14.02.2013 Views

H2U Vol 7 Issue 3 Jan 2008.pub - Highcliffe School

H2U Vol 7 Issue 3 Jan 2008.pub - Highcliffe School

H2U Vol 7 Issue 3 Jan 2008.pub - Highcliffe School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enterprise Challenge cup.<br />

You can read about their<br />

experience at the Regional<br />

finals in the box.<br />

Year 9 Geography and<br />

Social Enterprise<br />

Last term Year 9 Geography<br />

students learned about<br />

Development. Covering<br />

the differences between<br />

MEDCs and LEDCs – or<br />

More Economically Developed<br />

Countries and Less<br />

Economically Developed<br />

Countries. We also looked<br />

at the difference between<br />

relative and absolute poverty,<br />

the benefits of world<br />

trade and problems of<br />

globalisation, and the reasons<br />

behind the trade gap<br />

between poor and rich<br />

countries.<br />

The unit also studied the<br />

Millennium Development<br />

Goals set in the year 2000<br />

by nearly 200 countries<br />

round the world in an effort<br />

to make the world a better<br />

place. Year 9’s looked at<br />

the progress and limits being<br />

made regarding issues<br />

such as infant mortality, literacy<br />

rates, maternal health<br />

and<br />

combatingseriousdiseases<br />

such<br />

as<br />

HIV<br />

and<br />

malaria.<br />

The Trading Game was a<br />

way to reflect on the unit as<br />

a whole and coincided with<br />

Enterprise Week – with a focus<br />

on Social Enterprise.<br />

The world economy is a<br />

hugely complicated balancing<br />

act, controlling more or<br />

else everything in the<br />

world. A system where<br />

making the right decision<br />

means the difference between<br />

financial security or<br />

misery for millions. The<br />

aim was to<br />

highlight how<br />

some countries<br />

will remain<br />

poor if<br />

the richer<br />

countries do<br />

not take<br />

some responsibility<br />

to<br />

make<br />

changes for<br />

humanitarian<br />

reasons rather than ones<br />

based on profit.<br />

The Trading Game<br />

The aim of the game is to<br />

make money by producing,<br />

Trading Game—Student Responses<br />

‘By playing the Trading Game I learnt a lot about how countries have to<br />

struggle on what the resources they have. I noticed that many of the<br />

countries were deprived of the basic needs to make the shapes. The<br />

Game was trying to show us how hard it was for some countries to get by<br />

with what they had. The team I was with was Malaysia and all we had to<br />

start off with was paper and £200. We traded our paper and money for<br />

resources. The changes to the value of shapes was annoying at times and<br />

we were not very successful, the highest amount of money we cashed in<br />

was £300, but by the end we only had £100 due to being fined.‘<br />

By Kathryn Marks<br />

‘The Trading Game was a fun yet educational activity which taught us<br />

about the world’s economic system but in an interesting way. I was in<br />

the winning team of Tanzania. We were quite a poor country and we only<br />

started with one pencil, one piece of paper and £200. We had to trade<br />

what little we had to get the right equipment to make the various shapes<br />

and then cash them in at the World Bank. We were good at trading with<br />

other countries and we managed to get our country out of poverty and<br />

further up the economic system.’<br />

By Lewis Payne<br />

Page 6 <strong>H2U</strong>, <strong>Vol</strong> 7 <strong>Issue</strong> 3 - <strong>Jan</strong>uary 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!