20.02.2013 Views

Atomic Structure Theory

Atomic Structure Theory

Atomic Structure Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 1 Angular Momentum<br />

1.3 Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients<br />

One common problem encountered in atomic physics calculations is finding<br />

eigenstates of the sum of two angular momenta in terms of products of the<br />

individual angular momentum eigenstates. For example, as mentioned in section<br />

(1.2.1), the products Yl,m(θ, φ)χµ are eigenstates of L2 and Lz, aswellas<br />

S2 and Sz. The question addressed in this section is how to combine product<br />

states such as these to find eigenstates of J 2 and Jz, whereJ = L + S.<br />

Generally, let us suppose that we have two commuting angular momentum<br />

vectors J 1 and J 2. Let|j1,m1〉 be an eigenstate of J 2 1 and J1z with eigenvalues<br />

(in units of ¯h) j1(j1 +1) andm1, respectively. Similarly, let |j2,m2〉<br />

be an eigenstate of J 2 2 and J2z with eigenvalues j2(j2 +1) andm2. We set<br />

J = J1 + J2 and attempt to construct eigenstates of J 2 and Jz as linear<br />

combinations of the product states |j1,m1〉|j2,m2〉:<br />

|j, m〉 = <br />

C(j1,j2,j; m1,m2,m)|j1,m1〉|j2,m2〉 . (1.57)<br />

m1,m2<br />

The expansion coefficients C(j1,j2,j; m1,m2,m), called Clebsch-Gordan coefficients,<br />

are discussed in many standard quantum mechanics textbooks<br />

[for example, 34, chap. 10]. One sometimes encounters notation, such as<br />

〈j1,m1,j2,m2|j, m〉 for the Clebsch-Gordan coefficient C(j1,j2,j; m1,m2,m).<br />

Since Jz = J1z + J2z, it follows from (1.57) that<br />

m|j, m〉 = <br />

(m1 + m2)C(j1,j2,j; m1,m2,m)|j1,m1〉|j2,m2〉 . (1.58)<br />

m1,m2<br />

Since the states |j1,m1〉|j2,m2〉 are linearly independent, one concludes from<br />

(1.58) that<br />

(m1 + m2 − m)C(j1,j2,j; m1,m2,m)=0. (1.59)<br />

It follows that the only nonvanishing Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are those<br />

for which m1 + m2 = m. The sum in (1.57) can be expressed, therefore, as<br />

asumoverm2only, the value of m1 being determined by m1 = m − m2.<br />

Consequently, we rewrite (1.57) as<br />

|j, m〉 = <br />

C(j1,j2,j; m − m2,m2,m)|j1,m− m2〉|j2,m2〉 . (1.60)<br />

m2<br />

If we demand that all of the states in (1.60) be normalized, then it follows<br />

from the relation<br />

〈j ′ ,m ′ |j, m〉 = δj ′ jδm ′ m ,<br />

that<br />

<br />

m ′ 2 ,m2<br />

C(j1,j2,j ′ ; m ′ − m ′ 2,m ′ 2,m ′ )C(j1,j2,j; m − m2,m2,m)×<br />

〈j1,m ′ − m ′ 2|j1,m− m2〉〈j2,m ′ 2|j2,m2〉 = δj ′ jδm ′ m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!