Painting Fine-Art Cartoons in Oils - Enchanted Images
Painting Fine-Art Cartoons in Oils - Enchanted Images
Painting Fine-Art Cartoons in Oils - Enchanted Images
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Barks’s cartoon pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
The history of Barks’s work,<br />
both comic-book stories and<br />
oil pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs, is the history of<br />
mak<strong>in</strong>g fantasy <strong>in</strong>to reality.<br />
For Barks’s cartoon<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs “realism” doesn’t<br />
refer to his choice of subject<br />
matter but to specific<br />
techniques for achiev<strong>in</strong>g<br />
authenticity, us<strong>in</strong>g research<br />
and reference material to<br />
correctly render light and<br />
shadow, surface and form.<br />
Look<strong>in</strong>g at the examples<br />
below, it’s obvious that the<br />
duck figure <strong>in</strong> “Oblivious”<br />
is not realistic <strong>in</strong> the same<br />
way “Tundra Swan” is –<br />
the figure <strong>in</strong> “Oblivious”<br />
is a cartoon character, not<br />
a real duck. But the craft<br />
used to create a Barks-style<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g – the render<strong>in</strong>g<br />
techniques – are the same<br />
for both. When Barks first<br />
began to experiment with this<br />
style he said: “I’m go<strong>in</strong>g to do<br />
away with the outl<strong>in</strong>e on the<br />
ducks. They won’t look like<br />
colored cartoons; I’m go<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to see if I can’t make them<br />
look like real, round ducks.’<br />
I wouldn’t draw outl<strong>in</strong>es if<br />
I were pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g a bunch of<br />
sailors; I would draw them<br />
with colors. And I did that<br />
with the ducks” (CBC, 139).<br />
The ducks might be cartoon<br />
characters, but Barks pa<strong>in</strong>ted<br />
them as if they were solid,<br />
three-dimensional be<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ed by light and shadow.<br />
Compare Barks’s pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs to<br />
the Mickey Mouse pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
by Floyd Gottfredson or even<br />
the Uncle Scrooge storybook<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs by Norman<br />
McGary to see the difference<br />
1. 2.<br />
3.<br />
4. 5. 6.<br />
146<br />
Detail from Uncle Scrooge: The Lemonade<br />
K<strong>in</strong>g, by Norman McGary. Barks provided<br />
draw<strong>in</strong>gs for McGary’s pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs, which<br />
have a very illustrated look to them, unlike<br />
Barks’s more realistic style.<br />
<strong>in</strong> approach. Barks’s<br />
technique was a hyperstylized<br />
realism that brought<br />
the real world’s appearance,<br />
physics and history <strong>in</strong>to his<br />
cartoon world. Skies, clouds,<br />
waves, rocks, grass, saloons,<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong>s, gold, jewels –<br />
anyth<strong>in</strong>g you could f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong><br />
Six ways to see a<br />
duck.<br />
1. Photography: Photo<br />
of a duck.<br />
2. Romanticism: Detail<br />
from “Mallard Ducks<br />
and Duckl<strong>in</strong>gs on a<br />
River Bank” by John<br />
Frederick Herr<strong>in</strong>g, Sr.<br />
3. Impressionism:<br />
Detail from the oil<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g “Five Ducks<br />
<strong>in</strong> a Pond” by William<br />
Koester.<br />
4. Photorealism:<br />
Detail from the acrylic<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g “Tundra<br />
Swan” by Peter Mathios,<br />
2009.<br />
5. Modernism: Detail<br />
from the oil pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g<br />
“Look Mickey” by Roy<br />
Lichtenste<strong>in</strong>, 1961.<br />
6. Imag<strong>in</strong>ative realism:<br />
Detail from my oil<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g “Oblivious”<br />
(7-2006).