23.02.2013 Views

Please - Odhikar

Please - Odhikar

Please - Odhikar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

enforcement personnel is entirely contrary to the universally accepted international human rights<br />

instruments like UDHR, ICCPR, CAT and also to the domestic legal provisions and<br />

constitutional obligations.<br />

Methodology<br />

In the year 2005, <strong>Odhikar</strong> monitored, as per specified plan of action, Motijheel Thana,<br />

Mohammadpur Thana, Tejgaon Tahana under Dhaka Metropolitan City and Fatulla Thana under<br />

Narayanganj District.<br />

<strong>Odhikar</strong>’s focus was to monitor the use of Section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure<br />

(Cr.P.C.) and Section 86 of the Dhaka Metropolitan Police Ordinance. Under Section 54 of the<br />

Cr.P.C., individuals may be arrested on suspicion of criminal activity without order from a<br />

magistrate or a warrant, under several conditions, including ’reasonable suspicion’.<br />

Each month, <strong>Odhikar</strong> fact-finders visited the four targeted police stations five to seven times, in<br />

order to monitor the number of people arrested under the said laws and the various reasons why<br />

police had picked them up.<br />

The following information was collected during each monitoring visit:<br />

* Number and gender of persons arrested<br />

* Number of arrests under Section 54 of the Cr.P.C.<br />

* Number of arrests under Section 86 of the DMP Ordinance<br />

* Number of persons under remand<br />

* Number of arrests under specific cases<br />

* Number of arrests under Section 54 of the Cr.P.C. or Section 86 of the DMP Ordinance<br />

but subsequently shown arrested in other cases<br />

* Number of arrests under the Speedy Trial Act 2002<br />

* Number of arrests under court warrant<br />

* Size of custody room in police station<br />

* Whether any arrested person was kept in police station custody for more than 24 hours<br />

* Whether arrested persons were allowed to contact their relatives and lawyers<br />

* Living environment and cleanliness in the police custody<br />

* Whether information records/registrars are properly maintained in police stations<br />

* Whether special treatment was provided to women and children arrested persons<br />

* Whether there was any complaint/allegation against police officials on duty in police<br />

station<br />

* Allegations of sexual harassment<br />

<strong>Odhikar</strong> sent one fact finder to each of the selected police stations. They interviewed arrested<br />

persons during the monitoring process, both in police station lockup (when permitted to do so)<br />

and upon their release from lock-up or jail, and also interviewed police officers and persons who<br />

had experienced such arrests under the laws in the recent past and were freed on bail.<br />

28<br />

Report 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!