13.07.2015 Views

DUGSNyt nr.2 /2013 - Dansk Urogynækologisk Selskab

DUGSNyt nr.2 /2013 - Dansk Urogynækologisk Selskab

DUGSNyt nr.2 /2013 - Dansk Urogynækologisk Selskab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AbstractAf CH Buch; M Glavind-Kristensen;S Axelsen; KM Bek; S GreisenSubjective and objective results of anterior vaginalwall repair A 10-year prospective follow-up study23Objective Abstract AbstractAt follow-up twenty women (50%)To evaluateAf CH Buch;theAf M CHlongGlavind‐Kristensen; Buch;termM Glavind‐Kristensen;outcomeS Axelsen;ofKM S Axelsen; Bek;hadS Greisen KMstageBek; S1,Greisen13 (32%) had stage 2conventional surgical repair of anterior and one (3%) had stage 3 POP. Sixvaginal wall Subjective prolapse. Subjective and objective and objective results women results of anterior (15%) of anterior had vaginal been vaginal wall reoperated repair wall repairA 10-year A 10-year prospective due prospective to follow-up recurrence follow-up study (figure 1). studyMethodsBefore surgery 93% reported bulgesymptoms. Ten years postoperative-From January 1998 until NovemberObjective Objective2000, To 72 evaluate women To the evaluate long were term the operated outcome long term of outcome conventional with of conventional ly, surgical 65% repair had surgical of no anterior repair bulge vaginal of anterior symptoms, wall vaginal prolapse. wall and prolapse.primary anterior vaginal wall repair 20% still had bulge symptoms once ausing local anaesthesia in an outpatientFrom clinic. January At From follow-up 1998 January until November 1998 the until women November 2000, 72 women 2000, ment 72 were women 74% operated were of with operated the primary women with anterior primary consideredvaginal anterior wall vaginal repair wall rmonth or more. In an overall assess-Methods Methodswere using offered local anaesthesia clinical examination, an outpatient and clinic. At follow-up themselves women better were or offered much clinical better examination, after andfilled in a symptom- filled in a and symptom- quality and of life quality questionnaire. of life questionnaire.filled in a and quality of life surgery (figure 2).questionnaire.Results ResultsConclusionsFollow-up was Follow-up 10 years. was Forty 10 years. (56%) Forty women (56%) participated, women participated, (18 (25%) had (18 (25%) died, and had 10 died, (14%) and were 10 (14%) lost to were lostResultsAt 10 year follow-up, 65% was relievedfrom their bulge symptoms, andfollow-up). follow-up). Median age Median was 67 age (37-86) was 67 years, (37-86) median years, BMI median was 26 BMI (19-36). was 26 (19-36).Follow-up was 10 years. Forty (56%)women At baseline, participated, At 72% baseline, had stage 72% (182 had (25%) (POP) stage and 2 had (POP) 28% stage and 74% 28% 3. stage still considered 3. themselves betterdied,Atandfollow-up10At twenty(14%)follow-up womenweretwenty (50%)lostwomen hadto(50%) stagefol-1low-up). Median age was 67 (37-86) ration. However, 15% of the womenhad 13 stage (32%)or much1, had 13 (32%) stagebetter2 had and stagethanone (3%) 2 andbeforehad one stage (3%)the3 had POP.ope-stage Six 3 POP.women (15%) women had (15%) been reoperated had been reoperated due to recurrence due to recurrence (figure 1). (figure 1).years, Before median surgery Before BMI 93% surgery was reported 26 93% bulge (19-36). reported symptoms. bulge symptoms. Ten had years been postoperatively, Ten years reoperated postoperatively, 65% had and no 65% bulge 20% had symptoms, no still bulge symptom andAt 20% baseline, still had 20% bulge still 72% symptoms had bulge had symptoms once stage a month once 2 or a more. month experienced In or an more. overall In assessment an bulge overall symptoms assessment 74% of the 74% women once of the a womenconsidered considered themselves themselves better or much better better or much after better surgery after (figure surgery 2). (figure 2).(POP) and 28% stage 3.month or moreusing local anaesthesia in an outpatient clinic. At follow-up the women were offered clinical examinationFigure 1: Figure Anatomical 1: Anatomical Figure results 1: Anatomical 10 results year10 results year at 10 year Figure Figure 2: Subjective 2: Figure 2: Subjective results at 10 results yearat 10 yearfollow-up follow-up after anterior after follow-up vaginal anterior after wall vaginal anterior repair wall vaginal repair wall follow-up repair follow-up after follow-up after anterior anterior after vaginal anterior wall vaginal repairwall repair5045403530252015105050454035302520151050stage 1 stage stage 2 stage 1 stage 3 reop 2 stage 3 reop706050403020100706050403020100no bulge no bulge bulge reop bulge improved reop improvedConclusions Conclusions26 At 10 year At follow-up, 10 year 65% follow-up, was relieved 65% was from relieved their bulge from their symptoms, bulge symptoms, and 74% still and considered <strong>DUGSNyt</strong> 74% still nr. considered themselves 2 . <strong>2013</strong> themselvebetter or much better better or much than better before than the operation. before the However, operation. 15% However, of the 15% women of the had women been reoperated had been reoperated and 20% and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!