Haryanto F., Fippel M., Bakai A., Nüsslin F., 2001. Study on the Tongue and Grooveeffect of the Elekta Multileaf Collimator using Monte Carlo simulation andfilm dosimetry, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics42,134-136.Hendee W.R., Ibbott G.S., 1996. Radiation Therapy Physics, Mosby, St Louis,MI.Hounsell, A.R., Jordan T. J., 1997. Quality control aspects of the Philips multileafcollimator. Radiotherapy and Oncology 45 p. 225–233.Hug M.S., Das I.J., Steinberg T., Galvin J.M., 2002. A dosimetric comparison ofvarious multileaf collimators, Phys.Med.Biol., 47, p. 159-170.Huq M.S., 2008. A method for evaluating quality assurance needs in radiationtherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 71p.170-173.IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency, 1987. Technical Reports Series No.277Absoırbed Dose Determination in Photon and Electron Beams,Wagramerstrasse, Viena.Inal and I.Akkurt, 2010. Dosimetric verification of calculation and measurements inradiotherapy using IMRT phantom, Scientific Res.and Es.5-10 p. 1213-1215.Johns H.E., Cunningham J.R., 1984. The Physics of Radiology, Thomas, SpringfieldII.Jonathan G., Guanghua Y., Chihray L., 2009. Comparison of two commercialdetector arrays for IMRT quality assurance. Journal of Applied ClinicalMedical Physics, 10 (2) p. 245-254.Jordan T., Williams P., 1994. The design and performance characteristics of amultileaf collimator. Physics in Medicine and Biology 39, p. 231-251.97
Jursinic, P. A., 2001. Implementation of an in vivo diode dosimetry program andchanges in diode characteristics over a 4-year clinical history. MedicalPhysics 28(8), p. 1718-1726Khan F., Gibbon J.P., Roback D., 1996. Collimator (Head) Scatter at ExtendedDistances in Linear Accelerator-generated photon beams. Int. J. RadiationOncology Biology and Physics, Vol. 35 (3) p. 605-608Khan, F., 2003. The Physics of Radiation Therapy, Lippincott, Williams andWilkins, Baltimore, MD.Klein E., Low D., 2001. Interleaf leakage for 5 and 10 mm dynamic multileafcollimation systems incorporating patient motion. Medcal Physics, 28,p.1703–1710.Helen L., Mackie T., McCullough E., 1997. A dual source photon beam model usedin convolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical megavoltage x-raybeams. Medical Physics, 24(12).Liu H., Mackie R., McCullough E., 1997. A dual source photon beam model used inconvolution/superposition dose calculations for clinical megavoltage x-raybeams. Medical Physics, 24(12), p. 1969-1974.Low J., Sohn E., Klein J., Markman S., Dempsey J. F., 2001. Characterization of acommercial multileaf collimator used for intensity modulated radiationtherapy. Medical Physics, 28, p. 752–756.LoSasso C., Chui S., Ling C. C., 1998. Physical and dosimetric aspects of a multileafcollimation system used in the dynamic mode for implementing intensitymodulated radiotherapy. Medical Physics, 25, p.1919–1927.LoSasso T., Chui C., Clifton C., 2001. Comprehensive quality assurance for thedelivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator usedin the dynamic mode. Medical Physics, 28 (11), p.2209-2219.98
- Page 6:
ÖZETDoktora TeziYÜKSEK ENERJİLİ
- Page 10 and 11:
ġekil 3.6. Tedavi cihazındaki iyo
- Page 12 and 13:
ġekil 4.41. Tüm segmentlerin Matr
- Page 14 and 15:
SİMGELER ve KISALTMALAR DİZİNİA
- Page 16 and 17:
1. GİRİŞRadyoterapi, radyoaktif
- Page 18 and 19:
Bu fonksiyonlar, genellikle doku e
- Page 20 and 21:
cm 2 ‟den daha küçük alanlar i
- Page 22 and 23:
aĢlığı tamamen alan içinde kal
- Page 24 and 25:
Burada, D Q ve Ď Q , ġekil 1.4. d
- Page 26 and 27:
Sudaki derinlikġekil 1.5. ÇeĢitl
- Page 28 and 29:
Megavoltaj X ıĢını profilleri,
- Page 30 and 31:
Düz fantom yüzeyi Fantoma dik ı
- Page 32 and 33:
yapılmıĢtır. Ardından, tümör
- Page 34 and 35:
Açık alan kolimatör saçılma fa
- Page 36 and 37:
hızlandırıcıdaki, target, prime
- Page 40 and 41:
Jordan ve Williams 1994 yılında y
- Page 42 and 43:
ve geçirgenliği olarak sıralanm
- Page 44 and 45:
hassasiyet, iyi uzaysal rezülasyon
- Page 46 and 47:
Ceylan ve ekibi tarafından 2009 y
- Page 48 and 49:
nedeni lineer hızlandırıcıları
- Page 50 and 51:
hasta pozisyonun planlanan ile doğ
- Page 52 and 53:
(a) Su tankı (b) Su taĢıma apara
- Page 54 and 55:
IĢınlama sonunda bir I akımı bi
- Page 56 and 57:
Dosimetry FC65-P, user‟s guide).
- Page 58 and 59:
korunmasını sağlayan emülsiyon
- Page 60 and 61:
Gama matematiksel ( γ) değerlendi
- Page 62 and 63: CtpP 273,16 TP 273,16 T0 (3.7)0Nk
- Page 64 and 65: 3.14. I‟mRT Matrixx Kalibrasyonu
- Page 66 and 67: olarak sudaki doz değiĢimini gör
- Page 68 and 69: KaynakSSD=100cmKatı fantom5cmFilm,
- Page 70 and 71: 11. Küçük alan ölçüm sonuçla
- Page 72 and 73: ġekil 4.3. de ikinci kutu X-Omat V
- Page 74 and 75: ġekil 4.5. 6 MV için TPS‟e akta
- Page 76 and 77: göre Matrixx, film ve iyon odası
- Page 78 and 79: ġekil 4.12. T4A, Matrixx ile MLC g
- Page 80 and 81: 4.3.6. Ölçüm T6ABirbirine bitiĢ
- Page 82 and 83: Matrixx7A1Matrixx7A3Gama değerlend
- Page 84 and 85: G=90˚ iken üzerinde iĢaretlemele
- Page 86 and 87: tekrarlandı. MLC‟lerin her sefer
- Page 88 and 89: 4.3.13. Ölçüm T1BPenumbra modell
- Page 90 and 91: ġekil 4.35. T3B, TPS - Film karĢ
- Page 92 and 93: yüzde fark ve gama değerlendirmes
- Page 94 and 95: 4.3.21. Ölçüm T9BSet A düzenlem
- Page 96 and 97: Çizelge 4.4. 20x20 cm 2 alan boyut
- Page 98 and 99: ulundu. Bulunan ortalama verim değ
- Page 100 and 101: Çizelge 4.8. 6 MV Pirinç build-up
- Page 102 and 103: sırasında alınan bu görüntüle
- Page 104 and 105: kolimatör ve ganty açılarında t
- Page 106 and 107: kaynak-detektör mesafesinde, detek
- Page 108 and 109: gerekli kalite kontrol ve kalite te
- Page 110 and 111: Bova F. 1990 A film phantom for rou
- Page 114 and 115: LoSasso T., 2003. Quality assurance
- Page 116 and 117: Williams P.C., 2003., Imrt: deliver
- Page 118 and 119: Ulusal Dergilerde Yayımlanan Çal
- Page 120 and 121: 2. Orhun H., Dirican B., Tunçel N.
- Page 122 and 123: 17. Tunçel N., Toy A., Kızıldağ
- Page 124 and 125: 35. Tunçel N., Ġnal A., Dündar E