ISO/TC 108/SC 3 N 388-CEN/T C 231 N 439
ISO/TC 108/SC 3 N 388-CEN/T C 231 N 439
ISO/TC 108/SC 3 N 388-CEN/T C 231 N 439
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Date: 2003-07 <strong>ISO</strong>/<strong>TC</strong> <strong>108</strong>/<strong>SC</strong> 3 N <strong>388</strong>-<strong>CEN</strong>/<strong>TC</strong> <strong>231</strong> N <strong>439</strong><br />
Report of voting on doc. <strong>108</strong>/3 N 367-<strong>CEN</strong>/<strong>TC</strong> <strong>231</strong> N 402<br />
Second <strong>ISO</strong>/CD 8041 "Human response to vibration - Measuring instrumentation"<br />
1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)<br />
Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations<br />
on each comment submitted<br />
Type<br />
of<br />
comment2<br />
Paragraph/<br />
Figure/Table/<br />
Note<br />
(e.g. Table 1)<br />
Clause No./<br />
Subclause No./<br />
Annex<br />
(e.g. 3.1)<br />
MB 1<br />
We think this comment arises<br />
due to the draft CD2<br />
confusing cross-talk and<br />
cross axis sensitivity, which<br />
produces this comment. We<br />
think the confusions have<br />
been dealt with in the revised<br />
draft.<br />
JP 05.17 te <strong>ISO</strong> 16063 does not give any description on multi-axes<br />
calibration technique. IEC 60747-14-4 only gives the<br />
description on the derivation of cross sensitivity.<br />
JP 11.10.2 te Linearity of phase is requested to be written. Rejected –There are now<br />
signal burst tests that would<br />
be adversely affected by<br />
poor phase response<br />
linearity.<br />
See previous responses to<br />
Japanese comments on 5.04<br />
and 5.17. We do not believe<br />
that the level of information<br />
suggested here is necessary.<br />
Clear description is necessary that the reference<br />
accelerometer for human vibration can provide the<br />
data for sensitivity as a matrix with every<br />
component as a function of frequency.<br />
JP 11.11.3 te <strong>ISO</strong> 16063-21 does not give the technique of cross<br />
sensitivity. It does not say anything about the frequency<br />
dependency of cross sensitivity.<br />
JP 12.09 te Linearity shall be stated in terms of phase. The new signal burst tests<br />
attempt to provide multifrequency<br />
inputs that would<br />
be adversely affected by<br />
incorrect phase responses.<br />
Rejected - We think this<br />
comment arises due to the<br />
draft CD2 confusing crosstalk<br />
and cross axis<br />
sensitivity, which produces<br />
this comment. We think the<br />
confusions have been dealt<br />
with in the revised draft.<br />
JP 12.10.3 te <strong>ISO</strong> 16063-21 does not give the technique of cross<br />
sensitivity. It does not say anything about the frequency<br />
dependency of cross sensitivity. Is there any calibration<br />
laboratory that can provide cross sensitivity under the<br />
concept of matrix sensitivity ?<br />
1 MB = Member body (enter the <strong>ISO</strong> 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the <strong>ISO</strong>/CS editing unit are identified by **)<br />
2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial<br />
NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory.<br />
page 13 of 25<br />
<strong>ISO</strong> electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10