02.02.2013 Views

From Exodus to Exitus Causes of post-war violence in El ... - eDoc

From Exodus to Exitus Causes of post-war violence in El ... - eDoc

From Exodus to Exitus Causes of post-war violence in El ... - eDoc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Heidrun Z<strong>in</strong>ecker<br />

Figure 3: (Deported) Central American residents <strong>in</strong> (from) the USA (2004)<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> residents<br />

<strong>in</strong> the USA<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

population<br />

Central American<br />

residents deported<br />

from the USA<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

population<br />

Source: Rocha 2006: 47<br />

Salvadorans Guatemalans Hondurans Nicaraguans<br />

1,201,002 698,745 407,994 248,725<br />

17.77 5.64 5.68 4.62<br />

56,076 39,669 63,639 50,26<br />

0.82 0.32 0.88 0.09<br />

Step 2: The particularly high value <strong>of</strong> remittances with<strong>in</strong> the (socio)economic<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>El</strong> Salvador and its implications for the loss <strong>of</strong> importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> local production and labour<br />

Salvadoran emigrants send remittances <strong>to</strong> 22 % <strong>of</strong> households <strong>in</strong> <strong>El</strong> Salvador. Of these,<br />

40 % <strong>of</strong> households are supported by their relations with migrants. It is particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>to</strong> observe the transformation <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> remittances with<strong>in</strong> foreign currency<br />

<strong>in</strong>flow. 8 In Figure 4, each section <strong>of</strong> both bars which represents the remittances is filled <strong>in</strong><br />

black; the difference <strong>in</strong> length <strong>to</strong> the other sections <strong>of</strong> bars <strong>in</strong> 2004, but also <strong>to</strong> the same<br />

section <strong>in</strong> 1978, is enormous:<br />

Figure 4: Transformation <strong>in</strong> foreign currency <strong>in</strong>flow <strong>to</strong> <strong>El</strong> Salvador <strong>in</strong> %<br />

1978<br />

2004<br />

5<br />

81<br />

70<br />

Traditional agrarian export Remittances Maquila Non-traditional export, outside Central America<br />

Source: PNUD 2005 c: 7.<br />

The figure illustrates that <strong>in</strong> Salvadoran foreign trade between 1978, when the homicide<br />

rate was still relatively low, and 2004, by which time it was high, a complete turnaround<br />

has taken place <strong>in</strong> the relation between traditional agrarian export and remittances.<br />

With remittances, 70 % <strong>of</strong> foreign currency <strong>in</strong>flow is now acquired abroad. If you<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude the 12 % <strong>of</strong> the maquila, which is local with regard <strong>to</strong> labour, but not <strong>to</strong> capital,<br />

then 82 % <strong>of</strong> foreign currency <strong>in</strong>flow does not come from the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> local labour<br />

8 Foreign currency <strong>in</strong>flow comes from net export, direct <strong>in</strong>vestments, portfolio <strong>in</strong>vestments, development aid<br />

and loans. Debt service must be subtracted. Not all foreign currency <strong>in</strong>flow is therefore rents.<br />

12<br />

8<br />

3<br />

13<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!