Kokou D. ADJALLÉ) - INRS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PUBLICATIONS DANS CETTE TT#SE l. K.D. Adjallé, S.K. Brar, M. Verma, R.D. Tyagi, J.R. Valéro, R.Y. Surampalli. (2007). Ultrafiltration recovery of entomotoxicity from supernatant of Bacillus thuringiensis fermented wastewater and wastewater sludge. Process Biochemistry 42: 1302-1311. 2. K.D. Adjallé, S.K. Brar, R.D. Tyagi, J.R. Valéro, R.Y. Surampalli. (2009). Photostabilization of Bacillus thuringiensls fermented wastewater and wastewater sludge based biopesticides using additives. Acta Tropica 111: 7-14. 3. K.D. Adjallé, S.K. Brar, R.D. Tyagi, J.R. Valéro, R.Y. Surampalli. (2009). Recovery of entomotoxicity components of Bacillus thuringiensls fermented wastewater and sludge: Ultrafiltration acale-up approch. Separation and PuriJication Technologt 69: 275-279. 4. K.D. Adjallé, K.D. Vu, S.K. Brar, R.D. Tyagi, J.R. Valéro. Microbial protection of Bacillus thuringiensis fermented wastewater and wastewater sludge based biopesticides using additives. (tr[anuscript to be submitted). 5. K.D. Adjallé, K.D. Vu, S.K. Brar, R.D. Tyagi, J.R. Valéro. Optimization of spray drying by Response surface methodology for the production of Bacillus thuringiensls biopesticides by using fermented wastewater and wastewater sludge. (Manascript to be submitted). PUBLICATIONS HORS TT{ESE 1. Vu K.D., Adjallé K.D., Tyagi R.D., Valéro J.R., Surampalli R.Y. recovery of chitinase and zwittermicin A from Bacillus thuringiensrrs fermented broth to produce biopesticides with high bopesticidal activity. (Accepted for pablication, Bioressources Technologt, BITE-D- 09-0210n. vll
Page 1: LINIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC INSTITUT NA
Page 5: REMERCIEMENTS C'est avec un réel p
Page 9: CONGRÈS ET CONFÉRENCES Adjallé K
Page 12 and 13: 3. HyporHÈsEs - oBJEcflFs - oRtGrN
Page 14 and 15: CHAPITRE 3. FORMU|AT!ON............
Page 16 and 17: 4.4.3. Formulation des poudres humi
Page 19 and 20: LISTE DES FIGURES CHAPITRE 1. FIGUR
Page 21 and 22: nBsuraB Le but principal de ce proj
Page 23: Pour la formulation anti-UV, les r
Page 26 and 27: plan (CCP) and the response strface
Page 29 and 30: Bt CPI DDT EUA KDa MRS PVA Tx UF UV
Page 31: CHAPITRE T SvruTHÈsr
Page 34 and 35: pzrr exemple, les eaux usées indus
Page 36 and 37: Malgré cette prévision prometteus
Page 38 and 39: prétraitement des boues, ainsi que
Page 40 and 41: Figure 1. Cellules, spores et crist
Page 42 and 43: cesse de s'alimenter et finalement
Page 44 and 45: quantifier I'effet des spores dans
Page 46 and 47: 2.3.2. Composition des boues Actuel
Page 48 and 49: ouillon fermenté à base de Bt obt
Page 50 and 51: Vu les conclusions des travaux de B
Page 52 and 53: potenliels insecticides. Il est mon
Page 54 and 55: entre les forces répulsives et att
Page 56 and 57:
Tableau 2. Fonctions et effets de q
Page 58 and 59:
la pulvérisation. La formation de
Page 60 and 61:
Hyoothèse 3: il est possible d'obt
Page 63:
4. DBuancHE METHoDoLocreuE 4.1. Pla
Page 66 and 67:
5 .2. Ultrafi ltration des surnagea
Page 68 and 69:
de TH, dans le but de réduire la r
Page 70 and 71:
fait que la mesure de I'entomotoxic
Page 72 and 73:
Bacchin P., Aimar P. (2005). Critic
Page 74 and 75:
Date R.A. (1970) Microbiological pr
Page 76 and 77:
Jones K.A. (1988). Sudies of the pe
Page 78 and 79:
Molloy D.P. (1990). Progress in the
Page 80 and 81:
Saksinchai S., Suphantharika M. and
Page 82 and 83:
Yezza A., Tyagi R.D., Valéro J.R.,
Page 85:
PnnrIE I (Résultats des objectifs
Page 89:
RESUME L'étude porte sur la récup
Page 93:
Cf""d Cpermeate Cretentate J* kDa L
Page 96 and 97:
mixture yielding high recovery and
Page 98 and 99:
carried out by using the "Waring bl
Page 100 and 101:
through the membrane until the memb
Page 102 and 103:
subjected to Tx determination. To e
Page 104 and 105:
2.6.2.3. Enzymatic activity (protea
Page 106 and 107:
(with known pressure of the feed),
Page 108 and 109:
conditions as soya. The optimal val
Page 110 and 111:
3.3.2.2. Protease and chitinase The
Page 112 and 113:
3.3.3. Applicability-UF' Eflicacy I
Page 115:
CoNcrusroNs The following conclusio
Page 118 and 119:
[3] Kim YT, Huang HT. The p-Exotoxi
Page 121 and 122:
Table 1. Characteristics of seconda
Page 123 and 124:
Table 3. Results of turbidity, prot
Page 125 and 126:
4.0F06 3.5Ef06 3.0Er06 2.5Er06 2.0F
Page 127 and 128:
f F zY .Ë = -Ct L = F I 000 800 60
Page 129:
PnnrIE II (Résultats de l'objectif
Page 133:
RESUME Cette étude rapporte les r
Page 137 and 138:
1. INrRooucrroN The processes of me
Page 139 and 140:
2. Tnsony 2.1 . T angential fl ow u
Page 141:
t *t, V _V, !'N v+v.\+ Æ' 2A'L(TMP
Page 144 and 145:
t^=L 'tA 3.3. Measured parameters:
Page 146 and 147:
The results of the optimization of
Page 148 and 149:
4.4. Resistance of the fouling laye
Page 151:
CoNcrusroNs This study of ultrafilt
Page 154 and 155:
[15] APHA, AWWA, WEF, Standard Meth
Page 156 and 157:
I tr LL I Ë E Ë .g 0 8. o o .cl (
Page 158 and 159:
N c 5 5 7oo x :t g 600 (U 9l ts È
Page 160 and 161:
o ? a L 2 a qt 2.50E+06 2.49E+06 2.
Page 163:
PnnrIE I (Résuttats de I'objectif
Page 167:
nBSUr,m Cette étude porte sur la p
Page 171:
LSA M M M1 M2 ltutr - tutz] N NH PA
Page 174 and 175:
Various low and high product yieldi
Page 176 and 177:
centifugation. Bt fermented broths
Page 178 and 179:
samples \Àrere withdrawn after 8,
Page 181 and 182:
3. Rnsurrs AND DISCUSSIoN 3.1 . Phy
Page 183 and 184:
derived from sugar, and small perce
Page 185 and 186:
NH sludge possesses higher half-lif
Page 187:
entomotoxicity losses of 47Yo and 4
Page 191 and 192:
REFERENCES Adjalle, K.D., Brar, S.K
Page 193:
MENV, 2004. Guide sur la valorisati
Page 196 and 197:
Table 2. Characteristics of UV-prot
Page 198 and 199:
Table 4. HalfJives based on entomot
Page 200 and 201:
300 310 --.- LSA (1 s/l) 330 340 35
Page 203:
PanrIr II (Résultats de I'objectif
Page 207:
nBSUr,m Cette étude porte sur l'op
Page 211 and 212:
INrRooucTIoN Biopesticides are bein
Page 213 and 214:
2. Mnrnruars AND METHoDS 2.1. Bacil
Page 215:
fact, about 0.75 ml of each dilutio
Page 218 and 219:
3.2.Effect of additives on viable s
Page 221 and 222:
REFERENCES Adjallé K.D., Brar S.K.
Page 223 and 224:
Table l. Characteristics of starch
Page 225:
Table 3. Results of viable spores a
Page 229:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors are si
Page 233:
ABSTRACT Response surface methodolo
Page 236 and 237:
the importance of dry formulations,
Page 238 and 239:
and the hot air is large, more than
Page 240 and 241:
2.4.1. Viable spores and entomotoxi
Page 242 and 243:
3.3. Central composite design (CCD)
Page 244 and 245:
explained by the combined negative
Page 246 and 247:
International Unit (IU) determined
Page 249:
CoNcrusroNs Optimization of spray d
Page 252 and 253:
Burges, H.D., 1998. Formulation of
Page 255 and 256:
Table 1. Characteristics of starch
Page 257 and 258:
Table 3. Levels of the factors test
Page 259 and 260:
Table 5. Results of experimental pl
Page 261 and 262:
Feed Pump Inlet temperature sensor
Page 263 and 264:
Afr,$ tfrb 0 Fig. 2b. Response surf
Page 265:
sf + Ê5s u@,+ ù Fig. 3b. Response
Page 269 and 270:
4. CoNcrusroN Cette étude démontr
Page 271 and 272:
oues hydrolysées. Deuxièmement, a
Page 273:
4.4.3. Formulation des poudres humi
Page 277:
ANNEXE I UTTnaTILTRATIoN REcoVERY o
Page 281:
ANNEXE II UITnnTILTRATIoN scALE-UP
Page 284 and 285:
Figure 4. Variation of losses of so
Page 287 and 288:
Figure 1. Absorbance profiles of su
Page 289:
Figure 3. Entomotoxicity half-lives
show all

Kokou D. ADJALLÉ) - INRS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?