30.08.2013 Views

Inventering av provtagningsstrategier för jord ... - Naturvårdsverket

Inventering av provtagningsstrategier för jord ... - Naturvårdsverket

Inventering av provtagningsstrategier för jord ... - Naturvårdsverket

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HÅLLBAR SANERING<br />

Rapport 5894 – <strong>Inventering</strong> <strong>av</strong> <strong>provtagningsstrategier</strong> <strong>för</strong> <strong>jord</strong>, grundvatten och porgas<br />

The inventory of the experience based on work done in the USA constitutes a<br />

huge volume in this report. The most distinct differences between Swedish and<br />

USEPA guideline documents is that the American recommendations are of more<br />

stringent and formal character (sampling design is integrated into Data Quality<br />

Objective Process) compared to Swedish references (Quality Manual for Follow-up<br />

Treatment of Contaminated Land and MIFO methodology).<br />

In this report, eight different sampling strategies are summarized along with<br />

their pros and cons and under what circumstances those (strategies) work best. Two<br />

relatively innovative strategies are presented: Ranked set sampling and adaptive<br />

cluster sampling. The main conclusions from the American inventory are:<br />

• Sampling design should be planned parallel with following its contextual<br />

connection with other parts included in a process of environmental<br />

assessment (also risk assessment) of a contaminated site.<br />

• The choice of an appropriate strategy is always site-specific and depends<br />

on the objectives with data collection.<br />

• There is often a need to consider more that only one strategy for a site.<br />

• Collected data and interpretation are always subject to uncertainties –<br />

because data uncertainty influence quality of information used in the<br />

following decision process, they are to be quantified and communicated<br />

to the problem owner/decision maker in a transparent manner.<br />

• In some situations, integration of screening methods and traditional<br />

sampling will result in higher data quality at lower cost compared to<br />

situation where exclusively traditional sampling and laboratory analysis<br />

are applied.<br />

This report also presents short descriptions of PC-platform tools for planning of<br />

sampling design (Visual Sampling Plan) and data analysis, quantification of<br />

uncertainties and visualization (Spatial analysis and Decision Assistance).<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!