La ley de Okun en el Perú - Pontificia universidad cat&oacutelica del ...

Sample: 1990 1999Included observations: 10Series: LPEAO LPIBTLMLags interval: 1 to 1Data Trend: None None Linear Linear QuadraticRank or No Intercept Intercept Intercept Intercept InterceptNo. of CEs No Trend No Trend No Trend Trend TrendSelected (5% level) Number of Cointegrating Relations by Model (columns)Trace 2 1 0 0 2Max-Eig 2 1 0 0 02. LPEAO y LPBINPLMEn ambos casos no se puede encontrar un vector de cointegración, tanto con un rezago como condos.Sample: 1970 1999Included observations: 28Series: LPEAO LPIBNPLMLags interval: 1 to 1Data Trend: None None Linear Linear QuadraticRank or No Intercept Intercept Intercept Intercept InterceptNo. of CEs No Trend No Trend No Trend Trend TrendSelected (5% level) Number of Cointegrating Relations by Model (columns)Trace 0 0 0 0 0Max-Eig 0 0 0 0 0Sample: 1970 1999Included observations: 27Series: LPEAO LPIBNPLMLags interval: 1 to 2Data Trend: None None Linear Linear QuadraticRank or No Intercept Intercept Intercept Intercept InterceptNo. of CEs No Trend No Trend No Trend Trend TrendSelected (5% level) Number of Cointegrating Relations by Model (columns)Trace 0 0 0 0 0Max-Eig 0 0 0 0 035