Barefoot vs. Shod Running - Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Barefoot vs. Shod Results Random Effects Model Effect Size: -1.72 Large Effect Size CI (-3.41, -0.04) Significant Q-Statistic 121.92
Statistics HS vs. NHS running patterns IC-GRF Evaluate for difference between HS and NHS means Secondary Question z-test
Page 1 and 2: Barefoot vs. Shod Running: An Evide
Page 3 and 4: Significance of Problem: Number of
Page 5 and 6: Physical Therapy Relevance: Researc
Page 7 and 8: Theoretical Constructs • Repetiti
Page 9 and 10: Theory behind BF Running • Curren
Page 11 and 12: http://www.ceessentials.net/images/
Page 13 and 14: And Lastly…. It has been proposed
Page 15 and 16: Background • Are running related
Page 17 and 18: Heel Strike (HS) or “Rear Foot St
Page 19 and 20: • Primary: QUESTIONS - While runn
Page 21 and 22: Search Procedures • Databases (nu
Page 23 and 24: Secondary reviewer confirmed that t
Page 25: Effect Size Calculated Statistics B
Page 29 and 30: Results z-test comparing HS and NHS
Page 31 and 32: Discussion 1. Significant heterogen
Page 33 and 34: Discussion BF/Shod Comparison Possi
Page 35 and 36: Discussion BF/Shod Comparison Possi
Page 37 and 38: Discussion The BF condition & FFS r
Page 39 and 40: Discussion Causes of Decreased IC-G
Page 41 and 42: Change in stride length (Lieberman
Page 43 and 44: Harm and Cost Effects • Not exami
Page 45 and 46: Shoes for forefoot strike? • Vibr
Page 47 and 48: Limitations • Heterogeneous studi
Page 49 and 50: Directions for Further Research •
Page 51 and 52: Primary References 1. Baur H, Diver
Page 53 and 54: Secondary References • Fitzgerald
Page 55 and 56: Secondary References • Sangha O.,
Page 57: Videos if Time Allows • Barefoot

Barefoot vs. Shod Running - Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?