AR 2010/1 - Fakulteta za arhitekturo - Univerza v Ljubljani

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Domen Kušar AR 2010/1 Nihanja prostorske predstave študentov arhitekture Viri in literatura Casey, B., in sod. (2008): Use of a storytelling context to improve girls' and boys' geometry skills in kindergarten. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 29. http://pcs. isiknowledge.com/uml/uml . Gilford, J.P., (1996): Personality. McGraw-Hill, New York. Gorska, R., (2005): Modern Research on Spatial Abilities – An Overview and New Results. 11th Scientific and professional Coloquium of CSCGCG: zbornik povzetkov, Varaždinske toplive, 18. – 21. September 2005, Croatian society for geometry and graphics, Zagreb. Juscakova, Z., Gorska, R., (2007): TPS test development and application into research on spatial abilities. Journal for geometry and Graphics, Vol. 11, Nr. 2: 223-237. Kožuh B., (2000): Statistične obdelave v pedagoških raziskavah. Filozofska fakulteta, Ljubljana. Kušar, D., (2004): Prostorska predstava študentov Fakultete za arhitekturo v Ljubljan. V. AR Arhitektura, raziskave: 66-70. Leopold, C., Gorska, R.,A., Sorby, S., A., (2001): International Experiences in Developing the spatial visualisation abilities of engineering students. Journal for geometry and Graphics, Vol. 5, Nr.1: 81-93. Saito, T., Suzuki, K., Jingu, T., (1998): Relations between spatial ability evaluated by a Mental cutting test and engineering graphics education. V: Proceedings 8th international conference on engineering computer graphics and Descriptive geometry, ICGG: 231-235. Schaik, L., (2008): Spatial Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Chichester. Shiina, K., Suzuki, K., (1999): Design of modified mental rotation test and its error analysis. Journal for geometry and Graphics, Vol. 3, Nr. 2: 211-219. Shiina, K., Short, D.R., Miller, C.L., Suzuki, K., (2001): Development of software to record solving process of a mental rotating test. Journal for geometry and Graphics, Vol. 5, Nr. 2: 193-202. Takeyama, K., Maeguchi, R., Chibana, K., Yoshida, K., (1999): Evaluation of Objective test using a pair of irthographic projections for descriptive geometry education. Journal for geometry and Graphics, Vol. 3, Nr.1: 99-111. Tutsumi, E., Schrocker, H., P., Stachel, H., Weiss, G., (2005): Evaluation of students' spatial abilities in Austria and Germany. Journal for geometry and Graphics, Vol. 9, Nr.1: 107-117. doc. dr. Domen Kušar domen.kusar@fa.uni-lj.si UL Fakulteta za arhitekturo 51
Janusz Rębielak Konstrukcijski sistemi za moderne strešne kritine Structural systems for modern roof covers 2010 / 1 AR UDK 72.02 : 692.415 COBISS 1.02 prejeto 16. 4. 2010 izvleček Članek predstavlja morfološke vidike oblikovanja nekaterih konstrukcijskih sistemov, ki jih avtor predlaga za različne tipe streh. Ti sistemi so lahko gospodarne podporne konstrukcije za strehe velikih razponov in obenem omogočajo zanimive arhitektonske oblike. Prikazani so primeri konstrukcijskih oblik izdelanih za potrebe strešnih kritin za prekrivanje koncentričnih oblik tlorisne osnove ter geodetskih kupol. V postopku oblikovanja teh sistemov se uporabljajo moduli v obliki tetrahedrona, ki jih je možno na različne načine razporejati po prostoru ustvarjenega konstrukcijskega sistema. abstract The paper presents the morphological aspects of the shaping of some structural systems proposed by the author for various types of roofs, which can be economical support structures for large span roofs and at the same time may produce interesting architectonic forms. Examples are shown of structural forms designed for the needs of covering spaced over concentric forms of base projections and for geodesic domes. In the process of shaping these systems modules in the form of tetrahedrons are applied, which as repeatable units can be arranged in various ways in the space of the created structural system. ključne besede konstrukcijski sistem, lahka strešna konstrukcija, arhitektonska oblika key words structural system, lightweight roof structure, architectonic form Introduction Material form of an architectonic object is created by means of a structural system. Building technology has been permanently changed along the history of human civilization. On each stage of the development of architecture the right connection between the functional aspects, building structure and artistic form gives in result a building, which may be called a masterpiece of architecture independently of actually obligatory criterions of esthetic evaluations. In some historic ages, like in the gothic architecture, the structural system properly used according to materials common available applied in this time in building construction, played crucial role in shaping of architectonic views of buildings. Similar rules are respected in several architectonic trends have been emerged since beginning of twentieth century. Industrializations and mass production had an important influence on perception of architectonic form of numerous types of buildings. Rapid evolution of building technology and design methods, including computer aided processes of static and dynamic calculations, have opened widely possibilities of creation of amazing architectonic shaped, which were hardly to imagine or simply considered as impossible to build even a short time ago. Many types of modern structural system enable to build objects characterized by great economic, functional and structural efficiency and obtaining unique architectonic views. In the paper are presented selected examples of architectonic projects and structural systems recently worked out by the author. Slika 1: Horizontalni in vertikalni pogled na sferično obliko primerno oblikovane steklene prostorske konstrukcije. Figure 1: Horizontal and vertical views of spherical form of suitably shaped crystal space structure. Structural systems for concentric forms of roof covers Domes or similar roof covers are often spaced over circular or oval form of a base projection. Special type of a spatial frame, 52
Page 1 and 2:
AR 2010/1 Arhitektura, Raziskave Ar
Page 3 and 4:
AR 2010 / 1 AR 2010/1 AR Arhitektur
Page 5 and 6: AR 2010 / 1 Editorial Hello, Reader
Page 7 and 8: AR 2010 / 1
Page 9 and 10: Andrej Kranjc POKRAJINA KRAS - NAŠ
Page 15 and 16: Kaja Pogačar, Metka Sitar TIPOLOGI
Page 23 and 24: Ljudmila Koprivec, Martina Zbašnik
Page 33 and 34: Domen Zupančič Vidoviči in kultu
Page 43 and 44: Lara Slivnik Zgradbe z železno ozi
Page 51 and 52: Domen Kušar Nihanja prostorske pre
Page 53 and 54: Domen Kušar Nihanja prostorske pre
Page 55: Domen Kušar Nihanja prostorske pre
Page 59 and 60: Janusz Rębielak Konstrukcijski sis
Page 61 and 62: AR 2010 / 1
Page 63 and 64: Borut Avtor Juvanec ČLANEK Interdi
Page 65 and 66: Borut Juvanec Interdisciplinarni ce
Page 67 and 68: Borut Juvanec Interdisciplinarni ce
Page 69 and 70: Vojko Kilar UVAJANJE NAPREDNIH TEHN
Page 75 and 76: Tadeja Zupančič Vseživljenjsko i
Page 83 and 84: Domen Zupančič Kamen v Mediteranu
Page 85 and 86: Martina Zbašnik Senegačnik Mednar
Page 87 and 88: AR 2010 / 1
Page 89 and 90: AR 2010 / 1 AR 2010/1 Recenzija pri
Page 91 and 92: AR 2010 / 1 AR 2010/1 Domen Zupanč
Page 93 and 94: AR 2010 / 1 AR 2010/1 S kolegom sva
Page 95 and 96: AR 2010 / 1 AR 2010/1 Lara Slivnik
Page 97 and 98: AR 2010 / 1 AR 2010/1 so proizvajal
Page 99 and 100: AUTHOR GUIDELINES 2010 / 1 AR By su
Page 101 and 102: AR 2010 / 1
show all

AR 2010/1 - Fakulteta za arhitekturo - Univerza v Ljubljani

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?