) from that of VE. Hence oat vinegar at a dose of<br />

medium or low could strengthen SOD activity. The GSH-PX activity<br />

of the aging model group was evidently lower (P < 0.05) than that<br />

of other groups, suggesting that oat vinegar could promote GSH-<br />

PX activity in the blood serum of mice. There was no significant<br />

difference in MDA, SOD and GSH-PX values among oat vinegar<br />

(low and medium) and blank groups (P > 0.05). It was concluded<br />

that the antioxidant activity of oat vinegar was high enough to<br />

restore the blood serum of aging mice to normal.<br />

Table 4 demonstrates that the MDA content of oat vinegar<br />

groups was lower (P < 0.05) than that of the aging model in<br />

liver of mice. In the case of low and high doses, there was no<br />

significant difference in MDA value among oat vinegar groups<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1955


1956<br />

Table 4. Values of MDA and SOD and GSH-PX activities in liver of mice<br />

www.soci.org J Qiu et al.<br />

Groups MDA (nmol mg −1 protein) SOD (U mg −1 protein) GSH-PX (U mg −1 protein)<br />

Blank 2.21 ± 0.29ab 164.83 ± 26.65a 120.30 ± 26.92a<br />

Aging model 2.63 ± 0.23b 121.05 ± 28.77b 97.61 ± 7.17b<br />

VE 2.12 ± 0.31a 165.24 ± 7.10a 223.73 ± 18.52c<br />

Oat vinegar (low) 1.80 ± 0.20ac 150.63 ± 20.85a 120.16 ± 21.81a<br />

Oat vinegar (medium) 1.60 ± 0.24c 160.38 ± 22.16a 180.99 ± 34.89ac<br />

Oat vinegar (high) 1.74 ± 0.29ac 127.79 ± 14.98b 110.51 ± 20.81a<br />

Data were analyzed by ANOVA and the groups in the same column with different letters indicate statistically significant differences according to<br />

Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate assays in 10 animals in each group.<br />

For explanation of groups see note to Table 3.<br />

Figure 4. Effect of oat vinegar on acute liver damage induced by 60 Co γ -irradiation in mice. (A) Normal liver from blank group (magnification 200×).<br />

(B) Liver from aging model (magnification 200×). (C) Liver from aging model (magnification 400×). (D) Liver from VE group (magnification 200×). (E) Liver<br />

from low oat vinegar group (magnification 200×). (F) Liver from medium oat vinegar group (magnification 200×). 1: hepatocyte necrosis or apoptosis; 2:<br />

inflammatory cell infiltration; 3: vacuolar degeneration.<br />

and VE or blank group. For medium dose, however, the MDA<br />

value of oat vinegar was higher than that of VE or blank group.<br />

SOD and GSH-PX activities of medium oat vinegar group were<br />

significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those of the aging model<br />

group, but not evidently different (P > 0.05) from VE and blank<br />

groups. These results suggested that oat vinegar at a medium dose<br />

(3.0 mL kg −1 b.w.) showed the most efficient effects on decreasing<br />

MDA content, while increasing SOD and GSH-PX activities in<br />

mouse liver. The relatively weaker effect of oat vinegar at low<br />

dose (1.5 mL kg −1 b.w.) may be attributed to insufficient intake<br />

of antioxidant compounds such as polyphenols and flavonoids in<br />

the diet, because of the high correlation between concentrations<br />

of polyphenols and flavonoids and the antioxidant activity. 9 As for<br />

high dose (6.0 mL kg −1 b.w.), the antioxidant activities were not<br />

obvious, which may be due to an excessively high concentration<br />

of acetic acid in vinegar, which can cause gastric ulcer 32 or colitis, 33<br />

thus affecting the healthy growth of mice.<br />

MDA content is a good indicator of lipid peroxidation. In<br />

blood serum and liver of mice, the values for oat vinegar groups<br />

were decreased significantly (Tables 3 and 4). This indicated that<br />

the protective role of oat vinegar against oxidative damage<br />

in vivo might be due to the decrease in lipid oxidation. Another<br />

antioxidant mechanism of oat vinegar may be related to<br />

antioxidant enzymes. Antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and GSH-<br />

PX are capable of eliminating active oxygen species and inhibiting<br />

lipid peroxidation to protect tissues from oxidative damage. In<br />

fact, the normal body possesses enzymatic systems to protect<br />

tissues and organs. 34 However, 60 Co γ -irradiation can lead to<br />

the oxidation and the decrease of antioxidant enzyme in vivo. 35<br />

Compared with the aging model group, low and medium dose<br />

of oat vinegar promoted the activities of SOD and GSH-PX both<br />

in blood serum and in liver. This suggests that oat vinegar could<br />

protect tissues and organs from oxidative damage by promoting<br />

the antioxidant enzyme. Interestingly, a high dose of oat vinegar<br />

can promote GSH-PX activity but not SOD activity, which might<br />

be attributed to the different effects of oat vinegar on different<br />

antioxidant enzymes.<br />

Moreover, the change in enzyme activities may be related to<br />

the absorption and metabolism of antioxidant components in oat<br />

vinegar. Phenolic type antioxidant influences the polyethylene<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958


Antioxidant activities of oat vinegar in vitro and in vivo www.soci.org<br />

network formulation and radical yield during the process of<br />

irradiation. 35 Phenolic acids are believed to act mainly as free<br />

radical scavengers or chelators of transition metals. However, their<br />

mechanisms of action in vivo are not fully elucidated.<br />

Histopathological analyses<br />

Histopathological changes of mice from blank, aging model, VE<br />

and oat vinegar (low and medium) groups are compared in Fig. 4.<br />

There was no abnormal appearance or histological change in the<br />

liver of normal mice (Fig. 4(A)). Irradiation with 60 Co γ -rays caused<br />

damage in the mouse liver, demonstrated by severe hepatocyte<br />

necrosis or apoptosis, inflammatory cell infiltration (Fig. 4(B)) and<br />

vacuolar degeneration in the aging model group (Fig. 4(C)). It was<br />

reported that 60 Co γ -irradiation induced physical and chemical<br />

damage to tissues, leading to organelle injuries, cell death or<br />

neoplastic transformation. 31<br />

Conversely, in the VE group, much vacuolar degeneration was<br />

observed but hepatocyte necrosis, apoptosis and inflammatory<br />

cell infiltration were not obvious (Fig. 4(D)). This means that<br />

irradiation damage in the VE group was mitigated somewhat<br />

compared with that of the aging model group. VE acts as a free<br />

radical scavenger, more specifically within cell membranes via<br />

preventing the oxidation of polyunsaturated lipids by free radicals<br />

such as hydroxyl radicals (OH). Thus VE can improve various<br />

parameters of oxidative stress in animals. 12 The same result was<br />

detected in vivo in this study.<br />

Compared with the blank group, some vacuolar degeneration<br />

and hepatocyte necrosis or apoptosis could still be observed<br />

in liver from the low oat vinegar group (Fig. 4(E)). However, in<br />

the medium oat vinegar group, not only were inflammatory cell<br />

infiltration and vacuolar not obvious, but also little hepatocyte<br />

necrosis or apoptosis was found (Fig. 4(F)), suggesting that oat<br />

vinegar of the medium group significantly ameliorated the liver<br />

injuries induced by 60 Co γ -irradiation. Exposure of cells to ionizing<br />

radiation could lead to an increase in ROS, including hydroxyl<br />

radicals (OH ·), superoxide anions (O2 − ), singlet oxygen ( 1 O2)<br />

and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). 34 Our experiment showed that<br />

oat vinegar has obvious radical scavenging activity in vitro and<br />

the ability to promote antioxidant activity of SOD or GSH-PX<br />

in vivo. Compared with the result of the blank group, oat vinegar<br />

also restored antioxidant enzymes like SOD and GSH-PX to<br />

near-normal levels. Thus oat vinegar can attenuate oxidative<br />

damage in liver and exhibit antioxidant activities in aging mice.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

In summary, the evidentantioxidantactivities of oatvinegar in vitro<br />

were confirmed by high ABTS radical scavenging activity, stronger<br />

reducing power and the inhibitory capacity of lipid peroxidation.<br />

Ethyl acetate extract of oat vinegar contained more varieties<br />

of phenolic acids and showed stronger antioxidant activity<br />

than ethanol and water extracts. Three kinds of extracts of oat<br />

vinegar included major antioxidant compounds. Protocatechuic<br />

acid in extracts of oat vinegar was 2–20 times higher than<br />

other phenolic acids. Oat vinegar increased SOD and GSH-PX<br />

activities, while decreasing the MDA content in aging mice. Results<br />

suggested that oat vinegar at a medium dose of 3.0 mL kg −1 b.w.<br />

had the strongest antioxidant activity. Also, histopathological<br />

assessment suggested that oat vinegar significantly ameliorated<br />

the liver injuries induced by 60 Co γ -irradiation because less<br />

cell infiltration and vacuolar degeneration were observed, and<br />

hepatocyte necrosis or apoptosis was rarely found when aging<br />

mice were administered suitable oat vinegar. Further studies on<br />

the identification and purification of other components, besides<br />

phenolic acid, responsible for the antioxidant activities in oat<br />

vinegar are now in progress.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

This study was supported by nyhyzx07-009 (public industry project<br />

of the Ministry of Agriculture) and nycytx07-14 (the earmarked<br />

fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology <strong>Research</strong> System).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1 Bissel DM, Gores GJ, Laskin DL and Hoorhagle JH, Drug-induced liver<br />

injury: mechanisms and test systems. Hepatology 33:1009–1013<br />

(2001).<br />

2 Albano E, Free radical mechanisms in immune reactions associated<br />

with alcoholic liver disease. Free Radic Biol Med 32:110–114 (2002).<br />

3 Tsujihata S, Entani E, Asai M, Tsukamoto Y and Ohta M, Mathematical<br />

modeling to predict the bactericidal effect of processed vinegar on<br />

Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int J Food Microbiol 43:135–138 (1998).<br />

4 Fushimi T, Tayama K, Fukaya M, Kitakoshi K, Nakai N, et al, Acetic acid<br />

feeding enhances glycogen repletion in liver and skeletal muscle of<br />

rats. JNutr131:1973–1977 (2001).<br />

5 Liljeberg H and Bjorck I, Delayed gastric emptying rate may explain<br />

improved glycaemia in healthy subjects to a starchy meal with<br />

added vinegar. Eur J Nutr 52:368–371 (1998).<br />

6 Kondo S, Tayama K, Tsukamoto Y, Ikeda K and Yamori Y,<br />

Antihypertensive effects of acetic acid and vinegar on<br />

spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem<br />

65:2690–2694 (2001).<br />

7 Shimoji Y, Tamura Y, Nakamura Y, Nanda K, Nishidai S, Nishikawa Y,<br />

et al, Isolation and identification of DPPH radical scavenging<br />

compounds in Kurosu (Japanese unpolished rice vinegar). JAgric<br />

Food Chem 50:6501–6503 (2002).<br />

8 Alonso AM, Castro R, Rodriguez MC, Guillen DA and Barroso CG, Study<br />

of the antioxidant power of brandies and vinegars derived from<br />

sherry wines and correlation with their content in polyphenols.<br />

Food Res Int 37:715–721 (2004).<br />

9 Verzelloni E, Tagliazucchib D and Conte A, Relationship between the<br />

antioxidant properties and the phenolic and flavonoid content in<br />

traditional balsamic vinegar. Food Chem 105:564–571 (2007).<br />

10 Xu QP, Tao W and Ao Z, Analysis of the source of antioxidant<br />

compounds in Zhenjiang vinegar. Food Ferment Ind 31:33–36<br />

(2005).<br />

11 Peterson DM, Oat antioxidants. J Cereal Sci 33:115–129 (2001).<br />

12 Is Fardet A, Rock E and Remesy C, The in vitro antioxidant potential<br />

of whole-grain cereals and cereal products well reflected in vivo?<br />

J Cereal Sci 48:258–276 (2008).<br />

13 Peterson DM, Emmons CL and Hibbs AH, Phenolic antioxidants and<br />

antioxidant activity in pearling fractions of oat groats. J Cereal Sci<br />

33:97–103 (2001).<br />

14 Zhishen J, Mengeheng T and Jianming W, The determination of<br />

flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on<br />

superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64:555–559 (1999).<br />

15 Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M and Rice-Evans C,<br />

Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation<br />

decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237 (1999).<br />

16 Amarowicz R, Pegg RB, Rahimi-Moghaddam P, Barl B and Weil JA,<br />

Free-radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of<br />

selected plant species from the Canadian prairies. Food Chem<br />

84:551–562 (2004).<br />

17 Zin ZM,Abdul-Hamid AandOsman A,Antioxidativeactivityofextracts<br />

from Mengkudu (Morinda citrifolia L.) root, fruit and leaf. Food Chem<br />

78:227–231 (2002).<br />

18 Tian S, Nakamura K and Kayahara H, Analysis of phenolic compounds<br />

in white rice, brown rice and germinated brown rice. J Agric Food<br />

Chem 52:4808–4813 (2004).<br />

19 Esterbauer H and Cheeseman KH, Determination of aldehydic lipid<br />

peroxidation products: malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal.<br />

Meth Enzymol 186:407–421 (1990).<br />

J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958 c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa<br />

1957


1958<br />

20 Oyanagui Y, Reevaluation of assay methods and establishment of<br />

kit for superoxide dismutase activity. Anal Biochem 142:290–296<br />

(1984).<br />

21 Paglia DE and Valentine WNJ, Studies on the quantitative and<br />

qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase.<br />

J Lab Clin Med 70:158–169 (1967).<br />

22 Peterson DM, Hahn MJ and Emmons CL, Oat avenanthramides exhibit<br />

antioxidant activities in vitro. Food Chem 79:473–478 (2002).<br />

23 Wang D, Wang LJ, Zhu FX, Zhu JY, Chen XD, Zou L, et al, In vitro and<br />

in vivo studies on the antioxidant activities of the aqueous extracts<br />

of Douchi (a traditional Chinese salt-fermented soybean food). Food<br />

Chem 107:1421–1428 (2008).<br />

24 Chou ST, Chao WW and Chung YC, Antioxidative activity and safety of<br />

50% ethanolic red bean extract (Phaseolus radiatus L. var. Aurea).<br />

J Food Sci 68:21–25 (2003).<br />

25 Rumbaoa RGO, Cornago DF and Geronimo IM, Phenolic content and<br />

antioxidant capacity of Philippine sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas)<br />

varieties. Food Chem 113:1133–1138 (2009).<br />

26 Stalikas CD,Extraction,separation and detection methods forphenolic<br />

acids and flavonoids. JSepSci30:3268–3295 (2007).<br />

27 Mikulajova A, Takacsova M, Rapta P, Brindzova L, Zalibera M and<br />

Nemeth K, Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of<br />

cereal and pseudocereal genotypes. J Food Nutr Res 46:50–157<br />

(2007).<br />

28 Cerezo AB, Tesfaye W, Torija MJ, Mateo E, Garcia-Parrilla MC and<br />

Troncoso AM, The phenolic composition of red wine vinegar<br />

produced in barrels made from different woods. Food Chem<br />

109:606–615 (2008).<br />

www.soci.org J Qiu et al.<br />

29 Lopez F, Pescador P, Guell C, Morales ML, Garcia-parrilla MC and<br />

Troncoso AM, Industrial vinegar clarification by cross-flow<br />

microfiltration effect on colour and polyphenol content. J Food<br />

Eng 68:133–136 (2005).<br />

30 Cerezo AB, Tesfaye W, Soria-Diaz ME, Torija MJ, Mateo E, Garcia-<br />

Parrilla MC, et al, Effect of wood on the phenolic profile and sensory<br />

properties of wine vinegars during ageing. J Food Compos Anal<br />

23:175–184 (2010).<br />

31 Chung HC, Kim SE, Lee MG, Cho CK, Kim TH, Lee DH, et al,<br />

Mitochondrial dysfunction by γ -irradiation accompanies the<br />

induction of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) in rat liver. Toxicology<br />

161:79–91 (2001).<br />

32 WenCY,ItoM,MatsuuM,FukudaE,ShichijoK,NakashimaM,et al,<br />

Mechanism of the antiulcerogenic effect of IL-11 on acetic acidinduced<br />

gastric ulcer in rats. Life Sci 70:2997–3005 (2002).<br />

33 Ashizuka S, Ishikawa N, Kato J, Yamaga J, Inatsu H, Eto T, et al, Effect<br />

of adrenomedullin administration on acetic acid-induced colitis in<br />

rats. Peptides 26:2610–2615 (2005).<br />

34 Li CR, Zhou Z, Zhu D, Sun YN, Dai JM and Wang SQ, Protective effect<br />

of paeoniflorin on irradiation-induced cell damage involved in<br />

modulation of reactive oxygen species and the mitogen-activated<br />

protein kinases. Int J Biochem Cell B 39:426–438 (2007).<br />

35 Andreucetti NA, Sarmoria C, Curzio OA and Valles EM, Effect of the<br />

phenolic antioxidants on the structure of gamma-irradiated model<br />

polyethylene. Radiat Phys Chem 52:177–182 (1998).<br />

www.interscience.wiley.com/jsfa c○ 2010 Society of Chemical Industry J Sci Food Agric 2010; 90: 1951–1958

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!