13.02.2013 Views

Technical and Research Bulletin 3-51 - Amazon Web Services

Technical and Research Bulletin 3-51 - Amazon Web Services

Technical and Research Bulletin 3-51 - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Practices <strong>and</strong> Procedures for the Alignment of Marine<br />

Main Propulsion Shafting Systems<br />

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION<br />

1.1 INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITION OF PROPULSION SHAFTING SYSTEM<br />

ALIGNMENT<br />

Common sense suggests that the bearings supporting marine propulsion shafting be aligned<br />

so they hold the shaft in a straight line, since offsetting one bearing with respect to another<br />

would bend the shaft. Moreover, industrial machinery is typically aligned so that the shafts<br />

of the driving <strong>and</strong> driven machines are collinear [1]. However, this approach is not always<br />

appropriate for marine main propulsion shafting because: a) its bearings move as conditions<br />

change, <strong>and</strong> b) the shafting is never really straight because it deflects under its own weight<br />

<strong>and</strong> the weight of the propeller <strong>and</strong> other attached components. Therefore, the vertical <strong>and</strong><br />

athwartships position of the bearings must be aligned so that the limits established to ensure<br />

proper system operation are not exceeded for all normal ship operating conditions. It follows<br />

that shaft alignment could also be called bearing alignment, since the alignment is a direct<br />

result of the position of bearings that support the shafts.<br />

1.2 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE<br />

In the early 1960s, it was discovered that serious misalignment of propulsion shafting caused<br />

gear skew on large, steam turbine bull gears, which in turn initiated pitting on the second<br />

reduction gear teeth. At that time shafting systems usually had too many bearings, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

straight-line alignment was considered to be a good alignment. However, the straight-line<br />

alignment tended to place a large amount of the attached line shaft weight on the aft bull gear<br />

bearing in the cold condition. Then, as the gear heated up, even more shafting weight shifted<br />

onto this bearing, while the forward gear bearing became more unloaded. This unequal<br />

loading of the gear bearings caused gear skew. Computerized shafting analysis was used to<br />

“misalign” the bull gear in the cold condition relative to the propulsion shafting, so that in the<br />

hot condition the vertical loads on the two bull gear bearings would be equal within an<br />

acceptable limit. The SNAME paper “Coordinated Alignment of Line Shaft, Propulsion<br />

Gear <strong>and</strong> Turbines”, by Andersen <strong>and</strong> Zrodowski [2] firmly established the relationship<br />

between shaft misalignment <strong>and</strong> gear problems <strong>and</strong> offered practical solutions.<br />

As a result of information accumulated since then, today’s shipbuilders produce vessels with<br />

practically no built-in propulsion shafting alignment problems. Nonetheless, alignment<br />

problems still occur <strong>and</strong> propulsion shaft alignment remains a challenging task for both<br />

shipyards <strong>and</strong> designers. Some of these alignment problems are caused by: a) worn or failed<br />

bearings, b) extensive hull damage which may have disturbed the bearing settings, <strong>and</strong> c)<br />

improperly bored stern tubes.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!