23.02.2013 Views

Please - Odhikar

Please - Odhikar

Please - Odhikar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

violations suffered by thousands of people in two southern insurrections, that lasted between<br />

1987-1990.<br />

Since 1977, neo-liberal and capitalist economic policies have also brought about large-scale<br />

violations of economic, social and cultural rights. Many business enterprises, transnational<br />

corporations and law enforcement authorities are behind such violations. Since about three years<br />

ago, religious tensions have also escalated, resulting in the burning of places of worship and<br />

attempts to restrict freedom of religion through legislature. In the past few years, a High Court<br />

Judge has been killed; staff from the Attorney General's office and National Human Rights<br />

Commission have been harassed and threatened. Lawyers, media personalities and human rights<br />

defenders have also been threatened. In this scenario, how can victims and witnesses- often<br />

ordinary, poor people be assured that know they and their loved ones will be safe?<br />

I would just like to present two case studies here of Mr. Gerald Pereira and Mr. Michael<br />

Anthony Fernando. Police tortured Gerald Pereira in 2002. In 2003, the Sri Lankan Supreme<br />

Court awarded him record damages for this violation of his rights and integrity. On 21st Nov.<br />

2004, Mr. Pereira was shot on his way to work, and died three days later. He was due to testify in<br />

a criminal case against the afore-mentioned policemen on 2nd Dec. 2004.<br />

Mr. Fernando has filed several cases of human rights violations by several prison guards who<br />

had tortured him, while he was in custody after being sentenced to a term of one years<br />

imprisonment on the basis of alleged contempt of court in a highly criticized judgment. After<br />

serving his time in prison, he had received several death threats about which he complained to<br />

the local authorities as well as to the UN Human Rights Committee. On 9 January 2004, the UN<br />

Human Rights Committee, in pursuant of Rule 86 of the Committee's Rules of Procedure, made<br />

a request to the Sri Lankan government to adopt all necessary measures to protect the life, safety<br />

and personal integrity of the author and his family members, so as to avoid irreparable damage<br />

to them. [Untied Nations High Commission for Human Rights Reference: G/SO 215/51 SRI (7)]<br />

However, there was no response from authorities. In February 2004, there were attempts on his<br />

life. Mr. Fernando subsequently left the country, in view of the inability and unwillingness of<br />

authorities to guarantee his security.<br />

Some key issues can be highlighted from these case studies:<br />

� Victims are often threatened-during trial, before trials and even after. Even when the matter<br />

is such that the Attorney General files cases!<br />

� Multiple and continuing victimization-as evident in the above case studies, most victims<br />

end up being continuously victimized-being threatened, abused over and over again.<br />

� In many cases, threats to victims and witnesses target family members- and in many cases,<br />

the lives of family members, including children, are affected by threats, intimidation and<br />

harassment on victims and witnesses.<br />

� Victims and Witnesses are often forced to rely on protection from the perpetrators of human<br />

rights violations. In many instances, perpetrators of human rights violations continue to serve in<br />

the respective areas.<br />

78<br />

Report 2005

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!