bulletin n° 224 - fig media

FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE
FÉDÉRATION INTERNATIONALE DE GYMNASTIQUE
Rhythmic’s Technical Committee
Kiev (UKR), September 15-20, 2012
Participants:
President: Maria Szyszkowska (POL)
MINUTES (summary)
Vice-Presidents: Nataliya Kuzmina (RUS); Shihoko Sekita (JPN)
Members: Maria Gigova (BUL); Noha Abou shabana (EGY);
Apologies Daniela Delle Chiaie (ITA); Caroline Hunt (USA); Vera
Sesina (Athlete Representative)
1. General Information:
a) New dates of World Championships held in Ukraine – Kiev from 26 August till 5
September 2013 accepted.
b) Correspondence between FIG General Secretary and RG TC President dated 12
September 2012 for approval of 2013 – 2016 Code of Points. President has accepted
propositions of FIG without further discussions as COP has to be approved immediately
and published (since there is only 2 months left for intercontinental judges course)
c) TC must prepare presentations of the course/questions according to the final approved
version.
2. Agenda approved
3. Approval of Venice April 2012 Minutes and London August 2012 Minutes.
4. President’s Report
o Detailed Report of London Olympic Games 2012
5. Report from World Cup Competitions 2012:
o Penza World Cup: Experienced professional organization.
o Pesaro World Cup and Sofia World Cup: the majority of TC members were present
during the event and by analyzing the reported excellent organization in both events.
During the Sofia World Cup, TC had the chance to arrange a supplementary meeting to
analyze federation comments and modify COP. Updated version was sent immediately
to FIG office.
o Corbeil Essones World Cup: Perfect organization; It is desired to have carpets with
podium in the training hall.
o Tashkent World Cup: Very Professional Organization.
o Minsk World Cup: Perfect organization with very high level of Performance of gymnasts
before OG. Mrs. Irina Leperaskya was very active and arranged everything
professionally.
6. Analysis of Judgment: London Olympic Games 2012
Analysis of Fairbrother Judges’ Evaluation documents and TC analysis from London
Both evaluations confirm the overall good work by the judges ; according to Fair
brother
analysis; three judges have received “Excellent” in all parts of the competitions
MLEJNKOVA Blanka (CZE), MACKONIENE Sigita (LTU), ACOSTA Laura (MEX)
and only one judge has received “Unsatisfactory” from RSA.
76