05.02.2013 Views

Global Life Sciences Cluster Report 2011 - Jones Lang LaSalle

Global Life Sciences Cluster Report 2011 - Jones Lang LaSalle

Global Life Sciences Cluster Report 2011 - Jones Lang LaSalle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

India ranked third for inward direct investment flows. Between<br />

2003 and 2006, just over $12 billion was invested (a figure<br />

approximately five times the global average) and between<br />

2007 and 2010, just under $17 billion was invested (a figure<br />

presenting more than 5.5 times the global average). India’s<br />

growth over the first period was more than 100 percent, yet like<br />

other countries impacted by the global economic recession,<br />

India saw a decline in year-to-year investment levels between<br />

2007 and 2010. Some 47 percent of investment in India went<br />

for R&D, one of the best research investment performances<br />

by any of the top FDI nations.<br />

Investment levels declined significantly outside of the top three<br />

Asian countries. Even while some of the countries put up very<br />

sizable percentage growth figures, the absolute dollar value<br />

of the inward flows was a fraction of the top three countries.<br />

(Reference, figure 8)<br />

Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA)<br />

Ten countries in the EMEA region received significant investments<br />

in the drug and pharmaceutical sector. EMEA countries<br />

also generally received a larger percentage of R&D investment<br />

than those of countries in other regions.<br />

Ireland was the largest recipient of inward direct investment in<br />

the region, receiving more than $50 billion from 2003 to 2010.<br />

From 2003 to 2006, Ireland received just over $37 billion in<br />

inward flows (approximately 14 times the global average), and<br />

between 2007 and 2010, just under $16 billion (approximately 5<br />

11 The drug and pharmaceuticals global direct investment landscape | <strong>Jones</strong> <strong>Lang</strong> <strong>LaSalle</strong><br />

times the global average). Direct investment in manufacturing<br />

facilities represented close to 90 percent of all investment in<br />

the country, probably because of related tax incentives.<br />

Germany was the second largest recipient in the region with<br />

more than $25 billion in inward investment between 2003 and<br />

2010. Like Ireland, Germany also received more investment<br />

between 2003 and 2006 than between 2007 and 2010, but when<br />

viewed from a global perspective, Germany received just over<br />

five times the global average between 2003 and 2006 and just<br />

under four times the global average between 2007 and 2010.<br />

Most investment in Germany was in the manufacturing sector.<br />

France was third in the region for inward investment flows,<br />

receiving just under $23 billion between 2003 and 2010.<br />

Between 2003 and 2006, France received just over $14 billion<br />

in inward investment, a figure just over five times the global<br />

average, and approximately $8.5 billion between 2007 and<br />

2010, a figure 2.75 times the global average. R&D investment<br />

represented just over 30 percent of total investment in France.<br />

Spain and Italy rounded out the top five destinations for direct<br />

investment in Europe. Spain received a significant amount of<br />

inward investment between 2003 and 2006, but slowed notably<br />

after 2006. Italy was the opposite.<br />

Other countries of significance in EMEA included the United<br />

Kingdom, Russia, Belgium, Switzerland and Sweden. While<br />

seeing lower levels of investment than the top five, each still<br />

received notable investment at levels generally above the<br />

global average. Of this group of countries, at more than 30<br />

percent, the United Kingdom, Belgium and Sweden all stood<br />

out in terms of the total investment represented by R&D.<br />

As a general rule, investment in the Middle East and Africa<br />

remains very low relative to other countries in the region.<br />

(Reference, figure 9)<br />

2%<br />

10% 1%<br />

76%<br />

Tof C<br />

9% 1%<br />

63%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!