12.11.2012 Aufrufe

Diplom-Lehrgänge - Kapers

Diplom-Lehrgänge - Kapers

Diplom-Lehrgänge - Kapers

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

4<br />

Urs Eicher<br />

President of kapers<br />

For the kapers board<br />

there are questions to<br />

be answered as well.<br />

Why do we face such<br />

a deep ditch between<br />

the board and about<br />

half of the members?<br />

Intercepted on the Home<br />

Stretch….<br />

I cannot get rid of this feeling since the voting about the Profit Participation<br />

Plan!<br />

Why:<br />

• Because for the first time since the grounding<br />

there is money to be distributed;<br />

• Because for the first time we were offered a<br />

Profit Participation Plan that was social politically<br />

convincing, benefitting our salaries, or the<br />

lower salaries in particular, above average;<br />

• Because we would have kept the negotiations<br />

to ease the FDR running despite an agreement<br />

to the PPP;<br />

• Because in February 2009, due to the extension<br />

of the CWA, the salary tables reduced since<br />

2006 would automatically have been raised<br />

again to the level prior to the reduction;<br />

• Because the full cost-of-living-linked salary<br />

adjustment would be less than the Profit Participation<br />

Plan;<br />

• Because the vested rights out of the CWA06<br />

would have been valid for two more years;<br />

• Because the considerably gloomy economic<br />

forecast for 2008 is very unfavourable in terms<br />

of the upcoming CWA negotiations;<br />

• Because a negotiation-break of two years would<br />

have given space for detailed clarifications and<br />

a new or improved planning system (PBS);<br />

• Because time would be badly needed to tackle<br />

the pension fund (2nd pillar) in details and sustainably;<br />

• Because we finally wanted to „ACT“ for the<br />

first time in six years, and not only to „RE-<br />

ACT“.<br />

The new situation – even if it has come off in a<br />

democratic way – throws us back and puts us in a<br />

difficult position by the different results (different<br />

contracts).<br />

We absolutely agree that the flight attendants of<br />

Swiss have contributed to the good result. This<br />

has to be born in mind, at least this year, this is<br />

what we account for.<br />

kabine 4/2007<br />

Furthermore the FDR negotiations have to be<br />

completed and implemented fast. And we will negotiate<br />

a cost-of-living-linked salary adjustment<br />

for the CCM and FCCM.<br />

For the kapers board there are questions to be<br />

answered as well. Why do we face such a deep<br />

ditch between the board and about half of the<br />

members? This calls for an immediate vote of<br />

confidence. The board is going to figure out the<br />

further proceedings in the January policy meeting<br />

and analyse the situation for the second year of<br />

administration.<br />

What we were able to avoid in the last six years<br />

must not happen now by all means: that the kapers-members<br />

are split. We have to overcome this<br />

crisis and we intend to do this in a decent way!<br />

But there is also positive news: The outrageous referendum<br />

in the canton of Zurich to limit aircraft<br />

movements and to extend night ban is off the stove.<br />

The counterproposal – from kapers view - is<br />

not pleasant either, but it allows a hub operation<br />

with a slight possibility of future growth. kapers<br />

as a union fought up front against the exposure of<br />

working positions by this referendum. I recall the<br />

demonstration in front of the Rathaus in February<br />

this year. It was worth the effort.<br />

Kind regards<br />

Urs Eicher<br />

President of kapers

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!