2011 Annual Report - St John's in the City
2011 Annual Report - St John's in the City
2011 Annual Report - St John's in the City
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
34<br />
Sunday morn<strong>in</strong>g, do <strong>the</strong>y f<strong>in</strong>d us modern, funny,<br />
edgy, ground-break<strong>in</strong>g, lively and more?<br />
Our slogan “More than you might expect” is not<br />
unique; it is <strong>the</strong> same slogan as <strong>the</strong> city of Hamilton.<br />
Are we more than <strong>the</strong> new comer would expect? If<br />
we are not, we could be wast<strong>in</strong>g our communications<br />
money and mislead<strong>in</strong>g people. Last year we<br />
mimicked Tui’s campaign of “Let’s be honest”.<br />
Would our signs be more honest if, like <strong>St</strong> Peter’s,<br />
we had more traditional signs tell<strong>in</strong>g what we do <strong>in</strong><br />
our church community? For example <strong>St</strong> Peter’s had<br />
a sign shaped like a temperature gauge <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g<br />
people how <strong>the</strong>y were go<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> fundrais<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir organ refurbishment. This creates an accurate<br />
impression of what you’d f<strong>in</strong>d if you came <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />
church.<br />
In contrast our sign “Blessed are <strong>the</strong> meek for <strong>the</strong>y<br />
shalt <strong>in</strong>herit Aotearoa” took a social justice angle. It<br />
took a huge number of hours to develop, engaged<br />
many op<strong>in</strong>ions and, after changes and two debates,<br />
was narrowly approved by <strong>the</strong> <strong>St</strong> John’s Council. We<br />
had some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g feedback from people outside<br />
<strong>the</strong> church. A Well<strong>in</strong>gton Presbytery m<strong>in</strong>ister commented<br />
that we were “talk<strong>in</strong>g to ourselves, but <strong>in</strong><br />
public”. We had criticism and worry from with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
church. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> opportunity it created to engage<br />
with <strong>the</strong> Mana Whenua after church and learn about<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir land would have been too divisive.<br />
The question we need to answer is that, on reflection,<br />
was a seven votes <strong>in</strong> favour and six opposed to<br />
<strong>the</strong> ‘meek’ sign representative enough for it to go up?<br />
Perhaps not. Perhaps we need to reth<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> way<br />
that our committee operates, as we reth<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> vision<br />
of our church?<br />
The Communications Committee has been guided<br />
by <strong>the</strong>se words from our mission statement: “We<br />
are a restless community. Discontent with <strong>the</strong> status<br />
quo… we seek to f<strong>in</strong>d new ways to convey <strong>the</strong> Gospel”.<br />
With this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, we have not repr<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>the</strong><br />
brochure and postcard you’d expect about our build<strong>in</strong>g’s<br />
historic significance. We have tried to embrace<br />
this sense of a church stretch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> mission to new<br />
people, want<strong>in</strong>g to change and <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Is this approach consistent with who we are as a<br />
church, or is it mislead<strong>in</strong>g? Is it time to be more<br />
honest and communicate <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and celebrate it more? Would it be more honest<br />
if we changed our mission statement to “a content<br />
community” or “a community dedicated to tradition,<br />
worship services, and pastoral care of our members”?<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r alternatives we might all agree on could be “a<br />
community dedicated to provid<strong>in</strong>g a peaceful oasis<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst of a concrete jungle” or “come and enjoy<br />
<strong>the</strong> ambiance of this historic place and <strong>the</strong> sounds<br />
of <strong>the</strong> rare historic organ”. My personal experience<br />
of be<strong>in</strong>g on various church committees is that some<br />
of <strong>the</strong>se would better suit <strong>the</strong> majority view than<br />
‘discontent’.<br />
The flames of our burn<strong>in</strong>g bush logo represent us nationally<br />
as people who ask each o<strong>the</strong>r “Wasn’t it like<br />
a fire burn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> us when he talked with us on <strong>the</strong><br />
road?” Is that us? If so, what evidence does <strong>the</strong> newcomer<br />
see of that? Locally our logo is of a build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sh<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g among office build<strong>in</strong>gs. Is that a better fit?<br />
On reflection, I have encouraged <strong>the</strong> committee to<br />
produce signage <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g what <strong>the</strong> church could<br />
become, ra<strong>the</strong>r than what it is. More time and effort<br />
needs to go <strong>in</strong>to agree<strong>in</strong>g that what we convey is<br />
consistent with who we are. Then <strong>the</strong> signage can be<br />
more au<strong>the</strong>ntic.<br />
There is a very good communication plan and policy<br />
written for <strong>the</strong> church. If we decide to try and grow<br />
our church, I believe it would require a skilled dedicated<br />
volunteer, or a part time person – like we have<br />
for property and adm<strong>in</strong>istration – to manage and enact<br />
all <strong>the</strong> aspects of <strong>the</strong> communications plan, which<br />
covers everyth<strong>in</strong>g from how we answer <strong>the</strong> phone<br />
to <strong>the</strong> consistency of our logo specifications and<br />
how we welcome new-comers. I am thankful for <strong>the</strong><br />
considerable skills and experience Elizabeth Gibbs<br />
will br<strong>in</strong>g as our new Convenor. However, until our<br />
vision is clearer and enthusiastically agreed on at a<br />
congregational level, it will be difficult to consistently<br />
communicate our true identity to our neighbours <strong>in</strong><br />
our city.<br />
Ross Davis<br />
Convenor