26.02.2013 Views

ISO/TC 108/SC 3 N 388-CEN/T C 231 N 439

ISO/TC 108/SC 3 N 388-CEN/T C 231 N 439

ISO/TC 108/SC 3 N 388-CEN/T C 231 N 439

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Date: 2003-07 <strong>ISO</strong>/<strong>TC</strong> <strong>108</strong>/<strong>SC</strong> 3 N <strong>388</strong>-<strong>CEN</strong>/<strong>TC</strong> <strong>231</strong> N <strong>439</strong><br />

Report of voting on doc. <strong>108</strong>/3 N 367-<strong>CEN</strong>/<strong>TC</strong> <strong>231</strong> N 402<br />

Second <strong>ISO</strong>/CD 8041 "Human response to vibration - Measuring instrumentation"<br />

1 2 (3) 4 5 (6) (7)<br />

Comment (justification for change) by the MB Proposed change by the MB Secretariat observations<br />

on each comment submitted<br />

Type<br />

of<br />

comment2<br />

Paragraph/<br />

Figure/Table/<br />

Note<br />

(e.g. Table 1)<br />

Clause No./<br />

Subclause No./<br />

Annex<br />

(e.g. 3.1)<br />

MB 1<br />

We think this comment arises<br />

due to the draft CD2<br />

confusing cross-talk and<br />

cross axis sensitivity, which<br />

produces this comment. We<br />

think the confusions have<br />

been dealt with in the revised<br />

draft.<br />

JP 05.17 te <strong>ISO</strong> 16063 does not give any description on multi-axes<br />

calibration technique. IEC 60747-14-4 only gives the<br />

description on the derivation of cross sensitivity.<br />

JP 11.10.2 te Linearity of phase is requested to be written. Rejected –There are now<br />

signal burst tests that would<br />

be adversely affected by<br />

poor phase response<br />

linearity.<br />

See previous responses to<br />

Japanese comments on 5.04<br />

and 5.17. We do not believe<br />

that the level of information<br />

suggested here is necessary.<br />

Clear description is necessary that the reference<br />

accelerometer for human vibration can provide the<br />

data for sensitivity as a matrix with every<br />

component as a function of frequency.<br />

JP 11.11.3 te <strong>ISO</strong> 16063-21 does not give the technique of cross<br />

sensitivity. It does not say anything about the frequency<br />

dependency of cross sensitivity.<br />

JP 12.09 te Linearity shall be stated in terms of phase. The new signal burst tests<br />

attempt to provide multifrequency<br />

inputs that would<br />

be adversely affected by<br />

incorrect phase responses.<br />

Rejected - We think this<br />

comment arises due to the<br />

draft CD2 confusing crosstalk<br />

and cross axis<br />

sensitivity, which produces<br />

this comment. We think the<br />

confusions have been dealt<br />

with in the revised draft.<br />

JP 12.10.3 te <strong>ISO</strong> 16063-21 does not give the technique of cross<br />

sensitivity. It does not say anything about the frequency<br />

dependency of cross sensitivity. Is there any calibration<br />

laboratory that can provide cross sensitivity under the<br />

concept of matrix sensitivity ?<br />

1 MB = Member body (enter the <strong>ISO</strong> 3166 two-letter country code, e.g. CN for China; comments from the <strong>ISO</strong>/CS editing unit are identified by **)<br />

2 Type of comment: ge = general te = technical ed = editorial<br />

NOTE Columns 1, 2, 4, 5 are compulsory.<br />

page 13 of 25<br />

<strong>ISO</strong> electronic balloting commenting template/version 2001-10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!