Kokou D. ADJALLÉ) - INRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3. HyporHÈsEs - oBJEcflFs - oRtGrNArFÉ............. ........... 29 4. DÉMARCHE MÉTHODOrOG|QUE..... ............33 5. RÉSUITATS 5.2. ULTRAFTLTRATToN DEs SURNAGEANTS DE CENTRTFUGATToN ............... 5.2.7. Taille de la membrane - Volume du rétentot - taux de récupération ........... 36 .......... 36 5.2.2. Optimisation du flux d'alimentation et de lo pression tronsmembronoire ............ 5.23. Étude de colmatoge - Approche de mise en échette .... ...........36 ........... 37 5.5. OprMrsATroN DU pRocÉDÉ oe sÉcsae e pnn pulvÉRsaroN pouR LA pRoDUcnoN DEs pouDREs HUMTDES DE BroPEslctDEs3g RÉFÉRENcEs CHAPITRE 2. UTTRAFITTRATION (RÉSULTATS DES OBJECTTFS 1 ET 2) ................. ss U TTRAFI TTRATION RECOVERY OF ENTO MOTOXICITY FRO M SUPERNATANT OF BACI LLUS TH U RI NG I ENS'S FERMENTED WASTEWATER AND WASTEWATER STUDGE ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS... RÉsUMÉ ABSTRACT ABRÉVNTIONS 2. MATER|AIS AND METHODS ........................ 67 2.2.7. Media and chorocte 2.2.2. Solids amendment and pre-treatment procedure............... .........................67 2.4. TEcHNreuEs oF REcovERy oF ENToMoroxrcrry FRoM THE FERMENTED BRorHs .................. 68 2.4.2.!. Operating principle and washing of the filter..., .......................... 69 2.4.2.4. Comparative study of four culture media. ............71 xll 35 4t 53 55 57 59 61 63
2.5. EFFECT oF VTRULENCE FAcroRs oN ENToMoroxrcrry ................. ................71 2.6.7. Physicol parometers (turbidity and suspended solids) ....... ..........................72 2.6.2. Biologic 3.2. SELECTIoN oF oPEMTING PARAMETERS oF UTTRAFILTRATIoN................ .......75 3.2.7. Tronsmembrane pressure, TMP ............. ............75 3.3.7. Physical porameters (Turbidity ond suspended solids)........ .........................78 j.3.2. Biologico 3.3.2.3. Synergy of virulence factors - repercussions .......81 3. 3. 3. Applicabil ity-U F RECOVERY OF ENTOMOTOXICIW COMPONENTSOF BACILLUSTHURINGIENSIS FERMENTED WASTEWATER AND SLUDG E: U ITRAFI ITRATION SCATE-U P APPROACH ACKNOWIEDGEMENTS.... 2.1. TANGENTTAL FLow ULTRAF|LTRAT|oN................... 2.2. PTnMilgILITY AND RESISTANCE OF THE FoULING LAYER ............ 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS............... 3.3. MEAsURED eARAMETERs: rorAr soLrDs (TS), vraau seonrs (VS) AND SoLUBLE pRorErNs (SP).............. 4. RESUTTS AND DISCUSS|ON............ 4.1. OpïMrzATroN oF rHE PARAMETERS oF UF or vARrous MED|A........ ........... 115 4.2. VARIATIoN oF THE PERMEATE FLUX AND Loss oF ToTAL so1IDS............. ...... 116 4.4. RESTSTANCE oF THE FouLrNG LAYER AND scALE - up posst8r1rTY.................. ..................... 118 REFERENCES xlll 99 101 109 109 110 113 tl3 113 LL4 115 123
Page 1: LINIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC INSTITUT NA
Page 5: REMERCIEMENTS C'est avec un réel p
Page 8 and 9: 2. Yu K.D., Adjallé K.D., R.D. Tya
Page 11: DÉDICACE TABLE DES MATIERES PUBUCA
Page 15 and 16: 2.2. PRE-TREATMENT, FERMENTATToN AN
Page 17: LISTE DES TABLEAIIX CHAPITRE 1 TABL
Page 20 and 21: FtG. 38. REspoNsE suRFAcE oF vtABLE
Page 22 and 23: procédure consiste à optimiser le
Page 25 and 26: ABSTRACT The principal objective of
Page 27: For the anti-UV formulation, the re
Page 30 and 31: SBU SIW SS TH TMP TS USEPA Vips VS
Page 33 and 34: INrRooucrroN L'agriculture et la fo
Page 35 and 36: 1 . PnonrBMATreuES GENERALES 1.1. C
Page 37 and 38: déchets, I'idée de mise en valeur
Page 39 and 40: 2. RBvUB DE LITTERATURE 2.I. Bacill
Page 41 and 42: de son environnement; Il s'agit de
Page 43 and 44: 2.1.4. Entomotoxicité L'entomotoxi
Page 45 and 46: milieu de culture altematif pour I'
Page 47 and 48: formulation afin d'avoir un bon syn
Page 49 and 50: mais aussi les bactéries et les vi
Page 51 and 52: (contaminations pendant le stockage
Page 53 and 54: des feuilles non ombragées (Beckwi
Page 55 and 56: le produit formulé est appliqué.
Page 57 and 58: 2. 4. 2. 5. Différents types de fo
Page 59 and 60: 3. HvpoTHESES - Onrecrms - OnrcnrAl
Page 61: s'agit d'une étude qualitalive et
Page 65 and 66:
5. Rssurrers 5. 1. Fermentation et
Page 67 and 68:
même condition optimale peut être
Page 69 and 70:
5.4. Formulations antimicrobiennes
Page 71 and 72:
REFERENCES Adikane H.V., Singh R.K.
Page 73 and 74:
Brar S.K., Verma M., Tyagi R.D., Va
Page 75 and 76:
Griego V.M, Spence K.D. (1978). Ina
Page 77 and 78:
Lûthy P., Cordier J.L. and Fischer
Page 79 and 80:
Pardo-Lopez L., Munoz-Garay C., Por
Page 81 and 82:
Tirado-Montiel M.T.L., R. D. Tyagi
Page 83:
CHAPITRE 2. UITRAFILTRATION
Page 87:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are si
Page 91:
ABSTRACT The study investigates the
Page 95 and 96:
1. INrnooucrroN In order to fulfrll
Page 97 and 98:
2. Marpruet.s AND Mprnoos 2.L.Bacte
Page 99 and 100:
2.4.2. Ultrafiltration 2. 4. 2. I .
Page 101 and 102:
2.4.2.4. Comparative study offour c
Page 103 and 104:
2.6.2. Biological parameters 2.6.2.
Page 105 and 106:
3. Rpsuns AND DrscussroN 3.1. Selec
Page 107 and 108:
induced foam formation) through the
Page 109 and 110:
ultrafiltration efficacy for supern
Page 111 and 112:
3. 3. 2. 3. Syner gt of virulence f
Page 113:
the following order: NH > TH > SIW
Page 117 and 118:
tll I2l t3l t4l t5l t6l 17l t8l tel
Page 119:
l27l Aronson AI, Tyrell DJ, Fitz-Ja
Page 122 and 123:
Table 2. Screening of different mol
Page 124 and 125:
Optimal Q""6 (900l.htp-z; Feed pump
Page 126 and 127:
Ë o .Ct*, oc ttG sY ôg CL= 9g O5
Page 128 and 129:
Soya srw hTII TII ioya irw NH TII F
Page 131:
ACKNO\ryLEDGEMENTS The authors are
Page 135:
ABSTRACT This study reports results
Page 138 and 139:
components (viable spores and solub
Page 140 and 141:
2.2.Permeability and resistance of
Page 143 and 144:
3. Mnrnruar-s AND Mprnoos 3.1. Feed
Page 145 and 146:
4. Rpsurrs AND DrscussroN 4.1. Opti
Page 147 and 148:
The total resistance of the membran
Page 149:
acid) with a viscosity higher than
Page 153 and 154:
REFERENCES tl] Z.F. Cui, S.R. Bella
Page 155 and 156:
Table 1. Characteristics of the mem
Page 157 and 158:
I 5LL o *' E.E 0 g. a o 3i (5 8E+06
Page 159 and 160:
o -ct J E E c(U 0g a E -o .= '>6 oc
Page 161:
CHAPITRE 3. FORMULATION
Page 165:
Page 169:
ABSTRACT Photoprotection (against U
Page 173 and 174:
1. INrnooucrloN The potential adver
Page 175 and 176:
2. Marsruars AND METHoDS 2.L.Bacter
Page 177 and 178:
Variar/Cary WinUV 50 ConC UV-visibl
Page 179:
entomotoxicity measurements. About
Page 182 and 183:
components of Bt, as well as the in
Page 184 and 185:
3.3.1. Natural protection of cultur
Page 186 and 187:
absorbance followed the Beer-Lamber
Page 189:
CoNcrusroNs The study on photoprote
Page 192 and 193:
Chen, D., Ye, G., Yang, C., Chen, Y
Page 195 and 196:
Table 1. Characteristics of seconda
Page 197 and 198:
Table 3. Statistics analvsis of ent
Page 199 and 200:
300 310 +Soya 320 330 340 350 wavel
Page 201:
$ e F È $g E È 8 6 4 2 o I 6 4 2
Page 205:
Page 209:
ABSTRACT Three anti-microbial addit
Page 212 and 213:
Thus, in this study, various anti-m
Page 214 and 215:
2.3 . Anti-microbial Formulation Th
Page 217 and 218:
3. Rnsurrs 3.1 . Tests of contamina
Page 219:
4. CoNcrusroN Propionic acid and so
Page 222 and 223:
Knowles B., Ellar D.J. (1987). Coll
Page 224 and 225:
Table 2. Microorganisms and identif
Page 227:
PnnrIr III (Résultats de I'objecti
Page 231:
Résumé La méthode de réponse en
Page 235 and 236:
1. hlrnooucrroN Biopesticides deriv
Page 237 and 238:
2. MerBruers AND Mprnoos 2.I.Bacter
Page 239 and 240:
2.3.2. Method of ascending slope Th
Page 241 and 242:
3. Rpsulrs AND DrscussroN 3.1. Comp
Page 243 and 244:
determination, ,l?' of the model re
Page 245 and 246:
7.31x t08 SnU/g in their respective
Page 247:
solids concentration. In liquid for
Page 251 and 252:
REFERENCES Adjallé, K.D., Brar, S.
Page 253:
Xueyong, 2., Jiamping, D., Jianbao,
Page 256 and 257:
Table 2. Results of the steepest as
Page 258 and 259:
Table 4. Results of experimental pl
Page 260 and 261:
Table 6. Volume of fermented broth
Page 262 and 263:
g.8, #t #n 0 ÊÉÛ ,ÈÉû "&fi *f
Page 264 and 265:
u'fr ...': " .tÊE I i v eÊ,e &*94
Page 267:
CHAPITRE 4. CONCLUSIONS x RECOMMAND
Page 270 and 271:
4.2.Formulation anti - UV et antimi
Page 272 and 273:
4.4.2. Formulation Vu la revue de l
Page 275:
LTS ANINEXES
Page 279:
Figure 2. Variation of turbidity, c
Page 283 and 284:
Figure 1. Concentration of viable s
Page 285:
ANNE)G III PHOToSTABILIZATION oT Be
Page 288 and 289:
Figure 2. AV- Absorbance (in distil
show all

Kokou D. ADJALLÉ) - INRS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?