23.10.2014 Views

Revista Dental Press de

Revista Dental Press de

Revista Dental Press de

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Obtenção <strong>de</strong> enxerto ósseo da região retromolar para reconstrução <strong>de</strong> maxila atrófica<br />

Retromolar region´s bone graft making reconstruction<br />

maxilary’s atrofic<br />

aBStRaCt<br />

With the advent of osseointegrated implants the treatment of total or partial e<strong>de</strong>ntulous individual became<br />

a viable option, and with foreseeable prognostic. In this study, we searched the use of the biometric practice<br />

to evaluate the height and thickness increase with the use of autogenous bone graft, having mandibule’s<br />

posterior region as donor site, with the purpose of a maxilla’s partial reconstruction. For that, 39 individual<br />

submitted to this type of reconstruction integrated the research. The grafted areas were submitted to<br />

biometric analysis, before the graft’s accomplishment and after the graft’s fixation, were obtained that<br />

served to comparison after a period of six to ten months from the accomplished graft, date in which<br />

new measures were taken on the second surgical time (reopening), carrying out an statistical analysis<br />

between the obtained measures, before and after a period inclu<strong>de</strong>d in six to ten months. The biometry<br />

was through measure registrations with manual thickness gauge, below the hexagonal screw’s, and by<br />

photographs registration during and after the measurements. The results allowed evaluating the retromolar<br />

region’s autogenous grafts behavior, showing that a minor resorption difference happened around the<br />

screw. However, there were not problems as for the autogenous bone grafts cicatrization, concluding that<br />

the retromolar region’s bone graft is viable, not compromising the osseointegrated implants installation,<br />

making possible its installations in grafted area.<br />

KEY WORDS: Implants. Osseointegration.<br />

REFERêNCIAS<br />

1. BRANEMARK, P. I.; HALLEN, O.; LINDSTROM, J. et al.<br />

Reconstruction of the <strong>de</strong>fective mandible. Scand. J.<br />

Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Stockholm, v. 9, p. 125-126,<br />

1975.<br />

2. BUSER, D.; RUSKIN, J.; HIGGINBOTTOM, F. et al.<br />

Osseointegration of titanium implants in bone regenerated in<br />

membrane-protected <strong>de</strong>fects: a histologic study in the canine<br />

mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, Lombard, v.<br />

10, no. 6, p. 666-681, Nov./Dec. 1995.<br />

3. ERICSSON, R. A.; ALBREKTSSON, T. Temperature there<br />

Sholp levels for hert – induced bone tissue njury: a vital<br />

microscopic study in the ralbit. J. Prosthet. Dent., St. Louis,<br />

v. 50, no. 1, p. 101-107, July 1983.<br />

4. JENSEN, J.; PEDERSEN, S. S. Autogenous mandibular bone<br />

grafts and osseointegrated implantes for reconstruction of<br />

the severely atrophied maxila: a preliminary report. J. Oral<br />

Maxillofac. Surg., Phila<strong>de</strong>lphia, v. 49, no. 12, p. 1277<br />

-1287, Dec. 1991.<br />

90<br />

Rev. <strong>Dental</strong> <strong>Press</strong> Periodontia Implantol., Maringá, v. 2, n. 1, p. 78-91, jan./fev./mar. 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!